Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
410 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The petitioner, Smt. Meera Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide Execution Case No. 46 of 2025, which had been pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious …
The petitioner, Ravi Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking an interim mandamus directing the State respondents to demolish an alleged illegal encroachment of about 7 Bigha 6 Biswa by respondent no.6, invoking Sections 67(2) and 67(6) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State's standing …
The petitioners Rakesh Kumar Pandey and another filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 22‑04‑2026 and a revenue inspector's report dated 18‑03‑2026. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contested the petition, and the standing counsel raised a preliminary …
Petitioners Mahendra Kumar Chaudhari and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 10‑04‑2026 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Phoolpur, Prayagraj. The State of U.P. and other respondents opposed the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for …
The petitioner, Naresh Bal Bhatnagar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, the Revenue Officer, to decide a pending case (Case No. 10507 of 2021) filed under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26‑10‑2023 passed by respondent No.3 under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy – an appeal under …
The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar Sonkar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to consider and issue a fishery lease (Machhli Palan Patta) for a specific plot of land in Kaushambi district. The petitioner claimed he was the highest bidder for …
Petitioner Ramashrey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents, including a private individual (respondent No.5). The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petition was not maintainable …
Petitioner Prabhunath Prasad filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to call records of two cases and decide them based on an earlier decree and a consolidation order. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Rule …
The petitioners Ompal and seven others filed a writ petition challenging two orders that removed their names from the khatauni of a property: one dated 29‑08‑2025 by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) and another dated 28‑07‑2023 by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under section 38(2) of the …
Petitioner Anil Singh and others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent, a court, to decide suit No. 696 of 2025 pending since 2025. The petitioners alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the suit remained undecided and requested expeditious disposal. The High …
The petitioner, Sandeep Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to remove an obstacle obstructing his access to agricultural land, invoking Section 25 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2026 and paragraph 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. He alleged that an order dated …
The petitioner, Mohit, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 16374 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel moved that the petition be dismissed as not …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to hand over possession of three parcels of land in Deoria district pursuant to a consolidation order dated 24‑04‑2025, and also to consider an application filed on 16‑02‑2026 within the period fixed by the court. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Judicial Mandal, Prayagraj, to decide a pending suit (No. 2468 of 2022) filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2022 …
The petitioner, Sameer Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to restore his possession of two land parcels (Gata No.306 and 308) in Naraura village, Kanpur Nagar. The petition alleged that the respondents had unlawfully …
Petitioner Kishan Kumar and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Commissioner, Aligarh Division. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and sought its setting aside. The respondent State of U.P. raised a …
The petitioner, Bachcheram @ Bachchelal Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a lower court, to decide Revision No. 4181/2025, which has been pending since 2025 despite several fixed dates. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested …
The petitioner, Smt. Gena Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.2) to decide a land restoration application filed in 2022 under Sections 34 and 209 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the …
The petitioner Rizwan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Case No. 1542 of 2024, which is pending under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The Court, …
Petitioner Parmanand and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional City Magistrate to decide a case (No. 240 of 1974) pending under Section 229-B of the Uttar Pradesh Zoning and Land Revenue Act. The petition alleged that despite multiple dates being fixed, the case …
Petitioner Parmanand and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional City Magistrate‑II to decide a case pending since 1974 under Section 229B of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act. The petitioners alleged that despite multiple dates being fixed, the case …
The petitioners, Deena Nath Mishra and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 26 July 2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) in Appeal No. 991 of 2024 (Mehilal v. Deenath) under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The petitioner, Smt. Durgawati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) of Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 4698/2025) under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2025. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Smt. Pooja Deol, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue officer, to decide Case No. 6708 of 2023 (Arnav Singh & others v. Waheed & others) under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 16383 of 2026) challenging a notice issued to him in proceedings under Section 128 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition sought relief on the ground that the notice was unlawful. The respondents, the State of …
The petitioner Jirawati filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate's order dated 10‑12‑2025 that dismissed a review petition filed by Mamta under section 209(Ja) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and to restrain the respondents from interfering with her possession of a …
The petitioner, Ram Gopal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj to decide appeal No. 1422 of 2024 (Laxmikant Dixit v. Rakesh Kumar) under Section 207 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2024 despite …
Petitioner Kailash filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur, to decide Appeal No. C 202505000001425 pending under Section 229 Kha of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been pending despite several dates being fixed, …
Petitioner Ramesh Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur, to decide Revision No. C 201905000001086, which had been pending despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious …
Petitioner Jitendra Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to decide Mutation Case No. 696 of 2022, which had remained pending since 2022 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the undue …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue officer, to decide a pending mutation case (case No. 6392 of 2022) arising under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Act, 2006. The petition alleged undue delay since 2022 despite several dates being fixed. …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Vishwakarma, filed a writ petition seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to compel Respondent No. 2, a revenue officer, to decide case No. 6235 of 2025 (Vishwakarma v. Vinda Devi) arising under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Act, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a pending civil case (Case No.RST1458/2024) arising under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case has been pending since 2024 despite multiple dates being fixed, causing …
The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a restoration application filed in 2022 under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006, and to restrain Respondent No.4 from interfering with peaceful possession of the disputed land. The …
Petitioner Sita Pati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a pending mutation case (No. 4672 of 2025) concerning land in Basti district, under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2025 and …
Bhola filed Writ Petition No. 17797 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, but counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition was not pressed at this stage. The Court examined whether the writ petition was …
Petitioner Birendra Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and four other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court considered the request and, without …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a court order dated 13 April 2026 that allowed a restoration application filed by the respondents. The petition sought to set aside that order. The respondents' standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners had an alternative …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the approval order dated 21-06-2023 that granted a fisheries lease to the respondents. The standing counsel for the State raised a preliminary objection that under Rule 59 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, an appeal against the order lies before …
Petitioner Jawahar Lal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, to decide a revenue case (Case No. 7232 of 2021) pending since 2021 under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the prolonged delay defeats the …
Petitioners Jiyana and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to decide a stay application filed in a regular suit concerning land under Section 144 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, and also sought a status‑quo order and protection against third‑party …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil‑Shahganj, to expedite the pending appeal (Case No.4424 of 2016) filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Act, 1901. The appeal had been pending since 2016 with multiple dates fixed but no decision …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer/Deputy Collector (respondent No.3) to decide a pending application dated 15‑04‑2026, to decide a restoration application of respondent No.12 dated 04‑04‑2026, and to restrain construction on certain land …
The petitioners, Hira Lal and another, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17592 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition sought relief, but the petitioners later moved an …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Sagdi, Azamgarh, to decide a recall application filed on 19‑07‑2002 in a land‑reform case under Section 229‑B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The petition argued that the …
The petitioners Mahaveer Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction under Section 117 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, for the Assistant Collector (Revenue) to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 2373 of 2025) that had been awaiting …
The petitioner, Karam Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 to decide a restoration application and related applications filed in 2016, which remain pending. The petition alleged that the case has been pending for several years without any decision. The Court …
The petitioner, Lalta Prasad Pandey, filed a writ petition challenging a revisional order dated 23 March 2026 that had been passed in a revision filed by the respondents. The respondents' standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner possessed an alternative statutory remedy by …
Petitioner Pramod Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a court, to decide a pending case (No. T201909550604155) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 2006, which has been delayed since 2019 despite multiple dates being fixed. The …
The petitioner, Shabbir Khan, filed Writ Petition No. 17779 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Chandra Prakash Kushwaha, subsequently moved the Court seeking withdrawal of the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain the State authorities from dispossessing them of a portion of Plot No. 59 (recorded as Harijan Abadi) which was being treated as part of Plot No. 58 (Chakroad) in Azamgarh. They also asked that the order dated 18‑01‑2023, passed …
The petitioner, Mohd Abbas, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. He later sought to withdraw the petition, stating that essential parties had not been impleaded. The petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh petition with the necessary parties. The court considered the …
The petitioner, Mulchandra, filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Mandal Chitrakootdham to expedite the disposal of case No. RST/7867/2025, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner …
Sai Deen filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2‑4 to remove an illegal encroachment of a house built by respondents No.6‑9 on Gata No.429, and to decide pending representations. The petitioner alleged that an order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 dated …
Petitioner Happu Kha filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17694 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner’s grievance was against private individuals (respondents 4 and 5) and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division to decide a pending appeal (Case No. 2409 of 2024) that has been delayed since 2024. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authority to consider and decide applications filed on 06.01.2022 and 24.06.2022 for implementing an order dated 16.11.2021 passed under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Suresh Chandra, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17780 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was argued before the Court by counsel Mahipal Singh and Somveer on behalf of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to summon a 1974-75 patta allotment record for Village Umari and to restrain respondents Nos. 4 to 7 from illegal construction on his land (Gata No. 2337, 150 sq. yd.) in Auraiya. The petition essentially involved a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Officer, Second, Sadar, District Azamgarh to decide a pending case (No. 10509 of 2022) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained …
Petitioner Puspa Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was opposed by the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed at this stage. The …
Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondent No.3 to comply with an order dated 19‑03‑26. The petition arose out of a dispute with a private respondent. The State’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition was not maintainable because it …
The petitioner, Anil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 16/05/2025 passed by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the order was illegal and sought its setting aside. The …
The petitioner, Bhullan, filed Writ Petition No. 17720 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 16 May 2025 issued by the Tehsildar/Assistant Collector (2nd) (Judicial) of Tehsil Loni, District Ghaziabad, under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Babloo, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26-10-2023 passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The State, represented by its standing counsel, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy—specifically, filing a restoration application or …
The petitioner, Reena Devi, sought to operate a fishery lease that had originally been granted to another individual, Ram Hari, who never utilized it. She deposited the required amount after obtaining permission to do so, but her subsequent application to operate the lease was rejected on the ground …
The petitioners, Shiv Pujan and four others, filed a writ petition (Writ No. 17378 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Chandra Shekhar Singh, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any relief to be granted. The court considered …
The petitioner, Devraj Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that the petitioner's grievance was against private individuals and therefore not …
Petitioner Smt Sursatti Devi filed a writ petition in which, due to inadvertence, certain deceased persons were incorrectly impleaded as parties. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one with the correct parties. Respondent State of UP and others, through …
The petitioner Bhura challenged a 2012 order passed under Section 157-A of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950 that favored his father, who subsequently executed a sale deed of the land. The writ petition was filed in 2026, fourteen years after the order. The High Court held that …
The petitioner, Krishnawati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the respondent No.2 to decide pending proceedings under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which have been pending since 2020 despite a Lekhpal report filed in 2022. The petitioner argued that the delay was …
Petitioner Lavkush filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Mirzapur, to decide a pending case (No. 28093/2025) under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2025. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had …
The petitioner, Shyam Narain Chaubey, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03-10-2025 issued under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. and others raised a preliminary objection that the impugned order is appealable under Section 67(5) of the …
Dayaram Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the Lekhpal's demarcation reports (RC Form‑19 dated 08‑01‑2025 and RC Form‑20 dated 03‑07‑2025) and a dispossession order dated 17‑07‑2025, seeking certiorari and mandamus to prevent interference with his possession. The petitioner also raised that a …
The petitioner, Darshan Singh Sahni, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 09.04.2026 passed by respondent No.2 in Case No.14608 of 2025, which was issued under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 concerning land in Village Morta, Ghaziabad. The …
The petitioner, Krishan Kanhaiya, filed a writ petition under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the respondent (Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Hata) to decide a pending mutation case (No. 6825 of 2025) that had been delayed since 2025 despite several dates …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a restoration application filed on 27 November 2020, which had remained pending despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and requested an expeditious decision. …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Rajaura, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 20-11-2025 passed by a revenue officer under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the order was erroneous and sought its setting aside. The …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, filed a writ petition under certiorari challenging an order dated 20‑11‑2025 passed by a revenue officer under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner sought quashing of the order. The respondent’s standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that …
The petitioner, Rajnarayan Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel Respondent No.3 to remove encroachments by Respondents No.5‑14 on land Gata 319 in Madari village, and to enforce compliance with orders of the Assistant Collector dated 10‑Nov‑2022, 25‑Sep‑2025 and 26‑Dec‑2025 under …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the lower court (Tahsil Mounath Bhanj, District Mau) to decide a pending civil suit (Case No. 232 of 2026) that had been adjourned repeatedly. The petitioner argued that the suit was unduly delayed and requested the High Court to order its …
Pushpa Devi and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (Judicial) of Gola Tehsil to decide their pending case under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been awaiting disposal since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioners …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a mutation application (Case No. 303-392 of 2006, Sahid Ali v. Azeez Bano) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2006 despite several dates being fixed. The …
The petitioner, Urmila Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to comply with an interim order dated 23.02.2026 issued under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to remove an illegal tin-shed. The petitioner alleged that despite the trial court's order, the …
The petitioner, Sai Deen, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 to remove an illegal encroachment of a house built by respondents 6 to 10 on Gata No.429 in Village Tilausa, Banda district, and to decide pending representations dated 03.12.2025, 20.02.2026 and …
Petitioners Smt. Shanti Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to act against a private respondent and to consider a representation dated 15-04-2026, also requesting protection from harassment. The State's standing counsel objected, contending that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No. 2 to decide Appeal No. C202502000000209 (Diwakar Singh v. Ratnakar Singh) under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code‑2006, alleging undue delay despite multiple dates being fixed. The Court examined the petition and …
The petitioner Virendra filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 2 April 2026 that was issued under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. raised a preliminary objection that the impugned order is appealable under Section 67(5) of the same Code. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a judicial officer, to decide a pending civil suit (Case No. 934 of 2018, originally filed in 2010) that had remained undecided despite multiple dates being fixed. The petitioners argued that the prolonged …
The petitioner, Suryanath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending revenue case (RST/162/2023) under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition argued that the case had been pending since 2023 …
The petitioner, Mahendra Prasad Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authority to decide a pending mutation case (No.19215 of 2025) before the Tehsildar of Dumariyaganj. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case …
Petitioner Raj Narayan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Appeal No. C202415000001985 (Vijendra Vs. Up‑Ziladhikari) pending under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been pending since 2024 without any …
Ramji filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Jaunpur to re‑demarcate a 0.023‑hectare parcel of his land, alleging that although demarcation and boundary pillars had been installed, a dispute with private respondents required the proceedings to be …
The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a pending restoration application filed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and also sought a direction restraining Respondent No.4 from interfering with peaceful possession …
Petitioner Kamla Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tilhar to dispose of a pending mutation case (Case No. 14180 of 2025) under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged undue delay despite several dates being …
The petitioners, Ram Narayan Dwivedi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Gorakhpur Division to expedite the disposal of case No. 602 of 2025, which was pending under section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition …
The petitioner, Ram Adhar Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration‑III), Gorakhpur, to decide a pending land reform case (No. 572 of 2024) under Section 331(3) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The petitioner …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to consider their grievance and pass an order on an application dated 15‑07‑2025. The grievance arose out of a dispute with a private individual, Respondent No.4. The State’s Standing Counsel raised a preliminary …
The petitioner, Isthar Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tehsil Sadar, Maharajganj to decide a pending mutation case (No. 22703 of 2024) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The …
Petitioner Avdhesh Singh filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and private respondents. The State's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner's grievance was against private individuals, making the writ petition non-maintainable. The court examined …
The petitioner, Durg Vijay Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a pending Review Application No. 906/A filed in Appeal No. C201915000000960 under Section 38(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that despite several …
Petitioner Uma Shankar filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 31.03.2026 that directed him to remove constructions on disputed land and threatened initiation of proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the notice was not a valid notice under …
The petitioner, Udai Singh Saini, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, but counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition was not pressed at this stage. The …
The petitioner, Akhilesh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent (the SDM, Chouri Choura) to decide a pending transfer application (No. C 202605000000537 of 2026) expeditiously. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being …
Baliram Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, but the petition was challenged on the ground that it was not pressed at this stage of proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioner, Saroj Sonkar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a court, to decide a pending case (No. 3991/2025) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2025 despite multiple dates being fixed. The High Court examined the …
Petitioner Sahabaj Chauhan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue officer, to decide a pending case (RST/5773/2025) under sections 34 and 209(ज) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2025 despite …
The petitioner Anita filed writ petition No.17497 of 2026 seeking a direction to the second respondent, a revenue authority, to decide a restoration/recall application pending in suit RST/5323/2025. The petitioner contended that the application had remained undecided despite several dates being …
Petitioner Amar Nath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide an application dated 24 September 2020 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for land demarcation. The petitioner alleged that the application remained pending despite several …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Panasa to decide a pending mutation suit (case no. 15878 of 2024) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending since 2024 despite several dates being …
Petitioner Lal Babu Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No. 2) to decide case No. 7072/2024 filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the proceeding should be …
The petitioner, Mohammad Ayub Khan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Sikandarpur, Ballia to decide a stay application pending in appeal No. 20261509020215. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the stay application remained …
Shiv Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Assistant Sub‑Divisional Officer, II, Jaunpur to decide an application dated 17‑12‑2016 under Section 229(b) of the U.P. Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950, which had remained pending since 2016. He had previously filed a similar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Baheri to hear a pending restoration application filed on 03‑11‑2025 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the application …
Petitioner Shyam Vijay filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 15304 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed at this stage. The Court accepted the prayer and held that the petition …
Petitioner Laxmi Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.2) to decide a pending mutation case (Case No. 685 of 2020) under Section 34 of the Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2020 despite multiple dates being fixed. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Satyendra Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on several parcels of public land in Ghazipur district. The respondents contested the petition, and the Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection …
Petitioner Bachu Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Mathura to decide a pending restoration application (Case No. 5460 of 2025) filed under section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the application had been …
Petitioner Smt. Priti Shukla filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Prayagraj to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.3120 of 2026) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained …
The petitioner, Hari Narayan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 10.03.2026 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh, in Appeal No.805 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202515000000805) titled Lalji v. …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kerakat, under Section 209(J) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2005, and also requested an interim mandamus to prevent any interference with his peaceful possession of land. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (Respondent No.2) to decide a declaratory suit (T201917650102907 of 2019) that had been pending since 2019 despite multiple dates being fixed. The petitioners …
The petitioner, Smt. Santosh Kumari Upadhyay, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur, to decide her pending application (No. 13922/2025) for consolidation of two mutation cases involving the same parties and property. The petitioner argued that …
Petitioners Kamal Pandey and another filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 09‑04‑2026 passed by the appellate court in appeal No. D201916660000091 (now RST/1780/2025) and to compel the court to decide pending stay applications concerning possession of two land parcels in …
The petitioner Karim filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 6191 of 1978) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition remained pending for many years and, on the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that the matter was very old, dating …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh Gangwar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to expedite the decision in case No. 7973 of 2023 (Gram Samaj, Khanpur vs Pramod Kumar, Khanali) under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the delay in …
The petitioners, Chhiddu Singh and others, filed a review application challenging a 2001 order of the Allahabad High Court. They sought condonation of delay for filing the review, but the affidavit provided did not sufficiently explain the lapse. The court found the cause shown inadequate and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide a pending case (Shyamdev v. Gaon Sabha) under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been delayed since 2024 despite several dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the revisional court that remanded the proceedings back to the lower court for a fresh decision. The petitioner alleged that the revisional court had acted illegally in remanding the case. The High Court examined the record and the …
The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the first appellate court in proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of filing …
The petitioner, Chhotak @ Chhotkan Vishambhar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Barhaj, Deoria, to decide a suit filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that …
Arvind Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to expedite the pending case No. 10830 of 2025, which is filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained undecided …
The petitioner, Fulmati, filed a writ petition under Section 33(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent (a lower court) to decide the pending case T20220547011095 (Fulmati vs. Nageshar) which had been delayed since 2022 despite several …
The petitioner, Gopeshwar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Rudrapur to decide a pending revenue case (RST/1174/2025) concerning a land mutation. The petition alleged that despite several dates being fixed since 2025, the respondent had not rendered a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Sadar Jaunpur to decide a restoration application dated 14‑06‑2019, which had remained pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petition alleged undue delay and prayed for an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Officer, to decide a land dispute case (No.3540 of 2017) pending under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They argued that the proceedings had been pending since 2017 and that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tamkuhiraj Tehsil to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 1219/2024) under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The Court, after hearing …
Pappu filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing respondent No.2 to decide an interim application dated 04‑04‑2026 in Appeal No.112 of 2018 (Budhiraji v. Mannuram). The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the interim application remained …
The petitioner, Shiv Pujan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shahganj, to decide a restoration application pending since August 2025 under sections 209h and 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had been fixed but …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to protect their land (Gata No. 33) in Kaushambi district and to stop illegal construction by other respondents. The court observed that the dispute was essentially between private parties and not a matter of …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2‑5 to act against respondent 6 for an alleged illegal encroachment on a 386‑hectare plot in Azamgarh. The court noted that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, as …
Petitioner Murari filed a writ petition challenging two orders—one dated 23 September 2025 issued by the District Magistrate, Bareilly, and another dated 29 March 2025 issued by the Tehsildar (Sadar), Bareilly—on the ground that they were passed in violation of the procedural requirements laid down …
Durga Charan and another filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 01.07.2025 that dismissed their application filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners contended that the order was liable to be challenged before the High Court. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
The petitioner filed a supplementary affidavit seeking to have an impleadment application allowed in an appeal under Section 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. He contended that the complainant was neither a necessary nor a proper party and therefore should not be impleaded as a …
The petitioners, Bindu Kumar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Badalapur to decide their representation dated 23‑01‑2026 under Section 24(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to deliver possession of land and demolish illegal …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. A notice dated 4 January 2018 was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel, but no appearance was made. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …
The petitioners, Suresh Chand and another, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Alok Kumar Srivastava, moved the court for withdrawal of the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the …
The petitioners challenged a lower court order dated 03.10.2025 that dismissed their appeal on the ground of insufficient court fees. The High Court examined whether such an order constitutes a decree and is therefore appealable under Article 227. The Court held that the order is indeed a decree and …
The petitioners challenged the appellate court's order dated 13.01.2026 that stayed an interim injunction granted by the trial court on 18.12.2025. The respondents argued that the injunction was being used to interfere with their possession of the disputed property, justifying the stay. The High …
The petitioners, Bandana and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide Original Suit No. 746 of 2024 within a stipulated period, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court observed that the suit has been pending …
The petitioners, Dr. Amit Akhil and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Gorakhpur, to decide Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2025 (Manati Jaiswal v. Ganesh Pratap Singh) expeditiously. The petition argued that the appeal had been pending since 2025 and …
The petition under Article 227 challenged the trial court's handling of an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that the revisional court had already remanded the matter to the trial court, leaving little for the trial court to decide, and that the petition …
The petitioner, Udit Narain, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar, to decide an application dated 03‑08‑2023 filed in Original Suit No. 105 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the application had remained pending …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking an order directing the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal to decide Claim Petition No. 74 of 2017, which had been pending since 2017, within a specific period. The petitioner argued that the prolonged delay …
The petitioners, Mazz Abu Saeed Adult and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to decide Company Petition No.09/ALD/2024, which has been pending since 2024. The petition invoked Sections 241, 242 read with …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Shahar, Jaunpur to decide a pending interim injunction application (6‑C) filed in original suit No. 523/2024. The petitioner argued that the 6‑C application, filed in 2024 under Order …
The petitioner, Smt. Kirti (Saloni), filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Moradabad, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No. 593 of 2023) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the trial had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Civil Judge, Second Hapur, to decide a pending 6‑C interim injunction application in Civil Suit No. 181 of 2023 and to restrain the respondent from interfering with their peaceful possession of the land. The …
The petition was filed by Rati Shukla under Article 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that she no longer wishes to press the petition. The court examined whether a petition can be dismissed solely on the ground that it is not pressed by the petitioner. No …
The petitioner, Smt. Meena, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kairana, District Shamli, to decide a pending interim injunction application (6C application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC) that had been pending since 2025. The …
The petitioner, Shyamu Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli, to decide a pending interim injunction application (6C) filed in Original Suit No. 209 of 2023. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Prayagraj to decide a pending suit and an interim injunction application (6C) filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC, and to maintain status quo until the decision. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioner, mother of a railway accident victim, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation be released immediately, with the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for three years. She argued that the amount was inequitable and …
The petitioners, parents of a son who died in a railway accident on 03‑06‑2010, obtained a compensation award of Rs 8,00,000 from the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal on 30‑05‑2024, but the Tribunal ordered that only Rs 80,000 be released immediately with the balance kept in a fixed deposit for …
The petitioner, Smt. Shanti, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation awarded for the death of her son be released immediately, with the balance placed in a fixed deposit for three years. She argued that the partial release was …
The petitioner suffered a leg amputation in a railway accident on 31‑01‑2020 and filed a claim on 29‑06‑2021. The Railway Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a compensation of ₹3,20,000 on 23‑02‑2026 but ordered that only ₹32,000 be released immediately, with the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit …
The petitioners, the widow and three daughters of a railway accident victim, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation award be released immediately, with the balance placed in a three‑year fixed deposit. They argued that the …
The petitioners challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that released only Rs.40,000 of a Rs.4,00,000 compensation award for the death of the husband/father in a 2019 railway accident, arguing it was inequitable. The Tribunal had directed the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for …
The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar Gautam, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the First Additional Civil Judge (Jr.D.) at Kasya, Kushinagar to decide a pending application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC (Misc. case No. 44/2018) arising from original suit No. 748/2003 (Ram …
The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, to hear and decide his divorce petition (No. 266/2025) filed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, S.D. Ist District Jaunpur, to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 99 of 2024 (Vinod Kumar v. Shiv Shankar) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2024 …
The petitioner, Gyanandra Oratap Maurya, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the district judiciary to expedite the disposal of an original civil suit (No. 528 of 2003) pending before the Civil Judge (J.D) at F.T.C Jaunpur. The suit, initiated in 2003, had seen multiple dates …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Baberu, District Banda, to decide a pending interim injunction application filed on 13 November 2024 in Original Suit No. 163/2024. The petitioner argued that despite several dates …
Balram Prajapati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Deoria, to decide an objection filed on 19-10-2019 and the related interim injunction application in Original Suit No.1687 of 2019. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner Vidya Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Agra, to decide a pending suit (OS No. 852/2024) expeditiously. The High Court examined the request and noted that the suit had been pending since 2024 with several dates fixed. Relying …
The petitioners, parents of a son who died in a railway accident on 10‑08‑2018, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that released only Rs. 80,000 of the Rs. 8,00,000 compensation awarded, directing the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for three years. They argued that the …
The petitioners, parents of a son who died in a railway accident on 13.01.2015, challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's award that released only Rs 80,000 of the Rs 8,00,000 compensation, with the balance to be kept in a fixed deposit for three years. They argued that the limited immediate …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of their application filed under Order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the order was appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(t) of the CPC. The Court examined …
Petitioner Parvej Alam filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction for the early disposal of his family law case (Case No. 290 of 2024) pending before the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ballia. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2024 …
The petitioners, represented by counsel Anshu Chaudhary, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.I.) Kasya of District Kushinagar to expedite the disposal of Original Suit No. 1552/1998 (Ambika Singh v. Phool Kunwar). The petition alleged that the original suit was …
The petitioner challenged a civil judge's order that allowed the defendant to amend his written statement six and a half years after filing it, adding a limitation defence and a claim of adverse possession. The petitioner argued that the delay should bar the amendment and that the amendment would …
The revisionist Rajat Agarwal filed a revision challenging an order dated 17.05.2025 passed by the Rent Tribunal/Additional District & Session Judge in Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2021. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that, according to the Allahabad High Court’s decision in Jupiter Chit …
The appellant, Dukh Haran, filed a second appeal (No. 1079 of 1982) against the respondents, Priya Nath and others, before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, and the court noted that the appellant seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The appellant, Preetam Singh, filed a second appeal but failed to appear before the High Court. The court noted that no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal. It was observed that the appellant seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed …
Jumnai filed a second appeal (No. 1517 of 1983) before the Allahabad High Court against a decree in favor of M. Ahmad. The appeal was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the matter. The court observed that the appellant seemed uninterested in pursuing the appeal. …
The petitioners, Mohd. Yakub and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Board of Revenue. The petition was listed but no petitioner appeared to pursue the matter. The court noted that the petitioners seemed uninterested in continuing the proceedings. …
The petition filed by Smt. Hadisunnisha challenged the order dated 29‑03‑2019 that directed vacant possession of a disputed property to the decree holder in Execution Case No. 5 of 1981. The petitioner argued that the execution case had been transferred to another court while related miscellaneous …
The petitioners Gulam and others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Court No. 31, Azamgarh, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC in suit No. 1658 of 2022, which had remained pending since 2022. The petition argued …
The petitioners, Amar Sahu and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (South) to decide M.A.C.P. Case No. 323 of 2020, which had remained pending since 2020. The petition alleged undue …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 challenging the appellate court’s order that rejected their application filed under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code. The High Court examined whether that order was appealable and whether it warranted interference. It held that the order is …
The petitioner Smt Ramwati filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a stay order dated 19 February 2026 issued by the District Judge, Etah, which had stayed an interim injunction granted by the Trial Court on 13 January 2026. The petitioner argued that the stay was improperly granted …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 19‑02‑2026 of the District Judge, Etah, which stayed an interim injunction granted by the trial court on 13‑01‑2026. The petitioner contended that the stay was erroneous because the court had not examined the merits of the appeal and …
The petitioner, Muhammad Shakib, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.7, Bareilly, to decide a pending interim injunction application filed by the plaintiff‑respondents in Original Suit No. 309 of 2024. The petitioner …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's assistance to enforce an injunction order previously passed by the trial court. The petition alleged that the lower court had not complied with its own injunction. The High Court examined the petition and found it to be …
The petitioner, Smt. Gita Devi, filed a writ petition challenging the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal's order that released only 25% (₹2,00,000) of the ₹8,00,000 compensation awarded for the death of her son in a railway accident on 15 September 2019. She argued that the partial release was …
The petitioners sought a larger immediate release of compensation awarded by the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal for the death of Shanti Devi, the wife of petitioner No.1, in a railway accident on 20 June 2023. The Tribunal had ordered only ₹80,000 to be released immediately, with the balance of …
Petitioner Shatrughan Maurya filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Jaunpur to decide the pending Nagar Palika Appeal No.06/2025 and to protect his houses until that decision is rendered. The petitioner contended that the appeal had been …
The petitioners challenged the Railway Accident Claims Tribunal’s order that only ₹80,000 of the ₹8,00,000 compensation awarded for the death of petitioner No.1’s husband be released immediately, with the balance placed in a fixed deposit for three years. They argued that the partial release was …
The petitioner Abdul Gani filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide Civil Suit No.1491 of 2023 within a fixed period and to prevent interference with his possession of disputed land. The High Court …
