M/S DEEP INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.
2019 INSC 129928 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Deep Industries Ltd, was contractually terminated by ONGC for allegedly supplying second‑hand equipment and was subsequently black‑listed for two years. The dispute was referred to arbitration, where the arbitrator stayed the blacklist order conditionally, and the first appeal under Section 37 was dismis…
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANRversusVIJAYANAGARAM CHINNA REDDAPPA
2023 INSC 72628 April 2023Dismissed
The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that granted a writ of habeas corpus, directing the release of a life convict (P. Reddy Bhaskar) who had escaped twice and was later sentenced to a one‑year simple imprisonment for kidnapping. After being granted special remission for his life sentence, th…
HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.DIA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA
2019 INSC 128927 November 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of writ petitions filed by Hindustan Construction Company Ltd seeking to strike down Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the deletion of Section 26 of the 2015 Amendment, arguing that they revived an automatic‑stay of arbitral awards and removed th…
SATYAMA DUBEY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2020 INSC 61227 October 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions and intervention applications filed under Article 32 seeking a fair investigation into the gang‑rape and murder of a 19‑year‑old girl in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh, and alleging illegal cremation of the victim. The State Government had already ordered the Central Bureau of …
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC.versusDR. P. A. BHATT & ORS. ETC.
2023 INSC 43426 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Non‑MBBS medical officers (Ayurveda, Unani, etc.) filed writ petitions seeking parity in pay with MBBS doctors, invoking the Tikku Pay Commission recommendations. The State of Gujarat, after initially extending higher pay scales to these officers, withdrew the benefit, leading to appeals before the High Court, which gr…
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITEDversusCYRUS INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
2021 INSC 21726 March 2021Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the NCLAT order that had declared Tata Sons' affairs oppressive and prejudicial, reinstated Cyrus Pallonji Mistry (CPM) as Executive Chairman and Director, restrained the Tata Trust nominees, and set aside the conversion of Tata Sons from a public to a private company. The Court held that the…
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
2021 INSC 22226 March 2021Dismissed
The Association for Democratic Reforms and Common Cause filed two interlocutory applications seeking a stay on the sale of electoral bonds under the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018, alleging that the scheme permits donor anonymity and violates transparency in political funding. The Court examined the scheme’s statutory bas…
INDUS BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITEDversusKOTAK INDIA VENTURE (OFFSHORE) FUND (EARLIER KNOWN AS KOTAK INDIA VENTURE LIMITED) & ORS.
2021 INSC 21626 March 2021Case Partly allowed
Indus Biotech Private Ltd sought arbitration against Kotak India Venture Fund and related entities over the formula for converting optionally convertible redeemable preference shares into equity shares, claiming no default existed. Kotak filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) seeki…
R. PALANISAMY & ORS.versusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADRAS & ORS.
2020 INSC 46424 July 2020Dismissed
Twenty-two employees (record clerks and office assistants) filed a writ petition seeking promotion to the post of Junior Bailiff without the required SSLC qualification, relying on a 2009 High Court order and arguing that the vacancies arose before the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016. T…
SUDHA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2021 INSC 27123 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The accused, alleged to be a contract killer and member of an organized crime gang, was arrested under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for the murder of Rajnarain Singh. The Allahabad High Court granted him bail on liberal terms despite his prior involvement in fiftee…
SHRI SHIVAJI EDUCATION SOCIETY, AMRAVATI THROUGH ITS PRESIDENTversusOMPRAKASH S/O DINKAR DESHMUKH & ORS.
2021 INSC 76622 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned a house originally owned by Shri Kashirao Deshmukh, who died leaving his wife Smt. Shevantabai. The wife executed a gift deed in 1981 transferring the property to the appellant. The defendants produced a 1976 Will of the deceased, claiming it gave the wife only a life estate, rendering the gift de…
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PEOPLE’S MOVEMENTS & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2020 INSC 55822 September 2020Dismissed
The petitioners, National Alliance for People’s Movements and others, challenged the categorisation adopted by the High‑Powered Committee (HPC) of Maharashtra for granting interim bail or parole to prisoners during the Covid‑19 pandemic, alleging that the exclusion of certain categories—such as serious economic offence…
MAHARASHTRA SEAMLESS LIMITEDversusPADMANABHAN VENKATESH & ORS.
2020 INSC 7622 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) involving United Seamless Tubular Private Ltd., where the successful resolution applicant, Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. (MSL), had offered an upfront payment of Rs. 477 crore, which was below the average liquidation value of Rs. 597.54 crore deter…
SANJAY RAGHUNATH AGARWALversusTHE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2023 INSC 40820 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a chartered accountant, was arrested in September 2022 after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed an information report and a prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA) alleging his involvement in a fraudulent Global Depository Receipt (GDR) scheme that misappropriated fu…
APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIAversusAJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA
2023 INSC 14620 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The husband filed for divorce on the ground of adultery and sought a DNA test of their son, born during the marriage, to establish paternity. The Family Court and the High Court ordered the DNA test, but the Supreme Court set aside those orders, holding that the conclusive presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of…
M/S KALEDONIA JUTE AND FIBRES PVT. LTD.versusM/S AXIS NIRMAN AND INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS.
2020 INSC 64819 November 2020Appeal(s) allowed
M/s Kaledonia Jute and Fibres Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) sought to recover a debt from M/s Axis Nirman and Industries Ltd. (first respondent) and filed a petition under Section 7 of the IBC before the NCLT. Simultaneously, a winding‑up petition against the first respondent was pending before the Allahabad High Court, which …
GHANSHYAM UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2020 INSC 49919 August 2020Dismissed
Ghanshyam Upadhyay, a lawyer, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking the dissolution of a Commission of Inquiry that was set up to investigate the alleged encounter killing of Vikas Dubey. He alleged bias and conflict of interest against the Commission's Chairman, Justice B.S. Chauhan, and its member, K.L. Gup…
M.K. RANJITSINH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2021 INSC 25819 April 2021Directions issued
The petitioners, environmentalists, sought protection for the Great Indian Bustard (GIB) and Lesser Florican, arguing that overhead power lines in Rajasthan and Gujarat cause fatal collisions. They requested that the states and the Union underground all future power lines in priority and potential habitats, convert exi…
SALEM MUSLIM BURIAL GROUND PROTECTION COMMITTEEversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS
2023 INSC 55118 May 2023Dismissed
The Salem Muslim Burial Ground Protection Committee claimed that a parcel of land (Zamin Survey No.5108) in Salem was a Muslim burial ground and therefore a wakf, seeking to prevent its alienation under the Tamil Nadu Estate (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948. Various private claimants had earlier sought …
SECURITY PRINTING AND MINTING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. ETCversusVIJAY D. KASBE AND ORS. ETC
2023 INSC 38818 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, supervisory employees of the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd., claimed double overtime allowance under Section 59(1) of the Factories Act, 1948 for work performed between 1988 and 2005. Their claim arose while they were central government servants holding civil posts, and therefor…
BALASORE ALLOYS LIMITEDversusMEDIMA LLC
2020 INSC 55016 September 2020Dismissed
Balasore Alloys Ltd filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator based on Clause 7 of 37 purchase orders. Medima LLC contended that the parties were bound by an earlier ‘Umbrella’ (Pricing) Agreement dated 31‑03‑2018, which contain…
A. SRINIVASULUversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2023 INSC 97115 June 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved senior officials of BHEL and private individuals accused of conspiring to award a contract for a desalination plant through a restricted tender, allegedly causing a loss of Rs.4.32 crore to the PSU. The prosecution relied heavily on the testimony of an approver who had been granted pardon under Sectio…
M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS. ETC.versusM. S. MURTHY & ORS. ETC.
2023 INSC 58115 June 2023Disposed off
The case arose from a 1955‑56 partition suit concerning the estate of Nawab Khurshid Jah, where a preliminary decree dated 28‑06‑1963 declared certain lands as Mathruka property. The decree was later used by decree‑holders and their assignees to claim title over the land, leading to numerous execution and claim petitio…
VICTORY IRON WORKS LTD.versusJITENDRA LOHIA & ANR
2023 INSC 23014 March 2023Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a dispute arising out of a corporate insolvency resolution process involving Avani Towers (the corporate debtor), Energy Properties (the ostensible owner of a 10.19‑acre land), and Victory Iron Works (a licensee of a 10,000 sq ft portion). The corporate debtor had financed the purchase of t…
RAMAN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusR. NATARAJAN
2022 INSC 95413 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a 1993 agreement of sale of land, which was conditioned on the defendant first entering into an agreement with his brother's wife to purchase a parcel of her land for access. The trial court granted specific performance, the first appellate court reversed, and the …
JOLLY GEORGE AND ANR.versusGEORGE ELIAS AND ASSOCIATES AND ORS.
2023 INSC 36512 April 2023Disposed off
George Elias & Associates, engaged in road works, purchased Hot Mix Plants and obtained an Acknowledgement Certificate under the Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Facilitation Act, 2019, as well as "Consent to Establish" from the Kerala State Pollution Control Board. Their application for a licence to in…
RAVINDER NATH AGARWALversusYOGENDER NATH AGARWAL & ORS.
2021 INSC 8612 February 2021Disposed off
The petitioners, Major Ravinder Nath Agarwal and his sister Lily Nath, sought transfer of a partition suit and a testamentary case involving a Will dated 06‑04‑2011 of their father. The first petition asked to move the partition suit from the Additional District Judge, Saket, Delhi to the District Court, Nainital, whil…
BGS SGS SOMA JVversusNHPC LTD.
2019 INSC 134910 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners BGS SGS SOMA JV sought to enforce an arbitral award concerning a hydro‑electric project, while the respondent NHPC Ltd filed a Section 34 petition in the Faridabad court to set aside the award. The petitioners applied under Section 151 CPC to have the petition returned to the appropriate court, and the …
PRAMOD SINGLAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
2023 INSC 34410 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Pramod Singla, was detained under the COFEPOSA Act for alleged involvement in a gold smuggling syndicate and filed representations to the detaining authority, the Central Government, and the Advisory Board. The Court examined whether there was a conflict between the Pankaj Kumar and Abdullah Kunhi judgme…
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND ANRversusSRI M. NARASIMHA PRASAD
2023 INSC 34210 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Sri M. Narasimha Prasad, a Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Karnataka, was suspended on allegations of gross misconduct and subjected to departmental inquiries. The Full Court of the Karnataka High Court, after finding several serious charges proved—particularly pronouncing the operative portion of judgments without th…
SWAMINATHAN & ORS.versusALANKAMONY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
2022 INSC 2839 March 2022Dismissed
The case concerned the revocation of letters of administration granted to a brother of the deceased under a registered will dated 23‑08‑1991. Another brother filed an application for revocation, alleging that all legal heirs had not been impleaded in the proceedings. The Madurai Bench of the High Court held that a "jus…
GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY & ANR.versusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS
2023 INSC 5048 May 2023Dismissed
The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., surrendered land reserved for a recreation ground in Greater Mumbai and obtained a Development Rights Certificate (DRC) but later sought additional Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for the amenity. Their claim was rejected by the Municipal Corporation, first…
RANA AYYUBversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
2023 INSC 1017 February 2023Dismissed
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner conducted three crowdfunding campaigns on the Ketto platform. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opened investigations under FEMA and later filed a complaint under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA), attaching the petitioner’s bank account in Navi Mumbai. The Specia…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHAIKH MAHEMUD & ANR.
2022 INSC 3956 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra appointed Shaikh Mahemud as a member of the Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs by a notification on 13 September 2019. The appointment was later cancelled by a notification dated 4 March 2022, prompting Shaikh to file a writ petition. The High Court set aside the cancellation, holding that Sectio…
HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED (H.Z.L.)versusAJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
2019 INSC 13194 December 2019Disposed off
Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) operates four units and a captive power plant, and entered into open‑access agreements with Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd (AVVNL) for wheeling power to three of its units. A dispute arose over unscheduled interchange (UI) charges under clauses 8 and 9 of the agreements. The Rajasthan Electr…
M/S. SESHASAYEE STEELS P. LTD.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE VI(2), CHENNAI
2019 INSC 13204 December 2019Dismissed
M/s Seshasayee Steels Ltd entered into an agreement to sell land to Vijay Santhi Builders Ltd and granted a licence to commence construction, later executing a Power of Attorney and a compromise deed that reduced the consideration and stipulated payment by post‑dated cheques, all of which were encashed. The Assessing O…
M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD.V. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS
2019 INSC 13103 December 2019Dismissed
The corporate debtor, holding a mining lease that was about to expire, sought a deemed extension of the lease through its resolution professional during a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The Karnataka Government rejected the extension, prompting the resolution professional to obtain a direction from the…
SAKHARAM SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS & ANR.versusKISHANRAO
2022 INSC 13123 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Two sons of Tukaram filed a suit for declaration and possession of immovable property against two sons of Gangaram, with their mother as a proforma defendant. The suit was dismissed, but the first appeal reversed the decision in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants filed a second appeal, during which the proforma de…