Created by Fuzzy Cloud

RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA

409 judgments · newest first · showing 401–409

AJAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ajad Ali applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 108, 352 and 351(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the alleged suicide of a deceased person. The FIR, lodged a month after the incident, did not name him but mentioned his mobile number and …

SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant sought to withdraw that application and requested liberty to file a regular bail application before the appropriate court. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed …

RAHUL JAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rahul Jain under Section 69 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that the FIR admitted a consensual relationship and that the victim, a married woman, could not enter into a valid marriage, rendering the …

MOHD YUNUSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Yunus under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and …

NEHA @ NEHA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Neha Mishra under Section 482 CrPC in a murder case (Crime No. 461 of 2025). The petitioner argued that she was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged nine days after the incident, she has no criminal record, and she is a …

SHEESHKALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sheeshkali, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, in a dowry‑related case under Sections 85, 80(2), 352 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, had no …

PRAKASH ANAND RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prakash Anand Rao, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No.523 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354ख, 376 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. Rao claimed he was falsely implicated due to a civil …

TUSHAR CHANDEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Tushar Chandel and another, were named in an FIR for assaulting three persons, resulting in minor injuries except a fracture to one victim. They sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming false implication, no specific role, no prior criminal …

PRAKASH SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Prakash Singh and another applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Their counsel argued that an interim order had been passed by the trial court, but it was unclear whether a charge sheet had been filed. The State counsel was directed to inform …