Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
409 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The applicant, Sama Bano, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming that he was charged under Section 137(2) of the BNS, a cognizable but bailable offense. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected, stating that anticipatory bail is …
The applicants, Mustakeem and Smt. Bhoori, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging that they administered a poisonous substance to the victim. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC …
The applicant, Sachin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 110, 352 and 115(2) of the B.N.S. Act, claiming false implication and asserting that the injuries to parties on both sides were mutual. …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 74, 115(2) and 351(2) of the BNSS, claiming fear of arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the offences do not attract a punishment of more than seven years and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 filed by Kunj Bihari Sharan. The State opposed, highlighting an undisclosed prior case (Case Crime No. 327 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 307, 323, 452 and 506 IPC. The court held that the applicant’s …
The applicant, Ompal Sharma, was named among twelve accused in a case involving assault causing non‑life‑threatening injuries to three victims. He had no prior criminal record and had earlier obtained interim protection from arrest in a writ petition, which was later dismissed. The applicant sought …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 61(2), 316(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in Crime No.196 of 2026. The State’s Additional Government Advocate objected, arguing that the alleged offences do not attract a punishment exceeding seven years and that …
The applicant, Mubarik, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 103 of 2024) involving alleged NDPS offences under Sections 8, 18 and 29. He claimed false implication, noting that the co-accused Nadeem was caught with 500 grams of opium and that his …
Rohit Saini filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the application, the charge against him was altered to Sections 105 and 190 of the Indian Penal Code (BNS). Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the pending bail …
Ramcharan @ Kuddan was arrested and subsequently filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 6670 of 2026). The applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been taken into custody, rendering the anticipatory bail …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Archana Devi under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 177 of 2026) where she was alleged to have threatened an informant. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, had no role …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (No. 420 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The State’s Additional Government Advocate argued that anticipatory bail was not maintainable because the alleged offences did not …
The applicants, Rajesh Agarwal @ Bablu and two others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8656 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sanjay Srivastava, subsequently informed the court that the …
The applicant, Md. Babu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.259 of 2016) filed under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. He feared arrest and sought interim protection to appear before the trial …
The applicant, Neeraj Jaiswal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) after having already been granted regular bail by the trial court. The applicant's counsel argued that the anticipatory bail petition had become redundant and should be …
The applicant, Afsar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No.144 of 2026) involving offences under various sections of the B.N.S. He argued that he was falsely implicated as his name does not appear in the FIR or injured witnesses' …
The applicant, Rahul alias Prem Shankar, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in connection with charges under IPC sections 74, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in case No. 766 of 2025. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the …
The applicant, Ganesh Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. in a case alleging assault under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 3(5). He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the FIR was lodged by the injured party who named him and two others, and …
The applicant, Rameshchandra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only case shown against him in the …
The applicants, Suaib Khan and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 132 and 121(1) of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest. The State, represented by the Advocate General, objected, arguing that the alleged …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest. He also sought interim protection to appear before the trial court and apply for regular bail. The State did not oppose the prayer. …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Ashok Kumar, who feared arrest in a session case involving alleged offences under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 16 and 17 of the Protection of …
The applicant, Shani @ Avneesh Rajbhar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 211 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 304 and 126(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed false implication arising from …
The petitioners Shyam Kumar and two others filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected, noting that the applicants had multiple prior criminal cases which were not disclosed as required by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kunan Urf Kunal under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 0171 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing a five‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of medical evidence, and evidence of a consensual extra‑marital …
Avdhesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in a case where charge‑sheet had already been filed for offences under IPC s.498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act s.3/4. The learned Attorney‑General objected that the offences were not punishable with imprisonment …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yogeshwar Jaiswal in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31641 of 2026, seeking release in a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 111(2)(b), 317(4) and 3(5) of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, stating that the FIR was …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by 64‑year‑old retired employee Sudhadevi Srivastava, who feared arrest in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 29,93,943 along with 12 co‑accused. The alleged amount had been deposited and no actual loss was claimed; the receipt of …
The applicant, Munabbar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Attorney General highlighted that the applicant had nine prior criminal cases, contradicting the applicant's affidavit claiming no similar history. Confronted with this discrepancy, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Yashapal Chaudhary under CrPC provisions in a case involving alleged offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3). The FIR alleged that the accused used a country‑made firearm to shoot at two …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(2) and 340(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 in a property fraud case. The applicants, Akram Ali alias Bhambu and Mahboob Ahmad, were not named in the FIR and were described as marginal witnesses to an …
The applicant, Ankur, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Crime No. 360 of 2026. He claimed the FIR was false, asserting that the incident involved no injury and that a co‑accused was …
Shamim applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 after a charge sheet was filed. The A.G. argued that the alleged offences (IPC s.420, 406, 506) do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there is no risk of arrest. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Susheel Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC and the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, where he alleged false implication in a case involving two base cases in a gang chart. The applicant had no prior …
The applicant, Meraj, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 after a charge sheet was lodged. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there was no fear of arrest. The applicant’s counsel …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected that the applicant had not disclosed his complete criminal antecedents as mandated by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. The applicant's …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rani Devi, who was accused of misappropriating a family pension of Rs. 20,32,771 and facing charges under various IPC sections, CrPC Section 482, and IT Act Section 66(D). The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, had …
The applicant, Abhishek Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. After hearing, he sought to withdraw the application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The State opposed the request, but the learned Additional Government …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sabir under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, in a case involving mutual violence that resulted in injuries to eleven persons. The applicant argued he had no criminal antecedents and that no specific role was assigned to him, citing …
The applicant, Sujit Kumar Ghosh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a charge sheet was filed. The Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences, punishable with less than seven years’ imprisonment, did not create a risk of arrest. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sudama Pandey in a 2019 case involving alleged misappropriation of food grains under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 120B and 34 of the IPC. Pandey contended that he was a fair‑price shop dealer, the FIR was lodged after a …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No. 380 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the same Act. The Attorney General objected, contending that the offences do …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants, Zeeshan and Gulistana, claimed they were falsely implicated and that …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before …
The applicants Nitin Kumar and three others were charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case pending before the Bijnor court. They filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482, which the Assistant Government Advocate contested on the ground that …
Vinay Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a charge under Section 337 of the B.N.S. The Attorney General objected, arguing that the offence does not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, the charge‑sheet had already been …
Onkar Sahai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences do not attract imprisonment exceeding seven years, a …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for Sudhir Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and certain provisions of the …
The applicants, Ravi Kumar and Danveer, entered into an agreement to issue a series of cheques to the informant, but the informant lodged an FIR alleging criminal offences despite the agreement. The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023, claiming the dispute was …
Arjun Singh, charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 427 IPC and Section 4 of the Government Property Damages Act, had been absconding since 2004 and earlier obtained a three‑week interim protection under Section 528 CrPC, which he failed to act upon. He subsequently filed an anticipatory …
The applicant, Anas, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where a charge sheet had been filed against him for cheating under Section 413 IPC, in addition to earlier charges under Sections 411 and 414 IPC. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted …
The applicant, Arun Babu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 230 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 331(4) and 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. He is the son of the informant, who is …
The applicant, Abhishek, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 373 of 2026. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before the concerned court. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit @ Jaihind under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a FIR alleging his involvement in a gang that promised government jobs for money. The applicant’s name appeared only in the confessional statements …
The applicant, Parasnath Kushwaha, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under IPC Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) relating to a disputed sale deed. The first bail application was rejected because the applicant failed to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ram Kumar and five others in a case where a FIR, lodged three days after the alleged incident, accused them of assaulting a village Pradhan and his brother. The petitioners argued that the injuries were not life‑threatening, the FIR …
The applicant, Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving mutual assault between two parties where 23 persons were named in the FIR. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role assigned, and possessed no …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Manoj and two others under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.259 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicants claimed false implication, noting a 15‑day delay in filing the …
The applicant, Jugendra @ Chhote, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No.168 of 2026. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nadeem Khan under CrPC Section 482 in connection with a FIR alleging his participation in a large-scale protest that resulted in public property damage. The FIR named 25 individuals and 1,700 unnamed persons, but the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Mishra under Section 482 CrPC in a case where he was named in the FIR for allegedly threatening an informant, while the principal assault charge was against his brother. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated …
The applicant, Ajay Parmar, sought anticipatory bail in a case where his father, a co-accused, had allegedly sold property to an informant and deposited part of the consideration in Ajay's account. The informant later filed an affidavit stating that the sale deed had been executed in favour of his …
The applicant, Akash Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He asserted that he was falsely implicated, noting that only a single base case appears against him in the gang …
Tasveer Ahmad Ali applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482, claiming fear of arrest in a criminal case involving IPC offences. The State opposed, arguing the offences do not carry imprisonment exceeding seven years, a charge‑sheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest, …
The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The first applicant, Kumail Abbas, had already been arrested, rendering his application infructuous, and it was dismissed. The second applicant, Hasan Raza, sought anticipatory …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Asha Yadav and two other teachers under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC relating to alleged embezzlement of grant money from a madarsa. The …
The applicant, Pankaj Gopal, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant’s counsel, Dhruva Dixit, subsequently moved the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 324 of 2013) involving offences under Sections 419, 420 and 468 of the IPC. The applicant sought relief to avoid arrest and asked for …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Yash (applicant No.1) in a case involving alleged violence between two rival groups. The FIR named twelve accused and six to seven unknown persons, but no specific role was assigned to the applicant, …
Ratan Raj Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, which was rejected by the Sessions Judge. He then sought permission to appear before the concerned court and apply for regular bail, requesting protection from any coercive action during the interim. The State opposed the request, …
The applicant, Golden @ Ehsan Ahmad, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after being falsely implicated in an assault case where he was not named in the FIR. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant's name appeared in injured parties' statements and citing his prior criminal …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Pushpendra Kumar, who feared arrest in a case involving alleged manipulation of electronic weighing machines and misappropriation of sugarcane. The applicant was not named in the FIR, though co‑accused Bittu …
Aman Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in Crime No.0380 of 2026, fearing arrest. The State objected, arguing that the alleged offences do not attract a punishment exceeding seven years and that safeguards under Section 35(3) of the BNSS and Supreme Court rulings …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Jashoda Devi, who feared arrest in a family‑dispute case involving alleged assault on Padma Verma and Sridevi. The FIR named six persons and alleged offences under …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Vikas @ Muddu, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 109, 115, 351, 352, 117 and 3 of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which had earlier been rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge under the POCSO Act. They prayed for permission to appear before the concerned court and apply for regular bail, …
The applicant, Azam, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest after his name appeared in the confessional statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 211 g of heroin. The applicant’s earlier bail …
The Allahabad High Court entertained a second anticipatory bail application filed by Shadab under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a matter arising under Sections 3 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a murder case where she was alleged to have thrown brickbats causing fatal head injuries to the deceased. The FIR named six accused, but two were dropped; the applicant contended she was merely present and had no prior criminal …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit Kumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 195 of 2026 alleging false promise of marriage and related offences under the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely …
The applicant, a Branch Manager of UP Gramin Bank, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case alleging misappropriation of funds from 51 bank accounts, with charges under Sections 420, 120B and 409 of the IPC. He contended that the co‑accused siphoned the …
The applicant, Bhojraj, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a FIR alleging firing on an informant, a case with no injury. The applicant argued he was falsely implicated, had no prior conviction, and only one pending case. The informant’s counsel …
The applicant, Mohd. Tahir @ Tehrir, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 465 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109, 127(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC, alleging assault causing serious injury. The first bail application had been rejected. The applicant …
The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application filed by Rohit Tiwari @ Gore against the State of U.P. The application was heard before Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla. No detailed facts or legal arguments were recorded in the short order. The court allowed the bail application, referring to …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail applications filed by Satyam Yadav and Rohit Tiwari @ Gore in a case involving alleged assault at a liquor shop, where the victims suffered injuries, including a fracture to the parietal bone. The applicants claimed false implication and argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harisankar (Sonu), who had been in custody since 3 February 2026 in a case (Crime No. 29 of 2026) under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating he was the informant and that his wife, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshul in a rape case (Crime No.56 of 2025). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS did not allege rape or sexual assault against him, and that the primary accused Kapil had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gufran, who has been in custody since 16 January 2026 in a case under Sections 137(2), 87 and 142 of the B.N.S. The applicant alleged false implication in an alleged abduction of a victim, claiming the victim had eloped with his brother and that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail applications filed by Arjun and Raj Baisala Alias Raja in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12714 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 29 of 2026. The applicants argued they were falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no criminal antecedents, while …
The applicant, Raj Baisala alias Raja, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The court considered the request for bail against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No detailed facts or arguments were recorded in the judgment. The court allowed the bail application, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul @ Amit Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a minor's alleged abduction under Sections 140(1), 115(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory victim statements recorded under Sections …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aryan Gupta, who was charged under Sections 147, 352, 336, 308 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code in a case registered as Crime No.22 of 2024. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name does not appear in the FIR and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Zeeshan, who was arrested on 14‑02‑2026 in connection with a case under sections 115(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, stating that the injured parties suffered no grievous injuries and that the FIR was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vasid alias Kala, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 496 of 2025 under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was the injured party in an assault where a companion allegedly hit him, and argued that Section 109(1) …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Rajpoot, who was arrested in a case involving alleged assault on five persons under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the FIR, and had no criminal antecedents, noting …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sanni Chaudhary alias Gola, who had been in custody since 24 March 2026 for alleged assault under IPC sections 109, 118, 191 and a B.N.S. provision. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR did not name him, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, who was arrested in connection with a crime under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2), (3), (5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that his role was limited to restraining the injured Jiledar, while the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who had been in custody since 6 February 2025 in connection with Crime No.30 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the alleged injury to the victim was not …
The applicant Satyabhan filed Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 39004 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court, seeking release from custody in a case instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant was represented by counsel Ajay Kumar Pal, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Narendra Pal Singh …
The applicant, Sherpal, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 235 of 2025) alleging assault under Sections 109, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Sherpal was armed with an axe and bore the main role in the assault, while the defence argued that he was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sharif, Shamshad and Aslam in Criminal Case No.55 of 1989, where they were charged under Sections 325 and 308 IPC. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated, noting that the original FIR involved offences under Sections 147, …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Brahma @ Chunmun in Crime No. 59 of 2026, filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s finger injury was not caused by a human bite and was not …
Harsh Rai was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 17 of 2026) alleging assault with a sharp‑edged weapon (tangari) under Sections 191(3), 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The victim, Sanjeev Rai, sustained two incised wounds and a contused swelling, none of which were life‑threatening. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anand, who was arrested on 29 March 2026 in connection with a case under Sections 351(2), 352, 115(2) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that affidavits from the injured party and the informant denied his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Roshan @ Akash, who was named in an FIR under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. for an alleged abduction. The applicant contended that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship and no offence, asserting …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 134 of 2024 under Sections 137(2), 87 and 351(2) of the BNS. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting no allegation of abduction or sexual assault and pointing out that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahendra Gupta (also known as Pankak Gupta) in Criminal Case No. 41 of 2026, where he was alleged to be involved under Sections 109, 115(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR assigned the …
Manish Srivastava applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 216 of 2025) under Sections 143(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that he is not named in the FIR or the victim’s statement under Section 180, and that the victim’s statement under …
The applicant, Ramesh Jaiswal, sought bail in a criminal case alleging false implication for abduction and sexual assault. The prosecution alleged that he kept the victim for several days and later handed her to a co‑accused who committed rape, also citing a prior conviction under the Essential …
The applicants, Smt. Sikha Rajpoot and Virendra Kurmi, were arrested in Crime No. 752 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS. They filed a bail application claiming false implication, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS denied any abduction or sexual assault and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj @ Nikhil, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) alleging that he, along with three other accused, set an injured person on fire by pouring an accelerant. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the …
The applicants sought quashing of two charge‑sheets (Nos. 123/2015 and 124/2015) filed for offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 506 IPC arising from a property dispute over six shops. They claimed the FIRs were a malicious counter‑blow to a civil suit, that the alleged sale deed was …
Lavkush Yadav was arrested for allegedly transporting 24.5 kg of ganja and filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15137 of 2026. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and that the seizure procedure violated Section 52A of the NDPS Act …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin Verma, accused under Sections 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly facilitating an assault that resulted in grievous injuries. The applicant claimed he merely called the victim to his shop and had no role in the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivansh Pandey, who was named in FIR No. 262 of 2025 under Sections 140(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the FIR, the injured party suffered no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Durish Chauhan, who had been in custody since 13 January 2026 in a case under Sections 109(1) and 352 of the IPC relating to alleged injuries to a neighbour. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted that the medical report described …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameer @ Mohammad Faiz, who was charged in Crime No. 36 of 2024 under IPC sections 363, 366, 304A, 120B and 201. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim died of a snake bite, that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gagan, who was arrested in connection with Crime No.02 of 2026 under IPC sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and his alleged role was limited to "catching hold" …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Netrapal alias Sunny, who was charged under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. for an alleged knife assault. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR and injured’s statement only ascribed a general role to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh Singh, who was arrested in a police encounter and charged under Section 140(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abduction and ransom. Singh claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 was never …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mithun Rikasan, who was arrested under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged child‑trafficking. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the children’s statements indicated they were taken to Punjab for …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Km. Shiwani in Criminal Case No. 44 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated due to a matrimonial dispute and that she is the unmarried sister‑in‑law …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Fauji @ Abhishek, who had been in custody since March 6, 2026 in connection with a case involving alleged assault on five persons under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR did not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jagpal Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 48 of 2026) involving alleged assault on five persons under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the FIR, and …
Rahul Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.32 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 109(1), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. He claimed he was falsely implicated along with his father, Rana Singh, and that only a general role of assault was assigned to him with no dangerous injury …
The applicant Kallu @ Saurav filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15534 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No. 90 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 190 of the IPC and Section 117(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Negi Khan, who was named in an FIR but not mentioned in the victims' statements under Section 183. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that the co-accused, Lakhan, had already been granted bail. The State opposed bail but …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prakash, who was arrested in a 2018 case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged involvement in a gunshot injury. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the co-accused Kanhaiya was responsible for the injury, …
Shivam was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No.188 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, where the injured’s statement assigned him the role of ‘catching hold’ while the actual assault was attributed to co‑accused brothers Komal and …
The applicant, Hasnavi, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 359 of 2024) alleging false implication. The prosecution’s key witnesses, the informant and the injured party, turned hostile and denied the applicant’s involvement, stating the injury was caused by an unknown person. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal, who has been in custody since 24 April 2025 in Crime No. 50 of 2025 under IPC Sections 109(1), 352 and 351(3). The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the key prosecution witnesses – the informant (PW1) and the injured …
The applicant, Dalel Singh, was arrested on 26 May 2025 in connection with Crime No. 154 of 2025 under Section 140(4) of the B.N.S. and has been in custody since then. He claimed false implication, noting that the victim (PW‑3) and two key witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2) had turned hostile during trial. …
Mintu alias Shiva was arrested in connection with an assault that caused injury to the victim's right hand, under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 118(1) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. 2023. The FIR was lodged four days after the incident, and both the accused and the victim were found to be intoxicated at the …
The applicant Vijay Kumar was arrested for allegedly assaulting his wife and her sister, causing grievous injury to his wife's neck while in an inebriated state. The FIR alleges use of a sharp‑edged weapon, but the sister sustained no injury. The applicant has been in custody since 27 July 2025, has …
Monu Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 251 of 2025) alleging sexual assault of a mentally disabled 19‑year‑old victim under Sections 140(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, a delayed FIR, no prior criminal record, and that a compromise had been …
Shahrukh was arrested in Crime No. 693 of 2024 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 118(1) and 131 of the B.N.S. 2023 for allegedly causing gunshot and incised injuries to a victim. The FIR initially alleged that he and co‑accused Aamir fired a firearm, but the medical report later showed …
Ganesh Dixit applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0099 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 352, 323, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute with his brother, who was the informant, and argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandan Singh, who was arrested in Crime No.151 of 2025 under Sections 212, 217, 231, 229, 61(2), 109(1) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR was lodged by his own son after alleged self‑inflicted …
The applicant, Baijnath, was arrested in connection with a 1992 case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code alleging that he and others threw bombs at police, though no police personnel were injured. He has been in custody since 13 November 2025 and claims false implication, asserting no prior …
Arendra Yadav applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 642 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 147, 188, 307, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the FIR originally named four accused and about 50 unknown …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was in custody for Crime No. 171 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the IPC, alleging abduction and marriage of a girl who was claimed to be a minor. Ravi contended that the relationship was consensual, the girl was now his wife, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramchandra Yadav under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated and pointed to the bail granted to co‑accused in similar cases. The State did …
Shanu was arrested in connection with a sexual assault alleged to have occurred on 24.01.2026, initially charged under Sections 351(3) and 140(4) of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The victim, later found to be a 21‑year‑old adult, led to the removal of the POCSO provisions from the investigation. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan, who was named in an FIR under several IPC offences and CrPC bail provisions. The applicant claimed false implication and lack of any overt act, asserting that the injured's statement identified another co-accused, Rahul, as the assailant. …
The applicants, Randhawan and Dharm Singh, were arrested in connection with a case of assault involving six other accused, where two victims suffered multiple fractures. The applicants claimed false implication and argued they had no prior criminal record, while the State contended that they were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vansh Verma, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication based on a single base case in a gang chart and pointed to his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Yadav, who was named in an FIR and chargesheet for alleged abduction and assault under IPC sections 140(1), 115(2) and 351(3). The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out that the victim was not recovered from his possession, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dalveer Singh, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 399 of 2023 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a single base …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu alias Nikhil, who was arrested in Crime No. 790 of 2025 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a single base case in a gang …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Inam under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that he was already on bail in two base cases and had a criminal history of six …
Sunita Devi was arrested for allegedly possessing 978 grams of opium, a quantity below the commercial threshold under the NDPS Act. She sought bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15231 of 2026, arguing that a co‑accused, Sunil Kumar, who faced similar facts, had already been released on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Kumar, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he had been falsely implicated, had no prior convictions, and was already on bail in two related base cases, citing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anil Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.27 of 2026) alleging that he used a kitchen knife to cut off part of the victim's ear. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a three‑day delay in filing …
The applicant, Dharmendra Singh, was arrested for allegedly possessing counterfeit currency notes worth Rs.78,500 and filed a bail application in Crime No.14 of 2026 under Sections 178, 179, 180 and 182 of the B.N.S. 2023. He claimed he was falsely implicated, that the notes were planted, and that …
Abbas Quraishi was arrested along with three co‑accused for allegedly transporting five live buffaloes and one dead buffalo, facing charges under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 325 of the B.N.S. and Section 11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant contended that he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amil, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant had been in jail since 14 April 2026 but was already on bail in the solitary base case shown in the gang chart …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunwarpal, who was named in FIR No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR assigned a general firing role to him while the specific …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Kako @ Kafia in Criminal Case No. 149 of 2025 under Sections 8 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, was not arrested on the spot, and no narcotic …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Naushad, who is charged under Sections 307 and 411 of the IPC and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police, although no police officer was injured and the applicant himself was hurt. Naushad, who has 19 prior …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bittu Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting no abduction or sexual assault occurred and that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asif @ Asiv in a criminal case (Crime No.10 of 2026) involving alleged sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictory victim statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim, who was in custody since 8 April 2026 for an alleged offence under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that only a single base case was shown in the gang …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Yadav, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act in Crime No. 77 of 2026. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to the bail granted to similarly …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who was arrested in Crime No. 482 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in an alleged abduction, stating that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual …
The applicant, Ajay Srivastava, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 90 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 363, 366 and 368 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the victim's statements under Sections 161 and 164 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Panmati, a female accused in a case involving alleged assault on the victim Kanhaiya and his mother. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the FIR did not specifically assign her a role, while the State highlighted her alleged …
The applicant, Sohit, sought bail in a criminal case involving alleged assault under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The FIR and eyewitness statements identified him as the assailant using a ‘lathi’, but the medical report indicated that the injury to the victim’s eye was not …
Navalkishor Garg, an 80‑year‑old man, was charged under several sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for allegedly receiving an excess pension of Rs. 22,08,285, of which Rs. 4,96,000 had already been recovered. The applicant filed a second bail …
Rupesh Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) involving offences under sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S. and section 66 of the Income Tax Act. He claimed false implication and pointed to the fact that co‑accused Saloni Yadav and Suraj Kumar Tiwari, who …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was charged under Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police during an attempted arrest, though no police officer was injured. Ravi claimed the weapon and cartridge …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Haseen under Sections 143(4) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. in Crime No. 35 of 2025. The allegation against Haseen was that he facilitated the transfer of a victim from a Delhi bus‑stand to co‑accused, who later married her, with no claim of physical or …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prince, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 321 of 2025 under sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a solitary base case and that he …
The applicant, Nathilal Rathore, sought bail in a case under Sections 307 and 504 IPC, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the injury to the victim was minor, occurring on a non‑vital part of the body. He alleged a prior grievance where the victim had killed his son, leading to earlier …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilshad in a case under Sections 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and 87 of the B.N.S., alleging abduction of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant’s counsel argued that the victim, a major, had been mischaracterised as a minor and that her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Pal under Sections 2(b)(xi), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 61 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no conviction in the present case and was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kaushar, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Crime No. 426 of 2025) based solely on confessional statements of co-accused who had already been granted bail. The applicant argued that no narcotics were recovered from his possession and that he is not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Yadav, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 118(1) and 123(1) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a person named Rinku with sharp edged weapons. The applicant argued that the injuries were simple, he had no prior criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepu Bharti in an NDPS case (Crime No. 131 of 2026) alleging that he was falsely implicated in a drug‑trafficking offence. No contraband was recovered from his possession and he was not arrested on the spot, unlike co‑accused who were police …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krish Keerwal @ Chirag, who had been in custody since 31 March 2026 in connection with a case under Sections 109(1), 125, 191(2) and 190 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no …
The High Court considered the bail application of Mohit Sharma, who was arrested in connection with a fight alleged under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had only a general role in the FIR, no weapon was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Thakur, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No. 27 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a solitary base case (Crime No. 618 …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Srivastav, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he had been falsely implicated and was already on bail in three related cases, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Balakram, who was arrested on 13‑02‑2026 in connection with a case originally under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. but later converted to Section 118(2). The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanavar Husain, accused under Sections 109(1) and 352 of the B.N.S. for an assault case in Jaunpur. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR only gave him a general role and that medical reports showed no grievous injury or …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj Kumar Yadav, who was implicated in Crime No. 133 of 2026 under Sections 288 and 109(1) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the injured’s statement did not specifically identify him as the person who …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunny, who was arrested on 14 February 2026 from a spa alleged to be involved in sex trade and charged under Section 143(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. Sunny contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 in Criminal Case No. 27 of 2026. The applicant claimed false implication in a flesh‑trade raid and argued that no woman or minor …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kaushar Singh under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that similarly situated co‑accused had already been released on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act for alleged cow slaughter in Bareilly. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and the only item recovered from him …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nand Kishor alias Chhotu in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that he was not named in the FIR and that the only alleged link was a rope recovered from his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil, who was arrested in Crime No.40 of 2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 109(1). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the FIR named him incorrectly and that the injuries alleged to have been caused by him …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Vinayak Malviya, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No.13 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that only …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj Pandey, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and pointed out that he had no prior …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jay Singh, who was arrested on 29‑08‑2025 in connection with Crime No.130 of 2025 under IPC Sections 109 and 115(2) BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, stating he was only alleged to have assaulted an informant whose statement was not …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Juvenile X, a minor accused in a case involving assault and the death of a patient due to septicemia. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedents, and that the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Dr. Rajesh alias Vinesh, who was charged in Crime No. 279 of 2024 under Section 105 of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly administering treatment that led to a death. The applicant contended she was not a qualified doctor, was an …
Ayush Patel applied for bail in a cyber‑fraud case (Cr. No. 17 of 2025) involving alleged opening of fake bank accounts and transfer of Rs 1 crore, charged under IPC sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and IT Act section 66D. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement was derived from …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Nishu @ Bhuvnesh Swaroop in a case arising from a delayed FIR concerning a death on 10‑10‑2025. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR was lodged nine days after the alleged incident and that the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramnaresh Sahu, an agent of Loni Urban Multi State Credit and Thrift Cooperative Society, in a case involving alleged default on fixed and recurring deposits. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was already on …
The applicant, Harendra Chauhan, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, was his consensual partner and that they had married and she was pregnant with his …
