Created by Fuzzy Cloud

VIKAS BUDHWAR

583 judgments · newest first · showing 401–583

ASHISH GAUTAMversusVINITA GAUTAM

The petitioner, Ashish Gautam, married Vinita Gautam in 2011 and the couple have been living separately since January 2020. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act on 19 February 2026, seeking divorce, and also applied for a cooling period, which the Family Court …

NARENDRA SINGHversusMAHENDRA SING AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Narendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a revisional court order that set aside an interim injunction granted under Section 151 of the CPC. The original suit sought a permanent injunction, and an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for a temporary …

PUNWASIversusBECHAN SINCE DECEASED AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Punwasi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.19, Azamgarh, to decide a Restoration Application (Paper No. 4 Ga 2) that was filed as Misc. Case No. 01/2020 in Civil Suit No. 1330/2012 and has been …

MITHLESH KUMARversusSHATRUGHAN PRASAD AND 41 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Civil Judge Junior Division, District Chitrakoot, to decide Original Suit No. 233 of 2014 against Shatrughan Prasad and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel requested …

KULDEEP KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSATYAVEER SINGH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kuldeep Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Moradabad, to decide an ad interim injunction application (paper 6-C) in Original Suit No. 1047 of 2024. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required …

SANGAM SHAKAHARI BHOJNALAYAversusMOHAMMAD HASHRAT

The petitioner, Sangam Shakahari Bhojnalaya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (JD) of Kanpur Nagar to decide an application (paper no.141c2 dated 08.07.2019) filed in the original suit No. 890 of 2017 against Mohammad Hashrat. The petitioner …

RANJAN KUMARI BHARTIversusAKHILESH KUMAR SINGH

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumari Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a divorce order dated 01.01.2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, in Matrimonial Divorce Petition No. 766 of 2024, invoking Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The …

ABDUL RAHIMversusISLAM AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner Abdul Rahim filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ghazipur to decide paper No. 16Ga dated 05.02.2026, which is pending in original suit No. 243/2025. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious decision on the suit. The …

RENUversusMONTI SAINI

The petitioner, Renu, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide a pending matrimonial case (Case No. 1199 of 2025) filed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petition alleged that the Family Court had …

SMT. RAMSAKHI AND ANOTHERversusRAMNIVAS AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to set aside two lower court orders and to obtain a mandamus directing the respondents not to disturb their possession of disputed plots, along with costs. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh petition due to a technical defect. Counsel …

SMT. HOSHIYARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Hoshiyari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned District & Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr, to decide her application dated 16 September 2025 for a stay of execution proceedings arising from a judgment dated 20 August 2025 in Civil Case No. 862 …

SMT. GEETAversusSUNITA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Geeta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Basti to decide Original Suit No. 577 of 2017 (Bhanmati v. Sahbaraj Singh) and the accompanying Section 6C application for an interim injunction within a stipulated period. …

SRIRAM @ SANDEEP AND 4 OTHERSversusOM PRAKASH AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Sriram @ Sandeep and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Court No. 10, Deoria, to decide Suit No. 539 of 2022 (Om Prakash and another v. Sriram @ Sandeep and others) within a time‑bound period. The sole relief claimed was …

ROHIT KUMARversusSMT POOJA

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, to decide his pending divorce petition (No. 172 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious …

NIRAJAN CHOWDHRY AND ANOTHERversusCHURAN CHOWDHRY AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nirajan Chowdhry and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Saidpur, Ghazipur, to decide the pending Original Suit No. 69/2000 against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required …

CHITRA SHARMAversusPRAVEEN KUMAR PALIWAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Chitra Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Mathura to expedite Original Suit No. 791 of 2022 and to award costs. The petitioner later moved the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The learned Standing …

SHYAM SHARAN AND ANOTHERversusBARASATI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shyam Sharan and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 10, Deoria, to decide a pending Restoration Application (4‑G) filed in Misc. Case No. 187 of 2011, which arose out of an earlier suit (Original Suit …

ARUN KUMAR GAUTAMversusSMT. RUBI @ ARCHANA

Arun Kumar Gautam filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide his matrimonial suit (Case No. 261 of 2025) filed under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act and pending since 12‑Feb‑2025. The petitioner argued that the delay in the …

ADITYA KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSRI RAVENDRA PAL SINGH

The petitioners, Aditya Kumar and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Karunesh Narayan Tripathi, applied to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel …

MAYANK KUMAR FULWANIversusSMT KAJAL GEHANI @ YAKSHITA FULWANI

The petitioner, Mayank Kumar Fulwani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide his pending divorce suit (case no. 1077 of 2025) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, expeditiously. The petitioner …

SD JAIN HOSTELversusTAX SUPERINTENDENT NAGAR NIGAM AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, S.D. Jain Hostel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Small Cause Court, Allahabad, promptly decide a pending civil suit (Misc. Case No.62 of 2011) arising from an assessment appeal under Section 472 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. The …

SHIV JI YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusAFSAR AND 25 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Chandauli District to decide an application filed on 7 September 2024 in suit No. 381 of 2024 (Shiv Ji Yadav & others v. Afsar & others) within a fixed period. The petition claimed that the suit had been …

MEERA DEVIversusRAJDEV AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioner, Meera Devi, challenged an order that substituted the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff in Original Suit No. 579 of 2006. The plaintiff died on 15 January 2025, and under Order 22 Rule 3 of the CPC, proceedings were abated until the heirs were brought on record. The trial court …

RAJ KISHORversusRAM RAKSHA SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Raj Kishor, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Gorakhpur to decide Original Suit No.1166 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The petition solely requested an expeditious disposal of the pending suit. The Court observed that …

HAKIKULLAHversusMOHD ILIYAS AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Hakikullah, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Khalilabad, Basti, to expedite the hearing and disposal of O.S. No. 54 of 2011 (Hakikullah v. Mohd. Iliyas & another). The petition solely requested that the lower court hear the suit …

ANUJ GUPTAversusSMT. DIVI GUPTA

The petitioner, Anuj Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide the pending divorce suit (case no. 428 of 2023) under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the suit …

MAJADOON NISHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSHOBHNATH AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), Chandauli, to decide a pending application for interim injunction (Paper No 6C dated 23.11.2023) in Suit No. 556 of 2023 within a short period. The petitioners argued that the suit needed …

MUSKEENversusNOOR AHMAD AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Muskeen, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Rampur to decide the pending original suit No. 608 of 2025 against Noor Ahmad and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

RAMCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramchandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Budaun to decide Original Suit No. 184 of 2019, which has been pending since 2019. The petitioner argued that the suit needed to be decided expeditiously and that continued delay …

RAMESH CHANDRAversusSMT. SHIVKANTI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramesh Chandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Senior Division, District Kanpur Nagar, to decide Original Suit No. 2274/2013 (Shivkanti & others v. Rameshchandra & others) expeditiously. The petition claimed that the suit was pending …

RAM MANOHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Manohar, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the order dated 18-10-2025 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division/Fast Track Court-I, Kaushambi, which had quashed a previous decree. Counsel for the petitioner, Arvind Kumar, later sought to withdraw the petition on the ground …

SMT. SUGHARA DEVIversusSMT. LALDEI AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sughara Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Gorakhpur, to decide Miscellaneous Appeal No. 107 of 2021 arising from Original Suit No. 1201 of 2001. The appeal, titled "Smt. Laldei Versus Smt. Sughara Devi and others," remained …

RAMESH CHANDRA MAURYAversusRAJESH PANDEY AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. Ist, Sant Kabir Nagar to decide O.S. No.706 of 2021 (Rajesh Pandey v. Ramesh Chandra Maurya & others). The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

ABDUL RAZZAK AND ANOTHERversusRAM SHIROMANI AND 35 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to finally decide Suit No. 990 of 1996, which had been pending for over 30 years before the Upper Civil Judge, Junior Division, New Court Eleventh, District Jaunpur. The petitioners argued that the …

VANDANA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusRAMBHA YADAV

The petitioners sought a direction from the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 to compel the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Varanasi to decide a temporary injunction application (paper no. 6 C) filed in Original Suit No. 337 of 2025. The High Court noted that the original suit was still …

SAMSHADversusYASIN AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Samshad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Hawali, Saharanpur, to decide Misc. Case No. 62 of 2025 pending before that court. The petitioner argued that the lower court had unduly delayed the case and requested an expeditious …

ASHISH KUMAR SINGHversusLALIT KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS

Ashish Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Nagina, Bijnor, to decide a stay‑vacation application and an objection dated 14 November 2025 against an interim injunction in case No. 1155 of 2022 (Lalit Kumar & others v. Atul Kumar & …

SATYA DEVversusRAM DULAR AND 8 OTHERS

Satya Dev filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No.14, Allahabad, to decide Original Suit No. 3231 of 2022 against Ram Dular and others. The petitioner requested that the suit be decided expeditiously. The High Court observed that the …

UDAY NATH SINGHversusMOOL CHAND AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Uday Nath Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227. Counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition had become infructuous, and the respondents did not object. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the …

SMT SHAIL KUMARIversusSMT. SARASWATI DEVI (DECEASED) AND 5 OTHERS

Smt Shail Kumari filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of District Mirzapur to expedite the pending civil suit numbered 839/2014. The petition alleged that the suit was being unduly delayed and requested the High Court to intervene. The Court observed …

SHYAMBIHARIversusVIPIN KUMAR DUBEY AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyambihari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Etawah to decide a 6C application in original suit No. 108 of 2026 concerning disputed lands, to maintain status quo, and to restrain the respondents from …

RANDHEER SINGHversusTABREJ ALI

The petitioner, Randheer Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Muzaffarnagar, to decide Civil Suit No. 646 of 2017 (Randheer Singh v. Tabrej Ali) within a fixed period of three months and without unnecessary adjournments. The …

SAHABversusASHA DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Maharajganj, to decide Suit No. 362 of 2024 (Asha Devi & Another v. Sahab & Another) within the stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

RAMRATHI AND ANOTHERversusBRAJESH KUMAR

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (S.D) Jaunpur to expedite the pending suit (Case No. 316 of 2018) against them. The petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and that issuing further notices to the …

DWARIKA NATHversusRADHAMOHAN GOYAL AND 20 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dwarika Nath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge/F.T.C., Court No. 1, Azamgarh, to finally decide Civil Appeal No. 75 of 2013 (Radhamohan Goyal & others v. Muralidhar & others), which had been pending since 2013. The …

AYESHAversusSMT. KHAIRUNNISHA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ayesha, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Maharajganj, to decide an application filed by her in O.S. No. 21 of 2025. The petition sought an expeditious decision on that pending application. The Court observed that, as …

SEEMA DUBEYversusAMAN KUMAR DUBEY @ ANKIT

Seema Dubey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge Family Court, Bhadohi, to decide Marriage Petition No. 76 of 2024 filed under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act (Seema v. Sneha Singh). The petitioner argued that the marriage petition was pending and …

RAMA SHANKAR JAISWALversusSMT. UMRAWATI DEVI

The petitioner, Rama Shankar Jaiswal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Maharajganj, to decide Civil Suit No. 583 of 2019 (Umrawati Devi v. Rama Shankar Jaiswal). The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

MAHESH CHANDversusRISHIKANT AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahesh Chand, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Bishalpur Pilibhit to decide the pending Recall/Restoration Case No. 16 of 2016 (Mahesh Chandra v. Rishikant et al.) which is part of Original Suit No. 315 of 2001 (Mewaram v. …

MANOJ KUMARversusABHIMANYU

Manoj Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) in Jaunpur to decide suit No. 120 of 2023 (Manoj vs. Abhimanyu) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious disposal. The Court observed that …

MOHAMMAD FAIZANversusSHIBBU AHMAD AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Faizan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hawali, Azamgarh to decide a pending 6-C application in Original Suit No. 4139 of 2025 (Shibbu Ahmad & others v. Mohd Faizan) within a stipulated time. The …

MOHD. HASANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged a direction issued in an execution proceeding that required the court to seek clarification from the arbitrator on the interest component of an award under Section 3G(5) of the National Highway Act. The execution case had been withdrawn by the petitioner on 31‑03‑2026, and …

SMT REENA DEVIversusSMT ANJANI DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt Reena Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mathura, to decide Misc. Case No. 74 of 2015 (Reena Devi vs. Anjani Devi), which arose from Succession Case No. 122 of 2000. The petition alleged that the …

NITESH YADAVversusNAGINA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nitesh Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge Family Court, IIIrd Jaunpur, to decide Suit No. 795 of 2024 filed by him against Nagina under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the family court …

SUSHILAversusRAJESH AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sushila, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Awar Khand) in Haveli, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 910 of 2019 against Rajesh and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel urged expeditious disposal of the pending …

CHANDRA PRAKASH AND ANOTHERversusVINAY PRAKASH YADAV AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. Court No. 16, Allahabad to decide Original Suit No. 1925 of 2018 expeditiously. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without any progress and that a judicial direction …

NEELAM SINGHversusSHEBU AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neelam Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Garvi West Prayagraj, to expedite a permanent injunction application pending in suit No. 185 of 2024. The High Court noted that the suit itself was still pending and that issuing …

DEVKI NANDAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Devki Nandan and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sompal Kashyap, sought to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The standing counsel for the respondents raised no objection to this request. The Court, …

AMIT JAINversusCHOLA MANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANOTHER

Amit Jain filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Redressal Consumer Disputes Commission, Muzaffar Nagar, to decide the pending consumer case (Case No. 12 of 2022) against Chola Mandalam Investment & Finance Company Ltd. The petitioner argued that the consumer …

PURAN AND 2 OTHERSversusBHAUN AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kushi Nagar, Padrauna, to decide Original Suit No. 499 of 2023 (Banhu & others vs Puran & others) within the time stipulated by the High Court. The petition sought an expeditious …

ABDUL ALI AND ANOTHERversusMEHFUZUR RAHMAN AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Abdul Ali and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of District Mau to decide Original Suit No. 336 of 2021, which was pending between the same parties. The petition alleged that the lower court had unduly delayed …

VIVEK YADAVversusSMT. JULI YADAV@ SONAM

Vivek Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Agra, to decide a pending divorce petition (Vinod Yadav v. Smt. Juli Yadav @ Sonam) filed under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the divorce case, pending since …

SMT. SHIVANGI SONKARversusCHANDRASHEKHAR SONKAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Shivangi Sonlan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Upper Principal Judge of Family Court No.02, Kanpur Nagar, to expedite the pending civil suit No. 2734 of 2022 concerning divorce under sections 13, 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The …

HARIHARversusSAROJ AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of District Kushinagar to decide Original Suit No. 430 of 2012 (Saroj vs. Kamali and Others) within a fixed time. The petition sought expeditious disposal of the pending suit. The High Court observed …

RAJENDRA MISHRAversusRAJESH KUMAR BAJPAI AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajendra Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.4, Kanpur Nagar, to decide his original civil suit (Original Case No.1999 of 2021) against Rajesh Kumar Bajpai and others within a stipulated time. The …

DR. ARVIND KUMARversusSMT. AMITA SINGH AND 7 OTHERS

Dr. Arvind Kumar filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court against Smt. Amita Singh and others. The petition was being pursued by counsel Mr. Awadesh Tiwari and Ms. Gunjan Tiwari. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, requesting …

KAMLESH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSANJIV KUMAR SINGH AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a status‑quo order on three plots pending O.S. No. 752 of 2026, a civil suit before the Additional Civil Judge, Varanasi. The petition also mentioned a pending application under Section 6C for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule …

SHESHMANI DUBEYversusINDRAWATI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sheshmani Dubey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Haweli, Azamgarh, to expedite the pending Original Suit No. 1172 of 2020 (Indrawati & Others v. Chintamani Dubey & Others). The petition solely requested that the …

SUNILversusLALLAN AND 3 OTHERS

Sunil filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Maharajganj, to decide civil suit No. 64 of 2021 (Inrauti Devi & Others v. Lallan & others) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious …

SANJU DEVIversusPREM SHANKAR SHUKLA AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanju Devi filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (South), Prayagraj to decide her pending Claim Petition No. 683 of 2018 against Prem Shankar Shukla within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that the claim had been unduly delayed and …

MAYA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusGYANTI DEVI AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Maya Devi and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gorakhpur to decide temporary injunction Paper No. 7 in original suit No. 281/2025 (Gyanti Devi vs Maya Devi) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that …

CHANDRIKA YADAVversusSMT. SUSHILA YADAV AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Chandrika Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge of Avar Khnad Havali, Azamgarh, to decide her original suit (No.1272 of 2020) against Sushila Yadav within a fixed time. The petition sought an expeditious disposal of the pending suit. …

SRI PANKAJ SARSWAT AND 10 OTHERSversusSRI SUBHASH SARSWAT AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Koil, Aligarh to decide an application filed under Order XXXIX Rule‑1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Original Suit No. 456 of 2024. The High Court noted that the underlying suit was still pending and that keeping the …

SATENDRA KUMARversusRAVINDRA SINGH

Satendra Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide the pending Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.28 of 2025 (Satendra Kumar v. Ravindra Singh) filed under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, …

PURNIMA @ GUDIYAversusKUSUM AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge‑13, Allahabad, to decide the pending Miscellaneous Civil Case No.190/2024 (Purnima @ Gudiya v. Kusum) within a stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel urged that the suit be decided …

DEEP CHANDRAversusJAGANNATH

The petitioner, Deep Chandra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Jaunpur to decide a pending suit (Case No. 283 of 2017, Deepchand Vs. Jagannath) and a related 7C2 application within a stipulated time. The petitioner’s counsel …

UDAY SINGHversusKRISHAN KUMAR SINGH

The petitioner, Uday Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (C.D.) Mirzapur to decide Original Suit No. 166 of 2015 expeditiously, alleging that delay would cause irreparable loss. The petition sought a mandatory time‑frame for the lower court's …

CHHOTE LALversusHEERA LAL AND 11 OTHERS

Petitioner Chhote Lal filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), New Court‑II, Jaunpur to expedite the pending civil suit (Case No. 437 of 2007, Brij Bihari & Others v. Heera Lal & Others). The petitioner argued that the suit was unduly delayed …

SANJAY SINGH PARIHARversusMRS. URMILA VYAS AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh Parihar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, to decide Original Suit No. 556 of 2019 pending before it. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required expeditious disposal. The …

GIRISH DUBEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSANDHYA PATHAK

Petitioners Girish Dubey and two others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gorakhpur to consider and decide Suit No. 910 of 2014 (Sandhya Pathak vs. Girish Dubey) within a stipulated time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and …

SUJAT ALIversusKANIJ FATIMA AND ANOTHER

Sujat Ali filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Haweli, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 2370 of 2024 (Kanij Fatima v. Abdul Ahad and others) within the stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required …

SURESH KUMARversusPHOOL SINGH

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Dehat, to decide the pending Original Suit No.383 of 2016 against Phool Singh without any adjournments and within a specified period. The petitioner’s counsel, Uttam …

KAILASH AND ANOTHERversusSMT. SUSHAMA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kailash and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide their Original Suit No. 444 of 2025 and the accompanying temporary injunction application within a stipulated period. The petition alleged that …

PUSHPA RAIversusGIRISH CHANDRA RAI AND 4 OTHERS

Pushpa Rai filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 1031 of 2016 (Girish Chandra Rai v. Laxmi Kant Rai & others) within a specified period. The petitioner argued that the suit had been pending for a long …

CHHATRAPAL SINGHversusRANJEET SINGH

The petitioner, Chhatrapal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) II, Bareilly, to decide a 6‑C application filed under Order 39 Rule‑1 & 2 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 392 of 2023, and to restrain the respondent from …

ANURADHA CHAUHANversusSHAKUN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of District Mirzapur to decide Original Suit No. 235 of 2021 (Balmukund vs Shakun and others) expeditiously. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and that keeping the …

MOTI LAL SAROJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioner, Moti Lal Saroj, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Varanasi, to decide the Interim Injunction Application 6‑C in Civil Suit No. 740 of 2025 within a reasonable time. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and …

ABHAY SONKARversusSMT SHWETA

Petitioner Abhay Sonkar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (Case No.1361 of 2022) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the suit should be …

SEEMENDRA BHATNAGARversusSHYAM SRIVASTAVA

The petitioner, Seemendra Bhatnagar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Kanpur Nagar to decide Original Suit No. 920/2024 (Shyam Srivastava v. Seemendra Bhatnagar and others) within a specific period. The petition solely requested expeditious …

SMT JAGANI DEVI AND 6 OTHERSversusHARI SINGH YADAV AND 17 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court‑4, Ghazipur, to decide Original Suit No.335 of 2002 (Smt. Jagani Devi and others v. Hari Singh Yadav and others) within a reasonable time. The High Court noted that the …

ROHITAS KUMAR SINGHversusMANJU SINGH AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rohitas Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Eastern, Ballia, to decide Application No.6C2 (6Ga2) in Original Suit No.510/2024 against Manju Singh and others within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the pending …

SMT. SUDHA VASHISHTHversusSMT. SARITA JHA

The petitioner, Smt. Sudha Vashishth, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Etah to decide Civil Suit No. 296 of 2021 against Smt. Sarita Jha within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and required …

SMT. RAJRANI DEVIversusMOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (NORTH) AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Smt. Rajrani Devi filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (North), Prayagraj to decide her pending application dated 13 September 2025 (Misc. Case No. 164 of 2025) within a fixed time and to release the remaining 40% amount of Rs.5,94,000. …

RAM SAKHIversusARVIND AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Sakhi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Paschimi, Ballia to decide the pending suit (Case No.1022/2021) against the respondents expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …

SUBHASH PATELversusSHAMBHU NATH & 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhash Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Sharki), Allahabad, to decide Suit No. 1435 of 2005 (Ram Lakhan vs. Shambhu Nath and Others) within a fixed time. The petition solely requested an expeditious disposal of the pending suit. …

MAJAHARversusTAUBAB ALI

Majahar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate of Dumariyaganj to decide a pending application (Misc. Case No. 18/2025) arising out of Original Case No. 299 of 2020 between the parties. The petitioner argued that the lower court should …

VINDHYAWASINversusSMT. PRATIMA PANDEY

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2, Allahabad, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (No.1143 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on an expedited basis. The petition specifically …

SANJEEV KUMARversusSHRI SATPAL

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar to decide Original Suit No. 380/2024 (Km. Chairis & others vs Satpal) expeditiously. The sole relief claimed was for the High Court to order the lower court …

PALARAMversusDINESH

The petitioner, Palaram, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Civil Suit No. OS/455 of 2015 (Palaram vs. Dinesh) within a fixed time. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious disposal of the suit. The High Court observed that the civil …

GITA DEVIversusSMT. KESH KUNWAR

The petitioner, Gita Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jalaun at Orai to decide Original Suit No. 425 of 2022 (Mahendra Pratap Singh v. Smt. Kesh Kunwar) within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the civil suit …

MOHD. CHAMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive merits were considered.

ABDUL HAMEED AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT. NAFEESA FATIMA AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Abdul Hameed and others filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No. 6, Bareilly, to decide a stay application dated 05.07.2025 that was pending in Civil Appeal No. 33 of 2024. The sole relief sought was for the High Court to expedite …

CHHEDI LALversusASHA DEVI

The petitioner, Chhedi Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 in Original Suit No. 1700 of 2024 (Chhedi Lal v. Asha Devi) within a specified time. The petitioner argued …

SHIVANAND AND ANOTHERversusCHANDRIKA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Rasra, District Ballia, to decide Execution Case No. 7 of 2025 (Shivanand et al. v. Chandriaka et al.) in accordance with a judgment dated 4‑12‑2008 and a decree order dated O.S. No. 1163 of 2002. …

BAIJNATHversusSMT. UMA DEVI AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Baijnath filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide a pending suit (Case No. 128 of 2024) for permanent and declaratory injunction filed by Smt. Uma Devi. The petitioner argued that the suit needed to be …

SMT NAYAN YADAV @ NAYANTARAversusJAI NARAYAN YADAV AND 4 OTHERS

Smt Nayan Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, West Ballia, to decide Original Suit No. 423 of 2024 and an accompanying application for a temporary injunction, both pending since 29 March 2024. The petitioner contended that the delay …

PRITIversusRAHUL

The petitioner Priti filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to decide her pending matrimonial case (Case No. 362 of 2025) under sections 13, 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petition argued that the suit needed to be …

LALCHAND AND 3 OTHERSversusSUSHIL SRIVASTAVA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Jaunpur, to decide the pending suit (Case No. 1195 of 2020) against the respondents. The petition alleged that the suit was pending without any progress and requested the High Court to …

MOHAMMAD IRFANversusMOHAMMAD ARSHAD ALAM AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Irfan filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. (C.A.W.) in Kanpur decide the 6C application in Original Suit No. 246 of 2026 against respondent Mohammad Arshad Alam and others expeditiously, preferably within a stipulated …

BHAGWAN SINGHversusVIJENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Bhagwan Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Mathura to decide Original Suit No. 856 of 2023 against Vijendra Singh and others within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s counsel, Mahabir Yadav, requested an expeditious disposal of …

SMT. RINKUversusSMT. KRISHNA

The petitioner, Smt. Rinku, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite Civil Suit No.432 of 2014 pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Gautam Budh Nagar. The sole relief claimed was for the trial court to decide the suit within a …

PRADEEP KUMAR PANDEYversusSMT. SANDHYA DEVI

Petitioner Pradep Kumar Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court to set aside an order dated 8 October 2025 of the Upper Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoria, which had dismissed his application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in a divorce suit. The …

DHANARA @ DHANARI DEVIversusSAMARNATH

The petitioner, Dhanara @ Dhanari Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Jaunpur to decide the pending Original Suit No. 104 of 2021 against Samarnath expeditiously. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the suit be decided …

ABHINAV ANANT AND ANOTHERversusTATA CAPITAL LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhinav Anant and another filed a writ petition seeking to withdraw the proceedings under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Their counsel, Girish Pandey, requested the court to allow the withdrawal and to grant liberty to pursue appropriate legal steps thereafter. …

BRAHAM PRAKASHversusSEEMA RANI SAXENA

Petitioner Braham Prakash filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Auraiya, to decide the pending Hindu Marriage Act case (HMA No. 570 of 2024) against respondent Seema Rani Saxena. The petitioner argued that the family court had unduly …

ATA HUSAIN AND 7 OTHERSversusGULAM NAKI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a suit seeking a declaration of ownership and a permanent injunction over certain plots, also moving for a temporary injunction. The trial court granted a status‑quo order without examining the counter‑claim filed by the respondents or making a finding on possession. The …

DHARMENDRAversusRAMOTAR AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Dharmendra filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel Jata Shankar Pandey, later requested to withdraw the petition on the ground of an inherent defect, asking for liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel …

RAM CHANDRA AND 16 OTHERSversusARBITRATOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Chandra and 16 others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Magistrate/Arbitrator in Ghazipur to decide the pending case No. 3365 of 2025 (National Highway Authority of India vs Competent Authority/Additional District Magistrate) under Section 3G(5) of the …

HEERA LAL AND 4 OTHERSversusCHANDRA SHEKHAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed O.S. No.328 of 2022 seeking prohibitory and mandatory injunctions, which was decreed on 08.03.2021. The respondents appealed the decree (Civil Appeal No.7 of 2021) and a stay application was decided on 30.04.2025, where no stay was granted but a date was fixed for hearing. …

MADAN GOPAL (SINCE DECEASED) AND ANOTHERversusNARAD AND 13 OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Madan Gopal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Bansi Siddharth Nagar to decide the pending Original Suit No. 96 of 1990 against the respondents expeditiously. The sole relief claimed was for the High Court …

KIRAN PANDEYversusBHAGGU (SINCE DECEASED) AND 7 OTHERS

In this writ petition under Article 227, Kiran Pandey challenged the rejection of an amendment application filed in a related appeal. The petitioner’s counsel, Arvind Kumar Shukla, argued that despite the rejection, the present petition was filed and that the petitioner should be allowed to raise …

KRISHNA PRATAPversusSMT. PRATIMA ALIAS PINKI

The petitioner, Krishna Pratap, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide the pending divorce suit (case no. 576 of 2021) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the suit was pending and …

SMT. SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the trial court decide an impleadment application filed on 1 May 2025 in Succession Case No.33 of 2025 (Rajendra Babbar @Rajendar Babbar v. Awaam Janta). The petition argued that the pending suit …

BIRENDRA BANSALversusANIL MITTAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Birendra Bansal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (SD) Gautam, Buddh Nagar, to expedite the pending Original Suit No.1189 of 2009 (Anil Mittal vs. Birendra Bansal) for a mandatory and permanent injunction. The petition alleged …

RAJESHversusRAJENDRA AND 23 OTHERS

The petitioner Rajesh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)‑5th, Mathura, to decide a pending application for a temporary injunction (6‑C application) filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC in Original Suit No. 1455/2024. The …

BAHADUR @ LAL BAHADURversusMUNNU AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bahadur (Lal Bahadur), filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Mirzapur to decide execution case No. 2/2007, which arose from original suit No. 354 of 1978 (Badari Prasad v. Munnu). The petition argued that the execution …

SMT. SHARAD KUMARI AND 5 OTHERSversusSURENDRA VERMA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Sharad Kumari and five others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (SD) at Padrauna, District Kushinagar, to consider and decide an execution application dated 2 April 2026 filed under Order 39 Rule 2A and Section 151 of the Code of …

BHAVESH NARAIN MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusCHAKRESH NARAYAN MISHRA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bansgaon, Gorakhpur to decide an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 (16C) of the Civil Procedure Code, which had been pending since 13 October 2025 in Civil Suit No. 457 of 2025. The High Court observed that keeping the …

RAJ KUMARversusMAHENDRA YADAV AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the lower court to decide a pending temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 228 of 2025. The High Court had earlier disposed of a similar petition (Bare Lal & Ors. v. Mahendra Yadav) by directing …

SRIRAM YADAVversusMISHRI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sriram Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Haveli, Azamgarh, to expedite the disposal of his suit (Case No. 1219 of 2013) against Mishri and to decide a pending 6C application during the suit's final disposal. The …

MOLAHE @ MOLHUversusSMT. ASHMA KHATOON

The petitioner, Molahe @ Molhu, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Dumariyaganj, Siddharth Nagar, to decide a pending suit (Case No. 348 of 2025) concerning the cancellation of an unregistered will deed dated 25 September 1997 relating to three …

MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH AND 3 OTHERSversusMOHAMMAD UMAR AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ under Article 227 directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Shahganj, Jaunpur to finally decide an application filed on 23 July 2024 under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC in Suit No. 771 of 2024. The High Court noted that the suit was still pending and …

KARMVEER SINGHversusPRITI CHAUHAN

The petitioner, Karmveer Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court to direct the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Gautambudhanagar to (i) allow his application under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 277 of 2021, restraining the respondent from …

DHEERAJ KUMAR PATELversusSANJAY SONI

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Hawali, Varanasi to decide his original suit (No.2660 of 2025) for dispossession of the defendant expeditiously. The petition sought an order for the civil court to hear and …

RADHE SHYAM SONKAR ALIAS MATTARversusPANGU ALIAS PAMMU AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioner, Radhe Shyam Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mirzapur to decide a 6-C application filed on 15 March 2024 in Original Suit No. 147 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the pending application required expeditious …

KANIKA JALAN @ KANIKA KversusABHISHEK JALAN

The petitioner, Kanika Jalan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. The petitioner’s counsel, Jagdamba Raj Jaiswal, sought to withdraw the petition on the ground of an inherent defect, requesting liberty to re‑file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel for …

MANOJ KUMARversusMAHKAR AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Gautam Budh Nagar, to hear and decide Civil Appeal No.161/2024 (Manoj Kumar vs Mahkar and others) as early as possible. The petitioner argued that the appeal needed expeditious …

SHARAD JI SHUKLAversusVIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sharad Ji Shukla and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)‑II, Basti, to decide an interim injunction application filed in Original Suit No. 47 of 2020. The petition alleged that the lower court was …

RAJRANI AND ANOTHERversusSMT. SHANTI AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners sought relief under Article 227 to stay a pending recall application concerning an ex parte decree dated 28‑04‑2011 in Original Suit No. 313 of 1984 (Jagdish Bharti v. Chandan Lal). The decree was challenged by a recall application filed in Misc. Case No. 1174 of 2012, which remains …

RAVINDRA SINGHversusVISHWA DEV PRASAD AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravindra Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Mau to decide the pending suit O.S. No.128 of 1996 (Vishwa Dev vs. Shamsher and others). The petitioner argued that the suit should be decided expeditiously. The High Court noted that the …

ZAHIRA KHATOONversusJAMEEL AHAMAD AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Zahira Khatoon, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Sant Kabir Nagar to decide her suit (No. 324 of 2013) against Jameel Ahamad and others. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the suit be decided expeditiously. The …

SADABRIJversusDAYARAM AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sadabrij, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahganj, Jaunpur, to decide Miscellaneous Suit No. 04 of 2024 against the respondents expeditiously under Section 39 Rule (2A) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil …

SHAUKAT AND 4 OTHERSversusACHCHHELAL

The petitioners Shaukat and four others filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahganj, Jaunpur to decide a 6C application dated 10 May 2023 in suit No. 673 of 2023. The petition argued that the pending suit required an expeditious decision …

SHYAM KUMARIversusVINOD AND 25 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Kumari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide Suit No. 1239 of 2021 (Shyam Kumari v. Vinod & others) within a time frame fixed by the High Court. The petition alleged that the suit was pending and …

KULDEEP SINGH SALUJA AND 3 OTHERSversusJASVIR SINGH SALUJA

The petitioners, Kuldeep Singh Saluja and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Muhammadabad, Ghazipur to promptly decide original suit No. 495 of 2021 (Ajeet Singh & others v. Jasvir Singh Saluja). The petition alleged that …

PRAMOD KUMARversusANANT PRASAD

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Hamipur to decide the pending original suit No.07 of 2010 against Anant Prasad. The petitioner argued that the suit should be decided expeditiously. The Court noted that the suit was …

SEEMA DEVIversusMAMTA DEVI

The petitioner, Seema Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Hawali, Bareilly to decide Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2025 involving the respondent, Mamta Devi. The petitioner’s counsel requested an expeditious decision of the pending …

VINOD KUMARversusPREMDEI AND 3 OTHERS

Vinod Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the pending Suit No. 52 of 2010 (Premdei v. Rajdei), which concerns the cancellation of a gift deed, be decided expeditiously by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mohammadabad Gohna, District Mau. The petitioner argued …

SMT. VANDANA SINGHversusJATA SHANKAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Vandana Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition. The standing counsel for the respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the …

PRADEEP SHARMAversusSMT. NEHA

Petitioner Pradeep Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide his pending divorce petition (No. 825 of 2024) under section 13(1)(i‑a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued for an …

DIVAKAR YADAVversusGEETA DEVI

Divakar Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to expedite the hearing of Misc. Case No. 213 of 2024 (Divakar v. Geeta) and to recall an order dated 25‑09‑2024 in Case No. 854 of 2022. The petition claimed …

SUNAINAversusMAYA DEVI

Sunaina filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghazipur, to decide her pending suit No. 234 of 2023 for recovery of money. The High Court noted that the suit was already pending and that issuing further notices in the writ petition would be …

VIRENDRA KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSUGGA LAL AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Kaushambi, to decide Civil Appeal No. 45 of 2025 (Sugga Lal & others v. Badri Prasad & others) expeditiously. The High Court noted that the civil appeal was pending and that keeping the writ petition …

VIJENDRA SINGHversusTIKAM SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vijendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the pending Civil Suit No.433 of 2014 against Tikam Singh. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the suit be decided expeditiously, arguing that the writ petition had no …

COLONEL ADITYA DEOversusLT COL PRIYAMVADA CHAUBEY

Petitioner Colonel Aditya Deo filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide the pending matrimonial suit (Case No. 1629 of 2023) under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the suit was …

SMT ANITA DEVI WIDOWversusSRI SHANKAR DAYAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Anita Devi Widow, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hamirpur to dispose of Original Suit No. 60 of 2010 (Shankar Dayal & Others v. Anita) which had been pending since February 2010. The sole relief claimed was an …

SUMITRAversusGIRIJESH SINGH

The petitioner, Sumitra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kushinagar to decide a pending suit for cancellation of a sale deed (case no. 19 of 2023). The petition sought an expeditious decision on the suit and the accompanying 6C …

SACHIN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusHARENDRA AND 2 OTHER

The petitioners, Sachin Kumar Sharma and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Civil Suit No. 2112 of 2024 (Harendra and others v. Sharma) expeditiously, alleging that delay would cause irreparable loss. The petition alleged that the …

ISRAR AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY EDUCATION AND 2 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Israr Ahmad filed Writ A No. 3937 of 2003 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter and that the petition had …

AWDHESH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Awdhesh Kumar Pandey filed Writ Petition No. 1936 of 2002 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that the petition was not prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The …

AKABAR NAEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. MINORITY WELFARE DEPTT. and ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Petitioner Akabar Naeem filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 2773 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed under a non‑adjournable list, but the petitioner failed to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any …

AKBAR NAEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.MINORITY WELFARE DEPTT.LKO.andORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner, Akbar Naeem, filed Writ A No. 2420 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare Department. The petition was listed under a special roster stating that such cases shall not be …

AKBAR NAIMversusTHE RIGISTRAR INSPECTOR ARBI PERSIN MADARSA U.P.ALLAHABAD

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Petitioner Akbar Naim filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 3331 of 2002) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed under a non‑adjournable list, but no further prosecution was undertaken by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated …

DINESH PRATAP CHANDversusSURESH PRATAP CHAND AND 5 OTHERS

Dinesh Pratap Chand filed a civil revision petition (No. 80 of 2021) against Suresh Pratap Chand and five others in the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press the matter. Consequently, the court noted the lack of …

GOPAL YADAVversusState of UP AND 3 Others

The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to (i) decide on payment of his monthly salary with arrears and interest, and (ii) restore his employment as a Ward Boy. He also sought any other appropriate relief and costs. The petitioner’s counsel …

SANDEEP KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Mishra, a Chakbandi Karta appointed in 2024, sought transfer from Jaunpur to Hathras, Kannauj or Auraiyya citing his wife's illness and his elderly mother's health. He argued that the Transfer Policy permits a transfer on his own request given such intervening …

SARLA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, four Anganwadi Sahaikas, applied in 2021 for promotion to Anganwadi Karyakarti based on a government order dated 29.01.2021 that required only a high school qualification. The selection process was not completed, and a later government order dated 21.03.2023 raised the qualification …

KRISHNA KUMAR TIWARIversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission advertised 39 cartographer posts and conducted a two‑stage selection comprising a screening test followed by an interview. The petitioner cleared the screening with a high quality‑point score of 83.97 but scored only 8 marks in the …

JANMEJAY SINGHversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Janmejay Singh, claimed to be engaged as a PRD Jawan under the U.P. Provisional Guard/Development Cops Rules and sought a court order directing the State to deploy him despite two pending criminal cases—one under the Prevention of Corruption Act and another under the NDPS Act. He …

BACHCHA LALversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Bachcha Lal, employed as a daily‑wage gardener at the Rajkiya Paudhshala in Kaushambi from 1 January 2008 to 30 November 2011, was terminated on 1 December 2011 without notice. The Labour Court declared the termination illegal, reinstated him and awarded back wages on 26 March 2021. The State …

RAN BAHADUR SINGHversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Sub‑Registrar who superannuated on 31‑07‑2022, claimed that despite being senior (Sl. No.145) he was denied promotion to Assistant Inspector General (Registration)/Assistant Stamp Commissioner, while juniors were promoted. He alleged violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the …

DINESH KUMAR DWIVEDIversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, an Honorary Platoon Commander of the Uttar Pradesh Home Guard, challenged the cancellation of his appointment after a charge‑sheet was filed against him under IPC sections 342, 294, 323 and 34. The cancellation was based on a Government Order dated 18 August 2023 that classified …

AMRENDRA KANT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an Executive Engineer in the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department, was suspended under the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 for allegedly bifurcating repair work tenders to keep each below the Rs 10 lakh threshold and thereby avoid mandatory e‑tendering. …

MANISH TIWARI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Manish Tiwari and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was listed as Writ‑A No.2169 of 2026 and was heard by Justice Vikas Budhwar. After consideration, the court …

ASHWANI TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission advertisement for recruitment of Assistant Prosecution Officers, alleging that the reservation of SC, ST and OBC posts was applied post‑wise rather than vacancy‑wise, contrary to the principle laid down in Indira Sawhney. The State …

BALIRAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Block Education Officer, was transferred multiple times and later suspended following show‑cause notices alleging illegal gratification and improper deductions from a composite grant. The petitioner challenged the suspension, claiming no misconduct and that the allegations were …

SHAKEEL HASAN KHAN AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, appointed as Urdu Translators‑cum‑Junior Clerks, were granted a third financial upgradation on 16‑02‑2024, which was later cancelled by an order dated 04‑12‑2025 issued by the District Development Officer, Bareilly, without any show‑cause notice. The petitioners challenged the …