Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

NAVIN SINHA

37 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

NAZIR MOHAMEDversusJ. KAMALA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 51127 August 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the CPC concerning a suit for declaration of title and possession of a property. The High Court had entertained the appeals despite the absence of a substantial question of law, and had allowed the respondent's claim to possession while dismissing

GURJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2019 INSC 128126 November 2019Case Partly allowed

Gurjit Singh was convicted under Section 498-A IPC for dowry-related cruelty after his wife, Jaswinder Kaur, committed suicide within seven years of marriage. The High Court also convicted him under Section 306 IPC, invoking the presumption of abetment under Section 113-A of the Evidence Act. On appeal, the Supreme Cou

MOHD. INAMversusSANJAY KUMAR SINGHAL & ORS.

2020 INSC 44526 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mohd. Inam, challenged a vacancy declaration made by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer under Section 12(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, alleging that only his family members occupied the premises and therefore the vacancy provision was

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC.versusDR. NARENDER SONI AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.

2017 INSC 46925 May 2017Dismissed

The State of Haryana issued a notification on 5 May 2017 identifying "remote/difficult" areas for granting weightage in NEET PG admissions under Regulation 9(IV) of the Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000. The High Court set aside the notification, holding it was based on an arbitrary and hasty process, a

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusKRISHNA KUMAR & ORS.

2019 INSC 56223 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka implemented the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) scheme by upgrading certain primary schools to higher primary schools with an 8th standard. An Office Memorandum dated 7 April 2010 introduced clause 13 allowing teachers to apply for mutual transfers, subject to mutual consent and matching cadre and su

M/S. GRANULES INDIA LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 8223 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Granules India Ltd imported 96 tonnes of acetic anhydride in 1993 under an advance licence issued before 19 May 1992 and claimed exemption from customs duty under Notifications 203/1992 and 204/1992. The exemption was withdrawn by Notification 183/1993 dated 25 November 1993, but a clarificatory Notification 105/19

M. SRIKANTHversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.

2019 INSC 117221 October 2019Disposed off

The complainant alleged that a property inherited from her father was fraudulently transferred to her brother through a forged will and deed, and that the brother subsequently executed a lease to accused No.4, who sub‑leased it to HPCL. The complaint also implicated several other parties, but the High Court quashed the

TATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.versusSMT. SURESHWATI

2021 INSC 3220 January 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a claim by Smt. Sureshwati that her services as a clerk/assistant teacher in a private school turned government‑aided were illegally retrenched on 8 March 2006 without a disciplinary enquiry. The school contended that she had abandoned her post in July 1997 after marriage and had not been in continuo

RANA PRATAP SINGHversusVITTIYA EVAM LEKHA ADHIKARI, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER AND ORS.

2019 INSC 140818 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was appointed Junior Accounts Clerk on 21‑12‑1990 after a selection process conducted by a committee under the 1985 Rules and after calling names from the Employment Exchange. The promotion of a senior officer (Shiv Kumar Rai) was later cancelled, leading to the termination of the appellant's appointment,

RAJENDRA SINGH AND OTHERSversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 43818 June 2020Disposed off

The deceased, a housewife and her minor daughter, were passengers in a horse‑cart that was struck by a bus, resulting in their deaths. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but deducted 50% on the ground of contributory negligence, a deduction the High Court upheld. On appeal, the Supreme Court held t

UNITED BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITEDversusORCHID CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED AND ORS.

2018 INSC 3117 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court, hearing United Biotech Private Ltd's application, modified its earlier judgment dated 29 November 2017 concerning the interpretation of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The order substituted specific wording in paragraphs 13, 14 and 37 to correctly refer to the parties and the civil appeals

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusKAHLON @ JASMAIL SINGH KAHLON (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE NARINDER KAHLON GOSAKAN AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 40316 August 2021Case Partly allowed

The claimant suffered severe injuries in a motor accident in 1999 and filed a claim under Section 166(1)(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs.1,00,000, which the claimant appealed; he died in 2015 of causes unrelated to the accident, and his daughter was substituted as

MISHRA AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.]versusRAJ KUMAR ANAND

2019 INSC 36914 March 2019Dismissed

The respondent, Raj Kumar Anand, a Trained Graduate Teacher, was granted Assured Career Progression (ACP) and placed in an upgraded pay scale effective 10 August 2006 by an order dated 25 April 2008. After the 6th Central Pay Commission’s rules (Central Civil Service (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008) came into force on 29 Aug

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusBUNTY

2019 INSC 36814 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against a Division Bench order that had directed the issuance of an appointment order to Bunty, who had applied for the post of police constable. Bunty had cleared the recruitment tests, but the Screening Committee denied his appointment on the ground that he was involved in a crimi

MISHRA AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.]versusASHA SRIVASTAVA & ORS.

2019 INSC 19814 February 2019Dismissed

The respondent, a teacher appointed on probation at a privately managed primary school, sought approval of her appointment and later challenged her suspension and termination, which were effected without a departmental enquiry. The High Court initially dismissed her writ on the ground that the private school was not a

– CITIZENSHIP STATUSversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2019 INSC 20214 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners challenged Rule 5A(3) of the Bihar Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1955, which limited the number of candidates called for the final written examination to 10% of those who appeared in the preliminary test. They argued that the rule violated the Supreme Court's decision in Malik Mazha

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 33213 April 2018Matter referred to larger bench

The Tamil Nadu Medical Officers’ Association challenged the amendment to Regulation 9(4) and (8) of the Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, which allowed reservation of 50% of state‑quota seats for in‑service medical officers. The petitioners argued that such reservation exceeded the legislative competen

UMA SHANKAR & ORS.versusR. HANUMAIAH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS. & ORS.

2017 INSC 46312 May 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The land was acquired by the State in 1959 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and possession was taken in 1975. Subsequent resolutions sought to reconvey portions of the land to R. Hanumaiah, but the Supreme Court held in 2005 that once possession is taken, Section 48 cannot be used to de‑acquire or reconvey the land

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusDR. TONMOY MONDAL

2019 INSC 35212 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Tonmoy Mondal, a medical officer in West Bengal Health Services, applied for voluntary retirement under Rule 75(aaa) of the West Bengal Service Rules, 1971. The State declined his request on the ground of public interest, a decision later quashed by the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal. The High Court initially

RAJA RAMversusJAI PRAKASH SINGH AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 101511 September 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Raja Ram, claimed that his elderly father, aged over 80, was physically infirm and that the respondents, who cared for him, exercised undue influence to obtain a sale deed in their favour in 1970. The plaintiff alleged that the father's age, cataract, and limited mobility rendered him incapable of free c

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusK. P. S. RAGHUVANSHI & ORS.

2017 INSC 129411 May 2017Disposed off

DIG K.P.S. Raghuvanshi challenged the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) recommendation for his promotion to Inspector General of the Indian Coast Guard, alleging that the DPC was conducted under the newly issued Coast Guard Order (CGO) 02/09, which altered the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) criteria, and that th

ARUN SINGH & OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ANOTHER

2020 INSC 16310 February 2020Disposed off

The appellants were charged under Section 493 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly demanding dowry and for deceitful cohabitation. The complainant filed an FIR after a purported compromise between the parties, and the High Court dismissed the appellants' petition under Section 482

KALU ALIAS LAXMINARAYANversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 12187 November 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Kalu alias Laxminarayan, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife, who was found strangulated inside their home. The trial and High Courts held the death homicidal, though the High Court initially described it as hanging. The Supreme Court examined the forensic findings, the presence

G H RAGHUNATH PRASAD PANDEversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2018 INSC 3106 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a landlord, sought to resume four acres of land from tenants under the Mysore Land Reforms Act, 1961. A compromise deed dated 02‑03‑1970, recorded before the Munsiff/Tribunal, indicated that the respondents had already handed over possession of the land to the petitioner. The High Court held the petitio

CHATTAR SINGH & ORSversusMADHO SINGH & ORS.

2019 INSC 1506 February 2019Dismissed

The plaintiffs, villagers, sued to declare that a 72‑bigha parcel recorded as ‘Charnoi’ (common grazing land) vested in the State under the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951, and could not be claimed by the ex‑Zamindar’s heirs. The ex‑Zamindar’s father had earlier obtained a Bhumiswami title under Section 5(f

FAINUL KHANversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 11274 October 2019Dismissed

The appellants, including Fainul Khan, were convicted under IPC sections 302/149, 323/149 and 147 for participating in an unlawful assembly that resulted in the murder of a deceased and injuries to two eyewitnesses. They challenged the conviction on three grounds: the charge under section 147 was framed against only fo

RAVI SETIAversusMADAN LAL AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 11244 October 2019Dismissed

Ravi Setia filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 10‑11‑1989, seeking execution of the sale deed on 30‑04‑1990. The trial court held that the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform, relying solely on a certificate from the Sub‑Registrar that he was present on the said date, despite the defe

M/S. CHEMINOVA INDIA LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2021 INSC 3814 August 2021Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellants, manufacturers of the insecticide Trizophos 40% EC, were charged with misbranding after laboratory analysis showed the active ingredient was only 34.70%. Samples were taken on 10 February 2011, sent to the Insecticide Testing Laboratory, Ludhiana, and the first analysis report was received on 14 March 20

M/S CHEMINOVA INDIA LIMITED & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2021 INSC 3814 August 2021Case Partly allowed

M/s Cheminova India Ltd, a pesticide manufacturer, and its former Managing Director were charged under the Insecticides Act, 1968 for misbranding insecticide products after laboratory tests showed lower active ingredient than labeled. The State of Punjab filed a complaint alleging offences under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 1

NIRMALA KOTHARIversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2020 INSC 2634 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's husband owned a Hyundai car insured for Rs.5,00,000, which met with a fatal accident. The insurer denied the claim, alleging that the driver’s licence was fake and could not be verified with the licensing authority. The consumer forums allowed the claim, but the insurer appealed, contending a breach of

BRIJESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSHARDABAI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 11041 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Matadin, filed a suit in 1990 claiming adverse possession of land based on Khasra entries from 1960‑61, asserting continuous possession for over 30 years. The original owners had sold the land to Urmila Devi on 11‑Oct‑1972, and her name appears in the Khasra in blue ink for subsequent years, while the pl

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search