Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

832 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800

AHMAD BELALversusSHRI SATYENDRA KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Ahmad Belal, filed a contempt application against State officials and the Municipal Commissioner of Nagar Nigam Varanasi, alleging non‑compliance with a notice issued under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Nagar Nigam Adhiniyam, 1959. The respondent, represented by counsel Bipin …

DEEPAK AGRAWALversusSRI. SATYENDRA KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Deepak Agrawal, was a tenant in a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 31841 of 2025) seeking a mandamus to stop demolition of his shop for a road‑widening project. The High Court had ordered that any acquisition must be through voluntary transfer or compulsory acquisition under the Right to …

SARVESH KUMAR DUBEYversusSHRI ABHIJEET MITRA

The High Court noted that in Writ-A No. 11718 of 2025 it had directed the petitioner to present his case before the respondent within three months. The opposite party subsequently filed a compliance affidavit stating that the claim was decided on 29 April 2026, attaching the decision as annexure. On …

ANITAversusR KUMAR @ RAJU KUMAR

Anita filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that R Kumar willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 20‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 40724 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 08‑12‑2025, but the court found that the party had …

SAMEERversusDR PAWAN KUMAR ARUN AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 18 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 14061 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 29 September …

SHRI GAURAV SONDHIversusSMT POOJA RAJGADIYA

The applicant, Shri Gaurav Sondhi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt Pooja Rajgadiya, repeatedly approached the High Court under Article 227 seeking directions to decide a pending 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 287 of 2023. Two earlier writ …

JAYRAM SINGHversusSHRI PRATAP SINGH BAGHEL

The applicant, Jayram Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Shri Pratap Singh Baghel, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 19‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17039 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on …

DR SMT KRISHNA TIWARIversusSHRI KRISHNA

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 30‑04‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 11370 of 2025. The order had been personally served on the opposite party on …

AJAY KUMAR TIWARIversusPROF BIHARI LAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER

Ajay Kumar Tiwari filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that Prof Bihari Lal Sharma and another willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 01‑09‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 1589 of 2024. The order had been personally served on 16‑09‑2025, but the …

RANJITAversusDILIP KUMAR

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 04‑02‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 1629 of 2026. The order had been served on 25‑02‑2026, but the opposite party had not complied. …

BHIKHARIversusAKANSHA MISHRA SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE TEHSIL- TAMKUHIRAJ

The applicant, Bhikhari, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Akansha Mishra, willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 18‑02‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 41565 of 2025. The order was served on …

KARANI DEVIversusSHRI PRAVEEN MISHRA

The applicant, Karani Devi, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Shri Praveen Mishra, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s order dated 19‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 43855 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite …

MUNNA PATELversusSUGNI DEVI, AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad, while hearing a contempt application filed by Munna Patel, examined an interim order dated 20 August 2024 that had stayed earlier appellate and revisional orders dated 26 February 2016 and 3 May 2024 and directed the parties to maintain status quo over a disputed …

MUKESHversusASHWANI KUMAR, BRANCH MANAGER, NAGAR MAHAPALIKA BRANCH

The applicant, Mukesh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Ashwani Kumar, a bank branch manager, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 12‑08‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 11598 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 08‑09‑2025, …

SHAHEED KHANversusAVINASH SINGH, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BAREILLY

Shaheed Khan filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Avinash Singh, District Magistrate, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 12‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 43931 of 2025. The order was served on 24‑12‑2025 but, according to the applicant, …

ISHWARPAL AND 4 OTHERSversusMR AJEET KUMAR SINGH

Ishwarpal and four others filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that Ajeet Kumar Singh willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 22 May 2025 in Writ Petition No. 15553 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 21 June 2025 but, …

DR.RAJEEV KUMAR SINGHversusSMT.RITU MAHESHWARI AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, Smt. Ritu Maheshwari and another, had failed to comply with an order of the writ court. The applicant's counsel stated that the writ court order had been complied with. The court considered whether a …

ABDUL AZIZversusDR. ALKA VERMA, (I.A.S.)

The applicant, Abdul Aziz, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order dated 10 September 2025. The standing counsel for the applicant submitted instructions indicating that the writ court order had been complied with and that a …

KRISHNA KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSHRI RAVI KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the Court’s order dated 1 May 2025 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 1132 of 2025. The order had been served on 9 Oct 2025 but remained unimplemented. The Court found a prima facie case of contempt but, …

SANJAY YADAVversusSMT ARCHANA AGRAWAL

The applicant, Sanjay Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Archana Agrawal, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 20‑01‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 533 of 2026. The order had been served on 09‑03‑2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The …

PAWAN DEEP SINGHversusMR. SANJAY PANDEY AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 9 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 168 of 2026. The order had been served on 16 January 2026 but had not been complied with. The court observed that a prima facie …

AMAN TYAGIversusSMT.KAVITA MEENA

The applicant, Aman Tyagi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt. Kavita Meena, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 7 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 45699 of 2025. The order had been served on 30 January 2026, but the opposite party had not …

ATUL KUMARversusASHISH KUMAR SINGH TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL SHAHGANJ

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 23 April 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 11231 of 2025. The order had been served on 17 May 2025, but the opposite party had not complied. The court observed that a …

RAJESH KUMARversusSRI VIKAS CHANDRA AND ANOTHER

Rajesh Kumar filed a contempt application against Sri Vikas Chandra and another for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court's order dated 6‑Feb‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3311 of 2026. The order was served on 19‑Feb‑2026, but the opposite parties had not complied. The Court observed …

GYAN SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusSHRI ARUN KUMAR

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 9 March 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28267 of 2025. The order had been served on 18 March 2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The court found a prima …

OM JIversusAJAY ANAND VERMA AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 27 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 908 of 2026. The order had been served on 28 January 2026 but remained unimplemented. The court observed that a prima facie …

VIJAY SHANKAR YADAVversusSHRI ANUPAM MISHRA

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 28 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40218 of 2025. The order had been served on 31 January 2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The court observed that …

DR. RAJESH PRATAP SINGHversusSHRI VINAY KUMAR PATHAK AND ANOTHER

Dr. Rajesh Pratap Singh filed a contempt application against Shri Vinay Kumar Pathak and another for allegedly refusing to comply with the High Court's order dated 25‑02‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2785 of 2026. The order had been served on 28‑03‑2026, but the opposite parties had not …

JAGATRAJversusRAMA SHANKAR AND 4 OTHERS

The father of the applicant filed a writ petition seeking a status‑quo order on 23 May 2003 to restrain construction on a disputed property. The opposite parties allegedly proceeded with construction, prompting a contempt application that also named the District Inspector of Schools, Lalitpur as a …

GULAB YADAVversusANISH KUMAR SINGH

The applicant, Gulab Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Anish Kumar Singh, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 18 January 2024 in PIL No. 2637 of 2023. The order had been served to the opposite party on 29 October 2024, but compliance had …

MANTI DEVIversusPARIKSHIT KHATANA, CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

The applicant, Manti Devi, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Parikshit Khatana, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 25 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 29446 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 21 …

RAKESH KUMAR RAJBHARversusPARIKSHIT KHATANA

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 25 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 29387 of 2025. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served on 21 January 2026 …

KUSUM DEVI AND ANOTHERversusPARIKSHIT KHATANA

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 25 September 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 29406 of 2025. The order was personally served on the opposite party on 21 …

CHAHAT RAMversusSMT MEDHA RUPAM AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chahat Ram, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties, Smt Medha Rupam and another, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 18‑02‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5274 of 2026. The order had been served on 23‑02‑2026, but compliance had not been …

VIJAY KUMAR YADAVversusSMT. KRITIKA JYOTSANA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Vijay Kumar Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate, Smt. Kritika Jyotsana, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s order dated 18 March 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 10030 of 2026. The order had been served to the opposite party on 26 March …

SHIVAM MISHRAversusRAJESH PRASAD, C.M.O.

The applicant, Shivam Mishra, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Rajesh Prasad, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 16‑10‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15522 of 2025. The order was served on 04‑12‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. The court observed …

RAM LAL AND ANOTHERversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 7 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 45893 of 2025. The order was served on 22 January 2026, but the opposite party had not complied. The Court observed that a …

BAIJNATH TRIPATHI AND 53 OTHERSversusSRI MODAK RAJESH D RAO

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 19-12-2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12547 of 2025. The order had been served to the opposite party on 12-01-2026, but …

DR MADHURI SINGHversusDR BINDRAWAN LAL SHARMA

Dr. Madhuri Singh filed a contempt application against Dr. Bindrawan Lal Sharma for allegedly refusing to comply with a judgment dated 22 September 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 14307 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party on 29 September 2025, but the court found that the order …

SHANTI DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusRAVI RANJAN, BRANCH MANAGER AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order dated 24‑11‑2022 concerning an auction. The opposite party submitted a compliance affidavit and a discharge application, stating that the bank, unaware of the writ order, had conducted an e‑auction on …

MOHD HAMIDversusSRI SATYENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Hamid, sought to quash a government order and obtain compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, arguing that his shop should not be demolished without due process. The High Court had earlier disposed of his writ petition on …

PRADEEP KUMAR NAIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Pradeep Kumar Nai was arrested on 4 January 2024 after a large seizure of 620 kg of ganja, of which 50.8 kg was found in his possession. He filed three bail applications under several IPC offences and Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act, alleging non‑compliance of Section 50 and Section 52A and …

AKHTAR ALIversusSRI SATYENDRA SINGH, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhtar Ali, filed a contempt application after a writ petition (Writ‑C No.38204 of 2025) was disposed, where the court had ordered that no demolition of his property could occur unless the title was acquired by voluntary transfer or under the Right to Fair Compensation and …

PUSHPENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSHRI AMIT TRIPATHI, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL-MAHA VAN

Pushpendra and two others filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Amit Tripathi, Tehsildar, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 06‑10‑2025. The petitioners sought to hold the Tehsildar in contempt for failing to issue a caste certificate. The Tehsildar, …

MOHAMAD ZUHAIBversusSRI SATYENDRA KUMAR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohamad Zuhaib, filed a contempt application after a writ petition was disposed directing that his shop could not be demolished without consent or acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. The State had purchased and demolished …

DURVIJAY SINGH and OthersversusSRI GANESH KANOUJIA

The High Court had earlier, on 13 September 2021, directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in Writ‑C No. 22240 of 2021. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 12 March 2024 stating that the required proceedings were …

SATISH CHANDRA GOYALversusMR RAJ KARAN NAYYAR AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The court referred to earlier instructions which indicated that no criminal case existed and therefore an FIR could not be lodged. Based on this finding, the court held that the basis for contempt was absent. Consequently, …

SHANTI DEVIversusBAL KRISHNA TRIPATHI ,D.M.AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Shanti Devi after an earlier writ order required the opposite parties to pay dues of the late Laxman Singh. The opposite parties filed a compliance affidavit stating that payments had been made on various dates. The Court examined the …

ANKIT RAJPOOTversusSRI AJAY CHAUHAN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

The applicant, Ankit Rajpoot, filed a contempt application against the Principal Secretary, Sri Ajay Chauhan, alleging non‑compliance with an order of the writ court. The applicant's counsel, Daya Shankar Srivastava, submitted that the writ court order had been fully complied with. The learned judge …

BRIJ GOPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSHRI RANVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Brij Gopal and two others, filed a civil contempt application alleging that the respondents had failed to comply with a writ order. The respondents were served with a contempt notice. Counsel for the applicants, Rajeev Giri, submitted that the writ order had in fact been complied …

ANITA DEVIversusJOGINDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

Anita Devi filed a civil contempt application (No. 2380 of 2026) against Jogindra Kumar and another, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant was represented by counsel Mohitosh Singh. The respondent's counsel was not listed. The learned judge observed that the applicant's …

CHANDRA PRAKASH AGARWALversusAJEET KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 20‑03‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 10684 of 2026. The order was served on the opposite party on 24‑03‑2026, but the court found …

SMT ZEERA DEVIversusPHOOLCHAND @ CHORE AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Smt Zeera Devi against Phoolchand @ Chore and others, alleging that they violated an interim order dated 20 January 2025 which directed the parties to maintain the status quo concerning agricultural land. The interim order, issued in a writ …

SATISH CHANDRAversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the Court’s judgment dated 2 December 2022 in Writ Petition No. 14578 of 2020. The order had been served on 5 December 2022 but the opposite party had not …

SMT MAMTAversusDR VIJAY KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 21‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17564 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on 12‑12‑2025, but compliance …

RADHEY SHYAM SONIversusSRI CHARCHIT GAUR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant filed Writ Petition No. 52714 of 2008, which the court disposed on 14 October 2008, allowing the petitioner to raise his grievance through representation before the authorities. The applicant alleges that the representation remains pending after eighteen years. The court observed that …

JAGRITI NIGAMversusSMT J REEBHA

Jagriti Nigam filed a civil contempt application against Smt J Reebha, challenging an order dated 23 September 2025 in Writ‑A No. 14376 of 2025 that dealt with the petitioner’s reversion from a Group ‘C’ to a Group ‘D’ post and the scheduling of a typing test. The High Court examined the order and …

AMAR NATH YADAVversusPRATIBHA MISHRA

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 14‑01‑2026 passed in Writ Petition No. 34981 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 23‑01‑2026, but the court …

PARSADI SINGH AND 18 OTHERSversusSRI SANJAY PRASAD AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 22 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 762 of 2026. The order was served to the opposite party on 3 February 2026, but …

SMT. ANITA PANDEYversusSRI MANGALA PRASAD SINGH, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Smt. Anita Pandey, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the District Magistrate for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court's order dated 19‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17949 of 2025. The order was served on 10‑12‑2025 but, …

RAMANAND YADAV @ GAMAAversusKESHAV KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a writ petition which was disposed by the High Court on 27 February 2026. A copy of the order was served to the opposite parties on 10 March 2026, but they failed to comply with the directions. The applicant then filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of …

PANKAJ KUMARversusMR SANJAY KALA

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 10 October 2025 in Writ Petition No. 34508 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on 18 October 2025, but the …

RAGHVENDRA SINGHversusMRS MONIKA RANI

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 10 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 12932 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on 27 September 2025, but …

SMT SARITA SINGHversusMRS. MONIKA RANI

The applicant, Smt Sarita Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Mrs Monika Rani, willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 10 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 12928 of 2025. The order had been served on the …

VINDHYAVASINI PRASAD TIWARIversusPAWAN KUMAR GANGWAR-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

A contempt application was filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the District Magistrate for allegedly willfully disobeying a judgment dated 12‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 19339 of 2025. The applicant claimed the order was served on 19‑01‑2026 but remained unimplemented. The …

NIRPATI SINGHversusALOK SINGH

The applicant, Nirpati Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking punishment of the opposite party, Alok Singh, for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 19 November 2025 in Writ Petition No. 17356 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party …

RAM MILAN MISHRAversusSRI GORANG RATHI, D.M. AND 3 OTHERS

The writ court had directed the opposite party to complete proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 5 February 2024, stating that the required proceedings were concluded on 29 January 2024 and attached the relevant document. The …

MANOJ NISHADversusUPENDRA KUMAR, DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AZAMGARH

The High Court had earlier directed the District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh, to decide a representation filed by the petitioner regarding post-retirement benefits within eight weeks. The petitioner filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that direction. The respondent submitted …

VIJAY BAHADURversusSRI RAM ACHHIVAR CHAUHAN, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

The applicant, Vijay Bahadur, filed a contempt application against Sri Ram Achhivar Chauhan, Deputy Director of Consolidation, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Ram Sagar Yadav, submitted that the writ Court’s order had been fully complied with. The Court …

SMT. PHEKUIversusSHRI SHARAD CHAUDHARY

Smt. Phekui filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an order dated 30‑01‑2019 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority …

DEVANAND AND 7 OTHERSversusAMIT KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction from the Allahabad High Court to compel the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Budh Nagar to dispose of Suit No. 652 of 2022 within a stipulated time, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The Court examined prior authority, notably Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali …

SMT. RAZIYA PARVEEN SIDDIQUI WIDOW AND 2 OTHERSversusP.N. SINGH

The applicants, Smt. Raziya Parveen Siddiqui and others, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, P.N. Singh, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 29 May 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 66040 of 2013. The order was served to …

GOMTIversusMRS. MONIKA (BASIK SIKSHA ADHIKARI) AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 29‑08‑2025 in Writ Petition No.11704 of 2025. The order was served on 17‑10‑2025, but the opposite party had not complied. The court found …

RAMDHARIversusSRI ASHOK KUMAR

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 27‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No.2458 of 2026. The order had been served on 17‑02‑2026, but the opposite party had not complied. …

SANJEEV GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusLOKESH M., CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NOIDA

The applicants, Sanjeev Gupta and two others, filed a contempt application challenging an interim order, even though the original writ petition had already been dismissed. The respondent, Lokesh M., CEO of Noida, was the opposite party. The applicant's counsel, Neeraj Srivastava, argued that the …

M/S ISHWARI SINGH DAN SAHAY FAL SABZI MANDI THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NARESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSHRI ANIL KUMAR, PRABHARI SACHIV KRISI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI, DEBAI, BULANDSHAHR AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 20‑03‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6753 of 2025. The court observed that a prima facie case of contempt existed but …

RAM BHOOL SINGHversusDR HARENDRA SINGH

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 11‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 16739 of 2025. The order had been served to the opposite party on 04‑12‑2025, but compliance …

RAM BILAS DOHAREYversusSAMUEL PAUL N AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Bilas Doharey, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 11‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No.18663 of 2025. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been …

GANGAversusRAJESH PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Ganga against Rajesh Pratap Singh and two others. The applicant sought possession of a disputed property and alleged contempt of the court. The Court noted that an interim order dated 24 September 2025 in Writ‑C No.33557 of 2025 did not grant …

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGHversusDINESH SINGH

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 25 July 2025 in Writ Petition No.11182 of 2024. The order was served to the opposite party on 7 August 2025, but compliance had not been …

DR. VIJAY KUMAR TEWARI, PRESENTLY POSTED AS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR (REGULAR), DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICALversusMANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA DIRECTOR OF RAJKIYA ENGINEERING COLLEGE AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 15‑11‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17101 of 2025. The order had been served on 17‑11‑2025, but the opposite party had …

MASJID ABUBAKAR SIDDIQUEversusSHRI PUSHPARAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 17‑02‑2026 in Writ Petition No.6352 of 2026. The order was served on the opposite party on 19‑02‑2026, but compliance had not …

JEET NARAYAN AND ANOTHERversusSHRI PAWAN KUMAR SINDHU

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 15 September 2023 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33776 of 2008. The court examined whether the alleged non‑compliance …

RAM GOPAL PATHAKversusSMT MEDHA ROOPAM

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 09-10-2025 in Writ Petition No. 28198 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party on 08-11-2025, but compliance was not …

NARENDRA KUMAR SAXENAversusHEM SINGH, ADM (FINANCE AND REVENUE)

The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 14804 of 2023 on 14 September 2023, directed the opposite party to decide the representation of the applicant, Narendra Kumar Saxena. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 15 July 2024, stating that the representation decision was made on 30 …

SURESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Suresh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 17334 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking release pending trial. The applicant's counsel, Raj Kumar Khanna and Sandal Khanna, informed the court that the trial had already been concluded, rendering the bail application …

SUMATI SINGHversusKRISHNA KARUNESH, DM AND ANOTHER

The High Court had earlier ordered that the opposite party not dispossess the applicant from a disputed land except as per law. The opposite party later filed a compliance affidavit stating that the order was not violated and the land remained in the applicant's possession. The applicant then filed …

SUKHNANDAN SINGHversusMRS NISHA ASTHANA,DISTRICT INSPECTOROF SCHOOLS

The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 13515 of 2023 on 17 August 2023, directed the opposite party to decide upon the applicant's claim. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 2 July 2024 stating that the decision was made on 26 June 2024, attaching the decision as annexure. The …

HABSONS BUILDERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTDversusSHRI MANISH KUMAR VERMA

Habsons Builders and Infrastructure Ltd filed a contempt application against Shri Manish Kumar Verma, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The opposite party submitted a compliance affidavit stating that Rs. 7,063,242 had been recovered from a defaulter firm and remitted to the Real Estate …

RAM SWAROOPversusDR. ISHTIYAK AHMAD, C.M.O.

The writ court directed Dr. Ishtiyak Ahmad, C.M.O., to decide the representation of Ram Swaroop, the applicant. The opposite party complied with this direction on 20 February 2023, as evidenced by an annexed compliance affidavit filed on 31 August 2024. The applicant then filed a civil contempt …

OM PRAKASH YADAVversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV

In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 4003 of 2024, Om Prakash Yadav filed a contempt petition against Shri Vikash Yadav alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ Court order had been fully complied with, rendering …

RADHEY SHYAMversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV D.F.O.

The applicant, Radhey Shyam, filed a contempt application against the respondent, D.F.O. Vikash Yadav, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ order had in fact been complied with, rendering the contempt …

LALCHANDversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV,DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Lalchand filed a contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Vikash Yadav alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. …

SUDINversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Sudin filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Shri Vikash Yadav, the Divisional Forest Officer, alleging non-compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ court's order had been fully complied with, …

PARDESHIversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

The applicant, Pardeshi, filed a civil contempt application (No. 4012 of 2024) against Shri Vikash Yadav, the Divisional Forest Officer, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the Court that the writ Court’s order had been fully …

SHIV POOJAN PANDEYversusSHRI PRAVEEN KUMAR KHARE, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

The applicant, Shiv Poojan Pandey, filed a civil contempt application against the Divisional Forest Officer, Praveen Kumar Khare, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ court order had been complied with, …

RADHE SYAM YADAVversusSHRI VIKASH YADAV, DFO

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Radhe Syam Yadav filed a civil contempt application against DFO Vikash Yadav, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant’s counsel, Bijendra Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the writ order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. The court …

SUDEEP KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusDR LOKESH M IAS, CEO

The applicants, Sudeep Kumar and four others, filed a contempt application against Dr. Lokesh M, IAS, CEO, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The applicant's counsel, Nanda Kumar Shukla, informed the court that the writ court order had been complied with by the opposite party. On this …

SHAMBHU NATHversusANURAG SRIVASTAVA, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

Shambhu Nath filed a civil contempt application (No. 6380 of 2025) against Anurag Srivastava, the District Basic Education Officer, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order. The applicant's counsel, Satyendra Chandra Tripathi, informed the court that the writ order had been fully complied with, …

SOMAIversusA.D.C.AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Somai, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice on 5 December 2025 directing the petitioner to engage another counsel. Subsequent office reports dated 10 February, 25 March, and 18 April 2026 indicated that no undelivered cover was returned and no …

ABHINANDAN BARNWALversusVIVEK SINGH, SUB INSPECTOR, POLICE STATION KHAMPUR

The applicant, Abhinandan Barnwal, filed a civil contempt application against Sub Inspector Vivek Singh, alleging contempt of a prior writ order dated 11 December 2025. The High Court examined the writ order and the State’s reply, particularly paragraph 8 which set out the reasons for the alleged …

JAGESHWAR SINGHversusSRI SHYAM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER

Jageshwar Singh filed a civil contempt application (No. 1640 of 2026) against Sri Shyam Narayan and another. The applicant was represented by counsel Radhey Shyam Yadav. The Chief Standing Counsel placed on record that a First Information Report (FIR No. 0042 of 2026) had been lodged on 31 March …

PRASHANT KUMAR AGRAWALversusSHRI AMAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.)

Prashant Kumar Agrawal filed a contempt application against Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aman Kumar Srivastava, alleging non‑compliance with a writ court order. The High Court examined the instructions dated 26 March 2026 issued by the Civil Judge, which indicated that the proceedings were being …

ABHIMANYU SHUKLAversusJOGENDRA KUMAR, THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANOTHER

The applicant Abhimanyu Shukla filed a civil contempt application (No. 1663 of 2026) against Jogendra Kumar, Commissioner of Police, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Abhishek Tiwari and Anil Kumar Shukla, informed the bench that the writ order had been fully …

SHIV KUMARversusSRI SHYAM NARAYAN SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANOTHER

Shiv Kumar filed a contempt application against Sri Shyam Narayan, Senior Superintendent of Police, and another police official. The applicant alleged contempt of court, but the State side submitted that a First Information Report (FIR) had been lodged on 31 March 2026 (FIR No. 0043 of 2026). The …

JALBHARATversusRAMANUJ SHUKLA,S.D.O.

The High Court had earlier directed the opposite party, a Sub-Divisional Officer, to complete proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 19 February 2024 stating that the proceedings were concluded on 21 June 2024, attaching the …

RAM BARAN KEWATversusDR. YOGITA SINGH SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Baran Kewat, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Dr. Yogita Singh, Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 27‑09‑2023 in Writ Petition No.32237 of 2023. The order was served to the …

VIJAL DALEL AND ANOTHERversusSHRI MEGHA ROOPAM COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the Court’s judgment and order dated 27‑11‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.41879 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on 04‑12‑2025, …

SWAMI GAJANAND SARASWATIversusSHRI SATYENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Swami Gajanand Saraswati, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 12 January 2026 in Writ Petition No. 39828 of 2025. The court noted that a copy of the order had been …

M/S JAI BAJRANG ENTERPRISESversusVANDANA VERMA AND ANOTHER

The applicant, M/s Jai Bajrang Enterprises, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite parties, Vandana Verma and another, willfully disobeyed a judgment and order dated 27‑01‑2026 issued in Writ Petition No.43316 of 2025. The order was …

RAMPALversusSRI DR. RAJENDER PENSIYA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Rampal, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Sri Dr. Rajender Pensiya, District Magistrate, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 29 May 2025 in Writ Petition No.16610 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite …

RAMPRAWESH GUPTAversusMR KUMAR AMRENDRA, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER

The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act by Ramprawesh Gupta against Kumar Amrendra for allegedly refusing to obey a judgment dated 10‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No.16602 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite party on …

PARVEEN BANOversusSHASHANT SHEKHAR / TEHSILDAR TEHSIL-SADAR, MANDAL VINDHYACHAL

Parveen Bano filed a writ petition (Writ Petition No. 17144 of 2025) which was disposed by the Allahabad High Court on 27 May 2025. The order was personally served to the opposite party, Shashant Shekhar/Tehsildar, on 21 Oct 2025, but the party failed to comply with the directions. Consequently, the …

TARUN KUMARversusASMITA LAL AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 14‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17021 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite parties on 01‑12‑2025, but they failed to …

BHIKHARI DECEASED AND ANOTHERversusRAM SAJAN AND 2 OTHERS

In 2002 the writ court issued a status‑quo order in a land dispute. In 2026 the respondents filed a contempt application alleging that the order had been violated and that they had been dispossessed of the land. The High Court examined whether there was any specific finding showing a breach of the …

SANJAI KUMAR PANDEYversusDILEEP SRIVASTAVA

The applicant, Sanjai Kumar Pandey, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Dileep Srivastava, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 15‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No.7776 of 2025. The order was personally served on 26‑12‑2025 but …

ALOK KUMARversusSHRI SHAILAV KUMAR

Alok Kumar filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Lal Bahadur, informed the court that the applicant was not pressing the application. The court took this statement as an indication that the application was not being pursued. …

ANJANEE KUMAR KUSHWAHAversusMR. RAJEEV YADAV, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL SADAR

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 28‑08‑2023 in Writ Petition No.1984 of 2023. The order was served on the opposite party on 22‑09‑2023, but compliance was not forthcoming. …

SUNIL KUMARversusSHRI DEEPAK KUMAR

The applicant, Sunil Kumar, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Deepak Kumar, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s order dated 16 July 2025 in Writ Petition No.9694 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on …

RAM BILAS SINGHversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Ram Bilas Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking punishment of the opposite party, District Magistrate Manish Kumar Verma, for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 04‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No.11355 of 2025. The court noted …

SANTOSH KUMAR KUSHWAHA AND 3 OTHERSversusSRI DEEPAK MEENA AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the Court's order dated 15 July 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.21107 of 2025. The order was served on 24 July 2025, but the opposite party failed to …

NETRAPALversusRAJESH SHUKL, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Netrapal, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Rajesh Shukl for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court’s judgment and order dated 08‑07‑2025 in Writ Petition No.18022 of 2025. The order was personally …

KALPESH KUMAR YADAVversusARAVIND MALLAPPA BANGARI

The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 28‑05‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17707 of 2025. The order was personally served on the opposite party on 24‑02‑2026, but no …

MATA PRASADversusSRI SATYENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Mata Prasad, filed Original Suit No.1 of 1999 in which a temporary injunction was granted on 29 January 1999. The suit remains pending and the applicant alleges that the opposite parties, Sri Satyendra Kumar and two others, have violated the injunction. The applicant then filed a …

ANITA MISHRAversusSAURABH KUMAR PANDEY

Anita Mishra filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that Saurabh Kumar Pandey willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 03.11.2025 in Writ Petition No.15906 of 2025. The order had been personally served on the opposite party on 17.11.2025, but …