Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
862 judgments · newest first · showing 801–862
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishan Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim was not pregnant, had refused a …
The applicant, Sherajulddin, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 246 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 64(2), 115(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged five months after the alleged incident, and there …
The applicant, Balkishun Bharti, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) under IPC sections 65(2), 352, 351(2) and POCSO Act sections 5(M) and 6, alleging false implication in a sexual offence against a five‑year‑old victim. He claimed innocence, stating that no medical …
The applicant Kallu was arrested on 19 July 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged indecent video creation, charged under IPC sections 504, 506, 376(2)M, sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act and section 67 of the IT Act. He claimed the victim had consented to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence. The victim, aged 17‑18 as per an ossification test, claimed consent in a statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj Kumar (Ajay) in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 14‑year‑old according to the FIR, was actually a …
The applicant, Angad Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 75 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 351(2), 127(2) of the IPC, and Sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The prosecution presented a forensic science laboratory report indicating …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Sandeep Rajbhar, who had been in custody since 25 July 2025 in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 115(2), 123, 70(2), 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Bailable Non‑Bailable (BNS) provisions and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotu, who was arrested in connection with a POCSO case (Crime No. 228 of 2025) under Section 65(2) of the BNS and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged ten hours after the alleged …
Arbaz Shah was arrested in a case involving alleged sexual molestation under Sections 64, 351(3), 137(2), 87 of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the …
The applicant, Sachin Kumar Singh, sought bail for a series of offences including IPC sections on murder, kidnapping, and the IT Act, alleging that the FIR was filed after a long delay and that the allegations of fraud, blackmail and sexual exploitation were false. The prosecution contended that the …
The applicant, Mazid, sought bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, having been in custody since August 2020. This was his second bail application after a prior rejection. Counsel argued that the trial was progressing slowly, with only four witnesses …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Bata (alias Harsh Tomar) in a murder case (Crime No.191 of 2025) involving sections 191(2), 140(1), 103(1), 238, 3(5) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with others, conspired to murder the …
The applicant, Abhay Raikwar, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.16 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing that a co‑accused, Rahul Gupta, with an identical role and no prior record, had already …
The applicant, Nakul Yadav @ Aditya, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 556 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109(1), 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that a co‑accused, Monu Pal @ Rohit, with an identical role had already been released on bail, and …
The applicant, Shoyeb, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No.473 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name appeared only in the statement of a squealer, …
Chhote Lal Yadav applied for bail for a case (Crime No.681 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 80(2), 85, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. This was his second bail application after a prior rejection. The applicant argued that witness statements were contradictory, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Katheriya in Criminal Case No. 197 of 2025, which was registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated on the basis of a suspect statement by the …
The applicant, Guddu Urf Satya Prakash, filed a bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, claiming he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing a witness statement that the applicant was the last person seen with the …
Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 169 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and the B.N.S. He applied for bail, arguing that a co‑accused, Arun Prajapati, had been granted bail in a similar circumstance and …
The applicant, Ahmad Hasan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0244 of 2023) involving charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial is near its conclusion, with the accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rajjo, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, who is charged under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly setting the deceased on fire. The applicant argued that the prosecution …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Om Prakash, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 137 of 2025 under multiple IPC sections and the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that an informant had exonerated him and co‑accused, and highlighted a …
The applicant, Vijay Bansal, sought bail in a case under the NDPS Act where 526.60 kg of ganja was recovered from a truck he allegedly was traveling in. He argued that he was merely a cleaner, not the driver or transporter, and that the statements of the vehicle owner, driver, and transporter did …
The applicant, a police personnel, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 191(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting a deceased army man, causing grievous injuries. The prosecution’s version held the applicant as the principal assailant, while the informant later …
Himanshu Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case (No.330 of 2025) under Section 103(1) B.N.S. while the trial was pending. He had been in custody since 17 November 2025 and argued that a co‑accused, Anku @ Ankush Kumar, had been granted bail in a similar circumstance, establishing a claim of …
The applicants, Saniya Parveen @ Nisha and Kamar Jahan, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) and sought bail during the pendency of trial. The prosecution alleged that they participated in the assault and murder of Noor Mohammad, but the applicants claimed …
The applicant, Bablu, filed a second bail application in a trial concerning offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He argued that only one witness had been examined since the first bail plea was rejected and asserted his willingness to cooperate …
Mehi Lal Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 534 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged homicide was actually an accidental injury. He argued that he was not driving the car that struck the …
The applicant, Akash Saini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 229 of 2025) alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed more than a day after the alleged incident and that he was first mentioned only in a delayed statement by a relative of the informant. No other evidence …
The applicant, Sachchidanand Yadav, was arrested in a murder case alleging that he, along with co‑accused, brutally assaulted and killed the informant’s son with an axe on 29‑08‑2025. He filed a bail application, contending that the FIR was delayed by over five hours, the injuries did not match the …
The applicant, Sonu, filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9428 of 2026) in the High Court of Allahabad seeking release on bail in Crime No. 549 of 2025, which is registered under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. at Police Station Phase-2, Noida. The sole accused contended that …
The applicant, Jitendra alias Gunga, a deaf and mute person, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.254 of 2024) where he was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely on suspicion related to blood‑stained clothes. The applicant argued his innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and the …
The applicant, Jahid Urf Jahanain, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 364, 302, 201, 394 and 411 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, argued that his four‑year pre‑trial detention violated his Article 21 rights, and asserted that he …
The applicant, accused under Section 302 IPC for allegedly throttling his son to death, filed a second bail application after being in custody for over four and a half years. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by fifteen hours, and contended that the informant’s testimony did not …
Awadhesh Ahirwar was arrested in connection with Crime No. 89 of 2024, charged under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 302/34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He had been in custody since 17 May 2024, amounting to about one year and ten months, and claimed he was falsely implicated. The …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife. He claimed innocence, arguing that the death was accidental, the FIR was delayed by nine hours, and that the trial had progressed slowly …
The applicant, Chandani, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 40152 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been acquitted, making the bail application unnecessary. The State of U.P., as …
The applicant Akshay was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's brother on 14 March 2025, alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the BNS. The prosecution's case relied on the FIR stating that the accused and co‑accused moved the dead body to their house, but offered no direct …
Ravindra Singh alias Chunnu, accused of offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 506, 302 and 34 of the IPC, applied for bail while the trial was nearing its conclusion, having been in custody since 28 May 2024. His earlier bail application was rejected and a Special Leave Petition …
Altaf Ali applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 181 of 2025) alleging his involvement in a death where aluminium phosphide was found in the victim's viscera. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged two days after the incident, he has no prior criminal record, and the …
The applicant, Puspendra @ Pawan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed twelve days after the incident, no post‑mortem was conducted, and the only evidence linking him was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishant Joshi and Abhishek Singh, who were arrested under Section 2(b)(i)/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered at Police Station Marka, Banda. The applicants contended that the …
The High Court considered an application to cancel the bail granted on 18‑Feb‑2025 to Jai Singh Yadav in Crime No.555 of 2024, which involved offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant, Saurabh Jaisawal, alleged that the accused misused his liberty by sending indecent and threatening …
The applicant, Vivek Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The trial court had already acquitted the applicant on 8 October 2024, as reflected in the …
The applicant, Dilshad, sought bail in a case (Crime No. 278 of 2024) alleging his involvement in a fatal stabbing under IPC Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 103(1). The prosecution alleged that co‑accused first stabbed the deceased and that Dilshad, along with another accused, assaulted the victim …
The applicant, charged under Section 302 IPC and Section 4 of the Arms Act for the murder of his wife, sought bail, claiming innocence and alleging a delayed FIR and violation of his Article 21 rights after three years of incarceration. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem indicated a death …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Sharma in a criminal case (No. 99 of 2025) under IPC sections 103(1), 238 and 140(1). Sharma claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that he was not named in the FIR and that his name appeared only in statements of three witnesses …
The applicant, Chavindra Alias Machchhar, was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's son under Section 103(1) BNS of the IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged enmity and presented CCTV footage showing the applicant near the crime scene, but no eyewitness …
The applicant, Sarvesh Kumar, was charged with murder under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 61(2)(a) of the BNS and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the informant's son on 7 July 2024. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was the sole assailant, citing the FIR and statements …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamata Prasad Tiwari, accused under Sections 103(1) and 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 30 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing that the star witness, the informant‑victim, had turned hostile and withdrawn her earlier …
The applicant, husband of a deceased woman, sought bail in a criminal case alleging smothering, invoking Sections 85, 80(2), 103(1), 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He claimed the death was accidental, stating his wife’s dupatta got caught in his motorcycle wheel, and that he …
The applicant, Dhakan Lal, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 506 of 2023) involving IPC sections 302, 504 and 34. He claimed innocence and argued that he had already been in custody for over two years, assuring the court he would not misuse liberty. The State opposed bail, noting that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazr Ali @ Husaini, who was charged under Sections 140(2), 103(1) and 238(a) of the BNS in a case involving the recovery of a dead body. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that he was falsely implicated, that the recovery was a sham, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Manish, accused in Crime No. 62 of 2025 under Section 103(1) BNS for a death that occurred at his residence. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the deceased had an illicit relationship with the applicant's sister, …
The applicant, Sugreev Kumar, was arrested in connection with Crime No.168 of 2025 under Sections 103 and 238A of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have been implicated by an informant present at a cremation. The applicant contended that he is innocent, the FIR lacks specific date and time details, …
Smt Aarti applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) alleging she was falsely implicated in the death of a person who allegedly died by electrocution. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed twelve days after the incident, no post‑mortem was conducted, and the only incriminating …
Vishwas applied for bail in a murder case (Crime No.84 of 2025) where the prosecution alleges that he, along with co‑accused Ramkesh Kushwaha and Gulbasar, abducted the informant's father, consumed alcohol and then slaughtered him on 22 June 2025. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighting a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anil, who was arrested in Crime No. 104 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the only eyewitness evidence pertained to a co-accused, Sangeeta, with no …
Riyazuddin was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.31 of 2025) after a FIR was lodged fifteen hours after the incident. The FIR initially named three accused and later, on the same day, the informant implicated Riyazuddin as the perpetrator. The applicant contended that there was no …
The applicant Rampal sought bail in a murder case (Crime No. 241 of 2025) alleging he killed the informant's mother on 16 May 2025. The prosecution argued that the FIR was filed 18 hours after the incident, a recovered weapon was linked to the applicant, and call data records placed him near the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shadab Ahmad @ Saddam in a case under IPC Sections 103(1) and 352, alleging assault on the informant's father. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR, lack of eyewitnesses, and CCTV footage that showed he was present …
