Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
220 judgments · newest first · showing 201–220
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by a 17‑year‑old juvenile seeking bail after orders of the Juvenile Court and Juvenile Justice Board denied it. The applicant argued that he had no criminal history, the DPO report raised no specific objections, and he had been confined for an …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Juvenile S, a 16‑year‑old accused under the POCSO Act, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Special Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, the …
The revision petition was filed by a 17‑year‑old juvenile who had been in a child observation home since November 2025, seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Special Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The petitioner alleged false implication, lack of incriminating evidence, and that the bail …
The applicant, Dev Mani Pandey, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑03‑2018 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the opposite party, who are living as husband and wife, executed a compromise …
The applicant, Gautam Vishwakarma, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction for an early decision in Criminal Case No. 74 of 2025, which arose from a 2019 domestic violence matter under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act. The case was pending before the Civil Judge …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNS seeking a direction to the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Pilibhit to promptly decide a discharge application dated 28‑01‑2026 in Session Trial No.1461 of 2025. The discharge application pertained to charges under Sections 131, 118(1), …
The applicant, M/s Om Bhawan Nirman Samagri, filed an application under Section 529 seeking the court to direct the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in Mathura to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (No. 1028 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The applicant …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking the court's direction for early disposal of a criminal trial (Case No. 73735 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 380, 411 and 457 of the IPC. The trial court had recorded the examination‑in‑chief of witness Anil Kumar on …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by a juvenile (aged 15 years, 10 months) seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Children's Court and Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, the FIR was lodged after an …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC challenging a summoning order dated 12‑07‑2017 and the underlying complaint (Case No. 1314 of 2016) alleging offences under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. They contended that the Judicial Magistrate had issued the …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No.4916 of 2017, alleging that the FIR was vague, the allegations were false, and the prosecution was malicious. The State opposed, contending that specific allegations were made …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑12‑2016 and the proceedings in a rape‑and‑criminal‑intimidation case (Sections 376D, 506 IPC). They argued that the FIR was false, that the victim’s statement indicated she was living with another man, and …
The applicants had purchased 210 eucalyptus trees through a railway tender and paid Rs.14.40 lakh. While collecting the trees on 9 November 2016, they were arrested by Railway Police and an FIR (Case Crime No.03 of 2016) was lodged under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. The FIR …
The revisionist, a minor, challenged the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) that transferred his case to a Children’s Court for trial as an adult under Sections 15 and 18(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. He argued that his age at the time of the alleged …
The applicants, led by Ajay Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 27‑01‑2017 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5070 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 147, 452, 323/149, 504 and 506 of the IPC. …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by X, a minor aged 14 years, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Special Additional Sessions Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, and that no grounds under …
The revision petition was filed by Juvenile X, a 16‑year‑old who had been in custody since May 2025, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Additional Sessions Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The petitioner alleged false implication, lack of criminal history, and an unduly long …
The revisionist, a juvenile of approximately 15 years and 6 months at the time of a heinous offence, was declared a juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board based on a medical report stating he was "about 16 years" old. The Board nonetheless referred him for trial as an adult under Section 15 of the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 04‑07‑2014 and the ensuing criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 249 of 2014, alleging that the complaint was fabricated and that a family‑court compromise had been reached. They contended …
The appellant, Gunge @ Deo Nath, filed Criminal Appeal No. 2874 of 1988 against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Jaunpur submitted a report dated 06‑02‑2026 indicating that the appellant had died, as confirmed by a report dated 07‑01‑2026. The High …
