Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VIKAS BUDHWAR

583 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

RAJENDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusRAJESH CHAURASIYA, SDM AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajendra and three others, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the applicants, Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the application …

SHAH FAISHALversusSHRI JOGENDRA KUMAR, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Shah Faishal filed a contempt petition against the Commissioner of Police alleging failure to comply with an order issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano & Another v. State of U.P. and others). The petitioner produced an FIR dated 30 September 2026 to support the …

PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTAversusSHRI MIRZA FAHIM AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Gupta, alleged that the respondents stopped paying his salary in March 2026 despite a 12 July 2017 order directing regular payment following a writ petition for regularisation of his services. The High Court examined whether this non‑payment constituted contempt of the …

SHIV POOJAN GIRI AND 11 OTHERSversusSHIVAM PANDEY

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 18-12-2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.19146 of 2025. The court examined the claim and found a prima facie case for contempt but chose not to issue a notice at this …

INDRA PAL SINGHversusDR. NETESH KUMAR BHODELEY

Indra Pal Singh filed a contempt application against Dr. Netesh Kumar Bhodeley alleging willful disobedience of a judgment and order dated 08‑10‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15206 of 2025. The applicant claimed the order was served but not complied with. The court observed that a prima …

SANJAY KUMARversusINDRADEV SINGH

Sanjay Kumar filed a contempt application against Indradev Singh alleging willful non‑compliance of an order dated 01‑04‑2026 passed in Writ A No. 4546/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing a notice, …

BHAIYAN LALversusSHRI GYAN SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHER

Bhaiyan Lal filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents willfully defied an order dated 11 March 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi, in Misc. Application No. 05 of 2026. The court was presented with instructions that included a copy of FIR No. 0302 dated 28 …

ALOKIK SHARMAversusSHRI CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Alokik Sharma filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate, alleging willful defiance of the order dated 17‑06‑2021 passed in Writ‑C No. 6822 of 2021 (Alokik Sharma v. State of U.P. and 3 others). The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the order had not been …

RAMESH CHANDRAversusMR SANTOSH KUMAR

Ramesh Chandra filed a contempt application against Santosh Kumar alleging willful defiance of an order dated 07‑01‑2025 passed by the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 42309 of 2028. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not …

HEMANT KUMAR SHARMAversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hemant Kumar Sharma, filed a contempt application seeking to punish the respondents for allegedly disobeying and routing a judgment dated 4 December 2014 in the case of Smt Razeena Bano & others v. State of U.P. The applicant later moved the court to withdraw the contempt petition, …

SMT SUNITA PANDEYversusDR UPASANA RANI VERMA

Smt. Sunita Pandey filed a contempt application alleging that Dr. Upasana Rani Verma failed to comply with the order dated 25‑05‑2026 in Writ A No. 8049/2026, which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no compliance had …

DILSHADversusSRI BRIJESH KUMAR, TEHSILDAR SORAON, TEHSIL SORAON

The applicant, Dilshad, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 6898 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the underlying writ petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the applicant requested that the contempt …

RAMAADHAR YADAVversusSHRI VIVEK MISHRA, IN-CHARGE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Ramaadhar Yadav filed a contempt application against Shri Vivek Mishra, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 18‑05‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 7456 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed because the opposite party had not complied with the writ order despite …

HOTI LALversusSRI BRIJESH KUMAR, COLLECTOR, COLLECTRATE COMPOUND

Hoti Lal filed a contempt application alleging that Sri Brijesh Kumar, Collector, failed to comply with the order dated 19‑05‑2026 in Writ C No. 19486/2026 which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no action had been …

M/S SS ASSOCIATESversusSRI SHAMBHU KUMAR

The applicant, M/S Ss Associates, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Shambhu Kumar, failed to comply with an order dated 06-10-2025 issued in Writ C No. 32030/2025 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court examined the claim that the order had been …

NURUL HASAN AND ANOTHERversusSHIVASHARANAPPA GN.

Nurul Hasan and another filed a contempt application against Shivasharanappa Gn., alleging that the opposite party had failed to comply with an order dated 06.05.2026 in Writ C No.16393/2026 which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful …

SHRI CHAND SINGHversusMR AVINASH PANDEY

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 20‑02‑2026 in Writ A No. 2550/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to issue a …

SHRI PALversusSHRI SHAILENDRA ASTHANA, GENERAL MANAGER

The applicant, Shri Pal, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Shri Shailendra Asthana, General Manager, failed to comply with the order dated 12 May 2026 in Writ A No. 7075/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that the opposite party had been …

JAGDISH PRASAD TRIPATHIversusAMIT PAL SHARMA AND 10 OTHERS

The applicant, Jagdish Prasad Tripathi, filed a contempt application seeking to enforce an order dated 12 March 2025 and to punish the respondents for alleged willful disobedience. He subsequently moved the court to withdraw the contempt application, citing an inherent technical defect and …

DURVIJAY YADAVversusPANKAJ KUMAR SHAHI

The applicant, Durvijay Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Pankaj Kumar Shahi, failed to comply with an order dated 24 April 2026 issued in PIL No. 420 of 2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had …

ONKAR NATH AND 2 OTHERSversusSRI PAWAN KUMAR GANGWAR

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 28‑10‑2025 issued in Writ C No. 27764/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court examined the claim and found a prima facie case of willful disobedience but …

M/S NIRANJAN SALES AND 2 OTHERSversusMS M. ARUNMOZHI

M/s Niranjan Sales and two others filed a contempt application seeking to summon Ms M. Arunmozhi and punish her for allegedly willfully disobeying an order dated 13 July 2026 in Writ‑C No.26309 of 2026. The applicants argued that without such relief they would suffer irreparable loss and injury. The …

SHOBHAWATI AND ANOTHERversusMOHD AMAAN AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a 20 April 2018 order that directed the respondents to hand over vacant possession of allotted land. The applicant claimed that although possession was initially handed over in 2018, the respondents demolished the boundary wall …

SMT. BHAGWATI AND 5 OTHERSversusSARVENDRA SINGH AND 8 OTHERS

The applicants, Smt. Bhagwati and five others, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. They later sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to re‑file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents …

RADHESHYAMversusPRAMOD-II

Radheshyam filed a contempt application alleging that Pramod‑II failed to comply with the order dated 23‑03‑2026 in Writ C No. 3565/2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted a prima facie case of willful disobedience but declined to issue a notice at this stage. …

SAJJAD AHAMAD AND ANOTHERversusSATYENDRA KUMAR AND 15 OTHERS

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a stay order dated 04‑02‑2026 that restrained demolition of structures on land covered by Criminal Revision No. 599 of 2026. The stay order related to Arazi No. 993 under Section 152 of the BNSS, 2023, while the applicants …

M/S SANTOSH PALversusSRI AMRIT ABHIJAT

The applicant, M/s Santosh Pal, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Amrit Abhijat, willfully disobeyed a judgment and order dated 19‑05‑2026 in Writ‑C No. 19526 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had …

NAR SINGHversusAKANKSHA GAUTAM

Nar Singh filed a contempt application alleging that Akanksha Gautam had failed to comply with the order dated 27 April 2026 in Writ B No. 1810/2026, which required her to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no action was taken. The court examined …

MATIN HUSAINversusSRI RAJEEV KRISHNA AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Matin Husain, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel Suresh Kumar Gupta sought to withdraw the application. The standing counsel for the opposite party raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request …

PRATHAM KUMARversusSHRI BALA KRISHNA NARAYAN

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a contempt application filed by Pratham Kumar alleging willful defiance of a December 4, 2025 order in Writ‑C No. 40711/2025. The original order directed the petitioner to obtain a certified copy of a government directive concerning the control of a private …

RASHMI TRIPATHIversusDR. NAUSAHD KHAN

The applicant, Rashmi Tripathi, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Namit Srivastava, subsequently moved to withdraw the application. The standing counsel for the court raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the request …

CHAMAN LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSRI SEEPOO GIRI

The petitioners, Chaman Lal and three others, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties demolished encroachments on 01‑04‑2026 in violation of the High Court’s order dated 06‑04‑2026, which had imposed a status‑quo and required the parties to be heard before any demolition. The …

SUMAN KUMARIversusSMT. AASHA CHAUDHARY, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

The High Court entertained a contempt petition filed by Suman Kumari alleging non‑compliance with its order dated 22 July 2026, which had set aside a termination order and directed her reinstatement as an Assistant Teacher. The order was issued in an intra‑court appeal (Special Appeal No. 788/2026) …

RATNESH SINGHversusMS. KAMINI CHAUHAN RATAN

The applicant, Ratnesh Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh failed to comply with the High Court’s order dated 03‑04‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 4728/2026, which required the disciplinary authority to conclude proceedings against him within four weeks. Despite the …

CHITRANJAN KUMARversusALKA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Chitranjan Kumar alleging willful defiance of its earlier order dated 13 November 2025, which had directed the petitioner to submit a reply to a charge‑sheet within two weeks and for the Inquiry Officer to decide the matter …

ABDUL HAMIDversusSRI RAJESH SRIVASTAVA

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 08 July 2026 in Writ Tax No. 3013 of 2026, which directed the respondent authorities to refund road tax paid for a hybrid electric vehicle and expressly barred interest. The order required the refund …

SANJEEV DHOUNDIYALversusSHRI VIKAS YADAV ASSISTANT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the Assistant Regional Transport Officer willfully defied a High Court order dated 09.07.2026, which directed the refund of road tax paid for a hybrid electric vehicle and stipulated no interest. The order required the refund of Rs.1,56,900 …

KAMINIversusSRI ABHISHEK BHARTI

Kamini filed a civil contempt application (No. 6441 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against Sri Abhishek Bharti, alleging non‑compliance with an order of the Writ Court. The applicant's counsel, Anil Babu and Ayush Shukla, informed the bench that the order had in fact been complied with. …

SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA AND 129 OTHERSversusSRI MODAK RAJESH D. RAO,

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 03‑04‑2026 issued in Writ Petition No. 4715 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case existed for contempt but, instead of issuing a notice, it granted the opposite …

RAM JATAN MAURYAversusSADANAND GUPTA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, the District Magistrate, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 14 January 2026 in Civil Misc. Writ-(C) No.14576 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but declined to issue a …

DEEPTI MINJ AND 3 OTHERSversusPANKAJ MITTAL AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Deepti Minj and three others, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6890 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. They later sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to re‑file a fresh petition. The standing counsel for the …

GOVIND PRASAD GUPTA AND 11 OTHERSversusMR MUKUL ANAND PANDEY

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 05/12/2025 in Writ‑A No. 18350 of 2025. The court noted that the order had been served but not complied with, establishing a prima facie case of contempt. However, the court …

AMIT KUMARversusSURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

The applicant Amit Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Surendra Kumar Tiwari, willfully disobeyed a judgment and order dated 09-10-2025 in writ petition No. 14249 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing a notice, …

HARI LALversusDR. GORAKH NATH PATEL DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

Hari Lal filed a civil contempt application against Dr. Gorakh Nath Patel, the District Basic Education Officer. The applicant's counsel, Ram Sagar Yadav, informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the application still warranted adjudication. …

SANJEET YADAVversusSHRI SHAMIM AHMAD ANSARI

The applicant, Sanjeet Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Judicial Officer Shamim Ahmad Ansari, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20‑08‑2025 directing the Special POCSO Judge to expedite trial of Sessions Trial No. 689/2019 (State v. Sanjeet Yadav) under …

AYODHYA PRASAD YADAVversusSUJEET KUMAR DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER

The applicant, Ayodhya Prasad Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a court order dated 19 January 2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 451 of 2026. The court considered the instructions produced, which included a copy of the order dated 10 March 2026 that decided the applicant’s …

JUGANOOversusPANKAJ GUPTA, BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK

The applicant, Juganoo, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent bank, represented by its branch manager, willfully defied a January 20, 2026 order of the Allahabad High Court in Writ‑C No.205 of 2026, which required the applicant to deposit Rs.1,50,000 and stay any recovery action …

SUNIL KUMARversusSRI RAJENDRA PRASAD, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

Sunil Kumar filed a contempt application against Sri Rajendra Prasad, Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 20‑05‑2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 7760 of 2026 (Sunil Kumar (Safai Nayak) vs State of U.P. and others). The court noted that a prima facie case …

SANTARA DEVIversusSMT YOGITA SINGH SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER

The applicant, Santara Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt Yogita Singh, Sub‑Divisional Officer, willfully defied an order dated 04‑Oct‑2024 issued in Writ‑C No. 32451 of 2024. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served but compliance had …

OM VEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSANJAY PRASAD AND ANOTHER

Six Sub‑Inspectors (Om Veer Singh and five others) filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondent, the Additional Chief Secretary (Home), willfully defied a High Court order dated 2 December 2025 which directed the Deputy Inspector General of Police to decide their claim for an additional …

BALDEVversusSRI ARPIT UPADHYAY

The applicant, Baldev, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of an order dated 20‑02‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 2584 of 2026. The High Court heard the matter without giving notice to the opposite party, where counsel Munna Pandey produced an order dated 28‑09‑2026 concerning the …

MAIYADEENversusSRI ARPIT UPADHYAY COMMISSIONER

The applicant, Maiyadeen, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a February 20, 2026 order issued in Writ‑A No. 2560 of 2026. The court heard the matter without giving notice to the opposite party, and counsel for the opposite party, Sri Munna Pandey, produced a September 28, 2026 …

GAJNDRA PAL SINGHversusJAIYKARAN YADAV AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gajndra Pal Singh, filed a contempt application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant later moved that the contempt application be withdrawn. The court considered whether a contempt proceeding could be dismissed upon the applicant's request for …

SMT. USHAversusSUSHRI RIDHI PANDEY

Smt. Usha filed a contempt application (civil) against Sushri Ridhi Pandey before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Adeel Ahmad Khan, who informed the Court that the order of the writ Court had been complied with. The Court considered whether the compliance negated …

ARATI DEVIversusMISS. ARCHANA AGNIHOTRI, SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The High Court of Allahabad heard a civil contempt application filed by Arati Devi against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Archana Agnihotri for allegedly refusing to obey an order dated 15‑09‑2025 in Writ‑C No.32065 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the order …

AJITversusMRS. SHRUTI, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Ajit filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate willfully disobeyed an order dated 17‑10‑2025 of the Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Criminal Misc. Case No. 314 of 2023, which directed the release of Ajit's attached property after the appeal period expired. The High Court …

AMIT TYAGIversusSHRI PRATIT SINGH, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL- DADRI AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Tyagi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including the Tehsildar and the NOIDA Authority, had violated the status‑quo order dated 15 Oct 2025 issued in Writ C No. 33691 of 2025, which restrained any further development or alienation of certain land in …

UTTIM CHAUHANversusMISS AKANKSHA MISHRA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Uttim Chauhan, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Akanksha Mishra, failed to comply with a September 8, 2025 order in Writ C No. 31030, which required her to consider the applicant's application. The court noted that instructions had been produced …

PAWAN GIHARversusSMT. ARTI SINGH AND ANOTHER

Pawan Gihar filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents failed to comply with a court order dated 04‑12‑2014 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 and with a Supreme Court directive in Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. An FIR (No. 0159 of 2026) dated 08‑09‑2026 was produced to …

GUDDI DEVIversusSHRI ABHISHEK KUMAR, CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.)/ FAST TRACK COURT

The applicant, Guddi Devi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Shri Abhishek Kumar, failed to comply with a High Court order dated 10 November 2025 under Article 227, which required him to consider the applicant's application. The court examined the instructions produced by …

PRAMOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSHRI DIGVIJAY SINGH

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 21‑04‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 41374 of 2025. The court examined whether the alleged non‑compliance amounted to contempt and whether notice was required before …

AMIT KUMAR OJHAversusSRI RAJEEV KRISHNA AND 4 OTHERS

Amit Kumar Ojha filed a contempt petition in the Allahabad High Court alleging that Sri Rajeev Krishna and four others failed to comply with a Supreme Court order issued in Lalita Kumar v. State of U.P. (AIR 2014 SC 187). The petitioner produced an FIR dated 17 September 2026 to support the …

SANJEET SINGHversusMS. RACHANA SHAH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sanjeet Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, including the Delhi Police, willfully defied the High Court order dated 30 July 2026 which had set aside the cancellation of his candidature and directed that he be allowed to appear in the next stage of the …

MANDAKINI DEVIversusRAJESH KUMAR VERMA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

Mandakini Devi filed a contempt application against Sub Divisional Magistrate Rajesh Kumar Verma for allegedly refusing to comply with the High Court's judgment and order dated 29‑04‑2026 in her writ petition (Writ Petition No. 16087 of 2026). The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy …

SATENDRAversusSRI MANISH KUMAR

Satendra filed a contempt application against Manish Kumar alleging willful defiance of the order dated 25‑03‑2025 passed in Writ‑C No. 8608 of 2025 (Satendra v. State of U.P. & 12 others). The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had not …

RAJEEV KUMAR PANDEYversusT.K. SHIBU

The High Court considered a contempt petition filed in 2026 alleging that the opposite party had recovered Rs.98,560 from the applicant’s salary in violation of a 2009 order restraining such recovery. The petition sought to hold the opposite party in contempt for non‑compliance. The Court examined …

PAWAN KUMARversusNIDHI BANSAL DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION) MEDICAL & HEALTH

Pawan Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that Nidhi Bansal willfully defied the order dated 23 June 2026 in Writ‑A No. 9157 of 2026. The Court required notice to the opposite party, but the applicant’s standing counsel appeared and produced the instructions and a copy of the order dated 23 …

ROOPCHANDversusASHFAQUE ALAM ANSARI, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER SADAR -II

The applicant, Roopchand, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Ashfaque Alam Ansari, willfully defied the order dated 13‑01‑2026 passed in Writ‑B No. 4840 of 2025. The court noted that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had not complied. …

VINITA DEVI AND 38 OTHERSversusMR MUKESH KHARWAR

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 17 September 2025 in Writ‑A No. 13974 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party, but compliance had not been achieved. The court observed that a prima facie …

SMT. RITUversusGEETA CHAUDHARY, DISTICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Ritu, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties, Geeta Chaudhary and another, willfully defied the High Court’s order dated 28‑04‑2026 in Writ (A) No. 6076 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of that order, the opposite …

ASHISH KUMARversusSHRI SAMUEL PAUL N., AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashish Kumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied an order dated 08‑04‑2026 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.1989 of 2025. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served but compliance had not occurred. While …

AJIT CHAUBEYversusSULTAN SINGH

The applicant, Ajit Chaubey, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sultan Singh, willfully defied an order dated 20‑02‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 2547 of 2026. The court examined whether a contempt proceeding should be initiated and whether notice should be issued. While it …

RAJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusRAJ KUMAR GUPTA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed by Raj Kumar Pandey and another against Sub Divisional Magistrate Raj Kumar Gupta for allegedly failing to comply with an order dated 25 March 2026 issued in PIL No. 756 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of the order, …

ASHOK KUMAR PATELversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Patel, filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate and others willfully defied a High Court order dated 6 October 2025 in PIL No.2933 of 2025, which directed the State to remove obstructions, hindrances and illegal encroachments. The court noted that …

RAJKUMARversusHIMANSHU NAGPAL

The applicant, Rajkumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Himanshu Nagpal, willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 08‑04‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13479 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, without issuing a …

MUJEEB MIANversusSHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD

Mujeeb Mian filed a contempt application against Rajendra Prasad alleging willful defiance of a February 19, 2026 order of the Allahabad High Court in Writ‑A No. 22365 of 2018. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied with the writ order. …

SUBASH CHAUHANversusKUNWAR SACHIN SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Subash Chauhan, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied the order dated 09‑06‑2025 in Writ‑C No. 19180 of 2025, which directed them to execute a revenue order dated 07‑07‑2023 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The applicant claimed …

DR RAJARAM SINGHversusABHISHEK SINGH SENIOR ACCOUNT OFFICER AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Rajaram Singh, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Jagdish Singh, later moved the court seeking to withdraw the contempt application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive hearing on the merits of …

RAM CHANDRA YADAVversusBACHCHA RAM AND 9 OTHERS

Ram Chandra Yadav filed a civil contempt application against Bachcha Ram and nine others. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to re‑file. The standing counsel for the respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The …

DHRUWA KANT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusPANKAJ MISHRA

The applicants, Dhruwa Kant Yadav and another, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court seeking enforcement of a Writ Court order. Counsel for the applicants informed the Court that the order had already been complied with by the opposite party. On this basis, the Court found …

KAMNA DEVIversusDILIP KUMAR PANDEY (DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER BANDA)

The applicant, Kamna Devi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Dilip Kumar Pandey, failed to comply with a court order dated 29 January 2026 which required him to consider her application. The court examined the matter and noted that instructions dated 19 August 2026 showed …

BIJENDRA BAHADUR SINGHversusSRI RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, SDO

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Bijendra Bahadur Singh alleging that the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Chunar, had failed to comply with the order dated 19.04.2024 in PIL No. 83 of 2024 directing a spot inspection and demarcation of alleged road encroachments …

VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVversusSANDEEP KAUR AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Virendra Kumar Srivastav alleging willful defiance of its earlier order dated 27 October 2025 (corrected 17 November 2025) in Writ‑A No. 9777 of 2021, which had quashed recovery orders and directed the respondents to refund Rs 2,20,129. The …

DINESH SINGHversusMRS KAVITA MEENA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Dinesh Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate, Mrs. Kavita Meena, failed to comply with a High Court order dated 18 July 2025 in Writ C No. 21926 of 2025, which required consideration of the applicant’s application. The court examined the matter and …

KAPIL KUMARversusSHRI SURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully defied the order dated 03‑09‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 13136 of 2025, which required the appeal to be decided. The court examined the instructions produced, which showed that the appeal had indeed been decided on …

GULZAR AHMADversusSHRI GANESH PRASAD SAHA, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

The applicant, Gulzar Ahmad, filed a contempt application alleging that the Superintendent of Police, Ganesh Prasad Saha, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20 May 2025 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10252 of 2025, which directed the petitioner to move a fresh representation before …

RAJESHversusSMT NIDHI BHARDWAJ, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (SDM) SADAR

Rajesh filed a contempt application against Smt Nidhi Bhardwaj, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 07-08-2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17249 of 2025. The High Court sought instructions on the matter and received them, noting that the …

MAHAVEER SHARMAversusSHRI RAVI KUMAR

Mahaveer Sharma filed a contempt application alleging that Ravi Kumar willfully defied the High Court's order dated 18 July 2025, which directed the Development Authority to pass a reasoned order on the allotment of 4% of acquired land within eight weeks. An affidavit indicated that the claim was …

VIJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSHRI MANISH KUMAR VERMA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Vijay Kumar Srivastava filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate failed to comply with the High Court's order dated 03‑12‑2024 in Writ‑A No. 58950/2009, which directed the petitioner to file a detailed application for his grandfather's freedom‑fighter pension arrears within …

ASHOK KUMARversusSRI RAJEEV KRISHNA AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents failed to comply with a Supreme Court order dated 12 November 2013 in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. The petition was supported by an FIR dated 20 August 2026. The respondent counsel did not contest the facts …

ROHTASH SINGH SHARMAversusSHRI OMKAR SHUKLA

The applicant, Rohtash Singh Sharma, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Shri Omkar Shukla, willfully defied an order dated 03.11.2025 issued in Writ‑A No. 21835 of 2018. The High Court sought instructions on the matter, which were produced and recorded on 18.09.2016. Upon …

PRAKASH SINGH, INSPECTORversusSUKIRTI MADHAV, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Inspector Prakash Singh filed a contempt application alleging that the Superintendent of Police, Pilibhit, willfully defied the Allahabad High Court's order dated 14 January 2026 which set aside his suspension and directed his reinstatement. The Superintendent issued a new order on 15 September 2026 …

NIKHIL KUMARversusSRI JAVED ANSARI, TEHSILDAR- TEHSIL-TAKHA

Nikhil Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that Tehsildar Sri Javed Ansari willfully defied the High Court's order dated 07-11-2025, which directed the Tehsildar to decide a mutation suit within three months. The order, issued in Writ‑C No. 38509 of 2025, warned that non‑compliance would …

KUMAR PAL AND 7 OTHERSversusARUN KUMAR SINGH

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Kumar Pal and others, alleging willful defiance of its earlier order dated 23 March 2026 directing the Special Land Acquisition Officer to process and disburse compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. …

YASEEN KHANversusSRI ALOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a former Commission Amin who retired on 31‑07‑2021, filed a writ seeking payment of outstanding retirement, pension and gratuity dues. The High Court ordered the respondents to clear the remaining Rs 12 lakh within eight weeks and later directed payment within two weeks, rejecting …

GULSHER AHMAD AND 7 OTHERSversusMR. CHANDRA MOHAN GARG AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed by Gulsher Ahmad and others, alleging that the respondents had willfully defied the Court’s order dated 23‑10‑2024 which prohibited demolition of the petitioners’ houses without proper acquisition and statutory compliance. The order in …

MRITYUNJAY PRASAD GUPTAversusSATYENDRA SINGH AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Mrityunjay Prasad Gupta, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied an order dated 12‑12‑2025 issued in Writ‑C No. 43927 of 2025. The court noted that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite parties had not complied. While a …

BABU RAMversusSHRI AVICHAL PRATAP SINGH, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, GHATAMPUR

Babu Ram filed a contempt application against Shri Avichal Pratap Singh, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ghatampur. The applicant's counsel, Manoj Kumar Verma, stated at the Bar that the order of the writ Court had been complied with. The court examined the statement and found no breach of the writ …

AMARNATH UPADHYAYversusSMT SARIKA MOHAN

The applicant, Amarnath Upadhyay, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt Sarika Mohan, failed to comply with the order dated 24-04-2026 issued in Writ A No. 5948/2026 directing her to decide a claim. The court examined the allegation and found a prima facie case of …

MANJU GUPTAversusYADAV S. THAKUR

Manju Gupta filed a contempt application against Yadav S. Thakur alleging willful defiance of an order dated 24 April 2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 5930 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied with the writ court's directions. The High …

HARISHANKAR SHARMAversusPRIYA KUMARI

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of the order dated 1.4.2026 passed in Writ-C No.12392 of 2026 (Harishankar Sharma Vs. State of U.P. And 3 others). The applicant contended that despite service of a certified copy of the writ court order, the opposite party had not …

AZAD KHANversusSAZIDA KHATOON @ SANJEEDA KHATOON AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Azad Khan, filed a contempt application seeking to summon and punish the opposite parties for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17 December 2024 in Civil Misc. Writ‑C No. 35752 of 2024. The applicant later moved to withdraw the contempt application, citing an inherent …

VINOD KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSRI ASOK KUMAR SINGH

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 06‑02‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 1756 of 2026. The order required the opposite party to comply with directions of the writ court, but the applicants claim no compliance has occurred …

SMT. SHEELA DEVIversusSHRI DR. ARUN KUMAR TIWARI, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

The applicant, Smt. Sheela Devi, filed a contempt application against Dr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, the Chief Medical Officer, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment and order dated 28‑10‑2025 in Writ A No. 15749 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy of the order, the …

BRIJESH KUMARversusDIVYANSHI SINGH, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL PHOOLPUR

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 05.12.2025 in Writ Petition (C) No. 42926 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, at this stage, no notice was issued to the opposite party. …

NETRAPAL SINGHversusSRI SHLOK KUMAR, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Netrapal Singh filed a contempt application against Senior Superintendent of Police Shlok Kumar alleging willful non‑compliance with an order dated 04‑02‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 1555/2026 that required the police officer to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but …

BANSHIDHAR TIWARIversusSHRI MOHD AMAN AND ANOTHER

In a civil contempt application (No. 6684 of 2026), the applicant Banshidhar Tiwari alleged that the opposite parties, Shri Mohd Aman and another, had willfully failed to comply with an order dated 24‑04‑2026 issued in PIL No. 1055/2026 directing them to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a …

VIMLESH PATI TRIPATHIversusSHRI MADHUSUDAN HULGI

Vimlesh Pati Tripathi filed a contempt application against Madhusudan Hulgi alleging willful defiance of an order dated 01‑05‑2026 passed in Writ‑C No.16962 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied with the writ court's directions. …

SMT. VIMLA DEVIversusSRI SATENDRA KUMAR MAURYA, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL GOLA

The applicant, Smt. Vimla Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Tehsildar Sri Satendra Kumar Maurya, willfully defied the High Court’s order dated 26‑11‑2024 in Writ‑C No. 38095 of 2024. The court noted that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the …

MOHD SARWARversusDOCTOR BRIJESH KUMAR

The applicant, Mohd Sarwar, filed a contempt application alleging that Dr Brijesh Kumar willfully defied the order dated 24 April 2026 issued by this Court in PIL No. 1046 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had not complied with …

LAL SAHAB AND ANOTHERversusSHRI S.K, MADHUKAR

Lal Sahab and another filed a contempt application alleging that S.K. Madhukar failed to comply with an order dated 02.02.2026 in Writ‑A No. 19789/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted a prima facie case of willful disobedience but refrained from issuing a notice …

ANMOL RATANversusSRI SALEEM SAI TEJA, NAGAR AYUKTA

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 17 July 2026 in PIL No. 1515/2026, which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The court examined the allegation and found that a prima facie case of willful disobedience …

ANIRUDDH KUMAR SINGH AND 19 OTHERSversusPARTH SARTHI SEN SHARMA AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied several orders dated 13 January, 19 January, 20 January and 17 February 2026 in Writ‑A No.179 of 2026. The opposite parties submitted an affidavit of compliance on 9 September 2026, stating that the …

IBNE HARABversusSURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

Ibne Harab filed a contempt petition alleging that Surendra Kumar Tiwari failed to comply with the order dated 25 July 2025 in Writ A No. 10085 of 2025, which required the opposite party to consider the applicant’s application. The opposite party produced an order dated 2 May 2026 deciding the …

INDRAJEET PANDEYversusMR. MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA, DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

Indrajeet Pandey filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Inspector of Schools, Ballia, had unlawfully withheld his salary for the period February 2011 to July 2014 despite a prior High Court order directing payment. The High Court had earlier quashed an order dated 3.11.1999 for …

PANKAJ KUMARversusSNIGDHA SHARMA

The applicant, Pankaj Kumar, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6529 of 2026) alleging that the respondent, Snigdha Sharma, failed to comply with an order dated 07‑01‑2025 in HMA Petition No. 529 of 2024. The applicant, through counsel Samar Bahadur Harijan, later filed a supplementary …

GULAB CHANDRAversusRAVINDRA KUMAR

The applicant, Gulab Chandra, filed a contempt application alleging that the order of the Writ Court (Writ‑C No. 68719 of 2024) had been complied with when a subsequent order was passed on 01‑09‑2026. Counsel for the applicant, Mangal Rai, stated this compliance at the Bar. The High Court noted the …

MOHD ZAVEDversusSRI ABHISHEK, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

The applicant, Mohd Zaved, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Superintendent of Police, Sri Abhishek, failed to comply with an order dated 06‑02‑2026 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2024 of 2026, which required the police officer to consider the applicant’s application. The court …

SMT. SHAKUNTLA SINGHversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Smt. Shakuntla Singh filed a contempt petition against the District Magistrate alleging failure to comply with the order dated 31.05.2022 passed in Writ A No. 18331 of 2022, which required the magistrate to consider her application. The magistrate produced, for the first time, a copy of an order …

PUTTI LALversusSHRI SANJAY PRASAD AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Putti Lal, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, Shri Sanjay Prasad and another, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20‑11‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 17493 of 2025, which required the training period of police constables to be counted for promotional pay scale …

BALVIR SINGHversusANIL KUMAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NALKOOP DIVISION

Balvir Singh filed a contempt application against Anil Kumar, Executive Engineer, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 10‑02‑2026 in WRIT‑A No. 19725 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing a notice, it granted the opposite party two …

SUDHIR KUMAR SINGHversusBHARTIYA MEENA

The applicant, Sudhir Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Bhartiya Meena, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 21 May 2026 in Writ‑C No.42933 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy of the order, the opposite …

CHANDRABHUSHAN SINGHversusYOGENDRA KUMAR PANDEY, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL- BADALAPUR

The applicant, Chandrabhushan Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Tehsildar Yogendra Kumar Pandey, failed to comply with an order dated 27 April 2026 issued in PIL No. 1063 of 2026. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no action was taken. …

SMT MADHU RANIversusSHRI ANIL BHUSHAN CHATURVEDI

Madhu Rani, a teacher at the same Montessori school, filed a contempt application alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Director of Education had failed to comply with the 16 November 1998 order granting full salary and benefits to teaching and non‑teaching staff of private recognised …

SHANKAR LALversusINDRAJEET SINGH AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Shankar Lal, filed a contempt application alleging that he willfully defied a status‑quo order dated 12 September 2024, which had stayed the decree of the Board of Revenue and directed both parties to maintain possession of the suit property. The order required the parties to refrain …

RAJKUMARversusSRI RAVI KUMAR NG, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Rajkumar filed a contempt application against Sri Ravi Kumar Ng, CEO, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 12 May 2026 in writ petition C No. 17544 of 2026. The High Court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but declined to issue notice at this stage. Instead, the Court …

SMT NOOR JAHANversusMR MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Noor Jahan, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties wilfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 30.03.2026 in Writ Petition No. 3803 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, at this stage, no notice was issued to the …

MOHIT KUMARversusMR. VIKAS KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 16 June 2026 issued in Writ C No. 23905/2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no compliance had …

RITA DEVIversusSHRI MAHENDRA SINGH TANWAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KUSHINAGAR

Rita Devi filed a contempt application against District Magistrate Mahendra Singh Tanwar alleging willful non‑compliance with an order dated 03‑07‑2026 issued in Writ‑C No. 22586/2026 directing the magistrate to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but the …

SIMPU DEVIversusSHRI MAHENDRA SINGH TANWAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate failed to comply with an order dated 06‑07‑2026 issued in Writ‑C No. 22936/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to …

SMT ANEETA SINGHversusSHRI PAWAN KUMAR GANGWAR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Smt. Aneeta Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Shri Pawan Kumar Gangwar, District Magistrate, had failed to comply with an order dated 13-08-2026 issued in Writ C No. 24016/2026 directing him to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of …

NISHA DEVIversusMR. RAJESH KUMAR PAL

Nisha Devi filed a contempt application against Rajesh Kumar Pal for allegedly refusing to comply with the judgment and order dated 25‑02‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 35370 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy of the order, the opposite party had not acted on it. …

RAJESH KUMARversusSHRI S RAJALINGAM DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER

Rajesh Kumar filed a contempt application against the Divisional Commissioner alleging willful non‑compliance of an order dated 06‑08‑2025 passed in an application under Section 529. The applicant claimed that despite service of the order, the opposite party had not complied. The court observed that …

SHRI NARAYANversusVIKAS YADAV, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Shri Narayan filed a contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Vikas Yadav alleging failure to comply with the order dated 27‑02‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 3066 of 2026. The court noted that a copy of the order had been served but the respondent had not acted on it, establishing a prima …

DHARMENDRA KUMARversusSHRI DEVASHISH JANA, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Divisional Forest Officer Shri Devashish Jana, failed to comply with an order dated 20 May 2026 issued in Writ A No. 7654 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed …

YOGENDRA SINGHversusSRI DEVASHISH JANA, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Yogendra Singh filed a contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Devashish Jana alleging willful non‑compliance of an order dated 20‑05‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 7661 of 2026. The Court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but refrained from issuing a notice at this stage. …