Created by Fuzzy Cloud

MANISH KUMAR NIGAM

410 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

AWADHESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Awadhesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to grant him the 2nd and 3rd Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.) along with interest and arrears. He had already submitted a representation/application for the same, which was …

MEERA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Meera Chauhan and another filed a writ petition seeking a decision on their representations dated 23-07-2026 and 24-07-2026 for regularisation of their service. The standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the representations had already been made and that the court …

VARSHA GARGversusTHE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Varsha Garg filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 31.05.2026 that moved her from District Hapur to Kannauj after ten months of service. She sought a certiorari to quash the transfer and also raised a pending representation/application before the authority. The State's …

SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of two orders dated 10.08.2026 and 22.08.2026 and a mandamus directing the respondents to allow him to continue as a Rojgar Sewak in Gram Panchayat Battupur with due honorarium. He argued that his mother’s election as Gram …

RAKESH DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesh Dixit, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to grant him service benefits and pensionary benefits on the post of Lab Assistant, based on a pay grade of Rs. 4,600 approved on 19 September 2014 and a Government Order dated 5 …

SEEMA KUMARI @ SEEMA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Seema Kumari sought transfer from District Commissionerate, Agra to District Mathura on compassionate grounds and also asked the court to direct the respondent to decide her pending representation dated 04.08.2026. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus …

RAJ KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Maurya, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to transfer him from Kushinagar district to a Varanasi zone (Jaunpur, Gazipur or Chandauli) on compassionate grounds due to his mother's medical emergency, and also to compel the second respondent to …

DR. AWANISH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Awanish Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to consider his representation dated 30 March 2026 for promotion in the PMHS Cadre and entitlement to First and Second Special Assured Career Progression benefits, based on his seniority …

DIVAKAR ALIAS DIVAKAR YADAV AND 78 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 79 employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay arrears of salary fixed after the first and second Assured Career Progression (ACP) and to decide pending representations regarding those arrears. The petition also requested the court to …

SURESH THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suresh Thakur, sought a compassionate appointment after his father, a police barber who died in harness, was granted a post of Cook in the Police Department under the Dying in Harness Rules. The petitioner argued that he is a barber, lacks cooking skills, and a barber vacancy exists, …

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pass an order on his replies dated 03‑04‑2025 and 21‑04‑2026 seeking cancellation of a charge sheet dated 19‑03‑2025. The petitioner alleged that the authorities had not yet considered his …

SURAJ KANNAUJIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suraj Kannaujiya, cleared the Uttar Pradesh Police Constable written exam, medical test and was declared successful, but his appointment was cancelled after a character verification report revealed two pending criminal cases – one under Section 60 of the U.P. Excise Act and another …

JAI PRAKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider his claim that a forged high school marks sheet was used to obtain service in the Assam Rifles, and also to compel certain respondents to decide his representations dated 27 June 2025 …

SANJAY KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents, the State of U.P. and others, to consider his case without first approaching the appropriate authority for grievance redressal. The Court examined whether the petition was maintainable given the …

VIJAY KUMAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Pal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to conclude pending disciplinary proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 04-04-2023. The petitioner argued that the proceedings were unduly delayed and requested an expeditious decision. The …

PAVAN TEHARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pavan Tehariya, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Rahul Kumar Sharma, later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether the petition retained any operative purpose. Finding that it was indeed …

ONKAR NATH GAUNDversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Onkar Nath Gaund filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 15913 of 2026) challenging an order dated 30‑09‑2023 passed by respondent No. 4. The petition was opposed by the learned Standing Counsel who raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of filing an appeal. The High …

DR ASHWANI KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 15982 of 2026) challenging the order dated 31 May 2026 that transferred him from his posting in Shamli to Kasganj. The petitioner alleged that the transfer order was illegal and sought relief from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. …

YOGESHWAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yogeshwar Chaudhary, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to calculate and release his admissible arrears from a financial upgradation order dated 19.10.2024, to pay salary for earned leave from 01.03.2025 to 23.03.2025, and to consider his representation …

YOGENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yogendra Kumar, a sweeper in the Panchayati Raj Department, filed a writ petition challenging a suspension order dated 5 August 2026 issued by the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Aligarh. He sought certiorari to quash the order and mandamus to restrain the respondents from interfering …

DHARAMVEER SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharamveer Singh, challenged a Government Order dated 30.07.2021 that excluded candidates with locomotor disability from eligibility for the post of Lekhpal, arguing that his candidature was rejected on that ground. He contended that a subsequent Government Order dated 30.09.2024 had …

DR. LOKESH KULSHRESTHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Lokesh Kulshrestha, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court considered the request and, applying the procedural rules governing withdrawal of petitions, allowed …

HANS RAJ SINGH JYANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, father of the deceased Constable Aditya Jayant, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to release post‑death service benefits to him as the recorded nominee and to decide two pending applications dated 29‑06‑2026 and 14‑09‑2026. He alleged that the benefits were …

SMT. JEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Jeera Devi filed a writ petition after her husband, Sugai Ram, a retired Consolidation Lekhpal, died on 26-11-2019. She had submitted three applications (5-3-2021, 29-4-2022, 13-8-2025) to the Settlement Officer, Gorakhpur, seeking release of his family pension, but no decision was rendered. …

RAVIKANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravikant, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted the prayer and dismissed the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive facts or legal issues were …

SMT. GEETA CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Geeta Chaurasiya filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a transfer order dated 11‑09‑2026 and a mandamus directing the respondent not to disturb her service and to pay her salary. The petitioner contended that she had already filed a representation on 12‑09‑2026 before the …

ANOOP KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anoop Kumar Dwivedi, filed a writ petition challenging a government order dated 14 September 2026 that transferred him from Etah to Aligarh. He argued that, under the transfer policy, a husband and wife both serving in government positions should be accommodated at the same station, …

SANT RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sant Ram filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Secretary, Irrigation and Water Resource Department, U.P., to decide his appeal dated 11‑03‑2024 within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that his appeal was pending and required expeditious disposal. The State, through …

NITESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nitesh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and another respondent to take a final decision on an inquiry report dated 03-02-2026 and to reinstate him with all service benefits. The petitioner alleged that the disciplinary authority had not acted on …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Virendra Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 31‑05‑2026 and a relieving order dated 03‑09‑2026 issued by the State respondents. The petitioner relied on the Court’s earlier decision in Shashi Prakash Tripathi v. State of U.P. (Writ A No. 4494 of 2026) …

DIGAMBER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Digamber Singh, was charged under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and faced both criminal prosecution and disciplinary proceedings. He filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent proceedings, alleging prejudice. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Bharar Lal …

SUDHIR KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Yadav, a contractual employee since 2018, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order treating him as an outsourced employee and a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay his honorarium directly. He previously obtained a protective order in Writ A No. 3493 of …

RAFI AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rafi Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a directive for the payment of one increment, relying on a representation he submitted on 12 September 2026. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the matter should be decided on its merits, while the standing counsel for the respondents …

RAJNEESH KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Rajneesh Kumar Singh, a railway employee, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 27‑01‑2026 and 17‑09‑2026 passed by respondent No. 3. The Union of India raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The …

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Santosh Kumar Gupta filed Writ Petition No. 15741 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the Union of India and others. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner, through counsel Kedar Nath Kumar and Vishnu Kesarwani, sought to withdraw the petition. The …

FARZANA BEGUMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Farzana Begum filed a writ petition seeking extraordinary pension, retiral dues and terminal benefits of her husband who died on 17 January 2002. She had already submitted a representation to the respondent authority, the State of Uttar Pradesh, for the same relief. The learned Standing …

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shailendra Kumar Saxena, a Senior Assistant, filed a writ petition seeking his promotion to Chief Assistant and a mandamus directing the Director (Administration), Medical and Health, Uttar Pradesh to consider his application dated 5 September 2026 within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged …

JAIRAM PAL AND 18 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners, who are Sub Inspectors in the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking an additional increment after completing 19 years of service, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The petition referenced earlier …

MOHD. SALEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd. Saleem Khan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to grant him a Grade Pay of Rs.4600 (Level‑7) and the annual promotional pay scale, alleging that his seniority was ignored in favor of juniors. He also requested that Respondent No.3 decide his pending …

MOHAMMAD TAFAZZAL BEGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Tafazzal Beg, filed a writ petition seeking transfer of his posting from the Agra district to the Lucknow zone. He had already submitted a representation to the concerned authority for the same relief. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh, through its standing counsel, …

PRIYANK TIWARI @ PRIYANK KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a contractual medical officer, challenged an order dated 10 September 2026 that transferred him from Community Health Centre, Jakhaura to Community Health Centre, Madawara in Lalitpur district. He contended that the terms of his contract and two government circulars (dated 22 August …

PRITI CHAUDHARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged Advertisement No. 11-Exam/2024 for the post of Health Worker (Female), alleging that only 435 of the 4,892 vacancies were earmarked for Scheduled Caste (SC) candidates, amounting to 8.8% instead of the statutorily mandated 21% reservation. They sought certiorari to quash …

VIRENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former police constable dismissed in 1993, obtained a reversal of his termination from the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal in 2000, which directed that he be reinstated and granted all consequential benefits. The Tribunal's order was affirmed by the High Court in 2017, …

BIRENDRA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Birendra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to treat his service as continuous from 11 September 1987, granting him seniority, pay fixation, promotion, pension and related benefits, and to decide a representation dated 9 …

FAZAL IMAM NAQVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Fazal Imam Naqvi, a judicial officer, filed a writ petition challenging two charge sheets issued in a disciplinary enquiry, alleging they violated the U.P. District Court Service Rules, 2013. He sought certiorari to quash the charge sheets, mandamus directing the authorities to consider his …

TARAWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to regularize her deceased husband's post as an Attendant/Ardali and to pay salary and benefits to his family. The respondents contended that the petitioner had not first approached the concerned …

SUKHRAM YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners, Sub-Inspectors in the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking an additional pay increment after completing 19 years of service, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The petitioners argued that the legal position …

SMT NIDHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Nidhi, applied for a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 after her father's death on 24‑04‑2025. She filed a representation on 06‑07‑2026, which remained pending without decision. The …

ANJANI KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anjani Kumar Srivastava, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to remove an alleged miscellaneous advance of Rs.13,60,140, issue a No Dues Certificate, and direct the Chief Engineer, Tubewell, Varanasi to decide a representation filed on 28‑12‑2025. The …

MAHTAB ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Mahtab Alam challenged his dismissal from the Uttar Pradesh Police by filing a departmental appeal under Rule 20 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. The appeal, filed on 23 February 2026, remained pending before the Deputy Inspector …

ROSHAN PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a widow, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to consider her claim for a compassionate appointment under the Dying‑in‑Harness Rule, 1974, to the post of District Minority Welfare Officer, Jalaun, following her husband's death on 16‑02‑2024. The petitioner had …

BRIJ KISHOR KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Brij Kishor Kushwaha filed a writ petition seeking post‑retiral benefits, having already submitted a representation to the respondent authority. The respondent’s standing counsel argued that the pending representation rendered the writ petition unnecessary. The Court agreed, noting that …

GAUTAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gautam Singh, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash the rejection order and result notification that excluded his roll number from the list of qualified candidates for the post of Enforcement Constable, and also sought mandamus for the production of raw CCTV footage and …

ARUN KUMAR PREMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Premi, filed a writ petition seeking mandatory orders for his promotion to Administrative Officer (due since 09-10-2019) and Senior Administrative Officer (due on 29-01-2026) along with all related service benefits. He also requested the court to direct the respondents to …

MAISAR JAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Maisar Jaha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and another respondent to release a family pension. The petitioner had already submitted a representation on 22 June 2026 to the second respondent regarding the same grievance. The court noted that …

SUSHILA MAURYAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sushila Maurya, filed a writ petition seeking that the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission treat her as a qualified candidate for the post of Health Worker (Mahila) by awarding 15 marks for her contractual service, despite a wrong roll number on her experience …

CHANDRA KISOR SINGH AND 82 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 83 employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant them an additional increment/selection grade after completing 19 years of service, pending a representation they had filed. The petitioners argued that the representation …

SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents to grant him the third promotional pay scale/grade pay of Rs.4600 and the benefits and arrears of the 7th Pay Commission after completing 26 years of service. …

SATYAM SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyam Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Divisional Manager, Railway, which rejected his claim for a compassionate appointment. The petitioner argued that the rejection was arbitrary and sought judicial intervention. The Union of India contended that the …

SMT PINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Pinki Devi filed a writ petition challenging a 19 September 2025 order of the District Development Officer, Basti, which reverted her basic pay scale. The petitioner sought to add the Chief Development Officer as respondent No. 6, alleging that an appeal against the order was already pending …

DINESH KUMAR AND 24 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners, a group of 25 government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant them a Grade Pay of Rs. 4600 and revised pay scale benefits as per the 7th Pay Commission, including arrears and interest. They argued that their 16 years of …

KIRAN LATAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kiran Lata, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved an application seeking to withdraw the petition while requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court examined the petitioner's request and, invoking its inherent powers, allowed the …

MANISH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Manish Rajbhar filed a writ petition challenging disciplinary and criminal proceedings instituted against him under Sections 7, 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that the concurrent proceedings violated his rights and sought relief from the High …

ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND 14 OTHERS5versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Director of the Printing and Stationery Department, U.P. Government Press, to decide their representation dated 07-08-2026 and to grant them pay scale and service benefits akin to similarly situated candidates. The petitioners …

SATISH CHANDRA TIWARIversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satish Chandra Tiwari, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and later moved an application to withdraw the petition. The court entertained the withdrawal request, allowed the prayer, and consequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …

DR. VIMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Vimal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking an interim mandamus directing the State to release his salary and Special ACP benefits payable after 17 and 24 years of service, along with interest. He had also submitted a representation/application for the same relief, which was …

MANOJ KUMAR AND 35 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners, who are constables with 19 years of service, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking an additional increment of pay, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The petitioners argued that the legal position affirmed in those judgments …

SUDHIR KUMAR DUBEY AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sudhir Kumar Dubey and 13 others, filed Writ‑A No. 15492 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition was found to be deficient because it was not pressed with the specific details required for a writ …

KAPIL DEV SINGH AND 14 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they prayed for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the petitioners made this prayer before the court. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition as …

SUBHAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhawati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and two other respondents to allot and regularise a staff quarter in Kanpur, to decide her pending representations dated 15‑1‑2015, 15‑12‑2021 and 18‑9‑2025, and to restrain dispossession from the said …

ANAND PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Anand Prakash filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and another respondent to regularize staff quarter No. 4/5, Shashtri Nagar, in his favour, invoking several government orders and prior decisions, and also to order the respondents to decide his representations dated …

DHARMENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking payment of his salary from 8 May 2020 to 10 July 2022 and full salary during his suspension, along with other benefits. He had earlier filed a representation before the respondent authority on 19 January 2026. The respondent’s …

AYUSH KUMAR TOMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ayush Kumar Tomar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved an application for withdrawal of the petition. The court entertained the application and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive …

NAND KISHOR SHARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a police personnel, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider his entitlement to financial/pay upgradation under Government Orders dated 05.11.2014 and 03.03.2015 after a full review of his service records. He also requested that the …

UDHAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Udham Singh, a Gram Vikas Adhikari, filed a writ petition seeking protection and fixation of his pay. He had already submitted a representation to the second respondent on 11 September 2026 regarding the same matter. The standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the …

SURYAMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a decision on his representation dated 24‑08‑2026 for payment of pension and other post‑retiral dues. The respondent's standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the representation had already been made and should be dealt with by the …

RAKESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Rakesh Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 13 July 2026 passed by Respondent No.4, a mandamus to stay that order, and a mandamus directing Respondent No.4 to decide the petitioner's application dated 17 July 2026. …

SHYAM NARAYAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shyam Narayan Yadav filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a relieving order and a transfer order issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh, alleging that he was not relieved within ten days of the transfer. The petitioner contended that the delay rendered the orders illegal and …

SMT. SHALINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Shalini, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to consider her representations dated 28‑02‑2025 and 16‑05‑2025 and to appoint her to a suitable post under the Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, as well as to release all …

SURESH KUMAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide their application dated 22 May 2026 and to grant a 10% annual honorarium increment for the period 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2024. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition was no longer necessary …

VINOD KUMAR TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vinod Kumar Tiwari and another, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the DGP (Fire) and the Commissioner to submit recommendations and prepare citations for gallantry awards as per Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines. The petitioners had already made a representation on …

NISHA BHARTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Health Department to consider their claim for six‑month pre‑promotion training, include them in the list of eligible health workers for a January 2026 training, publish a seniority list of women health workers in Azamgarh, and act on their …

KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Krishna Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a decision on his representation dated 13 February 2026 for payment of honorarium. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, through standing counsel, contended that the petition served no useful purpose since the representation had already …

RAM MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Mohan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Aditya Narayan Shukla and Rakesh Narain Shukla, moved that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court considered whether the petition was sufficiently pressed to warrant …

SMT. PRIYANKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authorities to deduct Rs.8,000 per month from a respondent's salary and credit it to the petitioners, to enforce a maintenance order passed by a Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The …

CHATURI RAM GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Chaturi Ram Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to sanction his retirement pension and other benefits, including service rendered in a work‑charge establishment, and to act on his representation dated 07‑07‑2026 in line with Supreme Court …

RAM PRAKASH BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Veterinary Officer, challenged a transfer order dated 28‑06‑2024 and a subsequent relieving order dated 29‑05‑2026 issued by the Director of Animal Husbandry, arguing that the delay of nearly two years made the relief inappropriate. The petitioner sought quashing of the relieving …

ANKURAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ankuram Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 12-12-2024 issued by the Director (Ayurvedic Service) of Uttar Pradesh, which withheld two annual increments of his salary. The petitioner alleged that the order was illegal and sought …

VIPIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash Advertisement No.17-Examination/2026 for the post of Pashudhan Prasar Adhikari and a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant them provisional permission to apply online and appear for the main examination. The High Court noted that the …

DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking arrears of medical leave for 91 days covering 2 June 2015 to 31 August 2015. He had already submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 on 24 November 2025 regarding the same claim. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition …

SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sushil Kumar Sharma, a Lab Assistant, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to pay his service and pension benefits based on a pay grade of Rs. 4,600 approved on 22 September 2014 after completing 10, 14 and 26 years of service. He also sought …

REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.5 to consider and decide two representations dated 24 November 2025 and 3 December 2025, and to award medical, death benefits, gratuity, PPF and other allowances of a deceased employee. The Standing Counsel argued that …

SHABANA BEGUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shabana Begum, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide her claim for a family pension under a government order dated 03.12.2012. She had already submitted a representation on 16.06.2021 to respondent No.4, which remained pending. The …

VIMLESH DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vimlesh Devi, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the petitioner, Bhole Ram, prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court considered the prayer and found no merit in proceeding with the petition. Accordingly, the …

KUMAR PRASANT SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Kumar Prasant Srivastava applied for a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 after his father's death on 19‑02‑2026. He filed a representation on 13‑04‑2026, which remained pending. The petitioner …

SATISH KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Gram Vikas Adhikari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to resume his duties and to pay his full salary and arrears, relying on an inquiry report dated 16 June 2026 that exonerated him. The respondent argued that departmental disciplinary proceedings were …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Virendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh authorities to promote him to Sub Inspector for a 2025 promotion and to Head Constable with effect from 2016, along with consequential benefits. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to file a fresh, …

SOURABH JURELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sourabh Jurel, claimed a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, after his father died on 6 December 2022. He filed a representation with the respondent authority on 2 December 2025, which …

RAJESH PAL AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged Advertisement No.17‑Pariksha/2026 for the post of Pashudhan Prasar Adhikari Mukhya Pariksha dated 10 August 2026, issued by the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission. They argued that because several writ petitions concerning the 2014 selection were still …

ANJALI VARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Anjali Varma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the recruitment authority to amend her category from General to OBC in an online application for the post of Health Worker (Female), alleging a clerical mistake. She submitted a representation dated 26.08.2026 …

NEMPAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nempal Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider and determine their entitlement to financial/pay upgradation under Government Orders dated 05‑11‑2014 and 03‑03‑2015, after examining their complete service records. …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to consider his entitlement to financial/pay upgradation under Government Orders dated 05.11.2014 and 03.03.2015 after a full review of his service record. He also asked …

DEEPANSHIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepanshi, challenged Advertisement No. 11-Exam/2024 for the post of Swasthya Karyakarta (Mahila), alleging that only 435 out of 4,892 vacancies were reserved for Scheduled Castes, far below the statutory 21% reservation. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the …

RAVI RANJAN KUMAR AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of junior assistants, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to prepare a correct seniority list in accordance with a prior judgment dated 2 August 2019 (Service Single No.15692 of 2018) and to consider a series of …

KRISHNANAND UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnanand Upadhyay, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents to compute his combined military and civil service tenure and fix his pay and seniority as per Government Orders dated 26‑08‑1977 and 26‑03‑1980 and Civil …

PRIYA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Priya Singh challenged the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against her while a criminal case under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was pending. She argued that the simultaneous proceedings would prejudice her rights and sought relief through a writ …

PRITI DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a seven‑month‑pregnant applicant for the post of Home Guard (Female), had cleared the written exam but was scheduled for the Physical Efficiency Test (PET) on 22‑09‑2026. She applied to the recruitment authority for a deferment, citing her pregnancy and medical documents, but the …

HARIKESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Harikesh Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the civil miscellaneous proceedings, the petitioner filed an application seeking withdrawal of the petition. The court examined the application and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. …

SMT. RAMWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Ramwati filed a writ petition seeking her retiral dues and consequential benefits. She had earlier submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 on 2 April 2026 requesting the same relief. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition served no useful purpose since the representation …

GOPAL JEE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Gopal Jee and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, they moved the Court seeking to withdraw the petition while being granted liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court entertained this application and allowed the withdrawal. …

SATENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged a punishment order that placed him at the minimum pay scale for one year and sought direction for the respondents to grant increments now that the year had elapsed. He had already submitted a representation to Respondent No. 4 regarding this grievance. The petitioner’s …

ANGOORI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Angoori Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment for her daughter in a government position. The Court examined whether such a petition is maintainable under the writ jurisdiction. It held that the petition was not maintainable as it did not fall within the …

VEENA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Veena Singh filed a writ petition seeking her transfer from the District Commissionerate of Kanpur Nagar to the District Jhansi Range. She had earlier submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 on 7 September 2026 requesting the same transfer. The Standing Counsel for the respondents …

SHRIRAMversusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL PRANITYA RAKSHAK DAL AND 4 OTHER

The petitioner, Shriram, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Director General of Prantiya Rakshak Dal and other respondents to appoint him as a Guard in the Ghazipur unit and to release his salary regularly. He also requested a reasoned order on his representation dated …

DR. ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dr. Anil Kumar challenged a suspension order dated 21 July 2026 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary of the Uttar Pradesh Animal Husbandry Department, alleging it was based on a complaint filed by an MLA on 21 May 2026. The petitioner argued that the MLA had withdrawn the complaint before the …

SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Shukla, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing CRPF officials to process his voluntary retirement application under Rule 43(d)(1) of the CRPF Rules, 1955, without requiring NPS option forms, and to release his pension and other benefits under the Old Pension …

SHRAWAN KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent to compute and pay his pension, final pension, gratuity, arrears and other retirement dues with interest, and also to consider a representation dated 23/07/2026. The petitioner’s counsel …

SANJAY RAGHAVversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Raghav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking reinstatement in his government service. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, opposed the relief. The learned Standing Counsel submitted instructions indicating that the petitioner …

SMT. KIRAN DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Kiran Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to regularize her appointment as a Staff Nurse and to compel the Chief Medical Officer of District Chitrakoot to decide her pending representation dated 25-07-2026 within a fixed period. The …

SMT. PRATIMA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Pratima Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to regularize their appointment as Staff Nurses and to compel the Chief Medical Officer of District Chandauli to decide their pending representations …

SUNITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Chief Medical Officer of District Chandauli to regularize her appointment as a Staff Nurse and to decide her pending representation dated 23-07-2026 within a fixed period. The petitioner …

DIVYANSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Divyansh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to grant him a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, and to compel the District Magistrate of Hamirpur to consider his pending application within a reasonable time. …

RAJ KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Police Inspector, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State to consider his promotion to Deputy Superintendent in accordance with service rules, to examine his seniority vis‑à‑vis a junior who had already been promoted, to produce relevant seniority and assessment …

KM NIMISHA SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Nimisha Saxena filed a writ petition seeking a transfer on compassionate grounds from the District Employment Office in Etawah to that in Agra. The petitioner had already submitted a representation dated 13 May 2026 for the same relief. The standing counsel argued that the petition was …

SHIVANG TIWARIversusUNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Shivang Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking its dismissal on the ground that it was not pressed, and requested liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The court examined the prayer and found it to be in order. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition as not …

AJIT KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ajit Kumar challenged the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against him while a criminal case was also filed under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Police Act. He argued that the concurrent proceedings would prejudice his rights and sought relief …

INDRAJEET KUMAR GONDversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Indrajeet Kumar Gond, challenged disciplinary proceedings and a criminal case filed against him under sections of the B.N.S. Act and the Arms Act. He argued that the simultaneous proceedings violated principles of natural justice. The High Court, relying on its earlier decision in …

NARESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 13 June 2026 that moved him to Varanasi and seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to accommodate him at a nearby RPF post in New Delhi. He also submitted a representation on 27 July 2026 requesting …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Virendra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an administrative transfer order dated 31 May 2026 and a mandamus directing the respondent authority to decide pending representations filed on 5 June, 27 August, 31 August, and 8 September 2026. The petitioner …

SATYENDRA KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar Shukla, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the competent authority to consider and decide his transfer request from Kanpur Dehat to Fatehpur, invoking the Transfer Policy 2026-27 and his long service and family circumstances. He requested that the …

AKHILESH KUMAR PATHAK AND 53 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking direction for the State to grant them a promotional pay scale of Rs.4200, including training period calculations, and the benefits and arrears of the 7th Pay Commission. They relied on several Government Orders dated between 2012 and …

SUJATA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sujata Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to pay family pension, gratuity, assured career progression benefits, Rashkaran, and leave encashment. The petitioner had already submitted a representation on 13-04-2026 to the third respondent, …

RASTRIYA SANRACHNA SEVA SANSTHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rastriya Sanrachna Seva Sansthan, filed Writ Petition No. 14265 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Vikesh Kumar Tiwari, moved the Court for withdrawal of the petition. The Court examined the request and found no objection to the …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 14236 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Shri Shiv Raj Singh, moved the Court seeking withdrawal of the …

SAHAB SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sahab Singh Yadav, was transferred from Prayagraj to Etawah and sought to retain the government‑allotted house because his daughter is studying in Class IX. He relied on a DG Police letter dated 21 November 2016 allowing retention of accommodation when a child is in Class IX or XI, …

ARCHNAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Archna, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition …

SMT. SARITA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Sarita Devi, a former railway employee, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a revision of her pension to an extraordinary family pension (category C) at 60% of basic pay under the Railway Service (Extraordinary) Pension Rules, 1993, and challenging a rejection order dated …

BIRENDRA KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Birendra Kumar Gautam, filed a writ petition challenging a departmental suspension order dated 18 July 2026 issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The High Court examined the suspension order and found no infirmity in it. Consequently, the Court declined to interfere with …

PHOOL CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Phool Chandra filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a revision filed under Rule‑23 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. The petitioner argued that the revision was pending and required …

KRISHANPAL SINGH AND 47 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners, serving as Sub Inspectors and Head Constables in the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking an additional increment after completing 19 years of service, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The Court noted that …

JITENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14457 of 2026) challenging the order of suspension dated 17 August 2026 issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition sought to set aside the suspension on the ground that it was illegal. The learned Judge perused the impugned …

SHRI SHYAM SUNDERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Shri Shyam Sunder filed Writ‑A No.14481 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that a representation dated 15 September 2025, which formed the basis of the petition, had already been decided by the …

BABITA SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Babita Srivastava, a stenographer in the Public Works Department, Prayagraj, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to regularize her service and grant benefits under the old pension scheme, as well as to decide her representation dated 17‑08‑2026. The petition …

RAMANUJ PANDEYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramanuj Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission's order rejecting his candidature for the post of Regional Inspector (Technical) and a mandamus directing the commission to allow him to sit for the practical examination. …

VED PRAKASH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to transfer him from Bijnor to any of the districts of Ghaziabad, Hapur, Meerut or Gautam Buddha Nagar. He had submitted a representation for transfer which was pending consideration. The …

MAHESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Mahesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to transfer him from Pilibhit district to Lakhimpur Kheri district in accordance with the applicable Transfer Policy and to decide his pending representation dated 06.05.2026 within a stipulated period. The …

HARIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Haripal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered the prayer and found no merit in proceeding further. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the …

WAJID ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to accept his option to be placed under the old pension scheme and to decide his representation regarding that option. The petitioner had already submitted a representation which was pending. The State argued that the …

SMT. DEVKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Devki Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to release the post-retirement dues and family pension of her deceased husband, Jeevan Chandra Arya, pursuant to a letter dated 17‑09‑2025 issued by Respondent No.2. The petitioner alleged that despite the …

MANOJ KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar, a Sub‑Inspector, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh authorities to open the seal‑cover envelope and promote him to Inspector under Government Orders dated 28‑05‑1997 and 09‑01‑2018. The petitioner argued that similarly placed officers had been promoted …

PARDESHI RAMversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Pardeshi Ram, a retired employee, filed a writ petition seeking payment of his gratuity, commutation of pension and full regular pension from 1 July 2017, alleging that these dues were withheld because a criminal case against him was pending. He had only received interim pension and had …

ROHIT DHANKEDversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rohit Dhanked filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 30‑09‑2025 passed by Respondent No.4. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and asked the High Court to set it aside. The State of Uttar Pradesh, as respondent, raised a preliminary objection …

DEVATA NAND SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Indian Army serviceman now employed with the Uttar Pradesh Police Development Department, filed a writ petition seeking three orders of mandamus: (i) to have his earlier army service counted towards his present police service, (ii) to have his salary fixed as if he had been …

SUNIL KUMAR YADAVversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sunil Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to promote him to Deputy Commissioner, Handloom and Textiles (effective 17‑05‑2018) and to Joint Commissioner, Industries (Handloom) (effective 11‑08‑2025), alleging that a junior colleague had been …

KHUSHABOOversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Khushaboo, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No. 3 to act on his representation dated 18‑08‑2026 concerning a merit list based on his qualifications and income certificate. The petitioner alleged that the representation remained pending. The State’s …

RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLAversusDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION U.P.AT ALLAHABAD AND 2 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Rakesh Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition (No. 1476 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging the Director of Education, U.P., and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the …

RAM DAYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 27 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Dayal, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Gaon Sabha subsequently filed a restoration application against that order, which was stayed. The learned Standing Counsel informed the court of these developments. The …

RAM MANOHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 21 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Manohar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Prayagraj district to decide a stay application pending in Revision No. 682/2026 (also referred to as Revision No. 628/2026). The petitioners alleged that …

GEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Upziladhikari/Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Lalganj, Mirzapur, to decide an appeal (No. T202516530205562 2025) pending under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the appeal …

JABITA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Jabita Khatoon filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the lower court to expedite the pending case No. 5012/2025 (Jabita Khatoon v. Hareram) and a computerized case T202505440205012 before the Tahsildar Hata, Kushinagar. The petitioner alleged that the case has been pending …

VISHNU DATT TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Vishnu Datt Tiwari filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate of Prayagraj to decide a land revenue case (Case No. RST/6928 of 2021) that had been pending since 2021 under section 30 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code‑2006. The …

ANAND KUMAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anand Kumar Saini, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18‑09‑2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code‑2006. The order concerned a revenue case (Case No. 11404 of 2025). The State’s Standing …

RAJARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to trace and decide a pending restoration application (No. 38 of 2021) filed against an order dated 31‑10‑2019. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the restoration application remained …

NANHI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Nanhi Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Tilhar Tehsil to decide a pending mutation case (No. 8190 of 2024) that had been delayed despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious …

PRATEEK PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Prateek Pandey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue authority, to register and decide a pending case under sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, dated 14 January 2026. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates …

MOHAMMAD RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Rashid filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari of Sagadi, District Azamgarh (Respondent No.3) to decide case No. 8429/2026 (Shivanand et al. v. Imtiyaz et al.) pending under section 38(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The …

SUDHIR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sudhir Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate, Meerut, to decide a recall application dated 22 September 2025. The petitioner argued that the application had been pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The Court, …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj, to decide Appeal No. 2484 of 2024 (Bahadur Ram Bahadur v. Moti Lal & others) pending under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the appeal …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHER

Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) IInd Agra Division to decide Appeal No. 218 of 2026, filed under section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, on the ground that the appeal was pending with several dates fixed but no decision …

PRABHAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 22 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking compliance of an injunction order issued by a trial court under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the order had not been implemented. The respondent's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that such orders are …

DATA PRASAD PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Data Prasad Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to be deficient in particulars. The court considered whether the petition could be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal. It held that the petitioner could be allowed to file a fresh …

YASHODA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yashoda Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Naib-Tehsildar in a revenue case and also sought a mandamus directing the respondents not to disturb her peaceful possession. The respondents raised a …

SMT. SIYA DULARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Siya Dulari filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel R.B. Singh, sought relief but did not press the petition at the hearing. The respondents, represented by C.S.C. and Hari …

RAJNEESH RANJANversusBANKEBIHARI AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajneesh Ranjan filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Koraon, Prayagraj, to decide a pending partition suit under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner relied on Sub‑Rule (10) of Rule …

SMT. KALYANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Kalyani Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, to decide a restoration application filed on 17‑07‑2023 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that …

TULSIRAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners, Tulsiram and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the third respondent to decide a pending civil case (No. 11113 of 2024, Sita Ram & Others vs Nagar Panchayat Harraiya & Others) under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to maintain a status‑quo on a …

VIVEKANAND AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, to decide a stay application dated 04-04-2026 filed in Revision No. C 202602000000593 under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. They contended that the stay application had been …

MAHESH CHANDR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28-10-2024 passed by the Collector of Firozabad under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which stayed proceedings for cancellation of a lease granted to them. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the order, a writ of …

SHRI VIJAY PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order that directed the institution of a case under Section 38 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents argued that the petitioner had already appeared before the concerned authority and lodged objections. The High Court held that a …

SMT. SIMIRITI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Simiriti Devi, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 June 2019 issued by the Tehsildar of Sadar, Gorakhpur, in mutation proceedings. The petition sought judicial interference with the Tehsildar's order. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, raised …

NAQSAB ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Naqsab Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, moved the court for withdrawal of the writ petition. The court considered the request and, …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Raju filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to cancel a fisheries lease on public utility land (Pokhari) of Araji No.780 (0.5260 hectare) and to restrain any interference by respondents. The respondents, through standing counsel, raised a …

MAHESH KUMAR @ RINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and mandamus directing the District Magistrate to conduct a fresh spot inspection and demarcation of his land. The court noted that the petitioner’s grievance pertains to land …

GIRJASHANKAR PAL @ GIRAJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners Girjashankar Pal and another filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a revenue inspector's report and mandamus orders to prevent blockage of a historic pathway and to compel a decision on an application. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative …

SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to enforce an order dated 16‑10‑2021 passed by the Tehsildar (Judicial) in a revenue suit under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. He claimed to be an inhabitant of the village concerned and asked the Court to compel …

GYANESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gyaneshwar Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment and order dated 18‑12‑2025 passed by respondent No.2 under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy – an …

DHARMVIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmvir, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06‑09‑2025 that constituted a revenue team to proceed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning a 0.047‑hectare land (Gata No. 988). The petitioner argued that the revenue proceedings were pending and sought …

AMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Amar Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that the land demarcation was carried out without his presence and that the inspection report was not provided to him. The High Court had earlier directed the State's standing …

GUDDI DEVI URF SHAKEELAversusCOMMISSIONER PRAYAGRAJ MANDAL AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Guddi Devi (Shakeela) filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Commissioner of Prayagraj Mandal to hear and decide a pending appeal (appeal No. 1138/2024) that has been delayed since 2024. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had been fixed but the appeal remained …

SUDARSHAN LAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sudarshan Lal Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 20 January 2026 passed by the respondent under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in the case Gaon Sabha vs. Sudarshan Lal. The order had been issued in a …

VANDANA SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 9 OTHERS

Vandana Singh filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 76 of 2026) seeking to set aside an order dated 24 March 2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant contended that there were sufficient grounds for a review of that order. The respondent State of UP and …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Badalapur, Jaunpur to decide a stay application filed on 21‑08‑2025 in a declaratory suit under section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The stay application had remained pending despite several …

SHESHNATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sheshnath Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Deoria to decide a restoration application filed in 2022 under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the Tehsildar had not …

RAMRATANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide appeal No. 441/2023 (Ravikant Pathak v. Subash) pending under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since April 2023. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, …

ANITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Anita Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Chandauli to decide her restoration suit (RST/2999 of 2025) filed under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the application had been pending since 2025 despite several …

RAM SAJEEVANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Sajeevan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Chayal, to implement a prior directive dated 18‑02‑2025 and to conclude pending proceedings under Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …

K.P. SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to execute an eviction order dated 18‑06‑2024 passed by the Tehsildar under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been confirmed by the Collector. The petitioners alleged that the order had not been …

BABULALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babulal, challenged the initiation of a revenue case (Case No. 5206 of 2025) against him before the Tehsildar of Mahawan, alleging that the proceeding was instituted under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 without jurisdiction and was non‑maintainable. He sought a writ of …

VNBP SHIKSHA SEVA SAMITIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, VNBP Shiksha Seva Samiti, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to decide a pending mutation case (Case No. 3881 of 2024) concerning land in Gorakhpur. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the …