Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
205 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The Hindustani Education Society filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioners submitted a list dated 01.07.2026 showing that petitioner No.3's name had been entered in the Shalarth ID, marked for identification. The court held that the …
Shri Makradhwaj Shikshan Sanstha and Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Research MIT filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking that the State of Maharashtra release a grant‑in‑aid dated 1 November 2020. The petitioners contended that the matter could be decided by Respondent No. …
The petitioner, Rekha Prabhakar Pansare, filed a writ petition but had superannuated on 31 May 2026, with all her benefits already granted. The court examined whether any relief remained to be granted. Finding that no benefits or rights survived post‑superannuation, the court held the petition to be …
M/s Arshi Builder and Developer, through its partner Dattatraya Devram Khandekar, filed Writ Petition No. 665 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later submitted a communication dated 12 March 2026 seeking the …
The petitioner, Vithoba Laxman Mhaske, filed a writ petition (904 WRIT PETITION NO.1948 OF 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner died in 2023. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court of the death. The court examined whether the …
The petitioner, Prabhat Sheku Narwade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the advocate for respondent No. 3 informed the Court that the payment sought by the petitioner had already been made. …
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The …
The petitioners, employees deployed in tribal and PESA areas, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra and the Education Officer opposed, contending procedural issues. The Court …
The petitioners, representing the estates of two deceased individuals, filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking redress of pending representations dated 15 November 1995, 11 December 2024 and 12 December 2024. The High Court examined whether the State was obligated to consider …
The petitioner, Datta Baswantrao Patil, filed a writ petition alleging that a revision application (Revision No.708/2015) pending before the State of Maharashtra had not been decided for 11 years. The petitioner sought direction for the respondent to decide the revision promptly. The High Court …
The petitioner, Nandkishor Pannalal Oswal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the failure of Respondent No.4 to decide his representation dated 18 April 2022. The petition alleged that despite a report submitted by the Additional Collector on 6 June 2022, no decision had …
The petitioner, Kishanrao Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Udgir, challenged the order dated 08.08.2024 in which its proposal for the transfer of an Ashram school was rejected on the ground of four deficiencies. The petitioner remedied all the deficiencies and communicated the compliance to the Additional …
Rekha Adevappa Chakre filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking that the State of Maharashtra provide certain information. The petitioners alleged that the information was essential for proceeding with a proposal. The Court examined whether the State, as a public …
The petitioner, Smt. Pushpa, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a writ petition against Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth. The application argued that the delay was justified and requested permission to amend the writ petition. The High Court examined whether the delay …
The petitioners, Chhotulal Magan Pawar and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later informed the Court that they had received the benefits under the second A.C.P. scheme. On this basis, the petitioners submitted that there was no longer any cause of action. …
The petitioners, non‑teaching staff of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14‑03‑2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 01‑01‑2024. They argued that the resolution was …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to measure a parcel of land (Gat No. 106) that had been acquired for a road project. The land was taken into possession in August 1979, with acquisition notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act and a final …
The petitioners, Prakash Gunwantrao Deshmukh and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of delay in their proceedings. The State of Maharashtra, as respondent, opposed the relief. The court examined the reasons for the delay and the merits of the prayer …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, contested the claim. …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, invoking a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and related authorities, …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, challenged the denial of salary benefits and the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, invoking a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The High Court noted that the matter had already been decided by its …
The petitioners, employees deployed in primary and secondary schools in tribal and PESA areas of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra and the Education Officer …
Two writ petitions filed by government employees sought the benefit of advance increments that were allegedly discontinued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that the Government Resolution dated 24‑08‑2017 and the subsequent circular of 04‑09‑2018 should have retrospective effect, …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing and removal of office objections. The court examined the reasons provided in the application and considered the applicable procedural provisions. It determined that the delay was justified and could be condoned upon …
The petitions were filed by teachers and the management of Dnyan Sandeep Shikshan Sanstha against each other concerning disputes in the education sector. While the writ petitions were pending, the parties negotiated and reached an amicable settlement, the terms of which were placed on record. The …
The petitioners, former landowners affected by the Tembhapuri Medium Project, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a government letter, allocation of alternative land, and compensation for land acquired between 1981 and 1987. They relied on a 1974 Government Resolution and argued that the …
The petitioner, Namdeo Keshavrao Pawar, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of delay in his proceedings against the State of Maharashtra and others. The application relied on a specific prayer clause (Clause “C”) requesting that the court excuse the delay and …
The petitioners, a group of primary Ashram schools, filed writ petitions seeking grant‑in‑aid similar to that granted to another institution. They relied on a Government Resolution dated 25‑05‑2021, which, however, stipulated that such grants could be decided only after the Finance Department’s …
The petitioner, Radheshyam Bhagwat Sonawane, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a punishment order. During the pendency of the petition, he pursued an alternate remedy by directly challenging the punishment order in the appropriate forum. The petitioner’s counsel submitted …
The petitioners, Dadashiv Pandhari Khandare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision. While the case was pending, the petitioners received an award and decided to withdraw the petition, communicating this to their counsel on 5 March …
The petitioners, education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The issue was whether the respondents were …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that had directed the State to release the respondent's gratuity and regular pension while his appeal against an acquittal was pending. The respondent, Bhimrao Namdeo More, had been …
The petitioners, a group of parents, filed a writ petition alleging that the State Education Department officials (respondents Nos.3 and 4) refused to accept proposals submitted by the school management and headmaster on 17‑January‑2024. The petitioners contended that the proposals must be …
The applicant, a child in conflict with law, was convicted of murdering his father by assault with a dumbbell and stabbing with a knife, and sentenced to life imprisonment under IPC Section 302. He filed an application for bail pending his appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in its …
Syed Nazem Syed Azam filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra, including the removal of certain office objections. The applicant, represented by Advocate Ashok Gaikwad, argued that the objections were unwarranted and …
The petitioners, employees deployed in primary and secondary education in tribal and PESA areas, claimed they were denied salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and related arrears as per a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They filed multiple writ petitions challenging the denial of …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed the writ petition (WP/2844/2024) for further consideration on 22 June 2026. The court also ordered that the accompanying civil application (CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4174 OF 2026) be disposed of. No substantive merits of the petition were discussed in the …
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, claimed they were not receiving salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, despite a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They filed a …
The Union of India filed a civil application seeking to vacate an ad‑interim relief that had been granted in a writ petition filed by Shirdi Country Inns Private Ltd., which restrained the Union from taking coercive action pending the writ. The Union argued that the relief prevented it from …
The petitioner, Shrinivas Gulabrao Adhav, filed a writ petition seeking certain benefits. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that an order dated 1 February 2023 had already conferred all the claimed benefits on him. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in continuing the petition …
Ravindra Hirnalal Madavgate filed Writ Petition No. 5160 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Patil Indrale Anand Vinayakrao, filed a Vakalatnama, resulting in the discharge of …
Petitioner Minhaj Ahmed Taj Ahemed Hashmi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the respondent counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had already been …
The accused Ramesh Bhagwan Munde and Amol (applicants) were convicted of murder, abetment of suicide and a common intention offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. They filed a bail application claiming procedural irregularities such as a discrepancy in …
Yusufkhan Sikandar Khan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in deciding his representation dated 12 June 2025. The petition sought a directive for the State of Maharashtra, specifically respondent No.5, to adjudicate the representation. The …
The applicants, Vitthal Parvati Bhagat and others, filed a writ petition (Stamp No.23751 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was delayed, and the respondents raised objections to the filing. The Court, …
The petitioners, Pradip Chandrakant Mekhe and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, which later faced procedural delays. They moved a civil application seeking condonation of the delay, arguing that the lapse should not prejudice their substantive rights. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning the password of the 'Shalarth ID' of Saraswatibai Secondary School and the timely disbursement of salary. The Respondent State, through its Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the password has already been reset and that the …
Mahesh Chandrakant Ukhrande filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The petition was presented by Advocate Mr. Annasaheb R. Barate, while the respondents were represented by Ms. N. B. Kamble (AGP) and Mr. …
The petitioners, Varad Gopal Nikam and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Kalpana Kulkarni Sonpawale, later applied for permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty …
Manisha Sanjeevkumar Dalvi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction against the State of Maharashtra to decide on a proposal she submitted on 30 January 2026, which had been forwarded by the Education Officer. The petition alleged that the concerned …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Aradhana Arvind Deshmukh as an Assistant Professor on an ad‑hoc basis. The petition alleged that the appointment was a back‑door entry and sought regularisation of the post. The High Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 6548 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed before a two‑Judge Bench comprising Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. No arguments were advanced by …
Satish Rajaram Pimparkar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra (respondent No.5) to provide labour for completing a concrete road work under a work order. The petitioner alleged that the work was incomplete and required judicial intervention. The Court examined the …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, had not granted the …
Santosh Pandit Rathod filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others for not deciding his representation dated 9 April 2021. The petitioner alleged that the respondents had failed to consider his representation on its merits, violating …
The petitioners Harshvardhan Baliram Tayade and others filed a writ petition seeking a decision on their representations dated 21 October 2024 and 13 April 2026 submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (respondent No.5). They claimed the CEO had not acted despite a Government Resolution dated 18 …
Smt. Sakkarbai Shrinivas Sarda filed a writ petition seeking direction to the Collector and Superintendent of Excise in Ahilyanagar to implement a 2016 order of the Minister of State Excise concerning the renewal of her excise licence. The respondents produced letters and an order dated 24‑02‑2025 …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a final award dated 13 September 2021 issued by respondent No.3. They argued that they have an alternate efficacious remedy under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that …
Vilas Laxmanrao Dadpe filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Collector of Dharashiv regarding a representation dated 02 September 2025. The petitioner, represented by Mr. S.T. Bhimale (on behalf of Mr. S.S. Kulkarni), sought a directive …
The petitioners, Megha Madhukar Lahankar and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Yogesh Dharmadhikar, appearing on behalf of Mr. A.G. …
Shrimant Laxman Gadekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. The Court, after hearing, indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. On the Court's direction, the petitioner's …
Several writ petitions were filed by individual petitioners challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that the matter was already decided by a Full Bench of this Court in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan Vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) SCC Online Bom 729, a decision that is …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on their representation dated 09 January 2023, which the respondent had not yet acted upon. The petition alleged undue delay and violation of their right to a timely administrative decision. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Annasaheb R. Abhale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents regarding his representation dated 06/04/2026. The petition sought a directive for the respondents to consider the representation on its …
The applicant, Jaganath Govindrao Phulare, sought the withdrawal of the full amount of an arbitration award of Rs.14,31,37,791 dated 28 December 2018, which had previously been challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and dismissed. The respondent, the Union of …
The petitioner, Dnyaneswar Pralhadrao Renge, filed a writ petition seeking inclusion in the Shalarth Pranali and issuance of a Shalarth ID. The Court observed that the issues raised were identical to those decided in Writ Petition No.1520/2026 dated 04.03.2026. Relying on that precedent, the Court …
The petitioner, Shaikh Aref Namdar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief regarding an application he had submitted to the State Information Commission on 22 July 2025. The petition alleged that the Commission had not yet decided the application. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Narayan Harishchandra Gite, filed a writ petition seeking his transfer from an unaided assistant teacher post to an aided post in a school managed by respondent No.5. The respondents had already appointed another candidate who had passed the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) and argued …
The petitioner, Bharde Saksharata Prasarak Mandal Shevgaon, filed a writ petition challenging the delay by the Education Officer (Primary) in deciding a proposal dated 27 December 2018. The petition alleged that the prolonged inaction violated statutory duties and the petitioner’s rights. The High …
The applicants filed two civil applications seeking to recall a court order dated 09/10/2024 that directed the Tahsildar, Nanded to decide on a representation filed on 22/08/2024. The order required a decision within three months, which was not initially taken, leading to a contempt petition; …
The petitioner, Pramod Deelip Kshirsagar, filed a writ petition (No. 5582 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the submission that the petition was no …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a correction to an order dated 22 June 2026. They contended that the terms "Divisional Commissioner" and "Rule 13" in the first two paragraphs of the order were erroneous and should be replaced with "Chief …
Sudam Eknath Khandagale was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur, under Section 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, attracting a maximum imprisonment of three years. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail, arguing that his appeal …
Nandkumar Ganpat Lawande filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar. The petition sought relief, but the court did not grant the specific relief claimed. Instead, the judges granted …
The petitioner, Anand Kashiram Sapkale, received salary arrears as per the 7th Pay Commission after a two‑year delay and sought interest on the delayed payment. The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The Court noted the petitioner's claim and directed him to make a …
The petitioner, Nanasaheb Eknath Bade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time, and the court observed that due to the passage of time, no material or relief remained viable in the …
Vinod Arjun Wagh, an expelled member of a private association (Respondent No.4), filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to conclude an action he claimed had been initiated through several communications between 2020 and 2021. He relied on the decision in Board of …
Petitioners Rushikesh Ashok Jadhav and Smt. Kalpana Digambar Walke filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on proposals they submitted on 24 March 2023. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and its officials, had not yet ruled on these proposals. The petitioners …
The case concerned the death of Namdeo Dnyanba Motekar and involved a civil application and writ petition filed against the Union of India and other respondents. The applicant sought relief and an amendment as specified in Clause B of the prayer. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard the …
The petitioner, Trupti Jayantrao Lalsare, filed a civil application and a writ petition (WP/1757/2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel argued that the civil application should be rendered infructuous. The Court agreed and disposed of the civil application. The writ petition …
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought monetary benefits and recalculation of their pensionary benefits, claiming they were entitled to higher pensions based on the last drawn salary and annual increments. The State argued that the petitioners were not eligible for interest on arrears …
The petitioner, Aarti Salve, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the school (Respondent No.1) to hand over her minor daughter Avantika's leaving certificate. The background is a mutual‑consent divorce decree from the Family Court, Dhule, which awarded custody of the daughter to the husband …
The petitioner, Indira Gandhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Government to include the village of Hasnabad in the perspective plan for the academic year 2020‑2021. The Court noted that the perspective plan is a five‑year document whose term, commencing in …
The petitioners, a group of former government employees, filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment of their last drawn salary. The High Court examined whether the …
The petitioners, former government employees of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. They contended that the pension should reflect the actual salary, including the annual increment, and that they were entitled to any …
The petitioner, Suyog Seva Pratishthan, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to decide a proposal dated 06‑01‑2006. The petition was filed more than 18 years after the date of the proposal. The Court held that such a long delay precludes entertaining the petition. …
Bhanudas, son of Shriram Uttwar, filed Writ Petition No. 6956 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Amol Ashok Kokad, later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the …
Sheshrao Dattshetti Tuptewar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order of the State Bank of India's Deputy Managing Director and to compel the bank and its officials to follow a 2013 circular on the rotation-based allocation of cases to panel advocates, including himself. The petitioner argued …
In Writ Petition No.7643 of 2026, the petitioner, Sachin Ratnakar Deshmukh, moved a motion before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 22/07/2026. The petitioner contended that the date mentioned in the second line of the first paragraph, …
Two writ petitions were filed by groups of students against the State of Maharashtra challenging the non‑implementation of directions issued by the District Level Grievance Redressal Committee, Latur, dated 18 September 2025. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Shirsat Suhas R, sought a court order …
The petitioner, a charitable trust, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a 2010 Board Resolution and allotment letter by CIDCO that allocated a plot in New Aurangabad to another trust (Respondent No.3) and to have the plot allotted to the petitioner instead. The petitioner argued that its …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their representation dated 12 April 2018, seeking rental compensation under Government Circulars of 1 December 1972 and 2 April 1979, had not been decided by Respondent No.2. The Court examined whether the administrative authority was obligated to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their representation dated 2 April 2018, seeking rental compensation under Government Circulars of 1 December 1972 and 2 April 1979, had not been decided by Respondent No.2. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to decide the …
The petitioner, Swati Bhagwan Hange, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the State of Maharashtra, respondent No.2, to decide a proposal she submitted on 1 August 2025 within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the delay in decision violated her rights. The respondent, …
Sunil Ramkrishna Koli filed a civil application against the State of Maharashtra, which was delayed in filing. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and the application allowed. It found that the delay was excusable and permitted the application in accordance with prayer Clause …
The petitioner, a teacher, sought transfer on the ground that he has been serving in a difficult, hilly area since 2022, citing certificates from the Forest Department and Public Works Department indicating the presence of wild animals and a distance of more than 10 km from the nearest highway. The …
The applicant, Ashish Chandan Imale, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in his proceedings against the Union of India and others. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned under the applicable procedural rules. Relying on the submissions and the merits of the …
The applicant university sought modification of an ad‑interim order that had barred it from finalising the appointment of a professor after an interview held on 1 July 2026. The university argued that the interview result was pending and it should be allowed to declare the result and complete the …
Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees' Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …
Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …
Syed Afroz Begum and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 June 2022 that altered their pay scale. The petition contended that Clause‑3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016 was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court observed that the …
Mohan Kisanrao Bhosale and another filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding their representation dated 22 June 2026. They sought a directive compelling the State and other respondents to make a decision on the representation. The Court examined the relevant Government policy, …
The petitioners, a group of employees, filed writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation seeking payment of pending dues and statutory interest. The Municipal Corporation, as respondent No.3, argued that it would form a special team to verify each claim. The Court …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing their petition before the High Court at Aurangabad. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned under the principles of civil procedure. It held that condonation is permissible provided the applicants comply …
The petitioner, Nivruti Ramrao Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking appointment under the Project Affected Persons (PAP) reservation quota. Respondent No.2 argued that the petitioner’s mother had already been appointed under the same quota in 1990 and that the scheme permits only one appointment …
The petitioner, Rupanjali Narayanrao Kanchi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No. 4 to take a decision in accordance with a Government communication dated 01.01.2025. The petitioner had made a representation to respondent No. 4 on 09.01.2025 and alleged delay in decision. The …
The petitioners, Shahedav Uttam Khengare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on their representation dated 17 April 2026. The Court examined the petition and directed Respondent No.5 to decide the representation on its merits. The order required the …
The petitioners, Dhondiram Tulshiram Madale and another, filed a writ petition challenging actions in acquisition proceedings. They sought permission to withdraw the petition and later file an appropriate application after the first appeals by the claimants were decided, relying on a Supreme Court …
The petitioners challenged an office order that terminated their services for not acquiring a required qualification and removed one petitioner from a select list. They relied on earlier decisions of the Nagpur Bench in Writ Petition Nos. 3251/2021 and 1231/2022, where similarly situated candidates …
Petitioner Sandeep Gangadhar BhalSing filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition raised the issue of the respondent's failure to decide the petitioner's representation dated 10 June 2026. …
Petitioner Pravin Kerbarao Bhise filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representation dated 08 June 2026. The petition sought a directive for the State to consider and decide on the representation. The …
The petitioner, Gajanan Jaganrao Panchal, filed a civil application seeking relief in a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered the application and, relying on the reasons set out in the petition, allowed it in accordance with prayer …
The University was directed by an ad‑interim order to hold interviews for two professor posts but was restrained from declaring results or finalising appointments. The original respondent (the University) applied to modify that order, arguing that the selection process was stalled and that the …
Mateen Majeed Shaikh filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking amendment of the pleadings to add new respondents. The State of Maharashtra and other respondents opposed the amendment. The Court examined whether the amendment was permissible under the …
The petitioners, Hanif Khan and Syed Sarwar, filed a civil application and writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others, seeking to amend the pleadings to add additional respondents. The court examined whether such an amendment was permissible under procedural law. Relying on the …
Three writ petitions were filed by private schools alleging that, despite admitting students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, the State of Maharashtra had not reimbursed the statutory fees. The High Court noted the uniform grievance and the need for prompt …
The petitioner, Duryodhan Arun Rathod, filed a writ petition seeking the inclusion of his name in the Shalarth ID. Respondent No.3 had already recommended his inclusion by a communication dated 18‑12‑2025. The petition raised the question of whether the authorities were bound to act on that …
The petitioner, Bhaskar Mahadev Ware, filed a civil application and a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised objections concerning the representation dated 14 February 2022 and alleged procedural …
Rohidas Rama Sarode filed a civil application (Civil Application No. 7557 of 2026) and a writ petition (WP/154/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The respondents, represented by Ms. Neha B. Kamble, raised no objection to the relief sought. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad …
The petitioner, Ram Govind Bahudeshiya Sanstha, filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not decided a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 15 October 2024. The petition sought a judicial direction compelling the respondent authority to act on the proposal. The High Court …
Ram Govind Bahudeshiya Sanstha, through its Secretary Seema S. Rajput, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to decide a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 15 October 2024. The petition was heard by Justices Nitin …
Dadabhau Vilas Shelke filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The application was filed after a delay, and the respondent State opposed condonation of the delay. The court examined whether the delay could be justified …
Maya Ramesh Bhaghat and others filed a civil application seeking relief from a delay in their writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and what …
The petitioner, Jayant Raju Ambhore, sought appointment on compassionate ground after his father, a police constable, died in service; his application was rejected because his step‑mother (Respondent No.3) had a pending application for the same. The petitioner challenged the Maharashtra …
The Islahul Banat Urdu Secondary and Higher Secondary School filed a writ petition (No. 9117 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, represented by Adv. Jadhavar Santosh S., sought relief against the State and other …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard three writ petitions filed by private schools alleging that, despite admitting students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, they had not received the statutory fee reimbursements. The petitioners contended that the …
The petitioners, Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society, sought to recruit a Headmaster and Assistant Teachers for their schools, but a communication dated 22‑07‑2024 barred recruitment pending a management dispute before the Charity Commissioner. The petitioners argued that the pending …
The petitioners challenged recoveries of excess salary amounts made by the Zilla Parishad, arguing they were never shown cause nor required to execute any undertaking. Although the petitioners had executed undertakings in 1999 to refund any excess payments, the recoveries were effected more than …
The petitioner, Pandharinath Gorakh Chaudhary, filed a writ petition seeking the release of payment for his earned leave encashment from the Education Officer (Secondary) of Zilla Parishad Dhule and related authorities. The Court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to such encashment under …
The petitioners, M/s Amar Technocraft and its proprietor, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRAT) in Securitisation Application No.36/2019, contending that the Chairperson of the DRAT was unavailable at the time of the order. They sought permission to withdraw …
The petitioner, a retired primary teacher, challenged a 2017 recovery order that sought to deduct Rs. 2,88,946 from his pension on the ground that he had received increments despite not obtaining a B.Ed. qualification. The petitioner argued that the pay scales for graduate primary teachers and …
The applicant, Ganesh Baburao Kshirsagar, filed a civil application seeking to amend Writ Petition No. 3450 of 2024 by adding Sainath Pandurang Gomare as respondent No. 3. The court examined whether such an amendment was permissible under the prayer clause ‘B’ of the original petition. Relying on …
Union Bank of India filed writ petition No. 2621 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the court noted that the office objections and the address of respondent No. 3 had not been furnished. The …
Kantabai Chandrakant Jadhao and another filed a civil application seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants contended that the writ petition filed earlier should be reinstated. The court examined the reasons set out in the civil application and considered the pending office …
Shaikh Iqbal Dagdumiya filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking condonation of delay. The Court examined whether the procedural delay could be condoned under the applicable law. It held that the delay may be condoned provided the petitioner pays a fee of …
Three writ petitions were filed by private schools alleging that, despite admitting students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, the State of Maharashtra had not reimbursed the statutory fees. The High Court noted that similar facts existed across the petitions …
M/s. Bhagyalaxmi Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted permission. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as …
The Maharashtra Rajya Kharedi Vikri Sangathana filed writ petition No. 10697 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction to the Transport Commissioner to decide on a representation it had sent via email on 13 July 2021. The petitioner alleged that the respondents had …
Petitioner Kismat Kamruddin Shaikh claimed that 16 Are of his 77 Are land, acquired for National Highway No. 752, were not accounted for in the acquisition records, which showed only 61 Are. He issued a notice and filed an application for measurement, but the Public Works Department did not respond. …
Anju alias Anjana RanjU Tambe filed Writ Petition No. 10082 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of Respondent No.4 in deciding representations submitted on 21-12-2009, 26-04-2023 and 02-05-2023. The petition sought a directive compelling the respondent to …
Several groups of applicants filed writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. The petitions were challenged on procedural grounds, including alleged delay in filing, errors in the prayer clause, and pending office …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a series of civil applications (writ petitions) filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari, assisted by Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the State was represented …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard a batch of civil applications filed as writ petitions by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari on behalf of Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the respondents were represented …
A series of writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) were filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The petitions had been delayed, and the respondents raised office objections. The High Court, exercising its inherent powers, condoned the delay, ordered the …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay entertained a series of civil applications and writ petitions filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought relief including correction of the prayer clause and removal of office objections. The respondents raised …
Juned Layaque Shaikh and others filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking payment of the salary difference for the period 1‑10‑2020 to 30‑09‑2023, contending that the honorarium for "shikshan sevak" should not apply because their appointment was on a compassionate basis. The …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed multiple writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the petitions had been delayed and, after hearing counsel, condoned the delay and restored the petitions to their original positions. The court then …
The petitioners filed several civil applications against the State of Maharashtra seeking various reliefs. The court observed that the petitions had been delayed and considered condoning the delay. It ordered that the petitions be restored to their original positions and allowed the civil …
The petitioners, a group of appointed individuals, filed multiple civil applications and writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief. The court considered the delay in filing and, after hearing, condoned the delay, restoring the petitions to their original positions and allowing …
The petitioners, who are appointed officials, filed several civil applications and writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, after hearing the matter, condoned the delay in filing and restored the petitions to their original positions, thereby allowing the civil applications. …
Two NGOs, Vriddheswar Gramin Vikas Pratishthan and Shri Swami Prasad Pratishthan, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right to Education Act. The Court noted that the matter was already addressed in its earlier decision in Writ Petition No.6307 of …
The petitioners, a newly elected managing committee of Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society, sought to quash a communication dated 22‑07‑2024 that barred them from recruiting headmasters and assistant teachers. They argued that a pending change‑report before the Charity Commissioner should …
The petitioners, a newly elected managing committee of an educational society, challenged a communication dated 22‑07‑2024 that barred them from recruiting headmasters and assistant teachers, arguing that a pending change‑report before the Charity Commissioner should not impede recruitment. The …
Mahalaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd Jalna filed a civil application (No. 10289 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard the matter on 25 June 2026. The court allowed the application in accordance with prayer clause (B) and consequently …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra contended that the petitioners’ …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, challenged the denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas. They sought a directive that the Education Officer scrutinise their service records and, where no legal impediment exists, …
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas. They sought verification of their service records and …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 11465 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the petition was filed, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of …
The petitioners, Arjun Ashokkumar Bhutda and others, filed a writ petition seeking compensation, three times the market value of the land (TDR), and the RCC structure for land acquired by the corporation. The respondents (Corporation) contended that the petitioners' residential construction was …
Mahadev Eknath Mane and others filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants requested condonation of delay in filing the application. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General of the State, …
The petitioner, Ayesha Parveen, sought the quashing of an order dated 26‑04‑2023 issued by the Education Officer that denied her appointment and salary arrears, and also sought a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Education to grant her ID and arrears. The Zilla Parishad argued that no posts …
The applicants filed two civil applications seeking to recall the High Court's order dated 09‑10‑2024 in Writ Petition No.11267/2024, which had directed the Tahsildar to decide on a representation filed on 22‑08‑2024 within three months. After a contempt petition, the authorities eventually decided …
The petitioners filed several civil applications challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the filings were delayed and, after hearing, condoned the delay, restored the petitions to their original positions and allowed the civil applications. The petitioners then …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court order to restart the TB Sanatorium Hospital run by the Indian Red Cross Society in Ahmednagar and to decide service benefit claims of ex‑employees whose services were terminated due to the hospital's closure. The District …
The petitioners, non‑teaching employees of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools in Maharashtra, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14 March 2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 1 January 2024. They argued that …
The petitioner filed an RTI application for information on Primary/Secondary Ashram Schools, but the Public Information Officer directed him to approach each school separately and the petitioner did not receive the information. He appealed to the first appellate authority under Section 19(1) of the …
The petitioner, a civil surgeon, was transferred from Beed to Ahilyanagar and then, within a short period, to Udgir, which he claimed was a mid‑term transfer violating the Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfers Act. He filed an original application before the Maharashtra …
Vinod Anna Jadhav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Beed, to decide on a proposal he submitted on 06‑02‑2015. The petitioner alleged that the inaction violated his right to a timely …
The petitioner, Jitendra Balasaheb Jadhav, filed a writ petition challenging a 20 September 2021 order that rejected his application for the transfer of respondent No. 3. The petition was never circulated after filing, and the court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in prosecuting …
Akbar Khan Karim Khan filed Writ Petition No. 11590 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. During the proceedings, the …
The petitioner, Ajay Govindrao Surywanshi, filed a civil application (No.336 of 2024) and a writ petition (No.12304/2022) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The civil application was allowed in accordance with prayer clauses B and C, though the judgment does not detail the specific …
Madhukar Sudhakar Puri filed a civil writ petition (No. 1511 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the Union of India and others. The petition had been delayed, and the respondents raised objections. The Court, after hearing, decided to condone the delay and restored the writ …
The petitioner, Bhaskar Eknath Badak, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb him as a permanent Gram Rojgar Sevak. The Court examined whether temporary workers under the Gram Rojgar scheme acquire a right to permanent appointment. Relying on its earlier …
The petitioner, Ramamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, sought a court direction compelling the State of Maharashtra to permit the commencement of 8th standard classes for the academic year 2019‑2020, after its proposal was rejected by an unreasoned order dated 02‑05‑2018. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the State to acquire their lands as per proposals dated 26/03/2015 and to pay compensation. The respondents submitted an affidavit stating that the acquisition process is proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, with …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging actions of the Pharmacy Council of India. The court noted that, due to the passage of time, the petitions had become infructuous. No substantive merits were addressed. Consequently, the court disposed of all the writ petitions as infructuous.
Baban Murlidhar Patunkar filed a writ petition challenging an order dated page 150. The petitioner claimed a grievance concerning a writ property. While the petition was pending, a related civil suit was decided in the petitioner's favour, thereby redressing his grievance. The Court held that the …
The applicants, Subhash Tukappa Hirmukhe and others, filed a writ petition (No. 7512 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought reliefs specified in prayer clauses B and C, but the filing was delayed. The respondents …
The petitioners sought approval of their services, which was rejected by the State of Maharashtra on 16 May 2023 on the ground of a management dispute and pending submission of Schedule‑I. The petitioners later produced an order dated 27 May 2025 from the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Beed, …
Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent Gram Rojgar Sevaks. The Court noted that the petitioners were appointed only on a temporary scheme and had not been appointed to a …
Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure, who had been employed on a temporary Gram Rojgar Sevak scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent employees. The High Court examined whether a temporary appointment …
The Dnyan Sandeep Shikshan Sanstha, representing teachers and management, filed writ petitions against the Education Officer (Primary) of Z.P. Aurangabad and against Omprakash Sanjabrao Sawadatkar, alleging disputes related to their employment and administration. A third petition was filed by the …
The petitioner, Sanvar Baig Shabbir Baig, filed Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel D. K. Dagadkhair, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioner, Rajendra Raghunagh Majkuri, filed writ petition No. 4748 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mr. Syed Masood Chand, while the State was represented by Mr. A. V. …
The petitioner, Sayyad Sattar Sayyad Abbas (deceased) through his legal representatives, filed a civil application seeking relief under prayer clause B against the State of Maharashtra. The application alleged certain grounds (not detailed in the judgment) and requested the Court to permit a …
The petitioners, Trimbak Mahadev Markad and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 June 2022 issued by the State of Maharashtra. The challenge was premised on Clause‑3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016, which the petitioners alleged to be discriminatory and …
The petitioner, Shivjyoti Swayam Rojgaar Sanstha Dhule, filed writ petition No. 13342 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for several years, and by the time of hearing in March 2026, the …
The petitioner, Shivjyoti Swayam Rojgaar Sanstha Dhule, filed writ petition No. 13344 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. No substantive facts or relief sought are recorded in the judgment. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioners, Miss Shaista Anjum Syed Asger and others, filed writ petitions challenging the non-approval of their appointments as primary teachers. The Education Officer subsequently approved their appointments on 9 April 2026, rendering the petitions moot. The petitioners' counsel submitted a …
The petitioner, a landowner whose claim for compensation under the National Highways Act was pending as of 28 March 2008, sought solatium and interest on the compensation awarded for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India. The Court examined the directions issued in the Supreme …
The petitioner, Rajesh Chandramal Galani, filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, which laid down criteria for …
The petitioners, landowners whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, sought solatium, interest and interest on solatium on their compensation. The High Court examined the directions issued by the Supreme Court in National Highways Authority of India v. Tarsem Singh (Review Petition …
Petitioner Kailas Murlidhar Agrawal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking solatium and interest on compensation awarded for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The Court referred to a recent Supreme Court review order in NHAI v. Tarsem Singh, which laid down …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the State of Maharashtra to implement a 2017 Government Resolution/Circular requiring schools to prepare a new seniority list of teachers and to halt promotions based on the old list. They also asked for cancellation of promotions made since 2014 on the basis …
The petitioner, Almas Vahatuk Va Hamal Sahakari Sanstha, a cooperative labour society that has handled food‑grain work in Parbhani district since 2005, sought a writ to quash communications authorising work to another cooperative (Respondent No.5) and to direct the authorities to award work to it …
The petitioners, Zakir Ali and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The application primarily sought condonation of delay in filing the petition. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General of …
The petitioner, Shree Swami Services Labour and Security Contractor, was awarded a contract to collect garbage for the Jamner Municipal Council and performed the work in October‑November 2021, submitting bills for payment. Despite repeated requests, the respondent (Chief Officer of Jamner Municipal …
The petitioner, Almas Vahatuk Va Hamal Sahakari Sanstha, a cooperative labour society that has handled food grain work in Parbhani district since 2005, sought to quash communications and direct the allocation of work to it, alleging that the allocation to another cooperative, Shalimar Vahatuk Va …
The appellants, Dnyaneshwar and Bhagwan Gaddime, were convicted for murder and dowry death under Sections 302 and 498‑A IPC based primarily on two dying declarations of the victim, Mahadevi. The defence argued that the first declaration was recorded 18 hours after admission, was not in the victim's …
The petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner in the Backward Class Cell, was transferred to the post of Deputy Election Officer in Parbhani, but upon arrival the post was found to be non‑vacant, preventing him from joining. He approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal seeking a stay of the …
