Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY

431 judgments · newest first · showing 401–431

DEORAJversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to prosecute the case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of Rs.1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The registry will …

MINHAJ ALI AND OTHERSversusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or prosecute the case. The court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs.1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The court directed that any …

UDAI NARAINversusD.D.C. AND OTHER

A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 157 of 1983) was filed by Udai Narain against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee. The …

SMT. NAGINA KUERversusD.D.C. AND AOTHER

Smt. Nagina Kuer filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf during the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs.1000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Registry was …

PRATAP SINGH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition in March 2021 seeking a direction to be allowed to attend an interview scheduled for 23 March 2021 for the post of Principal in a college. No interim relief was granted and the interview concluded; by 2025 the recruitment process was completed and the waiting …

SMT. RANI KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Rani Kumari, a Silai Teacher, filed a writ petition alleging that she was being paid the salary of a Class‑IV post, which she claimed was improper. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, contested the claim. The Court observed that there were several disputed …

ASHOK KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ashok Kumar Mishra filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of an earlier order dated 29‑03‑2023 that had directed continuation of his salary pending the outcome of an inquiry. The petitioner argued that the Deputy Director of Education had no statutory power to review his order under the …

DARA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Dara Singh filed a writ petition challenging the delay in his promotion to Workshop Superintendent, alleging that the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) had not been constituted as required by law. The petitioner argued that the promotion process, which had been initiated, remained …

BIPIN KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition (Writ‑A No. 12870 of 2021) filed by Bipin Kumar Maurya against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others was disposed of by the Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery on 18 March 2026. The order directs that for details the court’s earlier order in Writ‑A No. 10054 of 2021 should be …

RAMDULAR RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramdular Ram, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary arrears for the period 2010‑2016. The State of U.P. and other respondents rejected the claim on two grounds: a disciplinary inquiry against the petitioner was still pending, and the original service records indicated that …

GAURAV AGNIHOTRIversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaurav Agnihotri, son of the then Manager of the Committee of Management of a college, challenged his appointment alleging that it was not made through a fair process. The petitioner argued that his relationship with the Manager, who had an effective role in appointments, rendered …

MAMTA PANDEY @ MAMTA AGNIHOTRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Mamta Pandey filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5681 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Kushmondeya Shahi, later informed the court that the petition was to be withdrawn. The court …

PROFESSOR MURAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Professor Murad Ali, a sole professor in the Business Management department, challenged his removal as Head of Department and Dean, arguing that no other professor was available and that the appointments were on a rotational basis. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that the …

VIKASH SINGH PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vikash Singh Patel, filed a fourth bail application after being in custody since March 9, 2023. The trial is underway, with the investigation officer being examined and the prosecution seeking to call a new witness (PW‑8) not listed in the charge sheet. The applicant argued that the …

SMT ARTI VERMA AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, appointed on a contractual basis as Vice‑Principal and nursing staff in Uttar Pradesh para‑medical colleges, challenged the State's decision to refuse extending their contracts beyond the three‑year term prescribed in a Government Order of 15‑04‑2022 and to issue fresh …

KAMLESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS.

Petitioner Kamlesh Singh sought a transfer from the Animal Husbandry and Dairying department at Kulbhashkar Ashram Post Graduate College, Allahabad to Uday Pratap Autonomous College, Varanasi. An earlier order had directed the Director of Higher Education to decide the transfer, but the NOC issued …

KAMLESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kamlesh Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction on an inquiry into alleged irregularities in the appointment of respondent No.5 and others. The State respondents argued that the petition was a public interest litigation and therefore not maintainable in service matters. …

I.I.E. COLLEGE OF NURSINGversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petition was filed by I.I.E. College of Nursing challenging the denial of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) by the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, which cited deficiencies after three inspections. The petitioner argued that the inspection findings were erroneous and submitted documents to …

RAJJAB ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, appointed as Assistant Teacher in 1995 and later as Principal in 2023, challenged the withdrawal of his financial approval for the earlier post on the ground that the appointment was made during a period (1990-2004) when a single‑operation order allegedly barred the Committee of …

RAM NARESHversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

A writ petition was filed by Ram Naresh seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The High Court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the …

RAM LAKHAN AND OTHERSversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court to prosecute their writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Court directed that the petition may …

CHANDRAPAL AND ANNOTHERversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad but no counsel appeared on their behalf to prosecute the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs. 1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order …

SMT. SUBHAGI DEVIversusB.R. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but no counsel appeared on their behalf to prosecute the case. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs. 1,000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order …

HANSA AND OTHERSversusTHE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION DEORIA

A writ petition was filed by Hansa and others against the Assistant Director of Consolidation, Deoria. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the High Court …

SMT. CHANCHAL KUMARI SONKARversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Chanchal Kumari Sonkar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Abhay Raj Yadav, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court considered the request and dismissed the petition accordingly. No substantive factual or legal …

RAIS AHMAD MANAGER MADARSA RIZVIYA AHLE SUNNATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rais Ahmad, manager of Madarsa Rizviya Ahle Sunnat, filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel argued that the prayers in the petition were vague and requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, allowing …