Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
280 judgments · newest first · showing 201–280
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 14‑05‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and seek alternative remedies. The …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 14 July 2026 and to restrain the police from arresting them, invoking the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits of the petition but did not object to an innocuous prayer that the police follow those …
The petitioners, Mohd Karim and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The counsel for one of the respondents, Rohit Singh, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11.05.2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him until a charge-sheet is filed. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and seek …
The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Kumar Majhi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20 July 2026 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20‑07‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. After arguments, the petitioner's counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them under several penal provisions. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 01.07.2026 (Case Crime No. 0139 of 2026) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a …
Awadesh Pathak filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 22‑06‑2026 under sections 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down …
Petitioners Nadeem Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 272 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest under sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. 2023 and the 3/4 D.P. Act. They prayed that the police, before making any arrest, …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20695 of 2026) was filed by Jagpal and three others against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioners' counsel, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, failed to appear even after a revised call. Respondent counsel, including C.P. Pandey and the Additional …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under sections 333, 352, 115(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the arrest …
Petitioner Sonara Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (1) a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.08.2026 under Sections 80(2), 85 of the BNS Act read with Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and (2) a mandamus directing the State not to arrest her under the same FIR. After hearing, …
Petitioners Omprakash Gond and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.08.2026 (Crime No. 279 of 2026) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. After …
The petitioner Anil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 17.08.2026 under Sections 221, 132 and 352 and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel prayed, as an innocuous request, that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar …
Petitioner Aysha Khatoon filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to order a CBI investigation under Sections 318(4) and 351(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR dated 10-10-2025. The State, through the learned Additional …
Shivam Singh Rathore filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑02‑2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 125 and 127(2) of the B.N.S. and to obtain a direction that he not be arrested. He also prayed that the police, before making any arrest, follow the Supreme …
Petitioner Arvind Kumar Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21358 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the …
Petitioners Rahis Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners prayed for leave to withdraw the petition and to seek any other appropriate remedy. The State and other respondents, represented by the learned …
Petitioner Kaushal Katiyar filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 24.01.2026 under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352 and 351(3) B.N.S., and a direction restraining his arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge‑sheet had already …
Petitioners Ram Khelawan and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 23‑06‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They requested the police to follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar regarding arrests. The …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 0245 of 2026 (sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S.) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines …
Petitioners Keshav Rajput and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 before …
The petitioners, Rais Ahmad and another, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They argued that the police should follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar regarding arrest procedures. The State …
Arun Tunda filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 26.07.2026 under Sections 276, 277, 318 and 319 of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar …
Petitioners Arun Dagar and three others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 05.08.2026 under Section 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioners prayed that any arrest should follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State …
The petitioner, Surendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking to pursue other legal remedies. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised …
Petitioners Pappu Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19‑03‑2026 under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 324(4) and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar …
The petitioner, Mohd Ansar Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26-11-2025 under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2008, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, if arrest were …
Petitioners Dr. Raina Nivedita Samuel and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 0181 of 2026, registered under sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the B.N.S., and a direction restraining their arrest. They contended that the investigation had …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 to order respondent No.4 to submit documentary evidence filed on 28‑10‑2025 and to comply with an order dated 28‑11‑2025. The petitioner also prayed to approach the …
Petitioner Sabir filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 under Sections 74, 352 and 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel requested that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …
Petitioner Ujjwal Kumar Jaisawal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 27‑07‑2026 (Crime No. 0228/2026) under sections 331(3) and 305 of the BNS, 2023, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State, through the learned Additional …
Petitioners Mohd Ahsan and seven others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 17‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits …
Petitioner Rishi Kumar Budhauriya filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.08.2026 and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, offering to pursue other remedies. The …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 106 and 123 of the BNS and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, …
The petitioners Deen Mohammad and another filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 85, 352, 115(2), 79, 127(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …
The petitioners Sumit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and two others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any other …
The petitioners, Natthu Yadav alias Ashok and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 29621 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call, while the learned …
The petitioner, Akram Khan, filed a writ petition seeking protection for his daughter, a minor born on 10 July 2009, who alleged that her father forced her to marry against her will and that she feared for her life. The prosecutrix, a matriculate, testified before a Judicial Magistrate that she …
The petitioner, Abhishek Bansal, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 0125 of 2024, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The dispute was matrimonial, involving the petitioner (husband) and respondent No.4 (wife), and the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed in the trial court, rendering the petition apparently infructuous. The petitioners, through their counsel, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashal of an FIR (Case Crime No. 0125 of 2024) registered under Sections 85, 115, 352, 351, 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The High Court noted that the same …
Petitioners Akhilesh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief. After a final report was filed, the petitioners, through counsel, requested to withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the prayer, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and granted liberty to file a fresh …
Ashok Kumar obtained an acquittal from the District Judge, Bijnor, and subsequently received a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the police to obtain a passport. He filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25436 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking further relief. The petitioners, …
Petitioners Smt. Simran and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25594 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court accepted the prayer and ordered the petition dismissed as …
The petitioner, Abhinav, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8016 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After the charge sheet was submitted in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner's counsel, Vivek Kumar Yadav, moved the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The Court …
The petitioners, Dr. Matili Raj and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 10234 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three other respondents. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice J.J. Munir and …
The petitioners, Saurabh Kumar and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quash of an FIR alleging that they defrauded an informant of Rs. 22 lakh by promising a police Sub‑Inspector post in Madhya Pradesh and providing a forged selection list. The petitioners contended that the …
The petitioner, a 17‑year‑old minor, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of the FIR alleging that he had taken away the prosecutrix, also a minor, by blandishment and attempted to molest her. The FIR described that the prosecutrix was taken away almost by force and that …
The petitioner, Osama, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of an FIR dated 22 April 2026 that alleged his involvement in an assault on an informant. The FIR, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, described a severe assault resulting …
The petitioners sought interference with a First Information Report (FIR) that alleged they obstructed a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and government officials during a public road construction, using criminal force and brickbatting police and revenue officers. The FIR described a pandemonium that …
The petitioner, Bablu Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of FIR No. 0015 of 2026 dated 26-04-2026, which alleged rape, assault, and fraudulent withdrawal of Rs.2,500 from the victim's fiancé's bank account. The FIR listed offences under Sections …
The petitioners, a group of locals, were named in an FIR after a Scorpio car hit a bicycle ridden by a 15‑year‑old boy and a parked car. In protest, the petitioners organized a blockade of the Mau‑Azamgarh Highway from 3:30 pm to 6:30 pm, causing traffic jams and preventing ambulances from reaching …
The petitioners, both adults, married each other under Hindu rites on 16-12-2025. Their families objected and the first petitioner's brother filed an FIR (Crime No. 248 of 2025) under Section 87 of the BNS alleging that the second petitioner had taken away the first petitioner by blandishment. The …
The petitioner, Nikhil Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) filed against him. During the pendency of the petition, the police submitted a final report, indicating the closure of the investigation. The petitioner sought to withdraw the …
The petitioners sought quash of an FIR dated 10‑08‑2025 filed under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) BNS and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kanpur Dehat. The State expressed no …
The petitioners, both adults, married under Hindu rites on 18 March 2026 and live together as husband and wife. The petitioner’s grandmother objected and lodged an FIR under Section 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping. The petitioners contended that the FIR was an abuse of process …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an FIR registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 131 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the alleged assault on the informant's sons was not substantiated. The FIR described an incident on 1 …
The petitioners, seven accused persons, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of the FIR alleging they assaulted Mursad Ali to deter his testimony in other cases. The FIR details the assault with sticks and resulting internal injuries, and a medico‑legal report confirms …
The petitioner, Rashid, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of the FIR alleging his involvement in a violent assault that resulted in injuries to four persons and the death of Abdul Rauf. The assault involved sticks and sharp-edged weapons, causing abrasions, contusions, incised …
The petitioner, Gajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of an FIR dated 28 January 2026, which alleged his involvement in a narcotics offence under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, based on statements of co‑accused who claimed they would deliver 113 kg of …
The petitioners, Kasim Khan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR alleging that they were involved in negotiating a contract killing. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, opposed the petition. The …
Sanju alias Sanjay Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 9281 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Additional Government Advocate Anil Kumar Mishra. The …
The petitioner, Sandhya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR that alleged she, along with associates, defrauded an informant of Rs. 1,50,000 by promising doubled returns through cryptocurrency investments and issuing a fake passbook. The petitioner contended that …
The petitioner, Suraj Jumani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quash of FIR dated 20-12-2025 (Crime No. 303 of 2025) alleging cheating in a share‑broker scheme. The FIR alleges that the petitioner induced an informant to invest Rs. 22 lakh by claiming affiliation …
The petitioners Sunita alias Soni and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, alleging that they were assaulted by the accused and that the investigation was inadequate. The FIR described an assault on the informant's mother with an iron rod, …
Petitioners Kuldeep Gupta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Ravindra Prakash Srivastava, moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn because certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts could not be pleaded. …
Petitioners Manorma Gupta and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition but later moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn because certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts could not be pleaded. The Court accepted the prayer, dismissed the petition as withdrawn …
The petitioners, Dauli and her husband, are adults who married on 16 January 2026. The father of the first petitioner, a respondent, filed an FIR on 28 October 2025 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. Act, 2023, alleging that the husband had abducted his daughter. The petitioners contended that the FIR …
Amir Ali and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3763 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the petitioners themselves were absent. The State was represented by Additional …
The petitioner, Sanvvar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him by the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The respondents submitted that a charge-sheet had been filed and the trial court had taken cognizance of the offence. The learned Additional …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 08.02.2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain their arrest. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and described a violent brawl resulting in grievous injuries. The Court examined the scope of its power under …
The petitioner, Ram Naresh Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing police authorities to decide his representation. The petition alleged that the investigation had led to a charge-sheet and cognizance taken by the trial court, and that the …
Virendra Kumar Agrawal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to ensure a fair, impartial and speedy investigation into a case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, to order the arrest of …
The appellant Hari filed a criminal appeal, but a report dated 15.12.2025 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura confirmed that Hari died while the appeal was pending. The High Court verified the death and considered the effect on the pending appeal. The Court held that the death of the sole …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No. 396 of 2020) and the non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued against them. They contended that they were on bail but could not appear in court due to unavoidable …
Mahendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash, and a mandamus to prevent, an order dated 13‑01‑2026 passed by Respondent No. 3 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act in case 1489 of 2025. The petitioner had appealed that order and …
The petitioner, Jharkhandey Prasad, sought permission to compound an alleged offence under the Electricity Act by depositing a specified amount and filing an application before the trial court. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the court allow him to deposit Rs.20,000 with the U.P. Power …
Petitioner Rajesh Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 06.11.2024 registered under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, and a mandamus to prevent his arrest. The petitioner later withdrew the request to quash the FIR …
