Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
246 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Jiwan Bima Rashratiya Sahkari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel later moved that the petition should be dismissed as it had become infructuous. The …
The petitioner, Mohar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. did not object to the withdrawal. The Court allowed the withdrawal application, dismissed the writ …
Petitioner Smt Neetu filed a writ petition seeking information on whether a demolition order exists concerning Plot No. 46, which was carved out of a larger plot in Village Arra, Kanpur Nagar. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 18 September 2026 to the Kanpur Development Authority (KDA) …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Pandey and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and the Special Land Acquisition Officer to determine, award and pay full compensation for land acquired in 1981 for a dam project, along with interest and solatium. They alleged that …
The petitioner, Anup Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel identified defects in the petition and expressed a desire not to pursue it further. The State respondents and the contesting respondent’s counsel raised no objection …
The petitioners alleged that respondents No. 7 and 8 sold a portion of land, which did not belong to them, to respondent No. 6 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. They sought a direction to the Collector to adjudicate …
Virat Paradise Private Ltd filed a writ petition alleging that the Public Works Department placed red marks outside its campus, ostensibly to facilitate demolition of its boundary wall. The petitioner claimed no encroachment existed, supported by a PWD report dated 26‑02‑2026, and sought a direction …
Anand Kumar Agarwal filed a writ petition challenging remarks made by a respondent regarding alleged encroachment on a road adjacent to his plot, which he claimed was not his responsibility as the land belonged to the Public Works Department. The Varanasi Development Authority produced an order …
The petitioners sought compensation for the remaining 0.1610 hectares of land after a sale deed of 0.3000 hectares was declared void. They requested that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition for compensation. The petitioners were informed that any …
The petitioners sought compensation for 0.1610 hectares of land after a sale deed covering 0.3000 hectares of the total 0.4610 hectares was declared void. They approached the High Court seeking a writ for the same. Subsequently, the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the writ and instead …
Petitioner Zaheeruddin @Zaheer Mistri and another filed a writ petition challenging a sealing order dated 28 July 2026. The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition and instead join an appeal filed under section 28(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 before the …
Petitioner Sanjay Verma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice Chairman of the Agra Development Authority to demarcate plot no.602 in Chhipi Tola, Sabji Mandi, Agra. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be compelled to demarcate the plot under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to halt construction on their private land and to compel the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings with full compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State …
The petitioner, Vishal Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The respondent's counsel and the Standing Counsel raised no objection to the dismissal. The Court considered the lack …
The petitioner, Nakshatra Vinay Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner indeed …
Harbhajan Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Hansraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (respondent No.2) to decide his application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to register a sale/sub‑lease deed for Plot C‑519. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to decide his application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to execute a sale/sub‑lease deed for a plot in NRI City. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision in Civil Appeal …
Mrs. Abha Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to decide her application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to register a sale deed for a plot in NRI City. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision (Civil Appeal No.11052 of 2025) …
The petitioner, Sakeel Ahmad Khan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition alleged issues related to betterment or improvement charges, but the record showed that no such demand had been raised. The court examined …
The petitioner, Smt. Lokesh, was allotted Plot No. VL-51 by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) which was later cancelled on 10 February 2025 on the ground that the land had been re‑allotted to other tenure‑holders. The petitioner challenged the cancellation and the …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that it should be dismissed as not pressed and that the petitioner may file a fresh petition later. The State …
The petitioners, Jitendra Dhar Dwivedi and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the pendency of the petition, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal …
Petitioners Pradeep Kumar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because a charge-sheet had been filed in the underlying criminal case. The court examined this submission and found …
The petitioners, Madina Masjid and another, challenged a notice dated 20 July 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) ordering demolition of constructions on a 0.1940‑hectare plot where the Masjid stands. They sought certiorari to quash the notice and …
The petitioner, Brijraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. (respondent No. 3) to upload his new caste certificate on the E‑District website in place of the old 1988 manual certificate, and also to decide his representation dated 18‑08‑2026 within the stipulated …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the railway authorities to pay compensation for land on which a railway track was constructed without formal acquisition. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 establishing a District …
The petitioner alleged that certain lands were taken over without proper acquisition, referencing an acquisition that occurred in 1976, but failed to specify the date of possession. The respondent argued that the claim was stale and should have been raised in the year of acquisition, relying on the …
Petitioner Niranjan Singh filed a writ petition alleging inaction on a representation he had made to the Commissioner of Police, Commissionarate, Ghaziabad. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, argued that the appropriate forum for deciding the representation was the District …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was made, but no rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) award was issued as required by the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency …
Petitioners Prateek Dev and five others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to release their land in Village Manchna, Mainpuri, which had been earmarked for acquisition under a government order dated 06‑03‑2025 for a bypass project, or to pay compensation as …
The petitioners, Rabal Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The Standing Counsel for the State and the counsel for …
Petitioner Zeeshan Ahmad Fareed filed a writ petition seeking to quash a show‑cause notice issued under Section 27(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and to restrain the demolition of Mustafa Masjid, invoking Supreme Court directions in In Re: Directions in the matter …
The Aims Green Avenue Welfare Association filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39073 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the petition contained mistakes and …
The petitioners, Sandeep and four others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to allot them 10% of developed Abadi land as per a 2011 Full Bench order in Gajraj v. State of U.P., and additionally 4% …
The petitioner, Smt Nirmala Devi, filed a writ petition challenging an appellate order dated 12 May 2026 passed under Section 27(2) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973. The respondent authorities argued that the petitioner could seek a revision before the State Government. The Court, …
The petitioners, owners of plot no. 266‑Kha (2.47 acres), alleged that the State of U.P. and other respondents were illegally dumping seized and abandoned vehicles on their land. They filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to stop the dumping. The Court examined the records and held that the …
The petitioners, Green View Heights Apartment Owners, filed a writ petition challenging a complaint dated 18 July 2025 filed against the Ghaziabad Development Authority and others. The respondents informed the Court that the complaint had been adjudicated and an order was passed on 15 July 2026, a …
The petitioner, Mustkin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief pending the filing of a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the writ petition …
The petitioners, Dilshad and ten others, challenged the appointment of a specific individual as a fair price shop agent, alleging impropriety. They filed a public interest litigation seeking to set aside the appointment. The petition relied on Clause 13(3) of the U.P. Essential Commodities …
Arjun Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of an alleged encroacher (respondent No.5) from Gaon Sabha land (Gata No.90). The State of U.P. and six other respondents opposed the relief, arguing that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue …
Arun Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of alleged encroachers (respondents 4‑10) from three plots of Nagar Palika land (Plot Nos. 2091, 2261 and 1932). The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Nagar Palika, contended that the petitioner could obtain …
The petitioner, Sachchidanand Verma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents (the State of U.P. and the Azamgarh Development Authority) to decide a pending case (No/AZDA/ANI/2024/0000750, State vs Renu Verma) and his application dated 16‑02‑2026 expeditiously. The petitioner …
The petitioners challenged a demolition order dated 2 December 2021 that was preceded by a final notice on 31 July 2021 and a subsequent notice on 13 August 2021. They argued that the Prayagraj Development Authority’s inaction from 2021 to 2026 amounted to a waiver of the notice and the order, and …
Petitioner Rekha Bhati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) to decide on her application for transfer of allotment rights of a residential plot in favor of a third party, Subhash Chandra, and also sought direction to the …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) to execute a lease‑back deed for their 0.1150‑hectare share of plot No.152M, to prevent any allotment of that share to others, to protect their possession, and to consider a representation …
The petitioner, Sandeep Titoriya, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court alleging that he represented the aggrieved public. The court was asked to determine whether the petitioner had the requisite standing to file the writ and whether the petition was pressed. Counsel …
The petitioner, Najare Alam, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide on a representation dated 9 July 2026 and to ensure deposit of Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees State Insurance (ESI) contributions for …
Petitioner Smt. Sunita filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38281 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The counsel for Greater Noida and the standing counsel also expressed no objection to the …
Shashank filed a public interest litigation alleging that private individuals had encroached upon Gaon Sabha land in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner sought the High Court's intervention to stop the encroachment. The Court examined whether it could entertain the petition or whether the petitioner had …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the NOIDA Authority and related officials to demolish an unauthorised construction on Plot D‑07, Sector 40, Noida, and to restrain further violations of the sanctioned building plan. They also requested inspection, measurement, and enforcement …
The petitioners, Vikram Singh and nine others, challenged a 21‑April‑2022 order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer that rejected their application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was filed 14 days after the award was passed. They relied on a prior …
Petitioners Lila Singh and another challenged the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer dated 21‑04‑2022 which rejected their application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was filed 14 days after the prescribed period. They relied on a prior decision …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.05.2025 that gave rise to a criminal case under sections 352, 351(1) and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties later informed the court that they had entered into a compromise and a matrimonial alliance. The …
The petitioners, including Guddi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. They contended that they are adults who voluntarily married each other and that Guddi Devi's age was incorrectly …
Petitioners Naresh Kumar and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They later moved an application seeking dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The Standing Counsel for the respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined the application, noted the lack of …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and they received compensation, but no rehabilitation and resettlement award under the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The petitioner, Vishwanath Singh, sought restoration of a kiosk allotment originally granted in 1988 after it was cancelled in January 2025 for non‑payment of a premium that had accrued to Rs. 2,52,374.55. He also requested that the authority consider his application under the One‑Time Settlement …
Balwan Sing filed a review application challenging an order dated 24 April 2026 in Writ‑C No.10711 of 2026. The High Court examined the petition and observed that the applicant had approached the Court belatedly. Relying on several Supreme Court decisions, the Court held that the delay precluded any …
Petitioners Gulab Singh and three others filed a writ petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under Sections 104/105 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that they are not members of the Scheduled Caste and therefore the embargo under Section 98 does not apply. The State, …
Petitioner Kapil filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Varanasi, to decide Appeal No. 3962 of 2024 filed under the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed time. The petitioner claimed to be the opposite party in …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the respondent Awas Vikas Parishad to restrain the sale and construction on agricultural land (plot no. 193, 0.534 hectare) and to prevent interference with possession. A parallel civil suit (Original Suit No. 306 of 2005) was already pending for the same …
The petitioner claimed that plot no. C/84 in Ghaziabad was allotted to him but possession was not handed over, prompting a District Consumer Forum order directing the Ghaziabad Development Authority to refund his deposits with 12% interest. The Authority allegedly continued demanding additional …
Shyamsundar Singh, a recorded tenure holder of two plots in Deoria, challenged the compensation awards dated 16‑02‑2024 and the supplementary award dated 10‑07‑2024 issued by the Additional District Magistrate under Section 3‑G of the National Highways Act, 1956. He contended that the mandatory …
The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Union of India to pay compensation for Arazi No. 472, alleging a right over the land. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 providing that such claims be examined by a District Level Committee for compensation under the …
Petitioners Dilip Kumar Gupta and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08‑07‑2026 in the case of Vitula Devi v. Dilip Kumar Gupta & Ors., and a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority of India not to disburse …
The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the State respondents, particularly respondent No.2, to pay compensation for their land that became unusable after submergence caused by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam. They relied on a prior coordinate bench decision (Writ‑C No.25521 of 2022) which …
The petitioner, Ms. Kusum Bhati, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. The respondents objected, arguing that a petition cannot be filed merely against a notice. The Court accepted the respondents' preliminary objection, directing …
The petitioners, M/s KMP Industries, challenged a notice dated 23 June 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation, arguing that it was contrary to the Uttar Pradesh Warehousing and Logistics Policy, 2018 and a Government Order of 23 July 2020. The respondents contended …
The petitioner’s land was acquired for widening a road to an airport, and he agreed to sell the land for Rs. 77,04,330 and his house for Rs. 1,47,212. After the acquisition, possession was taken and the house was demolished. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking compensation, alleging that …
Petitioner Bhure Ali challenged two notices dated 10 July 2026—one issued under the Uttar Pradesh (Regulation of Building Operations) Act, 1958 and another under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006—seeking demolition of his house. The petitioner argued that the State must give him notice and …
The petitioner, Raghunath, sold a parcel of land to respondent No.3 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, intending to transfer only 0.0426 hectare. He alleges that an additional 0.0970 hectare was taken without his …
The petitioners claimed that their agricultural land was rendered unusable after being submerged by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam and sought a mandamus directing the State to pay compensation and decide their application dated 20‑02‑2026 within a stipulated period. They relied on a prior …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and a district level committee to pay compensation for land submerged by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam and to decide their compensation application within a stipulated period. They relied on a prior coordinate bench decision …
The petitioners sought compensation after an award was passed under the National Highways Act, 1956. A notice dated 01‑04‑2016 required them to submit certain documents to the Prescribed Authority, but the record did not show whether they complied. The Court directed the petitioners to furnish all …
Petitioners Arvind Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The State filed a charge-sheet in the matter, after which the petitioners' counsel, Abhay Kumar Singh, moved that the petition be dismissed as it was no longer pressed. The …
The petitioners, Ramdev and ten others, filed a writ petition seeking that their representation/objection dated 13 March 2026 be considered by the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Pindra, District Varanasi. They requested the court to direct the SDO to decide the matter. The court, without …
The petitioner, M/s Unnati Udyog Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding further. No substantive …
The petitioner, Smt. Rajeshwari Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Housing Commissioner of U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad to decide a representation dated 25 March 2026 concerning the mutation of property records for Plot No. 14, Phase II, Navasheel Dham, Bithoor. The …
The petitioner, Omwati Widow, challenged a demolition order dated 3 April 2026 issued by the Noida Authority. The respondents argued that the appropriate remedy was a revision petition under Section 41(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, as empowered by Section 12 of …
The petitioners, Kashmira Singh and six others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amit Kumar, prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed and sought liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents did not object to the …
Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation for their land parcels, which they claim fall under the Uttar Pradesh Land Pooling Policy, but have been in possession of the Aligarh Development Authority since 2019 for a transport project. The Authority contended that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During proceedings, counsel for the petitioners identified procedural defects in the petition. They requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, while also seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The standing …
The petitioner, Madhusudan Yadav, complained that a road was being cut through his land to provide access to the house of Bhanu Pratap Yadav. The High Court observed that the dispute is essentially factual and therefore beyond the scope of writ jurisdiction. It noted that a civil suit (Original Suit …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State authorities to consider their pending land acquisition grievance applications, conduct fresh joint measurement of their land, reassess and pay fair compensation, and restrain demolition of their residence. The State argued …
The petitioner applied for a unit under a 5,000‑dwelling Residential Housing Scheme that was to be allotted by lottery, and the draw was held on 10 July 2018. He sought confirmation of his selection through a Right to Information (RTI) request but received no response, and subsequently approached …
The petitioner, Umesh Prasad Chaurasiya, a recorded tenure holder of a plot in Deoria, challenged an award dated 16‑02‑2024 passed by the Additional District Magistrate under Section 3‑G of the National Highways Act, alleging that no notice inviting objections was published as required by Section …
The petitioners, recorded tenure holders of two small plots in Deoria, challenged a supplementary award dated 20‑07‑2024 that determined compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956. They contended that the award was passed without the mandatory notice required by Section …
The petitioners, Mehtab Alam and another, claimed that their land became unusable due to the construction of an expressway and that the Uttar Pradesh Expressways Industrial Development Authority (UPEIDA) had ordered on 7 August 2025 to provide them an alternative plot, which had not been …
The petitioners, Aakansha Bahuguna and three others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The standing counsel for the respondents did not oppose this request. The …
The petitioner, Hansraji, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to investigate alleged illegal construction of a road (Rasta) on his land, to hear his objections, and to provide compensation if the land was acquired unlawfully. He also requested expedited consideration of his …
M/s Sun International Limited filed a writ petition challenging the finalization of a bid by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). The petitioners sought relief, but the respondent counsel informed the court that the bid had already been finalized, eliminating any pending cause of …
The petitioners, Hira Singh Rawat and 48 others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to execute a sublease deed for flats in Greater Noida and to decide a representation dated 27.07.2026 within a stipulated time. They also sought costs and any other appropriate relief. …
The petitioner, M/s Tridev Enterprises, entered into an agreement with the State of U.P. to capture stray animals on the Bundelkhand Expressway and subsequently claimed Rs.89,17,448. When the amount was not paid, the petitioner filed a writ petition and also submitted a representation on 5 June 2026 …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Nevatia, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 7814 of 2021) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Subsequently, the petitioner's counsel submitted an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the …
The petitioner, M/s Svarrnim Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition (Writ No. 31488 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later expressed a desire not to pursue the petition and applied for its withdrawal. The respondent State of U.P. and others, through their counsel, …
The petitioner, Smt. Samundari Devi, challenged an order dated 23.07.2026 directing demolition of a structure on Plot No. 215 in Greater Noida, alleging that no prior notice was given. The respondents, the State of U.P. and the Greater Noida Authorities, contended that the demolition order itself …
The petitioner, Dev Narayan Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the removal of a poultry farm operated by respondents 5 and 6, alleging severe pollution, and also sought an order compelling the District Magistrate to decide his complaint within a fixed period. The court …
The petitioners filed an online mutation application with the Kanpur Development Authority on 28 June 2022 (Computer ID No.124130) and alleged that it had not been decided. They approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction for the Authority to decide the application. The respondents, …
The petitioner, Smt. Umesh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it, intending to file a fresh petition with the correct parties. The respondent State of U.P. and two other respondents, through their counsel, raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Jain, received a notice for non‑payment of water‑connection installation charges and paid the amount under protest, claiming that only one connection was provided and the charge for a second connection was erroneous. He filed a representation on 1 July 2026 seeking …
Bhagat Singh filed a revision petition under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, seeking a speedy decision. The respondents agreed that the revision should be decided expeditiously. The Court, without examining the merits, directed that the revision be decided as soon …
The petitioners sought the quashing of a building permission and No Objection Certificate granted to private respondents for land that allegedly lies within a prohibited highway safety buffer zone, and also demanded mandamus directing the District Magistrate to decide a restoration application and …
The petitioner sought to quash a notification acquiring his land in Rehra village, to set aside a circle‑rate list that omitted his property, and to compel the Collector and the acquiring authority to revise the circle rate and award compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1989. Relying on the …
The petitioner, Ranjana Goswami, paid money on behalf of Sardar Manohar Singh to the Varanasi Development Authority and sought the execution of a sale deed either in her name or in the name of Sardar Manohar Singh, but the Authority failed to act. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Chauhan, complained that his neighbour (respondent No.6) was polluting the atmosphere and dumping garbage on his land. He filed a complaint with the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) on 10 November 2025, which issued a notice to the respondent on 22 November …
The petitioners, GS Express Ltd., challenged the declaration of Respondent No.7 as the L‑1 bidder and technically qualified in Tender No. YEA/GM(P)/2026/495, alleging procedural irregularities, improper consideration of subcontractor experience, and incorrect bid capacity calculations. They sought …
The petitioners, who are existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters despite completing surveys and selection. The petitioners filed a writ petition …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Varanasi to consider their grievance and decide an application dated 20‑05‑2026 within a stipulated time. The State respondents pointed to a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 which provides that such claims should be …
The petitioners purchased flats from OMEX Company based on a brochure promising that 60% of the land would be used for sports and recreational facilities. The builder later sought to convert the land for commercial purposes, prompting the petitioners to submit a representation to the Greater Noida …
M/s Star Brick Industries, operating a brick‑kiln, sought renewal of its Consolidated Consent to Operate under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The consent, originally valid until 31 July 2026, was revoked on 19 August 2025 for alleged non‑compliance, but the revocation was …
Manorama Tripathi filed a writ petition alleging that Plot Nos. 238‑Ka and 238‑Kha in Village Bhaluhi Madaripatti were taken over by respondents without any acquisition process or compensation. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy under a Government Order …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, owns three agricultural plots in Village Kudwa, Kanpur Nagar, and alleges that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other authorities are constructing and extending the Damar Asphalt Road over his land without acquiring it or paying compensation under the Right to Fair …
Vikram Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain the Special Land Acquisition Officer/District Magistrate from disbursing compensation for land acquisition (Gata No.460) to any private respondents until the final disposal of Writ B No.27 of 2026, and also requested that the officer …
Petitioner Prahlad Sharma filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not interfere with his peaceful possession of land (Khasra No. 682) and not undertake any construction without due process, also claiming damages under the Right to Fair Compensation and …
Sarnam Singh filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Kanpur Development Authority under Section 26Ka(4) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, seeking a direction that his reply to the notice be decided promptly and that no coercive action be taken against him. The …
The petitioners, a group of street vendors, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of several orders of the Noida Authority and mandamus directing the authority to protect their vending items and issue vending certificates under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street …
Harshit Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging the sealing of its shop by the Chief Environment Officer, Aligarh, under Section 31(A) of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The petitioner argued that it is a small‑scale key‑making unit with no hazardous emissions and that …
The petitioner, Parmanand, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 01‑09‑2023 and a subsequent order dated 28‑04‑2025 issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Noida Authority, alleging that his structures were on unacquired land. Earlier, the Division Bench had directed the …
Petitioner Rajan Lal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) to consider his representation dated 27 May 2025 and refer the dispute to the Principal Civil Court under Section 3H(4) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitioner limited his …
Sourya Estates Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, owned one‑third shares in two plots that were acquired by the government and an award for compensation was made on 30‑12‑2023. The company filed a writ petition seeking the disbursement of the awarded compensation, …
The petitioner, Ram Chandra Kushwaha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Nigam Prayagraj/Prayagraj Development Authority to pay compensation for land acquired in Arazi No.840 (0.491 hectare). The State counsel highlighted a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 which mandates …
Dr. Wasim Ahmad Siddiqui filed a writ petition seeking to quash the demolition of his property by the Union of India and other respondents, to obtain compensation for the land and structures, and to have the disputed area demarcated. He later indicated he would not pursue the demarcation relief as …
The petitioner, Smt Sushma Katiyar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation for her land acquisition based on the current residential circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate. The State of U.P. and other respondents objected, arguing that the …
Petitioner Puneet Kumar Vishwakarma filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and other respondents to pay compensation for his land acquisition based on the current residential circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate. The State, through its standing counsel, objected that …
Petitioner Hari Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Arbitration) to decide an arbitration under Section 3G(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The respondents contended that the petition was not maintainable …
The petitioners, Ram Din and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Ashutosh Mishra, on behalf of B.P. Vishwakarma, argued that the petition …
The petitioners, Ashutosh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Agra Development Authority. The respondents submitted instructions and the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Tripathi, argued that the petition should be …
The petitioner, an elderly SC/ST widow, was allotted a dwelling under the Manyawar Shri Kanshiram Ji Shahri Garib Awas Yojna but was served an eviction notice by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) without a hearing. She challenged the notice, seeking quashing of the order and mandamus for …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to release two plots of land allotted for an OPEC Hospital or, alternatively, to acquire the land under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 with …
Petitioner Poonam Vishwakarma, who acquired rights over land that had already been acquired by the State of Uttar Pradesh under the National Highways Act, 1956 for a Ring Road, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus for compensation or possession of the land and for a decision on her …
The appellant, a Class‑IV employee promoted to Class‑III in 1997, claimed that he should have been promoted to Grade‑II in January 2001 based on seniority, but was denied and later promoted only on 30‑Oct‑2004 without retrospective pay. He filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the order …
The petitioner, Jyotika Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the fourth respondent to consider and decide her restoration application within the prescribed time. The respondents contended that the application had already been rejected on 25‑07‑2017, rendering the relief sought …
The petitioner, Swapnil Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority not to interfere with his peaceful possession of a house in Bulandshahr. The petitioner argued that the Authority's demolition …
Bhim Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to allot him his 50% share of a disputed land parcel, amounting to 285.25 square meters and a monetary sum of Rs 62,75,500, based on a Supreme Court order in his brother Pratap Singh's case. He relied …
Petitioners Dev Singh and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant them compensation and benefits recommended by the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee in its report dated 03‑03‑2023 under the Right to Fair …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Tripathi and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and others to pay compensation for land acquired for a highway at the roadside rate. The respondents, represented by the Additional Chief Standing Counsel, contended that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired by the Union of India in Ghazipur district. They claimed that the respondents had not paid adequate compensation for Arazi No. 34 and 12. The respondents pointed to a Government Order dated 12 May 2016, which mandates that …
The petitioner, Tulsi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking that a claim/representation dated 12 January 2026 pending before the second respondent be decided within the stipulated period. The respondents, including the State of U.P., contended that if the representation remains pending, it would be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of a notice dated 21.01.2026 issued under the U.P. Road Side Land Control Act, 1945. The State, through its Additional Chief Standing Counsel, raised two objections: that the proceedings under the Act were still pending and that the petitioners …
Petitioner Maulana Furkan Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated 09.04.2026 passed by the controlling authority under Section 10 of the U.P. (Regulations of Building Operations) Act, 1958, which directed demolition of his residential construction. He alleged that the …
The French Apartment Owner Association filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the water supply authority (respondent no. 4) to bifurcate water charges against a private respondent (no. 3), to accept charges from 27‑09‑2024 without penal interest, and to restrain coercive recovery measures. …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Tyagi, claimed to be a lawful holder of transferable bhumidhar rights over a 0.8433‑hectare parcel of land in Mathurapur, Ghaziabad, which had been declared non‑agricultural by an order of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 143 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950, and …
The petitioners, who are existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014 in various work circles and sectors, but the Noida Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters despite completing surveys and selection. They filed a writ …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Basti to decide a representation they had filed on 22 May 2025 concerning compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. …
Ram Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation for 0.144 hectare of his land that was used for constructing a canal, relying on a recommendation dated 06‑09‑2019 issued by the Executive Engineer. The land had earlier been the subject of a 2015 writ (Writ‑C No. 68956 of …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) to consider their claim for allotment of 6% developed abadi land in lieu of land acquired from them. GNIDA opposed the relief, arguing it was not permissible under the applicable scheme. …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Jaiswal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Ved Prakash Mishra, submitted that the petition was not pressed and that the …
The petitioners sought a direction that the District Magistrate award compensation at the prevailing market rate for a 1.3680‑hectare parcel of land that had been partially acquired for the Madhya Ganga Canal Project. They argued that while one portion was sold at a higher rate in a deed dated …
The petitioners, a group of existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014 in Work Circle 1‑10, paid the required fees, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters. They filed a writ petition alleging …
The petitioners, who are existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014 in Work Circle 1‑10, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters despite completing surveys and selection. The petitioners filed …
Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Kanpur Development Authority to complete the demarcation of Arazi No. 481, a minzumla plot of which the petitioner claims 1,000 sq. metres. The Authority had already constituted a committee of six revenue officials …
Petitioners, a group of allottee owners, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, including the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, to execute a sub‑lease deed in their favour and to decide a representation filed on 6 April 2026 within a stipulated time. The …
Petitioners (Adityaagarwal and 22 others) filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, including the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, to execute a sub‑lease deed in favour of the allottee(s) of Ajnara Homes and to decide a representation dated 15‑04‑2026 within …
The petitioners, Kailash and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to pay additional compensation for a parcel of land (Gata No. 756, 0.1180 hectare) in Ghazipur district and to decide a representation filed on 09‑09‑2025. The …
Petitioner Subhash Pandey filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but later expressed that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, allowing him to file a fresh petition if desired. The State respondents …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and two authorities to pay compensation for land allegedly encroached by the National Highway Authority of India and to restrain the release of compensation to other beneficiaries. The State counsel highlighted a Government Order dated …
Petitioner Qazi Tavassul Husain filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the Uttar Pradesh Development Authority to approve his map, halt demolition of his construction, and issue a reasoned order on his representations. He argued that his small holding does not require permission under the …
Petitioner Amir Azam filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18‑April‑2022 passed by an arbitrator/district magistrate and a mandamus directing the respondents to decide arbitration case No. 1622/2022 on merit. The respondents contended that the …
The petitioner, Goodworth Reality Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, requesting its dismissal as not pressed and seeking liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The State …
The petitioners, co‑owners of land acquired in Siddharthnagar, filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the State to complete the acquisition process and release fair‑market compensation, alleging they were excluded from compensation granted to the other co‑sharer. The petitioners relied on a 2016 …
Petitioners Mohan Lal Sharma and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to decide execution case No. 151 of 2025 (Jhamman Lal & others v. State of U.P.) within a fixed period, alleging inordinate delay. The petition relied on the order sheet …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to decide execution case No. 150 of 2025 (Banwari Lal & others v. State of U.P.) within a fixed period, alleging inordinate delay. The petition relied on the order sheet of the execution case to demonstrate the …
Petitioners Gayatri Devi and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Presiding Officer of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide execution case No. 148 of 2025 (Fakir Chand & others v. State of U.P.) within a reasonable …
Krishna Kumar and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to decide execution case No.152 of 2025 (Netrapal Singh et al. v. State of U.P.) within a fixed time. The petitioners alleged inordinate delay in the execution proceedings …
Petitioners Chhatar Pal Sharma and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Presiding Officer of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority to decide execution case No.149 of 2025 (Musammat Kalawati & others v. State of U.P.) within a fixed period, alleging …
Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or seek adjournment when the matter was listed. The court noted the absence of any effective representation and held that the cause of action had become stale due to the passage of time. Consequently, the writ …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to delete its name from the revenue record for Plot No. 161 (2.90 acres) and to record the petitioners' name. The respondents argued that the entry had already been rectified and that the petitioners must follow the procedure laid down in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or file any adjournment request. The State respondents were represented before the court. The court observed that due to the petitioners' non‑appearance, the cause of action had become stale and the petition was …
Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not seek any adjournment. The Court noted the absence of effective representation and held that the cause of action had become stale due to the passage of time. Consequently, the petition was …
M/S S.K. Wheat Products Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and not press it further. The State respondents, represented by standing counsel, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …
Omwati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to allot plot no. 9 in Sector 16B of the Sikandra Yojna, Agra, and to prevent its allotment to anyone else. The petition relied on a pending Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 25398 of 2004 filed by another applicant, Ashok Kumar …
Mohan Ji Dubey filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an award of Rs. 18,85,380 determining compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956, and to compel the National Highway Authority of India to fix land rates as per a 2022 order. The respondents …
The petitioners, Smt. Babita Agarwal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the petition should be dismissed as not pressed, granting them liberty to file a fresh petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents did not oppose this …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to decide a representation dated 20 June 2022. An amendment was filed to specifically include a prayer for the Sub-Divisional Magistrate/Deputy Collector of Kanpur to decide the representation within a …
Petitioner Jainul Abadin filed Writ Petition No. 17363 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a wish to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue relief in the pending suit proceedings. The State’s standing counsel consented to this …
The petitioners, whose land was acquired by the State for industrial development, received a statutory award in 2008 which was later enhanced by a 2020 reference. They filed an application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act on 1 September 2020 seeking re‑determination of compensation, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Pundhir, bought a plot of land in Hathras in 2012 and built a house, but his name was never entered in the revenue records. The land was later acquired for National Highway 530B under a 2022 notification, and an award was passed in September 2023, yet no compensation …
Petitioners Rakesh Das and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to act on a representation dated 18 January 2026 and to pay compensation. The State respondents objected, arguing that the petition was based on vague pleadings, was stale, and suffered …
Manoj Kumar, a tenure holder of land acquired for the Delhi‑Dehradun Economic Corridor, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to pay compensation as ordered by the Additional District Judge/Special Judge on 28‑Nov‑2025. Despite that order and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh, YEIDA, NHAI and the District Magistrate of Hathras to decide their representation dated 10‑12‑2025 for payment of compensation and interest for land acquired at Village Bichpuri. They claimed the land …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authorities to fix and demarcate Plot No.212A in Greater Noida, relying on a possession certificate dated 28‑09‑2020 and a lease‑hold transfer deed dated 19‑10‑2020. The petitioner also asked the court to compel the …
Petitioners Ayodhya Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners later contended that no cause of action remained, rendering the petition infructuous. The respondents did not oppose this submission. The Court examined the submissions and found that the …
Petitioners Narendra Kumar Sharma and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel submitted that no cause of action survived, rendering the petition infructuous. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to this submission. The Court …
The petitioner, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and the Noida Authority to allot a 5% compensation of Abadi land under the NOIDA scheme. The Court examined the petition and noted that the issue falls within the jurisdiction of the Noida …
The mother of an 18‑month‑old child filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the father had forcibly taken the child away. The Single Judge dismissed the petition, holding that the child was in the father's custody and directing the mother to seek relief under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and …
Smt. Dharmwati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide her representation dated 5 February 2026 by a reasoned order within a stipulated time. The petitioner limited the prayer to a direction for timely decision, not the merits of the …
The petitioner, M/s Arora RCC Works, challenged an order dated 03.05.2025 that required it to repair a leakage in an overhead water tank and withheld regulation fees and security deposits. The High Court noted that a fact‑finding enquiry ordered earlier had been completed, and an expert from Aligarh …
M/s Rani Promoters Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The court held that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Gangadhar Tiwari, suffered 40% permanent disability after contacting a live 11,000 kV wire that had been reported broken but not repaired by the electricity department. He filed a claim under Section 6(1) of the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and was awarded Rs 4 lakhs by the …
M/S Jai Industries filed a review application challenging an order dated 19.01.2026, alleging an apparent error in paragraph 6 of that order. The applicant changed counsel for the review, obtaining a No Objection Certificate from the earlier counsel but did not make the earlier counsel a co‑counsel. …
The petitioner, Mahesh Chand, owner of a commercial premises in Varanasi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate to decide a representation dated 22‑04‑2025 and to award compensation of Rs.1,83,60,000 at the commercial valuation rate of Rs.90,000 per square metre, …
M/S Indu Timber Products Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority raised a preliminary objection questioning the maintainability of the petition. The …
The petitioner, Sarni, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. No counsel or party appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The judges noted the absence of any appearance and consequently ordered that …
The petitioner, claiming ownership of portions of Plot No. 216 in Agra, sought a mandamus directing the Agra Development Authority (ADA) to decide a representation dated 01.07.2025 and to recalculate external development charges after accounting for payments already made by the Society. The …
The petitioner, a registered owner of two plots in Mathura, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a 2018 order that withheld compensation for land acquisition and directing payment of compensation and solatium under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
The petitioners, owners of several land parcels in Ghaziabad, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Development Authority to pay compensation under the 2013 DPR scheme and to decide an objection filed on 11.11.2023. They argued that their earlier petition (Writ No. 5673 of 2020) was …
Anand Shankar Pathak filed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The court observed that the cause of action had become stale due to the passage …
The appellant, C/M Sri Ram Shanker Sachchidanand Pal Inter College, filed a special appeal but failed to appear before the High Court. No adjournment was sought and the respondents were represented. The Court observed that the cause of action had become stale, rendering the appeal infructuous due to …
