Created by Fuzzy Cloud

JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY

521 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

DEEPAK SHARMA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The court examined a report dated 05‑05‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. On the basis that the charge‑sheet was filed, the court held …

RAMNATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

UMESH SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Umesh Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

BOBY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as confirmed by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. No …

KIRAN WALA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the …

KAILASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

PRABHAT CHAUDHARY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State submitted a charge‑sheet on 5 May 2026, as reflected in the office report. The petition sought to quash the FIR despite the charge‑sheet already being filed. The Court observed that once a …

MOHD AFZAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but the trial court later filed a charge sheet against them. The petitioners argued that the filing of the charge sheet made the writ petition infructuous and should be dismissed. The respondents contended that the petition …

SOHAN SINGH ALIAS SONU THAKUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sohan Singh alias Sonu Thakur and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been …

AJAY KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them in a case pending before the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, rendering the petition moot. The court …

NAVEDA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that once a charge-sheet is …

SAJID AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

ARVIND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Arvind Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petitioner was unrepresented at the hearing, while the State was represented by its Additional Government Advocate. The court noted, based on a report …

KALPANA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kalpana Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

WASIM ANWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was heard after the charge-sheet had already been filed by the police, as per a report dated 5 May 2026. The court noted that the petition sought to contest the FIR, but the filing of …

DHARMRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dharmraj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P. No …

BABITA RASTOGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Babita Rastogi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State of U.P. submitted a charge‑sheet, as reflected in the office report dated 5 May 2026. The Court observed that since the charge‑sheet had …

JANGI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Jangi Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted …

ARVIND AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Arvind and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

MOHD. HAIDAR AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd. Haidar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 5 May 2026 from the Legal Cell …

ANIRUDH PASWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anirudh Paswan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that a …

FAUZIA KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ms. Fauzia Khan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7414 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners, Ravi Anand Agarwal and Shreya …

LAVKUSH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Lavkush and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against them. The petition was listed in the revised list; the petitioners were absent while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined an …

KOSHAL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Koshal Sharma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that …

AMIT AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the …

FAIZ KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Faiz Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed on 5 May 2026. The Court noted that …

SOMIL SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Somil Shah filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. …

SHABANA KHAN @ SHABANA BEGAM KHANversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shabana Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 5 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the …

RAHEES KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in …

MEGHA MAURYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Megha Maurya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a …

AMARJIT NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Amarjit Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the petitioner. The …

SHRI. MANOJ TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

ANURAG BHARDWAJ AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against them. The Court examined a report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet in the matter. Since the charge‑sheet was on record, the …

RAKESH SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 4 May 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

AYUSH AGARWAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ayush Agarwal and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been …

ANUJ KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Anuj Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …

SANJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State submitted a report from the Director General of Police indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that the petition …

MONU @ MUNENDRA UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Monu @ Munendra Upadhyay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04‑05‑2026 indicating that the …

BRIJESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the …

RAMESH @ RAMESH KUMAR AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …

AWADHESH MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

VISHAL YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

SHIVA RAJAURA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

SMT. MONIKA SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Monika Singh and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a …

IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Imran filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that the …

MANJEET SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Manjeet Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been …

RAJU GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Raju Goswami, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Dharmendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing …

DEEPAK BANSWAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that …

ABHISHEK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …

JITENDRA SINGH YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Jitendra Singh Yadav and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been …

YASHWANT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Yashwant Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet by the police, invoking Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition sought relief to quash the charge‑sheet. The High Court observed that the charge‑sheet had …

KIRAN VERMA AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the …

VIJAY KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …

SAUD ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Saud Ali Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, with counsel Abhishek Mishra representing the petitioner and G.A. and Vijay Kumar Dwivedi representing the State of U.P. The court …

ASHISH @ SHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashish @ Shankar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a …

RAM PRAKASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by its learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

NAVNEET PRAJAPATI @ NAVNEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Navneet Prajapati challenged the registration of an FIR before the Allahabad High Court, alleging impropriety. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

SUSHILA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sushila Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, with counsel for the petitioners absent and the State represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court …

PUSHPA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

PHOOLCHAND AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Phoolchand and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, appeared, while the petitioners were absent. The court examined a report dated …

RINKU DIWAKER AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

AMAN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

MURTAZA HUSSAIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

GAURAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of a …

BHOOP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bhoop Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …

KANHAIYA LAL @ KRISHANA BAGHEL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …

DHIRENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by its learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 04.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

VIJAY KRISHNA GOELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of …

MANOJ KUMAR PATEL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners' counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because a police report had already been filed in the matter. The petition sought dismissal of the writ on that ground. The High Court …

GULZAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed …

DIWAKAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Diwakar Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the …

FARMAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …

REETA CHAUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …

SURESH CHANDRA VERMA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that once a …

SHATRUGHNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Shatrughna Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 04.05.2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …

ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Anil Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the …

MURARI RASTOGIversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court observed that …

PRIYANKAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Priyanka, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against her. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the …

SANTOSH PATEL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the …

RAKESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rakesh Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been …

BRAJESH KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. The …

SMT. SUSHMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Sushma and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P. …

KAJAL KANNAUJIYA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …

SOBARAN SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by …

GIRJA SHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Girja Shankar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been …

DHEERAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

RAJVEER SINGH @ RAJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

DEEPAK NISHAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to challenge the registration of an FIR. The State submitted a charge‑sheet on 4 May 2026, as reflected in the legal cell’s office report. The Court observed that the filing of a charge‑sheet indicates …

SHOEBversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shoeb, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, opposed the petition. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …

BABITA RANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babita Rani, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge-sheet on 4 May 2026. The High Court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, rendering the …

PARVEZ AKHTAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already …

SUSHIL KUMAR VARMA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. The Court noted …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Ankit Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of …

NITIN YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

SMT SIMPAL RANA @ ARCHNA TOMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Smt Simpal Rana @ Archna Tomar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR registered against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report dated 4 May 2026 indicating …

SHAKUNTALA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against them. The Court examined a report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. Relying on the fact that the charge‑sheet …

ANSHU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

YADVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Yadvendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

ANANTRAM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet in the …

PRADEEP CHAURASIYA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a …

SANTOSH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Santosh Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, appeared before the court while the petitioners were absent. The court noted that the …

SANTOSH YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Santosh Yadav and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the …

RAHUL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Agrahari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the …

SITANSHU DUTTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that once a charge-sheet is …

DEVI PRASAD AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …

PUSHPARAJ AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director …

BOD SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

MRITUNJAY JAI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mritunjay Jai Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge-sheet, which was reflected in an office report dated 4 May 2026. The Court noted that …

BABU SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

JAWAHAR LAL AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jawahar Lal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …

SHIVAM AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivam and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 4 May 2026 indicating that the police had …

OM PRAKASHversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Om Prakash filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The petition was heard after the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the police, as per the legal cell report dated 4 May 2026. The court noted that the petition sought to quash the …

SMT. KALAWATI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Kalawati and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already …

POOJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Pooja and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

SMT. ARCHANA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Archana Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against her. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the police had already submitted the charge-sheet in the case. The court held that since the charge-sheet was filed, the writ …

KALEEM KHANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaleem Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call, but the petitioner was not present while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the …

IMRAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Imran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …

JUBAIR ALAM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The High Court noted that the filing of the charge …

MAHENDRA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Singh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the …

DILSHAD @ DILLA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been …

CHIRAG RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Chirag Rawat filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The court examined an office report dated 2 May 2026 which confirmed that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

BOBBY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that the …

SHIVPUJAN @ MODH. UMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shivpujan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report …

LOVKUSH @ RAMACHARYA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lovkush @ Ramacharya Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY @ SANTOSH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 02.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

SHIWAM @ ASHUTOSH DUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Shiwam @ Ashutosh Dubey and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

KM. NAJIS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the petitioners. The Court noted that the filing …

SHIVANI MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivani Mishra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the police had …

RANJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Ranjeet filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed …

SATISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satish Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in the …

NAFEES AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …

BAJRANG LAL HARIRAM TIBREWALA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bajrang Lal Hariram Tibrewala and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that the police had already submitted a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal …

VIJAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The High Court noted that the police had already filed a charge sheet, as per a report dated 2 May 2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the court held that the petition, which sought to …

SONU YADAV @ RAJESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sonu Yadav (alias Rajesh Yadav), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 …

DEEPAK AND ANOTERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The …

SAHAB KHAN @ SAHABUDDIN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02‑05‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

MANIRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Maniram and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the …

UDAI PRAKASH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

SUSHILA DEVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

ANITA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anita Katiyar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as …

RAJESH PANDEY @ SONU PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SACHENDRA SINGH YADAV @ SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachendra Singh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5596 of 2023) challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

SACHIN @ SONU TIWARI AND AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court examined an office report dated 2 May …

DEVENDRA PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Devendra Pal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court …

HEMENDRA SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

VIRENDRA MAURYA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

HANS NATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet …

DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5345 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court …

RAJIYA BEJUM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajiya Bejum and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

VIJENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijendra Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been …

ABDUL RAHMAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

In Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5603 of 2022, Abdul Rahman and five others filed a petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petitioners were not present at the hearing, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court examined a …

AAKANKSHA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed that …

MUMTAZ BEGAUM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mumtaz Begaum and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, opposed the petition. The court examined an office report dated 02 May 2026 indicating that the charge sheet …

BIJENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Akash filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against him. The petition was heard before a division bench of the Allahabad High Court, with counsel Vishnu Shankar Mishra representing the petitioner and G.A. for the State. The court noted …

AJAY KATIYAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court …

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that, per a report dated 02‑05‑2026, the charge sheet in the matter had …

JAYANT GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that once a charge sheet is filed, …

SYED MOHAMMAD AJAJUL HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

SMT KIRAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Kiran Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police's Legal Cell, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been …

DHIRAJ SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Dhiraj Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 5355 of 2025) in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, opposed the petition. The petition was heard in the …

SURAJ PASWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Suraj Paswan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court …

MAHESH PRASAD RAJAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mahesh Prasad Rajak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

SURJEET SINGH @ BILLAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Surjeet Singh (Billar Singh), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the …

BHAGWAN PASWAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR, alleging impropriety. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 2 May 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed against the …

MAHENDRA JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Jaiswal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 02.05.2026 indicating …

ALOK KUMAR DUBEY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Alok Kumar Dubey and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, were represented by the Additional Government Advocate. The High Court examined the office …

JADUNATH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

MOHAN SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohan Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet in the matter, as indicated by a report from the Director …

SMT. PRACHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed …

SHALIGRAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Shaligram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet, as indicated by a report dated 02.05.2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SMT. ANU GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Anu Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge …

SHRI AMIT GARGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Amit Garg, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The High Court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed by the police, as per the report dated 02.05.2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the Court held that the writ …

UMA SHANKAR AND 16 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed …

AMIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Amir and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 2 May 2026 …

NAFEES MISTRI ALIAS NAFEES KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nafees Mistri, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

SMT. GUNJAN KUMARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The …

SWETA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Sweta and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, while the State's Advocate General was present. The Court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition …

ASIF NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

RAMESHWAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet is filed, …

SHAHRUKH @ SHAHRUKH NIREMAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The court examined an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 which confirmed that the charge‑sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. …

BHIMSENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Bhimsen filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet had already …

ASIF NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet …

ASIF NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Asif Naseem filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SWATANTRA RAJPOOT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

GURJEET DIWANversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gurjeet Diwan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a …

RAMU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet …

HASEEN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet rendered …

MUNNA LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Munna Lal and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the …

TALEWAR @ TALE SINGH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …

KRISHNA CHAURASIA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court examined whether the petition could proceed given the …

SANGEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against her. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Uttar …

OM PRAKASH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director …