Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
611 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 26‑12‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑02‑2026, and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 10345 of 2026) alleging false implication and lack of prima facie …
The applicant sought to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and that the investigating officer had not properly inquired before filing the charge sheet. The State opposed the …
Ranvijay Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 39085 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 406, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicant, Hari Narayan Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 3372 of 2018) initiated by the State of U.P. The case involved charges under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that …
Devanand Goswami filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7‑8‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 15‑9‑2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 3rd, Prayagraj in case 443 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under Sections 352 …
The applicants, Avdhesh Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, sought permission to withdraw the application, citing that the trial court had already proceeded to frame …
The applicant, Smt. Madhu, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS challenging an order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, which had rejected her application. The High Court noted a preliminary objection raised by the learned Additional Government …
The applicant, Ajay Shekhar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30‑04‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case arising from a 1999 FIR under IPC sections 457, 411 and 380. The High Court examined the …
The applicants Subhash Kumar, Ram Kripal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quash of a chargesheet dated 18‑04‑2024, the cognizance order dated 08‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Subhash Kumar (Case No. 652 of 2025) …
The applicants Murari Lal and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 08.01.2025 and a cognizance order dated 01.05.2025 in Crime No. 320 of 2024. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 61(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of the …
The applicants, Praneeta and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑01‑2026 in State vs Praneeta et al. (Case No. 84 of 2026). They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 115(2), …
The applicant, Lucky, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking a direction that the trial courts allow a single surety bond for four separate criminal cases, relying on a Supreme Court decision in Hani Nishad v. State of U.P. The State opposed the prayer. The court noted that the …
The applicants Roshan Lal and others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 08‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 28‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3534 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06-10-2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20-12-2024, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 7225 of 2024 (State vs. Arvind Yadav and others) relating to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of State vs. Ramprakash Yadav (Case No.4732 of 2020) involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act. The High Court examined the FIR, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 28.05.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04.11.2025, and the entire proceedings in State v. Jagdeesh and others (Case No. 156601 of 2025). The court examined the …
Ranjeet Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 02.05.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05.08.2025 in Criminal Case No. 5226 of 2025, where he was charged under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
Smt. Chitrarekha filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑03‑2024 issued in State v. Sunita (Case No.01 of 2007). She limited her prayer to obtaining a direction that, if she surrenders within three weeks and applies for …
The applicants, Furqan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 23772 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 193 of 2022 alleging offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The High Court examined the FIR, …
The applicants, Zeeshan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order dated 13‑11‑2025 that rejected their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 325 and 308 IPC. They alleged false implication, collusion …
The applicant, Umesh Chandra Yadav, sought to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case where he was implicated under Section 447 IPC for criminal trespass. He argued that the U.P. Amendment Act, 1961 makes prior written notice under the amended Section 441 IPC mandatory before a …
The applicants, Sukha and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 28‑11‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 23‑03‑2026 in State vs Sukha (Case No. 229 of 2026). They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 324(4), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑11‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 48 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 110, 118(1), …
The applicants, Arun Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑03‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 2014 of 2026 (State v. Vikas et al.) …
The applicants, Smt Rashmi Saxena and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 29‑04‑2025 in Criminal Case No.1394 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07-08-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05-02-2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2451 of 2026 arising from FIR containing offences under various IPC …
The applicant, Pankaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09.12.2024 in Criminal Case No.18513 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 420, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 …
The applicant, Jay Bahadur Singh Sengar, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑01‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that, following the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.11908 of 2025) arising from FIR and chargesheet under various IPC sections. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order, the chargesheet and …
The applicant, Vikas Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑08‑2024 in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 10‑10‑2025, a summoning order dated 07‑06‑2024, and the entire proceedings of case No.1064 of 2022 (State of U.P. v. Ajay Sharma) under Section 354 IPC. The High Court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑08‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 10796 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The applicant Shakuntala filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 7784 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 351(3) and 352 BNS. The contention was that Sections 318(4) and 316(2) …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑08‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 10795 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to challenge an order dated 21‑08‑2024 of the Special Judge (Anti‑Corruption), Meerut, which had taken cognizance of an offence. The High Court heard numerous adjournments and complied with a direction of the …
The applicant, Naim Khan, a government servant, was summoned to trial in a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506 without the mandatory prior sanction required under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the …
The applicant, Madhoo Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case alleging extortion, criminal conspiracy and intimidation under IPC sections 386, 120B and 506. The applicant alleged false implication …
The applicant, Arvind Singh Chandel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court (BNSS No. 11577 of 2026). During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Puneet Kumar, informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the …
The petitioners, Mohan Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of Criminal Case No. 48807 of 2025 (State vs. Brijesh Pandey @ Lalbabu and Others). They argued that the FIR lacked corroborative evidence, the injury report did not …
An application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Har Prasad and seven others against the State of U.P. and another party. The counsel for the applicants, Ganesh Shanker Srivastava and Vinod Kumar Maurya, did not appear before the court even after a revised call. …
The applicant Guddu filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑11‑2019, the cognizance order dated 30‑01‑2021, and the entire proceedings of Case No.84 of 2021 (State vs. Satyendra Singh and others) relating to a theft offence …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 26‑09‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 30‑10‑2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 and 109 of the IPC. The High Court examined …
The applicant, Heeralal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v. Heeralal (Case No. 114 of 2026) relating to offences under …
The applicant, Rajeev Kumar @ Raju, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even after a revised call. The court noted the …
The applicant, who was the informant in a fraud case involving forged lease deeds to claim agricultural insurance, sought to quash a fresh cognizance order dated 23.03.2026 that omitted Section 420 IPC. The order had been issued by the Civil Judge (SD) at Chhata, Mathura after a prior order was set …
The applicants Kaliyan and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 16‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 1210 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 513 of 2024 and alleged offences under Sections 115(2), …
Man Bahadur Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 14‑12‑2021 and a subsequent order dated 17‑09‑2025 in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 419, 406, 420, 506 and 120B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 …
The applicant, Vidya Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 01‑01‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 2901 of 2026. She contended that the offences alleged – Section 352 and Section 351(2) of the BNS – are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet, cognizance and summoning orders in a case where they were charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 507 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot be …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the chargesheet dated 21‑12‑2021, the cognizance and summoning order dated 14‑01‑2022, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 14‑11‑2022, along with the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 49 of 2022 …
The applicant, Tanuj, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11‑02‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 90 of 2025 (State vs. Tanuj) arising from an FIR under Section …
The applicant, Pankaj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑05‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 29‑09‑2025 in State v. Pankaj Singh. He contended that the offences alleged – Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS – are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 14‑04‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 30‑07‑2025 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. The sole argument advanced was that these offences are …
The applicants, Mohd Mohsin and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑06‑2022 and a cognizance order dated 17‑12‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 and 308 of the Indian Penal …
The applicants, Smt Rekha and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 21600 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 IPC. They contended, relying on a Supreme …
The applicants, Viabhav Mishra and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The opposing party's counsel …
The applicants, Ajay Tiwari and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 25‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 26‑11‑2025 in State v. Ajay Tiwari. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 221, 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS are …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 12.12.2025 in Criminal Case No.605 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 319(2), 318(4) and 316(2) BNS. The applicant contended that Sections 318(4) and 316(2) …
The applicant, Anil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 13-07-2001, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24-07-2002, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 08-02-2006 in Criminal Case No. 9247 of 2001 (State vs. Anil …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 05‑04‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑07‑2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Court No.9, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Case No.98612 of 2025. The charge‑sheet …
The applicant, Ramapati, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 4267 of 2025 (State vs. Ramchandra) arising from FIR No. 145 of 2024. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the chargesheet …
The applicant, Shivam Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑05‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 01‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 1957 of 2026. The High Court examined the record …
The applicants, Lavi Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 06‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑06‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 297 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 36 of 2025. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order dated 31‑01‑2026 in State v. Amit Jadvani, alleging that the charge of criminal breach of trust (Section 316(2) BNS, equivalent to IPC 406) and cheating (Section 318(4) BNS, …
The applicant, Santosh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 14‑02‑2024 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 22‑02‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 3250 of 2024, which alleged offences including cheating (Sec. 420 IPC) and criminal breach …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 25‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑12‑2025, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 1366 of 2025 arising from FIR No. 657 of 2023. The High Court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑10‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑06‑2025 in a case alleging offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 03‑07‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑09‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 6862 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) …
The applicant, Abhishek, who had previously been released on bail, failed to appear before the Special Judge (POCSO) and a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 07‑02‑2026 was issued against him in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 and 304 IPC. He filed an application under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 05‑02‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 03‑01‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 411, 413 and 414 IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the investigating officer had not conducted a …
The applicant, Vivek Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 24‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 41045 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and …
Shanky Anand filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 24‑03‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No.30 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 108 and 351(2) BNS. He contended that he was falsely …
The applicants, Md Rizwan Khan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the chargesheet dated 28‑09‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 18‑11‑2019 in a case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur. They alleged that they were …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 12‑08‑2025 and a summons order dated 24‑12‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The sole contention …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 9 February 2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 18 September 2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 45720 of 2025 arising from a crime under …
The applicant, Shakuntala, filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 01‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 7783 of 2025 (State vs. Lavkush). The chargesheet alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(3) …
The applicants, Manoj Kumar Taumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25.03.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28.07.2025 in Criminal Case No.5593 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 506, 406 and 420 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 19-04-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 680 of 2024 (State vs. Naresh Soni). The Court examined the FIR, the …
The applicants, Chandrapal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑07‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑12‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 25924 of 2025 arising from …
An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Somlata and three others seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 02‑06‑2019 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3394 of 2019) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 506. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 9466 of 2023, where they were charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …
Raghvendra Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the proceedings in Case No. 391 of 2025, which were based on a charge sheet invoking Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal …
Ankit Kohli filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 22070 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kohli). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly included both sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS, which correspond to IPC …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑12‑2023 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State v. Rampal (Case No. 635 of 2024) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot …
The applicant, Prashant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and charge sheet in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant argued that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …
The applicant Subhpreet filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 30 July 2022 in a case where he was charged under IPC Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …
The applicant sought to quash the order dated 01‑07‑2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 319 CrPC to summon a third accused, Harikesh, who had not been charge‑sheeted. The matter arose from an NCR filed in 2009 involving offences …
The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 18‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 13‑01‑2025 issued by the Additional Civil Judge/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau. He contended that the offences …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of Session Trial No. 88 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a court‑verified compromise, which they did, and the …
The case titled Atul Mathur and Another versus State of U.P. and Another was filed as an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, bearing BNSS No. 14903 of 2026, before Justice Saurabh Srivastava of the Allahabad High Court. The applicants were represented by counsel Rakesh …
The applicant Farooq Ahmad filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑April‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 12‑June‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and …
The applicant, Varsha Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 03.11.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate/Assistant Police Commissioner under Section 130 of the BNSS, as well as the entire proceeding of case no. 1140 of 2025 under Sections 126/135 …
The applicant, Rahul Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order and the charge‑sheet in State v. Jyoti Yadav (Case No. 6164 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant …
The applicant, Akshat Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 24‑02‑2024 and the summoning order dated 17‑01‑2024 in a Session Trial under Section 307 IPC. The applicant argued that a discharge application he had …
The applicant, Moin, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1877 of 2019) initiated by the State against Dinesh and others under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 411 IPC. The sole ground was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
The applicants, Sundaram Pandey and 19 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 30‑09‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑11‑2023 in State v. Sundaram Pandey (Case No. 1875 of 2023) which involved offences under several IPC …
The petitioners, Sanjay Jaiswal and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1‑3‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 3‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Sanjay Jaiswal (Case No. 1054 of 2025) …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7‑8‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑2‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v. Mohan Lal and others (Case No. 864 of 2026). The court examined the FIR, …
Birbal Ram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 July 2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21 October 2023, and a non‑bailable warrant dated 26 February 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, as well …
The applicant, Ashish Kesarwani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 9 October 2025 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur, in a case under Section 379 IPC. The High Court examined the record and found no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑02‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 59 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the BNSS. They contended that these …
Shailesh Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings of case no. 29226 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot be invoked …
The applicants, Smt Rajbala and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 27‑08‑2021 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in a criminal case (State v. Dinesh Kumar). They explained that …
Varun Sangwan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 9 February 2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 351(3) BNS. The applicant contended that the charge …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑11‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, alleging false implication and mala‑fide motives. The magistrate had taken cognizance based on a prima facie view of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑04‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 01‑07‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. They alleged false implication, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 01‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 14‑11‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Bansi, Siddharth Nagar. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 131, 351(3) and 352 of the BNS – …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 January 2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 23 July 2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 790 of 2025 arising from offences under Sections 147, 283, 341, …
Rafuddeen filed an application under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction seeking to quash the order dated 25‑02‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO) which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application for further cross‑examination of prosecution witnesses …
The retired District Judge Tariq Manzoor Khan, who had filed the original FIR in a case involving sections 467, 468, 420 and 120B IPC, was summoned as a prosecution witness by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. Khan, now 75 and residing in Pune, argued that the original FIR was not …
The applicant, Shani Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 25‑08‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑02‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 31 of 2026) arising from FIR under Sections 106(1) and 281 of the …
The applicants, Rajesh Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑8‑2025 and the charge‑sheet dated 18‑5‑2025 in State v. Rajesh Sharma (case 24124/2025). They contended that the charge‑sheet …
The applicant, Chhotelal Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the order rejecting his discharge application in a case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 IPC. The applicant …
Mithilesh Kumari filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2025 in State of U.P. v. Mithilesh Kumari (Case No. 11889 of 2025). The applicant argued that the charge sheet improperly invoked both Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC …
The applicant, Durgesh Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 13010 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the IPC. The sole ground raised was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
The applicant, Chandra Churn Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a non‑bailable warrant issued in Criminal Case No. 1650 of 2003, relating to offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the …
Pooran Chand Virat filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 3 October 2025 and the charge sheet in State vs. Pooran Chand Virat (Case No. 91924 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 …
The applicants, Shesh Narayan Tiwari and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 04‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 30‑07‑2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 223 of 2024) relating to …
The applicants Vipul and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 1‑12‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 22‑4‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, in a case arising from offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 05‑07‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 07‑08‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 19149/2023, which alleged offences under Sections 380, 447, 448, 504 and 506 IPC. The sole ground raised was that the …
Vinay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 6‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 1‑10‑2024 in State vs. Akhilesh Yadav (Case No. 23786 of 2024). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly alleged offences under Sections …
The applicants, Yusuf and five others, were charged under Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 489 (robbery) of the IPC for an alleged offence in Saharanpur. They filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order, contending that Section 447 cannot be …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑03‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 23‑05‑2024 in Case No. 21861, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 448 IPC. Their sole contention was that the charge‑sheet under …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) under Section 145(1) CrPC, which directed both parties to maintain status quo over a disputed property. The applicant argued …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑09‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 20‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 95505 of 2025. They contended that offences under Sections 351(2) and 352 of the BNSS are non‑cognizable and that, under …
The applicant, Km Upma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order. The opposing party's counsel raised a preliminary objection, contending that the applicant had an alternative remedy of filing a revision and that the application was not maintainable. …
The applicants, Yunus and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of a non‑bailable warrant dated 21‑04‑2025 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge‑II, Jaunpur, in a case arising from offences under various IPC sections. The applicants …
Vivek Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 01‑10‑2025 in State vs Vivek Sharma (Case No. 56118/2025). He contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 351(1) and 352 of the BNSS—are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21.08.2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 19.12.2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS. They contended that these offences …
Vimla Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑12‑2024 in State vs. Vimla Devi, wherein she was charged under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
The applicant, Parikshit Parse, filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 892 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 236 of 2024 and charge‑sheeted under sections 111, 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of the chargesheet dated 10‑02‑2026, the cognizance order dated 27‑02‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 358 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 126(2), 131, 118(1), …
The applicants, Ramchandra Rai and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 07‑01‑2019 and a subsequent order dated 30‑03‑2026 in State v. Ramchandar case, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑06‑2025 in State v. Vijay Kumar Maurya (Case No. 2125 of 2025). The chargesheet alleged offences under Sections 419, …
The applicant, Ram Chandar Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2026 issued in Criminal Case No.6568 of 2007 (State vs. Radhey Shyam) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 13-10-2024 and the cognizance order dated 30-01-2025 in State v. Rupesh, which involved offences under Sections 110 and 352 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08.12.2025 and to stay the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 931 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 69 of 2025 under Sections 324(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. They alleged false implication …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 13‑09‑2024 and 11‑12‑2025 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The applicant filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order in Case No. 40763 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of Uttar …
The applicant, Mohd Asif, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to amend the prayer clause of his earlier application because the cognizance order dated 06‑06‑2025 was inadvertently omitted. He prayed to quash both the chargesheet dated 01‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑12‑2024, the cognizance order dated 20‑12‑2024, and the entire Session Trial No.433 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 351, 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307, alleging that the parties had reached an amicable compromise verified by the magistrate. Both sides admitted the …
The applicants Lakhan Singh and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 20 of 2020 (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) on the ground that they had entered into a fresh compromise deed dated 9 April 2026, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 05.10.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17.10.2025, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.805 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 74 …
The applicants, Vinod Kumar Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No.569 of 2016, which arose from a 2015 offence under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed that they had reconciled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7388 of 2025, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 115(2), 131, 333 and 351(2) of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a …
Ankur Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑05‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑01‑2026 in State v. Taslim Bi and another, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme …
An application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed by Amar Singh and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another. The petitioners were represented by counsel Ajay Dubey and the respondents by G.A. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Srivastava. …
An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vishwanath and four others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicants, Beerendra Singh Pal and Manoj Kumar Keshari, appeared before the bench, while G.A. represented the opposite party. The learned …
The applicant, Asma @ Sahila, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a certified copy of the entire order sheet. The applicant requested a two‑week period to obtain and file the certified copy. The court examined whether it could exercise its discretion to …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑02‑2025 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 05‑12‑2025 in State v Kunwar Jyotiraditya Yadav, where the accused were charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 504 and 506. The applicants contended, relying on a …
The applicant, Nagendra Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 IPC arising from Crime No. 68 of 2020. The applicant argued that Sections 420 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑02‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 27‑02‑2024 in Criminal Case No.1122 of 2024, arising from offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had already reached an …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑04‑2010 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 15‑05‑2010 in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
Surjeet Varma filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑11‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club (2024) 10 SCC 690, …
The applicant, Ranveer Singh, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑01‑2020 in State v Ranveer Singh, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The applicant argued that, based …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 01‑02‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑10‑2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 907 of 2024 (State vs. Susheela Devi @ Kazri and others) relating to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑10‑2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑12‑2019, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.702 of 2022 relating to offences under Sections 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No.126 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. Both parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No. 127 of 2014 (State vs Laxmi Kant Mishra et al.) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 427, 351 …
The applicant, Chhote Lal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑06‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 25‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No.15299 of 2025. The charge‑sheet alleged offences …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 127(2) of the IPC. They argued that they were falsely implicated, the injury report was …
The applicants Kallu and four others filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 6059 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 0088/2024 under IPC sections 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506. They contended that the cognizance order dated 1 July 2024 was issued before the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑11‑2025 in Crime No. 454 of 2024, alleging that the FIR and charge‑sheet did not warrant interference. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order …
The applicants, Ashok and eight others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 09‑04‑2025 in State v. Sandeep Kumar (Case No. 946 of 2025) relating to offences under various IPC sections. …
Sunita and three others filed an application under Section 91 of the BNSS seeking to quash a March 20, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, which had rejected their bail‑bond request in a criminal case involving offences under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 308. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 732 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 307, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated to further a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet and summoning order in a criminal case, alleging false implication, absence of their names in the FIR, and lack of material evidence. The State opposed, arguing that the matter involved disputed facts …
The applicant, Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the Court's interference in a matter pending since 2005. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed that the …
The applicants Amit @ Amardeep and another filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 1 July 2025, the cognizance/summoning order dated 15 December 2025 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 51215 of 2025) pending before the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 20‑10‑2015, the cognizance order dated 25‑05‑2016, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.1267 of 2016) for offences under Sections 147, 109, 295 and 504 IPC. The parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 22.03.2022, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20.06.2023, and the entire proceedings in Case No.17910 of 2023 relating to offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. …
The applicant, Parul Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.20389 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.463 of 2022) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur. She relied on a prior judgment …
Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑01‑2023 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …
The applicant, Girja Shankar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order and all proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 898 of 2025, arising from a 2012 FIR and a charge‑sheet filed in 2025. He argued that the more‑than‑13‑year delay in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 24‑04‑2018 and related criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 325 and 308 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional Civil …
The applicants, Sudhakar and four others, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.1518 of 2025) arising from FIR No.282 of 2024 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 191(2) of the BNS Act. They contended that the FIR …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18.05.2018 and related criminal proceedings (Case No.7641 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.21 of 2017 (State vs. Iqbal and others), which involved offences under Sections 406, 452, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑09‑2025 in State v. Nizam & others (Case No. 6678 of 2025), which involved offences under Sections 74, 352, 115(2), 126(2), 131 and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 319 of 2010) relating to offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
Ram Kumar filed an FIR alleging that his son Ankit Srivastav was assaulted. The charge‑sheet filed by the police omitted Ankit as a witness. Ram Kumar applied to the magistrate for further investigation under Sec. 173(8)/193(3) CrPC, but the magistrate rejected the application twice, first on the …
The applicants, Saurabh Sonkar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 9‑December‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 3‑March‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 14315 of 2023, arising from FIR Crime No. 369 of 2019 under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 13598/9 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified on …
The applicants challenged the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State v. Shobh Nath et al.) alleging false implication and undue delay in filing the FIR. They argued that the alleged offence occurred on 14‑06‑2020 but the FIR was lodged on 17‑08‑2020, and that the injury was …
The applicants, Rubi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 13.05.2025 and a cognizance order dated 04.10.2025 in State v. Saroj. They contended that the offence under Section 115(2) BNSS is non‑cognizable and, per the explanation to …
The applicant, Akanksha Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑09‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑05‑2025 in a case filed under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The sole contention was that the offences are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528/482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 23.11.2020 and the entire criminal case (Case No. 2430 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 452, …
The applicants Shivam Yadav, Ajeet Yadav and Jagdish Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Case No. 502 of 2025, alleging that they were falsely implicated and that the FIR contained no specific …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a supplementary chargesheet dated 05‑11‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 5201 of 2023. The charges were originally framed against co‑accused after an FIR, but the Superintendent of Police …
Rev. Fr. Vineet Vincent Pereira filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Section 295A IPC for allegedly insulting Hindu religious sentiments during a prayer meeting. The applicant contended that the investigation …
