Created by Fuzzy Cloud

TARUN SAXENA

280 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

PRATEEK JAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Prateek Jain and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑01‑2025 under Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Mark Act, 1999 and Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, and also a mandamus directing the release of seized goods. The …

ANUPAM AGRAHARI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10‑03‑2026 (Crime No. 0056 of 2026) under Sections 87 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest or harass them. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, …

SUSHIL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 10673 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The Coordinate Bench had earlier ordered the petitioners to deposit Rs 25,000 by 26 May 2025. The petitioners failed to make the deposit and did not appear for the revised call. The …

DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Deepak Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioner failed to appear, even after the list was revised. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the State respondents. Since there was no …

DEVENDRA KUMAR VAJPEIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 11673 of 2025) was filed by Devendra Kumar Vajpei against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the court even after the list was revised, while the respondent's counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of the …

RAJUDEEN @ RAJU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. The Court had earlier ordered them to deposit Rs 20,000 with the Mediation Centre, but they failed to comply. Despite this non‑compliance, the petitioners continued to enjoy the benefits of an interim order. …

SMT. MANJU SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 11542 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed and a revised call was made, but none of the petitioners appeared before the court. The learned Additional …

RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners at the revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State respondents. The court noted the absence of petitioners' …

VED YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ved Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioner’s counsel, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, failed to appear even after the list was revised. The respondent State of U.P. and others were represented by counsel …

SHABAB KHAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shabab Khan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, and the State Law Officer representing the respondents raised no objection. The Court …

RAM SAWARE @ NARESH KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Saware @ Naresh Kumar Pandey and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 12519 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition listed counsel K.K. Rao and Pradeep Kumar Srinette for the petitioners and G.A. for the …

DEV MOHAN KHANNA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing, even after the list was revised. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the State respondents. Since the petitioners did not prosecute the petition, the …

ABHISHEK SINGH BHADAURIYAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhishek Singh Bhadauriya, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13011 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of UP and two others. The petition was listed and subsequently revised, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the …

SMT MISLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt Misla Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07.06.2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest her. The petition listed several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the court, …

AMBESH PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Ambesh Pratap Singh and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13355 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. …

RAJNI SHARMA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13142 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioners appeared before the court even after the list was revised, while the learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State was present. The court held that the …

INDRA MOHAN GAUTAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the bench. The State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners' counsel and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …

SMT KHUSHBU AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Khushbu and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑06‑2025 under sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners did not appear …

GAJJI YADAV @ GAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24-04-2026 alleging his involvement in the death of Malu Ram Yadav and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest. The FIR, filed under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the B.N.S.S., alleged that the deceased had entered the petitioner’s …

DEV SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dev Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15891 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …

NEERAJ PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The petitioner, Neeraj Pathak, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16007 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. On behalf of the petitioner, counsel Rajrshi Gupta and Rizwan Ahamad prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Advocate General (A.G.A.) raised no …

NIGAM RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Nigam Rai filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15064 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, senior counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner may pursue other remedies. The State of U.P. and another respondent …

ADARSH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Adarsh Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15901 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the Court. The State's Additional …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Vinod Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner did not appear before the Court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court held that the petition …

SMT. TABASSUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Tabassum filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Crime No. 50 of 2026 under sections 333, 64(1), 89 of the CrPC and section 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner argued that the …

GAURAV SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Gaurav Srivastava filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16513 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioner, Akash Kumar Verma, was expected to appear but failed to …

DHEERAJ KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dheeraj Kumar Sonkar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was the only party present. …

DHARMRAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmraj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 16808 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court, while the State and other respondents were represented. The court observed that the petitioner failed to …

RAJNISH KUMAR @ TIPU RAM (MINOR)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajnish Kumar (a minor) filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (i) a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S., (ii) a writ of mandamus directing the police not to arrest the second petitioner, and (iii) a writ of mandamus …

RUKHSAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rukhsar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the Court to address the matter, although the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court examined the lack of prosecution of …

HARIKESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Harikesh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking (i) a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 01‑02‑2026 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S 2023 and sections 3/4 of the DP Act, and (ii) a writ of …

AJEET KUMAR BIND AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State. During hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State's Attorney General raised no objection to this …

RAJAN YADAV ALIAS ANKIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajan Yadav alias Ankit and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑06‑2026 (Case Crime No. 109 of 2026) under Sections 87 and 61(2) of the BNS, and a writ of mandamus directing the State …

RAJESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajesh Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 30‑06‑2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been settled by a compromise deed verified by the Civil Judge. The State and other …

GAURAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 29.07.2026 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest petitioner No.1. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the statutory investigation was completed and the …

SALONI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Saloni and another filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR dated 24.07.2026 under Section 87 of BNS and a mandamus to prevent their arrest. The State, represented by the learned AGA, informed the court that the statutory investigation was completed and the investigating …

SYED ASAD ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Syed Asad Ali and others filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 21 July 2026 and a mandamus to restrain the State from arresting them. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State’s Additional …

SUKHVINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sukhvinder Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 27 July 2026 and a mandamus directing the release of his two-wheeler (Regn. No. U.K. 06-BK-6735) held at a police station. After arguments, the …

SMT INDUMATI DUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 4‑September‑2026 and to restrain the police from any coercive action, also praying that the police follow the Supreme Court’s arrest guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits of the petition but …

ISMAIL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ismail and six others filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under multiple criminal provisions, seeking its quash and mandamus to prevent their arrest and any coercive action. The petition also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down …

AMARDEEP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

Amardeep and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25 July 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act, and seeking a mandamus to prevent their arrest. The petitioners also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court’s …

ARSHAD MIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arshad Miyan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 244 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2) and 352 of BNS‑2023 (corresponding to IPC sections 341, 323 and 504) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner also made an …

DHARMENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23463 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Chandra Prakash Pandey, sought leave to withdraw the petition, …

KAVITA TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12‑09‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar when making any arrest. The State opposed the …

ANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anoj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 14.07.2026 under Sections 318(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus restraining his arrest. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State …

POLAVARAPU KRISHNA MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Polavarapu Krishna Mohan filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR dated 17/04/2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him under sections 308(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. 2023 and section 66D of the IT (Amendment) Act. While the State opposed the merits of …

RAJ CHAUHAN @ SATYAM SINGH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Chauhan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07‑09‑2026 under Section 87 of the BNS, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that …

UDAY LAIKAR @ UDAY LIKHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 11‑09‑2026 under sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S., and a mandamus restraining his arrest pending the petition. The petitioner’s counsel also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow …

PRATEEK @ PRIYANSHU @ PRATEEK JHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Prateek Jha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (i) quash of an FIR dated 11/09/2026 under sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S., and (ii) a mandamus restraining his arrest pending the petition. The petitioner also made an innocuous prayer that the police …

HONEY RAI @ PRAFUL RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Honey Rai @ Praful Rai filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑09‑2026 under Sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S., and a mandamus directing that he not be arrested while the petition is pending. The petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer …

AMAN AKHTAR @ AMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Aman Akhtar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑09‑2026 under Sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him while the petition is pending. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that the police be …

FARHEEN IRFAN AHMED AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR dated 09.09.2026 under Sections 316(2) and 351(2) BNS and mandamus to prevent their arrest and any coercive action. The respondents opposed the merits but did not object to an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh …

ROBIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Robin Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 09-11-2025 under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the …

ROBIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Robin Kumar and two others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26-11-2025 under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the …

ROBIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Robin Kumar and two others filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 04‑02‑2026 under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …

CHIMMAN @ NASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 18.07.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, and a writ of mandamus to restrain the State from arresting him. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous …

SMT. SANTOSH DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Smt. Santosh Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23469 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted leave for …

AMARENDRA @ AVANEND SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 06.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners prayed that the police follow the …

GANESH KASHYAPversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Ganesh Kashyap filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 30‑07‑2026 under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and also sought mandamus to restrain his arrest and any coercive …

BHARAT VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

Dismissed on merits

The petitioner, Bharat Verma, sought a writ of mandamus directing that all FIRs filed for non‑payment of deposit maturity amounts be merged with the first FIR (Case Crime No. 612 of 2024) and that no further FIRs be registered against him. The petition argued that the multiple FIRs were identical in …

VIMAL RAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03‑05‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him, alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed for leave to withdraw the petition, indicating an intention to pursue other legal remedies. The State of U.P., represented by the Additional Government Advocate, …

ASHUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashuddin filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21006 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the Attorney General, raised no objection to …

SANDEEP KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State, represented by …

UDAYBHAN AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Udaybhan and nine others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 29‑07‑2026 and a mandamus restraining their arrest under sections 191(2), 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. The State opposed the merits but did not object to an "innocuous …

MANJEET AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manjeet and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking the quash of an FIR dated 12‑07‑2026 filed under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also made an …

SANGAM PASWANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Sangam Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 05.07.2025 under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and a writ of mandamus directing the police not …

GAGAN KUMAR SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gagan Kumar Singhal, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23062 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Eishan Mehta, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The …

SMT. SARASWATI THAKUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Saraswati Thakur and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them in a case registered as Crime No. 26 of 2025 and a certiorari to quash the FIR dated 17.01.2025. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that …

RAMKESH SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramkesh Seth filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 09.09.2026 under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes/Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The petitioner sought quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing …

AVADHESH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Avadhesh and nine others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 07‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 333, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S.S., seeking its quashment and a mandamus to restrain their arrest. They also made an innocuous prayer that the …

BASHIR HAZIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Bashir Hazi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01‑09‑2026 and to restrain the police from taking coercive action against him under sections 74, 351(3) of the IPC, the B.N.S. Act and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner’s counsel also prayed that, …

LAVKUSH AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Lavkush and 11 others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23066 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State, represented by …

LAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Lal Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, without arguing the merits, requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The …

NISHA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nisha and four others, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 under IPC sections 351(2), 49 and 303(2) and protection from arrest. They also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of …

IBRAHIM KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ibrahim Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …

SMT SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Sunita Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 23021 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court. …

SMT. TANU GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Tanu Gupta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 19 July 2026 (Case Crime No.0348) under Section 87 of the B.N.S., and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The State, through the learned Additional …

SANJAY SINGH DHAKREY AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sanjay Singh Dhakrey and eight others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 459/2026 dated 7‑September‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested under various IPC and B.N.S. sections. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …

RAMESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramesh Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.12.2024 in a case under Sections 406 and 506 IPC and to stay his arrest. He prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar when making any arrest. The …

ABHISHEK SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged FIR No. 0219 of 2026 filed under sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and sought quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing police not to arrest them. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the …

ASIF @ AASIF AKTAR IDREESHIversusSTATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Asif @ Aasif Aktar Idreeshi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23075 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy. The State of U.P. and other …

JAI KISHAN AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 04‑12‑2025 under IPC sections 85, 115(2) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, and a mandamus restraining their arrest. Both parties submitted that the dispute had been amicably settled through a …

TAUFIK AHMAD @ TAUFIK AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR No. 0074 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent further arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been settled through a mediation and conciliation agreement dated 27.06.2026. Both parties, including …

GAJENDRA SINGH TEOTIA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gajendra Singh Teotia and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24.01.2026 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal …

CHETAN AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Chetan Agarwal and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 04.12.2025 under IPC sections 85 and 115(2) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, and a mandamus restraining their arrest. The parties had earlier settled the dispute …

INSAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Insad Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.05.2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest under various IPC sections. The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court. The State and other respondents submitted that …

TANU SINGH @ ROSHANI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Tanu Singh (Roshani Singh), filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Station House Officer of P.S. Rasra to conduct a fair and unbiased investigation in a criminal case (Crime No. 0238 of 2026) under various sections of the BNS. The State, represented by an Additional …

FAREED AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Fareed Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and other respondents to comply with a July 17, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate to register an FIR against certain individuals and to investigate the matter expeditiously. …

KRISHNA MURARI MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

Petitioners Krishna Murari Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to compel respondents 2 and 3 to vacate a road and to direct respondent 6 to decide their application under Sections 153 and 157 of the BNSS. After hearing, the …

SEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Seeta Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police, Fatehpur, to decide her application dated 13-07-2026 within the stipulated time. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the …

MOHD. SHAHVEZ AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of FIR dated 19.08.2026 (Case Crime No. 404 of 2026) under Sections 69, 316(2), 351(2), 352 and 78 of the BNS, seeking its quash and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest or harass them. After hearing, the …

AMRITPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Amritpal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 16‑01‑2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain the police from arresting them. The FIR alleged offences under sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, …

SMT. JAI DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 24.08.2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the …

HARIHAR PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Harihar Prasad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to order further investigation after his application on 5 January 2026. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's learned Additional Government Advocate informed the court …

SOFIYAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sofiyan Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10.05.2026 under Sections 110 and 352 of the BNS, and a writ of mandamus to restrain the police from arresting him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, …

CHANDRAJEET YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Chandrajeet Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to complete the investigation of an FIR dated 25.09.2025 and to arrest accused persons. The State argued that the investigation was completed and a charge sheet had been filed only against one accused, with …

SHIVAM CHATURVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shivam Chaturvedi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 21 June 2026 (Case Crime No. 0350/2026 under Section 74 B.N.S) and a writ of mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State, represented by the …

SAURABH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Saurabh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They sought the quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing the …

PRABHAT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Prabhat Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the absence of representation for the petitioner and …

SURENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Surendra Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12‑02‑2026 (Case Crime No. 49 of 2026) registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, and also a mandamus directing the State …

SATYENDRA VERMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24-11-2025 and a writ of mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging impropriety in the FIR under several sections of the BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State counsel informed the …

NEELAM MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to either conduct a fresh, fair investigation or transfer the case to another officer, and to order the arrest of co‑accused in a dowry‑related offence (Crime No. 0408 of 2025). The petitioner alleged that the investigation …

SIKANDARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest under several sections of the BNS. After arguing, the petitioner's counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue …

MUDIT JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mudit Jain filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 16‑04‑2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The FIR alleged offences under numerous sections of the BNS, 2023. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the …

INFORMANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07.05.2026 registered under Sections 75 and 115(2) of the BNS and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, and a writ of mandamus directing the arrest of a third respondent to ensure a fair …

BANI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 29.06.2026 under Section 326(d) of the B.N.S.S. and sections 2 and 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, and requested that the police not arrest them. They prayed that any arrest should follow the Supreme Court …

ADITYA KUMAR SINHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Aditya Kumar Sinha and another filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 06.07.2026 under Sections 308(2), 351(2) of the B.N.S.S and Section 67 of the IT Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in …

SAIR UDDIN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12.08.2026 under Sections 74, 191(2) and 115(2) of the B.N.S.S and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that any arrest be in accordance with the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The …

SPARSH ACHARYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sparsh Acharya and another, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 under Sections 308(4) and 352 of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police, before making any arrest, follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …

ASHISH RAJPUT AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ashish Rajput and seven others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 25‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They invoked Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and asked the court to enforce the Supreme Court’s …

MOHD ISLAM AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohammed Islam and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑09‑2026 registered under several sections of the B.N.S.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and to obtain a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow …

KESHAV SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 09.02.2026 registered under sections 318(4) and 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, if an arrest were contemplated, the police …

AMIT DHAMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 01.08.2026 under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, and also requested that the police not arrest them. The petitioners made an additional innocuous prayer that any arrest should …

HAJI BABU KURESHI @ BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Haji Babu Kureshi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 05‑09‑2026 under Sections 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court …

NEERAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a First Information Report dated 16‑07‑2026, filed under Sections 331(1), 329(3) and 223(B) of the B.N.S.S., seeking its quash and a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel also made an innocuous prayer that any arrest should follow the Supreme …

AHMAD MOOSAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ahmad Moosa, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22440 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Shailesh Kumar Tiwari, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The Attorney General (G.A.) raised no objection to the withdrawal request. The …

KAIF AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kaif and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01‑09‑2026 and to restrain their arrest under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 110, 115(2), 117(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The petition also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid …

BABLOOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Babloo filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 03.05.2026 under Sections 316(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and to restrain his arrest. The petitioner also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State …

SAGAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash FIR No. 31/2026 dated 19.01.2026, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 109 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and …

DESHVEER AND 30 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 23.01.2025 and a writ of mandamus to restrain their arrest under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. They argued that …

DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGARIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra Kumar Nagaria filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court held that the petition …

GIREESH CHANDRA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 3628 of 2025) was filed by Gireesh Chandra Agarwal against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the State's AGA was present. The Court held that the petition could not proceed due to …

VOSIYAR YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Vosiyar Yadav filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3944 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was listed, but the petitioner failed to appear before the Court, while the respondent’s Additional …

JATINDER URF JITENDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The writ petition filed by Jatinder Urf Jitendra was listed before the High Court of Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional Government Advocate and counsel for one respondent were present. The Court observed the absence of the petitioner’s …

RAJ KUMARI @ PRIYANKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (i) quash of an FIR dated 05.02.2025 under Section 87 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, (ii) a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them, (iii) a mandamus directing certain respondents to take action against a fourth …

SEEMA PANDEYversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERY

Seema Pandey filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3914 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and four others. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court, while the respondent's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed …

SANDEEP AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 06.02.2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the State was represented by learned A.G.A. S.N. Tiwari. The court noted an office …

SHIKHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.02.2026 under Section 137(2) B.N.S. 2023 and a mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest them. The State, through its A.G.A., informed the court that the investigation was complete and …

RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4443 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the …

SMT SHAHIN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking (i) a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12‑02‑2026 registered under Sections 87 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., (ii) a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them while the petition is pending, and (iii) a …

DEEPAK JAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Deepak Jain and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to address the court, although the Attorney General for the State was present. The court, noting the lack of prosecution, …

SHAHZADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 04‑02‑2026 (Case Crime No.0034 of 2026) and a writ of mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The FIR was registered under Sections 64, 89, 316(2) and …

NISHU SOLANKI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 05.04.2025 under Sections 498-A, 323, 506, 354 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. The petition was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, …

SAURABH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.03.2025 under sections 498-A, 313, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. No counsel appeared for the …

RAM PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Pratap Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10‑04‑2025 under sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the High Court, …

JATIN @ JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Jatin @ Jeetu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 16-04-2025 and a writ of prohibition to restrain his arrest under Sections 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the bench, while …

FARHANA ALIAS FARANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Farhana Alias Farana, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8923 of 2025) in the Allahabad High Court. The court later discovered that the original physical record of the petition had been inadvertently misplaced. The court directed the office to locate the original …

DEV GADARIYA ALIAS DEVENDER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 05-07-2025 and a writ of mandamus to restrain their arrest in a cognizable offence. Neither petitioner appeared before the court on the hearing dates, and the State was represented by …

RAM CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, proper and impartial investigation in a case under Sections 74, 333, 115(2) BN.S. 2023 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The State, through the Additional Advocate General, …

SAMIM @ BANTU @ MOTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Samim Bantu @ Mota, challenged an externment order dated 06.08.2026 issued under Section 3(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970, which sent him out of Agra district for six months. He filed a writ petition seeking (i) certiorari to quash the externment order, (ii) …

INTEZAR NOORI @ INTEZAR HUSSAINversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Intezar Noori, filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 27‑08‑2026 under Section 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, before any arrest, the police be directed …

VISHAL YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari order to quash an FIR dated 17‑09‑2025 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and a mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest them. The …

AJEET KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10‑07‑2026 (Crime No. 0170/2026) under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and B.N.S. 85, and a mandamus directing the third respondent not to arrest him. The State, represented by …

VIPUL PANDEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vipul Pandey and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 09‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 85 of the B.N.S.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and to restrain their arrest. They also made an innocuous prayer that …

KIRAN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kiran and seven others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 31.08.2026 and a stay on further investigation, invoking several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They also prayed that, before any arrest, the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court's …

SHIV SAGAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel, Sanjeev Patel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was …

KESHRI HIND AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Keshri Hind and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19‑08‑2026 (Crime No.0253 of 2026) registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, and also requested that they not be …

FAKARE ALAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash a First Information Report dated 29‑08‑2026 in Crime No. 0445 of 2026, filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 333 of the B.N.S, and prayed that the police not arrest them. They also requested that any arrest, if made, follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in …

SHAHJADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Shahjad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Mohd. Wasim, sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue other appropriate remedies. The State, represented by A.G.A. G.A., …

SHUAIB ALIAS MOHAMMAD SHUAIBversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31‑01‑2026 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 74 of the B.N.S.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and to restrain his arrest. The petitioner also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the …

HEERA LAL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Heera Lal Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 29‑03‑2026, filed under sections of the B.N.S.-2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and also sought a mandamus directing the …

SOHAIL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought to quash an FIR dated 26.07.2026 registered under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and requested that the police not arrest him, invoking the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State and other respondents opposed the quash …

RAJKUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajkumar and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 23‑06‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 118(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and to restrain their arrest. They made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the …

DILIP GIRI @ KARIYA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 13.08.2026 registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and to restrain the police from arresting them. They also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any …

ASLAN @ IRFAN (CORRECT NAME- ARSHALAN)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aslan @ Irfan (correctly named Arshalan), filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21225 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel, Bhrigi Jee Singh, sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The …

ABHISHEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, and the State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised no …

SUNIL KUMAR VAIDHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Sunil Kumar Vaidh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21223 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Vinod Kumar, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by Additional Government Advocate S.K. …

SANJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 18 July 2026 under sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State filed a charge‑sheet on 20 August 2026, after …

DHIRANJAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dhiranjan Kumar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21179 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two others. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue …

JAINUL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled and the compromise deed was verified by the magistrate. Both parties’ counsel …

VIPIN SINGH @ VIPPA PARIHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 2578 of 2026) was filed by Vipin Singh @ Vippa Parihar against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …

PRASHANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Prashant filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to produce CCTV footage from a police station for specific dates. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue other remedies. The …

MAHESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Mahesh Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioners were represented by counsel Anees Ahmad, while the State was represented by G.A. The petitioners failed to appear in …

VIPIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 72 of 2026, Meerut. They prayed that before any arrest the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits …

SUBASH PRAJAPATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Subash Prajapati and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15-11-2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, and a direction that they not be arrested. The State opposed the petition and informed …

NASIR HUSAIN AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Nasir Husain and ten others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court even after a revised call, while the respondent's Additional Government Advocate …

MOHAMMAD RAFIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Rafi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19462 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed for hearing and a revised call was made, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. …

SOVINDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sovindra, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19526 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Hemant Sharma, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State of U.P., …

MAHESH CHANDRA PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an FIR dated 26.05.2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(2) of the B.N.S. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had already been filed on …

TAKSHAM MALIK AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad listed Amendment Application No. 3 of 2026 along with previous papers in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19341 of 2026 filed by Taksham Malik and others against the State of U.P. and others. The order was dated 9 September 2026 and signed by Judges …

MOHD ISLAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mohd Islam and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 23 July 2026 under Section 420 IPC. They prayed that before any arrest, the police should adhere to the Supreme Court's guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar …

ARUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Arun filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his detention. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and placed in jail, rendering the petition moot. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the private respondent …

MOHD ASIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Asif, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 20‑06‑2026 under Sections 316(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and to obtain a direction that the police not arrest him. The petitioner also requested that any arrest follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh …

TABANK ANSARI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Tabank Ansari and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 24 June 2026, registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and to restrain their arrest. They also prayed that the police adhere to the Supreme Court …

RAMESH RAJPUT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ramesh Rajput and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19468 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue an appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State's counsel, …

MEHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26.05.2026 and a direction restraining the respondent from arresting him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had already been filed on …

ABHIMANYU YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhimanyu Yadav and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20040 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The …

RAJNISH KUMAR @ DR RAJNISH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajnish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared on the revised call, though the State's counsel was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and held that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, …

MANOJ BHATI @ MANOJ KUMAR BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Bhati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, which involves offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC, after a CBI charge‑sheet was filed on 30‑06‑2022. The …

LAXMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Laxman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20763 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Deepak Kumar Tripathi, later sought leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy under law. The State of U.P. and other …

KADIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25861 of 2025 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …

SMT KRISHNAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt Krishna filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Uma Nath Pandey, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The respondents, represented by G.A., raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing, …

BILAL AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bilal Ahmad and five others, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had earlier settled their marital dispute through a …

PREETAM SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners Preetam Singh and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 12181 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the …

OMVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Omveer Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of …

NARENDRA SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, impartial and expeditious investigation of an FIR dated 22-04-2026 and to produce the case diary and investigation records before the court. The State, represented by the learned …

GULSHAN BHARGAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 under Sections 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him while the petition was pending. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel …

FIRM S.J. ENTERPRISESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

S.J. Enterprises filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 14031 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue other …

RANJEET SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 21‑07‑2026, supporting its position with a short …

AJAY NOTIYAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Ajay Notiyal and three others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15994 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. They were represented by counsel Anju Yadav, Vivek Kumar Sharma, Ashutosh Tripathi, Kuldeep Singh, Puneet Kumar and Vikas Kumar Yadav. During …

JIGAR SAHNIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jigar Sahni, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16272 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Akash Kumar Verma, subsequently moved the Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Attorney …

HAKIKATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 18.05.2026 (Case Crime No.189 of 2026) and a direction restraining the third respondent from arresting him. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) and 194(2) of the Indian Penal Code. …

C.B. SINGH @ CHANDRABALI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 16566 of 2026) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by C.B. Singh @ Chandrabali Singh against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajnish Kumar Verma, sought leave to withdraw the petition after hearing. …

RANG BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rang Bahadur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of FIR No. 245/2024 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the …

MOHAMMAD SAAD @ KALA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18004 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners moved the Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, …