Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
205 judgments · newest first · showing 201–205
The petitioners, non‑teaching employees of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools in Maharashtra, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14‑03‑2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 01‑01‑2024. They argued that the …
The petitioner, Pratapsinh Naraynsinh Thakur, was allotted a gharkul (a small dwelling) on a plot of land in Sonkhed, Nanded, and received compensation of Rs. 28,30,602 for the gharkul. He later claimed an additional compensation of Rs. 6,42,098, arguing that the compensation paid covered only the …
The petitioners, a group of primary Ashram schools, filed writ petitions seeking grant‑in‑aid similar to that granted to another institution. They relied on a Government Resolution dated 25‑05‑2021, which, however, stipulated that any such grant could be decided only after the Finance Department’s …
The petitioners, a group of primary Ashram schools, filed writ petitions seeking grant-in-aid comparable to that granted to Mauli Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Sanstha. They relied on a Government Resolution dated 25/05/2021, which, however, stipulated that any grant-in-aid decision could only be made after …
Petitioner Jagannath Bhanudas Mule filed a writ petition challenging a compensation order. The Respondent No.2 submitted a decision dated 18.06.2026 along with a cheque for Rs.3,36,08,065 and stated it would refer the dispute to the Railway Court and deposit the amount within four weeks. The learned …
