Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
832 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur to expedite Original Suit No. 34 of 2011. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …
The petitioner, Smt. Leelawati, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Kanpur Nagar to decide a 6‑C‑2 application pending in Original Suit No. 1582 of 2026. The High Court, noting that no useful …
Petitioner Bhagwat Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ghazipur, to hear and dispose of Original Suit No. 210 of 2016 expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petition filed by the heirs of Lalita Devi sought a High Court order directing the Nyayadhikari, Gram Nyayalaya, Jakhanian to hear and dispose of Original Suit No. 436 of 2017 within a short, fixed period, without adjournments. The petition invoked the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Civil Judge (J.D.) II, Hapur to hear and dispose of Original Suit No.13/2020 on a day‑to‑day basis. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Civil Judge (J.D.) II, Hapur to hear and dispose of Original Suit No.14/2020 on a day‑today basis. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a High Court direction that the Civil Judge (J.D.) II, Hapur adjudicate a pending civil suit on a day‑to‑day basis. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which restricts …
The petitioner, Ram Kewal Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to decide pending applications filed under Sections 379 and 94 of the B.N.S.S. 2023 before hearing an application under Section 24 of the …
The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide Original Suit No. 103/2010 within a time‑bound schedule. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which limits …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Sen, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court to decide his divorce petition (case no. 258 of 2024) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging that the case had been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Junior Civil Judge of Jaunpur to decide an original suit (No 1273/2003) within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined whether a constitutional court may impose such a deadline on a subordinate court, referring to the …
Petitioner Smt. Sadaf Shafiq filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide her 2017 suit against Dr. Vandana Bansal within a specific time frame. The High Court examined precedent, notably the Supreme Court’s decision in High …
The petitioner, Ritesh Srivastava, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order to expedite the hearing of a temporary injunction application (Paper No. 62‑Ga) filed in the respondent's counter‑claim in Original Suit No. 171 of 2024. The High Court noted that there was no merit in …
The petitioner, Smt. Sweta Rani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2, Ghaziabad, to decide a pending nullity of marriage petition filed under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the …
Petitioner Amar Deep Sonkar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a supervisory direction for the Family Court to decide his divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a fixed period, alleging the case had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that a …
The petitioner, Pratap, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in Konch, District Jalaun, to expedite Original Suit No. 238 of 2017. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Gorakhpur to decide Suit No. 709 of 2015, which has been pending since 2015, within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …
Manish Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Gyanpur, Bhadohi, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Case No. 996 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose …
Petitioner Shankar Lal Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a pending 6-C application in Original Suit No.822 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to dispose of Civil Suit No. 630 of 2016 within a time‑frame fixed by the High Court. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court …
Balwant Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Maharajganj, to decide his pending divorce case (No. 627 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that the divorce …
Petitioner Pratik Shukla filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA), Kanpur Nagar, to decide Reference Case No. 238 of 2024, which pertained to land acquired and an award made in his favour. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Savita Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Chandauli to decide a civil suit (Case No.44 of 2019) within a stipulated period, alleging irreparable loss. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court …
Petitioner Suresh Pal filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑III, Bareilly to decide his pending divorce case (Matrimonial Case No. 1698 of 2025) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition …
Petitioner Muskan Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Shahjahanpur, to decide her pending divorce case (Matrimonial Case No. 31 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce …
The petitioner, Meera Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Case No. 1853 of 2025. The High Court, after noting that keeping the petition pending would serve no …
Petitioner Baijnath filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court to decide his divorce petition (Case No. 1722 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously, alleging the matter has been pending since 2024. The petitioner relied on Section 21-B …
The petitioners, Roopa Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Varanasi, to decide a Section 6‑C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 932 of 2024. The High Court examined whether it could intervene at the …
The petitioners, M/S Annapurna General Merchant and two others, sought a writ directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) to promptly decide a stay application and the pending securitization proceedings against a borrower who defaulted on a bank loan. The High Court noted that the matter required …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Misc. Case No.102 of 2021 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) 6 SCC 267, which held that …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Nishad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1964 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been …
The petitioners, Kusumawati Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gorakhpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7-C) in Suit No. 2277 of 2023. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had …
The plaintiff's suit was decreed and the respondents' civil appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The respondents then filed an application under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal. The High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Cause Court/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad, to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No.470 of 2021. The High Court, finding no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending, disposed of it …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Kanpur Dehat to expedite Civil Suit No. 202 of 2014. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive to a subordinate court under Articles 226/227. It relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in High …
The petitioner, Smt. Ram Pyari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of an application filed by plaintiff‑respondent No. 2 under Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC. The original suit (Original Suit No. 29 of 2023) had been dismissed for want of prosecution because the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), F.C. Ghaziabad, to decide a temporary injunction application (6-C2) dated 04.03.2024 in Original Suit No. 133 of 2024. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hawali, Aligarh to decide suit No. 642/2021 within a time limit set by the High Court. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
Petitioner Abdul Samad filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Dumariyaganj to decide a pending Section 7‑C2 temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 403 of 2021. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending would …
The petitioner, Saleem, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Baghpat to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 164 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the petition pending would serve …
Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide his pending Hindu marriage petition (No. 687/2025) under Section 13(1)(1A) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been …
The petitioner, Ramjatan Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide his 2022 suit and a related application within a stipulated period. The petitioner relied on a recent Supreme Court decision that constitutional …
The petitioners, who are defendants in a suit, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking an expedited decision on a temporary injunction (referred to as application 6C) filed by the plaintiff‑respondents, along with the defendants' objections to that injunction. The court observed that keeping the …
The petitioner, Smt. Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Koil, Aligarh to decide her 2014 civil suit within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar …
The petitioners, Jamal Ahmad and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Dumariyaganj, Siddharth Nagar to decide a 7‑C2 application filed in Original Suit No.302 of 2024. The High Court noted that the petition …
Raghu Nishad filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against Ajay Nishad and others. The petition sought relief despite the existence of a statutory appeal provision. The Court examined whether the petition was maintainable when an alternative remedy under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Verma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Ballia to decide his original suit (No. 2099 of 2021) and a pending substitution application within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioner, Sajid Hussain, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bareilly, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 164 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending served no …
The petitioners, Smt. Chanda Devi and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 92 of 2020. The court observed that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and …
The petitioner, Chandra Shekhar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, Jaunpur, to decide a Section 6-C application pending in Original Suit No. 491 of 2026. The High Court, after examining the petition, found that no substantive …
The petitioner, Ajay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Shahar, Jaunpur to decide a pending 6-C application in Original Suit No. 604 of 2025. The High Court examined the petition and, finding no merit to be …
The petitioner filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide a Hindu marriage petition pending since 2021 under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the case had been unduly delayed. The Court examined …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 193 of 2026. The petition argued that the injunction application had been left undecided for an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) to decide a pending stay application (I.A. No. 2045 of 2026) and the underlying securitisation application (No. 625 of 2025) on an expedited …
Indravati, the defendant, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division)-Vth, Jaunpur to decide Misc. Case No.115 of 2013 expeditiously. The petition arose from an ex-parte decree against her in the original suit. The High Court observed that …
The petitioner, Om Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No.06, Muzaffarnagar, to decide Civil Revision No.97 of 2025, which had been pending for over a year despite dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay served no …
The petitioner, Devnath Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Ghazipur to decide Original Suit No. 90 of 2016 expeditiously. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …
The petitioner, Indar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Gorakhpur to dispose of a temporary injunction application filed on 23.05.2026 under Order 39, Rules 1‑2 of the CPC and the Specific Relief Act. The petitioner relied on the …
The petitioner sought an early decision in Execution Case No.13 of 2023, which remained pending after a decree was passed in 1998 and subsequent appeals were dismissed. The petition relied on recent Supreme Court pronouncements emphasizing the need to avoid inordinate delays in execution …
Petitioner Uma Shankar Rai filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2350 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner, Meera Rai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2377 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner, Uma Shankar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2581 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner, Usman, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) to decide Original Suit No. 73 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mawana, Meerut, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 49 of 2011. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …
The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to dispose of suit No. 1272 of 2024 within a short, fixed period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which limits …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC, which was filed after the defendants allegedly violated a temporary injunction granted by the trial court. The High Court noted that the writ petition had no substantive issue to be …
Petitioner Vinay Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mirzapur, to decide his divorce case (No. 415 of 2024) filed under sections 13(1K), 13(1Kh) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the case …
The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with his possession of a property. The trial court, on 5 September 2025, granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from any interference, including construction activities. The …
A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Smt. Babita Goswami and another seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1398 of 2024. The petitioners contended that the injunction application …
Petitioner Abhay Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide his divorce case (No. 279 of 2024) under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order for the speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application (15-C) filed in the original suit No. 2545 of 2024. The High Court noted that the petition offered no substantive issue for adjudication and that the matter could be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the speedy disposal of an amendment application and a temporary injunction application pending before the lower court in Case No. 636 of 2023. The petition sought only an order directing the lower court to expedite those applications. …
Meera Devi filed a writ petition challenging the securitization proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Allahabad, identified as S.A. No.602 of 2025. She sought a court direction for the DRT to conclude these proceedings expeditiously. The High Court, noting that no further procedural …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Vth, Jaunpur to dispose of a civil suit (Original Suit No. 1654 of 1994) that had been pending for about 32 years. The petitioner argued that the suit required early disposal. …
The petitioners obtained a temporary injunction in a suit, which the State appealed under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the CPC. The State's appeal was delayed, and a condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was granted by the trial court. The petitioners filed a writ petition under …
The petitioner, Jai Prakash, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Family Court to allow him to pay alimony of Rs.2,50,000 in easy installments to his wife, Smt. Suman, in a pending divorce case (Petition No. 581 of 2025). He argued that under Section 13B of the …
The petitioner, Kuldeep Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to expedite the disposal of a pending civil miscellaneous petition concerning guardianship under Section 7 and Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, …
The petitioner, Smt Anno Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D) of Jaunpur to decide suit No. 1351/2011 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The petitioner, Suresh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 3, Mathura, to decide an application filed on 06.03.2024 under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was registered as Misc. Case No. 155 of 2024 in Suit …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Mau, to decide an old civil suit (Case No. 776 of 2016/167 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an expeditious decision of a pending Civil Appeal No.35 of 2026 (Old Case No.394 of 2023). The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and therefore disposed of the writ petition at the admission …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Chandauli, to decide a pending divorce petition (No. 437 of 2024) expeditiously under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been …
The petitioner, Smt. Vimla Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 11, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Form 6‑C) in Civil Suit No. 1519 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Nirnimesh Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to expedite the disposal of his pending divorce petition (Case No. 840 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the …
Petitioner Sanjay Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Hapur to decide Original Suit No.172 of 2025 within a stipulated period without unnecessary adjournments. The High Court examined whether it could issue such a time‑bound directive to a subordinate court. It …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Fast Track Court, Varanasi, to decide a Section 6-C application pending in Suit No.209 of 2022. The High Court, finding no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending, disposed of it at …
The petitioner, Jagjiwan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mau, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in Suit No. 198 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending without …
The petitioner, Mitthoo Prasad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Siddharth Nagar to decide an interim injunction application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC in Miscellaneous Civil Suit No. 17 of 2025. The High Court …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar Chand, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bansgaon, to decide a 7‑C application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC in Suit No. 974 of 2021. The High Court, after noting that …
Ghure Lal filed a defendant's petition under Article 227 seeking a decision on a Section 6‑C application for a temporary injunction that had been granted ad interim by the trial court in Suit No. 355 of 2021. The petitioner also wanted the High Court to consider the objections he had filed on …
Bhim filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Deoria to decide a Section 6‑C application filed in Suit No. 24 of 2026. The High Court, noting that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, disposed of it at the …
The petitioner, Shruti Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to decide her pending divorce petition (No.277 of 2026) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition was pending and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aligarh, to decide an interim injunction application filed in Original Suit No. 723 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose and …
The petitioner, Saurabh Katiyar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide his divorce petition (Case No. 316 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a short period as per Section 21B. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Shailja Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑3, Gorakhpur, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No.689 of 2023) within a fixed time‑bound period. The petitioner argued that the divorce …
The petitioner, Upendra Singh Kushwaha, married Kajal Singh on 12‑12‑2016 and filed a mutual divorce petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, on 03‑09‑2025. The divorce case remained pending, prompting the petitioner to file a …
Petitioners Krishna Kumar Sahu and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, to decide Miscellaneous Municipal Appeal No. 2434 of 2024, filed under Section 160 of the U.P. Municipal Act, 1916, within a time‑bound period. The …
The petitioner, Saiyyad Mohammad Jilani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/A.C.J.M., Court No.17, Allahabad to decide a 6‑C application filed in Case No.150 of 2023. The High Court examined the petition and, finding …
The petitioner, Rohit Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Saharanpur, to decide his matrimonial case (No. 796 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that …
Petitioner Smt. Jyoti Saxena filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide her pending divorce case (Case No. 240 of 2021) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a fixed time, alleging undue delay since …
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the defendants had appeared on the scheduled date. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of the related Miscellaneous Case No.73 of 2011, invoking Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC. The High Court …
Petitioner Devendar Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Northern Meerut) to conclude MACP No. 301 of 2024 within a fixed period. The petition argued that the claim had been pending since 2024 and further delay served no useful purpose. The …
The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Jitendra Yadav after the Court had earlier, in a PIL, directed the petitioner to approach the Assistant Collector under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 to have illegal encroachments on Gaon Sabha land removed. The …
The applicant, Kanhai Lal, had obtained an interim order from the writ court in Writ-A No. 16055 of 2023 directing that he be allowed to resume his duties as Safari Karmachari in Nagar Nigam, Bareilly and that his salary, including arrears, be paid. A compliance affidavit indicated that the arrears …
The petitioner, Jiledar, claimed ownership of two plots in Jaunpur and sought possession after a favorable order under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was issued on 16‑02‑2023. Although stones were affixed on the land, possession had not been delivered, prompting a writ petition for …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 15‑07‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 40628 of 2000. The order was served to the opposite party on 24‑07‑2025, but no compliance was shown. The …
The Allahabad High Court, while hearing Contempt Application No. 9406 of 2023 filed by Parmanand Dubey, referred to its earlier order dated 04.04.2023 in Writ‑A No. 27395 of 2009 which had directed the respondent university to pay the petitioner salary for the period he served as Officiating …
The Division Bench in Writ‑C No.28823 of 2024 directed the petitioner, Kamla Pati Tripathi Boys & Girls Inter College, to submit documents within four weeks and thereafter be given a hearing before a reasoned order could be passed. The petitioner later filed a contempt application alleging …
The Division Bench on 29 July 2024 set aside a final assessment order dated 25 April 2024 and its recovery, directing the opposite party to reconsider the applicant's objections. The opposite party filed an affidavit stating that a reasoned order addressing those objections was issued on 18 August …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad was hearing a contempt application filed by Murlidhar Mishra against Sub‑District Magistrate Amit Kumar Jaiswal. The writ court had earlier directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The …
The High Court, in a writ petition (PIL No.2390 of 2021), directed the applicant to file an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, to determine alleged encroachment. The applicant complied, and the Revenue Team submitted a report on 18‑08‑2025 stating that no encroachment …
The writ court had directed the Tehsildar to complete proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Tehsildar filed a compliance affidavit on 21 October 2024, attaching the order dated 27 March 2024 as annexure. The applicant, Gopal Ji Pandey, filed a contempt application alleging …
The writ court had directed the District Collector to recover a sum from defaulter firms as per a recovery certificate issued by RERA. The applicant filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance. The opposite party submitted an affidavit showing that the outstanding amount of Rs.70,21,712 was …
The High Court, in a writ petition, directed the petitioner, a pharmacist, to file a fresh representation regarding his transfer request within three weeks, and the respondent was to decide it within two months. The petitioner filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that order. The …
In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 4943 of 2024, the applicant Harpal filed a contempt petition against Suraj Singh, Divisional Director Social Forestry. The applicant's counsel, Ramendra Kumar Shukla, informed the court that the order of the writ court had been fully complied with, rendering the …
The High Court had earlier issued an interim order on 11 November 2022 directing the parties to maintain the status quo over a disputed land parcel (Gata No. 180). The parties filed a compliance affidavit on 25 September 2024 stating that no construction or other activity was being undertaken on the …
Vinay Dubey filed a civil contempt application (No. 5056 of 2024) against Rakesh Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Shatrughan Sonwal and Shivendu Ojha, Sr. Advocate, while the opposite party was represented …
The High Court examined a writ petition challenging the State Government’s order that rejected the applicant’s candidature for a Lecturer post on the basis of a criminal case reported by the District Magistrate. The petitioner had initially declared no criminal history when applying in 2015, but a …
The writ court had directed the opposite party, Dr. Vandana Mishra, to complete proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed an affidavit stating that the proceedings were concluded on 31-10-2025, attaching the relevant document as Annexure 3. The court …
Ram Shankar filed a contempt proceeding under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the Kanpur Development Authority demolished his property in violation of a decree in Civil Appeal No.116 of 2013 and without filing a special appeal. The factual dispute was whether demolition …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate, Ravindra Kumar Mander, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Prashant Sharma. The respondent had no counsel appearing. During the hearing, counsel …
The High Court, while disposing of Writ-C No. 18791 of 2024, directed the respondent to decide the applicant's claim for supplies and to issue a reasoned order within a month, with payment to be made within two months. The applicant, Smt. Asha Pandey, filed a contempt application alleging …
The applicant, Mulayam Yadav, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6208 of 2024) against the Divisional Forest Officer, Sri Arvind Raj Mishra, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. Counsel for the applicant, Anil Kumar Shukla and Sarita Jhingan, submitted that the writ order had been fully …
The applicant Smt. Praveen filed a civil contempt application (No. 5517 of 2025) against Vandana, Commissioner Employee Compensation Act, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Avinash Pandey, informed the High Court that the writ court order had been fully …
The applicants, Kush Pratap and another, filed a civil contempt application (No. 2151 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court alleging non‑compliance with an order of the writ court. The counsel for the applicants, Sr. Advocate Siddharth Khare, appeared before the bench and was assisted by Advocate …
Ram Kumar filed a civil contempt application (No. 1194 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court against Sri Naveen Khandelwal and Prabhagiya Vanadhikari, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Ramendra Kumar Shukla, who informed the Court that the …
The petitioner, Hari Shankar Tiwari, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to fix his basic pay and regular salary. The writ court, on 8 December 2020, ordered the respondents to consider his grievance and pass an appropriate order within three months. The …
The applicant, Jas Karan Lal, filed a contempt application against the respondents, including the Divisional Forest Officer of Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The writ order required the respondent to pay the applicant a minimum salary of Rs.18,000 per month from 1 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a contempt application filed by Lakhan Singh against Rajiv Shukla after a writ petition filed by the applicant was allowed on 22 July 2025. The State later instructed that the applicant's fair price shop license had been restored on 12 January 2026, and the …
The High Court of Allahabad was hearing a contempt application filed by Naresh Kumar against Ramchandra Mishra and another. The contempt petition arose from a prior writ order dated 22 December 2017, which directed the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to decide the petitioner's complaint within three …
M/s L.D. Goyal Steels Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the inability to appeal GST orders because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted. The High Court noted that the Central Government had subsequently constituted the Tribunal and issued procedural rules under Section …
The applicant's father obtained a partition decree under Section 176 (now Section 116) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, with a final decree dated 28‑05‑2014. Instead of executing the decree, the applicant filed a writ petition in 2024 seeking removal of alleged illegal encroachments on government …
Mushir Ahmad filed a civil contempt application against Sri Rajeev Garg, Chief Conservator of Forest, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Mohammad Yaseen, informed the High Court that the opposite party had complied with the writ order. The court examined …
The applicant, Ajeet Singh, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Kalanidhi Naithani, Deputy Inspector General of Police. The applicant's counsel, Jitendra Kumar Upadhyay, informed the Court that the order of the writ court had been fully complied with. The Court …
The High Court entertained a contempt application filed by Chheda Lal Gangwar (applicant) alleging that the respondents, including the District Basic Education Officer, had failed to comply with the Court's earlier orders directing payment of his salary and setting aside termination orders. The …
The applicant, Chandra Kumar Mishra, filed a contempt application alleging that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Varanasi failed to decide Execution Case No. 11 of 2003 within the period directed by the High Court on 4 April 2025. The High Court had ordered the judge to hear applications filed …
The applicant, Syed Reyaz Mahdi, claimed ownership of a shop (CK-67/1-R) and the first floor of a building in Varanasi, seeking protection from demolition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. A prior writ petition was disposed, directing that any …
The applicant, Pratap Chandra, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the opposite party, Additional District Judge Rahul Singh I, had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. The opposite party submitted instructions indicating that the writ court's …
The applicant, Shailendra Singh Chauhan, filed a contempt application alleging disturbance of his possession. The State side submitted instructions, and the learned Assistant Chief Standing Counsel, Sri Prabhooti Kant Triapthi, affirmed that the applicant's possession had not been disturbed. The …
The applicant, a tenant of shop CK‑42/7 in Dalmandi, Varanasi, feared demolition of his premises due to a road‑widening project and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus restraining the authorities from dispossessing him without following legal procedure. The High Court, relying on an earlier …
The applicant, Mohammad Sajid Khan, a tenant of Ateek Ahmad, feared demolition of his shop and filed a writ petition which was disposed directing him to seek relief through his landlord. He subsequently filed a contempt application alleging that the district authorities had not acted on his …
Athar Ejaz and others filed a contempt application alleging that the authorities were demolishing their shops in violation of a writ order that required acquisition of land only through mutual consent or under the Right to Fair Compensation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondents filed …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Singh, challenged a State Government order transferring him to the post of Tax Superintendent, arguing that as a Class‑II employee he could not be transferred after the stipulated window without the Chief Minister's approval. The writ court initially stayed the transfer …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar Jain, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6499 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court alleging that the opposite party, Surendra Prasad Singh, Director Employee State Insurance Scheme, had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. The applicant sought to …
The applicant, a tenant of a shop in Varanasi, feared demolition of his premises and filed a writ petition seeking to quash government orders and obtain compensation and rehabilitation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The High Court, relying on the decision in …
The applicant, Ashfak, filed a civil contempt application (No. 2400 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against respondents Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi and another. The applicant alleged that the respondents had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. Counsel for the applicant, Rajneesh …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a civil contempt application (No. 2404 of 2026) against Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi and another, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Rajneesh Kumar Singh. The respondent had no counsel appearing. The court was informed …
Shahnoor Ali filed a civil contempt application (No. 2405 of 2026) against Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi and another, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Rajneesh Kumar Singh, while no counsel appeared for the opposite parties. The learned judge …
The applicant, Javed Akhtar, sought contempt proceedings against the District Magistrate and other officials, alleging that the State had failed to demolish his shop despite a pending road‑widening project. The High Court noted that the applicant had previously been a party to Writ‑C No. 41227/2025, …
The applicant, Javed Akhtar, who was a party to Writ‑C No. 46093 of 2025 concerning the proposed widening of Dal Mandi road in Varanasi, sought a contempt order after the Varanasi Development Authority (VDA) issued a notice on 23‑Apr‑2026. The earlier writ was disposed on 22‑Jan‑2026, relying on …
The applicant, a tenant, feared demolition of his rented house and filed Writ‑C No.113 of 2026, which was disposed with a direction to approach the landlord and the competent authority for relief. The applicant subsequently filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that direction, …
The High Court, while disposing of a writ petition concerning road widening, examined a contempt application filed by Rajesh Kumar Gandhi alleging illegal demolition of his house without notice. The court noted that the house had been sold by its owners to the Public Works Department on 14 January …
The petitioners challenged a Government Order dated 31.03.2025 authorising road widening in Varanasi, alleging that the State was threatening demolition of their properties without proper acquisition. The High Court earlier directed that any acquisition must be through mutual consent or under the …
The applicant, a tenant of a house in Varanasi, feared demolition and filed a writ petition which was disposed directing her to approach the landlord for relief. Subsequently, the owners of the house executed sale deeds transferring the property to the Public Works Department. The applicant then …
The Allahabad High Court examined a contempt application filed by Zafar Khan against the District Magistrate, Varanasi, alleging threats to demolish his house without proper land acquisition. The court recalled its earlier order in Writ‑C No. 41972/2025, which stipulated that demolition could only …
Nizam Ali feared demolition of his house and filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to restrain the State from demolishing his construction, acquiring his land without consent, or forcing him to sign an agreement surrendering the property. The High Court, relying on earlier judgments (Shahnawaz Khan …
The applicant, Mohd Ashfaque, filed a contempt application after a prior writ petition (Writ‑C No. 42786 of 2025) was disposed, directing that his construction could not be demolished without acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. The Nagar …
The High Court of Allahabad had earlier granted an interim order in Writ-C No. 38453 of 2025. The opposite party filed an affidavit stating that the property in question, House No. CK-39/7, is owned by the revenue department and that the applicant had encroached upon it, but no eviction or …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 28‑08‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 29588 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 29‑10‑2025, but the applicant …
The applicant, Smt. Chhohari, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Abhay Raj Pandey, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s judgment and order dated 30‑05‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 18018 of 2025. The order was served on the …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 19 September 2024 in Writ Petition No. 1840 of 2024. The order had been served on 1 October 2024, but the opposite party had …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 19‑01‑2024 in Writ Petition No. 45229 of 2023. The order had been served on 13‑02‑2024, but the opposite party had not …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 05.01.2026 in Writ Petition No. 45063 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on 20.01.2026, but the applicant …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 12‑08‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 9010 of 2019. The order had been served on 03‑09‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party wilfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 29‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 1641 of 2026. The order was served on 09‑02‑2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The …
The applicant, Fagu, sought a contempt order alleging that the respondents were interfering with his possession after a writ court stayed the order of a civil appeal that had upheld Issue No.5, which concerned the cancellation of a sale deed under Section 331 of the U.P. Zamindari and Land Revenue …
In Writ-C No. 57208 of 2014, the High Court issued an interim order on 30 October 2014 naming the first applicant as petitioner; the second applicant was not a party to that writ. A contempt application was later filed against Rajpal Singh and another, alleging they violated the interim order, even …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 12‑09‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 18392 of 2021. The order had been served on the opposite party on 13‑10‑2025, but the …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 06.01.2026 (corrected on 13.01.2026) in Writ Petition No. 19435 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application after the High Court, on 30 October 2025, disposed of his writ petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority due to delay. The applicant alleged contempt, claiming the court’s order was not complied with. The court examined …
The applicant's father, Net Ram, obtained an interim order in Writ Petition No. 9808 of 1985 that barred his eviction from a disputed land. The applicant alleges that the opposite parties are attempting to dispossess him of the property. The contempt respondents were not parties to the original writ …
The applicant, Sita Ram Gupta, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 27.01.2026 in Writ Petition No. 56746 of 2013. The order was served on the opposite party on …
The applicant, Naresh Babu and others, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to punish the opposite party for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 12 January 2026 in Writ Petition No. 3597 of 2022. The court noted that the order had been served on …
The applicant, Ram Ratan, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Sri Abhay Raj Pandey for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court’s order dated 01‑09‑2025 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 19264 of 2025. The order was …
Manoj Kumar filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that Mr. Aziz Ahmad willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 08‑12‑2025 in Special Appeal No. 1187 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 17‑12‑2025, but the court found that it …
Sachin Kumar filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Dr. Rajesh Kumar, the District Basic Education Officer. The applicant alleged that the opposite party had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. Counsel for the applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, informed the …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 25‑11‑2025, as modified on 11‑02‑2026 in PIL No. 2971 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 20‑02‑2026, but …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 12‑Nov‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 37872 of 2025. The order was served on 16‑Dec‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 31‑10‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 37484 of 2025. The order was served on 20‑11‑2025, but the opposite party allegedly failed to …
The petitioner, Kumari Neha Pal, an adopted daughter of a deceased Class IV employee, sought family pension and related benefits. The High Court had earlier directed her to file a fresh representation before the Chief Medical Officer within three weeks. A compliance affidavit filed later indicated …
The State of Uttar Pradesh and another filed a writ petition challenging the non‑constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal under section 112 of the GST Act, which prevented them from preferring an appeal against orders under sections 107 and 108. The Court noted that the Central Government had …
The petitioner, Deep Chand, filed a contempt application after a prior writ petition (Writ-A No. 6942 of 2024) concerning an inquiry against him. The opposite party, represented by the CEO of Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation, filed a compliance affidavit indicating that an …
The applicant, Lalmuni Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Tehsildar Shailendra Singh, had failed to comply with a writ dated 13 March 2024 directing the conclusion of proceedings under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party submitted …
The High Court, while disposing of Writ‑C No. 12392 of 2025 on 23 April 2025, directed the opposite party to decide the applicant's representation if a representation was filed. The opposite party filed an affidavit on 12 February 2026 stating that it had complied with the order and had decided the …
The applicant, Daya Nand Chand, filed a civil contempt application against Ram Jiyawan Maurya, a District Basic Education Officer, for allegedly failing to comply with a writ court order directing payment of a sum with interest. The writ court had ordered the officer to pay a principal amount, which …
The applicant, Arun Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application (No. 648 of 2025) against Shrikrishn Upadhyay, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. Counsel for the applicant, Adv. Paritosh Sukla (with Shashwat Shukla), submitted that the writ Court order had been fully complied …
The applicant Ateeq Ahmad Khan filed a contempt application alleging that the Nagar Nigam, Varanasi demolished his house without complying with a writ order that required acquisition or compensation. The demolition was carried out on 9 February 2026 under a notice issued on 31 January 2026 pursuant …
Obaid Ahmad, a party to an earlier writ petition that obtained a mandamus directing the State not to demolish his property without acquiring title or paying compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, filed a contempt application after the …
Shahbaz Alam filed a contempt application alleging that the Nagar Nigam, Varanasi demolished his house in violation of a July 2025 writ order which required any acquisition for road widening to be effected only through mutual consent or compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and …
Mushtaq Ali filed a writ petition seeking protection of his house from demolition in connection with a road‑widening project, relying on a prior order that compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 must be paid before any acquisition. The High …
The applicant, Alimun Nisha, filed a contempt application after the High Court, in Writ‑C No. 26542 of 2025, ordered that no demolition of her property could occur unless the procedure under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The applicant, Nafees Ahmad, filed a contempt application alleging that the Nagar Nigam, Varanasi, was proceeding with demolition of his shop despite a pending writ petition. The writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39254 of 2025) had earlier directed that any acquisition or demolition must follow due process …
The High Court disposed a civil contempt application filed by Kamran Ahmad against the District Magistrate and others. The application arose from a prior writ petition (Writ‑C No. 26542 of 2025) in which the Court had ordered that no demolition of the petitioners' constructions could occur except in …
The applicant, Siraj Siddiqui, filed a contempt application (Civil) No.1240 of 2026 against the District Magistrate of Varanasi and five others, seeking to enforce a writ (Writ‑C No.15207 of 2025) that had been disposed on 20‑May‑2025. The respondent Nagar Nigam, Varanasi, argued that it was never a …
The applicant, Sameer, a tenant, filed a contempt application alleging that the State and the District Magistrate were proceeding to demolish his shop without complying with a prior Division Bench order. The earlier writ petitions (Writ C No. 12319/2025 and Writ C No. 31841/2025) had directed the …
The applicant, Mohammad Saleem, filed a contempt application challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagar Nigam, Varanasi, alleging violation of a prior writ order that restrained demolition without acquisition or compensation. The High Court noted that the Nagar Nigam was not a party to the …
Mohammad Tariq Khan filed a contempt application against Shri Satyendra Kumar, District Magistrate, alleging that the Nagar Nigam’s notice to demolish his house violated a prior writ order. The writ court, in Writ‑C No. 16448 of 2025, had held that any demolition for the Varanasi road‑widening …
The applicant, Zul Karnain, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate and others, alleging that the Nagar Nigam Varanasi was violating a prior writ order by issuing a demolition notice for his dilapidated house. The High Court examined the earlier writ order dated 26.11.2025, …
M/s Jai Bajrang Construction and Company filed a civil contempt application against Sri Rajesh Kumar, Executive Engineer. The applicant alleged that the respondent had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. Counsel for the applicant, Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay, informed the court that the …
