Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
611 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking continuation of interim protection previously granted. The coordinating bench had directed the applicants to file a supplementary affidavit, which they failed to do despite receiving the interim order. On …
Rani and another filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 July 2026 passed by the Additional District and Session Judge in a session case involving offences under Sections 105 and 352 of the IPC. The High Court examined the record and …
The applicants Ram Lal Mishra and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 6 February 2026 and a summoning order dated 11 June 2026 in criminal case No. 635 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 351(3) and 324(2) of the BNSS. They …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 26‑04‑2025 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑12‑2025 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the BNS. The applicant contended that these offences are …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 328, 354 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and argued that the material on record did not …
The petitioners, Chhotu @ Akhilesh and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 11‑05‑2026, the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 12177 of 2026) arising out of Crime No. …
The applicant, Roshani Chaurasiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 29‑11‑2025 in a criminal case under Sections 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS. The applicant contended that these offences are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 4‑December‑2025 issued by the Gram Nyayalay, Kaushambi, which had treated a charge‑sheet as a police case. The applicants argued that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of …
Shiv Narayan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑09‑2022 and the criminal proceedings (Case No.1486 of 2023) relating to IPC offences 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed that a compromise between the parties had …
The applicants, Laxmi Tiwari and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The counsel for the applicants sought dismissal of the application on the ground that it was not pressed. The learned Additional Government Advocate …
The applicant, Sushil Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.3600323 of 2006) pending before the Small Cause Judge/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, arising from offences under Sections …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.85 of 2008) arising from offences under Sections 326, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise dated 16‑07‑2025, which was verified by the magistrate …
The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act filed by Vashu Dev Manjhi seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑04‑2025, the cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the entire proceedings of case no. 97720 of 2025. The applicant alleged false …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 166877 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 270 of 2024, which alleged offences under sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 324(4) BNS. The applicants contended that the FIR contained …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 09.01.2025 and the cognizance order dated 27.06.2025 in State v. Prahlad @ Pawan Dixit and others, relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a land dispute. They contended that the FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings were filed to harass them and that the underlying dispute was already pending as …
Mukesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in criminal case No. 598 of 2025, which arose from an FIR under Section 406 IPC. The High Court examined the charge‑sheet, the summons, and the applicant’s criminal history, noting …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 2924 of 2025 (State vs. Dharmendra Singh and others). The High Court examined the charge‑sheet, cognizance order, and the applicants’ criminal history, noting that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Non‑Bailable Section (BNSS) seeking to quash a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) dated 14‑07‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Session Trial No. 541 of 2024, relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 452, 506, 308, 336 …
The applicant, Prashant Kumar Kesharwani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, in a Section 125 CrPC case. The parties were referred to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 227 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 207 of 2024, which involved …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑12‑2024, the cognizance/summoning order dated 14‑07‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 10944 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and …
Govind Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑02‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 6536 of 2026, which alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 121(1). The applicant …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Surya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.1925 of 2026) initiated by the State of U.P. under Sections 324(4) and 318(4) of the BNS. The High Court examined the charge‑sheet and cognizance order and noted …
The applicants, Hasib Salmani and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7502 of 2025) arising out of Crime No. 237 of 2024, which involved offences under sections 85, 115(2), …
Surendra Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑11‑2011, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2011, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.341 of 2011) on the ground that he was falsely implicated and that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (Case No. 3019 of 2023) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of …
The applicant, Farhat Khan, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No.51254 of 2023) that arose from a monetary dispute with the second opposite party. The applicant alleged that the FIR and subsequent charge‑sheet under IPC sections 406, 504 and 506 …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application seeking quashing of a charge‑sheet and the cognizance order dated 01‑07‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Sahaswan, Budaun. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 221, 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS are non‑cognizable and, per the …
The applicants, Rajesh Maddheshiya and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The counsel for the opposite party had no objection to …
The applicant, Shashi Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09-02-2021, the non-bailable warrant dated 04-04-2024, and the process under Section 82 CrPC dated 10-06-2026, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 01.05.2026 in Criminal Case No. 2235 of 2026 (State vs. Garima et al.). They contended that the charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal …
The applicant, Umakant Bajpai alias Pappu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the quashing of the charge sheet (Report No. 395/2024 dated 25‑12‑2024) and the order dated 12‑06‑2026 in the pending case State vs. Umakant Bajpai (Criminal Writ No. 93995/2025). The High Court …
The applicant, Atul Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a magistrate’s order dated 13 March 2026 that treated a charge‑sheet under IPC Sections 352 and 351(3) as a State case. Pandey argued that these sections relate to non‑cognizable offences and, …
The applicant, Iqrar Ahamad Abrar Ahamad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by Advocate Javed Habib, while the State of U.P. and another party were represented by G.A. The learned counsel for the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking quash of the charge sheet, notice and inquiry order in a criminal case (State vs. Priyankesh Jain and others). They alleged that the prosecution was maliciously fabricated and that no prima …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the case State of U.P. v. Shiv Kumar (MU‑A‑274/2021). The High Court examined the FIR, charge sheet, and the orders dated 23‑03‑2022, 24‑08‑2022 and 27‑08‑2025 and found no …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the order dated 16‑08‑2024 in criminal case 12491/2024 (State vs. Qyamuddin) where charges under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 506 had been framed. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The petitioners Bhagirath and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑05‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 2137 of 2026 arising from FIR …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55616 of 2025, where the accused were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 30‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No.101633 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 24‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑03‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS. …
Mubashir and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑06‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 760 of 2026. The applicants contended that the offence under Section 351(3) BNSS is non‑cognizable and, …
Aman Tayal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 21‑05‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 30‑05‑2025 in Criminal Case No.108 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) BNS are …
The applicant, Deepu Nishad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 14‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 23‑09‑2025 in Criminal Case No.11192 of 2025. The High Court examined the FIR, charge‑sheet and the orders and found no …
The applicant, Satyendra Kumar Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 02‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 913 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 132, 351(3) and 356(3) of …
The applicant, Shiv Shankar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07.01.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11.02.2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2958 of 2025 relating to FIRs under …
The applicant, Ved Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25.05.2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06.07.2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 9523 of 2026 arising from FIR under various IPC sections. The High Court …
The applicant, Sharafat Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a non‑bailable warrant dated 03‑04‑2023 and a Section 82 CrPC process dated 13‑07‑2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar. …
The applicant, Abhishek Soni, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1048 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. The ground relied upon was the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …
The petitioners, Subhash Chandra and 11 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Anurag Kumar Goutam and Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, later informed the court that they no longer wished to press the prayer and sought to withdraw the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑05‑2024 in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race …
The applicants, Abhishek Pandey and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 01‑08‑2026 in State v. Satya Prakash Pandey, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (i.e., IPC Sections 420 and 406) along …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and related proceedings in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicants argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5548 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Bhikam Singh Kardam and others for offences under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 and 125(a) of …
The applicants, Rajat Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 71445/2023) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 545 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 335 of 2025, which involved offences under sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Sessions Trial No.286 of 2017 (State vs. Virendra Rai) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Sessions Judge on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 11728 of 2025) arising from a Section 306 IPC charge of attempted suicide. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the trial court on 03.09.2026. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19658 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 22‑09‑2026, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a conviction dated 30‑08‑2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhibramau, in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants had appealed the conviction before the Sessions Court, …
The applicant, Tej Narayan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Judicial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18‑09‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …
The applicant Ajay filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.04 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC arising from a crime in Shahzadnagar, Rampur. The parties had already reached an amicable settlement, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 44245 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 333, 115(2) and 352 BNS. A compromise verification report dated 14 September 2026 confirmed that the parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings (Case No. 547 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 323, 427, 504 and 506 IPC. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire Session Trial proceedings arising from a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 08‑01‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 320 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3012 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 76, 352 and 351(2) of the Bijnor North Special (BNS) Act. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1777 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 424 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants Ratiram and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (ST No.211 of 2014) arising from Crime No.67 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 316, 323 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered …
The applicants Kallu and others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 700 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 394 and 325 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the …
Manoj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.150 of 2026 (State vs. Manoj Kumar) that arose from a charge of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise on 20 July 2026, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. They asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1146 of 2024) arising from Case Crime No.62 of 2021, which involved multiple non‑compoundable IPC offences. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.175 of 2007 (State & Manik Singh vs. Sovran and Others) concerning an offence under Section 364 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …
The applicants, Sumit Shukla and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to set aside a charge sheet filed under IPC Section 447 for criminal trespass. They argued that, pursuant to the Uttar Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961, a written notice under the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22.08.2023 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC, alleging that a compromise had been reached and verified by the magistrate on 24.08.2026. The court noted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑06‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 18‑01‑2022 in a criminal case (Case No. 367 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 07‑10‑2024 in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The court was shown a compromise deed …
The applicant, Chandrawati Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a criminal complaint (Section 316(2) BNSS) filed against her in a criminal case arising from a dispute over Rs 1,00,000 transferred to her bank account. She alleged that the dispute was …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the Session Trial No. 514 of 2020 relating to an alleged attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323 and 504 IPC arising from a dispute in Ghaziabad. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 17518 of 2026) arising from offences under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The applicants asserted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Trial No. 797 of 2015, which stemmed from a 2013 case involving multiple IPC offences, many of which are non‑compoundable. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had …
The applicant, Gopal Choudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 30‑12‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 02‑05‑2026 in State vs Gopal Choudhary. He contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2) and 324(4) of the BNS are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 2 January 2019, the cognizance order dated 4 November 2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 106 of 2019) relating to offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 16171/9 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …
The applicants Brijpal Singh and another filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑03‑2019 in Criminal Case No.18042 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. They contended that, based on …
Saleem Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 27‑02‑2026 in Criminal Case No.13253 of 2026 (State v. Fuzail Ahmad). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly invoked …
Vikas Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑05‑2022 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑06‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 230 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 04‑09‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 26‑02‑2024 in State v Virendra et al., alleging that the offences (IPC 323, 504) are non‑cognizable. They contended that, per the explanation to Section 2(d) CrPC, a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to settle the criminal case (Case Crime No.14 of 2019) through compromise. The court noted that a compromise deed had been prepared but not yet filed. It directed the applicants to file the deed before the Additional Civil …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 01‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 14‑07‑2026 in a case arising under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. The sole contention was that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per the …
The applicant, Chandu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to settle the pending criminal case (Case Crime No.566 of 2015) with the State of U.P. Both parties had already reached a compromise, but the deed had not been presented before the court. The High …
The applicant, Paramveer, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC claiming that a compromise deed had already been executed with the State of U.P. and two other parties. The court noted that the original compromise deed had not been presented before the trial court and ordered its return …
The applicants filed an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to record a compromise in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 307, 323 and 506 IPC. The court noted that the parties had already reached a compromise but had not filed the deed before the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 15‑07‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 03 of 2023) instituted under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties agreed to refer the …
Satish Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 26‑06‑2021, the cognizance order dated 28‑07‑2021, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No.1765 of 2021 (State v. Yogesh & others) arising from a Section 406 IPC offence. The High Court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 August 2025 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia, which had rejected a compromise entered on 3 April 2025 in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, …
The applicants, Hosiyar Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 4 September 2014, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11 October 2018, and the entire proceedings of State of U.P. v. Hosiyar Singh (Case No. …
Krishna Murari filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 8‑April‑2026 in Case No. 7493 of 2026 (Crime No. 64 of 2025). The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …
The applicant, Veerampal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 25‑03‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 28‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 1164 of 2026. He contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS—are …
The applicants, Tufani Yadav and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑06‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 31‑07‑2024, and the entire proceedings in case No. 9777 of 2024 relating to offences under …
Janardan Yadav and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1 September 2025, the cognizance order dated 29 October 2025, and the entire proceedings of case 7719 of 2025, which arose from alleged offences under Sections …
Roshani Chaurasia filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 21‑09‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 10‑04‑2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Varanasi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) BNSS. The …
The applicant, Balli @ Baliram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) dated 9 May 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Basti, in a case arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 504 IPC. The …
The applicant, Adnan Shakil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 8 August 2025 that had been issued after he allegedly missed court dates despite having been granted bail. The High Court examined the record and …
The applicant, Deepak Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the magistrate’s cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2). The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑06‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026 arising from FIR under Section 352. The High Court …
The applicants, Vishvanath Pandey and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 79 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 147, 344, 347 and 506 IPC. They relied …
The applicants Sandeep Mittal and four others sought to quash a criminal proceeding (Case Crime No. 0421 of 2025) initiated under Section 316(2) BNS of the Uttar Pradesh code. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code, submitting a verified compromise report …
The applicant, Ram Ujagir Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑03‑2025, the cognizance order dated 28‑05‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No.17441 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 420, 471, 419 and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑07‑2017, the cognizance and summoning order dated 12‑04‑2019, and the entire proceedings of State Vs. Rajesh @ Tuntun (Case No. 2279 of 2019) relating to offences under …
The applicant Navdeep Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, before Justice Saurabh Srivastava, ordered that the matter be listed for hearing on 7 October 2026. No further factual or legal discussion is provided in …
The applicant, Lalchandra Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 19599 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 225 of 2025, including the charge sheet dated 23‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated …
An application under Section 528 CrPC was filed by Anil @ Bhagwati Sharan Dwivedi seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State vs Vishnu Kant (Case No. 2418 of 2019) which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 14‑07‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 388 of 2025 (State vs. Subodh Kumar and Others) arising from Crime No. 146 of 2025. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑11‑2020, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09‑12‑2020, and the entire Session proceedings (Case No. 770 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 392 and 411 IPC. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.1935 of 2024) arising from Crime No.455 of 2020, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants, Ajay Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicants, Ayyub and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 10457/22) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 336 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report confirming the settlement was filed. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑01‑2025, the cognizance order dated 13‑11‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.62 of 2025) arising from Crime No.497 of 2024. Both parties had amicably …
The applicant, Kuldeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 2718 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification …
The applicant, Anita Srivastav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified before the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 131, 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Case No. 46 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 136 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 281 and 106 (non‑compoundable). The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No.15564 of 2024, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 379, 504, 506, 427 and 384 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise that was verified by the Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7748 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an …
The applicant, Shivam Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 52096 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 281, 125A and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13‑12‑2016 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325 IPC. The court noted that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was …
The applicant Shivam filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.125 of 2021) pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Bareilly, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 325. Both parties had reached a compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 17‑05‑2008 and related proceedings (Case No.313 of 2009) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 452 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …
The applicant, Raj Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking recall of a non‑bailable warrant dated 3‑Jan‑2026 and a consequential order dated 5‑June‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Baberu, in a case arising from offences under Sections 420 and 468 IPC. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.310 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 333, 192(2), 115(2), 351(3), 110 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had already reached an amicable …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333 and 109(1) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act. The parties had reached a genuine compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicant Teja Pandey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 in State v. Teja Pandey, a case involving offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 8‑Nov‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 17‑May‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Ballia, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) BNS. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 15‑02‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 26‑05‑2026 issued by the Village Court, Tundla, in a case arising from offence under Section 351(2) BNS. The applicants contended that the offence is …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC filed by Munib Ansari and six others seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 493 of 2011 (State vs. Munib Ansari et al.) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 504 IPC. The applicants had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 706 of 2016) relating to offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑01‑2005 and related proceedings (Case No.1628 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 353, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.2911 of 2026) arising from a 2016 offence under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was recorded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on …
An application under Section 528 of the CrPC was filed by Alam and two others seeking to quash criminal case No. 975 of 2024, which arose from Crime No. 146 of 2023 and alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise verification …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55062, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 406 and 420 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance order dated 06‑08‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1054 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 281, 115 and 351 of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 08‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 09 of 2026 arising from FIR Crime No. 332 of 2025. The High Court examined the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 29‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 3258 of 2026 arising from FIR No. 597 of 2024. The High Court …
Ram Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑09‑2013, the cognizance order of 05‑05‑2015 and the non‑bailable warrant of 14‑07‑2026, along with the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.1539 of 2016) instituted …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑06‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2021 in a case pending under Sections 188 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that these offences are …
Ramesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (case no. 55514 of 2026) arising from a FIR under IPC sections 115(2), 333, 352, 351(2) and Section 110. The High Court examined the record and held that no ground existed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3185 of 2023, which involved charges under sections 323, 352, 504, 506, 427, 365, 324 and 308 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicant, Ashish Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8229 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC …
Mahendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Old Case No. 777/9 of 2020, now New Case No. 1422 of 2020) that were instituted under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 07‑03‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 16525 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 131, 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS – are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNDS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.342 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar Jain & Others). They argued that the investigating police failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.39 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar Jain & Others) on the ground that the investigating police failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.46 of 2025, alleging that the investigating police officer failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 and 30 of the Banning of …
The applicant, a senior lineman, sought to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order filed under Section 125 BNS in a case arising from an alleged electric shock injury to the complainant’s son. He contended that the victim’s injury was caused by a bent pole and a wire touching the high‑voltage line, …
The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑05‑2014 in a case under Section 354(D) IPC, alleging a 12‑year delay violating his right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution. The applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under sections 115(2), 352, 74 and 351(3) of the IPC. They claimed false implication and mala‑fide investigation. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 6 March 2026, the cognizance order dated 5 August 2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2689 of 2026) arising from FIR charges under Sections 281, 109(1) and 352 …
The applicants Ramesh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑05‑2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC. They alleged false …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated February and April 2025 in a case involving alleged offences under sections of the IPC. They alleged false implication and mala fide motives, arguing lack of evidence and …
Vinod Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 4 June 2015, the cognizance order dated 16 September 2015 and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 8100 of 2015 arising from an FIR under Section 409 of the Indian Penal …
The applicants, Sudhir and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and cognizance order dated 23 July 2026 in Criminal Case No.1464 of 2026, which arose from Crime No.459 of 2025 and alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. …
The applicant Monu Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22‑08‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑03‑2024 in a case under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that the offences are …
The applicant, Iddu Shekh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2024 and the Section 82 process in Sessions Case No.1253 of 2013, arising from offences under Sections 41, 411, 413 and 414 of the IPC before a Special …
The applicant, Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 31.10.2016 and the cognizance order dated 13.10.2017 in a criminal case under Section 507 IPC. He contended that Section 507 IPC is a non‑cognizable offence and, per the …
The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 06-11-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 03-12-2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.434 of 2025. The High Court examined the …
The applicant Pulkit filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 28‑05‑2025 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 17‑03‑2026 in Sessions Case No. 992 of 2026. The charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS, which the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑02‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 12543 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS—are non‑cognizable and …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of an application filed under Section 528 of the BNSS by the petitioner, Faim @ Shanshah. The court directed that the orders for this application be the same as those passed in the earlier application of Kalim Khan vs. State of U.P. and Another. No …
The applicant, Randhir, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04.01.2024, the summoning order dated 12.12.2024, and the entire proceedings of a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 of the IPC. He had …
Smt Geeta Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 19‑11‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 17‑03‑2026 in State v. Surendra Kumar (Case No.04 of 2009), which arose from a 2005 crime involving offences under Sections 109, 420, …
The applicants, Mahendra Pratap and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑08‑2024, the cognizance order dated 07‑04‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1441 of 2026) pending before the Special …
The applicant, Dharmendra Prasad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 13‑09‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 11‑02‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 2600 of 2025. He contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS …
Mohd. Zubair filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order filed under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS for alleged milk adulteration. He contended that the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) comprehensively covers such offences and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑02‑2011 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 23‑06‑2024 issued in Criminal Case No. 19/11, which involved offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 20‑08‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 08‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 6299 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 17‑10‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 10‑3‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate in Deoria. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 324(4) and 351(2) of the BNSS—are non‑cognizable …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 18‑Oct‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 25‑Jul‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 8728 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS—are non‑cognizable and that, under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 01‑04‑2026 issued by the Civil Judge in Shahjahanpur, which was based on a charge‑sheet filed by the investigating officer under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) BNS. The applicants contended …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 22‑12‑2025 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Jhansi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 3(5) of the BNSS. …
The applicants Deepak Gupta and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 03‑04‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 16‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 23077 of 2026, which arose from Crime No. 262 of 2025. The same dispute had earlier been …
The applicants, Akup and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2011 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑01‑2014 issued in a case arising out of NCR No.53 of 2011 under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The High Court …
The applicants, Gopal Srivastava and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 11 Oct 2025 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 21 May 2026 in a case registered under several IPC provisions (191(2), 352, 333, 115(2), …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Gram Nyayalaya, Gorakhpur, after missing court dates despite having been granted bail. The High Court examined the record and found no sufficient ground to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 2 September 2018, the cognizance and summoning order dated 23 March 2019, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 1679 of 2019 (State of U.P. vs. Pawan Gupta & others) arising …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑12‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 22‑4‑2026 issued by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Tilhar. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2) and 351(3) of …
The petitioners Vinoda Devi and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 5 August 2023 and the cognizance and summoning order dated 20 August 2025 in Criminal Case No. 345 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 548 of 2026, alleging that the offences (Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS) are non‑cognizable. The counsel argued that, per the explanation to Section 2(1)h of the …
The applicant, Manglesh Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case that alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. He contended that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …
The applicants, Jugendra and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 04‑12‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3202 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections …
The applicant, Rajnish Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 30 May 2026 issued in Criminal Case No. 470 of 2008 (sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC). The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …
