Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
862 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicant, Vijay @ Bhura, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 116 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He had been in custody since 29 June 2026 and was implicated based on a gang chart that listed four other …
The applicant, Rajendra @ Babi, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle allegedly carrying spurious liquor, charged under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) of the BNS and Sections 60(1), 63, 72 of the Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no knowledge of the contraband, …
Manish Rajbhar was arrested under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 and has been in custody since 16 June 2026. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that he had already been granted bail in two other criminal cases cited in a …
The applicant, Shashank Bajaj, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart and noting that he had already been granted bail in three related …
The applicant, Shubhan, was charged under Sections 64(1), 77, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Section 67A of the I.T. Act for allegedly circulating an explicit video of the victim on Instagram. The applicant sought bail, arguing that the victim’s statements recorded during trial differed from earlier …
Lavkush applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 179 of 2026) involving alleged offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not the driver of the vehicle, and that the only allegation was a minor …
The applicant, Aadil, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 68 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court noted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and his alleged involvement was based primarily …
Santosh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 22 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 49, 317(5), 318(4), 351(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The court considered the facts, the applicant’s clean criminal record, and the …
Manjeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 146 of 2026) under Section 318(4) of the BNS and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, alleging involvement in a financial fraud. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no money was ever transferred to his bank account, and …
The applicant, Nadeem, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(b)(1)(17) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart and citing prior bail in two other criminal matters. He had been in custody …
Santosh Kumar Saroj applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and was only accused because he owned the …
Suneel Rajpoot applied for bail in a case registered as Crime No. 03 of 2024, involving alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 120‑B of the IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only basis for …
Kartik applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 523 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, Section 109(1) of the BNS Act, and Sections 3, 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Gaurav, had already been released on bail in a …
The applicant, Tasneem @ Tasleem, applied for bail in an arms‑related case (Crime No. 111 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5, 9, 25, 29 and 26(2) of the Arms Act. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement rested mainly on a confessional statement of a …
Aman Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 22 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 49, 317(5), 318(4), 351(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The court considered the facts, the evidence, the fact that a co‑accused, Satyam Singh, …
The applicant, Salman, was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act in a case registered at Airport police station, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Jamila in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 156 grams of alprazolam, slightly above the commercial quantity threshold. The court noted the absence of independent public witnesses, the pending …
Yuvraj Singh applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 144 of 2026, charged under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co-accused, Sarvesh @ Rahul Singh, had already been granted bail in a similar case. The court examined the material on record, …
Dilip Kumar filed an application to cancel the bail of four accused (Kuldeep Yadav, Ratan Singh @ Suneel Yadav, Chintamani and Vikas Yadav) alleging that they were threatening him to prevent his deposition before the trial court, and he had lodged two FIRs against them. The accused argued that the …
The applicant, Shahid, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 278 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Bharat Bhooshan, informed the court that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The opposing counsel, G.A., raised no objection to this …
Israr filed an application to cancel the bail granted to Suhail in a criminal case involving sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The applicant alleged that Suhail was threatening him to force a settlement and had complained to the Senior Superintendent of Police. The respondent argued that no …
Ibrahim Ansari applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Information Technology Act and the Aadhaar Card Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that no fake driving licence was recovered from him and that the two laptops seized were not …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohd Irfan, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 317(2), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 276 of 2026. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of …
Husain applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 358 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 66C & 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR lacked any named victim and …
The applicant, Atahar Hasan Saiyed, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging violations of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act for misbranding of a tablet called 'Safetrin-20'. The prosecution alleged that the tablet contained 9.9 mg of Isotretinoin per tablet, exceeding the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sunil Gupta, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he had been falsely implicated, citing a gang chart and noting …
Jai Prakash Gaud was detained since 22 May 2025 in Crime No. 85 of 2026 under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated because no cow was actually slaughtered or injured and that he has no prior criminal record. The State …
The applicant, Smt Preeti, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, where the prosecution alleged possession of 172 g of Alprazolam. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that no contraband was …
The applicant, Serajuddin Quraishi, was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 0304 of 2026, Chandauli. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court examined the facts, the evidence, and noted that a co‑accused, …
The applicant, Shahrukh, sought bail in a NDNDPS case (Criminal No. 65 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court examined the facts, the applicant’s criminal history, and noted that a co‑accused, Pravej, had already been released on bail in a related application. …
Badal applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 523 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, Section 109(1) of the BNS, and Sections 3, 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, Gaurav, had …
The applicant, Sufiyan @ Sofiyan, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and citing a single prior criminal case for which he had already been released on bail. He had …
The applicant, Mainuddin, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 540 of 2026) involving alleged offenses under Sections 126(2), 75, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 5 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. Counsel argued that the allegations were false, asserting that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Rajbhar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS and Section 18 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated she left …
Monu applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart. The applicant argued that he had already been granted bail in two related cases and that his alleged criminal …
Modebe Ookpo Joseph applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 70 of 2024) where he is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B, 201 and IT Act section 66. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and noted that a co‑accused, Sunday Okonkwo, had already been released on …
Nitesh Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 385 of 2026, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co‑accused, Tejas Pal, had already been released on bail in a similar case. The court …
The applicant, Amit, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.306 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The High Court examined the facts, the applicant’s clean record, and the fact that co‑accused Rambabu @ Pappu and Abhishek had …
Ashish and Ajay applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 306 of 2026, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicants argued that bail could not be granted in other pending cases concerning the same alleged offence. …
The applicant, Akku @ Anukalp Sharma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 324 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed false implication, citing a gang chart and an earlier bail in another case, and explained his …
Sanju Jaiswar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0031 of 2023) where he is charged under IPC sections 363, 364A, 302 and 201. His first bail application was rejected on 8 July 2025. In the second application, the court noted that a co‑accused, Vikas Singh Patel, had already been released …
Javed Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 906 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a gang chart and noting that he had already been granted bail in two …
Amit Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 77 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 498-A, 304-B and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. This was his second bail application, the first having been rejected on 26.08.2025. The applicant's counsel submitted a second …
The applicant sought cancellation of bail granted to the accused (opposite party No.2) on the ground that the accused misused the bail by threatening the applicant, who is a key witness, and that an FIR had been filed against the accused and his wife. The accused contended that the FIR lacked …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohd Asad @ Asaad @ Kaliya, who is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120B, 147, 148, 149, 286, 307, 386, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Mohd Faizan, in a similarly placed case …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upendra Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 351(3) of the B.N.S., 67 of the Income Tax Act and Sections 13 and 14 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed that the alleged offence stemmed from a consensual …
The applicant, Sanjay Bharti, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant, Sarthak Verma, requested that the matter be listed for filing a supplementary affidavit to explain the applicant's criminal history. The court, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sabir, who was arrested under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 104.4 grams of alprazolam. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the …
The applicant, Upendra Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have sent photographs of a minor. He contended that the relationship was consensual, the victim had married him, and her age had been …
Ezad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 458 of 2025) arising from a police firing incident in which he sustained a gunshot injury in the cross‑fire. The charges were under Section 109 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/25(1‑B)A/27 and 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant’s criminal history was …
The applicant, Mrityunjay Rajbhar, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No.38 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the case was based on a single criminal charge shown in a gang …
Waseem was arrested in connection with Crime No.10 of 2026 under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 27 of the Arms Act for alleged possession of a country-made pistol and recovered ornaments. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the recovery was fabricated, …
The High Court considered the bail application of Rihan Khan, who is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 38 of the Aadhaar Act for an alleged fraud involving a Rs.2,000 transfer. The applicant pleaded innocence, described the allegations as petty, and pointed to a history of …
The applicant, Rajkapoor Gihar, was injured in a police firing cross‑fire and is charged under Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial (Case Crime No. 167 of 2026). The court …
The applicant, Dhiraj Shaw, was arrested on 11 May 2026 for alleged possession of 25.1 kg of ganja, seized in 12 packets, under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, alleging that the quantity was inflated by …
Aazad Rajpoot applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.90 of 2026) charged under Sections 152, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 5 of the Official Secret Act, 1923. The application was heard by the Allahabad High Court, which noted that a co‑accused, Ajeem Rana, had already been released …
Akshay Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case involving multiple offences under the IPC, the Banking and Negotiable Instruments Act and the Income Tax Act. He argued that a co‑accused, Ashwani Jadaun, with an identical role and no prior record had been granted bail, and therefore parity …
The applicant, Khalil @ Faridi, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 444 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The co‑accused, Anees Ahmed, had made a confessional statement implicating the applicant, but the court held that such a …
Shailendra Kumar Verma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case where he was accused of forging documents to transfer title of property belonging to his sister (the informant). The prosecution alleged that the applicant illegally obtained the title …
Manju (Phoolwati) applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0162 of 2026) where she is charged under several IPC sections and sections 17 and 18 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, alleged to have trafficked a woman and sold her for Rs. 1 lakh. The applicant claimed …
The applicant, Kousar, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the prosecution was based on police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He claimed he had already been granted bail …
The applicant, Sujeet Kumar, was charged under Sections 137(2), 127(2), 143(1), 3(5) of the BNS, Sections 9 and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Ritu Devi, …
Vikas Pandur Pandey applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 601 of 2026) filed under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case in a gang chart for which he had already …
The applicant, Hasnavi, sought bail in an arms case (Crime No. 05 of 2025) under Sections 109 BNS, 3/25(1‑B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was injured in police cross‑fire. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the applicant's criminal history, which was explained, and noted …
The applicant Jagpal applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 415 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Saran, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that Jagpal had no prior criminal …
The applicant, Chandramani @ Dablu Pandey, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 79 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court considered the applicant's criminal history, the absence of any contraband recovered from him, and the fact that the only incriminating evidence was the …
The applicant, Saleem, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 597 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, pending trial at the Bareilly police station. The court noted that a co‑accused, Shakir, had previously been released on …
Alok Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 711 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vinay Sahani, had already been released …
The applicant, Sadik @ Lallu, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 320 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution pointed to the applicant’s name appearing in a co‑accused’s confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The court held that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Ramwati, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that she had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry, had no …
The applicant Pawan Kumar applied for bail in Crime No. 03 of 2026, charged under sections 318(4) and 317(5) of the BNS and section 66D of the I.T. Act, arising from a cyber‑crime investigation. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Sonu Singh, had already been released on bail in a similar case …
The applicant, Sadik @ Lallu, sought bail in a case registered as Crime No. 8 of 2026 under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The State opposed bail, relying on a confessional statement of a co‑accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The court examined the evidentiary value of such a …
Rashid @ Dangal was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 and has been in custody since 10 January 2026. He applied for bail, contending that he was falsely implicated and that his prior criminal history had already resulted in bail in …
Ajay Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 76 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 61(2) and 99 of the BNS Act, Sections 3 to 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The High Court considered the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of …
The applicant, Ravi Sahimani, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 141 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 49, 70(2), 74, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated …
Chhedi alias Shiv Shankar Seth, charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376-D and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6, has been in custody since July 2018. He filed a second bail application, alleging that the FIR was false because the victim was in love with him and the case was fabricated to obtain money, …
Ravindra Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.14 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 123, 303(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the FIR was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohil, who is charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 352, 64 and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had given a consensual statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. and …
Suraj Verma applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 201 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of the BNS, arising from a failed consensual relationship with a 22‑year‑old woman. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had misled or deceived the victim, while …
Mastram was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the alleged victim, though stated to be 16, appeared to be a major and that an ossification test placed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, aged 15‑16 years according to an ossification test, claimed to be a consenting party, had …
The applicant, Sahid, was arrested in Crime No. 326 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and has been in custody since 15 July 2026. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahesh Prasad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had consented to the relationship …
The applicant, Abuzar, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal record. He had been in custody since 14 August …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jaki, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party as per her …
The applicant, Atul Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 266 of 2026) involving sections 64(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. He argued that the allegations arose from a consensual relationship and that the victim's testimony lacked credibility, also highlighting an unexplained …
The applicant, Rajesh, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 450 cartons of illegal liquor and charged under Sections 60, 63 and 72 of the U.P. Excise Act and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was merely the driver of the vehicle, had no role …
The applicant, Mohammad Arif, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication due to police rivalry and asserting that he is not a gang member. He had already been granted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj, who was arrested in a case registered as Crime No. 137 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old girl, was a consenting …
Armaan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 248 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely …
Palturam Nagar applied for bail in a case filed under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had already been granted bail in a related gang‑chart case. He had been in custody …
Adarsh Vishwakarma was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 and has been in custody since 10 March 2026. He filed a bail application claiming that the charges were based on a fabricated gang chart and that he had already been granted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankur Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim, who appeared to be a major, had …
Vinay Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 711 of 2026) where he was charged under IPC sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) and IT Act sections 66(C) and 66(D). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no money was transferred to his account, and that the FIR …
The applicant, Rashid, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.151 of 2026) involving offences under Section 109(1) BNS of the IPC and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed, pointing out that the applicant’s prior criminal history – involving three earlier bail cases and a …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Deepak, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, who stated she was 17 but appeared …
The applicant, Rahul alias Akash, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.259 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he was not a gang member. He …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ram Chhail Sharma, who was arrested under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 0159 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a gang chart …
Minsari Bai applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Crime No.102 of 2026) involving alleged possession of 7.9 kg of ganja, which is below commercial quantity. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and highlighted non‑compliance with mandatory provisions of Sections 52A and 57 of the …
Krishna Prasad, a 20‑year‑old with no prior record, was arrested on 06‑07‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 200 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the …
The applicant, Tushar @ Nikki, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim had voluntarily stayed with him, as reflected in her …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Yogesh, accused in Crime No. 55 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged victim, though 17 years old, appeared to …
Nazim was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 76 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 89, 238, 351(3), 127(2), 64(2)F of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, who was initially a material witness, later recanted her statement, claiming she had …
Pawan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.409 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. He contended that the FIR was lodged two and a half years after the alleged petty transactions, …
The applicant, Taha Parvez, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 122 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS indicated that she had travelled …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish, accused in Crime No. 420 of 2026 under IPC sections 87, 64(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, had travelled with the applicant, stayed at his house and, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a second bail application filed by Vijan Pal, who had been in custody since August 19, 2023, in a case registered as Crime No.421 of 2023 under Sections 498A, 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that his …
Peer Mohammad applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the BNS, POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted the victim's consent, and pointed out the absence of any incriminating …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Virendra under Sections 8, 20(b) and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The applicant argued that the police had mishandled the seized contraband, citing a discrepancy in the number of packets sent …
The applicant, Nitin, was arrested and charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in a case registered at Titavi police station, Muzaffarnagar. He contended that the charges were based on a fabricated gang chart and that his prior criminal …
The applicant, Chaman Chaurasiya, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a gang chart that linked him to five other criminal cases for which he …
The applicant, Rameshvar Dayal, was charged in Crime No. 0146 of 2026 under multiple sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, submitting two supplementary affidavits. The court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting …
The applicant, Rajpal, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle from which acetic anhydride, a precursor chemical, was seized under Crime No. 93 of 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the seized substance does not constitute a banned narcotic under the NDPS Act. The counsel …
The applicant, Raju Khan, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 277 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, alleging possession of a quantity below commercial threshold. The court examined the nature of the offence, the severity …
Kisanpal alias Kushanpal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 136 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, Manoj, had already been granted bail …
Kamlesh Chauhan applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the prosecution was based on police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He has five prior criminal cases and has been in …
Naushad applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 83 of 2024) alleging false implication and asserting that he was not the primary offender, which was identified as Mohammad Aasif alias Mohammad Sippa. He highlighted that no money had been transferred to his account and that a co‑accused, …
Aakash Gangwar was charged in Crime No. 337 of 2026 under Sections 61(2) and 318(4) of the BNS and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the material on record, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, …
Prashant Kumar @ Tillu was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 245 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, including a alleged deposit of Rs. 1.5 lakh in his account. The …
The applicant, Deepak alias Bhopa, sought bail in a case registered as Crime No. 1084 of 2025 under Section 140(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident and there was no medical evidence to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishu Kashyap, who was arrested in a narcotics case (Crime No. 297 of 2026) under Sections 8, 22, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the police had falsely implicated him and that his name appeared only in a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yusuf, who was arrested in a narcotics case (Crime No. 233 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 1.1 kg of charas. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the seized quantity was …
The applicant, Pawan, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 159 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The High Court considered the fact that a co‑accused, Amit Kumar, had already been released on bail in a similar case and …
Raj Gupta was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.184 of 2026) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 352, 351(3) and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting a one‑day delay in filing the FIR and that the alleged victim …
Arman applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No.04 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 61(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66 and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant’s criminal history was explained and the court noted that a co‑accused, Harsh Vardhan …
The applicant Rajesh filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in related cases. He had been in custody …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prithvi Pal @ Chauhan in a criminal case (Crime No.101 of 2026) under IPC section 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication by a cousin and highlighted a two‑day delay in filing the FIR …
The applicant, Waseema, was arrested in connection with a case under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5, 8) and the Arms Act (sections 4, 25) for allegedly possessing 75 kg of beef and firearms. She contended that she was falsely implicated, is a homemaker with no prior criminal …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Brijesh Srivastava in NDPS case No. 162 of 2026, where 450 grams of opium—below the commercial quantity—had been seized. The applicant pleaded absolute innocence, alleging false recovery and highlighted that the mandatory provisions of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yashpal in a narcotics case (Crime No. 162 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act, where 650 grams of opium—below commercial quantity—had been seized. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and pointed out …
Aman Shekh was arrested in connection with Crime No. 378 of 2026, charged under Sections 318(4) and 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code (BNS) and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. He contended that he is a labourer who was merely used as a mule by co‑accused and has no criminal record. The …
Jagdish was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act for offences alleged to have occurred at Kotwali Tirwa, Kannauj. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and …
The applicant, Naseem, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in three related cases. He …
The applicant, Asraf, was arrested on 27 July 2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 352 of 2026) involving alleged violations of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Arms Act, and sections of the B.N.S. He pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and no prior criminal …
Vinod Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 238 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant has no prior criminal record. The learned counsel highlighted that a …
Vishal Pawar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 222 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record. The learned counsel …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom Singh, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Crime No. 425 of 2026) for alleged possession of 10.118 kg of ganja. The applicant's counsel argued that the recovery was below commercial quantity, that mandatory provisions of Sections …
Yogesh Meena applied for bail in a criminal case (FIR No.158 of 2026) involving multiple offences under the BNS Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court considered the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Abhay, had already been granted bail in a similar case. The …
Rupesh Rai was charged under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act in Crime No. 149 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, submitting a supplementary affidavit. The Court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and …
The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had no prior criminal record aside from …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Smt. Rihana in NDPS case No. 592 of 2026, where the FIR alleged recovery of 5.108 kg of ganja from her joint possession. The applicant pleaded absolute innocence, contending that the police had falsely implicated her, that the seized …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Khurshid in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case where the FIR alleged recovery of 5.108 kg of ganja from his joint possession with a co‑accused. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicant, Devendra Singh (alias Chhotu), filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 492 of 2023, charged under Sections 376, 506, 120B of the IPC and Sections 16, 17, 3, 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, argued that no cogent evidence existed against him and that he had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajkumar Verma in a criminal case (Crime No. 318 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., 5(m)/6 of the P.O.C.S.O. Act and 3(2)(v) of the S.C./S.T. Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was …
Vikash @ Tillar applied for bail in a case involving offences under Sections 126(2), 352, 115(2), 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant had already had two earlier bail applications rejected and had been in judicial custody for about thirteen …
Shama Parveen applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Shaista, had already been released on bail in a similar case and that the applicant had no prior criminal record. After hearing counsel for both sides, …
The applicant, Mohit, was arrested in Crime No. 555 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and has been in custody since 5 August 2026. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single entry in a gang chart, that he had …
The applicant, Abhishek Prajapati, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 172 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the case was based on a single entry in a gang chart, …
Sachin applied for bail in Criminal Case No.207 of 2026, facing a slew of charges under the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court noted that co‑accused Monu Singh and Vikash had already been granted bail in a similar …
Shivmangal applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8, 20 and 60) where he was alleged to be the intended recipient of contraband. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the only link to the case was a confessional statement of a co‑accused, which the court held has no evidentiary value. …
Smt. Soniya Sangwan applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. She contended that the prosecution was based on two earlier cases for which she had already been granted bail and that the present charge …
Mukrim @ Mukarram applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on five other criminal cases for which he had already been released on bail, and that he was falsely …
The applicant, Shashi Bind Rajbhar, filed a bail application in a case registered under Section 2(b)(1)/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in two …
Jai Singh Patel applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) under Sections 318(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3), 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Ravi Prakash, had already been released on bail in a …
Jitendra Kumar Patel applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32895 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 362 of 2026 under Sections 318(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3), 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The court noted that a co‑accused, Ravi …
The applicant, Sahil, filed a bail application in a case under Section 2/3(B)(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no criminal history. He had been in custody since 13 August 2026 and …
The applicant, Ashfaq@ Ashwaaq, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 444 of 2026) under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged involvement stemmed only from a confessional statement of …
The applicant, Rohin Tyagi, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging innocence and lack of cogent evidence. He argued that he had been detained since 20 August 2026 and was willing to cooperate with the …
The applicant, Abrar, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act. The first bail plea was rejected because of the victim's injury, but subsequently three key …
The applicants, Raj Singh Gautam and Aman Singh, were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 2.67 grams and 2.147 grams of ganja. They contended that the seized quantity was below the commercial …
The applicant, Durvesh @ Tunda, applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 351(2), 140(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M/6 of the P.O.C.S.O. Act. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that the key witnesses (PW‑1 to PW‑4) had turned hostile and rescinded their earlier statements. The …
The applicant, Sagar Chauhan, was charged in Crime No. 452 of 2026 under several provisions of the Information Technology Act, including sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) BNS and 66D. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, asserting that he has no prior criminal record. The …
Ahsan, the applicant, sought bail in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He had previously been granted bail in 2009, cooperated with the trial until 2019, but could not attend thereafter and surrendered on 13 August 2026, remaining in …
Dinesh Yadav applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 132 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Passport Act, 1967. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that his documents were never handed to co‑accused Monu Yadav, who is alleged to have …
The applicant, Bharat Tevatiya, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and claiming he is not a gang member. He argued that he had already been granted bail in related cases and that …
Kuldeep Rajput applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.117 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 288 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, …
Naresh Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.23 of 2026) involving charges under Section 351(3) of the IPC, Sections 62/64(2) of the B.N.S., and Section 67A of the Income Tax Act. This was his second bail application after a prior denial on 18.05.2026. The applicant's counsel could not …
The applicant, Ashif, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, alleging false implication. The prosecution recovered 60 kg of beef from a co‑accused, but no forensic report established that the meat was from a cow. The applicant had no prior …
The applicant, Dhirendra Singh, sought bail in a case under Sections 5 and 25 of the Arms Act, alleging innocence and claiming that the recovery of a country‑made pistol and related tools from his possession was false. He had been in custody since 12 August 2026 and had no prior criminal record. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Narendra Kumar (also known as Naresh Kumar) in a NDPS case (Crime No. 0151 of 2026) where he was not named in the FIR but was mentioned in the confessional statement of co‑accused Pannalal Lodhi under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The applicant …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt. Geeta, who was arrested in a case under Section 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that she had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry, had no …
The applicant, Izhaar, sought bail in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 171 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the recovery memo lacked the mandatory signature of the Tehsildar, rendering the seizure procedurally defective. …
Ramkumar @ Bhola filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 34 of 2025) involving charges under sections 65(1), 127(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act, sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, and section 67A of the Income Tax Act. The first bail application had been rejected. The applicant’s …
The applicants, Mohd Hasan and Kafil, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 229 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. They argued that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case each shown in a gang chart, for …
Ballu Khan applied for bail in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication and lack of substantive evidence. The applicant's only incriminating material was a confessional statement, which the counsel argued is inadmissible. The court examined the nature of the …
The applicants, Arjun Kumar Balmiki and Ankit Kumar Balmiki, sought bail under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, while their trial was pending. They argued that they had already been granted bail in related criminal cases and would not …
The applicant, Oviash @ Ka, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 775 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that his inclusion in the case was based on a gang chart that incorrectly linked him to a single …
The applicant, Sharafat Khan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 297 of 2026) under Sections 8, 22, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, alleging that he was merely a pillion rider and had no conscious possession of the contraband recovered from the vehicle owned by co-accused Mohsin. Counsel argued …
Amit Gangwar applied for bail for the fourth time in a case registered as Crime No. 721 of 2024, involving charges under sections 64(2)(ड), 65(1), 69 of the BNS Act, sections 4(2), 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act and section 66 of the I.T. Act. Earlier three bail applications had been rejected. The learned …
The applicant, Saurabh, was charged under several provisions of the Excise Act and the BNS in a criminal case pending trial. He applied for bail, arguing lack of criminal history and citing that a co-accused, Satya Prakash, had already been granted bail by a coordinate bench. The court examined the …
Umang alias Vishal alias Shazeb applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 20 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336, 338, 340(2) of the BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, filed by the Cyber Crime Police Station, Muzaffarnagar. The applicant argued …
Balram @ Balla was arrested under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in connection with a case registered at Basrehar police station, Etawah. He applied for bail, contending that his inclusion in a gang chart was false and that he had already …
Ranjeet applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 152 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He alleged that his inclusion in a gang chart was false and that he had already been granted bail in a related case, yet …
Phool Prakash applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) charged under Sections 318(2) and 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions …
The applicant, Danish, was charged under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act in a case registered at Jhinjhana police station, Shamli. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Nakim, had already been released on bail in a similar case and that Danish …
Lalta Prasad @ Guddu applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 4, 8, 13(1), 13(2) and 13(5) of the Public Examination Act. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, Deepak Patel, had already been released on bail in a …
The applicant, Chhote Lal Yadav, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 353 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, alleging possession of 2.5 kg of ganja. The court examined the facts, including the quantity being below …
The applicant, Narendra Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 8, 18 and 29 of the NDPS Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated as the intended recipient of contraband. The sole evidence against him was the confessional statement of co‑accused persons, which the counsel argued is …
The applicants, Gaurav and Raju, applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 40 of 2026, charged under multiple sections of the BNS and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court considered the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that co‑accused Sumit and Bhupendra had …
Suraj, a licensed Airtel Point of Sale (POS) agent, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 0042 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 66 and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. He contended that he …
The applicant, Indresh Kumar Singh, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 63 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 22 of the NDPS Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vineet Singh, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior criminal record. Relying on …
The applicant, Amit Kumar Singh, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 63 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vineet Singh, had already been granted bail in a similar case, establishing parity. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.354 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
Rahul Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 275 of 2024) filed under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were the result of police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail in two …
The applicant Rajan sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.158 of 2026) alleging gang rape under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused Manish lured the victim to a field where Rajan and Vikas …
Shamshad, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested on 7 June 2026 in connection with Crime No. 280 of 2026 under Section 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code (BNS) and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, asserting that the FIR was filed six hours after the alleged incident and …
The applicant, Gautam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 64, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was lodged 21 days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim appeared to be a major …
Virendra Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0014 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 3(5) of the IPC and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co‑accused, Ashish Patwa, had already …
The applicant, Jitendra Patel, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.287 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS, which indicated …
Manish Arya, the step‑father of the victim, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64(2)M, 76, 115(2), 351(3) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was delayed by seventeen days, and that the investigating officer had not …
