Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY

431 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

MANOJ KUMAR SINGH AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, a group of thirteen applicants, filed a writ petition seeking a judicial order to relax the age limit for a recruitment advertised on 04‑09‑2025. They argued that the age restriction barred them from participating and requested the court to issue a mandamus directing the authorities …

JOGENDER PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jogender Prasad, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 16‑04‑2026 issued by the Joint Director of Education, Gorakhpur, which summoned him to appear on 30‑04‑2026. The petitioner argued that the authority had no jurisdiction to issue such a notice and that the petition …

DR. SURABHI SRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Surabhi Srivastava, a Subordinate Gazetted Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking fixation of her seniority after being promoted on 26 October 2017 and joining the post on 25 August 2018. The petitioner argued that her seniority had not been fixed, which could impede future …

AJIT SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a professor in the Orthopaedics department of Banaras Hindu University (B.H.U.), claimed entitlement to act as Head of Department (HOD) under the university's rotation policy. The Vice Chancellor had earlier appointed the Dean of the Faculty of Modern Medicine as interim HOD by order …

SMT.MANJU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Manju Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioners, represented by Senior Advocate Shantanu Khare and counsel Ashok Khare with Mohd. Yaseen, argued that the impugned order was contrary to a precedent set by a coordinate …

ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLA AND OTHERSversusD.I.O.S. AND OTHERS

The petitioners Arvind Kumar Shukla, Pawan Kumar Tiwari and Ramesh Chandra Yadav challenged the cancellation of their appointments by the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) in 1999, arguing that a stay order on the termination prevented any further termination. The court noted that the interim …

PREM NARAIN SHUKLAversusD.D.E.MADHYAMIK and OTHERS

The petitioner, Prem Narain Shukla, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 April 1998 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Varanasi, which rejected his claim for appointment. The petition sought relief against the administrative decision but no interim order was granted and …

AKHILESH RANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Akhilesh Rana challenged an order dated 27 June 2015 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Ghaziabad, on the ground that the appellate authority had not properly considered the representation filed on 11 May 2015, particularly the points raised in paragraph 5(2) and (3). …

SANTOSH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA and ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. and OTHERS

Santosh Kumar Srivastava and another filed a writ petition in 1998 challenging orders dated 7 January 1998 and 25 September 1997 that denied them employee status and stopped their salary under the Uttar Pradesh State University Act, 1973. The High Court initially stayed the salary stoppage and …

ARVIND TIWARI AND OTHERSversusDISTT. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND OTHERS

The petitioners were appointed to short‑term vacancies as Assistant Teachers under a resolution dated 18‑08‑1997, but the District Inspector of Schools (D.I.O.S.) disapproved their appointments on 02‑02‑2000, citing a state‑wide ban on such appointments. The High Court issued an interim order …

RAJPATI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajpati Yadav filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑06‑2022. The petitioner relied on a prior decision of a coordinate bench in Tej Pal Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors (2024) which had been allowed with a direction to issue a fresh regularisation order in accordance with the …

PAWAN KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 ORS.

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Tiwari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition sought relief against the respondents, though the specific grounds were not detailed in the present order. The Court, …

SMT. LALITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Lalita Devi, filed a writ petition challenging the calculation of a component of interest, seeking its increase to 12% against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition argued that the interest component was incorrectly computed. The High Court examined the …

C/M HITKARI KISAN INTER COLLEGEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hitkari Kisan Inter College, filed a writ petition (Writ A No. 6824 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the Court found no sufficient grounds to grant the relief. …

NAVEEN VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Naveen Verma, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7909 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Vivek Kumar Singh, while the respondents were represented by Abhitab Kumar …

DR. TAPAS KUMAR DASversusHARISH CHANDRA RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND 3 OTHERS

Dr. Tapas Kumar Das, an associate professor at Harish Chandra Research Institute, was the subject of ten sexual harassment complaints filed by female students covering the period 2013‑2016. The Institute’s Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) investigated under the Sexual Harassment of Women at …

NEERAJ KUMAR NIRALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar Nirala, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The dispute centered on whether the respondents had accepted the petitioner’s option to continue working only until the age of 60 years. …

OM PRAKASH MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Om Prakash Maurya filed Writ‑A No. 5519 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petition was argued by senior counsel Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi and Samarath Singh for the petitioner and by C.S.C. and Manish Nath …

UJJAWAL MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Ujjawal Mishra filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents, alleging that a private school was subject to judicial review. The petitioner could not demonstrate any legal basis for the writ's maintainability against a private educational …

SHYAM SUNDAR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Shyam Sundar Chauhan challenged his suspension dated 10‑02‑2026, arguing that no inquiry had been initiated and he had performed his duties diligently. The respondent, the State of U.P., indicated that a charge‑sheet, if not already filed, would be submitted within a week. The Court …

SMT. UMA SRIVASTAVA (RETD. LECTURER)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Uma Srivastava, a retired lecturer, filed a writ petition challenging a consequential order dated 26 September 2025 that cited a recovery of a loan of Rs. 40,000, which she claims has already been repaid. She did not contest the earlier notice dated 22 October 2024 nor the …

BHARTENDU SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Bhartendu Singh and five others, filed a writ petition seeking the benefit of gratuity from the State of Uttar Pradesh. Their counsel, Gautam Baghel, submitted the petition along with supporting documents. The court examined the petition and observed that the petitioners need to …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar and four others, filed a writ petition seeking the benefit of gratuity from the State of Uttar Pradesh. Their counsel, Gautam Baghel, relied on the petition and annexed documents to assert a right to gratuity. The respondents, represented by C.S.C., did not contest …

KAMLESH KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kamlesh Kumar Yadav and another, appointed as government employees in 2003 and 2009 respectively, challenged an order dated 07.01.2025 that stopped their salaries. The petitioners argued that no formal inquiry or charge sheet had been issued against them despite a complaint concerning …

SHRI PRAKASH PAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Shri Prakash Pal and three others filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State of U.P., contending that a later decision in Idrish Akhtar v. State of U.P. (2026:AHC:5230) was not placed before the respondents and that the new legal position now favours them. The petitioners …

RAVINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ravinder Kumar filed a writ petition seeking permission to participate in the 2025 Assistant Teacher Trained Graduate Grade Mains Examination, alleging that his application was not considered because it was received after the deadline. The respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, argued that …

VIKASH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Vikash Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to be appointed on compassionate grounds. The High Court observed that the petitioner's request for joining on such a basis is still under consideration by the authorities. Since the matter is pending and there is no evident legal bar, the Court …

BRIJ LAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Brij Lal Singh, a retired Assistant Engineer of U.P. Jal Nigam, was served with a charge sheet two years after his retirement alleging negligence and diversion of funds in two rural drinking water projects. He contested the charges, arguing that the inquiry findings showed only carelessness, no …

KANAHAIYA LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged a suspension order dated 22/26 November 2018, seeking relief after an eight‑year pendency of the writ petition. The petitioner’s counsel could not provide information on whether an administrative inquiry, if any, had been concluded. The court held that without such …

RAJ KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking interest on a delayed payment of his General Provident Fund (GPF) amount for a period of six months. He alleged that the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other officials, had caused the …

ANURADHA SAXENA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anuradha Saxena and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners' counsel argued that the matter was already decided by the Court in Ritu Singh & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2025 AHC 176959. The Court …

KRISHNAKANT TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnakant Tripathi, filed a writ petition seeking payment of his Government Provident Fund (GPF) amount and interest thereon from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioners were represented by advocates Basu Dev and Shailesh Narayan Upadhyay, while the …

PREETI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Preeti Singh, an employee of the State of Uttar Pradesh, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her maternity leave request, alleging that the impugned order did not state any reasons. The petitioner sought a direction that the respondents disclose the grounds for denial. The …

DR SANDEEP KUMAR CHAUDHARY AND 38 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 39 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the implementation of the DACP Scheme. The Court observed that the large number of petitioners made the facts jumbled and that a collective petition was not appropriate. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, …

PRADEEP KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Pandey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petitioner's counsel argued that the issues raised were already decided in the Court's earlier judgment in Shanker Prasad Yadav v. State of …

SURSENAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sursenap, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was found to be deficient as it did not contain necessary details or supporting documents to substantiate the …

ASHUTOSH KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking permission to participate in a selection interview. No interim relief was obtained and the selection process was completed, granting rights to the selected candidates. The petitioner did not appear for the hearing, and the standing counsel argued …

AKHILENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, three contractual lecturers, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑08‑2018 that refused to extend their employment tenure. No petitioner appeared before the court, and the petition was listed as likely to become infructuous due to the passage of time. The learned …

KAZIM HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kazim Hasan, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6365 of 2026) challenging a decision of the State of U.P. The petition was filed despite an earlier order dated 05‑02‑2026 that had already rejected the petitioner’s claim, and the petitioner had not appealed that order. The Court noted …

ASHISH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusBANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashish Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation of their appointments as Junior Clerk Level‑II at Banaras Hindu University. They specifically pressed the first part of the second prayer, asking that their claim be considered for regularisation. The …

IRFAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Irfan Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after his father's death in harness in 2020, submitting a belated representation dated 19‑02‑2024. The High Court, without delving into the merits, disposed of the petition, directing that the claim for …

RAJPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajpal Singh filed a writ petition challenging a prior judgment of this Court in Radheshyam Shukla v. State of U.P. concerning the period of communication prescribed therein. The petitioner sought relief on the ground that the earlier decision was erroneous. The Court examined the prayer …

PRAGYA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Pragya Pandey filed a writ petition seeking her reinstatement, alleging that the decision on her claim has been pending for more than six years with no order either in her favour or against. The petitioners were represented by Ashutosh Srivastava and Devansh Misra, while the State of U.P. and other …

JAI NARAYAN PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jai Narayan Pandey, filed Writ‑A No. 4104 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the day of hearing, and the petitioner himself was also absent. The same situation had occurred on an earlier date when the petitioner's counsel was …

SATISH CHANDRA SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satish Chandra Shukla, filed Writ A No. 4678 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, ordering the …

RIPUNJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ripunjay Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petitioner sought a declaration in paragraph 46 of the petition, asserting that the order could not be appealed. The High Court observed that the declaration was incorrect …

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT AND ANOTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Committee of Management and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The matter was heard by Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The court dismissed the petition. The order directs that details be …

SANGEETA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta Agarwal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking the grant of a family pension and related benefits. The petition challenged the denial of her representation for the pension by the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The Court examined whether …

OJAS SHANDILYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ojas Shandilya, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was argued by senior counsel Jigar Khare and Shivendu Ojha. The court, after hearing, observed that the petition lacked sufficient particulars and directed that it be dismissed. However, the court …

UMAPATI DIXITversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against the Union of India and others. The High Court directed the petitioner to join the concerned institution on 7 May 2026 at 10 a.m. and to report before the concerned respondent, who would permit his joining. The respondents' counsel informed …

SANDEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed Writ‑A No. 4829 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of Rs.1,000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order also …

RAMA RANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rama Rani, filed a writ petition seeking promotion. During the pendency of the petition, the grievance regarding the promotion was resolved by the authorities. The petitioner's counsel requested that the writ petition be disposed of on this ground. The State's standing counsel had no …

SMT. PRATIBHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Pratibha Singh, an officiating Headmistress, filed a writ petition challenging the adequacy of her current salary. The petition was filed against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The High Court examined the grievance but did not issue a substantive order on the salary …

DILEEP KUMAR BATHAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dileep Kumar Batham, filed a writ petition challenging an order related to the qualification of respondent No.5 and the date of consideration for promotion. The petitioner’s counsel, Alok Dwivedi, expressed that he did not wish the Court to decide the matter on its merits after …

RAJ NARAYAN SHUKLAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Narayan Shukla filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31‑12‑2025. He relied on a prior decision of this Court in Tej Pal Singh v. State of U.P. (Writ‑A No.7464 of 2019) which had been set aside and directed a fresh order for regularisation. The petitioner argued that the …

ABU TALAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged an order dated 4‑10‑2025 dismissing two assistant teachers, arguing that his own dismissal dispute could be decided independently of that matter. The respondents contended that the outcome of the other teachers' dismissal would affect the petitioner's relief. The court …

DR. FARHAT BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Farhat Bano, filed a writ petition seeking two reliefs, but later instructed counsel to pursue only the second prayer, which sought consideration of a representation for fixation of pension in accordance with law. The High Court examined the petition and determined that the …

PREM KISHORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a university employee, was suspended on 15 November 2025 and a charge sheet was served on 21 November 2025, after which a reply was filed but no inquiry report has been produced. The petitioner contended that he was unaware whether the suspension order had been communicated to the …

AJIT PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ajit Pratap Singh filed a writ petition seeking direction for an ad‑hoc service order to enable him to claim a pension. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that the matter should be dealt with by the concerned department. The Court, noting a prior coordinate‑bench decision in …

RAVINDRA NATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravindra Nath Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of his pension. He alleged that the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, had failed to process his pension claim. The petition was heard by a learned Senior Advocate for the …

SUSHIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Sushil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and equal work equal pay, requesting a writ of mandamus against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The Court examined the petition and found that the pleadings did not substantively support the relief claimed, rendering the …

GAURAV SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Gaurav Singh filed a writ petition seeking relief, presumably a transfer, but failed to produce a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the competent authority of his former college. The High Court examined the impugned order dated 15-04-2026 and found the reasons for rejecting the petition …

DR NEELAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Dr. Neelam Singh filed a writ petition seeking payment of his pension from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioner limited his relief to pension payment and indicated he would file a fresh representation within two weeks. The standing counsel for the State accepted that the …

SMT DARAKHSHAN BILGRAMIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking voluntary retirement from service under the Uttar Pradesh State Aided Higher Secondary School Teachers Death and Retirement Gratuity Rules, 1981. The petitioner submitted an application dated 26‑11‑2025 for voluntary retirement and …

RAJEEV KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajeev Kumar and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking the grant of a specific pay scale for a post. The petitioners' counsel was unable to cite any specific legal provision or factual averment supporting their claim. The Court noted the lack of a …

DEVENDRA SINGH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

A writ petition filed by eleven petitioners sought salary entitlement as Principal while they were serving as Officiating Principals, relying on a prior judgment (Special Appeal No.209 of 2026). The High Court observed that although the cause of action was common, the orders required separate …

CHHATRAPATI PANDEY AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

A writ petition filed by nine petitioners sought relief regarding their salary as Principals while serving as Officiating Principals, invoking a prior judgment (Special Appeal No.209 of 2026). The Court observed that although the cause of action was common, the orders required separate authorities, …

SMT SALMA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Salma Khatoon and another filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioners alleged that the impugned order was rendered without consideration of two Government Orders dated 20 May 2025 and 21 May 2025. The Court examined the …

HARIDARSHAN KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Haridarshan Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petition was found to be deficient in particulars, prompting the petitioner’s counsel to seek liberty to file a fresh petition with …

RAJNEESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajneesh Kumar, a 34‑year‑old, filed a writ petition seeking the retirement dues of his deceased father from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel was unable to cite any statutory provision that would entitle him to such dues. The court noted the …

OMVATI SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Omvati Shakya, filed a writ petition seeking to have his gender changed in the records for the Assistant Teacher Examination and to be considered under the female reservation category. The court observed that the examination had originally considered the petitioner under the male …

SHIV CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Shiv Chand filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel sought liberty to withdraw the present petition and file a fresh one with more detailed particulars. The court considered the request and granted …

SMT RITUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a contract teacher who also served as a warden, was found to have failed to refer a student with indigestion to a hospital, leading to the cancellation of her contract. The petitioner argued that the termination violated the principles of natural justice and sought relief through a …

AMANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aman, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment as Multi Tasking Staff. The court found that he is eligible for such an appointment and is placed at serial number 69 in the relevant list, which has moved to serial number 66 as of 23‑04‑2026. The court noted that his …

SUPRIT JOHN JOSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suprit John Joshi, a government employee, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking direction for the payment of arrears of salary. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others, contended that the grievance should be raised through the appropriate …

KAILASH NATH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Kailash Nath Sharma filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition was not maintainable because the dispute pertained to a private school/college, which is outside the …

SOMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sompal Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, requested that the petition be disposed of while granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court considered the …

RAVINDRA BHATTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravindra Bhatt filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner alleged that his salary dues had not been paid and sought relief through the writ. The Court observed that …

LIYAKAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Liyakat Ali filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to address his grievance regarding salary. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should not be decided on its merits and requested that the mandamus prayer be considered. The Court held …

ANIL KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner alleged that his salary dues had not been paid despite his entitlement. The respondents did not …

PROF. ANIL KUMAR VARSHNEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Prof. Anil Kumar Varshney filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6813 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The court noted that the petitioner had earlier filed an appeal on 14‑08‑2024 before the Vice‑Chancellor of Raja Mahendra Pratap Singh …

SHYAM KISHORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Kishor, filed a writ petition claiming he was appointed as a Class‑IV employee and sought relief against the respondents, the State of U.P. and the Committee of Management. The petitioner could not produce an appointment letter or evidence of a due selection process …

ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Tripathi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking payment of arrears of salary from the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petitioner alleged that his salary dues remained unpaid and approached the court for relief. The court examined …

SHYAM BABU PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Shyam Babu Pandey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed by the respondents, the State of U.P. and four others. The petitioner, through Senior Advocate Ashok Khare and V.D. Shukla, relied on judgments of coordinate benches of the same court that allegedly …

OM KANT DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Kant Dubey, filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging the appointment of respondent No.6 as a lecturer in Art at National Inter College Bhogaon, alleging a legally defective selection process. The petitioner was on a short‑term appointment and therefore lacked standing to contest …

DR JAG PRASAD CHATURVEDIversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Jag Prasad Chaturvedi, filed a writ petition alleging that he was not receiving his current pension despite an interim order dated 06.02.2024 directing payment. The petitioner claimed the delay was due to the absence of a Pension Payment Order. The respondents, the State and two …

MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manoj, the husband of a woman who died within five years of marriage, is charged under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He has been in custody since December 2021 and has filed three bail applications, all of which were rejected. The court examined …

NASIRUDDINversusU.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATION AND OTHERS

The petitioner, a labourer, was disciplined for alleged theft and punished with stoppage of three annual increments on 9 November 1998. He appealed under Clause 'O' of the Standing Order of the Sugar Industry of U.P., but the appellate authority not only disagreed with the disciplinary order but …

SMT KAMLESH VERRMA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UPAND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Kamlesh Verma and three others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition was listed in Court No. 32 and was heard by Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. Counsel for the petitioners was …

UDAIVEER SINGH SOLANKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Udaiveer Singh Solanki and another filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14851 of 2023) against the State of U.P. and others, but no petitioner appeared before the court. The standing counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition should be disposed of in accordance with the Full …

AVNEET KAUR AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting …

DR. ANAND BABU AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Anand Babu and ten other petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The court disposed of the petition, directing reference to the detailed order in the case of …

YATISH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Yatish Singh, appointed as a Shramik in 1988, discovered that his date of birth recorded in his service book (19‑Oct‑1967) had been overwritten to 14‑Apr‑1966, which would accelerate his retirement. The respondents ordered his retirement on 30‑Apr‑2026 based on a 2005 Transfer Certificate …

NARENDRA KUMARversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners claimed they were appointed as Assistant Professors under a 2008 advertisement but could not join because earlier honorarium appointments led to writ petitions, which were resolved by a full bench in Dr. Archana Mishra v. State of U.P. (2018). The respondents suggested remitting the …

VINOD KUMAR SINGHversusState of U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 12‑03‑2024 and 21‑03‑2024 passed by the State of U.P. and others. He relied on a prior decision of a co‑ordinate bench in Tej Pal Singh v. State of U.P. (Writ‑A No. 7464 of 2019) which had been set aside and remanded …

KAMAL KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kamal Kumar Sharma, was demoted by an order dated 27.03.2026 issued by the District Inspector of Schools, Aligarh, without being heard or served notice. The petitioner challenged the ex parte nature of the order, arguing a violation of natural justice. The High Court observed that …

SANTOSH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Santosh Kumar and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was challenged on the ground that it lacked sufficient particulars. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court, …

MRS BIMLESH BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, a lecturer at an aided college in Agra, sought transfer of her posting to her native place, Meerut, invoking provisions of the Intermediate Act, 1921. She filed a writ petition after an earlier application to the Additional Director of Education, requesting a fresh application within …

RAMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Ramveer Singh filed a writ petition seeking the grant of a selection grade, alleging that the concerned authority had not decided the matter. The petition was filed without attaching the circular that purportedly supported his claim. The Court observed this procedural defect but chose not …

SMT. KARUNA NIRALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Karuna Nirala, filed a writ petition challenging the existence of a post of System Analyst in the EDP Cadre of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner sought judicial intervention to compel the State to recognize or create the post. The respondents, the State and two other …

DESH RAJ SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Desh Raj Singh and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five others. The petitioners were represented by Kamla Kant Mishra and Varun Mishra, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. and Grijesh Tiwari. The Court observed that …

SATYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyam Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Aishwarya Pratap Singh, applied to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh writ petition with more detailed particulars. The Court considered the …

SMT JYOTI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Jyoti Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary arrears since her appointment on 19-05-2025, alleging that no salary had been paid to date. The petitioner was summoned to appear before the Director of Education (Secondary) on 16-02-2026 but did not attend, claiming …

SMT DEV PRABHA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Dev Prabha Sharma, a contractual Warden‑cum‑Teacher at Kasturba Gandhi Residential Girls School, Bareilly, challenged the non‑renewal of her 2025‑26 contract on the ground that no hearing was afforded before the adverse order. She argued that she had served continuously since …

BRIJ PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brij Pal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to expedite an inquiry against a private respondent. The Court examined whether a complainant has locus standi to compel the court to accelerate such an inquiry. It held that the …

JYOTI GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

In Writ A No. 6672 of 2026, petitioner Jyoti Gupta challenged a cancellation of transfer order issued by the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner argued that the order was passed without being heard. The court noted a prior decision in Writ A No. 6082 of 2026 where a similarly worded …

JALESHWAR NATH PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jaleshwar Nath Pandey and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the applicability of a pension scheme administered by the State of Uttar Pradesh. They contended that the scheme was being applied incorrectly to them. The respondents, the State of …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar, a government employee, filed a writ petition alleging that arrears of salary amounting to approximately Rs. 1.85 lakh, due after re-fixation, have not been paid by the State of U.P. and other respondents. The High Court examined the grievance and directed the petitioner to …

ARVIND KUMARversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court examined a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑April‑2024 that dismissed the petitioner's claim because his name was absent from a 2016 inspection list related to a grant‑in‑aid. The petitioner relied on a Zila Vidyalaya Nirikshan report dated 8‑April‑2024, arguing …

BALBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Balbir Singh, filed a writ petition challenging his own transfer order as well as that of Respondent‑5. The court noted that notice to Respondent‑5 had been issued but no service report was on record, and there was no interim order. Considering these procedural deficiencies, the …

NARAYANI PRASAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, U.P., to decide representations submitted on 18‑06‑2025 and 16‑07‑2025 within a fixed period. The petitioner’s counsel also requested permission to file a fresh representation and a …

VED PRAKASH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Sharma, retired on 31 January 2025 and filed a writ petition seeking payment of his retiral dues from the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court, without delving into the …

AISHWARYA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Aishwarya Singh filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment after her husband died in harness on 24-11-2025. The respondents, including a bank, asked her to submit certain documents by email on 24-12-2025, which she had not yet filed. The petitioner acknowledged the request …

NIRANJAN LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former employee of U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural), retired on 31 July 2021 and filed a writ petition alleging that he had not been informed of the total dues payable to him, nor the manner of their payment. He also raised concerns about a pending group insurance claim. The respondents, …

GANESHI LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a retired employee of U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), filed a writ petition seeking payment of pending dues to fund his daughter's marriage scheduled for 5 May 2026. The department acknowledged financial constraints but promised to clear at least one-quarter of the dues before the marriage …

RAVINDRA KUMAR BARKHIYAversusCHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR

The petitioner, a Scientific Officer/D at the Narora Atomic Power Station, suffers from chronic liver disease and sought a transfer from Bulandshahr to the QA Office in Noida to facilitate easier access to medical treatment. The employer rejected the request, stating that the Noida post is …

YASHWANT CHAUHAN AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, who had participated in a 2016 recruitment process for Technical Grade‑II apprentices at U.P. Power Corporation, were initially selected but later omitted from the revised list of 12‑12‑2017. They sought to benefit from a Supreme Court order dated 12 Oct 2022, issued under Article …

VIVEK SHARMAversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Vivek Sharma, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking promotion after being exonerated in a disciplinary inquiry dated 16‑06‑2023. The State had not taken a final decision on his case, whereas a similar case involving Arun Kumar Sharma was resolved on 22‑08‑2024 with the inquiry report …

SMT SAVITRI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Savitri Devi, the widow of the late Dulare Lal, a retired Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Ghiror, filed a writ petition seeking the payment of his post‑retirement benefits, including pension, gratuity, GPF, and family pension, which remained unpaid after his death in 2020. The petitioner …

AVINASH KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar Srivastava, was initially appointed as a daily‑wage steno‑cum‑typist in 1990 and later converted to a co‑adunate employee, with his regularisation pending while juniors were regularised earlier. He filed a writ petition seeking regularisation effective from 1 April …

BABA BHANWARNATH MANDIR SEVA SAMITIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Baba Bhanwarnath Mandir Seva Samiti filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel later moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn at …

RIBHU DUBEYversusGAUTAM BUDDHA UNIVERSITY AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ribhu Dubey, was expelled from Gautam Buddha University and filed a writ petition challenging the expulsion. The petitioner’s counsel argued that an alternative remedy exists in the form of an appeal before the university's Board of Management. The university’s counsel raised no …

SMT. SHANTI DEVIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 15128 of 1981) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the …

GHINAHU AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 14665 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal …

GOPAL DUTT S/O JAG RAMversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Gopal Dutt, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or prosecute the case. No counsel appeared on his behalf to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited …

LALLAN AND OTHERSversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 15936 of 1983) was filed by Lallan and others against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal …

KHACHERUversusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS

The petition, filed in 1982, sought relief against the Deputy Director of Consolidation concerning a claim of adverse possession over land. The private respondent, represented by legal heirs, alleged title based on adverse possession, but the claim was rejected because the required possession …

IRFAN KHANversusBOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHAERS

Dismiss

Irfan Khan filed a writ petition (Writ‑B No. 1806 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the Board of Revenue and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay …

ANEES AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anees Ahmad, vacated government premises and challenged the respondents' calculation of a penal rent amounting to approximately Rs. 11 lakh. The petitioner objected to the calculation but did not provide detailed particulars. The High Court observed that the two writ petitions filed …

SURESH KUMAR BHARTIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Suresh Kumar Bharti, a law officer in the Varanasi Development Authority, challenged a disciplinary order that stopped two salary increments, alleging that the procedure violated principles of natural justice under the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. The …

ANEES AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Anees Ahmad against the State of U.P. and three others was heard before Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The petition was disposed of, with the Court directing that the orders be found in Writ Petition No.2164 of 2026. No substantive findings on …

PRABHAT MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 10723 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent‑Bank was represented by Advocate Harshul Bhatnagar. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of …

JAGESHVARversusUP STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jageshvar, filed a writ petition challenging the alleged lesser payment of his retiral dues by Up State Bridge Corporation Ltd and others. The petitioner sought relief from the High Court of Allahabad. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, did not grant immediate relief …

SMT. RANIversusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Rani filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the payment of her retiral dues by U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. and other respondents, alleging that the amount paid was less than what she was entitled to. The petitioner sought relief through the writ petition. The …

PREM RAJ AND 26 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of contract workers, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to regularise their employment. The Court observed that the petition did not cite any legal provision that would entitle the petitioners to regularisation. Consequently, the …

SMT NEETUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt Neetu filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 28‑03‑2026 of the District Basic Education Officer, Baghpat, which rejected her maternity‑leave application without giving any reasons. The High Court had earlier, in Writ‑A No. 1944 of 2026, directed the officer to consider the …

MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH DOHAREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Mahendra Pratap Singh Dohare, filed a writ petition seeking payment of arrears of salary. The petition was filed without any specific supporting documents and the annexed representation was vague. The Court observed that the prayer was not backed by concrete evidence but, in the …

KUSHMA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kushma Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pay arrears of family pension and other pecuniary benefits due after the death of her husband, a Class‑IV employee, on 06‑11‑2017. The petitioner alleged that while …

NEERAJ KUMAR SINGHAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar Singhai, who was engaged as a Part‑Time Instructor, filed a writ petition seeking renewal of his engagement. He alleged that the authorities had not acted on his request for renewal. The Court observed that the prayers in the petition were not properly framed. However, …

SHRIDHAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shridhar Pandey filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 21 September 2022 issued in Writ‑A No. 1037 of 2011. The respondent argued that the petitioner could be denied the benefit because he had not filed a certified copy of that order before the concerned respondent. The court …

RAM NARAYAN VERMA AND 25 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 26 teachers including Ram Narayan Verma, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary for periods during which they served as Ad hoc/Officiating Headmasters. They contended that they were entitled to the same remuneration as regular headmasters for the duties …

SURYA PRATAP SHARMA AND 177 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 178 individuals, filed Writ‑A No. 5570 of 2026 challenging a governmental action. The petition was dismissed because the supporting affidavit was executed by a pairokar who had no disclosed relationship with the petitioners, who reside in different districts, and the …

AWADHESH NARAYAN SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Awadhesh Narayan Shukla, a retired employee of Nagar Palika Parishad, Padrauna, claimed that his gratuity of approximately Rs.11 lakhs, due upon retirement in 2023, had not been paid. He filed a writ petition seeking direction for payment of the pending gratuity. The respondents, …

RAJARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajaram, a former Shiksha Mitra who retired at the age of 60, filed a writ petition challenging a Government Order dated 17‑02‑2023 that fixed the retirement age for Shiksha Mitras at 60 years. He argued that the order was arbitrary because the retirement age for regularly appointed …

RAM KUMAR YADAV AND 13 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Kumar Yadav and 13 others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and four others. The petition was heard by Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The court, without examining the merits, disposed of the petition by referring to the order in …

BRAHAM JEET SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, a group of retired assistant teachers, filed a writ petition seeking gratuity, pension and related benefits after retiring at the age of 62. They relied on a prior judgment of this Court but failed to cite the specific provisions supporting their claim. The earlier writ petition …

ADITYA PRAKASH DIWAKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Aditya Prakash Diwakar filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his appeal pending before the Chairman of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd be decided within two months. The petitioner argued that the delay was prejudicial, while the respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, assured …

BARUN KISHOR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Barun Kishor Shukla filed a writ petition challenging a minor disciplinary punishment imposed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner argued that a statutory remedy exists under the Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited Establishment (Discipline and …

MAMTA CHANDELversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mamta Chandel, filed Writ Petition No. 5538 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, Jitendra Singh, Satish Chandra Dubey, and Vimal Chandra Mishra, moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh …

PRAMOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Junior Engineer with the Nagar Nigam, Shahjahanpur, was suspended by an order dated 25‑03‑2026 following the unauthorized removal and damage of four martyrs' statues by a construction agency. The petitioner claimed he was on station leave during the incident and that the agency …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, an Assistant Engineer of Nagar Nigam Shahjahanpur, was suspended by an order dated 25‑03‑2026 following the removal and damage of four martyrs' statues by a construction agency. The petitioner claimed he was on station leave from 20‑03‑2026 to 22‑03‑2026 and that the agency acted …

SMT. QAMRUNNISA AND OTHERSversusSMT. TAMIZAN AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The Allahabad High Court entertained multiple civil miscellaneous applications filed by the appellant Smt. Qamrunnisa and others. The court allowed the substitution applications, directing that the party list be corrected within a week. It also condoned the delay in filing the substitution …

PRABHA SHANKER SELOTversusBANK OF BARODA CORPORATE OFFICE AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Prabha Shanker Selot filed a writ petition against Bank of Baroda and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case. The respondents had filed a counter‑affidavit but the petitioner did not file a rejoinder. The court …

HARI CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. NAGAR VIKAS NAUBHAG-2 and ORS.

Hari Chand filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 19 July 2003 issued by the Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad, Rampur, and related letters from the District Magistrate. The petitioner alleged that the orders would cause irreparable loss. The Court examined the pleadings …

GYAN SINGHversusREGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LUCKNOW AND OTHERS

Dismissed on merits

Gyan Singh filed Writ‑A No. 36522 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the Registrar of Co‑Operative Societies, Lucknow and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear, while the State respondents were represented by standing counsel and counsel for …

RAM BARANversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Ram Baran filed writ petition No. 6376 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment was filed. The respondents were represented by counsel. The court observed the petitioner’s failure …

RAM BARANversusD.D.C. and OTHERS

Ram Baran filed Writ Petition No. 2323 of 1984 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and no request for adjournment was filed. The respondent's counsel, Dhiraj Srivastava, was …

D.B.UPADHYAYAversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petition filed by D.B. Upadhyaya, successor to the original owners of several plots in Haraiya village, challenged objections raised by respondents under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The respondents claimed adhivasi and sirdar rights based on revenue entries showing …

DHARMENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U P AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a bus conductor employed by the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC), was disciplined for a low load factor that allegedly caused a revenue loss of Rs. 3,22,123. After a charge sheet and inquiry, he was initially penalised with a token recovery of Rs. 50,000 and a …

SHIVANSHU DHURIYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a 16‑year‑old son of a deceased Development Officer, sought a compassionate appointment under the LIC's 1993 Instructions after his father died in service. His mother applied for the appointment in 2013 but only later disclosed that the younger daughter had married, while earlier she …

PARASNATH GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners, Parasnath Gupta and another, challenged an order dated 2 June 2014 that allowed a recall application filed by a contesting respondent and rejected the petitioners' revision on 12 September 2025. The petitioners claimed prejudice from the impugned order and sought relief under the …

YOGESH CHANDRA MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yogesh Chandra Mishra, filed writ petition No. 38833 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The Court therefore dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of …

SHAHZAD AHMAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shahzad Ahmad Khan filed a writ petition challenging an inquiry report issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner argued that the report was a final order and sought relief. The respondents contended that the report was not a final order and must be acted upon …

ANOOP SINGH TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anoop Singh Tomar, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39197 of 2025) challenging a mutation proceeding initiated by the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The Court observed that writ jurisdiction is generally unavailable for …

SATISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Satish Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ No. 39165 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging proceedings related to the mutation of his land records. The petition was filed against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. No counsel or parties appeared before the court on …

SRIRAM GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sriram Gupta, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State of U.P. and three other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the order could be contested through an alternative statutory remedy. The court observed that because an alternative remedy exists, …

RASHID ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rashid Ali, filed a writ petition alleging that he had not encroached upon the adjacent chak road. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to demarcate his land, which was essential to establish the claim. Consequently, the court found no evidence of encroachment …

SUSHIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the objection he raised in the allotment of a patta, seeking a declaration that he has the locus to file such objections. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, contended that the petition merely seeks a decision on …

RAJE LAL UTTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Raje Lal Uttam, filed a writ petition under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking relief against an order dated 18‑11‑2024. The petition referenced a certified copy of an earlier order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Writ C No. 18359/2022, but failed to attach that copy …

RAM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 57 OTHERS

Ram Prakash filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and 57 others seeking relief related to a demarcation process. During the pendency of the petition, the respondents, through their standing counsel, informed the court that the demarcation procedure had already been initiated, …

KANHAIYALALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Kanhaiyalal filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his application for restoration of a suit. The High Court examined whether the respondent authority could dismiss the restoration application despite a legal impediment and without hearing the petitioner on merits. The …

YUSUFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yusuf filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after his application for impleadment was dismissed by the trial court. The petitioner sought to challenge the dismissal and to be impleaded as a party in the underlying proceedings. The respondents contended that the writ petition …

NAVIRASOOLversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Navirasool, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to promptly conclude the pending proceedings of Case No. 396/1996 under Section 198(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat (U.P.Z.A.) and Land Revenue Act, as well as to decide an …

SURAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Suraj Kumar filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court while the trial was at the stage of recording his statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The status report indicated that the trial was at the “fag end” with the statement recording scheduled for 30 …

RAGHUBIRversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition which was not pursued, leading the court to dismiss it for want of prosecution. The court imposed a cost of Rs.1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee. It directed that any application for restoration of the petition would be entertained …

SURENDRA PAL SINGHversusJAI DEVI

Dismiss

The petition was filed by Surendra Pal Singh challenging a consolidation order issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, which was based on a revision filed by Jai Devi. The order readjusted the allocation of land parcels (chak) between the parties, rejecting the petitioner's claim to a …

HANUMAN DASversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Hanuman Das, filed writ petition No. 14836 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf during the hearing. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. A cost of Rs.1000 was imposed, to be deposited in the …