Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

S NATARAJAN

29 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

T.R. KAPOOR & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1989 INSC 26231 August 1989Directions issued

The petitioners, Class II engineering officers of Haryana, sought promotion to Class I (Executive Engineer) after the Supreme Court struck down a state amendment that made an engineering degree mandatory for such promotion. The Court had earlier directed the state to consider all eligible officers and complete promotio

DURAND DIDIERversusCHIEF SECRETARY, UNION TERRITORY OF GOA

1989 INSC 25929 August 1989Dismissed

Durand Didier, a French national, was stopped by police in Goa after accelerating his motorcycle and falling without injury. A search of his bike and attached bag, witnessed by two pancha witnesses, uncovered brown sugar, ganja oil and opium concealed in various items. Samples sent to a chemical analyst confirmed the p

PUSHPADEVI M. JATIAversusM.L. WADHAVAN, ADDL. SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 14129 April 1987Dismissed

Mohanlal Jatia was detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) on the basis of documents seized from his brother‑in‑law and statements recorded by R.C. Singh of the Enforcement Directorate. His wife, Pushpadevi Jatia, challenged the detention before th

UJAGAR PRINTS ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1989 INSC 3027 January 1989Disposed off

The Supreme Court clarified the method of computing the assessable value of processed fabric for Central Excise duty. It held that the assessable value equals the value of the grey cloth in the processor's possession plus the value of the job‑work performed and the processor's manufacturing profit and expenses, i.e., t

R. VENUGOPALA NAIDU AND ORS.versusVENKATARAYULU NAIDU CHARITIES AND ORS.

1989 INSC 32926 October 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged the sale of two properties of a public trust, alleging that the sales were made at a fraction of market value and without public notice. The sales were approved by the subordinate court under a scheme-decree issued in a suit filed under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code, which sought remo

R. NARAYANANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1989 INSC 32425 October 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a freedom fighter, sought a pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme on the ground that he had permanently lost vision in his left eye due to a police lathi charge during the freedom struggle. Although medical certificates and recommendations from the District Collector and State Govern

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusNARAYAN SINGH & ORS.

1989 INSC 21125 July 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed the acquittal of lorry drivers, cleaners and a coolie who were intercepted while transporting fertiliser bags from Indore to Maharashtra without the permit required under the Fertiliser (Movement Control) Order, 1973. The trial court held that the prosecution had not proved mens rea

KALLU ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1989 INSC 31724 October 1989Dismissed

The appellants challenged the interpretation of Section 4A of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, contending that "irrigated land" should be identified only where there is independent proof of assured irrigation and where two crops are grown on the entire extent of the land. The Supreme

VENKATLAL G. PITTIE & ANR.versusBRIGHT BROS. (PVT.) LTD.

1987 INSC 17921 July 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords (Venkatlal G. Pittie & Anr.) sued their tenant (Bright Bros. Pvt. Ltd.) for eviction, alleging that the tenant had erected permanent structures in violation of clause (p) of s.108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and s.13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1974, and

BRIJ LALversusPREM CHAND & ANR.

1989 INSC 13420 April 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Prem Chand married Veena Rani in 1973 and repeatedly tormented her, demanding money and physically abusing her. On 15 September 1975, after a quarrel in which Prem Chand told her she could relieve his financial woes by dying that very day, Veena Rani set herself on fire and died of severe burns. The trial court convict

MUKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

1987 INSC 38518 December 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether stacks of eucalyptus wood sold by the Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, after removal of poles and ballies, qualified as "Timber" under entry 32A of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, thereby attracting a 16% sales tax, or as "fire‑wood" under entry 12, attracting a 3% ta

M.L. JAINversusUNION OF INDIA

1988 INSC 23118 August 1988Case Allowed

M.L. Jain, a retired Judge of the Delhi High Court, challenged the pension fixed by the Pay & Accounts Officer at Rs.26,000 per annum, contending that amendments to the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act in 1986 and 1988 and related Office Memoranda entitled him to a higher pension. The Government of India,

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER & ORS. ETC.versusDR. MEHAR SINGH AND ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 22817 August 1988Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Government had declared certain areas as notified areas under Section 241 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1939 and later cancelled those notifications under Section 244. The office‑bearers of the notified‑area committees filed writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 244, arguing it gav

PRITHI CHANDversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1989 INSC 1117 January 1989Dismissed

Prithi Chand, an 18‑year‑old, was convicted of raping a girl aged 11‑12 years. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, a medical certificate showing a torn hymen and profuse bleeding, and forensic analysis that found blood but no spermatozoa. The defence challenged the admissibility of a carbon copy of the me

ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL OF WEST BENGALversusCOLLECTOR, VARANASI

1988 INSC 4516 February 1988Appeal(s) allowed

The Administrator General of West Bengal appealed the award of compensation for the acquisition of the Gopal Lal Villa estate in Varanasi. The Land Acquisition Officer had valued the land at Rs.200 per decimal, the building at Rs.57,660 and the tree growth at Rs.355.85. The appellant sought higher valuations, solatium

GOPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1988 INSC 10715 April 1988Dismissed

Gopal Singh challenged a notice under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, claiming that 12.35 acres gifted to his adult, unmarried, disabled daughter should be excluded from the ceiling calculation. The Prescribed and Appellate Authorities held that the gift was not made in good faith an

TEK CHANDversusSAT NARAYAN

1989 INSC 27714 September 1989Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a Special Leave Petition filed by Tek Chand against Sat Narayan under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973. The issue was whether the exemption provided in Sections 1(3) and 13 of the Act continues for a fixed period of ten years and remains effective until the suit is f

STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR & ORS.versusMAHMOOD AHMED & ORS.

1989 INSC 13013 April 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jammu & Kashmir appealed against a Jammu & Kashmir High Court order that declared Sections 8 and 14 of the Evacuee (Administration of Property) Act, 2006 to have outlived their utility and directed that no future applications under Section 8 be entertained. The dispute arose from a sale of a property that

ALLAUDDIN MIAN & ORS. SHARIF MIAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1989 INSC 13113 April 1989Case Partly allowed

The appellants, six members of an unlawful assembly, were convicted for the murder of two infant girls while attempting to kill the father, Baharan Mian. The trial court sentenced the two principal assailants (Accused Nos. 1 and 2) to death and the others to life imprisonment, later altering some convictions under Sect

SHIVAJI DAYANU PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1989 INSC 20112 July 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Shivaji Patil was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Tulashiram Sutar. The prosecution's case rested solely on the testimony of the deceased's wife, Parvatibai, who claimed to have seen Patil strike her husband with a stick but did not disclose his identity to the police or anyone else

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

1988 INSC 7311 March 1988Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board was required under the Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962 to insure its distribution and transmission lines against war‑risk damage. The Director of the Emergency Risks Insurance Scheme fixed a balance premium of Rs 47,59,109, which the Board contested on four gro

G. RAMEGOWDA, MAJOR, ETC.versusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE.

1988 INSC 7110 March 1988Dismissed

The appellants challenged a Mysore High Court order that condoned substantial delays in filing appeals against land acquisition awards, invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. They argued that the delay, caused by negligence of Government Pleaders, could not be deemed "sufficient cause" and that the condonation

SURINDER KUMARversusUNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

1989 INSC 818 March 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Surinder Kumar was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing PW 2 and his brother Nitya Nand, who died. He appealed, claiming the incident was a sudden quarrel and that Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC applied, reducing the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The Supreme Court examined the

N. ABDUL BASHEER & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusK.K. KARUNAKARAN & ORS.

1989 INSC 1815 May 1989Dismissed

Non‑graduate Excise Preventive Officers challenged an amendment to Special Rule 2 of the Kerala Excise & Prohibition Subordinate Service Rules that introduced a 1:3 ratio favouring graduates for promotion to Second Grade Excise Inspector. The Kerala High Court and a Division Bench held the amendment violated Articles 1

FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD.versusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANOTHER

1988 INSC 1415 May 1988Dismissed

Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd entered into a 1948 agreement with the princely State of Travancore for electricity at a fixed rate, later succeeded by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). In 1968 KSEB raised the tariff for the appellant to Rs.200 per kW per year under Regulation 11 of the 1966 General Tar

HARI DUTI BHARDWAJversusHARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD, PUNCHKULA & ANR.

1989 INSC 1611 May 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board contracted a builder to construct an office building and stipulated that any dispute would be arbitrated by the Board's Superintending Engineer. Shri D.P. Gupta was appointed arbitrator, but the Board's Chairman ordered his reversion to his parent department on 4 April 198

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search