Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
862 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800
Ajay was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences against a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged seven days after the alleged incident, that the victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gopal @ Ram Gopal in a criminal case (Crime No. 298 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3, 4, 5M O 5(J)(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15237 of 2026, arising from Crime No. 05 of 2026 under IPC sections 64(1) and 333. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted an eight‑day delay in filing the FIR, and pointed out that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun, who was charged under Sections 65(2) and 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(1)(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a 12‑year‑old girl on 26‑27 November 2025. The prosecution alleged that the accused forcibly took the …
Harendra Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 265 of 2025) under IPC sections 65(1) and 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 5(n) and 6. He claimed innocence, citing a five‑day delay in filing the FIR and lack of medical evidence, and argued that he had been in custody for ten months without being a …
The applicant, Khaleur, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 209 of 2025) charged under Sections 87, 137(2) and 70(1) BNS of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that a co‑accused, Ismail, had already been released on bail, and therefore, on the principle of parity and his clean criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajid, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 716 of 2025) involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, including alleged rape and human trafficking of a minor. The FIR, lodged 18 days after the alleged incident, alleged that the applicant, …
Rizwan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.53 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 6 March 2026. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Yameen, who faced identical charges, …
Manish Madhesiya applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.100 of 2026) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 64(1), 123 and 351(2). The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed three days after the incident without explanation, the 22‑year‑old victim appeared to be a …
Ram Bahadur Yadav, accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, had given a statement under Section 183 BNSS indicating consent and had married the accused. The court examined …
The applicant, Amit (also known as Bhura), was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 227 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 304, 64, 352, 351(3) and 351(4) of the IPC, with the FIR lodged more than a month after the alleged incident. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The applicant, Rambabu Vishwakarma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 09 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 BNS of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from an alleged false promise of marriage and a subsequent consensual relationship with a 23‑year‑old woman. The …
The applicant, Raj, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.83 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was delayed by a day, and the alleged victim was a …
Moni Upadhyay applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 392 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 137(2) and 64(1) BNS as well as sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the two female victims, who are sisters, voluntarily left …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivnandan alias Aditya Mishra alias Alok Pandit, who was in custody since 26 January 2026 for offences under Sections 123, 142, 61(2), 70(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, …
The applicant, Jeetu @ Jitesh, was arrested in a case under Sections 64, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66‑E, 67‑A of the Information Technology Act for allegedly possessing and circulating an indecent video of a victim. The applicant contended that no video had been recovered and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind @ Akash, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 123, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged more than …
The applicant, Gufran @ Rihan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 169 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 64(2)(J), 87 and 351(3) of the IPC and Section 183 of the CrPC. The counsel argued that the FIR was false, delayed by ten days, and lacked medical corroboration, while the …
Mahesh applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under Section 351(3) of the IPC, Section 70(1) of the BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant was not named in the FIR, and his name first appeared only in the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the …
Vikas was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 83 of 2026) alleging that he and co‑accused Shiva Singh lured two girls, the daughter and niece of an informant, on 10 March 2026. The prosecution alleges offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Rathaur, who was arrested in connection with a rape allegation under Sections 64(1), 123 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant, the brother‑in‑law of the victim, claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged more …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash @ Raj Dhuriya, a 19‑year‑old accused under sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the IPC and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 69, 352 and 351(3) for allegedly establishing a relationship on a false promise of marriage and later refusing to marry. The prosecution alleged deception, while the defence argued that the …
Sunil Kumar was arrested in Crime No.57 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, accused of establishing a relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage and later refusing to fulfil it. The prosecution alleged that the applicant …
Kartikey Rao applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.12 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 137(2), 65(1)M, 87 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, 2012. The FIR was lodged about one and a half months after the alleged incident. The victim, who had stayed voluntarily at …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunnu Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under several IPC sections, a provision of the B.N.S.S., and sections of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, an 18‑year‑old woman, had …
Laukush applied for bail in a case where he was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC, and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 14‑year‑old girl, stealing Rs 50,000 and ornaments, and being involved in a pregnancy that was later terminated. The prosecution argued …
The applicant, Sone Lal Patel, was charged in Crime No.58 of 2026 under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged offence investigated by the Sarai Inayat police station, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted a delay of about two and a half …
The applicant, Rocky, sought bail in a criminal case (Cr. No. 0068 of 2025) alleging that he recorded an indecent video of a married woman and threatened to circulate it. The prosecution presented the victim’s statement and a video recovered from the applicant’s mobile, asserting the allegations are …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farzand alias Faizan, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2) for alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑old girl. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged after …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Babu alias Mehmood, accused of raping a minor under Sections 64(1), 332(2), 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant's house on 22 April 2025 and raped the informant's …
Lalit applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, which was filed five days after the alleged incident, and that the victim, though recorded as a minor …
The applicant, Faizan, was charged under IPC sections 65(1) and 351(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping his 13‑year‑old domestic helper on 18 April 2025. The prosecution alleged repeated sexual assaults, while the defence argued that the FIR was filed more than a month …
Vishal Pasi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0234 of 2025) filed under Sections 351(2) and 76 of the BNS, originally concerning criminal intimidation and later escalated to a rape allegation under Section 183. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged 20 days …
Anil Kumar, accused under Sections 65(2) BNS and 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for raping a minor, applied for bail during trial. The prosecution alleged that the victim was taken to a secluded place, found naked and bloodied in a sugarcane field. The applicant contended he was falsely implicated, noting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abrar, a 19‑year‑old accused in a criminal case (Crime No.212 of 2025) involving alleged sexual offences under the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the relationship with the 16‑year‑old victim was consensual and that the …
The applicant, Santosh Kamal, sought bail in a rape case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 39639 of 2025) where he is alleged to be the biological father of a child born to the victim, as established by DNA testing. He argued that his co‑accused had already been granted bail and that he had no …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Nizam, who was charged under IPC Sections 137(1), 65(1), 351(2) and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The prosecution alleged that the victim was assaulted after being taken from a nursery, with the FIR lodged five days …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aziz in a case registered as Crime No. 227 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 64, 351(2) of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67 of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged eight …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Gautam, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, a 19‑year‑old adult as confirmed by an ossification test, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by 19‑year‑old Abhishek Pal, who was arrested on charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the CrPC, Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ms. Ifrah Islam, who is charged under Sections 124(1), 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for allegedly setting the deceased on fire. The applicant argued that the dying declaration against her is unreliable because the …
The applicant, Jai Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court noted that a notice to the informant was served on 06.03.2026, but the informant failed to appear. The primary issue before the court was whether bail should be …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15592 of 2025) filed by Saurabh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the State's learned A.G.A. was present. The trial court's status report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kumar, who was charged with gang‑rape, video‑recording of the act, and offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused and a co‑accused raped the victim, recorded the act …
The applicant, Pushpendra Dev, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The court directed the applicant to deposit a fine of Rs.5,000 as a condition for bail. Counsel for the applicant complied and deposited the fine on 30 April 2026. Upon receipt of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Verma (also known as Mohit Verma) in a criminal case (Crime No.210 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saddam Hussain, who was charged under Section 70(2) of the BNS Act, Sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged outraging of modesty that was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Taleem Ansari, who was charged under IPC sections 376, 363, 366, 506, the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the Uttar Pradesh Anti‑Conversion Act (section 3/5(1)). The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim was a …
Chandresh Yadav was arrested in a case registered as Crime No.06 of 2026 under Sections 123, 351(3), 64 and 78 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking indecent photographs of a female relative, blackmailing her and demanding money. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitish Kumar (alias Sitaram) in a criminal case (Crime No. 349 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the 18‑year‑old victim was a consenting party who had …
Sharik Aalam was arrested in a case under IPC sections 69, 351(2) and 351(3) BNS for allegedly establishing a relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage and then abandoning her. The prosecution alleged that the victim was misled and that the applicant had gone abroad. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish alias Vijay, accused of raping the minor daughter of his alleged sister-in-law under Sections 64(2)(F) of the BNS Act and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused took advantage of the informant’s hospitalization to …
Nitin Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.30 of 2026, alleged to involve offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a five‑day delay …
The applicant, Vinod Jat, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 643 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, who had recorded a statement under Section …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hani Verma (applicant) in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was filed two days after the alleged incident, that there was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shadab, accused in Crime No. 90 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 352 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 4 and 5 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the key witnesses had turned hostile …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jahid, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 127(2), 70(2) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual activity with a girl who was reportedly under 17. The applicant contended that the relationship …
Kundan Singh Patel @ Vishal applied for bail in a case arising from S.T. No.818 of 2024, where he is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. This is his second bail application; the first was rejected on 13‑Jan‑2026. The applicant offered no new ground for bail …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dataram @ Ravi, who was arrested on charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(j)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 16‑17‑year‑old girl, had given …
Anup Gupta was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleged to involve a minor who was 18 years old. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicated consent, and there was no medical evidence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nadeem, accused in a criminal case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged that the victim, a 17‑year‑old who was pregnant, had consented to the relationship and was willing to marry him, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Chintu @ Brajesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 87, 61(2), 137(2), 64(1) and POCSO Act sections 5(j)(2) and 6 for allegedly enticing the informant’s 17‑year‑old niece, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant argued that he was …
Furkan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 23 of 2026) under Sections 69, 87 and 351(3) of the BNS, alleging he had enticed the informant's daughter with a false promise of marriage and subsequently refused to marry her. The prosecution alleged a consensual relationship that turned criminal, but …
The applicant, Sachin @ Bhanu Pratap, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.130 of 2026) alleging that he had entered a consensual relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman under a false promise of marriage and later refused to marry her. The prosecution alleged deception, while the defence argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanveer, accused in a case under Sections 352, 351(2) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault and rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a 15‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, no recovery of alleged …
The accused, Usman, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 161 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed five days after the incident without any explanation and that there …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj Sahani, who was charged under Sections 69, 93, 352 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly promising marriage to a woman in exchange for the disposal of a newborn girl and then refusing to marry her. The prosecution alleged a …
The applicant, Deepak Shakyawar, was charged under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence involving a minor girl. The FIR was lodged 27 days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement indicated consent, noting that she had …
Sunil Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 69, 89 and 351(3) of the BNS, alleged to involve an honor‑killing scenario where the victim died after her parents intervened in a consensual relationship. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior …
Manmohan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 180 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 64, 127(2), 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The bail application was filed on 16 May 2025 but the applicant’s counsel failed to appear for subsequent hearings, including the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramnaresh, who is charged under Sections 363, 376AB, 307 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences against a six‑year‑old child. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of any witness examination, absence of …
Mukesh alias Bauwa, accused under IPC sections 376Ka and 376Kha and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for a rape offence, has been in judicial custody since March 2020. He filed a second bail application, claiming innocence, lack of medical corroboration of the alleged rape, and that his prolonged …
Mahendra applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 352, 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant failed to appear before the court on multiple dates after filing the bail application on 16 May 2025. The court observed that such non‑appearance …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Bheem, who is charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a girl whose age was determined to be 17 years by an ossification test. The victim’s statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Eklak, who is charged under sections 64(2)(m), 308(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences in Gorakhpur. The victim, born on 03‑07‑2007, was found pregnant and had undergone an abortion at the …
Firoz applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 203 of 2025) involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated. He argued that the FIR was filed five hours after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim’s statements were …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Dhanesh, who was charged in Crime No. 41 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the BNS indicated consent, but the victim’s age …
Shehzan Ui Haq applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 97 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, POCSO Act and IT Act. The bail application was filed on 13 June 2025 but neither the applicant’s counsel nor the informant’s counsel appeared on the scheduled date of 15 April 2026. The Court …
The applicant, Rinku alias Jaiprakash, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been acquitted of the charges. The court noted that since the applicant was no longer in custody, the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitu Raikwar and Viru Raikwar, accused in Crime No. 145 of 2025 under several IPC sections and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicants, who have been in custody since 29 March 2025 and have no prior criminal record, argued …
The applicant, Faheem, filed a bail application in Special Session Trial No.1309 of 2024 concerning offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC indicated consent, and the …
Arpit Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 87, 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicating she had travelled with the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Gurjar, who was charged under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 376 (rape), 328 (extortion) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, …
Pradeep Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 598 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, initially a complainant, turned hostile during trial and later stated that she was a consenting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola alias Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a Special Session Case under the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued innocence, citing a four‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and that the FIR only …
The applicant, Akash Chauhan, filed a bail application in a case involving offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the POCSO Act, claiming innocence and a lack of criminal history. He had been in custody for 16 months since December 2024. The trial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Kumar, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence that began as outraging modesty and was later escalated to rape. The victim’s statement recorded under …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sarwan Kevat, who was arrested on charges of theft (IPC s.363), rape (IPC s.376) and offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim, although recorded as 16 …
Naushad Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 533 of 2025) alleging that he had entered into a false promise of marriage with the victim and subsequently refused to marry her, invoking Sections 69, 115(2), 316(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution contended that the …
Surendra Kumar alias Sachin applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 48 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, recorded as about 17 years old, allegedly gave consent and did not raise an alarm during the …
The applicant, Haridev, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the facts, including a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and the victim's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul, who is accused under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 5(L) and 6 for offences alleged to have occurred in Gautam Budh Nagar. The victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, testified that she had married Rahul, lived with him for …
Mohd. Junaid, the brother‑in‑law of a married female victim, was arrested on 27 May 2025 in connection with a case (Crime No. 72 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Paramveer @ Lala, who was charged under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Khakhreru police station. The court noted an inordinate one‑day delay in lodging the FIR …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeta Devi (alias Rita Devi) in a criminal case (Crime No. 149 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, citing that a co‑accused, Sandeep Tyagi, had …
Veeru Yadav (alias Atul Yadav) applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0109 of 2025) where he is charged under Sections 74, 351(3), 65(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 5m and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging modesty and rape of a minor. The applicant contended that the rape allegation …
The applicant, Akhilesh Vishwakarma, sought bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she had voluntarily accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru …
Mohan alias Munna was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five months after the alleged incident and the charge‑sheet under Section …
The applicant, Shani Rajbhar, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 91 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 65(1), 69, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and Sections 5L and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court noted a delay of more than one month in lodging the FIR and that the victim’s …
Satish Kumar Alias Golu applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.119 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2), 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged 16-18, had travelled with the applicant to Pune and did not raise any alarm, …
The applicant Ravi was charged under sections 137(2), 87 and 64 of the BNS and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Etawah. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had accompanied the applicant to Rajasthan and did not raise any alarm, leading the trial court to record a statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj in Criminal Case No. 109 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim turned hostile during …
The High Court considered bail applications filed by Gausiya, Rasida Bano and Sahid Ansari (alias Sahjaad) in a case involving alleged offences under sections 87, 61(2), 127(2), 351(3) and 69 of the BNS. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated, argued that the victim’s statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vakeel alias Vikram Nishad in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 115(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, born on 01‑01‑2008, was said to have accompanied the accused to Mumbai …
The applicant, Krishnakant Alias Chunnu Barar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 177 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had reportedly given consent and later married the …
Mukesh Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 171 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 indicated consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru for three months …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Gulfam in a criminal case under Section 64(1) of the Bail and Security Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bail and Security Act suggested consent, and the victim was said to be about 18 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harsh, who was charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at T.P. Nagar, Meerut. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS were found to be …
The applicant, Chandbabu, was charged under IPC sections 65(2), 333, 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 5(n)/6 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old child and committing buccal coitus on 13 March 2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, there was no medical evidence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahibe Alam, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 87, 64(1), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The applicant claimed he was …
The applicant Vijay was charged in Crime No. 178 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Khekra police station, Baghpat. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act indicated that she had consented to …
Ankit Sonkar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 177 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 123(1) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged about 16 according to an ossification test, alleged that the applicant spiked her drink, …
The applicant, Bardani, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 44 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the facts, the seriousness of the alleged offences, and noted that the victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotu Chauhan, who is charged under Sections 376, 352, 342, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC for an alleged incident in Deoria. The victim, a married woman, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicating that she had consented and did not …
The applicant Rinku was charged under sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act, sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, and section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act for an alleged offence in Mirzapur. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 of the BNS Act suggested consent, as she travelled with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, the girl …
The applicant, Rashid Ali, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 204 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged between 15 and 16 years, had reportedly given consent and had accompanied the applicant to …
Arun was charged under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Meerut. The victim, aged about 18 as per an ossification test, gave a statement under section 183 BNSS indicating consent, having stayed with the accused for 20 days …
Lokendra applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 391 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged about 17, recorded a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicating consent to the proposed …
Rohit Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.55 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, that the alleged …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application (No. 29266 of 2025) filed by Vipin, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act in Crime No. 197 of 2025. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, the victim had consented as per her …
Amit Rajpoot was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012, alleged to involve a minor victim. The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting adult who later married him, and that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pranshu Urf Priyanshu, who is charged under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences committed in Gajraula, Amroha. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had recorded a statement under Section 183 …
Ravi Pratap Shukla applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2025) involving alleged assault and intoxication of a consenting adult woman at a hotel, with charges under Sections 64, 123 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a nine‑day delay in filing …
The applicant, Ajay Tiwari, was charged in Sessions Trial No.358 of 2025 for offences under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, arising from an alleged sexual act with a 16‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 BNSS indicated that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Sharma, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Riyaz Ansari, in an identical case had been granted bail, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Dhaikar, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim was a consenting adult who had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Rajbhar in a criminal case (Crime No. 227 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a …
Mannu @ Monu Harijan applied for bail in a case registered as Crime No.680 of 2024, involving charges under Sections 363, 506, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by four months, and asserted that the alleged …
Vimlesh Kumar, arrested in Crime No.216 of 2024 under IPC sections 70(2), 76, 351(3), 352 and POCSO Act sections 5G/6, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He has been in custody since 1 December 2024 and has no prior criminal record. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Suraj @ Ravi …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vijay Kumar Alias Bullet in a criminal case (Crime No. 276 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was …
The applicant, Neeraj Sharma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 253 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87, 351(3), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and argued that the alleged victim, a major …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Tiwari, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 87, 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim, a …
Saurabh Gupta was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged outraging of modesty that was later escalated to rape under Sections 75(1)(i), 333, 351(3), 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5m/6, 9m/10 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the FIR was filed three days after the incident, …
Salman Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 63 of 2025) involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act, and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the …
Tarun applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 285 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The victim, PW‑1, testified during trial that she was not sexually assaulted, that no indecent photographs were posted, and that she was not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sawan Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.60 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay alias Chhotu, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 291 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 87 of the IPC, Section 65(1) of the B.N.S.S., and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …
The applicant, Golu alias Gaurav Tamoli, filed a bail application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 64, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Priyom in Criminal Case No. 318 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 137(2) and 64(2)(1) and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated and that the victim’s statement under …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshur, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim had consented to the relationship, …
Javed Ali was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act suggested consent and she refused a medical examination, resulting in no forensic corroboration. The …
The applicant, Sahid Ansari alias Sahjaad, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking release from custody. The State of Uttar Pradesh opposed the bail. The court examined the application and referred to the order passed in the leading …
The applicant Rahul, charged under Sections 115(2), 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, has been in judicial custody since 21 October 2024. He filed a second bail application, arguing that his prolonged detention of over one and a half years violates his Article 21 …
The applicant, Majhale @ Veeresh, sought bail in a session case involving alleged rape, blackmail, and the circulation of a pornographic video under Sections 376‑D, 34, 506 IPC, Sections 5(G)/6 POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant seized the victim’s …
The applicant, Janu @ Ramakant Sharma, was charged with rape, criminal intimidation and offences under the POCSO and IT Acts, alleged to have possessed and helped viral a indecent video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, raped the victim and blackmailed …
The High Court considered the bail application of Suresur Kumar Yadav, who is charged with rape of a minor under Sections 70(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the offence occurred on 5 July 2025, but the FIR was filed three …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 682 of 2025) under IPC sections 69 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a false marital relationship with a 20‑year‑old victim and later reneging on the promise. The applicant’s counsel argued that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jayprakash, who is accused under IPC sections 69, 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) for allegedly entering into a false promise of marriage and subsequently refusing to fulfil it. The prosecution alleged that the applicant misled the victim, while the …
The applicant, Anoop Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 311 of 2025) under Sections 64, 123, 87 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she was a consenting party and had seen the applicant with her family before he fled the scene. The FIR was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by 18‑year‑old Aryan Verma, accused under IPC sections 115(2) and 351(2), section 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. Act and sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Nazir, who was in custody since 9‑December‑2024 for offences under Sections 65(1), 351(2), 74 BNS of the IPC and Sections 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the informant and victim, who were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Rai, who was charged under several IPC provisions and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged indecent photography of a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no indecent photograph was recovered, and …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit (also known as Nikhil), who was arrested under sections 65(1), 351(2), 352, 131 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 15‑year‑old girl. The defence argued that the …
A bail application was filed in the Allahabad High Court by Aasey @ Aaseyram (the applicant) against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Madan Singh, informed the court that the applicant had died. The court held that the death of the applicant rendered the …
Rohit Garg was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2)(i) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the alleged victim had given consent, as reflected in her statement recorded under Section 183 …
Gopal, a 20‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case (Crim. No. 316 of 2024) alleging offences under the IPC, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act, the alleged victim being a 14‑year‑old girl. Gopal contended that the relationship was consensual, citing the victim’s statement recorded under …
Jaypal was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The victim, who had initially testified, turned hostile during trial, undermining the prosecution's case. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserted no prior criminal record, and argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arshad alias Irshad, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 64, 351(2) and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a sexual relationship with a 21‑year‑old woman under a false promise of marriage and subsequently aborting …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Pramod Kumar Rajpoot, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 70(2) of the BNS Act, Sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act and several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil, who was arrested on 18 April 2025 in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 351(2), 64 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim was a consenting party …
The applicant, Babloo, was arrested for alleged assault and sexual assault under several IPC sections after an incident on 7 December 2024. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed a day late and that the victim’s allegations of rape were added later without medical corroboration. The …
The applicant, Tejveer alias Bhoola, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for alleged extortion and distribution of indecent photographs. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was …
The applicant, Vinay Kumar alias Ashish, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 461 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(2) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act, where a 10‑year‑old girl was the victim. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed on behalf of Tanveer Ahmad in a criminal case (Crime No. 177 of 2025) under Sections 64(2)(M), 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the alleged victim was a consenting party, and highlighted his clean record …
Shariq alias Kashif was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 244 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 123, 64, 351(2) and 61(2)(a) of the IPC for allegedly circulating an indecent video. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS expressly denied that the applicant made the video, …
The accused, Nafeus, applied for bail in a rape case (S.T. No.470 of 2025) arising from Case Crime No.454 of 2024. The applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a consenting party, that both the victim and the accused sustained injuries, and that the allegations amounted to false implication. …
The applicant, Rohit Prajapati, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 alleging that he had entered into a false promise of marriage and subsequently refused to fulfil it, leading to a claim of deception by a 26‑year‑old victim. The applicant contended that the allegations were …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravi Karan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 64(2)F, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the IPC, alleged to involve misuse of dowry laws. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, being the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajpal, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging the modesty of a 16‑year‑old girl, later escalated to rape. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saqib, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 64(1), 127(2) and sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged after a delay, and that …
Anurag Yadav, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging that he raped a 13‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, that the victim did not raise alarm, and that …
The applicant, Amit Rajbhar, was arrested on 12 October 2025 in connection with a charge of rape under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, arising from an alleged incident at a hotel in Varanasi. He pleaded innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a 26‑year‑old woman, had voluntarily …
Shivam, accused in Crime No.516 of 2026 for offences under the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S. Act and Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act, sought bail during the pendency of trial. He argued that a co‑accused, Ravi, with an identical role and no prior criminal record, had been granted bail, establishing …
The applicant, Rajesh alias Nirhu, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 142, 64(1) of the IPC, Section 70 of the Evidence Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication in a gang‑rape allegation. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the victim …
The applicant, Karan Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case involving alleged posting of indecent photographs and a video of a consenting victim on Instagram, charged under sections of the BNS, Income Tax Act and POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing the victim's statement of consent and …
The applicant, Shashikant Ahirwar, was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence in Jalaun. The victim, a girl of about 16 years, testified that she had consented to the relationship, having accompanied the applicant from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rizwan, who is charged under multiple provisions of the POCSO Act and the Uttar Pradesh Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. Rizwan has been in custody since September 1, 2024 and seeks bail on the ground of parity with a co‑accused, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Patel, who was accused of attempting to rape a woman on 15 March 2025, with allegations that he bit the victim's face. The prosecution relied on a medical report confirming the injury, while the defense argued that the FIR was lodged twelve …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj alias Boby in Criminal Case No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 64(1), 123, 87, 61(2), 351(2) and 352 of the BNS. The victim, a 22‑year‑old woman, claimed the accused spiked her drink during a trip to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bitanu @ Neeraj Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 69 of 2025 under Sections 65(1), 352, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh, who was arrested on 24‑04‑2025 in connection with a case (Crime No.06 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 64, 61, 87 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 9 and 10 of the …
Mukesh Sahni applied for bail in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS indicated consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to Gujarat and solemnised …
Vishal was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 280 of 2024) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 323, 506, 427 and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6. He applied for bail, claiming he is innocent, has no criminal record, and that the alleged victim is a consenting adult who lives …
The applicant, Sumit Alias Hau, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 193 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 65(1), 74, 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 7(2) of the POCSO Act. Counsel for the applicant argued that he was innocent, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged …
The applicant, Hashim, was arrested in a case under Sections 69, 115(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly entering into a corporeal relationship with a woman on a false promise of marriage and later refusing to marry her. The applicant contended that he was already married to the woman, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nikhil Prasad, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 115(2), 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Kaptanganj, Kushinagar. The victim, aged about 20, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNS …
The applicant, Maaj, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 212 of 2025) alleging that he entered into a corporeal relationship with a 30‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage, violating Sections 69, 89, 352 and 351(2) of the BNS. The applicant contended that the relationship was …
Suraj was arrested in a case registered as Crime No. 96 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences at an OYO hotel. The FIR was lodged 12 days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement suggested consent, while …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh, accused under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had given a consent statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay, who is accused under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delay of more than a year in filing the FIR, and pointed out his clean …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who was arrested in Crime No. 86 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the IPC, Section 65(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam in a case under IPC sections 64, 352, 351(2) BNS and IT Act section 67A for allegedly circulating an indecent video. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he never possessed or recorded the video and that the co‑accused Amarjeet was …
The applicant, Farman, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 73 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The victim, who is reported to be slightly below the age of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahima, who is accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 352, 351(4), 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant asserted that he is innocent and that the alleged victim, who gave a statement under Section 183 of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Mishra, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the alleged victim was a consenting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chahat in a criminal case (Crime No. 280 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 65(2) of the B.N.S.S and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, though a minor, gave consent as per her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Komal alias Hrishchandra, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 65(1) BNS and 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging modesty that was later escalated to rape. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing lack of medical …
