Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SAURABH SRIVASTAVA

611 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

MOHD MUSTAKEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 23‑09‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 29‑09‑2025 in a case under Section 351(2) BNSS, alleging that the offence is non‑cognizable. The applicant contended that, per the explanation to …

SATPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 11‑Nov‑2025 issued in the State of U.P. v. Satpal case. The High Court examined the record and found no ground to interfere with the warrant, thereby refusing the prayer …

KUSUMA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kusuma Devi and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 23‑03‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 27‑06‑2024 in a case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah. They contended that the charge‑sheet …

GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gaurav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑11‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑04‑2024, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.13536 of 2024, which pertained to an offence under Section 354 …

FARIDA BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑08‑2020, the cognizance and summoning order dated 15‑01‑2021, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.1307 of 2021) arising from FIR No.36 of 2020. The High …

TEJU PRAJAPATI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 28‑10‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑02‑2026 in Crime No. 136 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS are …

KAVITA RANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kavita Rani filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑01‑2026 in Criminal Case No.7534 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet …

MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohit, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 25‑07‑2025 and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 18188 of 2025 (State v. Somwati & others). The High Court examined the FIR, the …

BABULLE @ RAJPAL GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 13.08.2017 and the cognizance order dated 16.12.2017 in a case involving offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that these offences are …

KALIKA PRASAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a non‑bailable warrant dated 07‑05‑1997 that had been issued in Crime No. 322 of 1994 for offences under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The warrant was issued after the …

SUDHIR TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sudhir Tyagi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 15‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No.1554 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC. The …

RAMESH CHANDRA @ GUDDU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 09‑10‑2023 and a cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2023 in a case arising from an N.C.R. under Section 504 IPC, a non‑cognizable offence. They contended that, per the explanation to …

RAMRAJ YADAV ALIAS RAJA RAM YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramraj Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 29‑03‑2025 in Criminal Case No.202 of 2025, which was based on a charge‑sheet filed by the investigating officer under Sections 324(5) and 351(3) of …

RAMBHAGAT YADAV @ SHRIRAM YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 31‑03‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 26‑11‑2024 in State v. Ram Bhagat Yadav et al., a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506 relating to an alleged assault during …

AMAN KHAN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Aman Khan and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑09‑2024, the cognizance order dated 01‑02‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2574 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, …

BILKIS BANO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Bilkis Bano and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑Nov‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 22‑Apr‑2022 in a criminal case (Case No. 10773 of 2022) relating to alleged criminal breach of trust and intimidation. They …

ABID PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Abid Pradhan filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash an order dated 07‑08‑2026 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, in Crime No.73 of 2026 and to appear through video‑conferencing. The applicant …

UBAISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 2617 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 640 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 352, 115(2) and 351(3) of the IPC. The parties had earlier filed a writ petition and, following …

VANDANA GUPTA @ KM BANDANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vandana Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑05‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, in a complaint case registered under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The …

AMIT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Amit Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.1111 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which involved offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 of …

CHANU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12 May 2025 and the cognizance order dated 27 August 2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS. The …

DHARMVEER BHATI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Dharmveer Bhati and another, filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 26‑01‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 20‑03‑2025 in a criminal case where they were charged under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (equivalent to IPC Sections 420 and 406). …

RAMESH BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ramesh Bhati filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑09‑2023 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

FAIZALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑06‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 07‑10‑2025, and the entire proceedings in State of U.P. v. Ballu (Criminal Case No. 21291 of 2025). The High Court examined …

RAJNEESH UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.1153 of 2016 (State vs. Rajneesh Upadhyay) relating to offences under Sections 120B, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and …

RADHA KRISHNA GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 19‑06‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 08‑09‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, in a case under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicants contended that …

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Mahendra Pal Singh and seven others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 16‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑04‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 469 of 2026. They …

MAYA SHANKAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Maya Shankar Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two non‑bailable warrants dated 28‑02‑2024 and 27‑08‑2026 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Azamgarh, in a trial concerning offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The High …

NIKHIL PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 37266/2026, where the prosecution had charged them under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) BNS together. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …

GULSHAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gulshan Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 May 2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 15 July 2025, and the entire proceedings in State of U.P. v. Rahul and others. The applicant contended that the charge sheet improperly included both …

SAMIKSHA AGRAWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 01‑05‑2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.S. The …

KAPIL KUMAR @ KAPIL TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Kapil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge-sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 03.02.2023 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

UMESH KUMAR @ UMESH KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Umesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (Cr.No.319 of 2017) alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 506. He contended that he was falsely implicated as a retaliatory …

RIFAQATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑12‑2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑05‑2020, and the entire criminal proceedings in State v. Ravi Tiwari (Case No.1248 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 352 and 389 …

MOHD. YASEEN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 03.02.2026 and the entire criminal proceedings arising from non‑compoundable offences (IPC sections 318(4), 191(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 352) in Bareilly. The …

GUNJAN AWASTHI @ ANSUMAN AWASTHI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal trial (Sessions Trial No.187 of 2025) for an alleged offence under Section 306 of the IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise which was verified by the trial court. …

MUJMMIL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 3740 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …

MUKESH KUMAR AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mukesh Kumar Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No.579 of 2011 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar) relating to offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had …

GUDDA @ HARENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 06.03.2025 and related proceedings arising from a case under Sections 115(2) and 352 IPC. The applicants asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the …

MEHKAR SINGH @ MEHKAR BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mehkar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 13151 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 386, 387, 388, 389, 506, 190, 188 and 120‑B of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …

IRSHAD @ MO IRSHAD ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No.1745 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections 323, 352 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …

MAHENDRA PAL MAHENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 7172 of 2012, which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Chief …

VIPIN SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑05‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑11‑2025 in Case No. 507 of 2025, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was recorded on …

MOHD ANWAR @ ANWAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 31‑01‑2026 in State v. Anwar, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was recorded on 20‑08‑2026. The court examined whether criminal …

RAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code but subsequently expressed a desire not to pursue it. The counsel for the applicant requested that the application be treated as withdrawn, and the opposing counsel raised no objection. The court accepted the request …

VIKASH SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vikash Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 19‑09‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 25‑03‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 5709 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the …

YOGESH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Yogesh and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheets and the entire criminal trial (Sessions Trial No. 1221 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 506, 352 and 304 IPC. The applicants …

ONKARESHWAR MISHRA ALIAS KARAN AND 18 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash orders dated 14‑08‑2025 and 12‑05‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 4266 of 2025) relating to non‑compoundable offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and …

RAJKUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 10‑04‑2018 and the cognizance order dated 18‑08‑2018 in Criminal Case No.2505 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 354, 308 and 325 IPC. Both parties had amicably …

NADEEM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2497 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 110, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and that the settlement was verified …

BALWANT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the Sessions Trial No. 231 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicants had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No.232 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by …

SARANSH MANAUT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Saransh Manaut and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC. The dispute between the parties had been amicably settled, a fact verified by …

ZUBAIR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 598 of 2020, which involved offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a 2019 crime. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 28‑07‑2026 and …

AMIT BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC Sections 420 and 406). The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme …

ATAURRAHMAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09‑07‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v Ataurrahman Khan & others under Sections 352 and 351(3) BNS. They contended that these …

BHUPENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Bhupendra and others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑12‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 26‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No.84 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and …

SARASVATI DEVI @ SARASVATI KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 15‑11‑2021 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that, per the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …

SOVARAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑10‑2008, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑11‑2008, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7792 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324 and …

OM PRAKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Om Prakash Tiwari, the accused in Criminal Case No. 8662 of 2026, was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order, contending that Sections 406 (criminal …

KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and the process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC dated 05‑06‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 332, 353, 336 and 427 IPC. The …

RAJEEV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 01.08.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11.02.2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah, in a case arising from non‑cognizable offences under Sections 115(2) …

JITENDRA KUMAR RATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Jitendra Kumar Rathi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 12‑08‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 22640 of 2026. He contended that the charge‑sheet improperly included both Sections 420 and 406 of the …

SOMPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sompal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of the charge‑sheet dated 23‑03‑2026, the cognizance order dated 13‑05‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.6210 of 2026) arising from an FIR that alleged offences …

MALATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑12‑2022 in Criminal Case No.15790 of 2022, which was based on a charge‑sheet under IPC Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506. They contended that these offences …

SMT. SHYAMO YADAV @ GEETA @ SIKHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt. Shyamo Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑05‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑06‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 5314 of 2023. They contended that the charge‑sheet improperly alleged both …

DASHRATH UPADHYAY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.13521 of 2022) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which arose from Crime No.337 of 2020. They relied on a prior order dated …

KAHASHARI BEGUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Kahashari Begum, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS challenging an order dated 21 July 2026 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge) in Complaint Case No. M/326/12/2026, which rejected her earlier application. The High Court heard counsel for both …

VIPIN KUMAR HARIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 638 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjeev Kumar) which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. They contended, relying on a recent Supreme …

MURSALEEM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑11‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑07‑2026 in State v. Waseem and others, relating to offences under Sections 447, 504, 506, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian …

GOPAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gopal Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 16‑04‑2018 in Criminal Case No.6900970, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the …

SUNIL ARORAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sunil Arora filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑08‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑07‑2025 in State v. Sumti Arora, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sachin filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order in case 38659 of 2026, which was based on a charge‑sheet filed by the police for offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicant contended that these offences are …

RAHUL DILAWAR @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Dilawar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 308 IPC. He contended that he was falsely …

HARISH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Harish Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 18‑06‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 7676 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, …

DURGESH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Durgesh Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 10‑03‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 01‑06‑2026 passed by a Judicial Magistrate in Jaunpur. The applicant contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and …

KESHAV AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Keshav and 13 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 187 of 2026) arising from charges under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 121(1), 132, 125, 115(2), 352 and 3(v) of the BNS. The High Court …

PINTU CHAUHAN @ ABHAY CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pintu Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑11‑2023 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended, …

NEHA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Neha Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and charge sheet in Criminal Case No. 99192 of 2024 (State vs. Lokesh et al.) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and …

TASAVVAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7257 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 309 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had already reached an amicable …

PUSHPENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 11732 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the IPC arising from a dispute in …

IRFAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 27‑09‑2021 issued in a 2010 case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC. They argued that they had already been granted bail but failed to …

YUSUFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Yusuf, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Crime No.190 of 2016 (State of U.P. v. Yusuf) which involved charges under Sections 398 and 401 of the IPC, the charge‑sheet dated 25‑02‑2014 and a non‑bailable warrant. The High Court …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 9 January 2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11 May 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh in case no. 7675 of 2026. The contention was that the charge …

BUNTY KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bunty Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑07‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 7944 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …

AKBAR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akbar Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 16‑01‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 932 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC arising from a 2021 incident. The applicant contended, relying on …

AMBRISH SRIVASTAVA @ DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ambrish Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 8 April 2021 and the entire proceedings of case No. 95215 of 2021, which involved charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal …

ANIL KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Anil Kumar Patel filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 24‑03‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 07‑11‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, in a case arising from offences under Sections 324(4), 351(2) and 352 BNS. The …

POOJAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Pooja filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑05‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8767 of 2025 (State of U.P. v. Gulfam). The ground relied upon was that the charge sheet alleged offences …

SMT. RAJNI CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 15‑April‑2025 and the related proceedings in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS. They contended that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per the …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rohit filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge sheet dated 25‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 18‑09‑2025 passed by the Civil Judge (C.D.)/F.T.C., Jaunpur in case no. 958 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under …

RAMAKANT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29 March 2026 and the entire proceedings in State vs. Ramakant and others (Case No. 2066 of 2026). The charge sheet pertained to offences under Sections 329(3), 111(7), 352 …

SHAILENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shailendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑02‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 16 March 2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from his account to that of the opposite party. The order arose from a criminal …

PREETIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Preeti, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 16 March 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from her account to the second opposite party in a criminal case (Crime No. 221 of …

AKANKSHA CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akanksha Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS before the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 25.3.2026 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Second Hapur in Criminal Revision No. 44 of 2026. That revision arose out of Case Crime No. …

ASIF IKBAL ALIAS TAJJU AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑11‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 01‑03‑2021 in Criminal Case No. 1585 of 2021 (Crime No. 487 of 2019) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of …

AKANKSHA CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 June 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from the applicants' account to that of the second respondent. The order arose from …

MOHIT ARORA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohit Arora and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑07‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 10188 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. The parties …

SHYAM PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-11-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 16-10-2025, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 14265 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 352 …

SIRAJDHWAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 24‑12‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 02‑06‑2026 in Criminal Case No.70/IX/2026. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS—are non‑cognizable and …

ASHA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Asha and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑01‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 201 of 2026. The High Court examined the FIR, the …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑10‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑12‑2024 in a case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar. The …

JAWAHIR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 26‑12‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑05‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 158 of 2025, alleging that the offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) BNSS are non‑cognizable. They contended …

OMPRAKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑03‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑06‑2023 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that these …

PRADEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pradeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 13‑09‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …

ABHIJEET GAUTAM @ AMIT GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑04‑2026 in a criminal case that alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that Sections 406 …

RAKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 21‑06‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 13‑01‑2026 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the IPC. The High Court …

NAVEEN KUMAR BHATI ALIAS NAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 CrPC filed by Naveen Kumar seeking quashing of the cognizance and summoning order dated 30 March 2022 in State v. Naveen Kumar (Case No.1520 of 2022) arising from a crime under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The applicant contended …

SUBHASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑12‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings in State v. Subhash (Case No. 3154 of 2026). The High Court examined the FIR, the …

AMAN VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2019, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 06-02-2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 478 of 2018 under …

DAALCHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Daalchand, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑07‑2013 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 19‑02‑2014 in Crime No. 666 of 2013, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. …

KHEMAKARAN KUMAR @ NIKTEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Khemakaran Kumar alias Niketan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 13397 of 2026 relating to …

ASIF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicants submitted that the application had become infructuous and should therefore be dismissed. The opposite party did not object to this …

AKHILESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhilesh Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑11‑2017 and the accompanying order dated 20‑07‑2026, which were issued after he failed to appear despite having been released on bail in a case …

SMT MANJU DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt. Manju Devi and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 6‑Feb‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 3‑Aug‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 1998 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 285 of 2024. They …

DURGA PRASAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑03‑2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 1145 of 2026 arising from FIR under IPC sections 333, 110, 115(2), …

SMT SANGEETA RANI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Sangeeta Rani Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 10‑03‑2008 and related orders dated 24‑11‑2011 and 21‑12‑2011 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant limited her prayer …

AJEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction that all criminal cases in which he had been granted bail should be secured by a single personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two common sureties. The court queried whether the applicant had previously …

BHAGWANDEEN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Bhagwandeen and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 19290 of 2025) involving offences under sections 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 324(2) of the BNS P.S. …

VIPIN KUMAR YADAV @ VISHVA CHAND YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vipin Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 03‑12‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 20‑03‑2026 in State v. Alok Kumar Pandey (Case No. 340 of 2026). The charge sheet was filed under Section 351(2) of the BNS, which …

KRIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kripal Singh filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 5928 of 2021, alleging false implication and lack of evidence. The State opposed, contending that the issues were factual and that at the stage of taking cognizance only a prima facie case is required. The …

SANJAY SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 15665 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjay Sharma and others). The court …

MOHD ASLAM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mohd Aslam Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 31‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 09‑01‑2026 in a case registered as Crime No.239 of 2025 under Sections 354A, 354C and 509 of the IPC. The opposite party questioned …

MANOJ PANDEY @ MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons, cognizance order and chargesheet filed against them in a criminal case under Sections 291 and 352 of the BNSS. They contended that the FIR was false, based on a neighbourhood dispute, and that the …

SHANI YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashing of two criminal cases (ST No.22 of 2023 and ST No.114 of 2022) arising from Crime No.64 of 2022, which involved several non‑compoundable offences under the IPC. Both the applicants and the State admitted that they had …

YASHRAJ VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Yashraj Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑12‑2025, the cognizance order dated 12‑02‑2026 and the entire proceedings of State v Yashraj Verma (Case No. 8859 of 2026). The applicant alleged that the …

MANORANJAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manoranjan Kumar applied under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of an order that denied the release of his passport and permission to travel abroad. The applicant had deposited his passport with the police after obtaining anticipatory bail, but the trial court rejected his request for travel …

MUNNEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Munne filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27.05.2026 issued by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, in a criminal case (State Vs. Munne) under Section 129G of the BNSS. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned notice, and the …

VAISH KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vaish Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27.05.2026 issued under Section 130 of the BNSS by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, in criminal case No.33 of 2026 (State vs. Vaish Khan) under Section 129G of the BNSS. The High …

MOHD. ARBAJ KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd. Arbaj Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27‑05‑2026 issued by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, under Section 130 of the BNSS in a criminal case (State Vs. Mohd. Arbaj Khan). The High Court examined the FIR, the …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vishal, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the court's direction to accept a single personal bond and surety for six separate bail cases in which he had already been granted bail. During hearing, it was clarified that the applicant had never actually furnished …

RAJESH KUSHWAHA @ RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 03‑04‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 30‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 17818/2025 (State vs. Kali Charan). The charge‑sheet alleged offences …

NABABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1925 of 2010) on the ground of mistaken identity, invoking Section 528 of the BNSS. The High Court examined whether the petition, filed after a 16‑year delay, complied with the requirement of filing within a reasonable time. The court …

MANOJ MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 304 and 308 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …

KHANJHATI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 24‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 32 of 2026 (State of U.P. v. Khanjhati & others). The court examined …

MANISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 23 April 2026 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that rejected his request for an extension of time to file a discharge application and simultaneously framed charges in a criminal case. The applicant …

RANJEET PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ranjeet Prasad filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4 July 2024 in State vs. Ranjeet Prasad (Case No. 4650 of 2024), which charged him under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued, relying on the …

VANSHIKA KATIYAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 11‑Sept‑2025 and the cognizance order of 31‑Jan‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 474 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 0288 of 2025. They alleged that the FIR was false, filed to harass them in a …

MOHAMMAD REHAN @ REHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohammad Rehan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 336 IPC and Section 7 of …

OM PRAKASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑11‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4729 of 2023 (State v. Sushil Kumar and others) …

RIZWAN KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 19‑08‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No. 72367 of 2025 relating to alleged offences under IPC sections 271, 278, …

RABIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rabiya filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑05‑2026, and the entire proceedings in case 33831 of 2026 arising from an FIR under IPC sections 406, 504, 419 and 120B. The High Court examined …

AARTI DWIVEDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 9 January 2026 and the cognizance order dated 30 June 2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda, in a case arising from offences under Sections 352, 115(2) and 351(3) BNS. The …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The juvenile applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 01‑10‑2023, the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024, and the entire proceedings pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Shamli, relating to offences under IPC sections 147, …

AJAY PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 26‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 01‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 595 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 324(4), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS – are …

SARVANAND PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑03‑2026 in Criminal Case No.3697 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and …

KAMLESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kamlesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the charge‑sheet dated 25‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑01‑2026 in Case No. 264 of 2026 (State vs. Munni Devi). He relied on a prior application by co‑accused Ram Kumar (Application No. 24122 …

BRAJMOHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑12‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No.511 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 324(4) and 352 of the BNSS are …

VINESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought a direction under Section 528 of the CrPC for the trial court to accept a personal bail bond and two sureties in five cases where bail had already been granted. The court queried whether the applicant had previously offered such bonds and whether the trial court had specifically …

VIVEK NISHAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 01‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No.5256 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS—are …

CHHAYA NISHAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Chhaya Nishad and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑02‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 17‑06‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 33393 of 2026. They contended that the offences …

RAJIV KAPOORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajiv Kapoor, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 26‑05‑2026 in Criminal Case No.4526 of 2026. The ground relied upon was that the charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) …

AJAY KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ajay Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑Nov‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑Jan‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in State v. Ajay Kumar Shukla (Case No. 2186 of 2026). The High Court …

VIVEK SHRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vivek Shrivastav filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 29‑05‑2026 in Case No. 1454 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (i.e., IPC 420 and 406) along with other …

BADARI PRASAD GUPTA @ MAMA BROKERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Badari Prasad Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 22.11.2024 in State v. Vijay Rastogi, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race …

CHANDRABHAN SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Chandrabhan Singh Yadav, who had been granted anticipatory bail in eight criminal cases, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking a direction that the trial courts accept two common bail bonds for all those cases. The court examined whether the applicant had ever …

RAJE @ RAJARAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 10‑02‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2026 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Bijnor. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS—are non‑cognizable …

SAURABH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saurabh Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑07‑2024 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 11‑10‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 15427/2024, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The …

NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.21 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 506 and 308. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional District and Sessions Judge on 26‑05‑2026 and …

RAKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Rakesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a fresh passport. The applicant relied on a prior order dated 17 July 2025 in which interim protection for passport issuance had been extended in a related application (No. 22997 of 2025). The Union of India contended that the …

AMIT SOAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Amit Soam filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑01‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. …

RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 08‑08‑2007, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑06‑2008, the non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑04‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 5835 of 2007. The High Court examined …

VIKASH PRASHANT LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case where they were charged under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. They argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

UDAYSHANKAR TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1179 of 2010, which involved offences under Sections 143, 186, 506, 147, 148, 353 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had earlier been directed by this Court to obtain a court‑verified …

SANJEEV @ KARU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Case No. 954 of 2022, which stemmed from Crime No. 663 of 2017 involving offences under Sections 452, 307, 323, 325, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties …

BADRI PRASAD @ RINKU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Badri Prasad and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 21‑02‑2026 in a case where they were charged under sections 318(4), 316(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) BNS. The contention was that sections 318(4) and …

VIKAS KUMAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking verification of a written compromise dated 27‑08‑2026. The court noted that the parties had already entered into the compromise and that two of the parties, one a cadet in the Merchant Navy and the other …

RAM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Prakash filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7910 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 52 of 2025 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, and also requested liberty to surrender and obtain …

SANDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 12‑03‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 19‑02‑2026 in Case No. 654 2026. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 351(2), 352 and 115(2) of the BNSS – are non‑cognizable and that, under …

MUNISH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State v. Gopal (Case No. 1013 of 2017) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …

RAJESH JAIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 3261 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 147, 354, 354A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, a compromise was recorded and …

RAJARAM PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The case Rajaram Paswan v. State of U.P. & Another was filed as an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The matter was listed as a fresh application on 22 May 2026 before Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Srivastava. The counsel for the applicant was Diwas Verma and for the …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sunil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑08‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑01‑2025 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that, according to the …

PARVEJ ALIAS PARINDAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Parvej alias Parinda, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑03‑2025 issued in State of U.P. v. Aafeem (Case No.10113 of 2021) under IPC sections 379 and 411. The High Court examined the record and found …

SADHNA DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sadhna Dixit, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summoning orders in a criminal case (Case No. 4196 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that, based on the Supreme …

ASHISH KUMAR CHATURVEDI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 07‑07‑2023 in a case where they were charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club (2024) 10 …

KRISHNA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Krishna Singh and another, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 504 and 506. They contended that sections …

SHARAD SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16‑01‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC, Varanasi, which had remitted the matter back to an Executive Magistrate for fresh consideration. The applicants argued that the …

NIKHIL MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nikhil Mittar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a chargesheet and cognizance order relating to alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC arising from a land‑registration dispute. The court observed that the dispute was essentially civil, …

SURENDRA NATH RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Surendra Nath Rai, a government servant, was summoned in a criminal proceeding (Case No. 3454 of 1999) for offences under IPC sections 147, 504, 342, 323 and 306. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order on the ground that no …

AJAY PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13 March 2025 in a case pending before the ACJM Court in Deoria, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal …

SNEHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sneha filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑05‑2025 in State v. Sneha (Case No. 21522 of 2025). The applicant contended that the offences alleged – Sections 352, 115(2) and …

JAHID ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jahid Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑1‑2026, and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 461 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 269 of 2025 that alleged offences under …

SURENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 06.01.2026 passed by a Judicial Magistrate in Meerut, which had treated a case under Sections 115(2) and 351(2) BNS as a State case. They argued that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per …

ASHOK KUMAR SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑April‑2015 and the cognizance order dated 22‑May‑2015 in State v. Ashok Kumar Seth (Case No. 5851/2015), which arose from FIR No. 125/2015 alleging …

ASHOK KUMAR SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Seth, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 25 May 2015 and a cognizance order dated 9 June 2015 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in criminal case No. 446/2019 relating to …

GULAFSHA ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gulafsha Ansari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 22‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No.23346 of 202. The applicant contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(3) of the BNS—are …

KAPTAN SINGH AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kaptan Singh and eleven others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑10‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑02‑2022, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 5209 of 2024 relating to offences under …

MOHD RAHILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Rahil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections. He alleged false implication, claiming the investigation was improper and …

SANJAY KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Sonkar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 2571 of 2019) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 406 of the Indian Penal …

AMIT @ TENIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order, bailable warrant and non‑bailable warrant dated 4 March 2025 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat, in S.S.T. No. 82 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. …

PHOOL KUMARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑12‑2025, which had directed them to stand trial for offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS. They contended that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per …

SHALINI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 39 of 2026 (State v. Hemant & others). The High Court …

TUSHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Tushar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 27‑09‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 03‑12‑2022 in State v. Ajay Goswami (Case No. 27644 of 2022), which alleged offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of …

PUSHPENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pushpendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order dated March 2023 in a case involving alleged offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant alleged false …

NAVED ANWAR KHAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 12‑10‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑12‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 342 of 2026 arising from FIR No. 413 of 2025. The High Court …

SATISH KUMAR GOYAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking correction of a mis‑transcribed section and to challenge the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and related proceedings in Case No. 3848 of 2026 (State vs. Moon Goyal et al.) arising from Crime No. 255 of 2025. The contention was …

AJAY SINHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ajay Sinha and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑02‑2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, and the entire proceeding in State v. Ajay Sinha (Case No. 3005 of 2026) arising from offences under …