Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
862 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
Yogesh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 409 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yashwant Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 64(1), 333, 352, 351(3) and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Mehdawal. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old, had given a …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 28764 of 2026 filed by Ankit @ Sachin Saroj, who was arrested in Crime No.135 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant alleged that the alleged victim, aged 16‑18 as …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Anas under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under several IPC sections, including 115(2), 352, 351(2), 308(5), 309(4) and 61(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in a false …
Shahrukh, also known as Sonu, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 87 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim is a major, approximately 18 years old, and the prosecution has not produced any conclusive evidence that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by the accused (referred to as Rahul) in a criminal case (Crime No. 337 of 2025) involving charges under Section 65(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, Sections 9 and 10 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2006, and Section 75 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Crime No. 492 of 2026) alleging sexual offences under Sections 64(2)(M), 65(1), 87 of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4(2), 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the alleged …
Sikesh Paswan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) under Section 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual assault. The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting party, there was no medical evidence of …
Aman Nishad was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, arguing that the victim's statement was unreliable, the FIR was filed a day after the alleged incident, and there was …
The applicant, Tarachandra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 139 of 2026) under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging a false promise of marriage to a married adult woman. The prosecution alleged that the applicant established a corporeal relationship with the victim …
Harsh Shrivas, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, noting a two‑month delay in filing the FIR and the absence of any …
Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.357 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 3366, 376(2)(n) and Section 51/6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim, who had married him and bore his child, had given a consent …
The applicant, Ikhlak, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 246 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 64(2) and 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a consenting party, denied any sexual assault …
The applicant, Rajan Saini, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29809 of 2026, seeking release in case No. 161 of 2026 which involves charges under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act, 2012. The State Law Officer informed the …
The applicant, Kasif, was charged in Crime No.183 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 65(1) and 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the P.O.C.S.O. Act for alleged offences arising from a trip with the victim. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajan @ Pardesi, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a sexual relationship with a major victim under a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged deception, while …
Vipin applied for bail in criminal case No.109 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 137(2), 143(4), 98, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The applicant was not named by the victim in statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. The court …
The applicant Rahul sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and a ten‑day delay in filing the FIR without explanation. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the delay, …
Aakash Rajbhar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 477 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, an 18‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicating consent and had …
Ravi Kumar, accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012, applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The State Law Officer informed the court that a notice to the informant had been served but the informant did not appear. The victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sabalu in a case registered under Sections 74, 331(4), 351(3), 64(1) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The court noted an inordinate delay of more than one day in lodging the FIR and observed that the alleged victim appeared to be a consenting …
Santosh @ Soti applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 501 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S., 2023. The FIR was lodged about seven days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 indicated her consent. The court examined the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanoj Chaudhary, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, highlighted a fifteen‑hour …
Vivek, a 20‑year‑old accused, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64(1), 77, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident without any explanation, and that no indecent photographs or video of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sufiyan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 87 of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim is a consenting adult who …
The applicant, Vikash Sahini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.281 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that no photographic or video evidence of the victim was recovered and that he has no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jatin, who was arrested on 28‑06‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 660 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The applicant, Dharmendra, was charged in Crime No.65 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the P.O.C.S.O. Act for an alleged offence at Jaswant Nagar police station, Etawah. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. indicated her …
The applicant, Shivam @ Shubham, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29891 of 2026 concerning Crime No.207 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 3/4(3) of the POCSO Act. The State argued against bail, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who was arrested on 4 June 2026 in connection with a case (Crime No.186 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
Vishal Gupta applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 375 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(2) and 316(2) of the B.N.S. The court examined the material on record, hearing counsel for both the applicant and the State. It noted that the victim is a major aged about 24 …
Roshan Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.202 of 2026) alleging false promise of marriage, charged under IPC sections 64(2)(m), 351(3), 352 and Sections 5(l)/6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had established a relationship with the victim by promising …
Ravishankar Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.133 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 123, 64(ड), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Evidence Act. The victim is a 19‑year‑old adult and the prosecution lacks clinching evidence that the accused misled the victim. …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Raghav, was arrested on 21‑02‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 170 of 2026) involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, asserting his innocence and noting that the victim, who had initially testified, turned hostile …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Smt Bala, a 76‑year‑old woman, who was alleged to be involved in offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The FIR was lodged thirty‑one years after the alleged incident and after a belated …
The applicant Javid filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 326 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already …
The applicant, Dharmi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 109, 117(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). He claimed that co‑accused Rohit Bhati and Jeetu @ Jitendra had already been granted anticipatory bail by another …
The applicant, Rihan, was arrested in Crime No.156 of 2025 under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act and has been in custody since 26 March 2025. He filed a second bail application after the first was rejected, but offered no new grounds for release other than the length of …
The applicant, Irshad, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal record. He had been in custody since 14 …
The applicant, Ujaifa, sought bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, filed at Police Station Sardhana, Meerut. The court noted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and was only identified later by the informant in a statement recorded four …
Rahul Sharma was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 364 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 109(1) and 351(3), the B.N.S. provision 3(5) and the Arms Act sections 3, 25 and 27. The applicant contended that the injury to the victim was limited to the right hand, not …
Ashwani Jadaun was arrested in connection with alleged forgery of a vehicle chassis and related offences under several IPC sections and the Income Tax Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no authority to issue invoices and that the allegations were false. The State opposed bail, but the court …
Vishal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 61(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party who voluntarily married …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No. 227 of 2026. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated due to police …
The applicant, Intzar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 374 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he …
The applicant, Farman, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 416 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 9 of the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025. The High Court considered the facts, the lack of …
Ankit Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.102 of 2026) filed under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were the result of police rivalry, that he was not a gang member, and that he had already …
Shivam Pal @ Jwala Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No.53 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police firing incident in which he sustained a gunshot injury. The applicant argued that he was a victim of cross‑fire and that …
The applicant, Sahil Shilpkaar, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 352 of 2026) under Sections 3(5) BNS and Sections 3, 5A, 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that the sole basis of his implication was a …
The applicant, Pradeep, was arrested in connection with Crime No.293 of 2024, charged under IPC sections 302, 120‑B, 504, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25 and 27. He has been in custody since 19 June 2024 and filed a second bail application after an earlier one was rejected. The counsel for the …
Manish Yadav was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act in Crime No.126 of 2025. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, …
The applicant Rajjab was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3 and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, alleged to have occurred at Pahadi police station, Chitrakoot. He sought bail, claiming innocence, that the FIR was filed a day after the alleged offence, lacked any mention of …
Ramdayal Rai was arrested in a case registered under Sections 498‑A, 377, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the FIR was false, filed after an application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC, and that there was no medical evidence to support the …
Rajesh Harijan was arrested in a case (Crime No.269 of 2025) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleged to be a gang member. He filed a bail application asserting that the charge was a result of police rivalry, that he had already been granted …
Kayamuddin alias Raju applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.149 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 109(1), 317(2), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act (Section 3/25) and the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (Section 3/8). The incident arose from a police firing in …
The applicant, Vaseebu @ Vaseem, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 142 of 2026) under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that the alleged contraband was recovered from another accused who had already been granted bail. The prosecution …
Himanshu Thakur applied for bail in a case (Crime No.172 of 2026) involving eleven FIRs under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The court noted that a co‑accused, Manisha Chauhan, had already …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Harbir in criminal case No.130 of 2026 under Sections 8, 15 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, alleging that two separate recoveries of …
Shivshankar Bind applied for bail in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in a related gang chart case. He asserted that he …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar Saroj, who had been in custody since 14 July 2026 in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. No counsel appeared for the applicant; the judge examined …
Mantosh Yadav applied for bail in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges stem from police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had already been granted bail in two other criminal matters, as …
The applicant, Moosa, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on a single criminal incident already resulting in his earlier bail and that he was falsely implicated …
Raju applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No.110 of 2026) charged under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act. The High Court considered the facts, the lack of prior criminal record, and noted that a similarly situated co‑accused, Vivek, had already been granted bail. Counsel for both sides were …
The applicant, Sameer, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 502 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and is not a gang member. He had already been …
The applicant Raju applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 549 of 2026) where 421.46 grams of charas was allegedly recovered. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false recovery and that the quantity was below commercial threshold, and argued that mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and …
The applicant, Rovin, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 376 of 2026 for alleged possession of 130 grams of alprazolam powder and charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Information Technology Act, and the NDPS Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicant, Rambhan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 280 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed 39 days after the incident, he was not named in the FIR, and the only accusation against him came …
The applicant, Rishabh, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 39 of 2026) alleging misuse of a stolen SIM card. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was filed four days after the alleged offence, and that the informant’s complaint was delayed by seven days, providing no direct …
Shadab @ Abdul Majid, accused under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 505 of 2026, applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The applicant’s counsel argued that a co‑accused, Jarrar, had already been granted bail in a similar case, invoking the principle of parity. The State …
The applicant, Noorhasan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0035 of 2026) alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was delayed, he was not named in it, and the only evidence against him was a CDR report showing conversations with co-accused Dan Singh, which he said did not prove …
The applicant, Azad, applied for bail in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 31657 of 2026 concerning Crime No. 152 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had no prior criminal record and a co‑accused, Ajab …
The applicant, Irfan @ Luccha, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in connection with Crime No. 266 of 2026 arising from a police case in Dhampur, Bijnor. He contended that the charge was based on a single incident shown …
The applicant, Tahqeek, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal history. He has been in custody since 17 August 2026 and …
Rojid Ansari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 588 of 2025) filed under several provisions of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were false, stemming from police rivalry, and that he had already been granted bail in related …
The applicant, Nemchand, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 540 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The court considered his criminal history, which was explained, and noted …
Vivek, also known as Pinku, applied for bail in a case (Crime No.210 of 2026) filed under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charge was based on a single entry in a gang chart for which he had already been granted bail in …
The applicants, Sandeep Kumar (alias Sonu) and two others, were arrested under Sections 3, 5A, 8 and 5B of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. They contended that they were falsely implicated, asserting that no …
The applicant, Akhilesh Vishwakarma, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 423 of 2025) is pending. He contended that the charges were based on two prior cases listed in a gang …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ashish Sharma, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No. 296 of 2026. The applicant argued that the case was based on a single entry in a …
Prince Sharma applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 375 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been released on …
Ravi @ Gatte applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 296 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been granted bail, …
Kanti Devi was arrested in Crime No.108 of 2026 under Section 103(1) B.N.S. and applied for bail, arguing that the statement recorded by the investigating officer under Section 180 B.N.S.S. was not a dying declaration and that procedural lapses (no medical certificate, non‑compliance with High Court …
The applicant, Khursheed Ahmad, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had already been granted bail in a related gang chart case. …
Nasir applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 364 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail in two related …
The applicant, Mustkeem, filed a bail application in a case (Crime No. 229 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and is not a gang member. He had already been …
The applicant, Rihan, was charged under Sections 9(1)(a)(i), 5 and 25 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 505 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Jarrar, had already been released on bail in a similar case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.31132 …
The applicant, Jaggi @ Ajay Vanskar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 104 of 2025) under Section 103(1) of the IPC and Section 238 of the CrPC. The court noted that co‑accused persons Vipin Verma and Ajay had already been released on bail by a coordinate bench of the same court in a …
The applicant, Sallu Urf Salman, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 313 of 2026) under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication by the police and pointed out that the co-accused supplier had already …
Ranveer applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.138 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Mufeed, had already been granted bail in a similar …
Neelam Tiwari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.146 of 2026) under Section 103(1) IPC for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of the informant's brother on 19 July 2026. The prosecution alleged that Tiwari, along with two others, inflicted fatal injuries, while the defence argued …
Himanshu Thakur applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 149 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences, including sections 191, 190, 109, 115, 351, 352, 324 and 61, read with Section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932. The police had linked him to eleven cases, but the applicant explained his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Dubey, who was arrested under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 13.676 kg of ganja. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the quantity was below commercial …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ajeet Singh in Crime No. 438 of 2026, alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR and that the evidence against him was false, including a CCTV clip …
Mahendra Yadav was arrested in Crime No. 367 of 2026 under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 8 kg of ganja. The prosecution alleged that the contraband was recovered from his conscious possession. The applicant contended that he …
Anuj applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) filed under Sections 140(1), 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident and was based solely on speculation, with no eyewitness testimony or last‑seen evidence …
The applicant, Shri Aatif, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 225 of 2026) involving alleged participation in an unlawful assembly under Sections 352, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1) and 190 of the B.N.S.S. The counsel argued that Aatif was not named in the FIR and that the informant’s later …
Anuj Yadav was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act for offences alleged to have occurred in Surajpur, Gautam Buddh Nagar. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The court examined the facts, the criminal history of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted an eight‑day delay in filing the FIR and the absence of any …
The applicant, Ajmeri, was charged in Crime No.80 of 2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court noted that a co‑accused, Hafiz, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and, …
The applicant, Gulsher @ Gullu, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no criminal history. He had been in custody since 15 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pooran Singh, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 102 of 2026 under Sections 103(1), 115(2) and 352 BNS for allegedly assaulting a deceased person with a sharp‑edged weapon. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was …
Kapil Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 073 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on four other cases in a gang chart, that he had already been granted bail in those …
The applicant, Jamku @ Jamlesh @ Vimlesh, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.56 of 2026) under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. while the trial was pending. The court noted that a co-accused, Parwati Alias Sadawati, had already been released on bail in a similar case by a coordinate bench of …
The applicant, Manmohan, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31684 of 2026 concerning case Crime No. 500 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 70(2), 137(2), 127(4), 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 5G and 6 of the P.O.C.S.O. Act, 2012. The first …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 333, 351(3), 74, 75(2) of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delay of more than a month in …
The applicant, Rinku @ Abhay Kumar, was charged under Sections 137(2) of the CrPC, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act in Crime No. 275 of 2025. He filed a second bail application after the first was rejected. The counsel for the applicant failed to present any new ground …
Farman applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 232 of 2026) charged under Sections 137(2), 98, 75 of the B.N.S. and Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Tronica City, Ghaziabad. The State argued for continued custody, but the applicant’s counsel highlighted that no …
The applicant, Raj Bahadur, a laborer, was arrested on 4 August 2026 in connection with a case (Crime No.215 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trademark Act, 1999 and the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He pleaded innocence, claiming false …
Vikas applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 581 of 2026) under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court examined the material on record and noted that the applicant's name appeared only in the statement of a co‑accused, which the court held has no evidentiary value. No material was …
Sunil Kumar, a laborer, was arrested on 4 August 2026 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trademark Act, 1999 and the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He applied for bail, claiming he is innocent, has no criminal record and was falsely implicated. The State opposed the …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard a bail application filed by Vikas, the accused in Crime No. 177 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 109(1), 317(5), 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Arms Act. The applicant was represented by counsel Rajesh …
Viresh Rathor applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.91 of 2024) involving charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. This was his second bail application after the first was rejected on 27.08.2025. The trial court had already recorded …
The applicant, Arpit Roshan, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31703 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No.250 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 238(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned …
The applicant, identified as the son of the deceased, was charged with assaulting his father with an iron rod on 17 May 2026, resulting in death. The FIR was lodged on 18 May 2026, about a day after the inquest and post‑mortem examinations, during which the informant acted as a panch witness. The …
The applicant, Shakir, was arrested on 12 August 2026 for alleged possession of 255 grams of smack under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, alleging that the quantity was inflated to bring the case …
The applicant, Padmdhar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 2(B)(i) and 2(B)(ii) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and has been in custody since 11 May 2025. He filed a bail application asserting that the charges stem from a single …
The applicant, Mohd. Danish, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 312 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 21b of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, alleging that only 11.35 grams of heroin—below the commercial quantity—was seized. The applicant argued that the mandatory …
The applicant, Akhilesh @ Bauwa, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and is not a gang member. He had already been granted bail in a related case and had six …
Ankit Kanaujiya was charged in Crime No.69 of 2026 under Sections 191(2), 103(1) and 190 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunil Kanaujiya, had already been released on bail in a related matter (Criminal Misc. Bail …
Abhishek Verma applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.124 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that he had no prior criminal record and that a co‑accused, Hitesh Nigam Vayask, had already been …
Laxminarayan applied for bail in a non‑bailable offence (Case Crime No.101 of 2026) under Section 103(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined the facts, noting that a co‑accused, Shakuntala Mishra, had already been granted bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior …
Arjun Tyagi applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (Crime No.202 of 2026). He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case already listed in a gang chart, that he had previously been …
Shaham was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 9(51) of the Wildlife Protection Act in Crime No. 95 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Abdul Gaffar, had …
Ganesh applied for bail in Crime No. 419 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the case was filed due to police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he had already been granted bail in related …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only …
Rahul Kumar Yadav was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act, 1960. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial, contending that he was not arrested at the spot and that his name …
The applicant, Danish, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been granted …
Rahat applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.274 of 2025) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been granted bail, and …
The applicant, Keshav, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0019 of 2025) after his earlier bail plea was denied. He claimed that two new witnesses examined after the first order did not support the prosecution, asserting readiness to cooperate with trial and not misuse …
Kaushik Mazumdar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0362 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 61(2) and 318(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. The application was heard …
The applicant, Golu Kumar (also known as Shivshankar Kumar), applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.30 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Section 66‑D of the …
The applicant, Om Prakash, filed a bail application in a case registered under Section 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and lack of prior criminal history. He had been in custody since 19 May 2026 and claimed that …
Pinku Kumar was arrested in connection with Crime No.30 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail during …
The applicant, Imran, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had already been granted bail in a related gang chart case. He had been …
The applicant Rahul was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 345 of 2025) involving the deaths of two individuals, Raja and Subham. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a vague allegation that Rahul might have been involved, with no statements from the deceased, no direct evidence, and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Anurak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 237 of 2026 under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of the CrPC and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming he was falsely implicated in a …
Abdul Salam applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 274 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kush Patel, who was charged under several provisions of the B.N.S., the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that the co‑accused's statement implicating him lacked …
The applicant, Mohd Nawab, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (318(4), 338, 336(3), 341(2), 317(2)), the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 230 of 2026. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The …
Deepak Sharma applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the IT Act. The court noted that an accused’s prior criminal record cannot, by itself, justify continued detention if bail criteria are otherwise satisfied. The applicant’s criminal history was …
The applicant, Veerpal, sought bail in a case registered under Section 325 of the B.N.S., Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act and Section 3/8 of the U.P. Cow Slaughter Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated based on information from a squealer, which the court held …
The High Court considered the bail application of Aditya Anand, who was arrested on 19 April 2026 in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant argued that co‑accused Pawan and Chhotu, who faced identical charges, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aditya Anand, who was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing lack …
The High Court considered the bail application of Aditya Anand, who was arrested in Crime No.158 of 2026 on numerous charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He had been in custody since 19 April 2026. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Jay Prakash, who faced …
The applicant, Mohd Aslam, applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunne @ Iliyas Khan, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior criminal record. Relying on the principle of …
The applicant, Fardeen, was arrested in a narcotics case (Crime No.163 of 2026) for allegedly possessing 75 grams of smack, which is below the commercial quantity under the NDPS Act. He sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing lack of prior criminal history, non‑compliance with the …
The applicant Rafi applied for bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 536 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the 107 grams of seized substance was below commercial quantity and that mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and 52-A were not complied with. The applicant’s counsel …
The applicant Sonu filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that the charges were fabricated due to police rivalry, that he had no criminal history, and that he had already been granted …
Komal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.133 of 2026) where she was not named in the FIR but was mentioned in a co-accused's confessional statement. The counsel argued that the confessional statement has no evidentiary value, the FIR was filed with a ten‑hour delay, and the only material …
The applicant, Sohanvir @ Pintu, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.100 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the IPC (Bailable Non-Compounded) and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and was actually injured in police cross‑fire, not responsible for any …
The applicant, Devideen Prajapati, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 179 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the prosecution was based on three earlier cases in …
Chhotu Kumar was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the U.P. Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, and applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the applicant's clean criminal record, and noted that a co‑accused, …
The applicant, Shahnwaz, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2026) involving alleged cyber fraud under Sections 318(4), 61, 317(2) of the IPC and Section 66(D) of the Income Tax Act. The prosecution alleged that Rs. 49,000 was transferred to the applicant's account. The applicant …
Divyansh Pandey applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.180 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 238, 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's name appeared in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, but the court held that such a statement has no …
Shakti Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5A, 8 and 5B of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no animal was actually slaughtered …
Shivam Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) under Sections 318(2) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The applicant had no prior criminal record. The learned counsel argued that a …
The applicant, Banti, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 606 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and Section 11(1)L of the Animal Cruelty Act. The High Court examined the facts, noting that the applicant's name does …
The applicant, Akbar Ali alias Chingari, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 106 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court noted that the quantity of contraband recovered from him was below the commercial threshold and that a …
The applicant, Amit, was charged in Crime No.207 of 2026 under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court examined the facts, the submissions of …
The applicant, Insaf, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (Crime No. 286 of 2023). He contended that the charges were fabricated due to police rivalry, that he had no gang affiliation, and that he …
Shivam Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 166 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1) and 238 BNS. He argued that the FIR was lodged fifty days after the alleged offence, there was no identification parade under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, and eyewitness statements were recorded …
Arun applied for bail in a case (Crime No.53 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and was actually a victim of police cross‑fire, sustaining a gunshot injury himself. The State …
Kaleem was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 414 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act at Kotwali Mandi police station, Saharanpur. He applied for bail, asserting that he is innocent, that the allegations are false, and that no recovery of the alleged …
Abu Bakar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 66 of 2026) where he was charged under IPC sections 109(1), 352, 351(2) and sections 9 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Abu Ovaida, had already been released on bail in a similar case by a coordinate bench, and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tiya Sharma in an NDPS case (Crime No. 297 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 8, 22, 29 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The applicant asserted complete innocence, stating that no contraband was …
The applicant, Saddam, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had no criminal history. He had been in custody since 15 …
Ritik Kumar Chohan applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 415 of 2026, charged under several IPC sections (318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 317(2) BNS) and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act, relating to transactions of Rs.13,000. The court noted that no FIR had been lodged against the applicant …
Vijay Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 372 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The High Court considered the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Manoj Kumar, had already been granted bail …
The applicant, Gulshan Chandra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 05 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed a day after the incident and that the injuries to the victim were simple. The …
Manvendra Singh, the driver of a D.C.M. vehicle from which urea was seized, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trade Marks Act and the Essential Commodities Act. He pleaded that he had no knowledge of the contraband and had no prior criminal record. The High Court …
The applicant, Arun @ Pavan Shivhare, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No. 351 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for …
Kanhaiya Lal Singh applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No.744 of 2025) alleging innocence and claiming no inventory under Section 52-A, while the main accused Vinod Kumar had already been released on bail. The State opposed, presenting a forensic report that 195 kg of ganja was recovered from a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Mahra, who was arrested under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged that the recovery was a sham, and argued that the mandatory provisions of …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Farhan, who had been in custody for about seven months for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that his right to liberty under Article 21 was being …
The applicant, Tanvir Khan, was detained since 1 January 2024 in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Crime No.31 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of …
The applicant, Ajay Suresh Bhai Patel, was detained since September 14, 2024 in connection with a case (Crime No.256 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail, contending that he had been in custody for about …
The applicant, Shahrukh Khan, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.135 of 2026) under Section 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(m)/6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the material on record, noting that both the informant and the victim had turned hostile during the trial and …
The applicant Yaseen was arrested along with co-accused for alleged possession of 12.75 quintals of poppy straw under the NDPS Act. He contended that the recovery memo and rent agreement linking him to the premises were forged, and that co-accused Amarpal Singh and Nazir @ Abdullah had already been …
Sayyad Mohammad Avid was arrested in connection with alleged forgery of documents to obtain two passports and was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12(1) of the Passports Act. Two FIRs were lodged for the same incident, leading the applicant to claim double …
Faizan was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged transfer of Rs.9 lakhs and charged under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He had been in custody since 10 April 2025, amounting to more than one …
Jameel Khan applied for bail in a case registered under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He highlighted that he had already been granted bail in five other related …
The applicants Nilesh Singh and Bhola Singh were arrested in connection with the recovery of 5.150 kg of ganja and alleged possession of arms under Section 109 of the B.N.S., Section 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. They had been in custody since 7 May 2026 and sought bail …
Gulab Yadav applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under sections 85, 89, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act, sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act and section 67 of the I.T. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged 1.5 months after the alleged incident, …
Monu Bharti applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 366 of 2025) under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, invoking sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1). He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and …
The applicant, Prakash Rajpoot, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No.154 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail …
Samrat applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.40 of 2026) alleging he fired pellets causing injuries to three persons. The prosecution alleged he was the primary accused under IPC sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 3(5) BNS and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27, while the defence argued his …
Prince Singh was arrested in connection with a case under Section 109(1) of the NDPS Act and the Arms Act for alleged possession of 3 kg of opium and 2.3675 quintals of poppy straw. The applicant contended that the recovery was false, the quantity was only marginally above commercial limits, and …
The applicant, Ramsamush, was charged under Sections 8, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in Criminal Case No. 131 of 2026, with two cases filed against him simultaneously. A co‑accused, Naveen Kumar Gautam, had earlier been released on bail by the same court …
The applicant, Shakir Nepali, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 0203 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He claimed innocence, alleging false recovery of 1.124 kg of charas and lack of a chemical analyst's report, as well as …
The applicant, Kallu alias Kalua, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 389 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police firing incident at Bhojipura, Bareilly. The counsel for the applicant and …
Javed was arrested in Mathura under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged possession of 358 grams of alprazolam recovered from the dashboard of a car in which he was travelling with two others. He contended that he was falsely implicated and has been in custody since 4 June …
The applicant, Pushpendra, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 134 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the NDPS Act, alleging false implication and inflated drug quantity. The applicant's counsel argued innocence, lack of prior serious criminal history, and willingness to cooperate, while …
The applicant, Mohd. Muzaffar, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and police rivalry. He had been in custody since 12 June 2026 and claimed he was not a gang member and had …
The applicant, Tazim @ Imran, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had been in custody since …
The applicant, Mohd Yaseen, was arrested in connection with a police party‑firing case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) alleged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no police personnel were injured, and that …
Furqan was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act in Crime No. 170 of 2026, Pilibhit. He applied for bail during the trial. The High Court examined the facts, the parties' submissions, and noted that a co‑accused, Omkar Mishra, had already been granted bail in a similar case. Relying on …
Akeel Khan applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 1216 of 2025) alleging false recovery of 154 grams of alprazolam powder and lack of compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no chemical analysis, and that the charges were fabricated to harass him. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Singh (applicant) in a criminal case (Crime No. 69 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleging that 65 kg of ganja recovered from three …
The applicant, Zoya Khan, sought bail in a POCSO case (Crime No. 241 of 2026) alleging false implication and a three‑month delay in filing the FIR. Counsel argued that the applicant is innocent, has no prior criminal record, and has been in custody since 5 July 2026. The State opposed bail but could …
The applicant, Sumit Sharma @ Bhola, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 459 of 2026) involving offences under Section 109(1) of the BNS and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed the bail, but the applicant's criminal antecedents were explained and deemed not a bar to bail. …
