Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY

431 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHERversusVINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation challenged a Labour Court award that declared the dismissal of conductor Vinod Kumar illegal and ordered his reinstatement with back wages. The Court examined whether the departmental inquiry into alleged ticket‑less passengers was conducted fairly …

MAHENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licensee, had his license cancelled by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate on the ground of alleged irregularities in the distribution of essential commodities, based largely on statements of card‑holders. The petitioner appealed, arguing that the inquiry was unfair, that …

SMT. MAMTA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licensee, had her licence cancelled after a series of inspections that alleged irregularities in the distribution of food grains, including shortfalls in stock and complaints by ration card‑holders. The first inspection led to a suspension order, which the …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in a statutory inquiry initiated against him under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act. The complaint led to a preliminary inquiry, after which a proper inquiry was ordered, but the inquiry remains incomplete. The …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Rakesh Kumar filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. Both parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in line with the coordination bench order in Bajhang v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026, dated 22‑07‑2026). The court noted …

UMA SHANKAR RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Uma Shankar Rawat filed a writ petition seeking the transfer of a Fair Price Shop licence that had been issued to his uncle. The petitioner argued that the High Court should direct the concerned authority to effect the transfer. Counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be …

RITU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ritu Devi, filed a writ petition seeking the inclusion of her name in the family register maintained under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj system. The High Court observed that the appropriate remedy is to file an application under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of …

AVANISH KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Avanish Kumar Rai filed a writ petition under the Right to Information Act, 2005, seeking information that had already been provided in an order dated 27 July 2026 in his second appeal. The petitioner alleged that a respondent had been appointed on forged documents, but an inquiry found the …

SHAKSHAR SINGH PUNDHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Shakshar Singh Pundhir filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed against him. The petitioner sought relief to file an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition could be disposed of by …

YASH PUNDHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Yash Pundhir filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed against him under the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner sought liberty to file an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, submitted that …

MARKANDEY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Markandey Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his application dated 4 July 2024 for the transfer of an arms licence originally issued to his deceased father. The application remained pending without a decision. The High Court noted the …

GULFAN @ GULPHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gulfan Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery actions of a cooperative bank. Both parties agreed that the petition should be decided in accordance with the earlier order in Bajanth v. State of U.P. (RIT‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The court considered the …

HARI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hari Singh and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petitioners possessed an efficacious alternative remedy in the form of an appeal under the applicable law. …

PREETIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Preeti filed a writ petition challenging the selection of a licensee for a fair price shop, alleging various irregularities. The High Court heard arguments from both parties. The Court noted that the petitioner must demonstrate a lis to the proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was …

U.P.STATE HANDLOOM CORPORATION LTD.versusDINESH MISHRA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, U.P. State Handloom Corporation Ltd., challenged an award of the Labour Court that declared the retrenchment of respondent Dinesh Mishra illegal and ordered his reinstatement with full back wages. The High Court examined whether the retrenchment complied with Section 6(P) of the U.P. …

U.P.S.R.T.C. THRU. M.D. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former UPSRTC employee, was initially appointed Chowkidar in 1977, promoted to Office Assistant (Second) in 1978, then reverted to Chowkidar. Industrial disputes in 1984 and subsequent awards (1985, 2004) directed his reinstatement as Office Assistant and later promotion to Head …

VIPIN GARGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Vipin Garg filed a civil review application (No. 177 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a reasoned judgment. The applicant, though filing in person, was not present before the court. The bench observed that the judgment under review was reasoned and, relying on the precedent set in …

MUKESH VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Mukesh Vishwakarma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his pending application for a grant of arms licence (File No.193 of 2024). The petition argued that the application had not been adjudicated despite the passage of time. The Court examined …

UPENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to expedite a proceeding under the Uttar Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972, in which the State was a party and the petitioner was only a complainant. The High Court …

VIJAY PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vijay Pal Singh, reported that his firearm had been stolen and sought to obtain a new licensed firearm. He requested the court to allow him to file an application under Rule 18 of the Arms Rules, 2016, or any other relevant provision, provided there was no legal impediment. The …

GIRJA SHANKAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Girja Shankar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking relief while an appeal under the Control Order, 2016 was pending before the court. The petition included a second prayer for the court to direct the respondents to expedite the pending appeal and to set a timeline for any stay …

SHIVDASI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shivdasi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking relief, presumably related to a claim for pendente lite interest against the State of U.P. and an insurance company. The petitioner’s counsel argued that she should be allowed to file an application before a Permanent Lok Adalat to claim …

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusABDUL RAZZAK AND 5 OTHERS

The petition was filed by HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. challenging an award of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in a dispute with Abdul Razzak and five others. The petitioner contended that the PLA had not complied with the mandatory conciliation process prescribed under Section 22‑C of the Legal …

SUMIT PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner applied for a firearm licence on 28 February 2026 and sought the court's intervention to expedite the processing of his application. He filed a writ petition requesting the competent authority to consider his licence application promptly. The court, without delving into the merits of …

SHER BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sher Bahadur Singh filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning the transfer of a Fair Price Shop licence that had been issued to his uncle. He requested that the court allow him to continue pursuing the matter before the appropriate administrative authority. Counsel for the petitioner …

TEJ BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Tej Bahadur filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State to consider an application for transfer of his arms licence from one state to another under Rule 17 of the Arms Rules, 2016. The petitioner indicated he would file the application within three weeks. The State’s standing …

BIJENDRA KUMAR @ VIJENDRA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an advocate, challenged the cancellation of his firearm licence, arguing that he had been acquitted in nine criminal cases and only one case remained pending. The pending case (Crime No. 155/2023) involves serious offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 354Kha, 452, 308 and 34 of the …

BHAGAT SHAKTI SAMRAT SINGH SONDHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Bhagat Shakti Samrat Singh Sondh, filed a writ petition seeking expedited consideration of his application for a firearm licence filed on 15 April 2025. The petitioner alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The court, without delving into the merits of …

BRAJ MOHAN @ SWAMI CHAITANYA DEV ARYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Braj Mohan, filed a writ petition challenging an order that he believed could be appealed under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the appropriate remedy was to file an appeal rather than continue the writ petition. The court considered whether the …

ANOOP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Anoop Singh filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents, including a cooperative bank. Both parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in line with the earlier order in Bajanth v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated …

SMT. SARVESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petition filed by Smt. Sarvesh was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed reference to the order passed in Writ‑C No. 39422 of 2026 (Smt. Shila Devi vs. State of U.P. and others) for details. No substantive discussion of facts, issues, or reasoning was provided in the short …

SMT. SHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, former Gram Pradhans now serving as Administrators under Government Orders, were subjected to proceedings under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 for alleged financial irregularities committed during their tenure as Pradhan. A notice demanding a reply was issued …

SMT. SUMBUL JAHAN @ SUMBULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petition filed by Smt. Sumbul Jahan under writ jurisdiction sought relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the petition without a detailed order. …

SAHUMATA SWAYAM SAHAYATA SAMUH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are subsequent allottees, filed a writ petition challenging an order of appeal that restored a fair‑price‑shop licence to the contesting respondents. The appeal had been allowed after the petitioners were heard as subsequent allottees. The petitioners contended that the order …

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,versusMADHU GUPTA AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court examined a writ petition filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. challenging an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 29‑05‑2026. The petitioner argued that the PLA had not complied with the mandatory conciliation procedure prescribed under Section 22 of the …

ASHWANI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ashwani Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking transfer of an arms licence originally issued to his father. The trial court had rejected the transfer on the ground that the petitioner was facing a criminal trial. The petitioner contended that a final report had been filed and accepted, …

ARSHAD MALIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

An inquiry was launched under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up‑Pradhan and Members) Inquiry Rules, 1997 against petitioner Arshad Malik for alleged irregularities during his tenure. The preliminary inquiry found him prima facie guilty and recommended a financial penalty, but …

SEWARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Sewaram filed a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings of a loan. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed in line with the coordination bench order in Baijanth v. State of U.P. (RIT‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The court considered the limit of recovery under the …

PHULWA AND OTHERSversusA.D.J. ANPARA SONBHADRA AND OTHERS

The petitioners Phulwa and others filed Writ Petition C No. 28738 of 2002 in the Allahabad High Court against A.D.J. Anpara Sonbhadra and others. Counsel for the petitioners were listed as Rahul Sripat, A.K. Narayan, Chandreshwar Prasad, Dhuru Narayan, Ishir Sripat, J.H. Khan, J.K. Yadav, M.L. …

STATE OF UP AND ANOTHERversusRAM KISHORE AND ANOTHER

The Department of Minor Irrigation, State of U.P., challenged a Labour Court award that reinstated a workman and ordered back wages without giving the employer an opportunity to prove the charges against him. The petitioner argued that this violated the principles of natural justice, citing Supreme …

MOHD. FAROOKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd. Farookh's arms licence was cancelled on the ground of his involvement in a criminal case, although he was later acquitted. He appealed the cancellation, but the appeal was dismissed. The petitioner sought permission to file a fresh application for a licence, arguing that the earlier …

M/S AMPH FASHION PVT. LTD.versusAUTHORITY UNDER UP INDUSTRIAL PEACE AND 2 OTHERS

The Trade Union filed an application alleging that contract workers employed by B.S. Enterprises for Amph Fashion Pvt. Ltd were not paid wages, bonuses or statutory benefits. The Additional Labour Court, after the contractor failed to appear, ordered Amph Fashion to pay the workers under Section 21 …

AMIT TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Amit Tyagi, a senior sub‑editor at Amar Ujala, sought a reference of his wage‑board dispute to a Labour Court under Section 17 of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1955. The Labour Court dismissed the reference, holding it lacked jurisdiction because …

JAIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaipal Singh challenged a surcharge determination order issued under Section 27 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, arguing that the alleged irregularities dated 2005-2008 fell outside the ten‑year limitation period prescribed in Section 28 of the same Act, as the notice was first issued …

SANDEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sandeep Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the allotment of a fair price shop at Village Sikari, Tehsil Rajapur, District Chitrakoot. The Gram Panchayat had approved the proposal in an open meeting and forwarded the documents to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate on 17‑12‑2025, but the State …

RAMESH SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ramesh Shukla filed a writ petition seeking the speedy disposal of his appeal (Appeal No. 111/B) filed under Section 13(1) of the U.P. Essential Commodities (Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016 before the Commissioner, Azamgarh Division. The petitioner argued that the appeal had …

PROP HARI SHANKAR AWASTHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Hari Shankar Awasthi filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner acknowledged that the pleadings were not proper and requested liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Hon'ble Judge …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU HOME SECY. AND OTHERS

Ashok Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner later filed a withdrawal application (No. 4/2026) seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The Court heard counsel for the petitioner and allowed the withdrawal …

NAGAR NIGAM KARMCHARI SANGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, elected as President of the Nagar Nigam Karmchari Sangh, Ghaziabad, sought registration of their election with the Deputy Labour Commissioner, but the registration was denied by an order dated 23‑Jan‑2026 on the ground that the election did not comply with the union's bye‑laws. The …

PHERU PRASADversusPRESCRIBED OFFICER LABOUR COURT AND 2 ORS.

Pheru Prasad filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed under Section 33-C(2) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking interest on a delayed payment of Rs.31,132. The petitioner claimed that the amount was due on 30 September 2000 but was actually paid on …

M/S POPULAR IRON AND SEEEL COMPANY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioners, M/S Popular Iron and Steel Company and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents. During the proceedings, the parties reached a compromise, which was placed on record. The …

SHIVNATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought restoration of a fair‑price shop licence originally held by his deceased father, which had been cancelled and later reinstated by the High Court. While the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate initiated proceedings to allot the shop to the petitioner on inheritance grounds, the shop had …

RINKU KUMAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ C No. 22952 of 2026) was filed by Rinku Kumar Gautam against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petition was not prosecuted. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay costs …

RITIK CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ritik Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking expedited consideration of his application for a firearm licence dated 06-02-2026. The petitioner alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The Court, without delving into the merits of the licence application, …

SMT. MADHUBALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licence holder, challenged the cancellation of her licence after three surprise inspections revealed stock mismatches (60 kg wheat shortfall and 47 kg rice excess) and complaints from numerous card‑holders about irregular distribution. The petitioner submitted …

SMT. HEMLATA GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Hemlata Gupta, was receiving family pension from two Employees Provident Fund (EPF) organisations, leading to the seizure of one pension account. She sought permission to file an application before the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Regional Office, Meerut, to …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking expedited consideration of his application for a firearm licence filed on 5 December 2025. The petitioner alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The High Court, without delving into the merits of the licence …

RANJEET KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ranjeet Kumar and two others filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. Both parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in line with the coordination bench order in Bajanth v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The …

SULEMAN HUSAINversusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA

Petitioner Suleman Husain filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of his pending Appeal No. 81 of 2025, filed on 28 August 2025, before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been unduly delayed and requested the Court to direct the …

RAM MURATversusREGIONAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ram Murat filed a writ petition alleging that his savings account with Bank of Baroda was frozen on the premise that a loan taken by his father remained unpaid, which he contends has already been settled. The bank argued that it would examine any application made by the petitioner and, if …

SMT KAMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Kamla Devi filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to expedite the pending Employees' Compensation case (E.C. 201 of 2015) before the Employees Compensation Commissioner/Deputy Labour Commissioner, Prayagraj. The petition argued that the case had been unduly delayed. The Court, …

POORAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of a writ petition filed by Pooran Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and a bank. Both parties agreed that the petition should be decided in accordance with the Coordinating Bench order in Bajanth v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. …

HARI OMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Hari Om filed a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings of a bank. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed in line with the coordination bench's order in Bajanth v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026, 22‑07‑2026). The court also referred to the Anjani Kumar v. …

KGR GREENS INFRATECH PVT LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kgr Greens Infratech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, asking that the pending appeal …

NISHA BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Nisha Bharti sought enforcement of a resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat granting her an allotment of a fair price shop, alleging that the authorities had not expedited the subsequent proceedings. The petitioner filed a writ petition contending that there was no legal barrier to …

DEENDAYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deendayal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 22 April 2026 issued by the Prabhari Adhikari (Shastra), which was a consequential order following the cancellation of his arms licence by the District Magistrate of Pilibhit. The cancellation order itself was not annexed to …

M/S HC INFRACITY PVT LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel Tanmay Sadh, sought the disposal of their writ petition on the ground that both parties were before the revisional authority in Lucknow and had undertaken to submit written arguments. The State, through counsel Shyam Singh, agreed that the revisional authority …

BHUPATI DAS (SINCE DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the State of Uttar Pradesh’s appeal under Section 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, which was filed after a five‑year lapse and without the required affidavit. After a 12‑year delay, the State finally filed an affidavit seeking condonation of …

ASHOK KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the licensing authority to decide his application dated 10 September 2021 concerning a fair price shop. The High Court, in an earlier order (Writ C No. 125/2022), directed the Assistant Collector to decide the …

SMT. NEERAJ TIWARIversusState of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Neeraj Tiwari filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to expedite the transfer of a firearm licence that had been issued to her deceased husband. The petition, filed in 2021, remained pending and the only relief sought was the issuance of the writ. The High Court …

GANESH SINGHversusPRESIDING OFFICER AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a former bank employee, was terminated on 27 November 2001 on the ground that he was involved in three criminal cases. The Labour Court upheld the termination, noting the seriousness of the pending cases. While the writ petition was pending, the petitioner was acquitted in all three …

DIGVIJAY NARAYAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Digvijay Narayan Singh and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought appropriate relief against the respondents. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice …

I.C.I.C.I. LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDHEERAJ JAIN

The petition filed by I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. challenged an order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had decided a dispute with Dheeraj Jain without complying with the conciliation requirements of Section 22‑C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued …

ASALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his fair price shop licence by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and the subsequent rejection of his appeal by the Additional Commissioner. The licence was cancelled on the basis of statements from 40 card‑holders alleging irregularities, but the petitioner …

SMT. MEERA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 10(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, seeking an expeditious decision in the pending criminal case State vs. Mammu alias Ramdevi (Case No. 513 of 1976-77). The petition argued that undue delay in adjudicating the …

MANJU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Manju Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having noted the parties' …

DEEPAK JAIN NIRALA @ POET DEEPAK NIRALAversusSTATE OF U.P AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Jain Nirala, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 36373 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Chitranshu Srivastav, sought liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition with better …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, an outgoing Pradhan, faced two separate inquiries—one for alleged embezzlement and another under Section 95(1)(g) of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. Notices for recovery under Section 27(1) and for inquiry under Section 95(1)(g) were issued, and the petitioner’s reply was …

MANOHAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manohar Singh filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and a bank. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in accordance with the coordination bench order in Bajanth v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The court …

BRAMHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bramha Singh, challenged the cancellation of his arms licence on the ground that he has two pending criminal cases and claims false implication. The court noted that the petitioner has a history of multiple criminal cases, with five acquittals and two cases still pending, including …

SURENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious decision on his representation dated 10 May 2026 concerning the allotment of a fair price shop under the dying‑in‑harness rules. The High Court noted the petitioner's request and, after hearing counsel, directed the respondent authorities …

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking that an inquiry initiated against the Village Pradhan, based on complaints, be concluded expeditiously. The court noted that a preliminary inquiry had been conducted and a show‑cause notice to the Village Pradhan and …

RAM DEV MATHURversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Dev Mathur, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, alleging unpaid salary from a private insurer, PNB Metlife India Insurance Company. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the standing counsel for the …

PREM NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner’s arms licence was cancelled and his appeal against the cancellation was dismissed on the ground that he was implicated in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The petitioner argued that it had not been established whether the licensed firearm was actually used, that the …

GANGA MADDHESHIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ganga Maddheshiya filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 37660 of 2026) and a stay application dated 24‑July‑2026, along with Appeal No. 1620/2026, seeking the Court’s intervention within a stipulated period. The petition sought a decision on the stay application concerning the appeal against …

SMT RINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Rinki Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 37661 of 2026) challenging an order of the District Magistrate, Kushi Nagar, and also moved a stay application dated 23 July 2026. The petitioner sought a prompt decision on the stay application and the appeal (No. 1619/2026) within the …

RIFAKAT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rifakat and two others, filed a writ petition seeking relief for inclusion of their names in the electoral roll. The petitioners' counsel requested that the petition be disposed of while granting them liberty to file independent applications under Rule 9 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj …

SHYAM BABBOO SHIVHAREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Babboo Shivhare, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. Counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be disposed of with liberty to file a revision under Section 41(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban …

SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Santosh Kumar Mishra filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act. The lower authority had dismissed the appeal on the ground that the petitioner failed to file any written submissions, thereby not considering the status of five criminal cases …

DIGVIJAY NARAYAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the order of the Additional Commissioner that declared 67.29 acres of their ancestral land surplus under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. They argued that the Commissioner exceeded the notice amount, ignored earlier remand orders, and …

SAMAYA SINGHversusPRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The petitioners filed Writ No. 950 of 1991 before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the Court. The Court observed that the petition has been pending since 1991 and the petitioners or their counsel have not shown diligence in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the Court dismissed …

AFROZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Afroz challenged the cancellation of his Fair Price Shop licence, contending that he had filed a five‑page explanation to the charges on 17 April 2018, which was duly certified but not placed on the licensing authority's file. The Appellate Authority dismissed his appeal on the basis …

STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERSversusPRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AND ANOTHER

The State of U.P. Irrigation Department challenged a Labour Court award dated 29‑07‑2020 that reinstated a former chowkidar and ordered full back wages, asserting that his services were terminated on 1 January 1993. The award was based on a finding that the respondent had worked more than 240 days …

UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusSRI RAM BAHADUR AND ANOTHER

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) challenged a Labour Court award that declared the termination of driver Sri Ram Bahadur on 29‑09‑2012 illegal and ordered his reinstatement with full back wages. UPSRTC argued that the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re‑examining …

U.P.S.R.T.C. MEERUTversusTOTA RAM AND OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court entertained two writ petitions challenging the validity of awards issued by a tribunal at Dehradun before the creation of Uttarakhand. The petitioners argued that Sections 90 and 91 of the U.P. Re‑organization Act, 2000 required any proceeding pending on the appointed date …

U.P.S.R.T.C. MEERUTversusK.P. SINGH DRIVER AND ANOTHER

Petitioner U.P.S.R.T.C. Meerut filed writ petition No. 32996 of 2002 before the Allahabad High Court against respondents K.P. Singh Driver and another. The petition was listed before Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The court observed that an order had already been passed in writ C No. 22861 …

RAM BACHAN AND ANOTHERversusCOMMISSIONER,AZAMGARGH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, two fair price shop licensees, challenged the suspension and subsequent cancellation of their licenses by the District Supply Officer, Mau, on grounds that they had not pasted the BPL list and had not obtained a distribution certificate from the Gram Pradhan. They argued that a …

ARJUNversusBHAGIRATH

The appellant Arjun challenged a decree of injunction granted by the first appellate court in a land dispute where the plaintiff's title was alleged to be clouded by an oral family settlement. The appellant argued that the first appellate court erred by not requiring proof of the oral settlement, by …

ASHU AND 75 OTHERSversusGAON SABHA AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a review application filed by Ashu and 75 others challenging a prior judgment that had set aside the allotment of land classified as pasture (gochar) and held the process illegal. The applicants argued that the land allotted to them was Usar (barren) land, not pasture, and …

SATISH CHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Satish Chandra Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the revocation of his arms licence by the Licensing Authority. The licence was revoked because the petitioner failed to appear before the Licensing Authority and did not submit required documents to the Appellate Authority, which affirmed the …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Alok Kumar filed a writ petition seeking speedy consideration of his application dated 23 January 2024 for a firearm licence. He alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The High Court, without delving into the merits of the licence application, directed the authority to …

MOHD. DANISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licensee, was inspected on 11 January 2024 and a discrepancy was found between the physical stock of wheat, rice and bajra and the entries in the stock register. The licensing authority suspended the licence, sought an explanation, and after the petitioner’s reply …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPERMANENT LOK ADALAT AND 2 OTHERS

The petition challenged an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in Ghaziabad that resolved an insurance dispute without conducting the statutory conciliation process under Section 22(g) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued that the PLA merely made a generic reference …

DALVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dalveer Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a court order to initiate an inquiry against the Pradhan of a Gram Panchayat at the end of his tenure, alleging extraneous circumstances. The High Court examined whether it could entertain such a petition and direct an inquiry. The Court …

GEETA DEVI GRAM PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, a Gram Pradhan, filed a writ petition seeking permission to file a fresh petition with better particulars under Section 72(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code. The petitioner argued that the original petition lacked sufficient details and that the court should allow a …

ASHOK KUMAR PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Ashok Kumar Pathak filed a writ petition seeking speedy consideration of his application dated 07-08-2024 for a firearm licence. He alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, did not opine on the merits of …

RAKESH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rakesh Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking an expedited consideration of his representation dated 25 June 2026. He alleged that the competent authority had not acted on his representation in a timely manner. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, ordered that the …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Oriental Insurance Company challenged the order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had adjudicated a dispute with the State of Uttar Pradesh and others without conducting a proper conciliation process as mandated by Section 22‑C/22(g) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner …

RAM PRAKASH AND 21 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 22 individuals, filed a writ petition alleging that their names were omitted from the voter list of Village Panchayat Nagla Taiyyadpur in Budaun district. They sought the court’s intervention to have their names entered. The respondents, representing the State of Uttar …

M/S NAVIN UPBHOGTA SAHKARI SAMITIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/S Navin Upbhogta Sahkari Samiti, filed a writ petition seeking to restrain the State from issuing a fresh advertisement for the appointment of a fair price shop, arguing that an appeal filed by an earlier allottee was still pending. The petitioner could not cite any legal authority …

AMBRISH KUMAR VIJAITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ambrish Kumar Vijaita, filed a writ petition seeking an order that his pending appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959, before the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division be decided expeditiously. The petition also requested that any other pending cases of a similar nature be …

ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Arif filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959, pending before the Commissioner, Meerut Division, be decided expeditiously. The petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court, after hearing counsel for …

ATHAR RAZAversusPERMANENT LOK ADALAT AND 2 OTHERS

Athar Raza filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat. The petitioner was represented by counsel Nigamendra Shukla. The High Court examined the petition and found no merit to interfere with the impugned order. The Court, however, directed that the parties may …

ANIL KUMAR PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Prajapati, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking an order that his second appeal dated 15-12-2025, pending before the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Uttar Pradesh, be decided expeditiously. The petition also requested that any other …

RAVINDRA SINGH TOMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners challenged a Tehsildar's order dated 25.08.2026 directing possession of land, contending that the area specified exceeded the surplus land (20.95 acres) determined in ceiling proceedings. They argued that the possession should be limited to the surplus area. The respondents indicated …

SURMUKH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Surmukh Singh filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and a bank seeking relief regarding the recovery of a loan. The parties agreed to dispose of the petition in line with a prior order in Baijanth v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No. 10013 of 2026). The Court considered the cap on …

NAFEES AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Nafees Ahmad filed a writ petition seeking correction of the date in his Pension Payment Order. The High Court examined the petition and noted that the grievance should be addressed based on the employer's records. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a detailed representation with …

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT TOWN INTER COLLEGEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Committee of Management of Town Inter College filed a writ petition (Writ No. 21179 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petitioners later filed a withdrawal application (No. 4/2026) seeking to retract the …

MOHAMMAD MANWARUL HUQ AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, beneficiaries of an order dated 2 April 2026 issued by the Prescribed Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, sought enforcement of a recovery certificate that the Authority had directed the District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to issue on 30 June 2026. Despite the …

NARENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, a complainant under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious completion of an inquiry that had been ordered but remained pending. The petition cited a letter dated 31‑12‑2025 from the Chief Development Officer, …

VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Virendra Pratap Singh filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider his application dated 14 November 2025 for an arms license under the sports quota. The petitioner argued that his application was in proper format with requisite documents. The …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Amit Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of U.P. to consider his application dated 04‑11‑2022 for an arms licence under the sports quota. The petitioner argued that the application was in proper format with all requisite documents. The respondent's standing …

RAHUL RAGHUVANSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Rahul Raghuvanshi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider his application dated 09.01.2025 for an arms license for sports purposes. The petitioner argued that the application was filed in the proper format with requisite documents. The standing …

PRAVIN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Pravin Singh filed an appeal under Section 56 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, together with a stay application, alleging that the stay application had not been decided. The petitioner sought expeditious consideration of the stay. The High Court noted the delay and, without deciding the …

RAMLALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramlal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking direction for the expeditious disposal of a second appeal filed under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The petition alleged that the second appeal remained pending without a decision. The …

RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Singh, approached the Permanent Lok Adalat for dispute resolution, but the matter was already pending before a competent civil court and a civil suit had been filed. Under Sections 22-C(1) and 22-C(2) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, the Lok Adalat proceedings were …

RADHEY SHYAM MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a complainant, filed a complaint against the outgoing village Pradhan which was investigated and found baseless in a report dated 12.1.2026, with a final report submitted on 14.5.2026. Dissatisfied with the inquiry findings, the petitioner claimed that authorities had directed a …

YOGENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, an outgoing member of a Gram Panchayat, challenged a High Court order that appointed Sahayak Vikas Adhikari as an Administrator to exercise administrative powers after the outgoing Gram Pradhan's powers were seized. The court held that the appointment was a temporary measure pending …

POORAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pooran Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35639 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking permission to file an appropriate application in a related pending writ petition (No. 26201 of 2026). The petitioner’s counsel, Vineet Kumar Singh, prayed for a liberty order, while …

SUBHASH CHANDRA KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhash Chandra Kushwaha, challenged an order that seized his financial and administrative powers as Pradhan. The Court noted that his tenure had already expired, rendering the impugned order without legal effect. It further observed that recent Government Orders dated 25.04.2026 and …

TASLEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Tasleem, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his arms licence by the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petition did not contain an appeal against the order, which is required under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959. The High Court observed this procedural …

HARVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, who served as Pradhan from 2020 to 2025, faced a recovery citation of Rs. 4,12,717 under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, alleging embezzlement. The petitioner contended that a recovery order could not be issued without a specific order under Section 26 of the …

UMA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed a review application in the Allahabad High Court but failed to annex the required documents. Counsel for the applicants argued that the application was defective and sought liberty to file a fresh application with proper particulars. The court examined the procedural deficiency …

JITENDRA PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Jitendra Pal filed a writ petition seeking the court's intervention to expedite his application under Rule 25 of the Arms Rules, 2016 for a licence to be granted to a legal heir. The petition was argued by counsel Ashish Srivastava, while the State of U.P. and other respondents were …

M/S SILVER CITY INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Silver City Infratech Pvt. Ltd., claimed to be part of a consortium and challenged a revision petition filed by another partner under Section 41(3) of the Urban Planning and Development Act, which the Revisional Authority allowed. The petitioner argued that the revision was filed …

MD. TASNEEM REZAversusALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Md. Tasneem Reza, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against Aligarh Muslim University and two others. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the petition, asking the court to allow filing a fresh petition with better …

ALI MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ali Mohammad filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the second respondent to complete the renewal of his arms licence. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, who noted the prayer for renewal. No detailed factual or legal analysis was provided …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged an order passed under Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, contending that the order was ex parte and that notice had not been served. The Court held that the petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal or revision, even if the order was ex …

SIDDHI SINGH (MINOR)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a minor, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh writ with better particulars. The standing counsel for the respondents did not object to this request. …

MAHENDRA PAL SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Mahendra Pal Sagar filed Writ No. 35713 of 2026 challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner had already submitted a representation dated 27‑07‑2026 to the Joint Director of Education (Secondary), Bareilly, seeking redress before a Three Members …

SMT. HUSN ARAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Pradhan (2010-2015), challenged a recovery order dated 16 May 2026 under Section 27 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, asserting that she was not served notice and was denied a hearing, as the proceedings were concluded ex-parte after a five‑year delay. The Court examined …

LAKHAN LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Lakhan Lal challenged an order dated 15 July 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling and Land Holdings Act, 1960. The High Court observed that the Appellate Authority failed to apply its independent mind and merely reiterated the Prescribed …

NABAB SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner’s fair‑price shop licence was suspended in 2010 after an inspection allegedly found shortages of sugar and wheat, leading to an FIR under the Essential Commodities Act. The licensing authority cancelled the licence on 25‑Sept‑2010 after the petitioner’s explanation was deemed …

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusAKMAL NAEEM KHAN AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India, challenged an order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 17‑04‑2026 which resolved a dispute without conducting the mandatory conciliation process under Section 22‑C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued that the PLA …

AMIT KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Amit Kumar Maurya filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the licensing authority to transfer an arms licence, originally issued to his deceased father, to him under Rule 25(1)(b) of the Arms Rules, 2016. The Court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to inherit the licence and …

M/S R.K. CONTRACTOR AND SUPPLIERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s R.K. Contractor and Supplier, challenged a recovery certificate issued under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 after an award dated 27-03-2024 directed payment of Rs.10,91,216 to the deceased worker's mother and authorized the insurer to recover the amount from the …

KISHORE KUMAR AGRAWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide an objection dated 09-08-2026 that was pending before the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Agra Region. The petitioners argued that the objection had remained unresolved and …

FARIYAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Fariyad Ali filed a writ petition alleging that a labour court award dated 31-08-2024 had not been executed and the awarded amount had not been recovered from respondents 4 and 5, despite the award being communicated to the District Magistrate, Alipur. The petitioner sought the court's intervention …

SMT NATTHO DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Nattho Devi, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat dated 20‑06‑2022 that directed the repair of a drainage obstruction in a village. The petition was filed more than four years after the order, after an execution proceeding was initiated by the …

SADARUDDIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Sadaruddin Khan, an 80‑year‑old senior citizen, filed a writ petition under the Uttar Pradesh Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 seeking monthly maintenance from his sons, respondents No.4 and No.5, after alleging that his inherited property had been taken over by them. …

SANTRAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the cancellation of entries in the Parivar Register for 1995 and 2008, which was based on a belated appeal filed in 2021 under Section 6-A of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, instead of the appropriate 1970 Rules, without condoning the delay. The court also noted …

SANDEEP KUMAR GAUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Gaun, filed a writ petition seeking a fair price shop license on the basis that it was inherited from his grandfather and that his pending application should be decided expeditiously. The State's standing counsel argued that the petitioner might not fall within the …

AMIT KUMAR SINGH @ SONU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, an advocate, held three arms licences; two were previously cancelled but restored by this Court in Writ Petition No.24565/2023. The remaining licence, issued by the District of Kushinagar, was cancelled by the District Magistrate on the ground of a pending criminal case (Crime …

SUBASH CHANDRA @ SUBHASH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Subash Chandra filed a writ petition challenging an order from a departmental inquiry. The petitioner's counsel conceded that, as a complainant, the petitioner lacked locus standi to contest the order. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to the petitioner's request to withdraw. …

M/S VINOD KUMAR AND BROTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s Vinod Kumar and Brothers, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed in appeal and revision against a notice issued by the Mandi Samiti under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Niyamawali, 1965. They sought permission to withdraw the petitions, contending that they had …

M/S VINOD KUMAR AND BROTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petition (Writ C No. 34996 of 2026) filed by M/s Vinod Kumar and Brothers against the State of U.P. and two others was heard by the Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. Counsel for the petitioner was Awadhesh Kumar Mishra and counsel for the respondents were Archit Mandhyan, C.S.C. The court …

PANNA LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Pradhan, challenged a District Magistrate's order that imposed a one‑third penalty on him, removed him from administrative duties, and imposed the remaining penalties on other officials following an inquiry into a boundary‑wall construction. The inquiry report exonerated the …

MAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Man Singh filed a writ petition challenging the non‑compliance with an earlier direction dated 26‑August‑2025 in Writ Petition No.29137 of 2025. The petitioner also raised the issue of a cap on loan recovery, seeking guidance on its determination. The court noted that the cap should be considered in …

SANJAY SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh Yadav, filed a writ petition challenging the Appellate Authority's refusal to grant interim relief under the Nagar Niyojan Adhiniyam, 1973 in a demolition matter. The petitioner changed his counsel on the hearing date, leading the court to question the bonafide nature of …

M/S MAHESH EDIBLE OIL INDUSTRIES LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mahesh Edible Oil Industries Ltd purchased mustard seeds from outside Uttar Pradesh and used them to produce mustard oil at its Agra plant. The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti issued a notice under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 and the 1965 Rules requiring the petitioner to …

MAHI PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Mahi Pal alleged that his fair price shop licence was suspended on 27‑12‑2005 and possibly later cancelled, but he does not possess the suspension or cancellation orders. An FIR was lodged against him under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, and he was acquitted by a …

UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusAYODHYA PRASAD AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Up State Road Transport Corporation, paid a retiring workman, Ayodhya Prasad, gratuity based on his last salary and later adjusted it under the 7th Pay Commission. The workman subsequently filed a claim before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for …

YADVENDRA PRATAP SHAHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yadvendra Pratap Shahi held two arms licences issued in 1998 and 2003. An FIR lodged in 2015 alleged that he, along with co‑accused, disturbed the counting of votes, and the trial remains pending. In 2022 a notice was issued to cancel his licences, and the District Magistrate cancelled …

DAYARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dayaram, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 23 April 2026 that permitted him to join as a Class IV outsourcing employee. The respondent college acknowledged the order and the petitioner’s appointment. The court found that there was no substantive dispute …

ATUL KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Atul Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7445 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and six other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Satendra Tripathi, requested that the petition be disposed of with …

KAIF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kaif Khan, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after his father's death. He allegedly appeared on the date fixed before the Registrar, but no evidence was produced, leading the respondents to claim he did not appear and was therefore not desirous of appointment. …