Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SONI SHRIVASTAVA

1027 judgments · newest first · showing 601–800

UDIT KHARWAR @ UDIT KUMAR KHARWARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

Petitioner Udit Kharwar filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender period granted in the order dated 21-07-2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.76061 of 2024. The application relied on grounds set out in paragraph 4, requesting an additional two weeks from the date of …

Vivek Thakur @ Vivek Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vivek Thakur, filed an application seeking anticipatory bail in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. Earlier, on 02‑07‑2025, the Patna High Court had dismissed his anticipatory bail application on the ground of non‑prosecution. The petitioner then filed a fresh anticipatory bail …

Ritu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ritu Kumar and Gunnu Patel, filed an application seeking modification of the order dated 14‑11‑2025 in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 913 of 2025, specifically to extend the period allowed for surrender in the Motihari SC/ST case. The High Court considered the petitioner's request and the …

Manikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manikant Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 25(1‑AA) and 26 of the Arms Act. Charges were framed on 26‑11‑2025, and the petitioner, who has been in custody since 21‑03‑2025 and has no prior criminal record, …

Ajay Mishra @ Ajay Kumar Mishra @ Ampu MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Mishra, filed a fresh bail application after his earlier bail request was mistakenly withdrawn due to a miscommunication by a proxy of his former counsel. The withdrawal was intended only for two co‑accused, not for Mishra himself, leading to an unintended dismissal of his bail …

RICHA THAKUR @ RICHAversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

In Criminal Miscellaneous No.26120 of 2023, petitioners Richa Thakur and Kumar Rituraj filed an application arising from PS Case No.836 of 2019 before the Patna High Court. The respondents were the State of Bihar and Laxmi Thakur. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Shashikant, prayed for the …

KOMAL NIKHILESH ANANDversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, relatives of Komal Nikhilesh Anand, were accused in a complaint by Akhilesh Anand of demanding Rs 25 lakh, threatening, and stealing jewellery and cash from his house. The petitioners contended that the complaint was a retaliatory, malicious prosecution arising from a 498A case …

Kulbansh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Kulbansh Singh and Ramswarath Singh were convicted under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at villagers over a dispute involving goats. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of several injured relatives of the victims and a medical …

Ajay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner filed an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code on 4 July 2018 seeking to file additional documents to rebut documentary evidence produced by the accused. The trial court had rejected this application on 20 February 2023, a decision the petitioner challenged, …

RAVI RANJAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, was acquitted by the trial court in a criminal matter. He subsequently filed an application before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought permission to withdraw that application on the ground of the acquittal. The Court examined whether such a withdrawal could be …

Pawan Kumar Gupta @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar Gupta filed a fresh anticipatory bail application after having withdrawn an earlier one on 30‑06‑2025. He claimed new grounds, namely the completion of investigation, filing of charge‑sheet and a marriage agreement dated 08‑06‑2019. The Patna High Court examined whether these …

Md. Ansar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Ansar Ali, filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 11 August 2025 that prescribed a surrender period in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The application requested an extension of the surrender period by two weeks, conditioned upon the deposit of …

SHISHUPAL SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Shishupal Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner failed to appear on the scheduled dates of 10‑11‑2025, 03‑02‑2026 and again on 05‑02‑2026 despite repeated calls. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State’s …

SHWETA SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Shweta Singh filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (Criminal Misc. No.10494 of 2023) seeking to challenge a subsequent development in the case against the State of Bihar and Vishal Raj. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Ashok Kumar, argued for the continuation of the …

SUSHMA PANDEYversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are in-laws of the informant, sought quashing of the order dated 14‑09‑2020 that took cognizance of FIR No. 160/2020 under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The informant alleged cruelty, dowry demands and harassment by the petitioners, …

KRANTI KUMAR MISHRAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The widow Kumari Arunima alleged that her in‑law relatives subjected her to cruelty, dowry demands, theft and physical abuse during her marriage, leading to a FIR and cognizance under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The petitioners, who are her in‑laws, …

SANJAY YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, filed an application seeking cancellation of bail that had been granted to accused No.2, Deepak Kumar, on 19 January 2021. The court had earlier given the petitioner's counsel a three‑week peremptory period to rectify procedural defects, but no steps were taken and no …

HANSLAL KUMAR @ HANSLAL PRASADversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, four individuals from Bahapar village, filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Jay Mala Devi. The petitioners sought to withdraw the application so that they could present their arguments at the appropriate stage of charge framing, provided …

ANJU KUMARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Anju Kumari filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail granted to Jainath Mahto on 17 December 2021. The court gave the petitioner's counsel a two‑week peremptory deadline to rectify procedural defects, but no steps were taken and no counsel appeared. The State's counsel was present, but …

Sajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar, filed an application seeking bail before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the application in order to surrender and subsequently apply for regular bail. The Court, after hearing arguments, allowed the withdrawal and …

Harishankar Prasad @ Harishankar Prasad ShrivastavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harishankar Prasad, a 70‑year‑old deed writer from Gopalganj, faced two coercive processes under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He filed an application for anticipatory bail but later sought to withdraw it and instead surrender to obtain regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel …

Indal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Indal Yadav and others, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for alleged assault on an informant. They contended that the FIR was lodged 15 days after the incident without any reasonable …

Sonu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that she, along with others, entered the informant’s land, abused, assaulted, and attempted to outrage the informant’s modesty. She contended that she is the rightful landowner and the case was fabricated to facilitate a land …

Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Buxar Town PS Case No.416 of 2025) involving alleged impersonation in a constable recruitment exam. The FIR named sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 341(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, but did not name the …

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, filed an application seeking to withdraw his earlier plea so that he could surrender and apply for regular bail. The learned counsel requested that the withdrawal be permitted. The High Court allowed the prayer, disposing of the application as withdrawn. The court …

Balaveshwar Kewat @ Baleshwar KevatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Balaveshwar Kewat sought bail after being named in a FIR for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and theft. The FIR alleged that he and others assaulted an informant and stole jewellery, but the petitioner argued that no specific overt act was attributed to him and …

Ramhridya BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ramhridya Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case arising from a dispute over water falling on his roof, which allegedly led to assault and multiple injuries. The FIR alleges offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and grievous hurt. …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunita Devi and Ganit Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR under multiple sections of the B.N.S for an assault arising from a dispute between children. The FIR primarily implicates co‑accused Nitesh Sahni and his wife Manita, with the petitioners being accused only due to …

Ashok ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Ashok Choudhary, Kabutari Devi and Rekha Devi – who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 109(1) and 80 of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that the deceased …

Chinta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five residents of Barhani Ke Tola, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No.445 of 2025) filed under several sections of the B.N.S, 2023 relating to assault and related offences. The FIR alleged a scuffle over a land dispute, naming ten accused, …

Mina Devi @ Nirmala Devi @ Mira DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 85, 123 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging dowry demand, cruelty and administration of poison. They contended …

Kunal Kumar @ Kunal YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of relatives from Usri Tola Beldari, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging they assaulted an informant and his family under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The FIR described a violent incident involving twelve accused and unknown …

Sudhir Mukhiya @ Sudhir Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS Madhepur Case No.150 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 308(2) and 308(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR claimed that Mukhiya and others extorted …

Nirmala KulapattiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nirmala Kulapatti, wife of co-accused Raushan Kumar Jha, applied for anticipatory bail in a cyber‑crime case where the FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and the Information Technology Act. The FIR named ten persons, but the only link …

Rajan Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar@ Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a government servant, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 69 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (B.N.S). The FIR claimed that the petitioner and the informant had discussed marriage six months earlier, and after the …

Md. KalamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are neighbours, sought bail fearing arrest on charges of assault and outraging modesty under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that they assaulted the informant, but the petitioners contended that the case stemmed from an earlier …

Md. Jahangir Ansari @ Jahangir AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Jahangir Ansari, was facing criminal proceedings under PS case No.859 of 2022 in Araria. He had filed an application seeking bail. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested to withdraw the application in order to surrender and later seek regular bail. The Court …

Manoranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoranjan Kumar, chairman of Mathai PACS, was arrested in a case alleging misappropriation of paddy procured under the Bihar State Food Corporation scheme and charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The prosecution claimed that only part of the procured paddy was supplied to the …

Jainarayan PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, seven residents of Pantoka village, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging that fifteen persons, including them, assaulted the informant's family during a dispute over food served at a shradh ceremony. The petitioners argued that the FIR shows only …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akash Kumar and Ankit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and attempted murder. They argued that the allegations were largely general, that no pistol was fired and thus no intention …

Hasnain Roy @ AfrojversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Hasnain Roy, a scrap dealer, sought anticipatory bail after the police recovered iron pipes from his shop, alleging they were stolen property under Sections 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He contended that he had no knowledge of the theft and had been operating the shop for …

Mustari BegamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mustari Begam, feared arrest for alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120B relating to alleged irregularities in Panchayat scheme implementation and construction of a Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan. The FIR, lodged in 2025, concerns an incident that occurred …

Khushi Sharma @ Khushi Kumari @ Khushi Kumari SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Khushi Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case (Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S.) where the victim's daughter was allegedly abducted. The FIR alleges a conspiracy involving several accused, but the petitioner’s alleged role was limited to calling the …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prince Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the FIR alleged that he, along with others, was armed and assaulted the son of an informant, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The petitioner's counsel argued that the primary assault was attributed to …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Muffasil P.S. Case No. 370 of 2025) under several sections of the B.N.S. Act for allegedly forcing entry into an informant's house and assaulting family members. He contended that the FIR was false, motivated …

Lal Mohammad Miyan @ Lal Mohammad AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Lal Mohammad Miyan, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 105 of 2025) under Sections 190, 191(2) and 191(3) of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier, a withdrawal petition had been filed and subsequently withdrawn before the Additional …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, where the FIR alleged that he and a group of persons assaulted an informant’s mother and villagers. Counsel argued that the FIR contains only general and …

RANJAY SINGH @ RANJAY KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ranjay Singh and Arbaj Gaddi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleging that the FIR was lodged thirteen days after the alleged incident and that the death of the informant's father was not supported …

Ganesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ganesh Kumar and Nathuni Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, entered the informant's house armed, assaulted the informant and her mother‑in‑law, and caused injuries. The …

Prachi Chaurasiya @ Prachi Raj @ PrachiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prachi Chaurasiya, a former employee of Shanti Niketan Academy School, was implicated in a FIR alleging misappropriation of Rs.30,000 and charged under sections 316(2), 318(4), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023. She had resigned from her job on 15‑02‑2025, …

Bharti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four women related to Jai Prakash Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged mob violence against a police informant. The FIR alleged that Jai Prakash Chouhan, a military …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar sought bail in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging theft of a golden chain, a motorcycle and cash. The FIR does not name him; his name appears only in the confessional statement of co‑accused Akash Choudhary, which the petitioner argued …

Sigheshwar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sigheshwar Rai, was named among thirteen accused in a case arising from a dispute over the construction of a grocery shop, alleged to have involved verbal abuse and assault with a bottle causing a simple injury to Saurabh Kumar. He contended that he was implicated solely because of …

MURSHID ALAMversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, comprising the husband, his wife, and two daughters, filed an application to quash the order dated 14 September 2020 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, which had taken cognizance against them under IPC sections 504, 506, 498A/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They …

SACHCHIDA NAND LALL @ SACHITANAND LAL SAHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, a group of relatives from Banhara village, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash the FIR and challenge the order taking cognizance and issuing summons in PS‑Teghra Case No. 40 of 2021. On 3 February 2026, counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Mariya Nazir, …

UMENDAR BASFOR @ UPENDRA DOMversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Umendar Basfor filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1360 of 2022 before the Patna High Court, seeking relief against the State of Bihar and several respondents. After hearing, the petitioner requested to withdraw the application, stating that the impugned order of 12-04-2021 had merely …

RAJESH KUMAR SINGH @ RAJESH SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar and Bhanu Pratap Singh. He sought to withdraw the pending proceedings so that he could present his arguments at the appropriate stage of charge framing by filing a discharge application. The learned …

RAM JANAM PRASADversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant, filed an application under Section 239 of the CrPC for discharge, which was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate. They sought quashing of that order, contending that a compromise had been reached between the complainant (now a …

ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR BHAGATversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the complainant, sought quashing of criminal proceedings instituted under IPC Sections 323 and 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged dowry demand and torture, but during anticipatory bail …

ASHOK YADAV @ ASHOK KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 05‑06‑2023 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, which had taken cognizance and issued process against them under several IPC provisions and the Arms Act. The facts allege that a mob of about twenty‑one persons …

SARDAR MAHENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The Patna High Court clarified that the appellant in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.117 of 2003 is Mahendra Singh, son of the late Tara Singh, not Sardar Mahendra Singh, son of Sardar Manna Singh. The appellant’s death was established by a Superintendent of Police report dated 31‑11‑2017, which recorded …

Baleshwar RayversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner filed an application in 2019 seeking cancellation of bail. Over several dates, the petitioner's counsel repeatedly failed to appear or sought adjournments, and by the latest order on 29.01.2026 no one had pressed the application. The court again listed the matter for 02.02.2026, but …

USHA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, sought cancellation of the regular bail granted to accused No.2 in a kidnapping case involving the informant's son, who disappeared on 10‑08‑2020 amid a property dispute. The High Court examined the FIR and the bail order, noting that the investigation had produced only …

RAM NANDAN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ram Nandan Singh, sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Satya Prakash (opposite party no.2) in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case involving Rs.29 lakh. The petitioner argued that the bail order treated the dispute as civil and that the accused had …

RAMJI PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Ramji Prasad filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing despite repeated notices on 08-12-2025 and 29-01-2026. The State, represented by Advocate Anil Kumar Singh, was present. The court observed that the petitioner had …

VINAY SHARMAversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner, Vinay Sharma, filed an application in the Patna High Court but failed to appear for hearings despite repeated notices on 02-02-2026, 08-12-2025, and 29-01-2026. The State's counsel, Ashok Kumar Singh, was present throughout. The court observed that the petitioner had apparently lost …

VIKASH YADAV @ VIKASH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner filed an application seeking the court's permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, requested that the court allow the withdrawal. The court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw. …

RAMESHWAR CHOUDHARY and ORSversusSTATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The appellants Suresh, Heera and Sevalal Choudhary were convicted for assaulting Yogeshwar Dhanuk with a fasuli, resulting in multiple injuries, under IPC sections 326 and 307/34. The prosecution relied on six eye‑witnesses, an injured witness, a medical doctor’s report and the investigating …

VIJAY KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Kumar Singh, a builder, entered into a development agreement with landowner Surendra Kumar Singh and was later accused of fraud, leading to an FIR under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The parties subsequently reached a voluntary compromise, filing a joint affidavit stating that …

RANI GUPTA @ KUWAR RANI GUPTAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – the mother‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the complainant – filed an application to quash the order dated 10‑Oct‑2022 that took cognizance against them under Sections 341, 323, 354, 427, 498A, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

MANKI DEVI @ MOST. MANKI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manki Devi filed an application seeking cancellation of bail that had been granted to accused No.2‑5 by the District and Sessions Judge, Madhubani, alleging that supervening threats were being made against her and her family. The petition was filed before the Patna High Court. The Court examined …

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Sanjay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, filed an application seeking modification of an earlier order that set a deadline for his surrender in a criminal miscellaneous case. He claimed that a communication gap prevented him from surrendering within the prescribed time. The court considered the petitioner's …

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pintu Yadav, sought modification of a bail order dated 26.03.2025 which required verification of his criminal antecedent before release. He argued that a pending case (Fatehpur (Gurpa O.P.) P.S. Case No. 43 of 2020) had resulted in a final report declaring him innocent and a …

Khushboo ParweenversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Khushboo Parween, filed an application seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Akram Khan (Opposite Party No.2) in a case involving offences under IPC sections 302, 307, 326, 120B, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The grounds alleged were that the accused had threatened the …

UMASHANKAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Umashankar Singh, filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to Vishwas Mali (Opposite Party No.2) on 06-12-2023. The petitioner alleged that Mali obtained bail by misrepresenting that no incriminating property had been recovered, whereas the case diary showed …

JEEVAN KUMAR VERMA @ JEEVAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Jeevan Kumar Verma filed a petition in the Patna High Court arising from a 2015 criminal case. During the proceedings, the petitioner filed an application, which later became moot due to a compromise between the parties. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the application on the ground that …

PAWAN RAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pawan Ram sought cancellation of the regular bail granted to Jata Shankar Lal Das (opposite party No.2) in a case involving theft of Rs.10,000 and assault, alleging that the bail order misrepresented the accused’s criminal antecedent. The High Court examined the facts, noting that the …

Lal Babu Mahto @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Babu Mahto, was charged under IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act Sections 4 and 6 for allegedly raping a woman in her house. After being in custody since August 2024, his earlier bail plea was rejected, but he was permitted to renew the …

Dharmavir Kumar @ Dharamvir Yadav @ Dharamveer YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmavir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault case (PS Case No. 333 of 2024) and charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023. He had previously applied for bail, which was denied on 22‑08‑2025. He filed a fresh application …

POOJA DEVI @ PUJA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Pooja Devi filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.36343 of 2021 before the Patna High Court. The petitioner sought relief in the matter arising from a 2017 complaint case. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, subsequently prayed for the withdrawal of the application. The court …

Narad Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Narad Prasad Singh, sought cancellation of the regular bail granted to the accused, Pritam Kumar Singh, by the District and Additional Sessions Judge. The petitioner alleged that Singh had brutally assaulted the informant's son and that the bail order ignored direct allegations of …

VIJAY SHREEversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vijay Shree, the wife, filed an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to her husband, Gajendra Singh, in a criminal case under Section 498A of the IPC. The petitioner argued that the bail was granted without sufficient notice to her and that subsequent threatening conduct …

SUJIT PANJIYAR @SUJIT KRISHNA @MONUversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the same family, filed criminal complaints against each other under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 arising from a property dispute. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance in three separate cases, but no charges had been framed and the parties …

Satish Kumar BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Satish Kumar Bhagat and Qmare Alam were convicted under Section 395 IPC for a dacoity based primarily on a delayed test identification parade (T.I.P.) and the informant’s fardbeyan. The High Court examined the reliability of the FIR, the credibility of witnesses, the absence of the …

AMRITA KUMARIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner, Amrita Kumari, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar and Anil Kumar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates of 04-12-2025 and 22-01-2026. The matter was listed in the interest of justice, but the …

SAROJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Petitioner Saroj Kumar filed an application in the Patna High Court in criminal miscellaneous case No.41065 of 2022. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates of 04-12-2025 and 27-01-2026 despite the matter being listed in the interest of justice. The court noted the …

PANKAJ KUMAR PANJIYARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the same family, filed criminal complaints against each other under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 arising from a property dispute. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance in three separate cases, but no charges had been framed and the parties …

CHANDRA PRABHA KUMARIversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Chandra Prabha Kumari filed an application before the Patna High Court. The application was presented by counsel Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh. During the hearing, the petitioner, through senior counsel, sought to withdraw the application. The Court allowed the prayer for withdrawal. …

UDAY SHANKAR PANDEYversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Uday Shankar Pandey filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.52349 of 2022 before the Patna High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Gajendra Nath Ojha, prayed for the withdrawal of the application. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the …

Shyamkuri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner sought cancellation of the regular bail granted to Raushan Patel (Opposite Party No.2) in a case arising from FIR No.459/2023, arguing that a similarly situated co-accused, Mukesh Kumar, had been denied bail and that Patel's withdrawal and re‑filing of bail applications demonstrated …

RAMPUKARI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the same family, filed criminal complaints against each other under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 arising from a property dispute. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance in three separate cases, but no charges had been framed and the parties …

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar SahversusThe State Of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Raushan Kumar filed an application seeking withdrawal of the pending criminal miscellaneous proceeding. Counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Om Prakash Om, prayed that the application be withdrawn. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No substantive merits …

UPENDRA YADAV @ UPENDRA KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Upendra Yadav, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. During the hearing on 29‑01‑2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, stating that the stage of the case had changed. The court considered the request and granted …

LALBHADUR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Lalbhadur Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief, but no counsel appeared on his behalf. The State of Bihar and the second opposite party, Ramkewal Singh, were represented. Counsel for the second opposite party informed the Court that the trial had reached the final …

Puja Kumai @ Puja KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three family members of a co-accused, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging assault on an informant's husband under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The FIR, filed four days after the incident, specifically implicated Satyendra …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that he and other accused assaulted an informant and her mother‑in‑law, causing simple injuries, arising from a neighbourly dispute over drainage. The FIR invoked Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 109, 329(3) and 352 of the …

Amlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amlesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he and co‑accused Ashish Kumar entered Kabir Math with illegal arms, committed verbal abuse, …

Sunil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are relatives of the informant, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) relating to alleged fraud in a land partition. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s mother had executed a …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Santosh Yadav, Ramdhayan Yadav and Vishnu Yadav, were implicated in an FIR (Amba PS Case No.150 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming the incident arose from a sudden scuffle over …

Prabhakar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Prabhakar Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Khaira PS No.253 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant with an iron rod. The FIR lists multiple offences under the B.N.S, 2023, but counsel argued the incident stemmed from a domestic dispute between relatives, …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 399, 402/34 and Arms Act sections 26, 35, 25(1‑B)a after four accused persons were seized with firearms. The petitioner argued that his name appeared only because the arrested accused disclosed it, that …

Akhtari KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akhtari Khatoon and her sons, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No.29 of 2024) registered under IPC sections 457, 380 and 34. The FIR was based solely on the testimony of a neighbour, Ekram Alam, who claimed to have seen the accused fleeing, and …

Md. Azad @ Md. RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Azad and Md. Jamir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they were part of an unlawful mob that fired on an informant, but the specific charge …

Baikunth PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Baikunth Pandey, Chandrawati Devi and Ram Daso Devi – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Dinara Police Station Case No. 261 of 2025, which alleged that they, along with others, entered an informant’s house armed and assaulted the informant and his wife, …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Petitioners Suraj Kumar and Ranjit Jha were arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on an informant. The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application, but later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail for Ranjit Jha and surrender to obtain …

Ram Ashish SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, nine male relatives from Alawal Chak, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34. The FIR alleged that they entered the informant’s house, abused and assaulted her family, causing injuries. The petitioners contended …

Munna Yadav @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Munna Yadav and others, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 74, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The FIR alleged that they assaulted the informant’s daughter‑in‑law in a scuffle arising from a dispute, causing only simple …

Bhim Kumar ChouhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bhim Kumar Chouhan (Mukhiya) and Ramjiwan Yadav, were accused of selling two water tanks that were part of the Chief Minister’s Nal Jal Yojana after the tanks were damaged in a storm. An FIR filed by a ward‑member informant alleged theft, abuse and threat, invoking Sections 303(2) …

Md. SakibversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sakib, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 117(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The FIR alleged that a mob of 30‑40 persons assaulted the informant’s family, naming the petitioner among …

Raja Kumar Yadav @ Raju Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a police‑station altercation alleged in FIR No. 330 of 2025. He claimed that only four persons were arrested at the scene and that his name was disclosed solely by the co‑accused, making his alleged flight from the …

Dilip Giri @ Dilip Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dilip Giri and Suresh Giri, were implicated in a case alleging theft of 20 litres of diesel from a standing truck, alleged under Sections 317(5), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. They contended that the diesel was purchased for agricultural purposes and that it was recovered near the …

Chhatiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four women who are family members of co‑accused in a murder case, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest under a FIR that alleged assault with an iron rod leading to death. The FIR specifically implicated co‑accused Gulshan Kumar and Vakil Mandal for assault, while the …

Ammu Kumar @ Adarsh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ammu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for allegedly stealing a golden chain and cash by threatening the informant. The FIR contained general and omnibus allegations, but the …

Vinod HembramversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vinod Hembram and Bhikhari Hembram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) relating to illegal liquor manufacturing and an alleged attack on police. The FIR alleged that 15 named and 25‑30 unknown …

Ranjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (PS Case No. 975 of 2022) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to fraudulent sale deeds. The FIR alleged that co‑accused executed six sale deeds …

Safi Alam @ Sheikh Safi AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Safi Alam applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). He contended that the FIR was malicious, citing a time discrepancy in the report and the absence of any warrant against him, noting …

Nagendra Nath @ Nagendra Nath SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged they refused to register land in the informant’s name and to return Rs 2 lakh, invoking Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. They contended that no agreement existed with them, that …

Akhilesh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five residents of Mainatand village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.96 of 2025 filed under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They contended that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of 24 days and that a …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar and Ashok Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that a driver attempted to cause an accident while fleeing from an informant who …

Ekta SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ekta Sinha sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that she sold a piece of land while a partition suit was pending, invoking sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4), 61(2) and 308(4) of the B.N.S. The petitioner contended that the land was joint family property and that she acquired title …

Chhotu NutversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Chhotu Nut, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, the petitioner was arrested. He then moved the Court seeking to withdraw the application on the ground that it had become infructuous. The Court, after hearing …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he kidnapped a 17‑year‑old girl for the purpose of marriage. The FIR invoked sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the same Act indicated …

CHANDRAKISHORE CHAUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandrakishore Chaudhary and Shashi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a motorbike collision that escalated into an assault, with charges under several IPC sections. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant's brother with an iron rod, causing …

Narendra Kumar @ Nakesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Narendra Kumar (alias Nakesh Yadav), sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in illegal sand mining and storage, with offences under IPC sections 379 and 411, the MM(DR) Act 1957 section 22 and the B.M. Rule 2021 section 56. He argued that his name …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in a case alleging that he enticed a minor girl, the informant’s daughter, and later married her. The FIR listed offences under Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and later added Section 8 of the POCSO …

Nandu Singh @ Nandu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nandu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 304 and Arms Act section 27, where the FIR alleged he ordered an attack that resulted in firing and a bomb explosion. He contended that the investigation report cleared him, no …

Ram Parvesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five brothers, were charged in Barahiya P.S. Case No.139 of 2022 under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 504 and 34 for alleged assault, with the first petitioner, Ram Parvesh Singh, specifically accused of attacking an informant with an axe. An anticipatory bail application was filed for …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving theft, forgery and common intention (IPC §§ 379, 414, 467, 468, 471, 34). The FIR alleged that a stolen vehicle was recovered and two persons were arrested; the petitioner’s name was mentioned …

Manoj Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, nine relatives involved in a land dispute, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging that fifteen persons, including them, came armed to an informant's house and that co‑accused Santosh Mahto assaulted the informant. The petitioners contended that the FIR contains …

Dharmendra TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Tiwari, was arrested in a case alleging sexual assault and attempted disrobing of the informant's daughter under Sections 64(1), 62, 115(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the victim’s father is his brother and that the …

Akash Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akash Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging kidnapping of a woman for marriage, under sections 137(2), 308(3), 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023. He argued that the FIR was lodged with an inordinate delay (the incident …

MANINDRA NATH PANDEYversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant, filed an application to quash a criminal case (Mahila P.S. Case No. 141 of 2021) pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑1st Class, Patna, for offences under Sections 498A and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

Tuntun Ray @ Tuntun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Tuntun Ray, filed an application in the High Court of Patna in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 12018 of 2025 arising from PS Case No. 249 of 2024. The application was made against the State of Bihar and two co‑accused, Pappu Ray and Shivnath Ray. During the hearing on 27‑01‑2026, counsel …

ASHOK KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISPOSED

The petition filed by Ashok Kumar Singh sought the withdrawal of an application after the accused had appeared in the trial, but highlighted that the case, originating in 2019, still had no charge sheet framed. The trial court had been delayed due to an application under Section 227 of the Criminal …

Manoj KumarversusVinod Kahar @ Vinod Kumar Chandel

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to Vinod Kahar (Opposite Party No.1) on the grounds that the latter had suppressed facts about his three criminal antecedents, including a conviction, and had threatened the informant and his family. The petitioner alleged that …

AURANGZEB @ MD. AURANGZEBversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Md. Aurangzeb filed a petition to quash the order dated 25 March 2022 of the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dalsinghsarai, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code against him. The petition raised the question of whether the court could examine …

ANKIT KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

Ankit Kumar Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the pendency, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, moved that the application be withdrawn because the trial had progressed to an advanced stage. The court considered the request …

Alpana KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Alpana Kumari, filed an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to her father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law in a criminal case under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The bail had been ordered on 19‑09‑2023 by the …

Javed Alam @ Zabeed AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Javed Alam, sought the cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in 2016 to three co‑accused (Nos. 2‑4) in a criminal matter. He alleged that after the bail order the accused were involved in further altercations, leading to two later cases (Kochadhaman PS Case No. 31 of 2015 and No. …

LALAN KUMAR @ LALAN KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The petitioner, Lalan Kumar, filed an application in the Patna High Court arising from a criminal miscellaneous case (No.13431 of 2022) concerning an incident in Begusarai. The State of Bihar and a co-accused, Abhishek Kumar, were opposite parties. Despite multiple notices dated 04-12-2025 and …

ALOK RATANversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners Alok Ratan, Vandana Devi and Dr. A.R. Yadav filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from a 2016 complaint case. Their counsel, Ms. Shakshi Deep, sought to withdraw the application, citing the advanced stage of the main case and a report on its status. The …

ABDUL SATTARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Abdul Sattar, Minhaz Ahmad, and Baby Yasmin, filed an application in the High Court of Patna concerning a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2019 complaint. During the course of the trial, the petitioners sought the court's permission to withdraw the application, stating …

ASHOK YADAV @ ASHOK KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, a group of five individuals, filed an application before the Patna High Court. They later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw that application, stating it had become infructuous. The State of Bihar, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the …

SANJAY KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it, claiming the application had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanoj Kumar, requested the withdrawal. The court, after …

Vijay Kumar SinghversusThe Union of India

DISMISSED

The petitioner, a retired railway employee, challenged the reduction of his basic salary from Rs.66,000 to Rs.64,100 made in February 2022, alleging that the reduction violated principles of natural justice and was not justified under Railway Board Circular RBE No.33/2016 and Rule 13 of the CCS (RP) …

RAMESH CHANDRA PASWAN @ RAMESH KUMAR PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 17-08-2022 of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, which had rejected their discharge petition under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The State opposed, submitting that the trial was already at an advanced …

RAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Raj Kumar, husband of Usha Kumari, filed an application to quash the order dated 06-06-2022 in which the Chief Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance under Section 498A of the IPC and issued summons against him. He contended that the alleged demand for dowry was actually a business …

Ishita SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ishita Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 91428 of 2025. The matter arose from a police case and involved the State of Bihar and several respondents. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Roushan Sinha, informed the court that the dispute had been settled …

Ranjeet Thakur @ Ranjeet Kumar Thakur @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ranjeet Thakur and Sanjeet Thakur, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging that they had pressured the deceased to commit suicide for money and land. The FIR, filed five days after the …

Guli Yadav @ Sanjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Guli Yadav and his wife Kaushalaya Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023. Petitioner's counsel withdrew the anticipatory bail request for Guli Yadav to surrender and seek regular bail, while seeking anticipatory …

Abhishek AnandversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Anand, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry cruelty and an illicit relationship. He contended that the allegations were false, the marriage occurred on 1 December 2021, and the complaint was filed in 2022 after …

Md. Alam Hashmi @ Md. AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Md. Alam Hashmi sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S., alleging fraudulent sale of land and cheating. The prosecution’s FIR claimed the petitioner defrauded the informant of money. The parties later resolved the dispute through a mediation …

Md. MolajimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Molajim, was arrested in a case involving alleged dowry harassment under Sections 498(A), 379 and 34 of the IPC. He had an outstanding maintenance liability of Rs.2,34,000, of which Rs.1,00,000 had been paid and the balance of Rs.1,34,000 was promised to be paid in equal …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the kidnapping of a 17‑year‑old girl, an offence punishable under sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the POCSO Act. The FIR was filed two days after the alleged incident and …

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sangam YaduvanshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner kidnapped the minor son of the informant, while the petitioner contended that the case was false …

Md. AlauddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Alauddin, caretaker of a madarsa, feared arrest in a case under Sections 25(1B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a gun was recovered from the madarsa premises during a police raid. He contended that the weapon was not in his conscious possession, the seizure was conducted without …

Ramdeo Prasad @ Ramdev PrasadversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramdeo Prasad applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in assaulting the informant and his family, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The FIR named 13 members of the same family, and the specific allegation …

Dasai PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dasai Paswan was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and torture of his wife, Sarita Devi. The petitioner denied the allegations and submitted an undertaking to keep his wife with …

Vikas KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Vikas Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 448 of 2025). The State of Bihar opposed the application. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request, dismissing …

Santosh SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Sah and his wife Poonam Devi were named in an FIR alleging assault and related offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). They contended that the FIR was filed 20 days after the alleged incident, that the case stemmed from a personal dispute between …

Birendra Yadav @ Virendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Birendra Yadav and Ashok Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. 2023 relating to assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered the informant’s house, used abusive language and inflicted injuries, with …

Tuntun Kumar @ Tuntun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tuntun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged three days after an alleged assault on a neighbour over a drain dispute, resulting in non‑grievous injuries. The FIR listed offences under several IPC sections, but the petitioner argued the delay in filing and the …

Md. Kurban @ Md. Kurban Ali @ Md. Qurban AliversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged smuggling of fake Indian currency and a mob assault on S.S.B. personnel. Petitioners 1 and 3 withdrew their applications, leaving only Md. Azad (petitioner 2) to pursue relief. The prosecution alleged that a large mob, including …

Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Yadav petitioned for bail in a case registered under Section 96/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging kidnapping of a minor. The FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated she had eloped with Nilesy …

Umesh Sharma @ Jaldhar @ Umesh dasversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Umesh Sharma and Raghunath Pandey, were implicated in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly duping people by promising jobs through a fake Bal Bari Center. Petitioners sought bail, arguing that the FIR names only …

Sunila Sinha @ Sunil SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunila Sinha, a former teacher, was accused of forging certificates to obtain her appointment and faced charges under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. She had already been terminated from service and claimed no prior criminal record. The State opposed her bail application. The Court …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monu Kumar was accused of eloping with the 17‑year‑old daughter of an informant, leading to an FIR under Sections 96, 137(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the incident, the victim was actually 17½‑18 years old and the relationship was …

Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, manager of a primary agricultural credit society, was implicated in a case alleging embezzlement of 844.50 quintals of paddy worth Rs.18,64,656. He contended that he did not partake in the misappropriation and that the alleged amount, with interest, had already been …

Chhotelal DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Chhotelal Dubey, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act alleged a bomb explosion at his residence. He claimed he was not present at the time and that the house, usually locked, could have been accessed by a third party. The State …

Prabhu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Prabhu Chaudhary filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking relief, likely bail, in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. After hearing both parties, the Court granted the request and dismissed the application …

Udgar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Udgar Yadav sought relief from arrest in a case filed under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the charges of dowry‑related torture were false and stemmed from a love marriage. He contended that he was willing to provide a monthly allowance of Rs.6,500 to …

Vikash Mishra @ Vikash Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Mishra was named in an FIR alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a girl, alleged to be 17 years old, under Sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and several provisions of the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she went with the …

Md. Jabbar @ Md. ZabbarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard bail applications of Md. Abbas and Md. Jabbar, accused in a police‑station case involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The FIR was based on a police officer’s statement that a girl had been …

Anil Kumar Sao @ Anil Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Anil Kumar Sao, the petitioner, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police station case in Gaya. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, later requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, …

Rambabu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six individuals from Rusulpur Osti, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S.) relating to assault and other offences. The prosecution alleged that ten accused entered the informant’s house and assaulted him …

Om Prakash Rajak @ Golu @ GolooversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Rajak, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 96, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act concerning the alleged kidnapping of a minor. The FIR initially named only Rahul Mandal as the accused, …

Md. AbbasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md Abbas and Md Jabbar, were implicated in a police case (PS No 218/2025, Forbesganj) alleging involvement in flesh‑trade offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The FIR was based on the …

Pawan Sah @ Pawan SahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pawan Sah and Tej Narayan Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 74, 303(2) and 109(1)/3(5) of the B.N.S.S, alleging they entered the informant's house and assaulted her son. The FIR was lodged four days after the …

Jyoti Prakash SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jyoti Prakash Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint alleging dowry harassment under Sections 323 and 498A IPC. He denied the allegations and asserted his willingness to restore conjugal rights, having also filed a restitution of conjugal rights suit …

Aman Kumar @ AmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 137 and 96 of the B.N.S., alleging that he had kidnapped a minor girl and called her for marriage. The petitioner contended that he never spoke to the girl, who was later found at a relative’s house in …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a family of four, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging that they assaulted an informant during a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were armed and caused injuries, but the petitioners argued that the …

Sneha Kumari Barnawal @ Sneha BarnawalaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are sisters and a relative of the main accused in a land‑sale dispute, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under several IPC sections alleging fraud, assault and homicide. They contended that their signatures were taken merely as co‑sharers of the property and …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Kumar was accused of taking and selling an informant’s motorcycle, alleged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged ten days after the informant’s enquiry, and the motorcycle was later seized in an excise case where the informant’s husband was an accused. The …

Dinesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Sahani, was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly misappropriating Rs. 3 lakh received for a land purchase. He contended that the amount was actually a repayment he had earlier given to the informant, making the dispute essentially civil. The petitioner had …

Dharmendra Kumar Yadav @ Dharmendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Dharmendra Kumar Yadav and Baharan Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S.S for allegedly assaulting the informant’s nephews with a “Daab”. The FIR alleged simple injuries, and the petitioners submitted medical reports …

Parvati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Parvati Devi, Bikau Raut and Sonu Bhagat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., alleging they had assaulted the informant and others. The FIR alleged that they were armed and caused injuries, but the medical report showed …

Nand Kishore YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Tandwa village, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they were likely to be arrested in a case registered under Sections 8(b), 18 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged opium cultivation on 18.3 acres of forest land. They contended that the FIR was filed …

Md. Jawed @ Jawed AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jawed Ansari, was implicated in a theft case under Sections 379 and 34 of the IPC after an e‑rickshaw was allegedly stolen. He argued that the FIR was lodged a day after the incident, the recovered vehicle was found in an open tin shed accessible to all, and that personal enmity …

Salo SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six members of the Sharma family, sought bail in a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging they entered the informant's house armed and assaulted him. They contended that the FIR, lodged nine days after the incident, …

SUMAN SINGH @ SUMAN KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Suman Singh and Bhim Sharma Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Kalyanpur Case No.272 of 2025) where the FIR alleged assault and other offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S.S. The petitioner, a 60‑year‑old senior citizen, was alleged only to have given orders …

Pankaj SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pankaj Sah, was charged under multiple sections of the IPC for allegedly entering the informant's house, abusing and assaulting the informant and his husband, and causing a simple injury with the butt of a pistol. The informant's husband later died, but the death was attributed to …

Nanda RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Nanda Ray filed an application before the Patna High Court, presumably seeking bail, against the State of Bihar. During the hearing on 21-01-2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request, ordering the application to be dismissed as …