Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

832 judgments · newest first · showing 801–832

ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusKUNAL GAURAV SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SHAHGANJ

The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party, Sub Divisional Magistrate Kunal Gaurav, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 07‑11‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 38485 of 2025. The order was personally served on …

SHASHI KAPOORversusMR RAMESH BABU GUPTA

The applicant, Shashi Kapoor, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Ramesh Babu Gupta, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 21‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 664 of 2026. The order was served on 02‑02‑2026, but the opposite party …

RAMASHISH SINGHversusMR DEVENDRA KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramashish Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 12‑12‑2024 in Writ Petition No.19320 of 2024. The court noted that the order had been served but not complied with, …

AJIT SINGHversusSRI SANJAY MISHRA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL-KHAIR

The applicant, Ajit Singh, filed a contempt application against Sub Divisional Magistrate Sanjay Mishra after a writ court order dated 21.08.2024. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 10.03.2026 stating that the writ order had been complied with and that proceedings under Section 38 of …

GIRJA SHARAN SINGHversusSRI UMAKANT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Girja Sharan Singh, filed a contempt application against Sri Umakant Kumar and two others, alleging non‑compliance with a writ Court order. The applicant’s counsel, Ajay Kumar Srivastava, informed the Court that the writ order had been fully complied with, rendering the contempt …

SANJEEV KUMARversusSRI RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The writ court on 5 August 2025 directed the District Magistrate to take a final decision in the matter raised by the applicant, Sanjeev Kumar. The applicant filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance with that direction. On 13 April 2026 the District Magistrate issued the required …

BLIRAMversusSRI PRATAP SINHG BAGHEL AND ANOTHER

The High Court, while disposing of Writ-A No. 14196 of 2025 on 19 September 2025, directed the opposite party to decide the representation of the applicant. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit stating that the representation was decided on 13 April 2026. The court held that since the …

GANESH PRASAD VERMAversusSRI KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE,

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Ganesh Prasad Verma filed a civil contempt application (No. 1996 of 2021) against Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, Deputy Director of Agriculture. The applicant was represented by counsel Kamal Nayan Tripathi and Senior Advocate Vivek Shandilya, while the opposite party was represented by K.R. Singh. The …

SATYA PRAKASH SHARMAversusPRAVEEN KUMAR UPADHYAY S.I.O.S. G.B. NAGAR

Satya Prakash Sharma filed a civil contempt application (No. 829 of 2015) against Praveen Kumar Upadhyay. The applicant's counsel, Shyam Babu Vaish and Sri Ashok Khare, were not present, although the standing counsel appeared. The court observed that either the order it had earlier passed had been …

BAL KRISHNA GUPTAversusSHRI ANUJ KUMAR PANDEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

The applicant, Bal Krishna Gupta, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party had not paid his salary arrears and retiral dues. The court examined a personal affidavit filed in a related case (Contempt Application No.2193 of 2025) which stated that the outstanding dues were fully …

NEERAJ ALIAS NEERUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Neeraj alias Neeru, who is accused in Crime No.148 of 2023 under IPC sections 307, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27. The first bail plea was dismissed for lack of prosecution, and the applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …

PRABHANAND AND ANOTHERversusRANI GARIMA JAISWAL, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

The High Court noted that in Writ‑C No. 18326/2023 it had directed the opposite party to decide proceedings under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed a compliance affidavit on 1 October 2024 stating that the required proceedings were concluded on 27 September …

SUDARSHAN CHAUHANversusSANTOSH SHUKLA, TEHSILDAR

The High Court of Allahabad was hearing a contempt application (Civil) No. 6210 of 2024 filed by Sudarshan Chauhan against Santosh Shukla, Tehsildar. The contempt petition arose because the writ court, in a prior writ petition (PIL No. 1523 of 2023), had directed the opposite party to complete …

KAMAL SINGHversusMS BUSHRA ADIL RIZVI

Dismissed on merits

Kamal Singh filed a civil contempt application (No. 3477 of 2024) against Ms. Bushra Adil Rizvi. The applicant's counsel, Shalvin, appeared, but the applicant himself did not appear before the court. The bench observed that the order of the court had either already been complied with or the …

MST. KESARA AND ANOTHERversusGANESH PRASAD SINGH AND OTHERS

The appellants, Mst. Kesara and another, were served a notice on 9 September 2025 directing them to engage new counsel for their appeal. The notice was returned undelivered, marked “address crossed, no visible remarks on envelope,” as recorded in an office report dated 1 November 2025 and reiterated …

SARJOO BAIversusVIPIN KUMAR, ZILA BASIC SHIKASH ADHIKARI AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Sarjoo Bai after a writ petition dated 19‑04‑2023 ordered payment of delayed gratuity with 8% interest from 02‑10‑2011. The respondents, represented by the U.P. Basic Education Board officials, filed compliance affidavits showing that the …

OM PRAKASHversusMANISH SINGH, PRABHAGI VANADHIKARI,PILIBHIT TIGER RESERVE

Om Prakash filed a contempt application against Manish Singh and others, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 8 July 2025 that required extending a minimum pay‑scale to Rs. 18,000. The learned Standing Counsel informed the court that the opposite party had complied with the writ order. …