Created by Fuzzy Cloud

JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY

521 judgments · newest first · showing 401–521

TIKA RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner Tika Ram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate appeared. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already …

DEVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Devraj Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from …

SURYA KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The High Court noted that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed, as per a report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Police. Since the charge sheet was on record, the Court held …

DINESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The petition was heard in the revised call, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court noted that the charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report from the …

BINEET KUMAR @ CHUNKAUNA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Bineet Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, opposed the petition. The court noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a …

UPDESH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Updesh Singh and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been …

GURU DUTT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Guru Dutt and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Director General of Police, submitted a charge sheet, as reflected in an office report dated 22‑04‑2026. The Court …

RAMPYARE YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rampyare Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by …

SAKSHI TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sakshi Tiwari and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …

NARENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …

BRIJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijesh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by …

ZAMIR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

ASHU YADAV @ ASHISH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Ashu Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the case had already …

YOGENDRA MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Yogendra Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already …

IKRA BI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ikra Bi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

BHUPENDRA @ SHAHENSHAH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director …

MANISH VARSHNEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing …

KHURSHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the …

PRADEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Pradeep filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report from …

MURARI ALIAS KRISHNA MURARIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Murari alias Krishna Murari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had …

BABU ALIAS BABULALversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babu alias Babulal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already …

RAJEEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Rajeev filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the FIR registered against him. The petition was filed after the investigation had progressed and a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the police. The respondents, the State of …

NAUSHAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Naushad Khan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Advocate General, opposed the petition. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had …

ASGAR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Asgar Husain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 …

RIZWAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rizwan Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in …

SMT. RAJANI SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Rajani Shakya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director …

RAMPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the …

AKASH TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Akash Tyagi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that …

MAMTA BAJPAYEE @ MAMTA TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mamta Bajpayee and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet …

SAHIL MAGGU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sahil Maggu and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in …

SURENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by its Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the charge sheet in …

SAFI ULLAH @ NANKAU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Safi Ullah and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State submitted a charge sheet on 22 April 2026, as reflected in the legal cell’s report. The Court observed that the filing of the …

SAURABH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of a charge …

MOHD. ASIM AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd. Asim and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, appeared before the bench. The court noted that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed, as …

MUKESH KUMAR @ DR MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet …

TALIB AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Talib and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

GAURAV GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gaurav Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the non‑submission of a charge sheet in the case. The petitioner’s counsel noted that the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P., had sent information that a charge sheet had been filed, …

RAKESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Rakesh Chandra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had …

GOVIND NISHADversusState of UP AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Govind Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner representation present. The court noted that the charge …

MOHD ISLAM RAJAversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Islam Raja, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, but the petitioner was not present while the State's counsel appeared. The court noted that a charge sheet had already been filed, …

SMT NISHA PARAVEEN AND ANOTHERversusState of UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Nisha Paraveen and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge …

PAPPU AND 5 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

SMT GUDIYA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gudiya Devi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the …

ROHIT CHOUDHARYversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Rohit Choudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

ASHISH MOHANversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Mohan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that a charge sheet …

SURAJ MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Suraj Mishra and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

MAHENDRA YADAV AND 7 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet …

SEEMA DEVIversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Seema Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that a charge sheet …

RAVIKANTversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22‑04‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a …

NASIR HUSSAINversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel Brijesh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by G.A., submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already …

SMT SAPNA AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking compliance with the filing of a charge sheet. The High Court noted that the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, U.P., had sent information that a charge sheet had been filed, but the petitioner's counsel sought …

MAHTAB ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge sheet rendered …

ZULFUKAR AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Zulfukar Ahmad and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of …

SHAMEEM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shameem Ansari, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that the …

SWARN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Swarn Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court examined a report dated …

ANKIT KUMAR KHANDELWAL AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, …

MUBARAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mubarak, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner counsel appearing and the State represented by an Additional …

KULDEEP AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the police. The Court noted that …

CONSTABLE DRIVER AMJAD KHANversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Constable Driver Amjad Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by an AGA. The court noted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report from …

PRABHAVATI DEVI @ PRABHAVATI AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Prabhavati Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The High Court …

SAURABH @ SUNNY AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saurabh @ Sunny and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The respondents, the State of UP and two others, submitted a charge sheet in the underlying criminal case. The petitioners' counsel argued that the filing …

SMT SANA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Sana Khatoon and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

AMBUJ PANDEYversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ambuj Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 22 April 2026 from the Legal Cell of the …

JITENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of the charge-sheet …

SMT.SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted …

RAM NEWAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court observed that …

VINEET MISHRA @ BANTI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

RAMJAN ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ramjan Ali and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet had …

MAYANK SONKAR @ SHEETUversusSTATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mayank Sonkar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General …

RAVI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …

NARAYAN DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Narayan Das, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, but the petitioner was not present while the State's counsel appeared. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as …

ASHWANI SAGAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …

SMT. RUKHSAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Rukhsar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Director General of …

MOHD ARIF AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

SHIV BAHADUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the police had already …

SMT. ANJALI SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, through the Director General of Police's Legal Cell, submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The …

SANIYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saniya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed …

AVDESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Avdesh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised list before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court examined …

SMT. SRISHTI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Srishti and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State of U.P. submitted a charge‑sheet, and the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police reported that the charge‑sheet had been filed. The …

GAURAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. The Court …

SUHAIL AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Suhail Ahmad and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the …

MANISH KASHYAP AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Manish Kashyap and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet …

RAJEEV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026 from the Director General of …

ANURAG TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Anurag Tiwari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The High Court examined a report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. The Court held that once a charge‑sheet is filed, a writ petition seeking to quash the …

X (JUVENILE)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

A juvenile petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026. The …

RAVI KULSHRESHTHA @ RAVI KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that …

SMT. MAMTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Mamta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of …

MOHD WASEEM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …

ABHILAKH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Abhilakh Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑April‑2026 indicating that the …

VIKAS SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vikas Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet in the matter, as indicated by the report from the Director General of Police, U.P. The …

SANTOSH VARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Santosh Varma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a …

PREM CHAND PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court examined whether a writ petition questioning the FIR could be entertained after the …

SATYA DEV GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against them. The State submitted a charge‑sheet, as reflected in a report dated 16 April 2026. The petition sought to quash the FIR after the charge‑sheet had been filed. The Court observed that once a …

LAV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court examined a report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Usman filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's AGA was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet in the case had already been filed, …

SMT. RANVIRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Ranviri and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted …

RAJWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajwant Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

SHAILENDRA SINGH & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Shailendra Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet …

BADAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioners Badan Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. The Court …

HARIDWAR SINGH AND 5 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …

RAJESH AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the …

SMT SWATI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Swati and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the …

SMT VAISHALI AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Vaishali and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already …

RAKESH SHARMA AND 5 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Rakesh Sharma and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16-04-2026 indicating that …

SMT. SAVITA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Savita Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had …

SAURABH SINGHversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …

HARSHIT GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court noted that once a charge‑sheet is filed, the …

JAI SINGH AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jai Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026 from the …

UMA SHANKARversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16-04-2026 from the Legal Cell of the Director General …

ARSHAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionist Arshad Khan challenged a Family Court order granting his wife Rs 9,500 per month as maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., arguing that the amount was excessive given his net salary of Rs 36,500 and his responsibility to support his parents and siblings. He also contended that his …

KAMAL GAURAV SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Kamal Gaurav Sahu filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his arrest on 08‑02‑2026 and subsequent remand were illegal because the police failed to provide written grounds of arrest as mandated by the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent. The petition sought a writ of mandamus for …

ATISHAM HUSSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner No.1 was arrested on 08.02.2026 by the police without being furnished written grounds of arrest, contrary to Supreme Court pronouncements. The arrest memo and the subsequent remand order were prepared on a printed proforma, indicating a mechanical exercise of power. The petitioners …

MAHENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Mahendra, Bankey and Pappu (Mahipal) were convicted for the murder of Fateh Singh under IPC sections 302 and 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case relied on two eye‑witnesses, the son and brother of the deceased, and forensic evidence. The appellants challenged …

PAPPU @ MAHIPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Pappu @ Mahipal, filed Criminal Appeal No. 724 of 2006 against the State of U.P. The matter was heard by a bench comprising Hon’ble Justice Siddharth and Hon’ble Justice Jai Krishna Upadhyay of the Allahabad High Court. The court dismissed the appeal without providing detailed …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband, Sachin, married Kavita in 2010 and was later accused of demanding additional dowry, subjecting her to physical and mental abuse, and attempting to kill her. Kavita left the matrimonial home citing harassment and the husband subsequently entered a second marriage without divorcing her. …

SMT SONU DEVI AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Smt. Sonu Devi and her minor son against a Family Court order directing the husband, Vipin Kumar, to pay Rs.3,000 and Rs.2,000 per month respectively as maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband claimed a higher …

ARVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband Arvind Kumar appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs.3,000 per month to his wife Neelam Kumari under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife alleged that she was forced out of the matrimonial home due to physical and mental torture and dowry demands, and that …

SMT. VIJAY BHARTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Smt. Vijay Bharti and her two minor daughters seeking enhancement of maintenance awarded under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code against their husband, Prem Narayan Vyas, an accountant with GAIL. The trial court had fixed interim …