Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VIKAS BUDHWAR

583 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

SMT. CHANDRA KALA TRIPATHIversusVIJAY SHANKAR SINGH, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER

Smt. Chandra Kala Tripathi filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that, on the client’s instructions, the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the application should continue in …

PRAMOD KUMAR JHAversusMEGHA ROOPAM

The applicant, Pramod Kumar Jha, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court alleging non‑compliance with a writ‑court order. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the order had been fully complied with as per the client’s instructions. The court found that no ground for …

SWAMI RAM SRIVASTAVAversusSHRI S. RAJLINGAM, D.M.

The applicant, Swami Ram Srivastava, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of an order dated 26‑08‑2022 (corrected 01‑09‑2022) issued in Writ‑C No. 24301 of 2022, which directed the respondent District Magistrate to decide a claim for ex‑gratia compensation for the applicant’s son …

RAKESH @ PREM SAGARversusUMESH YADAV

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Rakesh @ Prem Sagar alleging that the respondent, Umesh Yadav, wilfully defied the Court’s order dated 16 January 2026 directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Etawah, to decide a pending 6C application in suit no. 193 of …

VIVEK YADAVversusSHRI SURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI, SECRETARY, BASIC EDUCATION BOARD

Vivek Yadav filed a contempt application against Surendra Kumar Tiwari, Secretary of the Basic Education Board, alleging that the Board failed to comply with the order dated 25‑05‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 8070/2026 which required it to decide a claim. The High Court noted a prima facie case of willful …

SUMAN KUMARIversusSATENDRA KUMAR,DISTRICT BASIK EDUCATION OFFICER

Dismissed on merits

The applicant, Suman Kumari, filed a contempt application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against Satendra Kumar, the District Basik Education Officer. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Harish Chandra Pratap, informed the court that the contempt application had become …

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD AONVLA AND ANOTHERversusANUJ KUMAR JHA

The Nagar Palika Parishad, Aonvla filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Anuj Kumar Jha, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 01.12.2025 in Writ‑C No. 411 of 2020, which directed the release of 2% additional stamp duty to the local body. The court had previously ordered …

NAND LAL AND ANOTHERversusSHIV NARAYAN THE CHAIR PERSON DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE

The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Nand Lal and another, alleging that the District Level Committee willfully defied the order dated 5 December 2022 in Writ‑C No. 33717/2022, which required the petitioners to make a representation before the Collector and for the Collector to …

VIJAY SINGH NAGARversusMRS. GEETA CHAUDHARY, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

Vijay Singh Nagar filed a contempt application against Mrs. Geeta Chaudhary, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 11‑03‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 57124 of 2017 (Mool Chand Sharma v. State of U.P. & 4 others). The applicant claimed the order was served but not complied with. The court observed …

KSHITIJ GUPTAversusDHARAMRAJ RAM

The Writ Court had issued an order on 02.02.2026 in Writ‑C No. 3748 of 2026 directing the removal of an encroachment. The applicant, Kshitij Gupta, filed a contempt application alleging non‑compliance of that order. The applicant’s counsel, Mohit Verma, submitted a compliance affidavit stating that …

BALARAJversusSRI RAVI KUMAR NG

The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed by Balaraj alleging that Sri Ravi Kumar Ng, the Development Authority, willfully defied a July 30, 2025 order directing the Authority to pass a reasoned order on a petition for a 10% residential plot. The original order required the …

JYOTI AGARWALversusSHRI SURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

Jyoti Agarwal filed a contempt application alleging that the Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., failed to comply with the High Court's order dated 10 September 2025 directing a decision on her absorption as an Assistant Teacher within two months. The order had permitted consideration of her …

ANITA YADAVversusDR. NANHKU RAM, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

Anita Yadav filed a contempt application alleging that Dr. Nanhku Ram, the Chief Medical Officer, willfully defied an order dated 21 November 2025 in Writ (A) No. 17599 of 2025, which required the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation and related documents before the Chief Medical …

DR HARSHVARDHAN SHARMAversusDR NARAYAN DAS

Dr Harshvardhan Sharma filed a contempt application alleging that Dr Narayan Das willfully defied the High Court's order dated 26‑11‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 17841, which required the petitioner to file a representation before the Director of Ayurveda Department by 12‑12‑2025 and for the department to …

SHIVSWAROOP SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHERversusSHRI SHYAM DHANI PAL

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent had willfully defied the High Court's order dated 30‑10‑2025, which directed the Consolidation Officer to decide objections under section 9A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Housing Societies Act within three months. The …

ARVIND KUMARversusSMT ARTI SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Arvind Kumar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, Smt Arti Singh and another, failed to comply with an order issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others). The court noted that an FIR (No. 0210 of …

BHUAI LAL PALversusSRI SEELAM SAI TEJA NAGAR AYUKTA, NAGAR NIGAM

The applicant Bhuai Lal Pal filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against the Nagar Nigam. Counsel for the applicant stated at the bar that the order of the writ court should be complied with. The court examined whether this statement amounted to contempt of court. Finding …

MAHENDRA SINGH AND 17 OTHERSversusCHANDNI SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

Mahendra Singh and 17 others filed a contempt petition against Chandni Singh and 2 others alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with the order dated 23 February 2026 in Writ C No. 41482 of 2025, which required them to consider the applicants' application. The court produced instructions …

SUNIL KUMAR PALversusSHRI MANISH KUMAR VERMA

The applicant, Sunil Kumar Pal, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Shri Manish Kumar Verma, failed to comply with a court order dated 30 October 2026 in Writ C No. 37323 of 2025, which required the opposite party to consider the applicant's application. The court noted that …

SURAJPAL SINGHversusATUL VATS, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Surajpal Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate, Atul Vats, failed to comply with an order dated 18 February 2026 issued in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 27316 of 2025, which required the magistrate to consider the applicant's application. The court …

DHIRENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYversusBHUPENDRA SINGH DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party had failed to comply with the order dated 29‑01‑2026 in Writ‑A No.1092 of 2026, which required consideration of the applicant's claim. The court examined the instructions produced, which showed an order dated 05‑09‑2026 …

SHIV ANANDversusARVIND KUMAR CHAUHAN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Shiv Anand, filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate, Arvind Kumar Chauhan, failed to comply with the order dated 10 March 2026 in Writ‑A No. 3279 of 2026, which required the magistrate to consider the applicant's application. The High Court examined the …

MAHENDRA PRASADversusSANJAY DUBEY AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 24‑11‑2025 directing the removal of an illegal encroachment on public utility land, an order that had been issued in a public interest litigation (P.I.L.) and upheld on appeal under Section 67 of the …

SMT SUMAYLAversusANKITA SHARMA, SENIOR SUPERINTENDETN OF POLICE, AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Sumayla, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Senior Superintendent of Police Ankita Sharma, had failed to comply with a writ order dated 04.12.2014 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano v. State of U.P.). The learned counsel for the …

LAXMI KANT SINGHversusSHRI RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, PHOOLPUR

Laxmi Kant Singh filed a contempt application against Rajeev Kumar Singh, a Consolidation Officer, alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 06‑12‑2024 in Writ B No.4286 of 2024. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served but the opposite party had not complied. …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSMT. ARTI SINGH AND ANOTHER

Devendra Singh filed a contempt application alleging that Smt. Arti Singh and another willfully defied the order dated 04-12-2014 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano v. State of U.P.). The court was shown instructions dated 05-09-2026 along with FIR No. 0164 of 2026, …

M/S PARAMHANS FURNITURES PVT. LTD.versusANIL KUMAR SHARMA, REGIONAL MANAGER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by M/s Paramhans Furnitures Pvt. Ltd. against Anil Kumar Sharma for alleged willful disobedience of a judgment dated 17‑02‑2026. The applicant’s counsel produced an order of the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Dy. …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSHRI MISHRI LAL, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar and others, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of an order dated 20‑Nov‑2025 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 25573 of 2025, which directed them to reply to a demolition notice within four weeks and barred coercive action for three months. …

MAHESH PRASAD MISHRA (RETIRED LECTURER)versusRAKESH KUMAR

The applicant, Mahesh Prasad Mishra, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Rakesh Kumar, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s judgment and order dated 16‑10‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 10841 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing …

DEVANTIversusKUNWAR SACHIN SINGH

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with the order dated 18‑02‑2026 (as corrected on 26‑02‑2026) in Writ C No. 6582/2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a copy of the order had been served but …

CHETAN ANAND BHARTIversusSRI DR. CHANDRA BHUSHAN MANAGING DIRECTOR

The applicant, Chetan Anand Bharti, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Dr. Chandra Bhushan, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment dated 10 December 2025 in Writ‑A No.18610 of 2025. The order required the opposite party to comply with certain directions, which, …

KAILASH NATHversusSHAILESH KUMAR PANDEY SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATION

Kailash Nath filed a contempt application against Shailesh Kumar Pandey, the Settlement Officer, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 22 April 2026 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1720 of 2025. The High Court noted that a certified copy of the writ order had been served but remained …

MOHD DILSHAD HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSRI SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH

The applicants, sons of the original writ petitioner, sought contempt relief alleging that the opposite party’s notice to remove encroachments on Gata No. 383 violated a stay order protecting their possession of Plot No. 382. The stay order dated 16‑04‑2025 restrained respondents from dispossessing …

NASIRULLAHversusHIMANSHU VERMA

The applicant, Nasirullah, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with a High Court order dated 30 July 2024, which dismissed a revision against an interlocutory order in proceedings under Section 128 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The original order …

SARVAR ALIversusNARENDRA SINGH TAHSILDAR CAMPAIERGANJ

Sarvar Ali filed a contempt application against Narendra Singh, a Tahsildar, alleging that the order dated 25 September 2024 in PIL No. 1903 of 2024 directing the opposite party to decide a claim had not been complied with. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but …

DHIRENDRA YADAVversusMR GAURANG RATHI

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 19-11-2025 in Writ-C No.22417 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case existed for contempt but, instead of issuing notice, it granted the opposite party an additional …

BABURAMversusSRI HIMANSHU AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Baburam, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant later sought to withdraw the application, citing an inherent defect in the pleading. The applicant also requested liberty to file a fresh contempt application if necessary. The Court …

MAHESH SINGH @ MAHESH SINGH YADAVversusSHRI MANOJ KUMAR DWIVEDI

The applicant Mahesh Singh filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a 19 April 2007 order in a writ petition concerning his ad‑hoc appointment as a teacher and the illegal appointment of the headmaster's sons. The respondent institution contested the authenticity of appointment …

SHREECHAND YADAVversusMR. RAJESH ARYA

Shreechand Yadav filed a contempt application alleging that Rajesh Arya failed to comply with an order dated 18 May 2026 issued in Writ A No. 8397/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to issue …

RAM ASHISHversusANKUR VERMA SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Ram Ashish against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Ankur Verma for allegedly failing to comply with the order dated 08‑06‑2026 in PIL No. 1481 of 2026, which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant asserted that a …

SAMALIYAversusMANISH BANSAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE / COLLECTOR AGRA

The applicant, Samaliya, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate/Collector, Manish Bansal, alleging willful defiance of a High Court order dated 29‑04‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 6147 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party …

VISHAL SINGHversusSRI HITESH AGRAWAL

The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Vishal Singh alleging that Sri Hitesh Agrawal had willfully defied an order dated 12 April 2024 issued in an Article 227 proceeding. The 2024 order directed the trial court to publish a notice in a scheduled newspaper and to proceed with the …

ARUN KUMAR SAINIversusSANTOSH KUMAR

Arun Kumar Saini filed a contempt application against Santosh Kumar for allegedly refusing to comply with the judgment and order dated 14‑11‑2025 in Writ A No. 16979 of 2025. The applicant claimed that a certified copy of the order had been served but the opposite party had not acted on it. The …

SHRI SHAQIBversusSHRI SANJAY KUMAR MEENA, CHIEF EXEUTIVE OFFICER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 28‑01‑2026 in Writ‑C No. 2800 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, consistent with procedural law, it did not issue a notice …

MAHARAJIYAversusAMARNATH AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Maharajiya, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 6119 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to file a fresh application. The standing counsel …

MAHESH KUMAR TIWARIversusCHANDRA PRAKASH BAJPAYEE, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SADAR

The applicant, Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Consolidation Officer Chandra Prakash Bajpayee, willfully failed to comply with the High Court’s judgment and order dated 09‑05‑2023 in Writ‑B No.1813 of 2023. The applicant claimed that despite being …

INDRAPALversusNEERAJ GOYAL AND 6 OTHERS

Indrapal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against Neeraj Goyal and six others. The petitioner sought relief, but the learned counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because the matter was already decided under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC. The respondents' counsel …

HIMANSHU SINGHversusRASHMI SINGH

The petitioners Himanshu Singh and Rashmi Singh were married on 24‑11‑2024 but lived separately. The petitioner sought a waiver of the six‑month cooling period prescribed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act for filing a dissolution suit, but the Family Court rejected the waiver on …

MEERA DEVIversusRAJENDRA YADAV

The petitioner Meera Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Suit No. 303 of 2014 (Mangla Yadav v. Ramkrit Yadav) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Chandauli be decided within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending …

ISLAM AND ANOTHERversusBUDDHU SHAHI AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Bansgaon, Gorakhpur, to decide the pending case of Islam Vs. Buddhu Shahi (Case No. 470 of 2020) within a stipulated period. The petition sought expeditious disposal of that case. The High Court …

MOOL CHANDRA PATELversusSANJAY SINGH

The petitioner, Mool Chandra Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki, Prayagraj, to decide and conclude the pending Original Suit No. 571 of 2021 against Sanjay Singh within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the …

SMT. SUNEETA DEVIversusRAM BHAWAN YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Suneeta Devi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Allahabad to decide an application filed on 17‑10‑2022 under Order 39 Rule‑1 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 742/2022. The petitioner argued that the application should be decided expeditiously. The …

BIRAM SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusMOHD ANIS AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners, Biram Singh and others, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the judgment and order dated 25 March 2026 passed by the Additional District Judge, Saharanpur, in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 198/2025. Their counsel, Ram Prakash, sought to withdraw the petition on the ground that …

SMT SONIYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Soniya, filed a writ petition after the Railway Claims Tribunal, Allahabad awarded them Rs 8 lakhs as compensation for the death of the petitioner’s son in a railway accident, releasing only 10% of the amount and directing the balance to be deposited. They sought a direction …

JAGDISH YADAVversusSMT. CHHAYA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagdish Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide Misc. Case No. 2 of 2026 concerning compliance with a temporary injunction dated 19 March 2021, issued in the original suit of …

M/S COSMOS INTERNATIONALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Cosmos International, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's supervisory intervention to compel the respondent MSEFC, Meerut, to conclude arbitration proceedings (Reference No. 09/2024) and pass a final award without further adjournments. The petition also …

AMAR SINGH DHANGARversusSHANTI DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Amar Singh Dhangar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Etawah to finally decide a pending declaratory suit (O.S. No. 466 of 2014) against the respondents. The petitioner argued that the suit should be expedited. The …

URMILA DEVIversusBHANU PRATAP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Urmila Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide Suit No. 1601 of 2022 (Bhanu Pratap v. Urmila and another) under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner argued that the suit should be …

SHASHIKANT RAMADHAR PANDEYversusSMT DULRI DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shashikant Ramadhar Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.3, Varanasi, to consider and decide Original Suit No. 1538 of 2013 (Pandey v. Dulri Devi & others) within a stipulated time. The …

VINAY KUMAR GOSWAMI AND 4 OTHERSversusVINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.5, Mathura, to decide Application 6‑C for a temporary injunction in Original Suit No.228 of 2012 expeditiously, preferably within eight months. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and …

AKASH CHAURASIYAversusSHIV KUMAR OJHA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Akash Chaurasiya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Purvi, Ballia, to decide a 6‑C2 application filed in suit O.S. No. 376 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the application should be decided expeditiously. The High Court noted …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGHversusAAYUSHI SINGH

The petitioner, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to decide the pending divorce suit (Case No. 1101 of 2024) filed by the respondent, Aayushi Singh, under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage …

MUNNI DEVIversusUMA DEVI

The petitioner, Munni Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Deoria, to decide the pending civil suit (Original Suit No. 1606 of 2023, Uma Devi v. Munni Devi) within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s counsel urged …

LEELAWATIversusKANHAIYA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Leelawati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to dispose of her original suit No. 257 of 2010 against Kanhaiya and two others. The petition sought an order for early disposal within a period prescribed by the High …

RAMVIRversusRAJENDRA KUMAR

The petitioner, Ramvir, challenged a lower‑court injunction order passed in an original suit filed by the respondents, Rajendra Kumar. The petitioner filed an application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to set aside or modify the injunction, and subsequently …

VINODversusBISHAN KUMAR (DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERS

Vinod filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Civil Judge‑I, Bulandshahr, to decide original suit No. 489 of 2016 (Vinod v. Bishan Kumar) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the pending suit required prompt adjudication and that the writ petition should compel the …

SMT. RASHMIversusSRI RUKAM PAL SINGH

Petitioner Smt. Rashmi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Shikohabad, Firozabad, to decide a 6C‑2 application filed in Original Suit No. 308 of 2024 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner argued that the application should be decided …

SUJIT KUMARversusDEORIA SUGAR MILLS LIMITED AND 5 OTHERS

Sujit Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No. 10, Deoria, to decide restoration application No. 439/2020, which is pending in Misc. Suit No. 60/2020. The petitioner argued that the lower court should be compelled to decide the matter …

DINESH CHANDRA @ DINESH GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 17‑04‑2026 passed by the Additional District Judge, F.T.C‑I, Hathras, and a mandamus to stay the proceedings in L.A. No.1/2016 pending before that judge until the disposal of First Appeal No.1163/2025 …

AAKANSHA PALversusLAXMI SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aakansha Pal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.1, Fatehpur, to decide O.S. No.639 of 2018 against Laxmi Singh and others expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending for an undue period …

CHUNNI LALversusPATESHVAR AND 32 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chunni Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gorakhpur, to decide Suit No. 1036 of 2013 (Parmeshwar & Others v. Govind & Others) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without any …

SMT. RAVINA KHATOONversusMANOJ KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Ravina Khatoon, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Gorakhpur to expedite the pending suit O.S.No.218 of 2022 (Ravina Khatoon v. Manoj Kumar & others). The sole relief claimed was that the lower court decide …

MOHAMMAD SHAMS ALAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSHAUKAT ALI AND 24 OTHERS

The petitioners, decree‑holders, filed a petition under Article 227 alleging that despite a decree in their favour, the execution of the decree in Execution Case No. 21 of 2025 (Shams Alam v. Shaukat Ali) was being unduly delayed. They pointed to a Supreme Court judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusRAMDHAN AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Additional Civil Judge, New Court, 4th Jaunpur, to expedite the pending Execution Case No. 6/2024 (Rajendra Vs. Praveen Singh). The petition solely requested that the lower court decide the …

JWALA PRASAD CHAUDHARI AND ANOTHERversusSETH PRASAD

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) West Ballia decide Suit No.6 of 2020 (Jwala Prasad v. Setu Prasad) within a stipulated time. The petition argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious disposal. The High …

SANDEEP KUMAR SINGHversusSMT. SAKSHI NIGAM

Petitioner Sandeep Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to decide his matrimonial case (No. 901 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner urged that the case be decided …

RAMCHANDRAversusPARASHURAM AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ballia, to decide a restoration application (No. 01 of 2019) filed in Original Suit No. 91 of 2009. The petition alleged that the civil judge had not yet ruled on the …

SHAHI KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSHUBHAM SINGHAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Shahi Khan and others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Rampur, to decide the stay application in Original Suit No. 39 of 2026 as early as possible. The petition sought expeditious disposal of the stay application and …

SHRI MOHD HAFIJversusSARFARAZ AHMAD AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Hafij, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Chandauli to decide a pending review application (No. M-52 of 2024) in case 468/1995. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious decision. The Court observed that since the …

ASHOK TIWARIversusSANTOSH KUMAR KESHARI AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashok Tiwari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the 6c application filed in his civil suit (No. 1589 of 2024) be decided promptly. The petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Ashish Srivastava representing the …

SHATRUGHAN MAURYAversusCHANDAN AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shatrughan Maurya, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a 6C application filed on 15 May 2024 in Original Suit No. 328 of 2024. The High Court had earlier, on 6 February 2025, ordered the lower court to decide …

PRADEEP AND 4 OTHERSversusASHOK KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.)‑18, Deoria, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code in Original Suit No. 85 of 2023 (Ashok v. Pradeep). The petition argued that the suit was pending and …

RAM EKAM AND ANOTHERversusRAJ KISHOR

The petitioners, Ram Ekam and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) of Court No.10, Deoria, to decide Original Suit No. 1282 of 2017 against Raj Kishor within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without …

SARITA SINGHversusDURGAWATI DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sarita Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Varanasi to expedite the pending Suit No. 630 of 2020, which has been in litigation since the year 2000. The petitioner argued that the suit required an …

SHRI KRISHNA JANAMSTHAN SEWA SANSTHANversusPOORAN SINGH RAGHAV AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Krishna Janamsthan Sewa Sansthan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Essential Commodities Act Court No. 10, Mathura, to expedite the disposal of pending restoration applications (Nos. 122 of 2025 and 324 of 2024) and a …

VINOD KUMARversusRAMESH MISHRA AND 5 OTHERS

Vinod Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), 7th District Jaunpur to decide Original Suit No. 242/2024 and a pending C‑application that have been pending since 28‑02‑2024. The petitioner requested that the lower court …

OMKAR NATH TIWARIversusAVANISH TIWARI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Omkar Nath Tiwari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), City, Jaunpur, to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 463 of 2025 against the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the pending suit be decided …

DAYA SHANKAR DUBEYversusKRISHNA MOHAN TIWARI AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Daya Shankar Dubey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.10, Deoria to decide the pending civil suit (Case No. 78 of 2020) against him within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the lower court had delayed the …

DINESH KUMARversusSMT. REKHA

Petitioner Dinesh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Family Court in Saharanpur to decide his pending case (No. 23/2019) against Smt. Rekha expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the delay in the family court case warranted higher court intervention. The …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vinay Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Allahabad, to decide the pending Claim Petition No. 725 of 2014 within a reasonable time. The petitioner argued that the claim had been pending for an undue period and required expeditious …

VIJAYPAL SINGHversusHARPAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Vijaypal Singh filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against respondents Harpal Singh and others. The petition was presented before Hon'ble Justice Vikas Budhwar. Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Usha Kiran, requested to …

TETARI DEVIversusSMT. SANKESA DEVI AND 6 OTHERS

Tetari Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the IInd‑Additional Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kasia, to decide Miscellaneous Case No.217 of 2020, which arises from Original Suit No.174 of 2002 and is pending under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC. The petitioner argued that …

GAURI SHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusBHAGIRATHI AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahar, Jaunpur to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No.22 of 2025 (Bhagirathi & others v. Gaurishankar) and to decide a temporary injunction application filed on 07.01.2025. The …

PREMCHAND @ PREMversusUMARAO AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Premchand @ Prem, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur, to decide the pending suit No. 583 of 2016 against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit concerning a registered sale deed of land in …

BALRAM JI GUPTAversusRAM JI GUPTA

The petitioner, Balram Ji Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj, to decide Suit No.324 of 2004 (Ram Ji Gupta v. Shankar Lal Gupta and others) which has been pending since April 2004. The petitioner’s counsel requested an …

ZAHID AHMEDversusGYANWATI

The petitioner, Zahid Ahmed, challenged an injunction restraining him from creating third‑party rights over a property that was the subject of a sale deed executed on 23‑03‑2024. The sale consideration was Rs.6 lakh, but a cheque issued by the petitioner was dishonoured and he alleges he has already …

SHIV ACHALversusHINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD AND 3 OTHERS

Shiv Achal, claiming ownership of a 0.24‑hectare plot in Jokahi village, challenged a decree passed in 2013 that declared Hindalco Industries and others as owners. An appeal filed in 2014 was dismissed for non‑appearance on 20 September 2023, and his subsequent application under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC …

SHRIKANT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusRAM LALIT AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Shrikant Yadav and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to set aside a judgment and decree dated 19‑10‑2015 of the MACT/ADJ Court, Gorakhpur, which had rejected their application under CPC Rule 13 to vacate an ex parte order in case 565 of 1997. …

AMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amar Singh, filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 38999 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Saurabh Singh, requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, dismissed the writ …

SMT. ADLENE MASSEY AND 2 OTHERSversusMANISH DAS AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 challenged the lower court’s order rejecting an application for a hand‑writing expert report on a 2001 unregistered will that formed the basis of an earlier suit. The petitioners argued that the appellate court could still order such expert evidence under Section 45 of …

UDHAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (J.D.), City, Farrukhabad to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in Original Suit No. 531 of 2025 and to maintain status quo over the disputed property. The High Court noted that the underlying suit was already pending and …

MUKESHA DEVIversusRAJENDRA AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesha Devi, claimed ownership of a 41.85 sq. meter plot in Kasganj district, alleging that the respondents were obstructing her possession after she purchased the land by a registered sale deed dated 08-12-2023. She obtained a temporary injunction from the Civil Judge, Senior …

SHAMA MASOODversusZAFAR KHAN AND 6 OTHERS

Shama Masood filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside earlier orders dated 12‑02‑2019 and 09‑09‑2025, to obtain permission to repair a gate and wall, and to have two related suits either dismissed or expedited. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner withdrew the challenge to …

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusOM PRAKASH

The Kanpur Development Authority filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition on the ground of an inherent defect, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, …

RAJENDRA PRASADversusYAAR MOHAMMAD AND 4 OTHERS

Rajendra Prasad filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 seeking relief against Yaar Mohammad and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Chandan Sharma, moved the Court to withdraw the petition. The learned Standing Counsel expressed no objection to …

SHIVANAND BISWASH AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Shivanand Biswash and another, sought full release of a compensation award of Rs.8,00,000 granted by a tribunal on 26-11-2025 after their son died in a railway accident. The tribunal had ordered that only 10% be released immediately, with the remaining 90% to be placed in a fixed …

KOMALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Komal, suffered a severe railway accident on 27‑06‑2023 resulting in permanent disability and obtained a compensation award of Rs 4,00,000 with interest from the Railway Claims Tribunal on 18‑07‑2025. The Tribunal ordered that only 10% of the amount be released immediately while the …

MOOL CHANDRA @ BHOOLEversusSONU AND ANOTHER

Mool Chandra (Petitioner) filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Ghaziabad to decide Application No. 6G(2) under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, along with Original Suit No. 1338 of 2023, within a …

RAMPHER AND ANOTHERversusRAMKHELAWAN

The petitioners sought interim protection against a sale deed prepared by the executing court after a decree in Civil Suit No. 41 of 1987. Their objection under Section 47 of the CPC to the execution was rejected, leading them to file a revision, which was entertained but only notices were issued …

SHRI JAGPAL SINGHversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Shri Jagpal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (South), Meerut, to release Rs. 4,00,000 that had been fixed and deposited by the Tribunal in Motor Accident Claim No. 99 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the Tribunal should be compelled …

ATUL SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusMR. MANOJ AHUJA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the lower court hear and decide a pending injunction suit (Misc. Case No. Nil of 2019) filed under Section 1992 of the CPC, alleging that no case number had been allotted. The High Court examined the petition and, noting the absence of a …

SANJAY KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusDINESH AGARWAL AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar and seven others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court against Dinesh Agarwal and three others. The petition was being heard in Court No. 5 before Hon’ble Justice Vikas Budhwar. Counsel for the petitioners, Ashok …

R.K. ENGINEERING WORKSversusRAJESH KUMAR DUBEY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, R.K. Engineering Works, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Varanasi to expedite the pending suit O.S. No. 1065/2023 against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit was unduly delayed and requested the High Court to …

VIVEK DUAversusSMT PUJA DUA

Vivek Dua filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Family Court, Court No.3, Allahabad, to decide his pending matrimonial suit (Case No.1012 of 2022) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the suit should be decided expeditiously. The court …

TEJRAMversusJAGDISH AND 2 OTHERS

The petition under Article 227 was filed by Tejram against Jagdish and two others in the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Shiv Ram Dubey, sought to withdraw the petition, stating that appropriate proceedings would be taken in the proper forum. The respondents' counsel raised no …

TRIBHUWAN SINGHversusSRI ASHISH KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Tribhuwan Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Bidhuna, District Auraiya, to decide his original suit No. 91 of 2022 against Ashish Kumar and another within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit …

SMT. ABHA SRIVASTAVAversusASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Abha Srivastava filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City Court No.4, Varanasi, to expedite the disposal of Application 39 (Rule 1,2) in Original Suit No. 3380 of 2023 pending before that court. The petitioner …

SMT SADHNA SHUKLAversusBHAGWAN SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt Sadhna Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide her pending Original Suit No. 51 of 2023 against Bhagwan Singh and another within a stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …

SMT LAXMI PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT VANDANA PANDEY AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide the pending Succession Case No. 124170 of 2017 expeditiously. The High Court noted that the suit was still pending and that keeping the writ petition alive would …

SHAHEED MUHAMMADversusSMT. RUBINA KHAN AND ANOTHER

Shaheed Muhammad filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against Smt. Rubina Khan and another. The petitioner’s counsel, Arun Kumar Soni, requested to withdraw the petition, stating that appropriate proceedings would be pursued in another forum. The respondents’ counsel raised no …

SANJAY SAGAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSMT. SUDHA SAGAR AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sanjay Sagar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the commencement of execution proceedings against them, while a Second Appeal (No. 1176 of 2010) was pending before the court. The respondents, Smt. Sudha Sagar and others, sought to continue with the …

SMT NAIMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Naima and two others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT), Ghaziabad, to decide a pending case (MACT No. 19 of 2025) concerning them and the respondents under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The petition alleged that …

HANSRAJ SINGHversusCHARUSHILA KUSHVAHA AND ANOTHER

Hansraj Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J D.) of Varanasi to decide Civil Suit No. 666 of 2025 (Hansraj Singh v. Charushila and another) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious disposal. …

RAMVEER AND 2 OTHERSversusYOGENDRA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) in Aligarh decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC in Misc. Case No. 236 of 2023, arising from an original suit, within a stipulated period to avoid irreparable loss. …

NARENDER PAL CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSMT. POOJA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Narender Pal Chauhan and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hapur, to decide an application (paper no. 6C) filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC in Suit No. 02 of 2026. The petition alleged that …

PAWAN KUMARversusASHOK AND 6 OTHERS

Pawan Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.18, Deoria, to decide an objection he raised on 06.03.2026 against an interim injunction granted under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC and an ex‑parte order dated 31.01.2026 in Civil Suit …

MOHAMMAD UMARversusMOHAMMAD JUVAIR AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Mohammad Umar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) at Pharenda, Maharajganj, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1/2 of the Code of Civil Procedure in original suit No. 554 of 2025. The petition sought an expeditious …

ARADHANAversusPRABHAKAR PATEL

The petitioner Aradhana filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.5, Allahabad, to decide her pending civil suit (Case No. 2292 of 2025) within the stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious disposal …

DINESH MISHRAversusSURESH MISHRA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the lower court to decide a 7C application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC, which arose from Original Suit No.87 of 2026. The High Court observed that the underlying suit was still pending and that …

MOHAMMAD ASIFversusTEHSEEM AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Mohammad Asif filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Meerut, to decide Motor Accident Claim No. 168 of 2024 (Asif v. Tehseem & others) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the claim was pending and required …

LALU SONKAR @ ANILversusSMT. MEENA SONKAR

The petitioner, Lalu Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Varanasi to decide a temporary injunction application filed by the respondent, Meena Sonkar, in suit O.S. 2880 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the injunction …

DEVKARAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Devkaran and four others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Presiding Officer of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Authority (LARRA), Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide Execution Case No. 31 of 2022 (Manoj Kumar & Others vs State of U.P.) …

SMT JAY DEVI SHUKLAversusBASANT KUMAR MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Jay Devi Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Jaunpur to decide the original suit No. 961/2013 against Basant Kumar Mishra and others within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the lower court had …

HARDEOversusKHALIL AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hardeo, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Kasya Kushinagar to decide the pending suit No. 69/2014 against Khalil and others within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s counsel, Omkar Nath Rai, argued that the suit …

NOORUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nooruddin, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide an interim injunction application (6-C) in Original Suit No. 1426 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the pending application …

PRADEEP KUMAR VISHWAKARMAversusMEENU VISHWAKARMA

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Vishwakarma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (Case No. 187 of 2023) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the suit …

DULIRAMversusDIRECTOR K.P. SINGH

The petitioner Duliram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District Rampur to decide Suit No. 281 of 2022 (Duliram vs Director K.P. Singh) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

SANTRAMversusANIL GAUTAM AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner Santram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Dumariyaganj, to decide the pending Original Suit No. 391 of 2024 against Anil Gautam and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was languishing …

SMT CHANDRAWATIversusGOPAL AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt Chandrawati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division Court No.2, Bareilly, to decide her original suit (No. 180 of 2014) against Gopal and five others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was …

DEENA NATHversusKRIPA SHANKAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deena Nath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the IInd Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) at Kashya, Kushi Nagar to decide Suit No. 1231 of 2009 (Jagannath et al. v. Kripa Shankar et al.) within a stipulated period. The petition solely asked for an expeditious …

RAJESH AND 3 OTHERSversusJANKU AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No. 14 Varanasi, to finally decide a pending civil revision (Civil Revision No. 29 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petition sought an expeditious disposal of that revision. …

SMT. SHARDA DEVIversusSMT. SUNITA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Sharda Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Ballia to decide an injunction application (6C2) in Original Suit No. 296/2025 against Smt. Sunita Devi and others. The petitioner requested that the lower court decide the matter …

SMT. REENA YADAVversusMUKESH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Reena Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (SD) Budaun to decide an interim injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 102/26 within a specified period and to maintain status quo over the disputed property until final …

IMRAN ALIversusGRAM PRADHAN GRAM PANCHAYAT CHANDPUR AUDHERA, AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Imran Ali filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Khaga, Fatehpur to decide his application for a temporary injunction in Original Suit No. 240 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the suit required expeditious disposal. The Court …

RAJENDRA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusMORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajendra Kumar and three others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Moradabad Development Authority and two other respondents. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, …

PURSOTTAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, whose son died after falling from a moving train, obtained a compensation award of Rs.8,00,000 from a railway tribunal, with only 20% released and the balance directed to a fixed deposit. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking release of the remaining 80% on grounds of …

SUMIT KUMARversusMANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Kanpur Nagar to decide the pending suit (Case No. 1226 of 2021) expeditiously. The High Court noted that the suit remains pending and that keeping the writ petition alive would serve …

SMT NIDHI CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Smt Nidhi Choudhary challenged an ex‑parte judgment of the Family Court that declared her second marriage void. The High Court examined two earlier appeals, one against the ex‑parte judgment and another against a subsequent judgment rejecting her condonation of delay. It found that the …

SMT. ISHU AND ANOTHERversusSHRI RAM KARAN AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Ishu and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Moradabad to decide a pending succession suit (Suit No. 158 of 2025) filed under section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petition sought an …

MAYA VERMAversusGYANENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

Maya Verma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide Original Suit No. 20 of 2016 and several pending applications, including a compromise application dated 24‑09‑2019. The High Court observed that the underlying suit …

RAGHUNATH AND ANOTHERversusDEEN DAYAL AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Raghunath and another filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Arun Kumar Singh, sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings later. The respondent's counsel, Bhawani …

ARVIND MOHAN GAURversusSANT LAL YADAV AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arvind Mohan Gaur, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court, Prayagraj, to decide the pending Original Suit No. 696 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The petition specifically invoked Order 39 Rule 1,2 read with Section …

RADHEY SHYAM PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A petition under Article 227 was filed by Radhey Shyam Pandey against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner was to be represented by counsel Rahul Sharma and Sikandar Gupta. On the date of hearing, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court held that a petition …

HARIRAMversusBANSHRAJI DEVI AND 9 OTHERS

Hariram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Azamgarh, to decide Application No.27 Ga 2 for recalling an ex‑parte order dated 04‑04‑2023 in case No. 246 of 2022 (Banshraji vs. Hariram). The Court noted that the underlying suit was still …

ASHA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusRAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Muhammadabad, Gohana, Mau, to decide Original Suit No. 50 of 2021 (Rajendra Prasad Singh v. Mevati & others) as expeditiously as possible. The petition sought only this supervisory direction and no …

RAJENDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusVIRENDRA SONTHALIA

Petitioner Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. The petitioner, through counsel Amit Pratap Singh, sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner also agreed to serve a copy of any fresh …

JAIRAM AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the arbitration case No. 228/2022 (Jairam and others v. NHAI) be expedited under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which was pending before the Additional District & Session Judge, Ghaziabad. The …

SMT. KAMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Kamla Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ghazipur to decide original suit No. 287/2024 within a stipulated period. The petition sought expeditious disposal of the pending suit. The High Court observed that …

HUKUM SINGHversusSMT. SHIMLA

Hukum Singh filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a compromise that he alleged to be fraudulent and fictitious, and sought appropriate legal proceedings against an order dated 13.07.2024. The petitioner contended that no genuine compromise had been entered into and that the …

SMT SURAJMUKHIversusSMT VIDYAWATI

The petitioner, Smt. Surajmukhi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C., Bareilly to execute a sale deed and to decide Execution Case No. 10 of 2022 pending before that judge. The petition raised the procedural question of whether the …