Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
862 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The applicant, Satyam Yadav alias Rishu Yadav, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that he had been falsely implicated because of police rivalry, asserted that he is not a …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ajay Yadav, who was charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in a case registered at Kaptanganj Police Station, Azamgarh. The applicant argued that his criminal antecedents had been fully explained …
Manoj Kumar was charged under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No. 248 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court noted that a co‑accused, Amir Khan, had already been released on bail in a similar case (Criminal …
The applicant, Rajneesh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 87 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he had …
Sachin, the applicant, was charged under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in Crime No. 116 of 2026, Muzaffarnagar. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Rahul, had already been released on bail in a similar …
The applicant Noori sought bail in a NDPS case (sections 8, 20, 29) while the trial was pending. The court noted that an accused's prior criminal history cannot, by itself, justify continued detention if bail criteria are otherwise satisfied. The court observed that a co‑accused, Amir Khan, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Noori, who is charged under Sections 8, 21(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant’s criminal history was explained, and the court noted that antecedents alone cannot justify continued detention if …
Harun applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 473 of 2026) charged under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 3/11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Rihan, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and, without delving into the …
Arbaj applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 385 of 2026, which is filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for which he had …
Shaurya Pratap, accused in Crime No. 297 of 2026 under Section 109(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, applied for bail. The case involved a police firing in which the applicant himself sustained a gunshot injury. The learned counsel explained the applicant’s criminal …
Gopi applied for bail in criminal case No. 288 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 85, 352, 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, filed at Kotwali Dehat police station, Mirzapur. The applicant’s criminal history was explained and no injury to …
The applicant, Shankar, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial is pending. He contended that the case against him was based on a single criminal charge shown in a gang chart, for which he had …
The applicant, Mukhtar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 186 of 2026) under Sections 2(b)(17) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case already listed in a gang chart for which …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Upendar Shah, who was charged in Crime No. 305 of 2025 under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and a provision of the B.N.S. The applicant, …
Salim applied for bail in Crime No. 19 of 2026 under Sections 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he has already been granted bail in related …
Shiv Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) under Sections 2(B)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail in eight …
The applicant, Istakar @ Nakli, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No.153 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court considered his criminal history, which was explained, and noted that bail cannot be denied solely on antecedents. It observed that a co‑accused, Rashid, …
The applicant, Umesh Yadav, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 143 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case already resulting …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ashutosh Singh, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the charges were based on a single criminal case already listed in a gang chart and …
The applicant, Hazari Prasad Sonkar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) under Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act. The court considered the applicant’s criminal history, which was explained, and noted …
The applicant, Buddhu @ Faizan, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(17) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were fabricated due to police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in …
The applicant, Yusuf, sought bail in a case under Sections 64(2)(Ka) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 4, and 5J(ii) of the POCSO Act, alleging that a DNA report showed he was not the biological father of the victim's child. The State opposed bail, emphasizing that eight witnesses had already …
Yahiya Urf Yahya applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 465 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on two earlier cases in a gang chart for which he had already been released on …
The applicant, Ashraf, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 427 of 2023) under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosives Substance Act. The court noted that the applicant’s criminal history had been explained and that a co‑accused, Naushad, had already been released on bail in a similar case. Relying …
The applicant, Gaurav, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in six related cases, asserting he …
Akash was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 62 of 2026, alleged to have violated Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 of the POCSO Act and Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Sonkar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8, 20, 27A, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only reference to him was in a co‑accused’s confessional …
The applicant, Rajesh Sonkar, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 89 of 2025) alleging innocence and that his name appeared only in a co‑accused's confessional statement, which lacks evidentiary value. He argued that he was falsely implicated, that the police had lodged multiple cases against him …
Manisha Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.172 of 2026) involving numerous offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. She pleaded innocence, asserting that she had no specific role or overt act in …
The applicant, Shitla Prasad Tiwari, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were a result of police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He had already been granted bail in two …
Afsar Ahmad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 19 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Anil Yadav, had already been released on bail in a similar proceeding (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9125 of …
The applicant, Nikit Gurjar, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal record. He has been in custody since 30 …
The applicants, Sujauddin and another, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 3, 5, 12 and 25 of the Arms Act arising from an incident in Meerut. The first applicant had no prior criminal record, while the second's alleged history was explained by counsel. The court noted that bail cannot be …
Rohit Shetthi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 57 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated that the applicant had no role in …
Manish Kumar was arrested in Mathura for allegedly possessing 13.670 kg of ganja, alleged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seized quantity was below the commercial threshold, …
The applicants, Janki Painter and Ranjeet Singh, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act. They applied for bail during the pendency of the trial, having missed a court appearance on 25‑05‑2026 …
The applicant, Virendra Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0551 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, pending trial. The learned counsel highlighted that a co‑accused, Dashrath, had already been released on bail by a coordinate …
The applicants, Bhagirath and Braj Bhusan (also known as Bhushan), were charged in Crime No. 52 of 2026 under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the …
The applicant, Soban, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No. 364 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had no gang affiliation, and that he had …
The applicant, Mohammad Faizan, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry. He had already been granted bail in a related gang‑chart case …
The applicant, Bhagwan Das @ Arjun, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31516 of 2026, seeking release in case crime No.30 of 2026 involving offences under sections of the BNS Act, the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, and section 66D of the …
Manoj Kumar applied for bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 372 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 60 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the seized 6.781 kg of charas was not in his possession and that he was falsely implicated. The applicant's counsel argued his innocence, lack of criminal history, and …
The applicant, Bhupendra (also known as Rishi), filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 31 of 2026) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on two earlier cases listed in a gang chart, for …
The applicant, Bhupendra, was charged under Sections 419, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber‑related offences. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunil Kumar, had already been …
Ankit Kumar was charged in Crime No. 380 of 2026 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339) and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The applicant contended that there was no cogent evidence linking him to the alleged online gaming offence and …
The applicant, Atul Anand, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0013 of 2026) under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case already listed in a gang chart for which …
The applicant, Rajdeep, was charged in Crime No.138 of 2026 under Sections 308(2), 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, asserting no prior criminal record. The Court noted that a co‑accused, Suraj Kumar, had …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Nisbat Khan in a session case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 304‑B of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that three fact witnesses, whose statements were recorded under Section 319 Cr.P.C., had …
The applicant, Dilip Kumar Patel, was charged under Sections 318(2), 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3), 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, in Crime No. 362 of 2026. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The Court noted that a …
The applicant, Shahnawaz, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on five other criminal cases in which he had already been granted bail and that …
The applicant, Suhail, filed a bail application in a NDPS case (Crime No.190 of 2026) alleging that 1050 grams of charas was falsely recovered and that no chemical analyst report exists to confirm the substance. He contended that the allegations are fabricated to harass him and that he has been in …
The applicant, Danish, was charged in Crime No.541 of 2026 under Section 109(1) of the BNS, Sections 3, 5Ka and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Animals Cruelty Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The court examined the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag Tomar, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Crime No.167 of 2026) alleging aggravated sexual assault. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, highlighted a 25‑day delay in filing the FIR, and noted that both alleged victims …
Prince Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he was already on bail in a related gang‑chart case. He had been in …
Rishi Sharma was charged under Sections 317(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 254 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Durgesh Kumar, had already been released on bail in a …
The applicant, Pappu Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.166 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The court considered the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Basant Lal Yadav, had already been granted bail in a similar case. The applicant's …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 31475 of 2026 filed by Keshu Yadav, who was arrested in Crime No. 273 of 2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 25(8) of the Arms Act and Section 61(2) of the BNS. The applicant pleaded that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Baniya Urf Vinod in a POCSO case (Crime No. 193 of 2026) under sections 5m and 6. The FIR was lodged seven days after the alleged incident and there was no medical evidence, although the victim gave a statement against the applicant. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naseem, who was charged under Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in a confessional statement of a …
The applicant, Sohil Khan, sought bail in a criminal case involving charges under sections of the IPC, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. He claimed innocence, stating that no indecent photographs were recovered and that the allegations were false. The State opposed bail but could not refute the …
Shani Kumar @ Ravi was arrested in Basti district for possession of 10 kg of ganja, alleged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that the seized quantity was below the statutory …
The applicant, Prashant Tiwari, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial is pending. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had no gang affiliation, and that he had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpendra, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 158 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he had been falsely implicated due to …
The High Court considered the bail application of Rakesh Kumar, who was charged under sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and section 66D of the Income‑Tax Act. The court noted that a …
Ajay Jain applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 393 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 60(1) and 63 of the Excise Act. The applicant was not named in the original FIR; his name surfaced only after about two and a half …
Parmai Lal was arrested on charges of fondling his niece under Sections 5(m)(n) and 6 of the POCSO Act, with the FIR filed 19 hours after the alleged incident and no medical evidence to corroborate the claim. The applicant, who had no prior criminal record, had been in custody for about seven months …
Rinku was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the alleged victim was a consenting party and that her age had been …
Anas applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 74, 64(1), 123(2) of the BNS and Sections 7, 8, 3, 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the three victims, aged between 16 and 18, were consenting parties who accompanied him on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Srawan Kumar Singh in a case under IPC sections 65(2), 352, 351(3) and the POCSO Act for alleged sexual assault of an eight‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and that the informant had extorted Rs 1 lakh, asserting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 561 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing a 19‑day delay in filing the FIR, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramzan Ali, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the SC/ST Act (section 3(2)(V). The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was filed four days after the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 95 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3/4(ii) of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a minor aged 14-15, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tulsidas Rajbhar, who is charged under Sections 64(1), 352, 351(3) BNS and 5J(2)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a woman who later gave birth to a child. The applicant contested the paternity of the child and sought DNA testing, while the …
Buddhvilas was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 94 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the 19‑year‑old victim was a consenting party, and that her statement recorded …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib, accused in a rape case involving sections of the IPC, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Shoaib stood guard while the co‑accused committed the offence, but the victim’s statements were inconsistent and she …
The applicant, Nazir Ali @ Kuddus, sought bail in a criminal case under Section 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed eight hours after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim’s age appeared to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Samadhiya, who was in custody for offences under IPC sections 363, 323, 376, POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, and IT Act section 67. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the alleged victim, an 18‑year‑old, had consented to the …
The applicant, Brijmohan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0038 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the alleged promise to marry the victim was unfulfilled and that no photographs or videos …
Arjun Prajapati applied for bail in a case registered under IPC sections 64(1) and 351(2) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, alleging that the alleged victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, was a consenting party and the matter stemmed from a failed consensual relationship. The applicant asserted his innocence, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Amit in a criminal case (Crime No.110 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the IPC, the 2023 BNS provisions, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The State Law Officer informed the court that a notice to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohan Kol (alias Sandeep Kol) in a criminal case (Crime No. 136 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserting that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Azam, who was charged under Sections 333, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC, Section 183 of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted a four‑day delay in …
The applicant, Sonu Kumar Keshari, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 481 of 2025) under Sections 333, 64(1) and 351(3) of the IPC. He claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged eight months after the incident and that a civil dispute had been converted into a criminal case, …
The applicant Suhail sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 226 of 2020) involving charges under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that there was no medical evidence to support the rape allegation and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devi Singh, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant contended that the relationship …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Adarsh Nishad, who was charged under Sections 69, 64, 89 and 351(3) of the BNS in a case arising from an alleged consensual relationship that later turned into a criminal complaint. The victim was a 23‑year‑old woman and the …
Mahesh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 41 of 2026) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 352, 74, 64(1), 115(2) and 333. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged two and a half months after the incident and lacked medical evidence, and highlighted his clean …
The applicant, Zubair, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 47 of 2026) involving sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 69 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from an alleged failed consensual relationship that was later criminalised. The victim, a 21‑year‑old adult, alleged assault and related …
The applicant, Satendra, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 509 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS suggested consent, noting that she had accompanied …
The applicant, Gaurav, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 116 of 2025) involving allegations of gang rape under several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged incident was a consensual relationship and that the victim’s statement was misleading. The …
Ratan Singh, detained since 25 May 2024, faced charges under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case registered as Crime No. 0102 of 2024. After a prior bail application was rejected, he filed a second bail petition, arguing that he had been in …
Vishal Parihar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 25 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 5J(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted a 20‑day delay in lodging the FIR but observed that the victim’s statement indicated consent and that …
Kamlesh was charged in Crime No. 286 of 2026 for offences under Sections 333, 64(2)k, 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, alleged to have raped a married woman. The FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS suggested she had consented, claiming …
The applicant Suhail sought bail in a case involving alleged rape, dowry harassment, assault, and violations of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act. The prosecution alleged that Suhail, the brother‑in‑law of the victim, raped her on 22 March 2026 and participated in a violent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra, accused under Sections 127(2), 65(1) BNS and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a 14‑15‑year‑old victim. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, the victim appeared to be a consenting party, and the age …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aazad, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 85, 64(1), 351(2) and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and pointing to a delayed FIR and a medical report that noted …
Vishnu Gurjar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 36177 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant were Ayush Mishra and Prabha Shanker Mishra, while the State of U.P. was represented by Kartikey Singh and G.A. The court noted that the list had been revised …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and raping a 15‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statement and CCTV footage showing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pawan Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 64 and 87 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Kushi Nagar. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act suggested consent, as she …
Munawwar Hasan Mansoori applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 154 of 2025) involving offences under Section 65(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(M) and 6 of the POCSO Act, with two child victims, one of whom sustained injuries. The applicant’s counsel failed to appear on multiple listed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi @ Lukka in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 70(2), 127(2), 137(2), 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, pointing to discrepancies in the collection and sealing of the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Priyanshu Jaisawal in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41200 of 2025. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that key prosecution witnesses had turned hostile after …
Musharraf was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 218 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 64(2), 352, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a 17‑hour delay in filing the FIR …
Majibullah applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.131 of 2025) alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religion Conversion Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed five days after the …
Suraj Prasad was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that the alleged victim, a 15‑year‑old girl, was a consenting party, that there was no medical evidence to …
Mohammad Aarshad was charged under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly establishing a relationship with a 20‑year‑old woman by a false promise of marriage and later refusing to marry. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The prosecution contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Samir Khan in a case under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed by 13 days, the victim was a consenting party, and there was no evidence of indecent material or blackmail. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarik alias Shariq, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual activity with a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, …
The applicant, Hashim, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 78, 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. The counsel highlighted a two‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and argued that the alleged …
Makkhan, a married man, was arrested in a case alleging that he eloped with a 17‑year‑old girl who claimed to love him. The FIR, filed four days after the alleged disappearance, accused him of offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The …
The applicant Sardar was charged under Sections 333, 87, 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged offences arising from an incident at Banpur, Lalitpur. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, testified that she had travelled with the applicant voluntarily and gave no indication of …
The applicant, Shishu Kumar, was arrested in a case (Crime No.267 of 2025) alleging that he had established a physical relationship with a 30‑year‑old woman by falsely promising marriage and later reneged, invoking Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
Rohan @ Ritik was charged under Sections 123, 75, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C), 67 of the Income Tax Act for allegedly spiking a victim's water, raping her, recording the act on video and posting it on social media. The applicant sought bail, arguing the FIR was delayed, the victim was a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit @ Manish @ Mohit in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) involving serious offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighting discrepancies in the collection and sealing of the victim’s …
Arjun Pal was charged under Sections 64, 333, 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a 14‑year‑old girl, the informant's daughter, on 17 March 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the victim had consented as per her statement …
The applicant, Moharram @ Mohammad Husain, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 744 of 2017) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(i), 376(D), 372, 373 and sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. He argued that he was never charge‑sheeted, that the victim had consented, he had no prior …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Utkarsh Jaiswal, who is charged under IPC sections 105, 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 87 and 61(2) BNS for an alleged offence at a victim's residence. The applicant argued that the mere presence in the room does not prove guilt, highlighted that …
The applicant, Tariq Ansari, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.248 of 2024) involving charges under IPC Section 333, Section 65(2) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5M and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement contained material contradictions, that the alleged …
Gulam applied for bail in a 2024 case under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. after a prior bail application was rejected for failure to explain his criminal antecedents. The State highlighted two earlier cases (Crime No. 591 of 2014 and Crime No. 307 of 2016) involving serious IPC offences …
The applicant, Deepak, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 292 of 2024) involving alleged dowry demand and homicide under Sections 80(2), 85, 115(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution argued that the FIR was filed within six hours and that the …
The applicant, Avadhesh, sought bail in a case under Section 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that he had raped a 15‑year‑old girl on 11 February 2025. The prosecution argued that the FIR was filed promptly, the victim’s statement was reliable, and medical evidence …
Smt. Sabiya filed a bail cancellation application on 23 April 2025 seeking to set aside the bail granted on 26 November 2024 to the accused in Crime No. 228 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 137(2), 64(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant failed to appear …
The applicant, Vijay Baghel, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 13242 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. He sought bail pending the trial of the charges against him. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvind Paswan @ Dhahi in a criminal case (Crime No.55 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the victim, a …
Kishan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 164 of 2025) alleging that he posted indecent photographs of a victim on Instagram, invoking Sections 69, 84, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar Bharti, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 225 of 2024) alleging theft, rape and offences under the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and asserted that the alleged victim, a girl born on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind Kushwaha, who was arrested on 14 March 2025 in connection with a case (Crime No.141 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 76, 65(2), 137(2) of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …
The applicant, Gurpreet Singh, sought bail in a case registered under Section 65(2) of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the charges of sexual assault on a five‑year‑old victim were false and stemmed from a family land dispute. The State opposed bail, emphasizing that the …
Vinay Singh applied for bail in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(3) BNS and 66‑E of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged three years after the alleged incident, there was no recovery of any indecent …
The applicant, Kashif @ Kasim, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been acquitted of the charges. The court noted that the bail application had become moot in …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Anuj Tomar, who is charged under IPC sections 69, 125, 308(8), 352, 351(2) and IT Act section 67 for allegedly deceiving a woman with a false promise of marriage, recording indecent acts and posting them on social media. The prosecution …
The applicant, Gaurav, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on his behalf, while the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The trial court had already recorded an acquittal of the applicant on 22 April 2026. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Kumar Dixit, who was arrested in connection with a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was a teacher of the alleged victim and presented a certificate from the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjeev, who is charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged rape and criminal intimidation arising from FIR No.251 of 2023. The applicant contended that the original FIR pertained only to outraging modesty and that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Sagar, accused in Crime No. 169 of 2025 under Sections 70(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act. Sagar argued that a co‑accused, Pankaj, who was similarly situated, had already been released on bail, …
The applicant, Deena, filed a second bail application in a case registered as Crime No.81 of 2022 under Section 376DA of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He had been in custody since 19 March 2022, amounting to more than four years, and argued that the prolonged detention violated his …
The applicant, Rohit Soni, filed a second bail application in a case under IPC sections 333, 64(1) and 351(2) alleging sexual assault. He argued that the victim’s cross‑examination revealed contradictions, there was no medical evidence, and the doctor’s testimony was inconclusive, constituting a new …
Alimaan Khan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 405 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 346 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim, who was 16 at the time of the alleged offence, had …
Mukim alias Mokim applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 121 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 74 and 64(2)(m) of the BNS and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted an eight‑hour delay in lodging the FIR, suggesting false implication, and observed that the victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dileep Singh, who is charged under Sections 69, 115(2), 131, 351(2), 352 and 304(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly deceiving a woman with a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the accused established a physical …
Vivek Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 248 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim was a consenting adult who had married him, and …
Lakshman Kumar was charged under sections 137(2), 87 and 64(2)(m) of the BNS Act and sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Chandauli. The FIR was lodged eleven days after the incident. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the BNSS suggested consent, and her …
Rohit Kumar Savita applied for bail in a case under Sections 64(2)(M), 331(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false accusations of rape by his niece. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed 21 days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, …
Aman Gaund was arrested in connection with Crime No. 25 of 2026, charged under multiple sections of the Criminal Procedure Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, arguing that a co‑accused, Nitesh Vishwarkarma, had already been released on bail and …
The High Court considered the bail application of Babloo Agrahari, who was charged under IPC sections 64, 123, 351(3) and 352 for allegedly raping a married woman after promising marriage and threatening her with a knife. The prosecution’s case relied on the victim’s testimony, but the FIR was filed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dayashankar, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) Act, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she had …
The applicant, Aman, was arrested in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 360 of 2025) and charged under Sections 87, 70(2), 127(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the victim’s initial statement under Section 180 did not …
Rohit applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 432 of 2025) under Sections 87, 351(3) and 64 of the B.N.S.S. The victim’s statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. indicated that she had consented to travel with the applicant, suggesting the alleged offence may be based on a consensual …
The applicant, Shubham Saini, filed a bail application in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) charged under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(G), 5(J)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act did not name the applicant as …
Anand @ Ikrar Khan was charged in a Bareilly case under several IPC sections including 333, 64, 352, 115(2), 351(2) and 308, with the alleged victim being a married woman. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated a personal motive related to a family dispute, and there was a …
The applicant, Lavkush, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 525 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS was found by the court to be inherently …
The applicant, Golu Rao @ Arjun Rao, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 0105 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. The victim, a 20‑year‑old woman, recorded a statement under Section 183 BNS indicating she does not wish to marry …
Ram Pravesh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 517 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6, 5N/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated that she had travelled with the applicant from …
The applicant, Satyabhan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 168 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS suggested consent, as she had accompanied the …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 215 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m of the BNS and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The State Law Officer informed the court that the informant had been served notice but did …
The applicant, Dipanker, was charged in Crime No. 145 of 2026 under Sections 87 and 64(1) of the BNS for an alleged incident at Chandpur police station, Bijnor. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, gave a statement under Section 183 BNSS suggesting she had consented to the encounter and claimed she …
The applicant, Ankit, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 38 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The court noted an inordinate delay of more than five months in lodging the FIR and observed that the alleged victim appeared to be a consenting …
The applicant, Mujaffar @ Muzaffar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 513 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) IPC, 65(1) BNS, 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act and 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The victim was a 16‑year‑old girl who, according to the statement recorded under Section …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nanhey @ Nanhe, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 70(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged after a delay of more than nine months, that the …
The applicant, Mohd Kaif, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 81 of 2026) filed under Sections 87 and 64(1) of the BNS. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS indicated that she consented to the relationship and denied any rape, stating she was a major of about 19 years …
Amit Gangwar was charged under sections of the BNS Act, the POCSO Act, and the IT Act for alleged sexual offences. After two earlier bail applications were denied, he filed a third bail petition claiming the parties had settled the matter and would marry. The State opposed, highlighting that the …
Ravi Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 64, 69 and 115(2) of the BNS. The FIR was lodged more than three months after the alleged incident, which the court noted as an inordinate delay. The victim, a married woman, was said to …
The applicant, Irshad, sought bail in a rape case (Crime No. 30 of 2026) filed under Sections 64(2)M and 351(3) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that Irshad, the brother‑in‑law of the victim, raped her and impregnated her, leading to a terminated pregnancy. The defence argued that the FIR omitted …
The applicant, Mohd Amir, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS suggested consent, as she had accompanied …
The applicant Jatin, owner of a hotel in Meerut, was implicated in Crime No. 119 of 2026 under sections 137(2), 61(2), 65(1) of the BNS and sections 16, 17, 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly failing to take the victim’s identification while taking that of a co‑accused. The prosecution …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Satish Saini, accused under Sections 137(2) and 64 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The prosecution alleged the girl was a minor of about 16 years based on medical ossification reports, …
Amar Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the victim, an 18‑year‑old, had stated in a Section 183 …
The applicant, Mohammed Shuaib, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 186 of 2025) involving alleged sexual assault, filed under IPC sections 64(1), 62, 324(5) and 310(2). The applicant argued that the FIR contained generic allegations and that CCTV footage did not conclusively identify him, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Avinash Sharma, who was in custody for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged false promise of marriage, subsequent marriage elsewhere, and threats to the victim. The prosecution alleged …
The High Court considered the bail application of Gulfam alias Chhanga, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.476 of 2025) alleging kidnapping and rape under Sections 87 and 64 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code claimed …
Anil Kumar was charged with raping a mentally challenged girl on 30 September 2025. The prosecution alleged the assault, but there was no medical evidence and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicated she had consented. The applicant pleaded innocence, argued the FIR was filed …
Ravi Kesarwani applied for bail in a rape case (Criminal No. 406 of 2025) alleging that the FIR was filed 11 days after the alleged offence and lacked a specific date and time. The prosecution contended that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC were consistent with the FIR …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junaid @ Bittu in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the …
Karan Bharti was arrested in connection with a rape case involving a girl born on 02‑12‑2008, alleged to have been enticed under false pretences and assaulted, with charges under IPC sections 137(2), 64(2), 351(2), 123 BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The applicant, Mohd Nadeem, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 562 of 2025) involving charges under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, and other provisions. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act, claimed she was in love with the applicant and alleged that …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Preetam Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 652 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 64(2)M of the IPC and Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that Gupta, under the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, accused under Sections 65(1) and 62 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and Section 18 of the POCSO Act, for an alleged offence involving a minor victim. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed and that the victim’s …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pankaj, who is charged under Sections 498A, 304B, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. The prosecution argued that the FIR was lodged promptly, the death …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Vinod Gautam, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Crime No. 46 of 2025) alleging sexual offences against a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the alleged victim was a consenting adult …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 90 of 2026) involving alleged gang-rape of a minor under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, there was no medical evidence, and the charges were politically …
Vishal was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 321 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old, had allegedly traveled with Vishal, stayed with him, and married him, and her statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. …
Lalman Prasad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 333, 351(3) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, noting a two‑month delay in filing the FIR and that the allegation of circulating an indecent …
The Allahabad High Court heard a second bail application filed by Rahul Yadav, accused under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the same Act in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 291 of 2024). The applicant contended that he was innocent, had been incarcerated for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Navi, who was charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident, that the victim’s statement under …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arif in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a …
Ravi Kumar was charged under IPC sections 452, 376, 506, 507 and IT Act section 67 for allegedly posting an indecent video of the victim on Facebook. He filed three successive bail applications, each asserting innocence, delay in FIR filing, and cooperation with the trial. The State opposed bail, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Karan Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 65(1), 332 of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted a one‑day delay in filing the FIR, and noted the absence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junaid in a criminal case (Crime No. 348 of 2024) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 87, 70(2), 123 and POCSO Act sections 9(g) and 10. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed two months after the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jabir Ali, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC, Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The applicant contended that the alleged victim, a 14‑year‑8‑month‑old girl, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Malik, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, the 2023 provision, and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly abducting and raping the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that …
Amar Gupta was arrested for allegedly enticing away a 15‑year‑old girl and raping her, with charges under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution argued that the victim’s minority rendered any alleged consent ineffective and that the accused threatened her …
Haseen Khan was arrested in connection with a rape case under the IPC and the POCSO Act, alleged to have assaulted the informant after the informant objected to his advances toward the informant's daughter. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed with a twenty‑hour delay, no …
Mohit @ Golu applied for bail in a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed three days after the alleged incident, the alleged victim was a consenting adult, and the matter was a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shailendra Kumar Sahni, who was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 142, 70(2), 61(2), 123 of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Anurag Rai, who faced …
Manish Kumar was charged with raping a 17‑year‑old girl on 15 March 2026 and allegedly supplying poisonous tablets, offences punishable under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged more than two days after the alleged incident and no medical …
Harsh Srivastava applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.96 of 2026) under IPC Sections 69 and 351(2) BNS, alleged to have entered a false promise of marriage with the victim and later refused to fulfill it. The prosecution claimed deception, while the applicant’s counsel argued that the …
The applicant, Ram Sharan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.44 of 2024) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, alleging a delayed FIR and lack of criminal history. The High Court noted that the FIR was filed promptly, the victim died within the …
The applicant Premchandra, arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 70(2) of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, sought bail during the pendency of trial. He claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the victim‑witness had turned hostile and rescinded her earlier …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish (Pinku) in a case registered under Sections 87, 142 and 64 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident and that the victim’s statements were inconsistent and indicated …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rohit, accused in a case involving alleged dowry demand leading to the death of his wife, charged under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution evidence had been closed and the …
