Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
213 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Jabir Ali, claimed retrenchment and initiated an industrial dispute (Industrial Case No. 47 of 2006). The Labour Court awarded his reinstatement with full back wages, later modified by the High Court to 50% back wages in Writ Petition No. 22591 of 2008. He was reinstated in March …
M/s Nk Traders filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 28‑03‑2026 issued by the State under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2019‑20. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file …
The appellant, a former Assistant Clerk, was suspended in 1996 and served a charge‑sheet but was not provided the relevant documents despite repeated requests. An enquiry report was filed on 28‑Feb‑1997 without any oral inquiry or evidence, leading to a penalty of reversion to basic pay with loss of …
The petitioner, M/s Sat Guru Kripa Agency, filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte order dated 11.11.2025 that cancelled its registration under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …
M/s Bharat Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 29‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2018‑19. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …
Petitioner Ajai Sharma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to Respondent No.2 to decide his application for early hearing of an appeal filed on 27.08.2026. The petition argued that the application required expeditious consideration. The Court observed that the petitioner had already filed the …
The petitioner, Veer Singh, a farmer, challenged an order dated 25 June 2026 issued by the Chairperson of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, alleging that it was not appealable. The revenue raised a preliminary objection that the order was indeed appealable and that the petitioner must first exhaust …
The appellant, Hari Om Singh, filed a special appeal (No. 1117 of 2026) challenging the order dated 27 July 2026 passed in Writ A No. 10879 of 2026. The appeal sought relief against the said order. The Court examined whether the special appeal was maintainable under the applicable procedural law. It …
The petitioner, Munna Lal, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petition incorrectly described the fourth respondent, a finance corporation, using multiple former names and an unintelligible description, despite a prior order allowing time to properly …
The petitioner, Sanjay Agrawal, challenged an order dated 07.05.2026 passed under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (UPGST) Act, 2017, before the Allahabad High Court. The court examined whether it could interfere with the order on its merits and considered the limitation period …
Shueb Akhtar challenged the cancellation of his registration under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, effected by a system‑generated notice dated 05.02.2026 and an order dated 06.04.2026. The petitioner argued that the notice, being issued by the computer system without the name, …
The petitioner, M/s Air Expert India, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 29 October 2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax Jurisdiction Sector‑4, which allegedly denied its right to appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. The petition sought a certiorari to quash the …
M/s Rana Builders filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of its registration under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which was based on a system‑generated notice dated 16‑04‑2025 and an order dated 03‑07‑2025. The petitioners argued that the notice, issued by the GSTN …
M/s Vimal Plast India (P) Ltd filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 21‑12‑2023 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2017‑18. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file a statutory appeal within the …
The petitioners, M/s Keshari Traders, filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte adjudication order dated 10‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the FY 2018‑19. They argued that they were unaware of the order and therefore could not file the …
M/S Malti Lawns challenged an order dated 26‑03‑2026 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, invoking Sections 74, 122 and 125 of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 for the financial years 2019‑20 to 2021‑22. The petitioner argued that the limitation period for filing an appeal …
M/s PMG & Associates filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte adjudication order dated 17 May 2024 passed under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the FY 2021‑22. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory …
Dynamic Realcon Private Ltd challenged the cancellation of its registration under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, which was based on a system‑generated notice that lacked the name, office, and digital signature of the issuing authority. The High Court examined an earlier decision (M Y Ent Bhatta v. …
The appellant, Smt. Rita Verma, challenged a suspension order dated 24 July 2026 by filing a writ petition, which was dismissed by a Single Judge on 2 September 2026. She appealed the dismissal, arguing that the suspension was unwarranted and that she should be allowed to remain posted at Kanpur …
The case involved an exemption application filed by Sh. Chandra Prakash Goel against the assessment of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The Commissioner appealed the exemption, arguing that the relief was not warranted under the Income Tax Act. The High Court heard the appeal together with …
The revenue appealed against Tribunal orders that had allowed the assessee, Sh. Chandra Prakash Goel, to set aside assessment orders for AY 2010-11 and 2011-12 on the basis of differing valuation reports. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could rely on the Approved Valuer’s report and …
Padamdhar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by senior counsel N.C. Gupta, assisted by Arjit Gupta, while the revenue side was represented by Standing Counsel Ankur Agarwal. The …
Gulbahar Abdul Ali filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09.04.2026 issued by the respondent under Section 161 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The order was deemed a non‑speaking order, merely reproducing facts and the statutory provision without reasoning, and it …
The High Court considered an appeal by ex‑Constable Om Prakash Gautam challenging a penalty order that dismissed him from service, which had been confirmed by an appeal order and earlier dismissed in a writ petition. The appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the special appeal and a …
M/S Modern Metals Overseas filed a writ petition challenging the Director General of Foreign Trade's rejection of its waiver application dated 20‑12‑2025 under the third proviso of Section 15(1) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The court examined whether the authority …
M/S Superior Metal Overseas filed a writ petition challenging the Director General of Foreign Trade's (DGFT) order rejecting its waiver application dated 20-12-2025. The petitioner sought a waiver under the third proviso to Section 15(1) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, …
M/s Rahul Construction filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte adjudication order dated 23‑03‑2026 passed under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2019‑20. The petitioner argued that it could not appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order, …
M/s Kaka Stores filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 08‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2018‑19. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the prescribed …
The Allahabad High Court dismissed an intra‑court appeal challenging a suspension order dated 17‑02‑2026 imposed on Rajesh Kumar, a employee of the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation. The appellant argued that the suspension violated Rule 4 of the Corporation’s Discipline and Appeal Regulations, 2020, …
M/S Sunil Battery Service filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 13‑08‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2019‑20. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …
The appellant, Jay Prakash, filed a special intra‑Court appeal challenging a penalty imposed on him in disciplinary proceedings that had concluded during the pendency of the appeal. The appellant sought leave of the High Court to contest the penalty order. The respondent State of U.P. and others did …
The appellant, Raj Kumar Singh, filed a withdrawal application for his appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel, Anil Kumar Bajpai, submitted the application, and the standing counsel, Birendra Prasad Shukla, raised no objection. The court allowed the withdrawal application. …
The Committee of Management of two colleges filed special appeals (defective) challenging interlocutory orders that protected the interim employment of regularised employees for over ten years. The appellants sought exemption from filing fees and condonation of a 22‑day delay in filing the appeals. …
The Allahabad High Court heard an intra‑court appeal by Ram Kawal Yadav challenging an order dated 11 May 2026 that dismissed his writ petition. The court found a fundamental error on principle because the institution involved had been upgraded from a Junior High School to an Intermediate College, …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, applied for the issuance of Form F.L.7, which was pending before the second respondent. An adverse report dated 02‑06‑2026 was made by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gorakhpur, and a copy was provided to the petitioner. The High Court, without examining the …
The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others appealed against the order of a single judge dated 25 May 2026 granting Dinesh Chand Pandey appointment as Library/Lab Bearer and directing the respondents to honor his appointment. The appellant sought to set aside the judgment, arguing procedural and …
Petitioner Etah Wine Traders AOP filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to contain incurable defects in its pleadings. Counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition and be allowed to file a fresh one. The respondents, representing the …
The petitioner, M/s Shri Raghav Anna Bhandar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 07.05.2026 passed by the State of U.P. and others. The High Court examined whether the order was appealable and whether the petition was barred by limitation. The …
M/s Yameen Ent Udyog filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑02‑2026 passed by the State of U.P. The Court examined whether the order was appealable and whether the petition was barred by limitation. It held that the order is appealable and no jurisdictional error exists to warrant …
Petitioner Ram Mohan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the University of Medical Science, Saifai, to issue a disability certificate based on a medical test conducted on 5 August 2026. The University produced a written instruction indicating that the medical board found the …
Umesh Kumar Sharma appealed a single judge's dismissal of his writ petition challenging his non‑transfer under Clause 3(2) of the Transfer Policy Act. He had been posted at Etawah since 7 November 2025, less than a year, and argued that a junior colleague was transferred before him, violating the …
Mukesh Kumar Jain challenged an adjudication order dated 21‑April‑2026 passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 74 of the CGST Act, arguing that his GST registration was cancelled on 5‑Sept‑2023 and the show‑cause notice was served only electronically on 25‑June‑2025, leaving him unaware …
The petitioner, Mohammad Naushad Ansari, had his GST registration cancelled on 31 March 2022. A show‑cause notice was issued only through the Common Portal on 19 September 2025, long after the cancellation, and the petitioner did not receive any physical notice. Consequently, he was unaware of the …
M/s Nanna Traders filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 07.08.2024 passed under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2022-23. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …
Petitioner Kanti Kaushik filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 15‑04‑2024 issued under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and a subsequent order under Section 154, both relating to Assessment Year 2017‑18. The revenue department admitted that the information prompting …
The appellants filed an intra‑court appeal 64 days after the single judge’s order dismissing their writ petition, seeking condonation of the delay. The court found the cause shown sufficient and allowed the delay condonation. The appeal challenged the dismissal, which was based on a Supreme Court …
Vinay Pathak filed a writ petition seeking relief from road tax recovery for his vehicle (registration UP 54 T 8131) for the period December 2022 to May 2026, asserting that the vehicle was a total loss after a road accident and therefore unusable. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that the tax …
M/S Rmv Motels LLP filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31.12.2025 passed by Respondent No.4 under Section 74 of the CGST/UTGST Act, 2017 concerning assessments for FY 2018-19 and 2019-20. The revenue counsel raised a preliminary objection that the order was appealable, while the …
Mahi Construction filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of its registration under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, based on a system‑generated notice dated 14‑08‑2025 that lacked the name, office or digital signature of any authorized officer. The High Court examined whether a notice …
Smt. Uma Bishnoi filed a writ petition seeking regularization in service under Section 33-G(d) of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982. The single judge dismissed the petition, noting the petitioner had not shown evidence of regular work and granted a liberty to approach …
M/S Solanki Construction filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 2112 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and two other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Ravi Kant Verma, while the respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., C.S.C. The Court, …
M/s Shubham Agencies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of …
The petition filed by Mohammed Salim against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2026:AHC:190551-DB. No …
The petition filed by Abdul Rehman Traders was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that the orders be as per the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2026:AHC:190551-DB.
M/s Jbg Marketing And Solution filed a writ petition (Tax No. 2912 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petition was presented by counsel Vishwas Pandey, Vivek Mishra and Yashwant Prasad, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. …
The petition M/s M.A.R. Construction Company filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. Counsel for the petitioner were Nisha …
The petition filed by M/s Suraj Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that orders be as per the decision in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2026:AHC:190551‑DB). No substantive findings on facts …
The petition filed by M/s Surya Associates against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The judgment refers the parties to the order passed in the case of M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB) for the …
The petition filed by M/s Ramji Sanitech Private Limited against the Union of India was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The judgment contains no detailed findings of fact or legal reasoning and directs the parties to refer to the order in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises v. State of Uttar …
M/s Ramji Sanitech Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to follow the order issued in M/s …
M/s Jbg Marketing And Solution filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3054 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The counsel for the petitioner were Vishwas …
Idrawati Devi and five others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition sought relief under the writ jurisdiction, the specific grounds of which are not detailed in the order. The Court, after hearing the parties, …
M/s Bareilly Chemicals Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was listed before a bench of Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition without …
The petition filed by M/s G4c Management Private Limited was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that any further orders be in accordance with the order dated in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB). No substantive factual or …
The petition filed by Paradise Hospitality Services against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was heard by a bench of Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The petition was disposed of by the court. The court directed that for any orders, reference should be made to the order …
Petitioner M/s Anya Polytech and Fertilizers Limited filed Writ Tax No. 3296 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The specific relief sought is not detailed in the excerpt. The Court, after hearing counsel Pranjal Shukla and Priyanshu Kesarwani for the petitioner and C.S.C. for the respondents, …
The writ petition filed by M/s Anya Polytech And Fertilizers Limited against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court did not elaborate on facts or legal reasoning in this brief order, and instead directed reference to the order dated in the case …
M/s Anya Polytech and Fertilizers Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was listed before Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing that the …
M/s Supreme Steel And Alloys Khasra filed a writ petition against the Union of India and three other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Nishant Mishra and Ojasvi Gupta, while the respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Dhananjay Awasthi, and Priyanka Midha. The matter was …
M/s Shivam Ent Udhyog filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3332 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petitioners were represented by counsel Aditya Pandey and Himanshu Mishra, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. …
M/s Shivam Ent Udhyog filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition without a detailed discussion, directing the parties …
The petition filed by M/s Khwaja Int Udhyog was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The Court directed that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2026:AHC:190551-DB. No substantive facts or arguments were elaborated in …
The petition filed by M/s Sk Builders against the State of U.P. was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The Court directed that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB). No substantive facts or issues …
M/s Rishabh Constructions Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. Counsel for the petitioner was Pooja Talwar, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. The matter was heard by Hon'ble Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. …
A writ petition filed by M/s Rishabh Constructions Pvt Ltd against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others was heard before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, the specifics of which are not detailed in the judgment. The Court observed that the matter had …
M/s Hanzala Brick Field filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The Allahabad High Court disposed of the petition. The court directed that any orders be taken from the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, …
M/s Sunrise Industrial Services filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to refer to the order …
Sr Enterprises filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Pankaj Kumar Singh and Sudhanshu Yadav, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. The matter was heard by …
M/s Laxmi Electric And Motor Winding Work filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petition was heard by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The Court disposed of the petition without …
The petition filed by Asaragreen Infratech Private Limited against the State of Uttar Pradesh was filed under writ tax No. 3543 of 2026. The petitioners were represented by counsel Raja Sahani and the respondents by C.S.C. The matter was heard by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. …
The petitioners M/s Rst Infocom Private Limited filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3481 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and four others. The petition was heard by a division bench of Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of …
M/s Rst Infocom Private Limited filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to refer to the order in M/s Maa Gayatri …
M/s Rahmat Traders filed a writ petition (Tax No. 3501 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by Hon’ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, …
M/s S R D Traders filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3554 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court noted that the order to be passed would be the same as that in M/s Maa …
Indu Creations filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing that the orders be …
The petition filed by M/S Dr. Ambedkar Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. No substantive facts, issues, or reasoning were set out in the judgment. The court directed that the orders be taken from a related case, M/s Maa Gayatri …
The petition filed by M/S Dr. Ambedkar Enterprises was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The order refers the parties to the order dated in the case of M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another. No detailed facts, issues, or reasoning are provided in the judgment …
M/s Dr Ambedkar Enterprises filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a tax matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to refer to …
The petition filed by M/s Dr. Ambedkar Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was heard by the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the orders in the matter are to be taken from the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, …
M/s Kesarwani Traders filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court noted that the order for the case would be as per the order dated in M/s …
M/s Raj Infratech filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3559 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. No detailed facts or legal arguments …
M/s Raj Infratech filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was disposed of by the bench comprising Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court did not elaborate on facts or reasoning but …
M/s Safi Steels & Traders filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was presented by counsel Pranjal Shukla, while the State was represented by C.S.C. The Bench consisting of Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi disposed of the …
M/s Saifi Steels and Traders filed writ petition No. 3650 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition sought relief, though the specific relief sought is not detailed in the order. The matter was heard by a bench …
The petition filed by M/S Job Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The order directs the parties to refer to the order dated in the case of M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB) for …
The petitioners, M/s Balaji Tiles and Sanitary, filed writ petition No. 3594 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought relief against the respondents, though the specific relief sought is not detailed in …
M/s Kesarwani Traders filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the petition, directing that the orders be as per the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. …
M/s Ishika Traders filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3628 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by a bench of Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, …
The petition filed by M/s Shri Sharma Medical Hall against the State of U.P. and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court did not elaborate on facts or reasoning, directing that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh …
The petition was filed by M/s A.J. Industries through its proprietor Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh challenging a decision of the State Tax Officer. The respondents were the State Tax Officer and another party. Counsel for the petitioner were Nitin Kumar Kesarwani and Shubhanjali Gupta, while the respondent …
Affinity Comsol Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29‑04‑2024 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2018‑19, alleging it missed the statutory time‑limit for filing an appeal due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State argued that a …
Affinity Comsol Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28‑08‑2024 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2019‑2020. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within …
The petition filed by M/s Saurabh Enterprises challenged an order dated 27‑02‑2025 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2020‑21, contending that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutorily prescribed appeal within the …
M/s Saurabh Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑12‑2023 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2017‑18. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …
The petitioners, Renewable Energy, challenged an order dated 30‑12‑2025 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2021‑22, arguing that they were unaware of the order and thus missed the statutory time limit for filing an appeal. The State contended that the …
M/S Vk Constructions filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑08‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2022‑23, alleging it could not file a statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State argued that …
M/S Vk Constructions filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑08‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2022‑23, alleging that it could not file a statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State …
M/S Vk Constructions filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑08‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2022‑23, alleging it could not file the statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order. The State contended that …
Mithilesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 04‑08‑2023 issued by the State under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2020‑21, alleging that he could not file a statutory appeal within the prescribed limitation period. The State argued that the …
The petitioner, Niyati Enterprises, challenged the cancellation of its GST registration under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, on the ground that the notice and subsequent order were issued by a computer system without the name, office, or digital signature of an authorized officer. The High Court …
The petitioner, Mohd. Nazim, challenged the Assistant Commissioner's order dated 24‑08‑2026 rejecting his application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration. The order merely directed him to produce documents and devices for verification but failed to record any substantive reasons for …
The petitioner, Mohd. Qamar, sought revocation of a cancellation of his GST registration dated 17 July 2026. After an earlier writ petition was disposed, he applied on 11 August 2026, and the respondent issued a show‑cause notice on 14 August directing him to produce original documents and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a refund of road tax paid for a vehicle (Regn. No. UP27‑BM‑4035) after the Government, on 28 June 2024, announced exemption from road tax for various hybrid electric vehicles. The court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to a refund of the tax …
The petitioner, M/s Qazi Engineering Pvt. Ltd., paid road tax for a vehicle (Regn. No. UP78-HE-7860) before the Government's June 28, 2024 decision exempting hybrid electric vehicles from road tax. After the exemption, the petitioner sought a refund of the tax paid. The Court examined the …
The appellant, Smt. Kusum Pandey, filed an intra‑court appeal challenging a single judge’s order dated 5 August 2026. She had previously applied for a compassionate appointment on two occasions and was finally granted such appointment by an order dated 29 March 2022. The appeal contended that the …
The petitioners, Smt Aasha Prabha Jain and two others, filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 13‑08‑2026 issued by the respondents, the State of UP and two others. The petition sought relief against any coercive action pending the resolution of the notice. The Court, without …
M/S Sameer Medical Agency challenged an adjudication order dated 26.03.2026 issued by the State of U.P., filing a writ petition (WTAX No. 3701 of 2026) after earlier proceedings were set aside and a hearing was ordered. The petitioner participated, filed a reply, and sought an adjournment which was …
The petitioners, Deep Singh Charitable Society and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Shri Saurav Pandey, informed the court that the matter had become infructuous. The petitioners consequently requested that the petition …
The petitioner, Vinayak Nirman Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Sr. Advocate Utkarsh Khanna, informed the Court that the petitioner …
The petitioner, M/s Hotel Ashoka Ocean, sought a mandamus directing the GST authorities to add a surviving partner as promoter on the GST portal, decide pending representations, and refund an excess deposit of Rs.4,14,000. The GST registration had been cancelled and the authorized signatory had …
Petitioners Sanjay Sherawat and another challenged an adjudication order dated 25‑03‑2026 that imposed a penalty under section 122(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. They submitted a supplementary affidavit showing that they had resigned as directors of M/s Daurli Ispat Pvt Ltd on the dates specified, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad in the name of the deceased, Mithlesh Shakya, seeking relief against the State of U.P. No amendment application was filed, and the stamp reporter did not note any defect. The court examined whether a petition filed in the name of a …
Ram Krishna, a Collection Ameen, failed to meet his annual collection target, recovering less than half the required amount, and was suspended for about a month. A domestic inquiry was conducted, after which he was penalised with the loss of two increments and a censure entry. The appellant …
The appellant Ram Kumar filed a special appeal against an interlocutory order dated 22 July 2026 issued in Writ-A No.10614 of 2026. The court examined the preliminary objection raised by the respondents and found it to be valid. Consequently, the appeal was held to be not maintainable as it …
Salh Industries challenged an adjudication order dated 5 December 2025 issued under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The company's GST registration had been cancelled on 21 May 2021, but a show‑cause notice was served only through the Common Portal on 28 June 2025, more than four years …
The petitioners, Chimera Infrastructure Private Limited, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 03‑08‑2026 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST. The petitioners had earlier invoked the statutory remedy provided under Rule 86A(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, to …
M/S Nutech System Control filed a writ petition challenging an adjudication order dated 26 April 2024 issued by the State Tax Commissioner of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner argued that the hearing date was fixed on the same day as the personal hearing, which preceded the deadline for filing a reply …
M/S Nutech System Control challenged an adjudication order dated 09‑12‑2025 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017, on the ground that its GST registration had been cancelled on 15‑06‑2024 but the show‑cause notice was only issued electronically on 24‑09‑2025, leaving the petitioner …
The appellant Raj Kumar filed an intra‑court appeal 300 days after the impugned order, seeking condonation of delay and reversal of costs imposed on the affidavit deponent and 74 petitioners. The court found the cause shown for the delay sufficient and condoned the 300‑day delay. It examined the …
M/S Sohgaura Brothers filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 30‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The petitioners argued that the order was erroneous, but the respondents contended that the petitioners had a statutory right of appeal. …
B. Agrawal Stone Products Ltd filed a writ petition seeking interest on a refund paid under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, having made representations to the Assessing Officer on several dates in 2025‑2026. The Court observed that the substantive decision on the claim rests with …
The petitioners, M/s Margo Impex Private Limited and another, sought to file an appeal against an Order‑in‑Original passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and requested that the respondent (the Customs Commissionerate, Noida) decide a waiver application pending before it. The issue was whether a …
The petitioner, Imran Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking to appeal an adjudication order passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and to obtain a direction for the respondent to decide his waiver application pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Court noted that a similar matter, Runway Impex …
The petitioner, Moazzem Ali, filed a writ petition seeking to appeal an adjudication order passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and also requested that the revenue authority decide his waiver application pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Court noted that a similar matter, Runway Impex & …
M/S Tehri Pulp and Paper Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and four other respondents. The petition was listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed …
M/S Tehri Pulp & Paper Ltd filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 2409 of 2026) against the Union of India and four other respondents. The petition was argued before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with Pooja Talwar representing the petitioner and Sudhanshu Srivastava, A.S.G.I., and …
M/S Tehri Pulp and Paper Ltd filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 2420 of 2026) against the Union of India and four other respondents. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of the petition. The court directed that the orders be as per the earlier order dated in Writ Tax No. 2048 of 2026 …
The petitioner, M/S Candy Floss Educational Society, filed a writ petition seeking a refund of road tax paid on a vehicle (Regn. No. UP 78 HK 8250) after the Government of Uttar Pradesh issued an exemption order on June 28, 2024 for various categories of hybrid electric vehicles. The petition argued …
The petitioners, Avitek Computers and Nitin Kumar Varshney, filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 29 August 2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. They contended that the order was erroneous and sought its setting aside. …
The appellant, Priyanka Goyal, filed a writ petition seeking payment of her current salary, alleging a continuing cause of action despite a 16‑year lapse since her appointment. The single judge dismissed the petition at the fresh stage without ordering a counter affidavit, reasoning that the delay …
The petitioners, M/s Warsi Bag, challenged an ex parte adjudication order dated 17 February 2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. They contended that the order was erroneous and sought relief through a writ petition. The respondents, the State of Uttar …
The petitioner, M/S Prisca Global, challenged an adjudication order dated 13‑02‑2025 issued after its GST registration was cancelled on 09‑09‑2021. The State had served a show‑cause notice electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation that disabled the petitioner from accessing the …
The petitioner, M/S Prisca Global, challenged an adjudication order dated 17‑05‑2024 issued after its GST registration had been cancelled on 09‑09‑2021. The respondents served a show‑cause notice electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation that disabled the petitioner from …
M/S Prisca Global challenged an adjudication order dated 17‑05‑2024, arguing that the show‑cause notice issued electronically on 07‑03‑2024 was invalid because its GST registration had been cancelled on 09‑09‑2021. The Court noted that after cancellation, the petitioner could no longer access the …
M/S Prisca Global challenged an adjudication order dated 31.03.2021/01.12.2021 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (S.I.B) after its GST registration was cancelled on 09.09.2021. The show‑cause notice was served electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation disabling the petitioner …
The petitioner, M/s Hanuman Trading Company, challenged an adjudication order dated 04‑04‑2024 issued after a show‑cause notice was served electronically on 12‑12‑2023, despite its GST registration having been cancelled on 13‑01‑2021. The Court examined whether, under Section 169(1)(a)(b) of the …
The petitioner, M/s Al‑Safa Industries Pvt Ltd, challenged an order dated 04‑11‑2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, which was passed on the same day the show‑cause notice was issued and without granting a personal hearing. The court held that this contravened the basic …
The appellant, a Junior Engineer of the Distribution Corporation, was suspended on 19‑Feb‑2026 for alleged negligence without a prior inquiry. He challenged the suspension, arguing that the charges were minor, did not warrant a major penalty, and that his continued service would not prejudice the …
The petitioner, M/s Ashok Kumar Gooliyaan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground of drafting defects and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner, Shiv Brick Field, filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 25 February 2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax (U.P.G.S.T.) Act, 2017. The petition raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative …
Badshah Traders challenged an adjudication order dated 21‑02‑2025 issued after its GST registration was suspended on 09‑07‑2025. The show‑cause notice was served electronically via the Common Portal, despite the registration cancellation which, according to the respondents, should have required …
The petitioner, M/s Baijnath Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in passing a penalty order under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, after its goods were detained in June 2024 and released provisionally. The petition argued that the two‑year delay deprived it of the …
Birendra Singh Vaire challenged his appointment as Lecturer (English) at Maghanand Inter College, Bulandshahr, alleging irregularities related to reservation. After withdrawing an earlier writ (6890 of 2006), he filed a second writ (22502 of 2006) on the same ground and a separate writ (1339 of …
The petitioner, Mahagun (India) Private Limited, challenged the High Court order dated 28‑11‑2023 that rejected its claim for a GST refund. The revenue argued that the petitioner must first pursue the statutory remedy of filing an appeal, while the petitioner contended that the order was not …
M/s Shree Dalveer Contractor and Supplier challenged the cancellation of its registration under the U.P. GST Act, 2017 by an order dated 08.08.2024, which was based on a system‑generated notice dated 08.07.2024. The petition argued that the notice, lacking the name, office and digital signature of …
The petitioner, Vaishali Export House, sought a refund of road tax paid on a vehicle (Regn. No. UP 21 CZ 8009) after the Government decided on June 28, 2024 to exempt certain hybrid electric vehicles from road tax. The learned Standing Counsel highlighted this exemption, establishing that the tax …
The petitioner, M/S New Calcutta Machinery Stores, had its GST registration cancelled on 16‑12‑2023. Subsequent show‑cause notices dated 25‑12‑2023 and 31‑05‑2024 were issued electronically via the Common Portal, despite the cancellation. The court held that under Section 169(1)(a)(b) of the Uttar …
The Allahabad High Court considered an intra‑court appeal filed 58 days after the original judgment, which dismissed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment on the ground of delay. The court condoned the 58‑day filing delay but held that the substantive appeal lacked merit. It observed …
The petitioner, M/s Rj Namkinos, challenged an adjudication order dated 30‑04‑2026 and filed an appeal which was dismissed as time‑barred on 09‑09‑2025. Although the court granted time to amend the appeal, the petitioner failed to file any amendment and did not seek any relief against the appellate …
The appellant, Krishna Kumar Mishra, sought regularisation in service under the Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad‑hoc Appointments (Third Amendment) Rules, 2001, claiming he was appointed ad‑hoc before 30‑June‑1998 and continued in service beyond 20‑Dec‑2001. The single judge had dismissed his writ …
The appellants, Kamal Kumar Singh and others, challenged a single judge's order that interpreted the Commission Act to the detriment of their rights as officiating principals of intermediate colleges. They sought to continue in their positions until regular appointments were made and to receive the …
The petitioner Veer Singh surrendered his vehicle (Reg. No. U.P. 17 T 1076) on 27‑02‑2018 after it became unfit for use, selling it to a scrap dealer. The tax authorities nonetheless demanded road tax and a penalty for the period from 2018 onward, amounting to Rs.11,34,381. The petitioner challenged …
M/S A.A. Brick Works filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 28‑08‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioners argued that the order was erroneous and sought its setting aside. The respondents contended that the …
The appellant, Imami Mansoori, filed a special appeal 149 days after the order of the single judge dated 31 October 2025, seeking to challenge the promotion of a private respondent (no.6) to Lecturer in Physics. The court first condoned the delay in filing the appeal as no objection was raised. The …
M/S Maxono Security Services Private Limited filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an adjudication order dated 09.03.2026 issued under Section 74 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. The State of U.P. and other respondents contended that the petitioner was required to use the statutory …
The petitioners, M/s Shipster Impex and another, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement to make a pre‑deposit of 7.5% of the disputed customs duty/penalty before filing an appeal against an Order‑in‑Original dated 28‑Nov‑2025. They sought a direction that the appeal be allowed to be …
M/S Purnima Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 23‑02‑2025 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal. The petitioners …
Baba Iron Scrap Company challenged an adjudication order dated 31‑10‑2025 passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for the tax period June 2021 to March 2022. The revenue argued that the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy of appeal, while the petitioner claimed that severe personal …
The High Court examined a writ petition filed by Elentech India Private Limited challenging the Uttar Pradesh revenue department’s computation of interest on VAT demands for assessment years 2012‑13 to 2015‑16, issued under section 28 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. The petitioner asserted that it had …
Vinod Kumar Mishra, the complainant in a disciplinary proceeding against Dinesh Chandra Pathak, filed an application for leave to appeal a single judge's order that the suspension order remain in abeyance pending the enquiry. The High Court examined whether a complainant, who is not a co‑employee of …
M/S Pit Zone, represented by Anubhav Jain, challenged an adjudication order dated 03.03.2026 issued by the Superintendent, Central GST, for the tax periods 2019‑2020 to 2021‑2022. The petition raised two grounds: that the composite notice covering three financial years was jurisdictionally invalid, …
M/S Hindustan Paper Machinery Industries filed a writ petition challenging the revenue's order dated 22‑12‑2025, alleging denial of a hearing, lack of reasons for adverse findings, and non‑disclosure of Records Used During Investigation (RUDs). The Court noted that similar grounds had been raised in …
The petitioners, Harey Krishna Cables Pvt Ltd and another, challenged an order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued by the revenue authority, alleging denial of a hearing, lack of reasons for adverse material, and non‑availability of Relevant Unobligated Documents (RUDs) before the adjudicating proceedings …
The petitioner Phool Chandra challenged an order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued by the revenue, alleging denial of a hearing, lack of reasons, and non‑provision of records used for determination (RUDs). The Court referred to its earlier order in M/S Shankar Trading Company v. Union of India, which set …
The petitioner, Umed Singh, challenged the tax adjudicating authority's order dated 22 December 2025 on grounds of denial of a hearing, lack of reasons for decisions, and non‑disclosure of RUDs before the conclusion of proceedings. The Court noted that similar factual circumstances existed in the …
The petitioner, M/s. Divya Laxmi Trading & Co., challenged the revenue's order dated 22‑12‑2025 on grounds that it denied them a hearing, failed to provide Reasoned Unexplained Documents (RUDs) before adjudication, and relied on questionable material. The High Court noted that similar issues had …
The appellant, Upendra Nath Rai, filed a special appeal against the District Inspector of Schools and two others. No party appeared to press the appeal, and only the State's standing counsel was present. The High Court held that the appeal could not proceed without prosecution and dismissed it. …
The petitioner, Asish Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but no party appeared to press the matter. The learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents was present. The Court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition and …
M/s Shankar Trading Company challenged a penalty order dated 22‑12‑2025, which confirmed demands under a show‑cause notice issued on 31‑05‑2024 pursuant to Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that the notice and subsequent order were ex‑parte, that he …
M/s Jindal Metal Co. and another challenged an adjudication order dated 22‑12‑2025 issued under Sections 74 and 122 of the CGST Act, 2017, alleging that the authority failed to consider the petitioners' explanation and imposed a penalty without proper reasoning. The petitioners argued that the order …
The petitioners, Ansar Ahmad, challenged an order dated 22 September 2025 passed under Section 72 of the Uttar Pradesh (United Provinces) Excise Act, 1910. They sought relief by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The respondents argued that the petitioners had an …
The petitioner, Ram Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State to allow payment of road tax on his vehicle in installments, without recovery charges or compound interest, citing that the vehicle was damaged in an accident and he was facing financial …
The Mathura Vrindavan Taxi and Driver Welfare Association filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to allow individual members to file separate petitions if they have causes of action. The standing counsel for the …
The petitioner, Siddharth Shankar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The petition was examined and found to be defective because it did not specify the relief sought nor clearly identify a cause of action. The Court …
The petitioner, M/s Balaji Interiors, challenged an adjudication order dated 21‑08‑2024 issued after a show‑cause notice was uploaded electronically on the GST Common Portal, despite its registration having been cancelled on 13‑10‑2021. The Court examined whether service of the notice by electronic …
The petitioners, M/s Rainbow Impex and another, sought to file an appeal against an Order-in-Original passed under the Customs Act, 1962, and requested that the respondent customs authority decide a waiver application pending before it. The High Court noted that a prior decision in M/s Runway Impex …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Gooliyaan, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 20 March 2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner under Section 28(2)(ii) of the Uttar Pradesh VAT Act, alleging tax liability. The court noted that for assessment year 2015-16, an earlier ex …
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged the appointment of Ram Kewal and eight others as Assistant Teachers, alleging that the post created in 1986 was not genuine and that the 1996 advertisement and selection were unlawful. Multiple writ petitions were filed over three decades, with earlier courts …
The appellant, Parmeshwari Dayal, filed an intra-court appeal before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the appellant submitted a withdrawal application seeking to withdraw the appeal. The respondents' counsel, Gaurav Gautam, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court examined …
The appellant, Sushila Kumari, a contractual employee engaged by the private firm Avani Paridhi Energy and Communications Ltd., challenged her disengagement before the High Court of Allahabad. The single judge observed that the dispute was purely between private parties and that a contractual …
The petitioner, D.N. Polytechnic, filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No.3852 of 2025) challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The court observed that another writ petition (Writ Tax No.1046 of 2025) concerning the same grievance was already pending. Since the present petition was …
The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission appealed against Surabhi Ramesh Pandey and two others, contending that the original petitioners had failed to clear the examination and that the appeal had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The learned counsel for the Commission argued that …
The Allahabad High Court heard an appeal by Smt. Arti Sonkar and another against the State of U.P. and others concerning succession and payment of terminal dues of the deceased employee Kripa Shankar. The court noted that the original petitioner‑respondent is alleged to be the second wife of the …
Jb Industries filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition, citing inherent defects in the pleadings and requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. Notice was served on the revenue counsel, and no objection was raised. The Court …
Vivabo Product Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Upasna Agrawal, sought permission to withdraw the petition on the ground of inherent defects in the pleadings and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The court issued notice …
