Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
521 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The revisionist Faruq Khan appealed the Family Court's order directing him to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his wife and Rs 1,000 to his son under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that, as a labourer and small farmer with an uncertain income of about Rs 4,000‑5,000 per month, the …
The revisionists, Jagat Singh and another, filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel Arshad Ullah informed the court that the revisionists no longer wished to pursue the revision. The court considered whether a revision can continue when the parties have …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision (No. 1641 of 2012) seeking to withdraw the petition and obtain permission to file an appeal before the appropriate court. The revisionist's counsel submitted a withdrawal application requesting that the revision be dismissed as withdrawn. The court …
The petitioners, a wife and her minor son, filed a criminal revision under Section 127 CrPC challenging a Family Court order that enhanced their maintenance to Rs.5,000 and Rs.4,000 respectively. They argued that the court failed to consider the husband’s salary of over Rs.55,000 per month and did …
The husband (revisionist) filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the CrPC seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 25‑01‑2017 that required him to pay Rs.2,000 per month to his wife and Rs.1,000 each to their three children. He alleged that the wife had left the matrimonial home …
Ajay Kumar filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to modify the payment of arrears ordered by the Family Court, which required him to pay a lump sum of Rs. 1,64,000. He did not contest the merits of the maintenance order, only requested that the arrears be paid in …
The petitioner, Smt. Ayushi, filed Criminal Revision No. 3228 of 2018 against the State of U.P. and another party. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the parties had reached a compromise outside of court and sought to withdraw the revision. The court considered whether a criminal …
The accused Ajay Shahi, Munna Kushwaha and Rajendra Rai were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in 2013 for offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 452, 504 and 506 based on the testimony of the complainant and his relatives. The appellants filed a criminal revision alleging that the FIR was …
The revisionist Smt. Sunita Chaudhary filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's order dated 15 May 2017 that summoned the opposite parties under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code. The revision sought to set aside that order. However, the opposite parties had …
The revisionist, Mohammad Kamil, challenged a Gram Nyayalay order directing him to pay Rs 3,500 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed he had no permanent income, that his wife was living away of her own volition, and that the trial court …
Hira Lal and others were convicted under IPC sections 323/34, 325/34 and 504, receiving six months, two years and one year of imprisonment respectively, along with fines. They filed a criminal revision contending that they had already served more than six months, suffered health ailments, were not …
The revisionists, Smt Mamta Kumari and two others, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting their application for discharge in a case under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. After the trial court later framed …
The petitioners, Smt. Munni Devi and others, filed Criminal Revision No. 2725 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an earlier order. Counsel for the revisionists informed the court that the matter had been settled between the parties and requested that the revision be withdrawn. The …
Aftab Alam filed Criminal Revision No. 2355 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The revisionist was represented by counsel Mir Sayed, while the opposite party was represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for …
Krishnanand filed a criminal revision (No. 2349 of 2026) against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist's counsel, Arun Kumar Srivastava and others, submitted that the revision had become infructuous. The court considered whether the revision could still be entertained. Relying on the …
The petitioner, Prabhu Narayan Singh, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 338 of 2024 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to challenge a charge‑sheet and the order of cognizance dated 19‑11‑2025 filed by the competent court. The petitioner, through counsel Surendra Yadav, expressed a …
Rahul Prasad filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8453 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Arvind Prabodh Dubey, later informed the court that the petition had become …
Kunwar Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20406 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Rajeev Upadhyay, appeared and submitted that the petition had become infructuous and the petitioner no longer wished to pursue it. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
Jagat Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20404 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State. The petitioner, through counsel Ganesh Datta Sharma, Pankaj Sharma and Surendra Kumar Chaubey, later informed the court that he no longer wished to …
The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21161 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel, communicated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ petition. The court noted the …
Raju @ Rajesh filed Criminal Appeal No. 1583 of 1985 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as recorded in an office report dated 8 September 2026 based on the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s report. The court was required to consider …
The appellant, Ekhlaq, filed a criminal appeal but died on 11 April 2018. The court received an office report confirming his death and noted that no relative filed an application for substitution. Since the appellant was deceased and no substitution was made, the appeal could not proceed. The court …
The appellants Ram Kunwar and Ram Kewal were convicted for the murder of Smt. Shanichari and for concealing the offence based on the testimony of the victim's five‑year‑old daughter, Kumari Pramila, and the alleged recovery of a knife. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the …
The petitioner, Md Oqais Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26-07-2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
The petitioners, Khajan Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120B of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited their relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. …
Madhur Srivastav filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held …
Vipin Bansal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1965. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal …
Petitioner Sandeep Soni sought to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 filed under sections 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it …
Jugendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 07‑08‑2026 (Case Crime No. 0190 of 2026) that alleged offences under sections 74, 76, 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner later limited his relief to protection under …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 09.03.2026, registered under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S, alleging false implication. The respondent State argued that a cognizable offence was disclosed and interference was not warranted. The Court …
Gautam Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 74 and 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, Mithlesh Yadav @ Dada and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 110, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially asking for …
The petitioners, Rajkapoor and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 08‑07‑2026 under sections 74, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
Ajay Kumar Gautam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2020 that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. While the original prayer was to set aside the FIR, the petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and …
Harilal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 under Sections 2, 3 and 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. During the hearing he limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Tetarbe filed a writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 16‑09‑2018 that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 120‑B. The relief was later limited to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC. The Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a cognizable …
Petitioner Dhirendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The police had already forwarded a charge sheet, and the petitioner’s counsel, Ram Krishna Yadav, requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Additional Government …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 333, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While the petition later limited its relief to protection under section 35 of the …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petition was later limited to a request for protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section 35 of …
Anurag Goyal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 08‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to a protection order under …
Adarsh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 14‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 352, 352(3), 79 and 67 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under section 35 of the same …
Petitioner Ravindra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑03‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66C of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The relief was later limited to protection …
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR dated 14‑07‑2026 under sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, relying …
Mayank Bhatnagar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑07‑2026 under Section 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR, found that it …
The petitioners, Munna Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The police had forwarded a charge sheet in the matter, and the learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the court that the petition was no longer required. The …
Petitioner Aadhar Choudhary filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.07.2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Court examined the …
Petitioners Mohd. Tasleem and others filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(2), 336(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. While initially asking for the FIR to be set aside, the petitioners later limited their …
Petitioners Dular Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 61(2), 217, 229(2), 301 and 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. While the original prayer was …
Ajay Kumar Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 23.08.2026 that gave rise to Case Crime No.0132 of 2026 under sections 125, 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under section …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. After the charge sheet was submitted, the petitioners’ counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to …
Suraj Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The police subsequently submitted a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. Upon learning of the charge-sheet, the petitioner's counsel, Brajesh Kumar Singh, moved that the writ petition be dismissed as …
The petitioner, Ravi Pratap, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report in the matter had been submitted. Both the petitioner’s counsel, Atul Kumar, and the respondent’s …
Rohit Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 4‑8‑2026 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 35 of the …
Manoj Kumar Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to recover his lost motorcycle, associated money and documents, and to compel the respondent to decide his representation dated 11 June 2026. The petitioner alleged that the motorcycle …
Petitioner Rajendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State of U.P. and others filed a charge-sheet, after which the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Tripathi, moved that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered that …
The petition filed by minor Rishu Tiwari @ Shashwat Tripathi sought to quash an FIR dated 21‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and Section 35 of the Bharatiya …
The petitioners, Firdaus and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.). During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed against the petitioners. The petitioners' counsel then prayed for dismissal of the writ petition on …
The petitioner, Jitendra Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but after being informed that the charge sheet had been submitted, he requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, reserving the right to pursue any other legal remedy. The respondent State of …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Goswami filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 under sections 125(b) and 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under section 41‑A of the CrPC and section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, Tara Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after a charge sheet was submitted in their case. They later moved the court to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed, indicating they might seek other legal remedies. The respondent …
The petitioners Kanhai and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16 July 2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the SC/ST Act. During the hearing they limited their relief to a protection order under section 35 of …
The petitioner R.K. Verma sought to quash an FIR dated 26 June 2026, registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and later limited the relief to protection under Section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, …
Petitioners Smt Pooja and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report had been submitted. Both the petitioners' counsel and the respondent's counsel agreed that the …
Rakesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR, found …
The petitioners, Anuj Kumar Pandey and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 04‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 75, 76, 333 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. During the hearing the petitioners …
Petitioners Kapil Dhama and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26 July 2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2), 352, 351(3) and 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While initially seeking quashal, they later limited their relief to …
Nirmala Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20500 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against her. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a charge sheet had been submitted in the underlying criminal case. On this …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 08.08.2026 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the SC/ST Act, later limiting relief to protection under section 35 of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, citing Supreme …
Petitioners Imran and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered on 10‑08‑2026 under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya …
Petitioners Ashok Yadav and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 7‑8‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 351(3), 304 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they limited their relief to protection under …
The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR dated 15 June 2026, registered under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging false implication. The State argued that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence. The Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but their counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed in the underlying case and therefore they did not wish to pursue the writ further. The court accepted this position and dismissed the writ …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …
Petitioner Jitendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 925 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the charge sheet had already been filed and that no further judicial order was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioner, Mohammad Hanif, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The petitioners Vimal Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as …
In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by Vimal S Lal, the petitioner sought relief despite a charge sheet having been submitted. The petitioner’s counsel argued that no further order was necessary after the charge sheet filing. The respondents did not contest this position. The Court …
The petitioner, Kiran, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the Court that the police had already submitted a charge sheet after completing the investigation. The …
The petitioner, Mayank Rawat, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings after a charge sheet was filed. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the submission of the charge sheet rendered any further judicial intervention unnecessary. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
Petitioners Anjana Jadaun and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that a final report in the matter had already been submitted and no further order was necessary. The court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The High Court observed that once a …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's learned AGA appeared. The court noted that the charge-sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioner Sanjay Ram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11‑05‑2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioner, Harikesh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioner, Nuzul Akhtar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed …
The petitioners, Padamveer Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, appeared before the court. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioner, Akanksha Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that …
The petitioner, Sandeep Tiwari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the …
Praveesh Kuzhipally filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against him. The State of Uttar Pradesh and four others filed a charge‑sheet, and the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police confirmed its filing on 11‑May‑2026. The …
The petitioner, Mohd. Tariq, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Director General of …
Petitioners Dinesh Maurya and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been …
The petitioners Arjun Prasad and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …
Petitioners Kulvinder Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings against them. They contended that the charge sheet had already been submitted and therefore no further judicial intervention was …
The petitioners, Danish and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a …
The petitioners, Wasim and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioners, Robin Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners, Dhirendra Yadav and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that …
The petitioner Vishant Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners, Shivji Rajbhar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the police had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that the …
The petitioners, Shashi Dubey and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge‑sheet in the matter had already …
Petitioners Poonam Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …
The petitioners, Ashraf alias Shekhu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioner, Himanshu Triwedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioner, Nawab Noor, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 11 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The appellant Rajnish was convicted by the Sessions Court for kidnapping, assault, and rape of a minor, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and life imprisonment. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the victim's statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC, treated as a dying declaration, and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised list, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court examined an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 11 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the …
Petitioners Ajeet Saxena and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State of Uttar Pradesh, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted a counter‑affidavit stating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. …
Shubham filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Family Court order that fixed Rs.5,000 per month as maintenance for his legally wedded wife, claiming he is ill and unemployed and the amount is excessive. The State opposed, asserting that the …
The petitioners Yash Paul and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …
The petitioner, Raman Mann, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The petitioners, Muskan Sahgal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had …
The petitioners, Ishwar Chandra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating …
The petitioners, Smt. Kaju and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the …
Petitioners Ajay Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The investigating officer appeared and submitted a certified copy of the charge sheet before the High Court. The Court observed that the filing of the charge sheet rendered the …
The petitioners, Jaydeep Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two others. The investigating officer appeared before the court and informed that a charge sheet had already been submitted in the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate appeared. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per …
The petitioner Imran Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard after the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police. The Court noted …
Petitioner Teerath Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a charge sheet had already been filed, rendering the writ petition moot. The respondents did not contest this submission. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by its Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioners Asif and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …
Smt. Saraswati and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR filed against them. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined a report …
The petitioner, Smt. Indu Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 05.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …
The petitioner, Ravi Shankar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioner Jitendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …
The petitioner Arif Khan @ Lucky filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 05.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …
The petitioner, Jaivir, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7335 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Kumar Verma, argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioner, Mohd. Saeed, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
Petitioners Neha and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The court examined a report dated 05‑05‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. Relying on the fact that a charge‑sheet had been …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against them. The petition was heard after the police had filed a charge sheet, as reflected in the office report dated 05.05.2026. The court observed that the filing of the charge sheet made the challenge to …
Petitioners Smt. Abhilasha and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The petitioners argued that the filing of a charge sheet rendered the writ petition infructuous and therefore it should be dismissed. The respondents, the State of U.P. and …
The petitioners, Shekhar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed on May 5, 2026. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …
The petitioner, Pavan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that since the charge-sheet was on record, the FIR could not be quashed by the writ petition. …
The petitioners, Smt. Shraddha Taneja and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated …
Petitioners Shambhu Nath Rai and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …
The petitioner, Mahesh Chandra Shukla, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The High Court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report from the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. Since the charge-sheet was on record, the …
The petitioner, Devendra Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 05.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by counsel, submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of a charge-sheet rendered the challenge to …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, with counsel for the petitioner absent and the State represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …
The petitioner, Ambrish George Frederic, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …
The petitioner, Saddam Husain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …
The petitioners Amit Pratap challenged the registration of the FIR filed against them before the Allahabad High Court. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the …
The High Court considered a criminal contempt application filed against a senior advocate who had previously been held in contempt. The contemnor, aged about 72, filed an unconditional written apology after being granted time to submit an affidavit. The Special Counsel argued that, being a repeat …
The petitioner Mahendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already …
The petitioners Sanjay Singh Sengar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that once a …
The petitioner, Sneha Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the police had already filed a charge-sheet. The Court noted that once a …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed by the …
The petitioners Golu @ Pradeep and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, appeared before the bench. The court examined an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that …
The petitioners, Smt Preeti and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 05.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …
