Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
213 judgments · newest first · showing 201–213
Dr. Neeraj Kishore Mishra filed an intra‑court appeal seeking to set aside a single judge’s order dismissing his petition for a first or second service increment. The appeal was filed 23 days late, but the delay was condoned. The court examined whether the appellant had any legal entitlement to the …
The Commissioner of Central GST appealed against the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's order that deleted a personal penalty imposed on M/s Maharashtra Freight Carriers under Rule 29 of the Central Excise Rules, 2017. The appeal raised the question of whether the Tribunal erred in …
The Commissioner of Central GST appealed to the Allahabad High Court against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 06.08.2025, which had set aside a personal penalty imposed on Sanjiv Kumar under Rule 29 of the Central Excise Rules, 2017. The appeal raised the …
M/S Jadaun Brothers filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 16‑08‑2024 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The respondents contended that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the adjudication order. The …
M/S Rupa Traders filed a writ petition challenging two ex‑parte adjudication orders dated 22‑04‑2024 and 03‑02‑2023 that were passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The respondents argued that the petitioner had a statutory right to appeal the adjudication …
Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 23616 of 2010) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner failed to appear at a hearing, and the court ordered him to engage new counsel. An office report dated 13.01.2026 revealed that the …
Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner did not appear, and the court directed him to engage new counsel. An office report later revealed that the petitioner had died, and no application for substitution was filed. Since the sole petitioner was deceased …
Moti Lal Goel filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner died before the hearing and no application for substitution of legal representative was filed. The court noted that notices had been dispatched but the original petitioner was deceased. In the absence of a substitute …
Dr. Dhananjay Singh appealed against the State of U.P. and five others in a civil miscellaneous matter. The appellant filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 19 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal. The respondents, represented by Brajesh Kumar Chaturvedi and …
The appellant, Ravindra Kumar Awasthi, filed a special appeal challenging a decision of the lower court. The High Court noted that an earlier case with identical facts, Ravindra Kumar Awasthi vs. State of U.P. and 5 others (2026), had been allowed. Relying on that precedent, the Court found no …
The appellants Santosh Kumar Shukla and others filed Special Appeal Defective No. 272 of 2013 against the Union of India and others. Counsel for the appellants, Alok Mishra, submitted that the appeal had become infructuous. The respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., Ritvik Upadhya, Rizwan Ali …
The appellant Jabiullah filed a writ petition seeking liberty to withdraw the petition. The single judge dismissed the petition on the basis that the request to withdraw was not permitted. The appellant then filed an intra‑court appeal challenging that dismissal. The High Court examined whether an …
Petitioner M/s Intragenix Remedies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later decided not to pursue the matter and filed a Civil Miscellaneous Withdrawal Application. The petitioner's counsel, Tanmay Sadh, indicated the desire to withdraw, and the revenue counsel, Parv Agarwal, …
