Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
832 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Mohd Yaseen against the respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Santosh Kumar Tiwari, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw. Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the petition as …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mainpuri to decide a 2015 injunction suit expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautions …
The petitioners sought a writ under Article 227 directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Kanpur Dehat to expedite Civil Suit No. 336 of 2013. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautioned constitutional courts …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of a restoration application filed in Suit No. 198 of 2018, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The petition alleged that the suit was pending restoration and requested the High Court to intervene. The Court, noting that no …
Anil Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Prayagraj to decide his suit (No 470 of 2019) and the related 6‑C injunction application within a fixed time. The High Court held that the first prayer could not be granted because …
The petitioner, Sri Manmohan Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) to decide Appeal No. A/1304/2023, which was filed against an order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, on merits and …
The petitioner, Nisha, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of an execution case (No. 15 of 2024) arising from a decree in her favour dated 22‑11‑2023. The petition relied on recent Supreme Court pronouncements in Periyammal v. Rajamani (2025) and Rahul S. Shah v. Jindendra Kumar …
The petitioner, Sudama Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 18, Azamgarh, to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in Civil Suit No. 285 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the matter …
The petitioner, Shanti Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) East, Ballia to decide a temporary injunction application (6-C) filed on 19.01.2026 in Original Suit No. 73 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Fast Track Court, Agra, to decide an 8‑C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 574 of 2022. The High Court found that keeping the petition pending would …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of District Mainpuri to decide Original Suit No. 463 of 2022. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautioned …
Smt Sarita Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of Misc. Case No. 190/74/18, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner requested the High Court to intervene and order the lower court to decide the matter promptly. The Court noted that …
The petitioners filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to protect their peaceful possession of a property, and also moved an application (6-C) for a temporary injunction, which the trial court allowed on 20‑04‑2024. The State appealed the interim order, and the appellate court upheld it, …
The petitioner sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kaushambi to expedite Original Suit No. 440 of 2015. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which limits constitutional courts from …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Chhata, Mathura to decide Original Suit No. 180 of 2007 for cancellation of a sale deed and permanent injunction within a stipulated period. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court precedent (High Court …
The petitioner, Raza Zaki, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to decide Marriage Petition No. 694 of 2025 concerning restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner alleged that he was married to Alisha Haider under …
The petitioner, Shankar Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Kaushambi to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 261 of 2025. The High Court, after examining the petition at the admission …
The petitioner, Mumtaz Ahmad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaushambi, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 748 of 2024. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending served no …
The petitioner, Lalji, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge to decide his original suit (No. 612 of 2020) expeditiously. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which held that …
The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Shukla, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (South), Kanpur Nagar to decide MACP No. 27 of 2023 expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the claim had been pending since 2023 without progress. The Court noted that no …
The petitioners Chandan and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mau, to decide a Section 6‑C‑2 temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 1418 of 2009. The High Court examined the petition and found that no …
The petitioners Kanchan Pradeep Vishwakarma and another sought the release of the full claim amount awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that a similar issue had been finally decided on 10 September 2026 in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 Ors. v. Union of …
The petitioners Shobha Chauhan and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Suit No. 956 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the petition …
The petitioner sought release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that the issue of release had already attained finality by its earlier judgment in Ram Naresh Singh and 5 Ors. Vs. Union of India dated 10 September 2026. Accordingly, the present writ …
Ajay Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Bansi, to decide a pending 7C(2) temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 256 of 2024. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at the …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Kushinagar to decide their case (No. 466/2024) under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 within a fixed time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …
The petitioner, Janki Kushwaha, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 10, Allahabad, to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C) dated 29‑04‑2023 in Case No. 397 of 2023. The High Court observed that keeping the …
The petitioners Nirmala and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 14, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in civil case No. 866 of 2026. …
Jaswant Singh, a borrower, filed a writ petition challenging an order that was appealable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The High Court examined whether the petition was maintainable given the existence of an alternative remedy. The Court held that the petitioner could pursue the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑2, Meerut, to decide a pending restitution of conjugal rights case (Section 9, Hindu Marriage Act) within the time fixed by the court. The petition argued that the case had …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to dispose of suit No. 733/2021 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Sant Kabir Nagar to decide a temporary injunction application (Form 6-C) dated 06.07.2025 in Original Suit No. 362 of 2015. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shamli, to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C) dated 22‑08‑2024 filed in Original Suit No. 200 of 2024. The High Court, noting that no useful purpose would be served by …
The petitioner, Smt. Kailashi Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 3, Gorakhpur to decide a pending Section 7‑C temporary injunction application in Civil Suit No. 931 of 2016. The High Court observed that keeping …
The petitioner sought the release of the entire claim amount awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that a similar issue had already been decided in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 Ors. v. Union of India), where the claim amount was ordered to be released. The …
The petitioners Pratap Singh and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mainpuri, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 1254 of 2023. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur, to decide MACP No.447 of 2019 (Munnilal & others v. Udairaj & others) which had been pending since 2019. The petition argued that continued delay served no useful purpose and that the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Ghaziabad, to decide his divorce case (filed under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955) within a stipulated period, alleging undue delay since …
The petitioner sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur Nagar to decide an original civil suit (No. 2554/2013) within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautioned …
The petitioner, Rajinder Pal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No.4 of 2022 (NHAI vs. Rajinder Pal Singh) within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that an application under Section 34 of …
The petitioner, Sukhvindar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No. 7 of 2023 (NHAI v. Sukhvindar Singh) within a fixed period as mandated by Section 34(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The …
Mukesh Kumar Sahu filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lalitpur, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Civil Suit No. 120 of 2024. The High Court, after examining the petition at the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Baghpat to decide a pending temporary injunction (8-C2) application in Case No. 315 of 2025. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at the admission …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Atrauli, Aligarh, to decide a Section 6-C2 temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 72 of 2025. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending would serve no …
The petitioners, Mohd Afjal and another, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the entire claim amount awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The claim had already attained finality by a prior judgment of this Court dated 10 September 2026 in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 …
The petitioners, Ram Tirath and another, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the entire claim amount awarded to them by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The respondents, Union of India and another, opposed the relief. The Court observed that the same issue had already been finally decided in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hathrus, to decide a temporary injunction (7C2) application pending in Original Suit No. 142 of 2026. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus under Article 227 directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Gunnaur to decide Suit No.10 of 2025 within a time frame fixed by the High Court. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
Sobha Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Kaushambi, to decide her divorce petition (Case No. 207 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging undue delay since 2025. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Aligarh to expedite original suit No. 861/2024. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …
Mohammad Danish filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 32, Azamgarh, to decide a temporary injunction application (7‑C2) pending in Original Suit No. 572 of 2022. The petition was presented before the Allahabad High …
The petition was filed by Smt. Kusma Devi seeking a direction to the Gram Nyayadhikari of Madhogarh, Jalaun, to decide a temporary injunction application (7‑C2) dated 24‑01‑2023 filed in Suit No. 19 of 2023. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose, …
The petitioner, Ajay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hapur to dispose of Civil Suit No. 204 of 2024 within a short, court‑specified period. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Bareilly, to decide a pending 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 492 of 2026. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Maurya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide his 2016 suit within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
The petitioner, Dadan Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a pending application (Misc. Application No. 487 of 2023) filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC, which sought enforcement of a temporary injunction granted in the original suit. The petitioner alleged …
The petitioner, Rahul Mittal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Bulandshahr to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) in Suit No. 24 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
Shyam Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura, to decide a temporary injunction (6-C) application pending in Civil Suit No. 1629 of 2025. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at the …
Satendra Nath and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which was pending in the original suit. The petition sought only a direction to the lower court to decide the application promptly. The High …
The petitioner, Sughar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application filed in the original suit (No. 1993 of 2025) in favor of the respondents. The petitioner had objected to the injunction on 26 September 2025, and the writ petition …
The petitioner, Phoolmati Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application (7C2) filed in the original suit No. 613 of 2025, along with her objection (Paper No. 25C2). The court noted that the petition had no substantive merit beyond the …
The petitioner, Smt. Shiksha Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Banda, to decide her mutual‑consent divorce petition (No. 370 of 2026) filed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The parties had been …
Raj Kumari filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Court examined whether the claim could be released after the earlier judgment in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 Ors. v. Union of India) had …
The petitioner Laxman Rai filed a writ petition challenging the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that the issue of release of the claim had already attained finality in its earlier judgment dated 10 September 2026 in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which was pending in the original suit decreed ex-parte. The High Court, noting that no substantive hearing was required, disposed of the writ petition …
The petitioner, Smt. Sandhya Prajapati, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kannauj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) in Suit No. 308 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (S/D) of Maharajganj to decide Original Suit No. 200 of 2006 within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which restricts constitutional courts …
Petitioner Princika Agrawal filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide her Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act application (Case No. 642 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the case was …
M/s R.R. Traders, an auction purchaser of a mortgaged property, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Allahabad, to decide a pending stay‑vacation application (I.A. No.4938/2026) in S.A. No. 662 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the delay in the …
Petitioner Shyam Lal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The parties later settled the dispute, with the respondent agreeing to pay Rs.21,000 to the petitioner. The draft of the settlement amount was handed over to the petitioner's counsel on 28 September 2026. Upon receipt of the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Rishikesh Tripiri, informed the court that the matter had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The court considered whether the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief concerning a civil appeal filed by the respondent. The respondent's civil appeal was subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution, rendering the subject matter of …
Petitioner Rakesk Kumar Garg filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging an order in Original Suit No.06 of 2013. The petitioner produced a certified copy of the order, but the underlying suit had been withdrawn by order dated 12 September 2026. The Court held that the withdrawal of the suit …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners, Arvind Srivastava, requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered whether such a withdrawal with liberty to …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority to expedite Execution Case No. 56 of 2023 pending before the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Authority. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Periyammal v. Rajamani (2025) and Rahul …
The petitioner, Shri Lakhan Pratap, sought to withdraw his writ petition filed under Article 227, requesting liberty to appeal the order he was challenging. The respondent, M/S Basant Overseas and others, were served with notice. The petitioner’s counsel formally requested withdrawal. The High Court …
The petitioner, Rishabh Dwivedi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑3, Kanpur Nagar to decide his pending Section 12 Hindu Marriage Act petition (case no. 2334 of 2024) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued …
The petitioners sought to set aside an order dated 04.08.2025 passed by the Gram Nyayalay, Mant, District Mathura in Original Suit No. 42 of 2025 (Harmaya Devi v. Vimlesh). They requested the High Court to direct the lower court to expedite the pending suit. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The plaintiff's original suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and an application under Order IX Rule 4 of the CPC for restoration of the suit is pending. The plaintiff filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of the restoration application. The High Court, finding …
The petitioner, Dilip Upadhyay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Agra, to decide a pending mutual divorce case (No. 1011/2025) filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The parties were married under Hindu rites on 7 December 1996 and were …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the pending Original Suit No. 1042 of 2022 (originally filed in 1999). The High Court referred to the precedent of Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali Isteba, which generally disallows such …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ghaziabad to expedite Original Suit No. 33 of 2023 and decide it within a time‑bound schedule. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State …
The petitioners, who are defendants in an original suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the grant of a temporary injunction (Section 6C) in the suit. The lower court had issued notices and granted an ad interim injunction, and the petitioners had filed objections under Order …
Virendra filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Mathura to decide a 7‑C application filed in Original Suit No. 855 of 2020. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose. Consequently, the Court …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Jaunpur to decide a 2006 civil suit (Case No. 830 of 2006) within a stipulated period. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive under Article 227, noting the Supreme Court’s decision in High …
The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Sant Kabir Nagar to decide case No.514 of 2021 (Rampher v. Ram Chandra) concerning a land dispute. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive for expeditious disposal of a civil …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Dumariyaganj, Siddharthnagar to decide a 7‑C2 application filed in Original Suit No.113 of 2019. The High Court found that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose …
The petitioner, Ram Charan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Hamirpur to decide his original suit against Ram Narayan expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Aligarh, to decide an injunction application filed in Civil Appeal No. 107 of 2026 under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC. The High Court observed that keeping the matter …
The Nagar Palika Parishad Loni filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the rejection of its transfer application by the respondents, Methodist Church Loni and others. The petition sought judicial interference with the administrative decision. The High Court, after …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Auraiya to decide a pending 6‑C application in Suit No.165 of 2026. The High Court, finding no merit to be adjudicated and deeming the matter suitable for disposal at the admission …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh decide a suit pending since February 2019 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
Smt. Kalawati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of her objection to an ad interim injunction granted in an original suit and her application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of that suit. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending served no …
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and an application under Order IX Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking restoration of the suit is pending. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 solely requesting an expeditious disposal of the restoration …
Petitioner Karuna Shankar Dixit filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order for the issue disposal of Succession Case No. 66 of 2003 pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Varanasi, alleging irreparable loss if not expedited. The High Court referred to the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 937 of 2022. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at …
Dr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Agra, to conclude his divorce proceedings (Case No.2935/2023) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act within two months. The petitioner argued that the petition had been …
Surendra Kumar Pathak filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Sikandramau, Hathras, to decide a 7-C application filed in Original Suit No.213 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose. …
The petitioners sought a direction for the restoration of a suit that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The High Court noted that no further procedural steps such as counter‑affidavit or notice were necessary at the admission stage. Accordingly, the Court directed the lower court to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mohammadabad, Azamgarh to expedite the disposal of Original Suit No. 79 of 2008. The petitioner argued that delay would cause irreparable loss. The High Court referred to the Supreme …
The plaintiff's suit was decreed ex-parte, after which the defendant filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC, which remains pending. The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 seeking an expeditious disposal of that application. The High Court observed that no further procedural …
Smt. Amla Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Moradabad, to release Rs. 2,00,000 that had been placed in a fixed deposit as part of a compromise order dated 13.12.2025. The compromise, arrived at in Lok Adalat, …
Bharat Lal filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a Section 6-C application filed in Case No. 185 of 2021. The petitioner argued that the pending application required prompt adjudication. The High Court observed that …
The petition was filed by Ved Prakash seeking a direction to the Senior Division Civil Judge, Basti, to decide a 6‑C2 application pending in Original Suit No. 476 of 2026. The High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, noted that keeping the matter pending served no …
Petitioner Gaurav Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to expedite the pending divorce case No. 830 of 2022 filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide Original Suit No. 142 of 2021 expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) F.T.C., Prayagraj to decide an impleadment application dated 22‑11‑2014 and an application under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code dated 02‑07‑2015, pending in Suit No. 1173 of 2013, on a …
The petitioner, Dr. Zafar Ali Khan, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Azamgarh to decide case No.473 of 2011 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Hathras, to decide a pending divorce petition filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the case was pending and required expeditious disposal. The Court noted …
Petitioners Pradeep and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) in Jaunpur to expedite Suit No.24 of 2026 against the respondents. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
Manjeet Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Etah, to decide his pending divorce petition filed in 2025. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending for an undue period. The Court …
The petitioner, Tridev Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226/227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of the Fast Track Court‑I, Maharajganj, decide Suit No. 395 of 2015 expeditiously. The High Court examined precedent, notably the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioners sought a writ under Article 227 directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Gorakhpur to decide Suit No.1452 of 2011 within a time‑frame fixed by the High Court. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …
The petitioner, Neeraj, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 144 of 2025) that arose from an ex-parte decree against him. The appeal had been filed after an Order IX Rule 13 CPC application was dismissed. The High Court, noting …
Lalbrat Maurya filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide a pending 6-C application in Suit No.1647 of 2024. The High Court, after noting that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose, disposed of the petition at …
The petitioner, Prahlad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Gorakhpur to decide a 7-C application pending in Original Suit No. 890 of 2017. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and disposed …
Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide his pending divorce case (Case No.1206 of 2025) under Section 13(1)(i‑a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce …
The petitioner, Nilendu Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of his pending appeal (No. 51/2024) before the Judge of the Small Causes Court, Allahabad. The petition solely requested that the lower court decide the appeal within a stipulated …
The petitioner, Shyam Soni, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jhansi, to expedite the trial of his divorce suit (Suit No. 1074 of 2025). The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since 2025. The Court …
Rizwan Miya filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Bareilly, to decide a 6-C application pending in Original Suit No. 407 of 2026. The petition argued that the Small Causes Court should be compelled to hear and dispose of the application promptly. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Ghazipur to expedite Original Suit No. 347 of 2013. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which holds that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 827 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose. …
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and a restoration application (No. 154 of 2022) was filed. The petitioner sought a direction from the High Court under Article 227 to have the lower court decide the restoration application. The High Court found no need for further …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mau to decide Suit No. 1030 of 2024 against the respondents on an expedited basis. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which held that …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Firozabad decide his pending civil suit (No 100/2019) within a stipulated period. The High Court examined whether a constitutional court can impose a time‑bound …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut to expedite case No. 930 of 2020 (Abdul Waheed v. Nadeem & another). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s ruling in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautions constitutional courts …
The petitioner, Sameer Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the 3rd Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide his pending divorce case (Case No. 438 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on a day‑to‑day …
The petition was filed by the proposed defendant seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the CPC, which was pending in the Civil Suit No. 22 of 2022 where the plaintiffs‑respondents had obtained an ex‑parte decree. The …
The petition, filed on behalf of a third party, sought an order for the speedy disposal of an impleadment application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC in Suit No. 325 of 2020. The High Court observed that keeping the writ petition pending would serve no useful purpose and that there was no …
The petition, filed under Article 227, sought an order for the speedy disposal of an impleadment application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code in Suit No.326 of 2020. The High Court found that no further procedural steps such as counter‑affidavit or notice to private …
The petitioners, Ramashankar Mishra (deceased) and another, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite Original Suit No. 116 of 1994, which had remained pending for over 32 years. The High Court considered the earlier decision in Ali …
The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Fatehpur to decide an original suit (No. 599 of 2014) on a permanent injunction within a short, court‑specified time. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, Jaunpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 891 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending without …
The petitioner, Jai Narayan Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Kaushambi to decide a pending 6‑C application in Original Suit No.143 of 2025. The High Court examined the petition at the admission stage and found that keeping the …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking an interim direction for the trial court to decide a pending miscellaneous case arising from a partition suit filed in 1964. The petition alleged that while a preliminary decree had been prepared, the final decree had not been issued, causing …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Etawah to decide Original Suit No. 265 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar …
Petitioners filed a suit and obtained an ad interim injunction, subsequently moving a temporary injunction (7‑C) application. The respondents appealed the ad interim injunction under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the CPC. The High Court partially allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the trial …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction (6C) application filed in Original Suit No. 412 of 2026. The lower court had already issued notices and granted an ad interim injunction, and the defendant had filed objections. The High Court, …
The petitioners, Muskan Trading Corporation and others, approached the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Lucknow, to hear and decide pending applications for interim relief, urgency, and amendment filed in Securitisation Application No. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandauli, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 711 of 2022. The petition argued that the application had remained undecided for an unreasonable period. …
Maharj Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Konch, Jalaun, to decide a 7‑C2 application pending in Original Suit No. 399 of 2023. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending served no useful purpose and disposed of it …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-11, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 2178 of 2023. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …
Chhote Lal Ahirwar filed a petition challenging an order, alleging it was not appealable. The Court examined whether the order fell within the ambit of an appealable order under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It held that the order was indeed appealable under the said …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Auraiya to decide a pending temporary injunction application (23-C) in Suit No. 109 of 2026 within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Maharajganj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 377 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Aligarh to expedite the disposal of an original suit pending since 2015. The petitioner relied on a recent Supreme Court decision that, except in exceptional circumstances, …
The petitioner, Amir, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C2) in Suit No. 182 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …
The petition filed by Ram Kishun challenged an order that was deemed appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioner, represented by counsel Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, sought relief from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The Court examined whether the order …
The petitioner, Vikash Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mau, to decide his pending divorce case (No. 257/2021) within a stipulated period. The petition alleged that the divorce petition had …
The petitioner, Babar Ali Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of a miscellaneous civil appeal (No. 28 of 2026) that was pending due to an objection by the defendant on its maintainability. The underlying civil suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution, …
Madhu Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, Division, Court No.5, Kanpur Nagar to decide an interim injunction application in Suit No.38 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose and …
The petitioner, Vipin Mittal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of District Auraiya to decide Suit No. 109 of 2020 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 342 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been left undecided for an …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Baheri, Bareilly, to decide a suit (Case No. 108/2024) expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The petitioner Subba Ram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Varanasi, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1842 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …
Petitioner Ram Murti Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Uttar Pradesh State Public Service Tribunal to expeditiously decide his pending claim petition (No. 2343/2018). The petition contained no other relief and no counter‑affidavit was filed. The High …
The petitioner, Gulabi Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Azamgarh, to decide a 7‑C2 application filed in Suit No. 1702 of 2026. The High Court examined the petition at the admission stage and found that keeping the matter …
Amir filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C2) in Suit No. 816 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending for …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Bidhuna to decide Suit No. 584 of 2023 within a specific time frame. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …
The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 13, Allahabad, to decide his civil suit (Original Suit No. 0724/2015) within a stipulated time, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The High Court …
The petitioner, Gomti Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaushambi, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Paper No. 6‑C) in Suit No. 44 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petition under Article 227 sought direction on a suit where the plaintiffs had moved for a temporary injunction and the defendants had filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The High Court noted that ordinarily the lower court decides the maintainability of the suit by …
The petitioners, Smt Usha Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Budh Nagar to decide a specific application (6‑C2) filed in Original Suit No.1289 of 2026. The High Court examined whether it …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order to expedite a pending Miscellaneous Application (No. 467 of 2024) for restoration of a suit that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The High Court observed that keeping the writ petition pending served no useful purpose …
The petitioner, Dhruv Rajan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mainpuri, to decide a pending suit (Case No. 127 of 2025) filed under Sections 17 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 on an expedited basis. The petition …
The petitioner, Smt. Arti, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.4, Prayagraj to decide her divorce petition (Marriage Petition No.2204 of 2024) under Section 13A of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously. The petitioner argued …
Petitioner Niraj Nigam filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to decide pending Case No.144 of 2025, which involves Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Sections 7Ka and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The …
The petition concerned a house inherited by two brothers, Rajkumar Tiwari (petitioner) and Munnalal Tiwari (respondent No.1), whose father had purchased. No partition of the undivided property had been effected, yet Munnalal sold his share to Bharat Kumar Tiwari (respondent No.2) and began …
Petitioners Jyotsana Upadhaya and another filed a writ petition (Writ No. 110 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court against New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The petition sought relief, but during the hearing counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petition had become infructuous due …
The petitioner, Shiv Ji, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the Nagar Palika Parishad Ballia and others, claiming possession of Plots No.163 and 182 based on his father's name in old records. He also applied for a temporary injunction, which was rejected by the trial court and the …
Petitioner Mayank Gupta filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, he submitted a withdrawal application supported by an affidavit seeking to dismiss the writ petition. The Court examined the application and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was …
Petitioner Hazi Ilias filed a writ petition under Article 227 against Nagar Palika Parishad and another respondent. The petition was listed but no party appeared to press the writ. The court observed that the petitioner seemed to have lost interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the writ …
The petitioner, Sant Prasad Dubey, married the respondent, Madhuri, under Hindu rites in 2008 and they have three children. In the divorce proceedings, the respondent sought maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The trial court ordered a modest lump‑sum litigation …
Petitioners Kailu Chaupal and another filed a writ petition challenging the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Court noted that the claim had already attained finality by its earlier judgment in Ram Naresh Singh and 5 Ors. Vs. Union of India dated 10 September …
The petitioners, Raghuvir and another, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court observed that the question of release of the claim had already been finally decided in the earlier judgment of Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 in Ram …
The petitioner, married under Hindu rites on 5 March 2025, filed a joint petition for mutual divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act on 16 March 2026. An application to waive the statutory cooling period was filed on 8 April 2026 but was rejected by the family court. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Sarthak Chaturvedi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Ashutosh Gupta, expressed that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. …
A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Smt. Dipika Chaturvedi against Sarthak Chaturvedi. The petitioner, through counsel Saurabh Pandey, expressed that she no longer wishes to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel was present but no opposition to the …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Execution Case No. 10 of 2025 (Prabhawati vs Saral) within a stipulated period. The petition contended that the original suit was decreed ex‑parte on 5 April 2022 and that no appeal or application under …
Manoj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide Reference Case No. 21 of 2026 concerning the classification of his land as non‑agricultural under Section 143 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the claim for …
Petitioner Tej Pratap Singh, through counsel, withdrew his challenge to the impugned order in a writ petition under Article 227. The High Court, noting the withdrawal, directed the petitioner to file an application for expeditious disposal of the related Original Suit No.1051 of 2024 within 15 days, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Agra, to expedite the pending claim (M.A.C. No. 710 of 2019) under Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioners argued that the claim had been pending since 2019 without …
The petitioners, Ashish Yadav and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 70 of 2024) that arose from a rejected application for temporary injunction in their suit. The High Court noted that the writ petition had …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Junior Division Civil Judge in Jhansi to dispose of an adoption‑deed cancellation suit pending since July 2018 without further adjournments, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar …
Awadhesh Baghel filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, to decide his pending divorce petition (No. 1258 of 2024) within a fixed period, alleging undue delay since 2024. The petitioner argued that the prolonged …
Petitioner Shah Alam, married under Muslim rites, filed a restitution of conjugal rights case (Matrimonial Case/Hakook‑E‑Jaujiyat No. 434 of 2025) before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Sambhal at Chandausi. He subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the …
Deeksha Swaroop filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Agra, to decide her divorce case (Case No. 775 of 2026) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging undue delay since 2026. The petitioner argued that the family court had not disposed of …
The petitioner, Ramsurat Yadav, filed a defendant's petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application (7-C) filed in Civil Suit No. 918 of 2026. The High Court noted that the injunction application and the defendant's objections were pending consideration. To …
The petitioner, Ameer Beg, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, to expedite the hearing and disposal of his matrimonial petition (No. 655 of 2024) filed under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Family Court to expedite the trial of a Section 11 Hindu Marriage Act petition pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that the case had been unduly delayed. The court examined Section 21B of the Hindu Marriage Act, …
The petitioner, Khatoon, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Thakurdwara, Moradabad, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 130 of 2026. The High Court, without calling for a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide an original civil suit (No. 2799 of 2020) within a stipulated time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Auraiya, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. The High Court, finding no merit in keeping the petition pending, disposed of it at the …
The petitioners Kanhaiyalal sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Badohi to expedite case No.801 of 2018, invoking Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …
Petitioner Kapil Bhardwaj filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to hear and dispose of his Hindu Marriage Act petition (HMA Case No. 2979 of 2024) within three months without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner argued that the petition under …
Avanish Kumar Agrawal filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Bijnor, to decide the execution of an arbitral award dated 27 September 2025 in his favour against the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). NHAI had filed an application under Section 34 of the …
The petitioner filed a petition challenging the order of a civil miscellaneous appeal that had allowed an appeal against an ad‑interim injunction granted in a suit for a temporary injunction (6C2). The petitioner contended that such an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC was not maintainable. …
The petitioners, Smt. Asha and another, filed a defendant's petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking an order for the speedy disposal of an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code in the original suit No. 465 of 2009. The High Court observed that keeping the …
Petitioner Jaiveer Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aligarh to dispose Suit No. 295 of 2025, filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioner, Smt Sonmati Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Bansgaon to expedite Original Suit No. 624/2023. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
