Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
220 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 32033 of 2026 filed by Maju @ Majid in Crime No. 347 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 329(3), 351(3) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant pleaded that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvindpal Singh, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 215 of 2024) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that he had approved a bank loan after a legal scrutiny report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Kumar, who is accused in a case under IPC sections 304(2), 317(2) and 317(4) arising from a FIR lodged after a delay. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and asserted that the FIR was filed without a plausible …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Akaram Shah, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 61, 318, 319, 336, 338, 351 and 352. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no money was …
Munna alias Shivaashray Yadav was arrested in connection with case crime No. 708 of 2026 under IPC sections 3(5), 115(2), 333 and 140(1). He contended that he had transferred Rs 12,00,000 to the victim, Manoj Kumar Pandey, for securing a railway job for his daughter, that the victim later returned …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Guddu Biyar in a criminal case (Crime No.127 of 2026) involving IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 309(4), 317(2) and 109. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR contains general and omnibus allegations and that both …
Anni Begum was arrested in connection with Crime No. 803 of 2025, alleged to have fraudulently obtained pension benefits of Rs. 24,000, which have already been recovered by the Government. She has been in custody since 3 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record, while her co‑accused have already …
The applicant, Naim Ahmad, a collection executive of Hero Finance Corporation Ltd., was arrested in connection with FIR No. 185 of 2026 under Section 316(5) and has been in jail since 19 August 2026. He filed a bail application, asserting innocence, lack of any complaint from the alleged aggrieved …
Lal Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0290 of 2023) where he is charged under Sections 401 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the allegations against him are false, that he was not present at the scene, and that his name appears only in a co‑accused’s confessional …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Dilshad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 35120 of 2026, seeking release in a case under Sections 310(2) and 61(2) of the IPC and CrPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that co‑accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz @ Ajmeri, who is accused in Crime No. 7 of 2026 under Sections 305(A), 317(2) and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 21 January …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gautam, who was implicated in a theft of electric wire case (Criminal No. 135 of 2026) under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, stating his name appeared only in a co‑accused's confession and …
Ramawadh @ Sheru Rajbhar applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3152 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 186 of 2020 under Sections 392 and 411 of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced later in an informant's statement recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aman, who had been in custody since August 8, 2024, in a case under IPC sections 109(1), 310(4), 310(6) and 317(5). The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, and had been detained for …
Vishal Soni applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 273 of 2025) where he was charged under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery of a motorcycle from his possession lacked …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sukhveer, who was arrested in Crime No. 192 of 2026 under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3) and CrPC section 61(2). The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that his name was added to the FIR based on an informer's tip and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aneesh Maratha in a case involving alleged theft of mobile phones and charges under IPC sections 310(2), 317(3), 112(2) and 317(5). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, the IMEI number of the alleged stolen phone was omitted, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abu Uwaida in a criminal case (Crime No. 0234 of 2026) under Sections 61(2), 310(2) and 317(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication based on a co‑accused's confession and lack of independent …
The applicant, Roop Kishore @ Rupa, was arrested in Crime No. 154 of 2025 under IPC sections 303(2) and 317(2), 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons and his name appeared only in the confessional statements of a co‑accused, with no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarvesh Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) and 333 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and pointed to the bail already granted to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Diwakar, who was in custody for offences under Sections 326(g) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that there was no injury, and that he would not misuse liberty if released. …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 33909 of 2026 filed by Anuj Verma, who is accused in Crime No. 12 of 2026 under Section 316(5) BNS. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, was falsely implicated, has deposited the disputed amount with the post office and has no prior …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Ashgar @ Ajgar and another accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 64 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 309(6), 331(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed innocence, alleged false …
The applicant, Ajay, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 820 of 2026) under IPC sections 331(4), 305 and 317(2) and had been in custody since 20 June 2026. He claimed that he was falsely implicated, that the alleged recovery was fabricated, and that there were no independent witnesses …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind Yadav, who is accused under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3) in a case registered at Police Station Tharvai, Prayagraj. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that only Rs.350 was recovered from his …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra @ Sheru and two others, who were in custody since July 8, 2026 for offences under Sections 305(a), 331(3), 317(2) and 112 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged against an unknown …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramhari Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 12 of 2026) involving several IPC offences including sections 316(2), 340(2), 336(3), 61(2), 338 and 318(4). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, was not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Poonam Devi, who was in custody for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that the dispute was essentially civil, and that she had no role …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mujayyan, who was in custody since 1 June 2026 in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 351(2), 338 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
Arun Kumar Agnihotri, accused in a 2020 fraud case (Crime No.12) under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, sought bail claiming he was falsely implicated and that the money was received by co‑accused Yashwant Verma. He alleged that he had no role in the alleged fraud involving Rs 2,72,000 and 1,650 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aalim Ali, who was in custody since 8 July 2026 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, with an earlier FIR under Section 409 later dropped. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that no …
Arvindpal Singh, a branch manager, was arrested in connection with a 2024 case (Crime No. 217) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. He filed a bail application, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the loan in question was sanctioned based on a report …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar Chaudhary, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29490 of 2026 seeking enlargement of bail in a case (Crime No. 313 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of fake currency. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, had no fake currency …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lakhan, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 57 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences. Lakhan claimed he was falsely implicated and that the dispute was essentially civil, citing a sale deed executed by the landowner. He had been in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikrant Prakash Singh, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 384 of 2025) based on confessional statements of co‑accused, though his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonakshi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 318(4), 61(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged marriage. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleging false implication due to an ulterior motive, and highlighted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naresh Kumar, who was implicated in a case under Sections 316(5), 317(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the Banking Regulation Act for alleged misappropriation of gold from a bank safe. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 324(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name was not in the FIR and was only mentioned in a co‑accused's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shreyjal @ Sujal, who was in judicial custody for a theft case (Crime No. 326 of 2025) involving the alleged snatching of an informant's bag. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that co‑accused Babu Pasi and Manish Chaturvedi had already …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramkaran, who was arrested in connection with a human trafficking case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33836 of 2026) involving IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 143, 145, 127(2) and 316(2). The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sheshnath Rajbhar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with an axe. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR and medical report were inconsistent and that no specific role was attributed to him. The …
Irfan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0095 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) and 112(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed absolute innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was found on him, and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Babli Urf Bablu in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only evidence against her was …
The applicant, Sonveer @ Sohanveer, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) alleging forgery of a sale deed and several offences under the Indian Penal Code, including sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2). He claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra Singh, who was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged sale deed. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad Alias Aashu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of a motorcycle. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that his name was added later in the …
The applicant, Raju Shah, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 141 of 2026) under IPC sections 309(6) and 317(2) and has been in custody since August 5, 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the only items recovered from him belonged to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amarjeet Singh, a bank branch manager, who was charged under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of Rs.1,00,000 in a fixed‑deposit transaction. The applicant asserted that the amount had been …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a snatching case (Crime No. 109 of 2026) under sections 309(4), 351(3), 317(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleged false …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 32948 of 2026 filed by Amarjeet Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 546 of 2023 under IPC sections 409, 120B, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that a Rs 10 lakh transfer alleged to be part of a …
The applicant, Nikit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a fresh one. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal, granting liberty to …
The applicant, Deepi, was arrested on 7 February 2026 in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) and 326(g) at Sajeti police station, Kanpur Nagar. He claimed that the FIR and charge sheet were filed with mala‑fide intent to harass him and his family, and that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Gulzar, accused in Criminal Case No. 451 of 2026 under Sections 61(2)Ka, 310(2), 311, 317(3), 317(5) and 336(2) of the IPC. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through the …
Kulwant Singh, an employee of the Defence Research and Development Organisation, was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) arising from a matrimonial dispute involving the informant's daughter. He applied for bail, claiming absolute innocence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishant, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 118(2) and 324(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudhakar and Surendra Bind, who were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 92 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and criminal conspiracy. The applicants claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jamal Kha in a criminal case (Crime No. 93 of 2026) involving offences under sections 115(2), 352, 109(1), 125, 324(4), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the aggressor could not be …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 279 and 304-A in two related FIRs. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that he was falsely implicated as a nominee of the insured, and highlighted his clean …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay Gautam @ Rahul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued that he was not named in the FIR, with only a weapon, cartridge, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Kushwaha, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 207 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences including sections 79, 75, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 317(2) and 304(2) BNS. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam @ Shiva @ Krishna, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 313 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318, 115, 127, 308, 351 and 3 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that his name only …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudhir in Criminal Case No. 139 of 2026, which is registered under Sections 309(4) and 317(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, his name having surfaced only in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ajay Verma, who was charged under Sections 74, 76, 333 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of medical evidence of assault and contradictions in the victim's statements …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shyama Devi, who was arrested in FIR No. 368 of 2025 under several IPC sections for allegedly selling a victim. She claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged by the victim herself and that co‑accused Rashid had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind Yadav, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 98 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 296, 333, 352, 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he is innocent, has no prior …
Kharpattu Chauhan was arrested in connection with Crime No. 0411 of 2025 under Section 316(5) BNS and filed a bail application claiming innocence and alleging false implication. The applicant offered to pay Rs. 3,46,009.57 to the informant within two months after release. The State opposed the bail …
The applicant, Sanno, was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 357 of 2026) involving IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352 and 333. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a material contradiction between the FIR, which attributes the injury …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Surendra Kumar, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 183 of 2026) under Sections 308(5), 308(6) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC for alleged extortion. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of cogent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajveer Singh, a former Revenue Inspector, who was arrested in connection with a land‑lease fraud case (Criminal No. 156 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farhan in a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No.28499 of 2026 filed by Mohd Azam, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No.104 of 2026) under several IPC sections including 61(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(2). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hashmat Husain, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 305 of 2026) under IPC sections 308(2), 336(3) and 338. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that he was not named in the FIR, and highlighted his poor economic status …
The High Court considered the bail application of Noor Mohammad, who was arrested in connection with Criminal Case No. 599 of 2025 under IPC sections 340(2), 336(3), 338, 318(4), 319(2) and 61(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged firm was registered in the name of …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aasim, who was arrested in Crime No. 501 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged sale deed. The applicant, represented by Senior Advocate N.I. Jafari and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vandana Joshi, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 245 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Joshi claimed she was falsely implicated, worked as an agent for Senemi …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pawan, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 383 of 2026 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant pleaded innocence, argued that the allegations were vague, and highlighted the absence of incriminating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Adesh, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 383 of 2026) under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of incriminating material, and no prior criminal record, while co-accused had already been granted bail. The State …
Yogesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 06 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 351(2), 352 and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He sought bail, claiming innocence and arguing that co‑accused who faced identical charges had already been released …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Singh Yadav, who was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 308, 318, 249, 221, 351, 196 and 61 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged on vague and unsubstantiated grounds …
Parmanand applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 34 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences, claiming innocence and alleging false implication due to a property dispute. The applicant had been in custody since July 18, 2026 and had no prior criminal record, while co-accused had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, who was arrested in Crime No. 176 of 2026 under Sections 333, 309(6) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and lack of independent evidence, and pointed out that he had no prior …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered bail application No. 32010 of 2026 filed by Rajendra Verma, who is in custody for offences under IPC sections 303(2), 324(2) and 317(2) arising from a theft case at Noida. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming he was falsely implicated and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajendra Verma, who is accused in Criminal Case No. 115 of 2026 under IPC Sections 303(2), 324(4) and 317(2). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that no incriminating material was recovered from him. …
The applicant, Hashim, was arrested in Crime No. 222 of 2026 under IPC sections 305‑A, 331(4) and 317(2) BNS for an alleged theft. He pleaded that he is innocent, that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and that the recovery alleged by the police is false, emphasizing his clean record and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Pasi, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 310(2), 317(3) and 317(4) of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the charge sheet had already been filed, and that co‑accused had already been …
The High Court considered the bail application of Hitlar, who is implicated in Crime No. 148 of 2026 under several IPC sections (191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 131, 126(2), 352, 61(2)). The applicant claims he is innocent, was not named in the FIR, and was only mentioned in a co‑accused's confessional …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt Priti Srivastava (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31851 of 2026) in connection with a pending trial (Crime No. 20 of 2026) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant asserted that she is innocent, falsely …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt. Priti Srivastava, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)Ka of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no …
The applicant, Arun, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 52 of 2026) alleging his involvement in the alleged snatching of jewellery from an informant's mother, with charges under Sections 309(4), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicant Mohit Tiwari filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31830 of 2026) seeking release pending trial in Crime No. 194 of 2026, which involves offences under IPC sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). He asserted that he is innocent, was not named in the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Subedar Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant, a 70‑year‑old illiterate man, claimed he was falsely implicated, had no involvement in the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Kumar in Criminal Case No. 313 of 2026, which alleged his involvement in extortion and impersonation of a police inspector under IPC sections 115, 127, 308 and 351. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of any …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandan Kumar Mishra, who was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a co-accused's confessional statement in a case under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant argued innocence, lack of substantive evidence, and …
The applicants, Fazal @ Bhola and Rizwan, were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 1103 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 109, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed they were falsely implicated, that the injuries to the alleged …
Bhairav Prasad Pathak was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 286 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. He had been in custody since 23 July 2024, amounting to more than two years of pre‑trial detention. The applicant contended that he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaya Prasad Vishwakarma in a case involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(4), 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and only mentioned in a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Himanshu Gupta, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 318(4), 338 and 336 BNS relating to alleged fraudulent vehicle sale and money transfer. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the prosecution’s evidence was contradictory, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ishwar, who was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 82 of 2025) under Sections 316(5) and 61(2). Ishwar claimed innocence and argued that co‑accused had already been released on bail, invoking parity. The State opposed the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was arrested in a case involving alleged fraud causing a loss of Rs. four crores and charged under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted no specific allegations against him, and highlighted that …
Shankar Singh Lodhi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 224 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 308(5), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, where the prosecution alleged he snatched Rs.10,000 and threatened to extort Rs.10 lakh. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Khushbu, who is accused in Criminal Case No. 87 of 2026 under IPC sections 137(2), 3(5), 142 and 143(4) for alleged child abduction. Counsel for the applicant contended that she is innocent, that there is no direct evidence against her, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhagwan Singh @ Bhoora Pradhan in a case under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the IPC relating to alleged GST document fraud. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only on hearsay, …
The applicants, Omveer and Kishanpal alias Kushanpal, were implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 130 of 2026) involving serious IPC offences including murder and attempt to murder. The first applicant, Omveer, had died, and the second applicant was in custody since May 27, 2026, with a criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23922 of 2026) filed by Omveer and Kishanpal alias Kushanpal, who were accused in a case under IPC sections 310(2), 317(3) and 61(2). The applicants claimed innocence, argued that the FIR named unknown persons and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiv Kumar and two others in a criminal case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, had …
Shailendra Kumar Shahi filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Sanjeev Kumar Singh, informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the bail application and requested its withdrawal, seeking liberty to file a fresh …
Mangal Singh, a Home Guard, was arrested on a FIR alleging that he stole a service revolver, invoking Sections 305(e) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, false implication, and lack of independent evidence, and has been in custody since 17 June 2026. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences including kidnapping, extortion and assault. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material was found on him, while the …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ramkailash, who is accused under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 in a case registered in 2017. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was only a witness to a sale agreement and that a co‑accused had already been granted bail, invoking …
Indrajeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) alleging embezzlement of pre‑deposit amounts of two bank customers, filed under Sections 316(5) and 351(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged by a bank …
The applicant, Hashmat Husain, was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 308(2), 336(3) and 338 and has been in custody since 08‑06‑2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that his involvement was discovered only during investigation. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jahid, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 248 of 2026) under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and pointed out the absence of independent witnesses, while noting that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Haneef, who is accused in a criminal case under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and pointed to the fact that co‑accused Javed and Abid had already been granted bail, seeking …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag Mishra, who was arrested in connection with FIR alleging assault and robbery under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he had no specific role, and highlighted that co‑accused had already been granted bail. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhim Rao, who is accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 in a land‑allotment dispute case. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he merely implemented an order as a consolidation Lekhpal and had no role in the alleged …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Suraj Thakur in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30419 of 2026, relating to FIR No. 231 of 2026 involving alleged extortion and multiple IPC offences. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and no evidence of …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Harsh @ Heera in a criminal case (Crime No. 11 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 309(6), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name surfaced only through the statement of a …
Vikas, the applicant, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 473 of 2026 under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3) and has been in jail since 21 June 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery from his possession lacked any independent …
The applicant, Nisar, was arrested in connection with a theft alleged to have occurred in a temple and is charged under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the co-accused Jubair had disclosed his name without …
Shivam Gupta, the adopted son of an informant, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) under Sections 305 and 317(2) of the IPC. He claimed the allegations were false, arising from a property dispute, and asserted he had no involvement in the alleged offences. The applicant, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kapil Rastogi, who is accused under Sections 418, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC in a case pending since 2022. The applicant claimed innocence, cited a compromise deed resolving the commercial dispute, and noted that a co‑accused's case had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kishan Alias Jaico in Criminal Case No. 485 of 2026, where he was charged under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for allegedly snatching an informant's bag. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krishna Chand Patel, who is accused in a case involving offences under IPC sections 305(a), 324(2), 351(3), 352, 331(4) and 317(2). The applicant claimed innocence, alleged a delayed FIR, lack of independent witnesses, and asserted that he would …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Manoj, who is accused in Crime No. 717 of 2025 under multiple IPC sections including 190, 191, 109, 115, 117, 131, 324, 333, 351 and 352. Manoj contended that he was never named in the FIR and was implicated only through an informer, …
The applicant, Ubaid Ulla, was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 103 of 2026) involving offences under IPC sections 318(2), 336(3), 338, and 340(2). He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no incriminating material recovered from his …
The High Court considered the bail application of Gulzar, who was in custody since 20 June 2026 in a case under IPC sections 109(1), 333, 131 and 351(3). The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the injuries were not life‑threatening, and that a co‑accused had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Nishad, who is accused in Crime No. 74 of 2026 under IPC sections 109(1), 117(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(4). The applicant pleaded innocence, citing a medical report that classified two injuries as simple and one as grievous, and argued that …
The applicant, Hitesh Agrawal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 855 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely an employee of the alleged company and had no criminal history, and …
Jitendra Sharma was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged fraud and cheating under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 506 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated, citing a partnership deed with the informant's wife and that a large part of the disputed amount had …
The applicant, Ritik Singh, was arrested on 21 June 2026 in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 302 of 2026, alleging offences under sections 305(A), 317(2), 318(4) and 3(5). He contended that the recovery of alleged incriminating material from his possession was false, there were no …
The applicant, Shivam Saxena, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 136 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences including sections 191, 109, 333, 115, 352, 351, 117 and 131 BNS. He claimed innocence, asserting that the FIR did not assign him a specific role and that the firearm …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ziauddin @ Guddu @ Muddi, who was in custody for offences under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged a delayed FIR, and pointed to the grant of anticipatory bail to a co‑accused. The State opposed bail but …
The applicants, Waseem and Asif, were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 143 of 2026) alleging misuse of an ATM card belonging to the informant's daughter, invoking Sections 303(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Hasan Asif, who was in custody since 9 June 2026 for offences alleged under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 112 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the forged mark‑sheet …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Srivastava, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 430 of 2025) under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the matter stemmed from a business dispute and that he would not …
The High Court considered the bail application of Brijesh Kumar, who is implicated in a criminal case under Sections 3(5), 61(2), 309(6) and 317(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the recovery alleged by the prosecution was fabricated …
The applicant, Shreyjal @ Sujal, was arrested in Criminal Case No. 219 of 2025 under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3), 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery of contraband from his possession lacked an independent witness. Although …
The applicant, Shreyjal @ Sujal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 329 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 310(2) and 317(3), 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery of contraband …
Deepee Upasana @ Jani was arrested in connection with case crime No. 0164 of 2026, alleged to have committed offences under IPC sections 308(5), 318(4), 351(3) and 317(2) and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the allegations …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankur Agrawal in a case involving alleged misappropriation of gold ornaments from a bank safe. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced later based on a co‑accused's confessional statement. The court noted that there …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Lakhan Singh in a 2014 FIR alleging misappropriation of scholarship funds, with charges under IPC sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet was filed without solid …
Jitendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 1199 of 2026) against the State of U.P. The applicant's counsel, Arunesh Datta, informed the court that the application had become infructuous and requested its dismissal. The court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sultan Alias Raju, accused under Sections 2B(1)(viii)(xi) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 39 of 2025. The applicant argued that he was implicated only through a solitary case in a gang …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahnawaj @ Seraj, who was arrested under Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Crime No. 165 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued lack of credible evidence, while the State opposed …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Dr. Ramkesh Yadav in a criminal case (Crime No. 0525 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 333 and 351(3) IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the FIR was lodged after a seven‑month delay without …
The applicant, Fakeer Chand, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 322 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that a charge sheet had already been filed against …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Chuiyya Ansari @ Mohd Fareed Ansari, who alleged false implication in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant argued that the charge sheet named a different person and that police …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Guddu @ Sachin Kumar Singh under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a POCSO case (Sections 7 and 8) and other charges. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false and frivolous FIR, and asserted no specific …
The applicant, Deepanshi Rajpoot, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a case (Crime No. 35 of 2026) alleging involvement in a road accident that resulted in charges under IPC Sections 105 and 238. She claimed innocence, stating she was a pillion rider with no control …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 73 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, lack of specific role in the FIR, and no criminal history, seeking protection from arrest. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 332 of 2025) under Sections 309(6) and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and lack of credible evidence, while the State opposed bail. The court, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Anurag Singh, who was arrested in connection with a property dispute case (Crime 223 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Kashyap in a criminal case (Crime No. 424 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 306 and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR and recovered articles were fabricated, and sought …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijaypal, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case for alleged possession of 2.94 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued …
The applicant, Pavan Bind, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed the charges were false and based on a planted recovery, arguing that his prolonged …
The applicant, Ibne Ali @ Shahrukh, was arrested in connection with Crime No.329 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated in a Rs.50 lakh demand case, that the alleged victim's recovery details were undisclosed, and that he had been …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 filed by Dr. Raj Roop, who claimed he was falsely implicated in a rape case and that the relationship with the victim was consensual. The applicant argued that the pending Section 528 application and lack …
The applicants, Saddam Husain and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 179 of 2025). They claimed innocence, alleging that the victim's statement under Section 180 CrPC showed no abduction or rape and that there was no credible …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shekhar Singh under Section 2(B)(i) 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, relating to Crime No. 70 of 2026. The applicant, already on bail in six other cases, argued he was not a gang member and posed no …
Shubham applied for bail in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he was falsely implicated and is not a gang member. He submitted copies of earlier bail orders in two other criminal matters and highlighted that a co‑accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazim Khan under Section 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release pending trial in Crime No. 278 of 2026. The applicant argued that he had already been granted bail in a related …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpraj Yadav (alias Shyam Yadav) in a narcotics case (Crime No. 789 of 2024) under Sections 8, 21, 27a and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that the heroin seized (17.45 g) was below commercial quantity, that the allegations were false, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Kumar Singh, who was arrested under Section 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no gang affiliation, and was already on bail in another …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shailendra Yadav, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Section 109(1) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Virendra Kumar, who was accused under IPC sections 69, 352 and 351(3) in a case involving a major‑age female victim. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvind Paswan, who was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no cow was …
The petitioners, Smt. Ikara and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 27/2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 111(2)(B), 308(5), 115(2), 351(3) and 317(2). They claimed innocence, asserted …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a murder‑related case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) where a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the FIR initially listed Sections 115(2), 140(1), 109 B.N.S. and later added …
The High Court considered a bail application filed on behalf of Sohil, who is charged in Crime No. 27 of 2025 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that he is not named in the FIR, has no prior convictions, and has been in custody …
The applicants, the wife of a deceased person and her family members, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 306 and 506 of the IPC. They claimed innocence, stating that the deceased died from poison ingestion and that …
The applicant, Sachin Goswami, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC, claiming he was falsely implicated in a fabricated FIR concerning a purported marital relationship. The counsel argued that …
The applicant, Yashraaj @ Yashpal Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where he was charged with offences under Sections 376 and 406 IPC. He claimed innocence, alleging a belated FIR, contradictions in statements, and no medical injuries to the victim. The …
The applicant, Mitthu Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 63/2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 8 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He claimed innocence and asserted that the allegations were …
The applicant, Indresh Singh Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 0344/2025) involving multiple IPC offences. He claimed innocence, asserted that he was not named in the FIR, and argued that no …
The applicant, Amit Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 175 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 105, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) arising from a property dispute. He claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sandhya (Pinky), sister of a co-accused, in a criminal case (Crime No. 233 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 108, 316(2) and 352. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, she posed no …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pushpendra Kumar, who is accused under IPC sections 498‑A, 304‑B and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case registered as Crime No. 65 of 2023. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, he …
Anchal Sharma filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 103(1), 238-A and 61(2) of the B.N.S. in Criminal Misc. No. 23 of 2026, claiming innocence and asserting that no offence was committed. The State, represented by the Advocate General, argued that the allegations against the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramdevi under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a death case (Crime No. 32 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the allegations against her were false, that she had no direct involvement, and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Raman under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under IPC sections 318(4), 111(2), 61(2) and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajni Tiwari in criminal case No. 697 of 2025, where she was charged under IPC sections 80, 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. She had already been granted interim anticipatory bail on 19 November …
The applicant, Mohd Hashim, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.209/2025) alleging false accusations under IPC Sections 87, 137(2) and 70(1). He claimed innocence, highlighted contradictory statements of the victim’s sister, and pointed to bail …
The applicant, Mauseem alias Mohsin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a summons dated 26.05.2022 in a case alleging offences under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. He claimed innocence, asserted that the allegations were false and that he had been exonerated during …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Kumar Divyant, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B for allegedly withdrawing post‑retirement benefits of a State Bank of India employee via an ATM card. The applicant contended that he was never named in the FIR, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 35494 of 2025 filed by Anuj @ Vinod Jatav @ Vinod, who was arrested in Crime No. 235 of 2024 under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no material had been recovered from him, and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Pal Singh in a 2013 case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant pleaded innocence, contended that the allegations were fabricated, and highlighted that the co‑accused had …
The applicant, Mohd Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and considered the application …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranu @ Rana Singh, who was arrested under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC in a case registered in 2006. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the police recovery was fabricated, and highlighted the absence of any eye‑witness or …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Parvez, accused in Crime No. 423 of 2025 under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and based solely on suspicion, and highlighted that he had previously been granted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pappu Chaubey (Aneesh Chaubey) in a case under IPC sections 310(2), 352 and 61(2) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of incriminating material, and cited that co‑accused had already been granted bail in similar cases. The State opposed …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshu Kumar Dubey, who was charged under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no recovery was made from his possession, and argued that there were no eye‑witnesses or …
The applicant, Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 277/2025) under IPC sections 109(1), 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated and argued that co‑accused who faced the same charges had already been granted bail, invoking the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramveer and another accused in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 191(2), 125, 115(2), 118(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kashyap, who was arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that his involvement was limited to assisting an informant in a …
The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 42906 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the application, the applicant died, as informed by his counsel, Pradeep Kumar Srivastava. The court considered whether the bail application could continue after …
The appellants Mahipal and others filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf to argue the appeal. The court received a report dated 27 April 2026 indicating that all the appellants had died, as confirmed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. Since …
The applicant Vinay Pratap filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared for the applicant and the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by Juvenile X, aged 17 years 11 months, seeking bail after being detained since August 2024. The revision challenged the order of the Child Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, which had denied bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by a juvenile (X) seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Children Court/Special Judge under the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile, who was in custody since June 2025, had no …
The applicant, Khalid, deposited Rs.2,00,000 as bail surety and later furnished fresh sureties and a personal bond as ordered by the court. He applied to the trial court for release of the deposited amount, but the application was rejected on the ground that the case had been committed to the …
