Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

832 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

BANSHIversusVENKATESHWAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Banshi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 26, Deoria decide Original Suit No. 646 of 2013 expeditiously. The petition relied on alleged urgency and asked the High Court to fix a time‑bound schedule …

OM PRAKASH SINGHversusSEEMA @ SIMMI AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kasya Kushinagar, to decide a Section 6‑C temporary injunction application pending in Case No. 801 of 2026. The High Court examined whether it should entertain the …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Iglas, Aligarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) in Suit No. 63 of 2023 within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the injunction …

RAJENDRA PRASAD SONKARversusRAM BABU AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)‑II, Kanpur Nagar to dispose of Civil Suit No. 1789 of 2018 within a time‑frame fixed by the petitioner. The High Court examined the recent …

DEVESH KUMAR GOELversusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) to decide Suit No. 374/2001 within a stipulated time. The petitioner later clarified that the suit had already been decided and the real relief sought was the expeditious disposal of Civil …

PRAMOD DWIVEDIversusRAJ KUMAR AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Pramod Dwivedi filed an election petition before the District Judge, Fatehpur, challenging the election of the Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad Fatehpur under Sections 19 and 20 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. The petition, pending since 3 June 2023, sought an order for its …

MUKESH BABUversusRAM NARESH AND 3 OTHERS

Mukesh Babu filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a restraining order against the respondents for allegedly violating an interim injunction granted by a trial court. The Court examined whether a writ petition was the appropriate remedy for such a breach. It held that the correct …

BRIJESH KUMAR BHARTIversusKRISHNA RAJ AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Prayagraj decide Original Suit No. 1003 of 2023 within a fixed time‑frame. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

SUNITA DEVIversusSADANAND MAURYA AND ANOTHER

Sunita Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur, to decide Application 25C pending in her original suit for specific performance (Original Suit No. 389/2019). The petitioner argued that the pending application was …

NARENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSOHAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) in Agra to expedite the disposal of a pending claim (MACT No. 371 of 2019) under Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioners argued that the claim had been pending …

KAVITA DEVIversusBRAJMOHAN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Kavita Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mau to dispose of her suit (Case No. 1385 of 2025) within two months. The Court examined precedent, noting the Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association v. …

ANITA TRIVEDIversusRAVI TRIVEDI

The petitioner, Anita Trivedi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to expedite the pending matrimonial application (Case No. 1334 of 2021) filed under Sections 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petition …

SABARUN NESHAversusMD CHHAGUR AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Deoria to decide a civil suit (Original Suit No. 1919 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State …

ANNU KUMARversusVISHAL RANA

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Muzaffarnagar, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 01 of 2023. The High Court, finding no merit in keeping the petition pending, disposed …

UMESH RAI AND 3 OTHERSversusKULDEEP @ MUNNA RAI AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners sought an expeditious disposal of a temporary injunction (7C) application filed in Original Suit No. 468 of 2022, where an ad interim injunction had already been granted. The respondents had filed objections under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC, and the petitioners moved a writ …

VIJAY BREWERIES LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusASHOK MITRA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vijay Breweries Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fatehpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7-C2) in Suit No. 298 of 2026 within a fixed time. The petition …

RAJKUMARI GUPTA URF RAJKUMARversusPYARE DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rajkumari Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 677 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …

VIPIN MITTALversusHARIOM PORWAL AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 168 of 2026. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

ANOOP SINGHversusGARIMA SINGH

Petitioner Anoop Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Chitrakoot, to dispose of his pending divorce case (Case No. 48 of 2023) within a month. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since 2023, causing …

VIKAS YADAVversusVIJAY BHAN BIND

The petitioner, Vikas Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Azamgarh to decide his civil suit (No. 229 of 2025) expeditiously, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

SMT RAMRATIversusVIJAY KUMAR MISHRA

Smt Ramrati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Purvi, Prayagraj, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Suit No. 2318 of 2026. The High Court, after examining the petition at the admission stage, found no …

RAJEEV KUMAR CHOUDHARYversusSMT. SEEMA SHARMA

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Choudhary, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide his divorce case (Case No. 475 of 2020) filed under section 13(1‑ka) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a …

RAKESH KUMAR AGRAHARIversusPISHOO @ SONU AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order for the speedy disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC, which remained pending after the original suit was dismissed for want of prosecution on 13-08-2015. The court noted that the writ petition had no …

SMT KAMALA DEVI AND 5 OTHERSversusVISHNU SINGH

The petitioners, Kamala Devi and others, obtained a decree for a mandatory injunction and eviction in a suit filed by the plaintiff, which was upheld by the trial court and the appellate court. The plaintiff's civil appeal was dismissed, and an execution case (No. 26 of 2021) remains pending. The …

NAGMA KHANversusRAMVILAS AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nagma Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Civil Judge (JD) in Mohammadabad, Ghazipur to expedite the hearing and disposal of a stay application filed in Misc. Case No. 32/2026. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the stay application was …

SMT PREMPYARI PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusOMVEER SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kanpur to decide their civil suit (Case No. 705 of 2021) expeditiously under Sections 31 and 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The High Court examined whether it could impose a time‑bound schedule on a subordinate court …

VIDYA AND 5 OTHERSversusSHATRUGHAN AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Azamgarh to decide Suit No. 2300 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …

FARAKATversusRAMNATH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 568 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

MUKESH PATELversusRAKESH PATEL AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Patel, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Hawali, Varanasi to decide Suit No.34 of 2014 within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

TUPHANI GIRI AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Tuphani Giri and another filed a writ petition against the Union of India seeking the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Court noted that the issue of release of that claim had already attained finality by its earlier judgment dated 10 September 2026 …

SANTOSH KUMAR RAIversusSMT. NAGEETA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Rai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Poorvi, Ballia, to expedite the disposal of Original Suit No. 403/2013. The petitioner relied on a recent Supreme Court decision that, in exceptional circumstances, …

DEEPSHIKHA MISRA ALIAS DEEP SHIKHA MISRAversusMADHURLATA MISRA AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepshikha Misra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Budh Nagar to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 1229 of 2024. The High Court, after noting that keeping the …

ANIL JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusKM. LAXMI DEVI AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anil Jaiswal and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Kanpur Nagar to decide a 6‑C application filed in Original Suit No.2306 of 2024. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful …

MEERUT NAGAR NIGAMversusBABURAM AND 3 OTHERS

The Meerut Nagar Nigam filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a civil appeal in which its application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act had been rejected, effectively dismissing the appeal. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a second …

RAJAN SHARMAversusPRIYANKA SHARMA

The petitioner, Rajan Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to expedite the disposal of a pending case (No. 1925 of 2025) filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890. The petition solely requested …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusDEVENDRA KUMAR

The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Civil Judge (S.D.)/FTC, Ghaziabad decide Original Suit No. 994 of 2018 against Devendra Kumar within a stipulated period. The core issue was whether a High Court can impose a time‑bound schedule on a …

RAM CHANDRAversusRAM KHELAWAN AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 12, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 334 of 2018. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …

MAHESHversusSONWATI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner Mahesh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide his original suit (No.1553 of 2025) expeditiously, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s …

SANTOSH VISHWAKARMA AND ANOTHERversusRAMDHARI AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mohammadabad, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 387 of 2009 within a time‑bound schedule. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar …

CHHOTE LALversusSMT REKHA

The petitioner, Chhote Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Banda to decide a Section 6‑C application pending in Original Suit No.18 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose and …

VIJAY SHANKAR TRIVEDI @ DAYASHANKARversusHARISHANKAR TRIVEDI

Vijay Shankar Trivedi filed a writ petition under Article 227 on behalf of a third party, seeking speedy disposal of an application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC that had been pending since 11 November 2025 in Original Suit No. 1315 of 2020. The petition solely requested the court to …

GANGA PRASAD UMAR (DEAD) AND 4 OTHERSversusRAJPATI UMAR (DEAD) AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite Original Suit No. 303 of 1994, which had remained pending for over 32 years. The High Court referred to the decision in Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali Isteba (2015) which generally …

HARIGEN AND ANOTHERversusCHHOTELAL AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City Jaunpur, to decide a 6‑C application filed in Original Suit No. 508 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose and therefore …

SANJAY KUMAR PUNDIRversusSUNNY PRATAP @ SANNI PRATAP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Pundir, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Deoband, Saharanpur to decide a 6‑C temporary injunction application filed in Civil Suit No. 228 of 2025. The High Court, after noting that keeping the matter …

SMT. PRITI SAINIversusSRI VINAY KUMAR SAINI

Petitioner Smt. Priti Saini filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide her pending divorce petition (Case No.1309/2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a stipulated period, alleging undue …

SMT.VIJAI LAXMI DEVIversusGANGA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay Laxmi Devi, entered into an agreement to sell property with the late Jamuna Prasad in 1995 and paid part of the consideration. Jamuna Prasad filed a suit for cancellation of the agreement, which was dismissed under Order IX Rule 5 CPC, and his subsequent restoration application …

SMT VITAN DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSHRI BHAGWAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Vitan Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the lower court to expedite Suit No. 405 of 2021. Their counsel clarified that they were not pressing the original prayer but only wanted the lower court to speed up the pending suit. The …

SMT. SUMITRA BARMAN AND 2 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petition was filed by Smt. Sumitra Barman and two others challenging the actions of the Union of India and another respondent. The petition was heard by the Hon'ble Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal in Court No. 9 of the Allahabad High Court. The Court disposed of the petition by referring to a prior …

DEEPAKversusANIL SINGH

The petitioner, Deepak, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.11, Prayagraj to decide his pending application 14C dated 03.11.2025 in case 2505 of 2025. The petition merely requested expeditious disposal of that application …

SAHAB SINGHversusAMIT KUMAR (DECEASED) AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sahab Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Shamli to decide Case No. 72 of 2023 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of …

GAURAV VERMAversusSMT. PRAMILA SINGH

Petitioner Gaurav Verma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Shahjahanpur, to decide his pending divorce case (Matrimonial Case No. 600 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had …

SUNIL KUMARversusPRAMOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner Sunil Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a civil judgment and decree dated 19-11-2025 and the related execution proceedings, and to direct the lower court to expedite an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The petitioner also requested a stay on …

RAM NARESH PRASADversusMAHESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Deoria to decide the original suit No.70/2020 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

RAJENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusAJAY SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of their civil revision against an order dated 27‑8‑2026. The lower court had earlier granted an ad interim injunction (application 6‑C) in the original suit and the petitioners …

PRITHVI SINGH DECEASED AND 3 OTHERSversusSADHU RAM DECEASED AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Saharanpur to decide Original Suit No. 231 of 2007 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

SUDHIR SHAHversusANUJ MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS

The plaintiff obtained a temporary injunction in a suit, which the defendants allegedly violated. The plaintiff filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC seeking enforcement, which remains pending. A writ petition was filed seeking expeditious disposal of that application. The High …

PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMAversusLALVATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Sadabad, Hathras, to hear and dispose of Case No. 51 of 2024 (Lalvati Devi v. Tarun Tyagi) within a fixed time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s …

RAMPAL YADAVversusPREMLATA

The petitioner, Rampal Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Azamgarh, to decide a divorce case (Case No.99/2018) pending since 2018. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been unduly delayed. The Court examined …

PITRAM AND 3 OTHERSversusCHINKU

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate at Dumariyaganj to decide a temporary injunction application (7-C2) dated 21.05.2026 filed in Original Suit No. 202 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending …

SMT. SANGITAversusMANOJ KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sangita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (North, Meerut) to expedite the pending MAC case No. 246/2024 and decide it within two to three months. The High Court noted that the MAC petition had been pending since 2024 and that …

SMT MUNNI DEVIversusANOOP KATIYAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a third party, filed an application under Order XXI Rule 97 of the CPC in an execution proceeding, which the Executing Court held maintainable. The decree‑holder filed a civil revision against that order, and the revisional court allowed the revision, effectively deciding the …

GAYA PRASADversusLAL BAHADUR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaya Prasad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Duddhi, Sonbhadra, to decide Original Suit No. 107/2022 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. …

YASHVIR SINGHversusSHRI RAKESH BABU AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yashvir Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Firozabad to decide case No. 1103 of 2025 expeditiously. The High Court examined the authority of a constitutional court to impose a time‑bound schedule on a …

SMT. CHETNA MISHRAversusANKUR SHUKLA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Chetna Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑4, Kanpur Nagar to decide a Section 6‑C temporary injunction application pending in Suit No. 2247 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the petition …

POORAN SINGH SINCE DECEASED AND ANOTHERversusSHANKAR LAL AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Pooran Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 8, Mathura, to promptly decide Application 4‑A (RM No. 23 of 2026) for incorporation of the legal heirs' names in the plaint of …

ANITA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusREYASH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

The petitioners and respondents entered into a registered rent agreement on 13‑03‑2015 for eleven years, which expired on 12‑03‑2026. The respondents had obtained a temporary injunction against the petitioners in a suit for permanent injunction, and the petitioners appealed the trial court's order …

AJAY KUMAR PATELversusSMT MEERA PATEL

The petitioner Ajay Kumar Patel filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to dispose of his pending divorce petition (Case No. 1830 of 2024) within a month, alleging irreparable loss due to delay. The petitioner relied on Section 21‑B …

SHISHUPAL SINGHversusVIRENDRA SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Shishupal Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 6, Kanpur Nagar, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 1879 of 2023. The High …

BHOLAversusRAVINDRA AND 2 OTHERS

Bhola filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur to decide a temporary injunction application (6-C2) pending in Original Suit No. 415 of 2024. The High Court found no merit in continuing the petition and disposed of it at the …

SMT BALKUMARIversusSMT NEELAM YADAV AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Balkumari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide a pending recall application (Paper No. 88C) filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 489 of 2016. The lower court …

SIDDHARTH @DEEPUversusDHARMENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur Nagar to decide a specific performance suit (Original Suit No. 1037 of 2019) within a stipulated time. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court …

SUSHILA RANI SAXENA WIDOWversusROHIT SAXENA

The petitioner, Sushila Rani Saxena (widow), filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) IIIrd, Mathura, to conclude Civil Suit O.S. No.525 of 2020 (Sudhir Kumar Saxena vs. Rohit Saxena) within a stipulated period, alleging potential irreparable …

DIPIKA SHARMAversusSHASHANK SHARMA

Petitioner Dipika Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Agra, to decide her pending divorce petition (Case No. 1676 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, expeditiously in accordance with …

SHAMBHU LALversusJAI PRAKASH MAURYA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shambhu Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mau, to decide a pending temporary injunction (6‑C2) application in Suit No. 2055 of 2025. The High Court, after noting that keeping the petition pending would serve no …

DHANANJAI KAUSHIK AND ANOTHERversusANIL KUMAR AND 34 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a judgment and decree dated 18 August 2026 that dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff. The petition contended that the order was appealable as a civil appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Court examined …

RUBI AND 2 OTHERSversusRASHID KHAN AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Bisauli to expedite Original Suit No. 510 of 2022 concerning partition of their father's house and shops and to restrain the respondents from alienating the property. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court …

AKBAR KHAN AND ANOTHERversusNOOR HASAN @ SADIK

The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Muzaffar Nagar to decide their partition suit (No. 388 of 2026) within a fixed time. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautioned …

ARUN KUMAR GOYALversusMD. FIROJ KHAN AND ANOTHER

The respondents filed an original suit in which the petitioner obtained a dismissal under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The respondents appealed that dismissal (Civil Appeal No. 114 of 2024) which remains pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Prayagraj. The petitioner filed a petition …

RAM VILAS MAURYAversusRAJ KUMAR MAURYA

The petitioner, Ram Vilas Maurya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Mirzapur to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 02 of 2024. The High Court examined whether it could intervene and …

REENA SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusLAL JI SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Paschimi Ballia to decide suit No. 1320 of 2016 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautions …

ISHWAR DAYAL PANDEYversusMADAN GOPAL PANDEY AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ishwar Dayal Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fast Track Court, Varanasi, to conclude Original Suit No. 654 of 2023 within six months. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court …

RAM KUMAR @ RAM KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHERversusOM PRAKASH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Kumar and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Civil Suit No. 431 of 2025. The High Court, noting that no useful purpose would be …

SHASHANK SINGH @ VISHAL @ SHASHANK SINGH CHANDELversusSMT. NANDINI CHAUHAN

The petitioner, Shashank Singh Chandel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Family Court in Kanpur to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Nandini Chauhan, in a divorce case under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and to set a fixed timeline for its …

MAMTA SONIversusKRISHNA KUMAR JAISWAL

The petitioner, Mamta Soni, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Varanasi to decide Original Suit No. 299/2017 expeditiously, alleging irreparable loss. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. …

SUSHEEL KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner sought an expedited hearing of an execution case (Section 36, Arbitration Act) concerning an arbitration award that had been challenged under Section 34 and appealed under Section 37. The High Court, invoking Article 227, referred to recent Supreme Court pronouncements in Periyammal …

PARIKHAN @ RAM PARIKHANversusSMT MANJU SINGH @ MANJULATA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Sant Kabir Nagar to decide a pending temporary injunction application (23Ga dated 21.11.2023) in Suit No. 214 of 2020. The High Court found that keeping the writ petition pending would …

M/S MELA HOTELS LTD.versusGHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

M/S Mela Hotels Ltd. filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court against the Ghaziabad Development Authority. No counsel or parties appeared when the petition was listed. The court noted the absence of any party to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed …

ABRAR AHMADversusSMT LALITA RANI KHEDA

A petition under Article 227 was filed by Abrar Ahmad against Smt Lalita Rani Kheda in the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed before Hon'ble Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal. No party appeared before the court to press the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of …

JINAT AMANversusMEHBOOB KHAN

The petitioner filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction and later applied for a temporary injunction, which was denied. He then moved a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the suit, which had been pending for 11 years. The High Court examined …

HARINATH ALIAS HARIversusSAMPATIYA DEVI

The petitioner filed a writ under Article 227 challenging an order dated 6 April 2024 of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghazipur, in a maintenance proceeding under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, 1956. The petitioner sought to restrain the respondent from transferring …

RAM JIYAVAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. Subsequently, petitioner No.1, acting on behalf of all petitioners, filed an application to withdraw the writ petition, supported by an affidavit. The court considered the withdrawal application and, without …

JABIR ALIversusISRAR KHAN AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC in Suit No. 554 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the lower court had …

AJEET KUMAR SINGHversusSMT INDU DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Rasra, Ballia to conclude a suit pending since 2011 within a stipulated period, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court precedent that constitutional courts should not impose time‑bound …

BHOLA NATHversusVINOD KUMAR AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Small Cause Court, Varanasi decide a civil suit (Original No. 139/2023) within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, …

PULKIT BAJPAIversusSMT. MANJARI

Petitioner Pulkit Bajpai filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to hear and decide his divorce petition (Case No. 1894 of 2024) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a fixed …

SHABNAM BEGAM AND 2 OTHERSversusU.P.S.R.T.C. AND ANOTHER

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Agra, to expedite the disposal of MAC No. 591 of 2020 pending since 2020. The petition relied on Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, contending that the prolonged delay served …

TALEVAR SINGHversusNEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Agra, to expedite the disposal of a motor accident claim (M.A.C.P. No. 226 of 2019) pending since 2019. The petition relied on Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Court …

SMT SHASHI ALIAS SHASHI KIRAN PANDEYversusBHUVNESHWAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt Shashi Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Gorakhpur to decide suit No. 1505/2019 within a stipulated time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

INDRESH CHANDRAversusDHARMRAJ (DECEASED) AND 7 OTHERS

Indresh Chandra filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D) Court No. 17, Allahabad, to decide suit No. 379 of 2015 within a stipulated period. The petitioner relied on the principle that the High Court could intervene to …

SARVESH KUMARversusADESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sarvesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Etawah to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 793 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …

SMT. URMILA DEVIversusRAM NAIN AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Urmila Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bansgaon, Gorakhpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7-C) in Suit No. 226 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had …

SMT. BHAWNA GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT. NANDINI DEV AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 792 of 2025. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

DEEP NARAYAN PRASADversusPREMCHANDRA

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, which was pending in a suit filed by the respondent. The petition did not request any substantive relief on the merits of the underlying suit. The court …

RAM VIHARIversusSUMANLATA AND ANOTHER

Ram Vihari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the speedy disposal of Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2021, which arose from a civil suit that had been dismissed. The petition did not challenge the merits of the appeal but merely requested the High Court to direct the lower court to decide it …

SANGEETA TIWARIversusSHRI VIVEKANAND TIWARI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta Tiwari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide her partition suit (Original Suit No.837 of 2022) within a stipulated time. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association …

SHRI KRISHNAversusKAUSHAL KISHORE AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kannauj, to decide Original Suit No. 747 of 2023 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

CHANNO DEVI AND ANOTHERversusADESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Etawah to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Suit No. 156 of 2023. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

GIRISH CHANDRA SONKARversusRAMAKANT AND 14 OTHERS

Petitioner Girish Chandra Sonkar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide his civil suit (No. 3078 of 2022) within a stipulated period. The High Court examined whether it could impose a time‑bound schedule on a subordinate court. It …

INDIAN BANKversusKRISHNA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Indian Bank, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Additional District Judge, Bareilly, to decide a stay application filed in a pending civil appeal (Misc. Civil Case No. 60 of 2026) expeditiously. The civil appeal arose from a suit for permanent and …

MAHENDRA SINGHversusHAKIM SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

Mahendra Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District Mathura, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1028 of 2023 within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had …

SUNIL KUMAR YADAVversusDHEERAJ AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gorakhpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7-C) in Suit No. 427 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the lower court had not yet ruled on the …

KAMLESH KUMARversusMEENA DEVI ALIAS MUNNI DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Etah to decide an original suit (No. 344/2018) within a stipulated time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

SUMIT KUMARversusSMT. BARKHA

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Saharanpur, to decide his divorce case (Case No. 1296 of 2025) within the stipulated period, alleging that the petition had been pending since 2025. The petitioner …

SMT. MAMTA DEVIversusDHARMENDRA

The petitioner, Smt. Mamta Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide her divorce case (Case No.847 of 2025) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which had been pending since 2025. The …

JIYALALversusHARISH CHANDRA

The petitioner Jiyalal filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide his suit (No.1355 of 2023) expeditiously. The High Court examined precedent, noting the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

SMT. MANISHAversusMANISH BHATI

Manisha filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide her divorce case (Case No. 319 of 2025) under Section 13(1)(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging undue delay since 2025. The petitioner argued that the petition had been pending …

SUBASH KUMAR PATELversusSMT REETA DIXIT AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Varanasi to expedite Original Suit No. 1271 of 2025. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which held …

ANKUR YADAVversusSHAGUN YADAV AND ANOTHER

Ankur Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Meerut, to decide his divorce case (No. 1161/2025) expeditiously, alleging the petition had been pending since 2025. The petitioner relied on Section 21B of the Hindu …

ANUJ KUMARversusDR. AJAY SRIVASTAVA @ DEEPU AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Anuj Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kanpur Nagar, to hear and dispose of Consumer Complaint Case No. 438 of 2019 against Dr. Ajay Srivastava and another within four months. …

VINEET KUMAR BAJPAIversusAMIT KUMAR BAJPAI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Allahabad, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Suit No. 1009 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending without …

SACHIN SHARMAversusBHURA AND 5 OTHERS

Sachin Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Amroha to decide his suit No. 20/2025 within a stipulated time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which holds that …

MADHUKAR CHAUHANversusLAXMINA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Madhukar Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of a recall application (Recall Application No. 5 of 2024) filed against an ex-parte decree in Original Suit No. 2301 of 2021. The petition did not request any substantive relief on the merits …

SMT SANGEETA PATHAKversusSMT SARITA PANDEY

The petitioner, Smt. Sangeeta Pathak, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Azamgarh to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 190 of 2023 under Order XX Rule 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure and to pass a final decree of partition of ancestral property based on a …

SACHIN SHARMAversusBHURA AND 5 OTHERS

Sachin Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Amroha to decide his suit No. 21/2025 within a time‑bound schedule. The petitioner relied on the need for speedy disposal, while the respondents did not oppose. The High Court examined the recent …

POONAM KUMARIversusSUBHAWATI DEVI

Petitioner Poonam Kumari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order for the speedy disposal of a restoration application filed by respondent Subhawati Devi in Succession Suit No. 301 of 2023. The court noted that the restoration application was pending and that no substantive hearing …

MEENA DEVIversusVINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Meena Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Prayagraj decide her suit (No. 2421 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State …

RAMAN TIWARIversusARCHANA TIWARI

Raman Tiwari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Auraiya, to decide his pending divorce case (H.M.A. Case No. 60 of 2025) which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay violated the requirement for speedy …

ACHCHHE LAL YADAVversusSUDHA JAISWAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the court’s direction for the speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application pending in Suit No. 706 of 2025. The sole relief sought was that the injunction application be decided within a fixed time‑frame. The High Court found …

WALI MOHAMMAD URF BANGALIversusNAUSE AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Wali Mohammad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Aligarh to decide Original Suit No. 550 of 2025 within a fixed period. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State …

RAMJI GUPTAversusTARA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

Ramji Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kushinagar to decide his 2002 civil suit within a stipulated period. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

SHYAMKARANversusTARABUNNISHA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Naugarh, Siddharth Nagar, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C2) in Suit No. 313 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending for …

MEERA RAIversusSAVITA GUPTA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Meera Rai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2110 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending …

ARVIND KUMAR SINGHversusKAVITA SAHAY AND 2 OTHERS

Arvind Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the speedy disposal of a temporary injunction (6-C) application filed in Original Suit No. 539 of 2026, along with his objection under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC. The trial court had granted an ad interim injunction, which the …

SMT. RENUversusSUDAMA DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Renu, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Sonbhadra, to decide Civil Suit No.138 of 2022 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

RAMPAT AND 3 OTHERSversusSHRIPAT AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought to set aside an appellate order that granted a temporary injunction in a 2006 suit for permanent injunction concerning a disputed property, arguing that the earlier 1996 suit challenging a 1993 will was still pending. The court noted that the 1996 suit, which sought to declare …

SMT. RENU SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSRI RAM BHAROSHI PARASHAR

The petitioners, Smt. Renu Sharma and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of their suit and the pendency of a civil appeal (No. 73 of 2025). In the civil appeal, an application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the CPC seeking a stay was filed and rejected, and a …

RAM MANOHARversusMOOL CHAND AND OTHERS

The appellant filed a second appeal which was later sought to be withdrawn through an application supported by an affidavit of the appellant's son, Prem Narayan, who also represented other heirs. The court considered the request to withdraw the appeal. No substantive legal reasoning was detailed, …

DHEERAJ PATHAKversusNAMRATA PANDEY

Petitioner Dheeraj Pathak filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to decide his pending divorce case (Matrimonial Case No.1155 of 2025) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since …

SANJEEV KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar and others, filed a civil miscellaneous review application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Vivek Prakash Mishra, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the review and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The court …

INDU DEVIversusPRAMOD KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of a civil appeal (No. 43 of 2025) that was pending after a decree against the defendants. The court noted that the petition had no substantive purpose if the appeal remained pending and therefore disposed of the …

NARESH PRASAD JAISWALversusCHHOTE LAL

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge in Varanasi to decide a civil suit (Case No. 67/2021) expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautioned …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Alok Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur to expedite the hearing and dispose of Original Suit No. 71 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the authority of a …

MOHAMMAD NASIM AKHTARversusJOYA HASAN

The petitioner sought a direction under Article 227 for the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gorakhpur to decide a specific relief suit (Writ No. 1312 of 2024) within a time‑bound schedule, invoking Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High …

SHIKHAR JAINversusPRIYANKA JAISWAL

Shikhar Jain filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gorakhpur, to decide his pending divorce petition (Petition No. 170 of 2026) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition …

MOHD IFTAKHAR ALIversusISHARAT KHATOON AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a remand order issued by the High Court. The underlying dispute involved an eviction suit filed by the petitioner against the respondents. During the suit, the respondents moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSMT KUSUM LATA AND 32 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C. Aligarh to decide an application filed on 21.11.2018 under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, which was pending in Original Suit No. 389 of 2015. The petition alleged that the …

SMT. MEERAversusBALCHANDRA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Meera, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a temporary injunction granted by the trial court in a suit filed by the respondents, Balchandra and another. The petitioner sought relief from the High Court, but the court noted that the appropriate …

DINESH CHANDRA @ DINESH KUMAR SARSWATversusKOMAL SINGH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Chandra Sarswat, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Hathras to decide his original suit (No. 197 of 2006) on a day‑to‑day basis. The petition relied on the urgency of the matter and requested the High Court to …

KIRAN DEVI VERMAversusKAMAL CHANDRA MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kiran Devi Verma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of Civil Revision No. 173 of 2024, which had been filed after an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC was allowed to implead her as a defendant. The petition contained no other relief and did …

DHARMVEER SINGHversusBALVEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmveer Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hawali, Aligarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C) in Suit No. 526 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …

NISARversusGULZAR KHAN

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ghaziabad to decide Suit No. 505 of 2020 expeditiously. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2024) which held …

VIKASH KUMARversusPUJA KUMARI

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide his pending divorce petition (Case No. 1080/2025) within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending …

SATYAPAL YADAVversusBRAJPAL YADAV AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Satyapal Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Chandauli to decide Original Suit No. 628/2019, which has been pending since October 2019. The High Court examined whether it could order a subordinate court to expedite the …

JAYRAM SINGHversusHARISH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jayram Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bareilly, to decide a pending temporary injunction application filed in Suit No. 770 of 2023 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that the lower …

NANDLALversusSITARAM AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Naugarh to decide an original suit (No. 117 of 2016) expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

RAJ KUMAR AGRAHARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSMT. SANGEETA KESHARWANI AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 7, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Civil Suit No. 5 of 2004. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had …

OM PRAKASH PANDEYversusVED PRAKASH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) East, Ballia to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Suit No. 849 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

BHOLA AND 2 OTHERSversusMEMERS MUSKAN BUILDBAE MMI COMPLEX

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Mathura to expedite the disposal of Suit No. 183 of 2019, pending since 2019. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

JAIRAM AND 3 OTHERSversusGHANSHYAM AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.15, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 682 of 2018 within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …

NISHANT KUMAR VIVEKversusSMT. APOORVA SINGH

The petitioner, Nishant Kumar Vivek, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide a pending divorce petition (Misc. Civil Case No. 236 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petition argued that the …

YASH GUPTAversusANIL KUMAR GUPTA AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner Yash Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut, to decide a 6-C2 application filed in Original Suit No.203 of 2025. The High Court, noting that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose, disposed of …

RAJARAMversusPRAMOD AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the alleged violation of a temporary injunction granted by the trial court in a suit. The petitioner argued that the respondents had breached the injunction, but the petition did not involve an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC. The …

GIRISH KUMAR RAWAT (SINCE DECEASED) AND 5 OTHERSversusMANOJ BUTIYA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hathras to decide Suit No. 60 of 2014 within a stipulated period, invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

VIPIN PRAKASH PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSHIVA DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) AND 18 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Allahabad to expedite the hearing of Original Suit No. 500 of 2011, which had been pending since March 2011. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive to a subordinate civil …

ALIYA TARIQversusPRINCIPAL BISHOP JOHNSON SCHOOL AND COLLEGE AND ANOTHER

A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Aliya Tariq against Principal Bishop Johnson School and College. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner was not pressing the petition. The court considered the petitioner's statement that the petition was …

SHANKAR LAL AND ANOTHERversusSMT. SABIYA BEGUM AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Shankar Lal and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Allahabad, to decide a Section 6-C application filed in Original Suit No.1707 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending would serve no …

AKHILESH KUMAR SINGHversusSMT. RINKI BHAGAT AND ANOTHER

Akhilesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Civil Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to decide his divorce suit (Suit No. 910 of 2021) within a fixed time frame. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since 2021, causing undue …

NAND RANI AND 3 OTHERSversusSANIYA AND 24 OTHERS

The petitioners Nand Rani and three others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioners appeared before the bench. The court held that no case for interference was made out. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed. The judgment …

CHANDRAKANT PANDEYversusBATESHWAR NATH SINCE DECEASED AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chandrakand Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a High Court direction for the early disposal of his civil suit (No. 1057/2020) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Bhadohi. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

RAMSAKALversusMOHAN AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Mohammadabad Gohna to decide a 2005 civil suit within a specific time frame. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

KANTI KUMARversusGOPAL PRASAD SHARMA, ADVOCATE AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 3, Mathura, to decide an application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC on 27‑03‑2023 in Civil Suit No. 257 of 2021. The petition solely requested expeditious disposal of …

RAMAWATI DEVIversusSANTOSH KUMAR SINGH AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramawati Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), East, Ballia, to decide a pending 6-C2 temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 162 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would …

VAKILversusSHRIKISHUN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Civil Suit No. 912 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …

BABITA RANIversusSATISH PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babita Rani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Meerut to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 242 of 2025, which arose from an application under Section 379 of the BNSS 2023 (equivalent to Section 340 of the CrPC). The …

SMT. NEHAversusKARAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Neha, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court, Meerut, to expeditiously decide a pending guardianship case (Misc. Case No. 35 of 2024) filed under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1980. The petition …

SMT. SHYAM PYARIversusSHEETLA PRASAD AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Shyam Pyari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of the Fast Track Court, Allahabad, to decide Original Suit No. 2127 of 2005 expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments. The High Court examined the …

RAKESH VISHNOI @ RAKESH KUMAR VISHNOIversusSMT ANURADHA VISHNOI

Rakesh Vishnoi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to expedite the pending divorce petition No.3422 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the divorce case had been pending since 2024. The court examined Section 21B of …

SMT SUMAN KUMARIversusCHHOTEY LAL

Petitioner Smt Suman Kumari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Second Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kasganj to decide her 2019 civil suit against Chhotey Lal within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

ISHAM PAL SINGHversusKALLU

The petitioner, Isham Pal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Muzaffarnagar to decide a pending 6‑C application in Original Suit No. 414 of 2026. The High Court noted that no useful purpose would be served by …

JAG NARAYAN PRASADversusVARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint in Original Suit No. 1811 of 2013. The petition sought direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide the amendment …

SMT. KANCHAN RASTOGIversusSHRI RAJKUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Kanchan Rastogi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No.2, Meerut to decide Case No. 397 of 2023, filed under Section 19 of the Specific Relief Act, within a time‑frame fixed by the High Court. The Court examined whether it could …

SMT. FALAK NAAZversusMOHD AMIR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Falak Naaz, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Prayagraj to decide her civil suit (No. 664 of 2021) within a stipulated time. The High Court examined precedent, noting the Supreme Court’s …

DAYA SHANKARversusSMT. REKHA DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide an original suit within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …

AMIT AND 2 OTHERSversusKUMAR UTKARSH AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Original Suit No. 663 of 2024. The High Court noted that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose and declined to …

NARESH SINGH AND ANOTHERversusRAM AVTAR AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Agra to decide Case No. 1164 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to a Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2024) which held that constitutional courts should not …

SANJEEV GAURversusMEERA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjeev Gaur, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Kasganj to hear and dispose of Civil Suit No. 163 of 2013 within a strict, time‑bound schedule. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High …

SHIV KUMAR @ SHIV KUMAR RATHOURversusSMT AMRITA RATHOUR

Petitioner Shiv Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court in Kanpur to decide his divorce suit (No. 3051 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition …