Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
246 judgments · newest first · showing 201–246
The appellants filed Special Appeal No. 497 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants and no adjournment was sought. The court observed that the cause of action had become stale, rendering the appeal infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, …
In Public Interest Litigation No. 207 of 2026, the petitioner, Umesh Chand Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Gaurav Sharan Srivastava, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The standing counsel for the State …
The petitioner, Dinesh Chandr Shukla, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Joint Secretary, Zone 3 Veterment Regularization, Kanpur. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear and did not seek any adjournment. The respondent's counsel …
The petitioner, a priest, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the removal of alleged illegal encroachments on land belonging to Shiv Ji Mandir in Ghazipur district, and also sought costs. The petition was filed in his individual capacity, and the respondents were …
The petitioners, Mool Adivasi Janjati Kalyan Sanstha and another, filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and a recruitment board to conduct a transparent enquiry into alleged fraudulent caste certificates and to prevent such candidates from being …
Lakhan Singh filed a writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders to compel various state respondents to decide his representation, vacate mud fill, stop construction, and remove mud from his agricultural land in Prayagraj. The State Government’s standing counsel highlighted a Government Order …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 seeking mandamus to remove alleged illegal encroachments on government land (plots 2016 and 2093) in Konch, Jalaun, and to compel revenue authorities to decide a representation dated 27‑02‑2025. The respondents contended that the …
The petitioners, owners of houses along State Highway No. 21, challenged a notice dated 26‑06‑2025 issued by the fifth respondent ordering demolition of their properties to facilitate highway widening. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the notice and a mandamus to restrain demolition. The …
The petitioners, owners of a settlement in Ashdullapur village outside the Nagar Nigam limits, filed a writ petition fearing demolition of their structures by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). They sought a mandamus directing the Authority not to demolish or harass them and to …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Seth, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf on the scheduled date and no adjournment was sought. The court held that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner’s failure to prosecute the petition. …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to pay compensation for his land that became unusable after being submerged by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam. He also asked the court to order the respondents to decide his compensation …
The petitioner, Bake Singh, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent to enforce a City Magistrate's order dated 11‑11‑2025 that ordered removal of an illegal encroachment on road land (Gata Nos.161/162/163). The State, through its …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Chaurasiya, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and four other respondents. The petition sought relief on unspecified grounds. During the hearing, the petitioner's own counsel, Ashish Kumar Ojha, submitted that the …
The Factory Owners Association and four others filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to halt construction of a Rail Over Bridge on government land in the Nunhai Industrial Estate, Agra, and to shift the project elsewhere. The …
The petitioner, Harish Chandra Ramkali Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate/Additional Collector (L.A.) in Ghaziabad to decide L.A.R. No. 18 of 2021 (Raj Kumar Paliwal v. State of U.P. & Others) under Section 64 of the Land …
The petitioner, a street vendor, applied for a vending shop under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014, in Noida but the Noida Authority failed to issue a license despite completing surveys. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief. The respondents argued that the Tribunal meant to …
The petitioner, Jai Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed abadi land from his acquired land in Gautam Budh Nagar. The petition alleged entitlement to specific parcels of land measured in hectares. The Court observed that the matter required a factual enquiry and declined …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not seek any adjournment. The respondents were represented. The court observed that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioners' non‑appearance, rendering the petition …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachment on pond land in Jaunpur and to act as per an apex court direction. The State, through its standing counsel, objected, contending that …
The petitioners, tenure holders of land slated for acquisition for a four‑lane National Highway, challenged the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer dated 02‑04‑2025 which rejected their claim for compensation. After the death of the husband (original tenure holder), the first petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Dhruv Pratap Singh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce a District Magistrate's order dated 19 September 2025 that required action against a sitting Gram Pradhan for alleged misuse of public funds. The …
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking an order to remove alleged illegal encroachments on public utility land (Arazi No.599 Ka) by respondents 6 to 13, relying on an earlier order dated 23‑04‑2025 issued under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The Nagar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to halt alleged illegal commercial construction on Khasra Nos. 1030 and 1063 in Ghaziabad, to order demolition of the structures under Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and to direct an inquiry into a purported …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, but the State respondents raised a preliminary objection that a similar dispute was already before the Division Bench in another PIL (No. 306 of 2026) and that filing a second petition violated the High Court Rules. …
Smt. Savitri Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 56722 of 2012) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The Court held that the cause of action had become stale and the petition was rendered infructuous due to …
M/S Pure Power Turbo Batteries Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 24441 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was listed on the top ten cases but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove alleged illegal encroachments on land in Mau district. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel argued that the matter had already been concluded under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and that the …
The Nagrik Sahakari Awas Samiti Ltd filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The court held that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner's failure to press the petition. Consequently, …
Petitioner Gajey Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 23848 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no adjournment was sought. The Court observed that the cause of action had become stale due to the petitioner’s failure to press the petition. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and the Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority to award compensation for specific land parcels (Gata No. 825D and 687) in Sunrakh Bangar, Mathura. The respondents argued that the claim had already been settled by the …
The petitioners, Sanju Rawat and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They later informed the Court that their grievance had already been resolved by the Agra Development Authority, rendering the petition without a surviving cause of action. The petitioners’ counsel …
The petitioners, Dharmveer Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on their behalf to press the petition and no adjournment was sought. The Court held that the cause of action had become stale and the petition was rendered infructuous due to the …
The petitioners, who purchased a building up to the third floor, challenged demolition and sealing orders dated 16‑04‑2024 and 18‑05‑2024 issued by the fourth respondent for alleged unauthorized construction. They sought certiorari to quash the orders, mandamus to prevent demolition, and to have the …
Petitioner Shambhu Singh Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and NHAI to release compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956, alleging that despite a notification the amount had not been paid. The respondents contended that the petitioner had …
The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the District Magistrate to decide a representation dated 04‑02‑2026 and to award compensation at Rs.297 per square yard with full escalation as per the 01‑09‑2015 order. The land in question had been acquired under …
The petitioner, Smt. Indira Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to execute a sale deed for a plot allotted to her. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition. The State …
Ravindra Singh filed a writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed abadi land from his acquired plot in Dadha village, Gautam Budh Nagar. The Court observed that the issue required a factual enquiry and therefore would not decide on the merits. It directed the petitioner to make a fresh …
Petitioner Ravindra Singh filed a writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed abadi land from his acquired parcels in Khasra No.49 and No.126 in Dadha village, Gautam Budh Nagar. The court observed that the claim required a factual enquiry and therefore refrained from deciding the merits. It …
Smt. Jaiwati filed a writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed abadi land from her acquired plot in Gautam Budh Nagar. The petition raised a procedural grievance that the authority had not granted the claimed allotment. The Court observed that the dispute required a factual enquiry and …
The petitioner, Kuverpal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed abadi land from his acquired land in Gautam Budh Nagar. The petition alleged that the authorities had not granted the requested portion. The Court observed that the matter required factual investigation and …
The Public Interest Litigation was filed in 2014 by Digvijay Raj Pandey and Afasar Khan. In 2025, a respondent filed an abatement application stating that both petitioners had died three and four years earlier. No application for substitution of the petitioners’ heirs or legal representatives was …
The petitioner, a former employee, applied in 1999 for a plot under the U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad’s Tatkal Scheme. The High Court earlier directed a fresh allotment, but the Supreme Court later held the Tatkin Scheme illegal and ordered refund of deposits with interest. The petitioner then filed …
The petitioners, Smt. Nanhi Agarwal and others, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not seek any adjournment. The respondents, the Arbitrator/District Collector Jhansi and others, were represented. The Court observed that in the absence of …
The petitioner, Dropati Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a press note dated 17 May 2013 issued by the Kanpur Development Authority (KDA) that purported to cancel the allotment of House No.13/25 (L.I.G.) in Ratanpur Colony, which had been allotted to her in December 2003 after payment of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner was not inclined to press the petition further. The respondent, represented by counsel for Bharat …
The petitioner, M/s Saraswati Infosoft Technology Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later expressed that it was not inclined to pursue the writ. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The respondents, including the State …
