Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
2537 judgments · newest first · showing 2401–2537
The petitioner, Uday Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 423 litres of Nepali liquor from a vehicle, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely a passer‑by and not the owner of the …
Vishal Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with the seizure of 35 litres of country‑made liquor from a motorcycle, alleged to violate Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, was not the owner of the motorcycle, and no …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 70 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from a plastic sac outside his house, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no liquor was …
The petitioner, Madan Kamat, was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of 2 kg of ganja, alleged under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act. He claimed false implication, had no prior criminal record, and no incriminating material was found on his person. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Md. Azad, was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of a pistol and a live cartridge from co-accused persons, and was charged under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that no arms were found in his personal possession and that he was …
The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after a loaded country‑made pistol was recovered. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no weapon was found in his conscious possession, and that there was no compliance …
The petitioner, Sunil Chaudhary, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycles, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after a pistol and cartridges were recovered from a polythene bag he allegedly threw. He claimed false implication, stating that no weapon was found in his conscious possession and …
The petitioner, Anish Kumar, was arrested as the driver of a pick‑up vehicle from which 1080 litres of liquor was seized, alleged to be offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no ownership of the vehicle, no knowledge of …
The petitioner, Unajesh Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 260.1 liters of liquor recovered from a jute sack. He claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that …
Nitesh Kumar was arrested in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, after a loaded pistol and ammunition were recovered. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and that no arms were found in his …
Aman Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 160 litres of country‑made liquor. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that he had no …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought bail in a case (Barun P.S. Case No. 259 of 2025) involving alleged theft of a motorcycle under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the motorcycle was stolen by unknown persons, but the petitioner was not …
The petitioner, Suresh Sah, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, had purchased the motorcycle from a third …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 100 litres of illicit liquor in an e‑rickshaw. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the contraband, …
Prince Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged to have occurred on 26 October 2025 and charged under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that four unidentified assailants on motorcycles robbed an informant of jewellery and a mobile phone. The …
The petitioner, Bijesh Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered as Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 766 of 2025, involving alleged offences under Sections 305(b) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 concerning a stolen motorcycle. The prosecution alleged that the motorcycle was stolen by …
The petitioner, Prabhat Ranjan, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol and two live cartridges. He claimed innocence, argued that no incriminating material was found in his conscious possession, and …
The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Saurabh Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 46 litres of country-made liquor on a motorcycle. They claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, a bus conductor, was arrested after 105.84 litres of liquor were recovered from his bus in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no knowledge of the liquor and no incriminating material was found in his …
The petitioner, Kshitij Raj, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle from which 150 litres of liquor was seized, alleged to be in violation of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, was not the owner of the car, and …
Anand Manjhi, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of 360 litres of country‑made liquor from his vehicle, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that …
The petitioner, Nihal Kumar Yadav, was arrested on 27 October 2025 after 126 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, although he claimed he was merely a passerby and not the owner. He argued that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that the arrest was based solely on …
The petitioner, Sandeep Rai, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1,442.88 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a truck. He contended that he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the contraband, asserting that no …
The petitioner, Ratish Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 360 litres of Nepali liquor and charged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged possession of the …
Somar Ravidas, a driver, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 120.240 litres of liquor. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no liquor was found in his possession and he had no knowledge of the goods, and …
The petitioner, Rekha Devi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 100 litres of liquor were recovered from an open area behind her house. She claimed innocence, stating that no liquor was found in her possession, she has no criminal …
The petitioner, Uday Kumar, was arrested after 100 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, no incriminating material was found in his possession, and he was …
The petitioner, Arvind Yadav, was arrested in connection with an excise case (PS Case No. 910 of 2025) for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor, alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no …
The petitioner, Ujjwal Kant Singh, was arrested as a passenger in a vehicle from which 195 litres of country-made liquor were seized, leading to charges under Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the contraband, was not the …
The petitioner, Dudheshwar Singh, was arrested after 100 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of incriminating material in his personal possession, and that …
The petitioner, Sardar Nonia, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from a bicycle. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered, but the petitioner claimed innocence, stating he neither …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested after 141.24 liters of liquor were recovered from his joint house and charged under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Bablu Sahni, was arrested for alleged possession of 30 litres of liquor recovered from a plastic box near a riverbank, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of or involvement with the recovered liquor, that the …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 87.5 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He claimed innocence, arguing that no liquor was found in his personal possession and that the …
Mukesh Giri was arrested after 312 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycles, no incriminating material was found in his possession, he had no …
The petitioner, Md. Raja, was arrested in connection with an excise case alleging possession of 12.5 litres of liquor recovered from a jute sack, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating no incriminating material was found in his possession and that …
Petitioner Rajeev Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged possession of 105 litres of liquor, two motorcycles and other articles, and charged under Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Mahto, was arrested in connection with an excise case where 60 litres of country‑made liquor was recovered from a jute sack. He asserted that he was falsely implicated, noting that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that the recovery occurred in an …
The petitioner, Ram Kumar, was arrested after 9.54 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle and was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the motorcycle, no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that …
Mukesh Kumar Sah was arrested as the driver of a pick‑up vehicle from which 1,575 litres of liquor were seized, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was not the owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge of the …
The petitioner, Dula Devi, was arrested in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 769C2 of 2025 for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 2 litres of liquor were said to have been recovered from her. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that no …
The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 130 litres of liquor, violating Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the goods, and that no …
Munna Mahto was arrested in connection with a case alleging the recovery of 240 litres of liquor from an open area near a river, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found in his …
Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 330 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from a vehicle. The petitioner contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle, that no incriminating material …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Saw, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 80 litres of liquor were recovered from his jointly occupied house. He contended that he had no direct possession of the liquor, no criminal antecedents, and …
Chhotu Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 290 litres of country‑made liquor from two motorcycles, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a passer‑by, not the owner of the vehicles, and that …
Rikki Kumar, a driver, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 120 litres of country-made liquor from an e‑rickshaw, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession, and had no …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 97.740 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from a room in the house he was renting. He claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was found in a shared rented …
The petitioners – three residents of Lilari village – applied for bail in an excise case (No. 1632 of 2025) arising from the recovery of 65 litres of country‑made liquor near a river, alleged to be offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged the …
Wakil Rai was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 185 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from a boat. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the liquor, no criminal antecedent, and that the recovery was …
Mosafir Paswan was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 126.45 litres of liquor were recovered from an open place. The petitioner claimed he had no possession of the liquor, no incriminating material was found on him, and he was falsely …
Randhir Kumar Ray was arrested in connection with Chapra Rail PS Case No. 222 of 2025 for alleged possession of 45 liters of foreign liquor recovered from a bag, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Md. Ahasan Alam, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 37.71 liters of liquor recovered at Chapra Railway Station. He contended that he was merely present at the station to board a train and had no …
The petitioners, Santosh Kumar and Prince Kumar, were arrested in connection with an Excise case (No. 464 of 2025) for alleged possession of 270 litres of Nepali liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They claimed they were merely the driver and passenger of the …
The petitioners, Rohit Kumar and Bikky Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 24.99 liters of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. They claimed innocence, stating they were merely passersby and that no incriminating …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 1,143 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from a pickup van, but the petitioner claimed he was merely …
Santosh Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with the recovery of 285.6 litres of liquor from a car, facing charges under Sections 30(a), 32(2), 41(1) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle, that no …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He claimed innocence, stating he neither owned the motorcycle nor had any involvement with the …
The petitioner, Rintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that 255.90 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a tempo, charging him under Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely the driver and had no knowledge of the …
The petitioners, Shri Narayan Ram and Amar Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 67 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from their jointly occupied house. They contended that they had no conscious possession of the …
Petitioner Virendra Tiwari filed a contempt application alleging that the State officials willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 26 September 2024 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14689 of 2024. The State filed a show‑cause response, submitting that the District Land Acquisition …
Shubham Devi filed an application seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Chandan Kumar, alleging that he was misusing the bail privilege by threatening her and her family. The High Court examined the claim in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana, which …
Shubham Devi filed an application seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Sintu Mandal in a criminal miscellaneous case, alleging that he was misusing the bail privilege by threatening her and her family. The High Court examined whether such allegations, without supporting material or …
Shubham Devi filed an application seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Vijay Mandal on 2 April 2024, alleging that he was misusing the bail privilege by threatening her and her family. The High Court examined whether such allegations, without supporting material or specific bail …
Petitioner Sunny Kumar filed a contempt application against several State officials alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 30‑09‑2024 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15010 of 2024. The opposite parties filed a show‑cause response stating that the Circle Officer, Mokama, had considered …
Petitioner Bachan Jha filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, including various officials of the Bihar government, willfully disobeyed the judgment dated 23-07-2024 in C.W.J.C. No. 10916 of 2024. The petition sought initiation of contempt proceedings for non‑compliance with that …
The petitioner, Mohan Singh, sought regular bail in a Special POCSO case (No. 258 of 2023) arising from a Mahila P.S. case involving offences under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. An earlier bail application was rejected on 5 December 2024 due to the gravity of the …
The appellants, Ram Nagina Paswan and Vikram Kumar, were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act in Nawada Muffasil P.S. Case No. 372 of 2024, and their bail applications were rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. They appealed, contending …
The appellant, Dipak Kumar, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge that denied his bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant contended that he was falsely implicated, that …
The Patna High Court heard an appeal by Raj Kumar Paswan and Mukesh Paswan against the denial of bail by an Exclusive Special Judge in a case filed under the SC/ST Act and several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The appellants argued that they were falsely implicated, …
The appellant, Praveen Kumar, appealed against the denial of bail in a case involving charges under IPC sections 302, 201, 34 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The High Court noted that the appellant had been in custody since 27 April 2024 and that only three of seven witnesses had been …
Munna Ram and Mina Devi, accused under Sections 420, 372, 373, 376, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, applied for bail after being in judicial custody since 23 June 2024. Their earlier bail plea was rejected, and the trial is presently at the prosecution‑evidence stage with three of …
The petitioner, Naresh Ram Turi, was arrested in connection with a case registered at Gaya Mahila Police Station (Case No. 41 of 2024) for offences under Section 64(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail, claiming he …
The petitioner, Bhagirath Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case (Jhajha PS Case No. 140 of 2024) involving offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 328, 304B and 34. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected by the High Court on 25.03.2025, citing the gravity of the offences. The …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, sought regular bail in a case (S.T. No. 619 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This was his second bail application after the High Court had earlier rejected his plea on 20‑11‑2024. The court noted that six of seven …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 21(c), 22(c), 29 and 35 of the NDPS Act, after being in judicial custody since 24‑10‑2024. The State opposed bail, highlighting the seizure of 720 litres of Eskuf cough syrup and 540 kg …
The petitioner, Satyendra Sah, was arrested and has been in judicial custody since 21 July 2024 for offences under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 96, 3(5), 103(1) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for bail, but an earlier order on 17 January 2025 rejected regular bail due to the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case (PS No.940 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 8(c), 21(c), 22(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This was his second bail application after the Patna High Court had earlier rejected his …
The petitioner, Hare Ram Mahto, was charged under Sections 304(B) and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for a case registered in 2023. He had been in custody since 31‑12‑2023 and had previously been denied regular bail. Counsel argued that six of eight witnesses had been examined and that continued …
The petitioner, Chhotelal Ram, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, after police recovered 307.43 kg of ganja from the house of co‑accused Shyamlal Bind. The petitioner contended that he was …
Surendra Rai was arrested on 29-08-2023 in connection with a case under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that the trial had not concluded, ten of eleven witnesses had been examined, and continued detention violated his fundamental right …
Niraj Kumar was arrested in September 2024 in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier denial, arguing that his prolonged pre‑trial custody violated his …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 363, 366 and 366-A of the Indian Penal Code and has been in judicial custody since 28 April 2024. He filed a second bail application after an earlier bail request was denied. The trial is at an advanced stage with two …
The petitioner, Bibhishan Tanti, was arrested in connection with offences under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. He applied for regular bail for the second time after his earlier bail plea was rejected. The trial court report indicated that all …
Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 394 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier been denied bail and, after remaining in judicial custody since November 2023, filed a second regular bail petition. The trial has …
Anil Sah was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has been in judicial custody since 30 July 2023. He filed a second bail petition after an earlier rejection, arguing that he has been detained without …
The petitioner, Sashi Ranjan Morya, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 331(3), 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This was his second bail application after the High Court had earlier rejected his request on 24.03.2025. The trial court had framed …
Kundan Mahto was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 27(3) of the Arms Act for a murder case. He has been in judicial custody since 10 September 2023 and filed a second bail application after the first was rejected. The trial court report showed that 12 …
The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a case registered as Sare P.S. Case No. 196 of 2023. He had earlier applied for bail, which was rejected on the basis of his own confessional statement. The petitioner has been in judicial …
Raushan Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC sections 302, 120(B) and 34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since July 7, 2022, and earlier the High Court had rejected his regular bail. The petitioner argued that only seven of the fifteen …
Hari Charan Yadav, charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail after being in judicial custody since 5 February 2025. This was his second bail application; the first was rejected. The trial has examined four of ten charge‑sheet …
The appellant, Ranjeet Singh, was charged under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for a murder case (PS Case No. 401 of 2024). He had been in judicial custody since June 2024 and filed an appeal against the trial court’s order …
Sanjay Singh, accused of offences under IPC sections 341, 447, 302, 307, 504/34 and Arms Act section 27, has been in judicial custody since 17‑10‑2023. He filed a second bail petition after an earlier bail denial. The court noted that the trial is underway with two of nine witnesses examined and may …
The petitioner, Md Nasim, was charged under Section 143(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Section 14 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial. …
The petitioner, Dularchand Kumar, sought regular bail in a case under Sections 103, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This was his second bail application after the High Court had earlier rejected his plea. The court noted that four of six charge‑sheet witnesses had already …
Arjun Singh was arrested in August 2023 and charged under Sections 363, 364, 365, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After a prior regular bail application was rejected, he filed a second bail petition, arguing that ten prosecution witnesses had already been examined and the trial was far …
Golden Das, the petitioner, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, after being in custody since January 2025. An earlier bail application was rejected, but the petitioner argued that the trial was not yet concluded and continued detention …
Shiv Kumar, accused under Sections 20(b)II(c), 23, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act, applied for regular bail in a case registered in 2022. This was his second bail application after the Patna High Court rejected his earlier petition on the ground that the contraband seized exceeded commercial quantity. …
Brajesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an excise case in Nawada and charged under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii) and 20(c) of the NDPS Act. He applied for regular bail, but the Patna High Court had earlier rejected his bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband exceeded the commercial …
Arun Kumar Singh applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This was his second bail application after the Patna High Court had earlier rejected his plea on 24.01.2025, citing his criminal antecedents and the …
Jay Jay Sahni was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC 302), criminal conspiracy (IPC 120B) and illegal possession of arms (Arms Act 27). He has been in custody since 2 January 2024 and earlier bail was denied. The petitioner argued that continued pre‑trial detention violates his …
The petitioner, Basant Kumar, sought regular bail in a case under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, having been in custody since 7 November 2024. The High Court had earlier rejected bail, noting the recovery of contraband beyond commercial quantity and directing speedy trial. On the …
The petitioners, Md. Anwarul and Md. Pinku, were arrested in connection with offences under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Their earlier applications for regular bail were rejected, with the court allowing a renewal after six months. They filed a second bail …
Guddu Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 23 August 2023, and two earlier applications for regular bail were rejected, with the court allowing a re‑application after three months. On …
The petitioner, Vishwanath Ram, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. He applied for bail, arguing that he had been in judicial custody since December 2024 without justification. The court noted that a prior bail application had been rejected and that there were …
Arjun Yadav was arrested in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, and has been in custody since 24‑10‑2024. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected by the Patna High Court on the ground of the seriousness of the alleged criminal conspiracy. …
The petitioners, three accused persons, applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder, attempt to murder, and other violent crimes. Their earlier bail applications had been rejected by the Patna High Court on the grounds of the …
The petitioner, Mahesh Mandal, was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 304B, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, having been in judicial custody since 15 June 2024, and claimed that only five of seven witnesses had been examined. The …
The petitioner, Chhotu Ram, was charged under IPC sections 302, 120B, 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26, 27, 35. He had been in judicial custody since 13 July 2024 and earlier sought regular bail, which was rejected on 6 May 2025 because of the material in the case diary and his nine prior …
Manish Rai was arrested in connection with a case involving kidnapping, kidnapping for ransom, criminal conspiracy and common intention under IPC sections 364, 365, 120(B) and 34. An earlier bail application was rejected because he had assured the informant of returning the child, indicating …
Md. Ajmuddin was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 196, 197(1), 197(2), 223 and 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected, with the court allowing a fresh application after six months. The petitioner argued that three charge‑sheet …
The petitioner, Raju Kanu, was implicated in a narcotics case after a co-accused, Dharmendra Ram, disclosed that the heroin seized from him was procured from the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the disclosure was inadmissible, he was under medical treatment, and no independent evidence linked …
Kumari Pammi Choudhary filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. Subsequently, she sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application, citing a change in the stage of the case. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Mohit Agarwal, made the …
The petitioner, Kumari Susma Choudhary, filed an application before the High Court of Patna. She sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application due to a change in the stage of the case. The issue before the Court was whether such permission could be granted at that point in the …
Manish Agrawal filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 59498 of 2024) seeking to withdraw the proceedings. He approached the Patna High Court requesting permission to withdraw and to move the matter before the appropriate forum. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Sunil Kumar Singh, …
The petitioners sought quashing of a Judicial Magistrate’s order of cognizance dated 08‑05‑2024 in a complaint alleging assault, robbery and related offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 379, 504 and 34. The complaint alleged that the petitioners attacked the complainant with lathis and stole a gold …
The petitioner, Kumar Shivam Shekhar, filed a petition seeking quash of the order of cognizance dated 11 July 2024 and the charge‑sheet in a case arising from a complaint that he had participated in assault, intimidation and theft on 25 March 2021. The petitioner argued that the dispute was …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from the Paswan family, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash the FIR registered against them. While the application was pending, cognizance was taken by the trial court, changing the stage of the criminal proceedings. The …
The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, had filed an application in the Criminal Miscellaneous proceeding No. 48147 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. During the course of the proceedings, the stage of the case changed, prompting the petitioner to seek permission to withdraw the pending application. Counsel …
Harendra Singh filed an application seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 24‑10‑2021 in CIS No. 373 of 2019 under the SC/ST Act. He later approached the Patna High Court requesting permission to withdraw that application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the petitioner's request, …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 60823 of 2024 arising from a 2018 case. During the pendency of the matter, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application, citing a change in the stage of the case. The Court …
The petitioners, Rahul Kumar and relatives, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Gajendra Nath Ojha, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by Mr. Choubey Jawahar, opposed the …
The petitioner, Samir Kumar, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.21144 of 2023) arising from a 2019 complaint in Nalanda district. The petitioner later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the …
Krishna Singh filed a petition in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2093 of 2024 and Manbodh Kumar Singh et al. filed a petition in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29941 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. Both petitioners jointly sought the Court's permission to withdraw their pending applications. The …
The petitioners, senior logistics officials of Dabur India Ltd., filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash FIR No. 128 of 2025 registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that the dispute with the informant, …
The petitioners Arvind Chaudhary, his wife Juli Devi and Sunaina Devi sought to quash a complaint filed by informant Sabo Devi alleging assault, outraging modesty and theft under IPC sections 323, 379 and 504. The petitioners argued that the complaint was a retaliatory ‘counter‑blast’ filed after an …
Krishna Singh filed a petition in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2093 of 2024 and Manbodh Kumar Singh et al. filed a petition in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29941 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. Both petitioners jointly sought the Court's permission to withdraw their pending applications. The …
The petitioner Kaushlendra Kumar was arrested after a breath analyzer indicated 65 mg of alcohol per 100 ml, leading to an FIR under Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner challenged the FIR, arguing that the breath test alone, without corroborative blood or urine …
The petitioners, four individuals from Jamalpur village, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. After being acquitted in the underlying criminal case, they sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The petitioners …
Petitioner Sujit Kumar filed two separate applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash FIRs registered in Civil Lines Police Station (Case No. 190 of 2024) and in Civil Line Police Station (Case No. 353 of 2024) which alleged offences under IPC Sections 363, 365 …
The petitioners filed two separate applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash FIRs registered at Civil Lines Police Station, Gaya (Case No.190 of 2024 and Case No.353 of 2024). The first application was withdrawn after the court had taken cognizance, and the …
The petition filed by Shakil Ahmad Ata sought quashing of an order dated 18‑12‑2024 that took cognizance of offences under Sections 504 and 506 IPC for alleged threats and assault that occurred in May 2015. The High Court examined whether the magistrate could lawfully take cognizance after the …
The petitioners, including Sampat Kumar and others, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash a discharge order dated 13‑11‑2024 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge‑XVII, Bhagalpur in S.T. Case No. 405 of 2024. The case involved offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, …
The petitioner Renu Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a magistrate's order that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 506 IPC based on a complaint alleging dowry‑related harassment and threats. The …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Hira Lal Mahto, filed an application in the High Court of Patna in a criminal miscellaneous matter. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application and to file a fresh one with the necessary documents. The Court considered …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged killing of a deceased person. The prosecution alleged murder, while the petitioner’s counsel argued that the death was …
