Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
237 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicant, Shahbaz (represented by Ms. Maya Devi), filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought to have the application dismissed as withdrawn. The State, represented by its learned …
The applicant, Shuyab @ Shoaib Ahmad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a criminal case (Crime No. 94 of 2026). He later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant, who had already been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC/84 of the …
Anand Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 417, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged after a four‑year delay and was a retaliatory measure against a prior case in Tripura. …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. filed by Vishnu Kumar and two others, who were accused in a suicide‑abetment case (Crime No. 592 of 2026). The applicants claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged after an unreasonable …
The applicant, a 17‑year‑old minor, was charged under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 16‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage. The FIR was lodged on 28‑06‑2026, two weeks after the alleged …
The applicant, Furkan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 258 of 2026). He later sought to withdraw this application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court. The State had no objection to the withdrawal. The High …
Pavan Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he is charged under IPC sections 376, 342, 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He had previously been granted regular bail, appeared regularly in court, and the trial court had ordered his surrender after a revision application. The applicant …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jitendra Sharma under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 111(3), 318(4), 61(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(3) of the IPC. Sharma claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and pledged …
The applicant, Lalit, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. in Crime No. 201 of 2026, alleging false implication in a road‑side accident that resulted in death on 26 July 2026. He argued that the FIR was lodged after an unexplained delay, that there is no evidence …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Singh in a rape case (CrPC 482) where the FIR alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and frivolous, and there was no medical …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Munni Devi @ Meera and Chandrashekhar Vishwakarma in a case under Section 108 BNS alleging abetment of suicide. The applicants contended they were falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged after a 20‑day delay, and there was …
The applicant, Vipin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 603 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS Act. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shyamveer in a case where a charge‑sheet under IPC sections 281, 191(2), 191(3), 352, 115(2) and 109 had been submitted. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was never arrested during investigation, and offered to …
The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 131, 333, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed the FIR was filed under pressure and that affidavits from the injured parties indicated …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. filed by Narayan Hari in a case where a charge‑sheet had already been submitted. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that he was not named in the FIR and that the only link to him was a co‑accused's …
The applicants Chand Mohammad and two others filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where they were charged under several provisions of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the FIR …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pankak Kumar under CrPC Section 482 in a rape‑related case (IPC Sections 64(2), 333, 351(3)). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and inconsistencies in the victim's statements, and offered to cooperate with …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Imteyaj under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the definition of a "gang" under …
The applicant, Akshat Kushwaha, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 761 of 2025) under Sections 8, 20, 22 and 60 of the NDPS Act. He initially filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Subsequently, he sought to withdraw that application and instead file a …
Virendra was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 149 IPC but the investigating officer did not file a charge‑sheet against him, exonerating him after investigation. After the trial of co‑accused concluded, the trial court, on an application under Section 319 CrPC/358 BNSS, …
The applicant, Mobin, was named as an accused in a murder case arising from the death of his sister‑in‑law, based primarily on a second dying declaration that alleged his presence at the scene, although the first declaration omitted his name and call records placed him at his shop. He contended that …
The applicant, Alatmash Malik, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 250 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 353(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) and Section 66 of the Information …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 323 of 2026) involving sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and 105(1) of the BNS. The applicant later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …
Constable Mohar Singh and another applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S.S. in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The State opposed, noting that proceedings under Section 82 CrPC/84 B.N.S.S. had already declared the applicants proclaimed offenders. The Court …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 filed by Vikash Kumar Singh, who was implicated in a rape case (IPC ss.69, 352, 351(3), 316(2)). The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a long‑term consensual relationship that soured, and asserted innocence. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramkumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case of alleged poisoning (Crime No.17 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim's viscera report showed no poisonous substance and …
The applicant, Rasheed Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 28 of 2025) seeking relief under Section 482 and several provisions of the B.N.S. Act. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a final report had already been filed …
The applicant, Ausan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC section 482. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application contained glaring mistakes that could not be corrected by amendment or a supplementary affidavit. The court held that such defects rendered the application …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Govind under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a rape case (Crime No.295 of 2026). Govind claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting a consensual relationship with the victim and no injury to her, while …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Dinesh under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging his involvement in the suicide of a deceased person, charged under Sections 191(2), 333, 127(2) of the CrPC and Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The applicant claimed …
The applicants, Satyam Tiwari and Arun Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 479 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 504, 506, 307, 34 and 148 of the IPC. They contended that they were …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S. after being added as an accused based on a dying declaration of the deceased, which named him. The State opposed, producing a video of the declaration that implicated the applicant. The Court examined the nature of the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ikbal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was a retaliatory …
The applicant, Sahbaz @ Mohd Shahbaj, was implicated in a 2018 case under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 308 and 504 IPC and sought anticipatory bail after a non‑bailable warrant was issued without service of summons. He argued that the injuries alleged were not grievous, that the chargesheet had …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Murad Ali under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 409 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a two‑year delay in filing the FIR, and asserted that the money …
The applicant, Suldeep @ Sandip, was implicated in Crime No. 416 of 2026 under Sections 309(4), 238(A), 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482. The State argued that a final report had already been filed on 10‑09‑2026 and the applicant had no …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devi Dayan Gupta under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic and Dangerous Substances Act in a case of alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a 72‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of direct evidence, …
The applicant, Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Crime No.604 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. He claimed innocence and argued that the police were attempting an unwarranted arrest, citing a prior interim bail order and the Supreme …
The applicant, Tauseef Raza @ Adil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 10158 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application contained glaring procedural defects that could not be cured by …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Chauhan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 225 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the alleged victim was a consenting party, while the State opposed the bail but …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was implicated under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged 24 days after the incident, that there was no direct or indirect evidence linking him to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Rohit Ram, who was named in an FIR for alleged offences under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (section 11). The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Rajkumar Dubey, who feared arrest in a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 147, 406, 420 and 120‑B IPC. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences did not attract a …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Monu @ Rohit, who was implicated in a suicide case under Sections 108, 115(2), 333 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delayed FIR, lack of evidence of abetment, and asserted that the arrest would …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Fatichand Yadav, who was implicated as the owner of a vehicle alleged to have been used for transporting cow progeny in violation of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Cow Protection Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to …
The applicant, Manoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S. in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), 105 and 106(1) B.N.S., where he was seated on a tractor driven by co‑accused Virendra Kumar who lacked a driving licence and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ompal Singh, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 409, 406, 120-B, 467 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that he had cooperated with the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kuldeep in a rape case (Crime No. 323 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, the relationship was consensual for 3-4 years, and …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. After hearing, the applicants sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhudev under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aniket in a case under Sections 191(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) and 342(4) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and pledged cooperation with the investigation, while the State opposed the bail but did …
The applicant, Aajeet, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 408 of 2026) alleging Sections 76 and 351(2) of the BNSS, claiming apprehension of arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.46/2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 276, 277, 278 and 318(4) of the BNSS Act. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjit Singh Baghel under Section 482 CrPC in a case registered under Section 409 IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a three‑year delay in filing the FIR and his absence from work on …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ajay Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the vehicle alleged to be involved had been sold, and that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kamendra Yadav, who was implicated in an Arms Act case (Sections 3, 5, 25, 7) based solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused. The applicant asserted his innocence, argued that …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamendra Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3, 5, 25 and 7 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the sole basis of the accusation was the confessional statement of a …
The applicant, Jakir, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 400 of 2007) under Section 137 of the Electricity Act and Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC but later sought to withdraw it and instead file a regular bail …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Gauri Shankar, who was alleged to have induced investors to deposit money with VEALL Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited under a scheme promising to double the amount in six years. The applicant contended that he was merely an agent of the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamlesh Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the only basis for his implication …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil in Crime No.311 of 2026, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Sahil had enticed a minor girl, but the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated she was older, had left …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 140(1) and 3/5 of the B.N.S. for alleged abduction of a husband. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim was a relative and that the abduction was a money dispute, and …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33448 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed. Neither the informant's counsel nor the Additional Government Advocate …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Goriyank Tomar, who alleged false implication in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 109, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Bhartiya, who was arrested in Crime No. 412 of 2026 under Sections 109(1) and 115(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that a similarly situated co‑accused, Neeraj Bhartiya, had already been granted …
Ravi Shakya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 of the B.N.S. after being accused of firing at the son of an informant, causing a fracture to the left ulna as evidenced by an X‑ray report. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging a delayed FIR and false allegations, and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Irfan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 226 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault after a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and …
Arun Kumar Gupta and Anil Kumar Gupta were charged under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 IPC in Crime No. 181 of 2019. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and lack of credible evidence. The High Court initially granted them interim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Golu Patel, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 300 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged four …
The applicant, Priyanshu Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under sections 111(2)(B), 318(2), 319(2) of the B.N.S. and section 66D of the IT Act in a criminal case. He later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepa and Preeti in Crime No. 477 of 2026, which involved alleged offences under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 127(2), 109(1) and 351(3) B.N.S. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated in a matrimonial dispute, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shubham, accused in a rape case arising from a long‑term consensual relationship allegedly based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, the victim’s statements were inconsistent, there was no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ishan Upadhaya, accused in Crime No. 265 of 2026 under sections 89, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in a case involving the death of a newborn at his hospital, noting that the victim’s …
Vimal, the applicant, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 189 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The State argued that the investigation had been converted under Section 70(2) of the B.N.S., rendering the …
The applicant Rajesh filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2025) alleging involvement under several IPC sections. No counsel appeared for the applicant or the informant, though the State's A.G.A. was present. The court observed that the passage of time had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaarad Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 89 of 2026) involving alleged assault, use of a country‑made pistol and iron rod, and injuries to the complainant. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pramod, accused in Crime No. 245 of 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and related IPC provisions. Pramod claimed he was falsely implicated, that no specific overt act was attributed to him, and highlighted that a co‑accused had already …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Sushma Giri and 36 co‑accused who were named in FIR No. 36 of 2021 for offences under numerous IPC sections, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and the Prevention of Damages to Public …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt Mala Tiwari, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 376D, 354‑C, 342, 506, 323, 120B/34 of the IPC and Sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the informant had a …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita filed by the accused Navajis, who was charged under Sections 70(1), 123, 351(2) and 87 for alleged kidnapping, rape and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the victim was …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Malti Devi under Section 482 CrPC in a case where a charge‑sheet had already been filed for the alleged suicide of a deceased woman. The applicant claimed innocence, cooperation with the investigation, and highlighted that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhagwandin Shukla, who was implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant had previously been granted limited anticipatory bail …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Seema, who was alleged to have abetted the suicide of her sister‑in‑law under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that she was innocent, that the FIR was lodged with an unexplained delay, and that there was no …
The applicant, Sameer @ Gulam Mauhiddin, was implicated in a criminal case (Cr. No. 382 of 2026) alleging rape based on a false promise of marriage, with the complainant a 37‑year‑old widow who had maintained a consensual relationship with him for about a year. The applicant contended that the FIR …
Smt. Urmila filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act in a criminal case. She later requested to withdraw this application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court. The State, represented by the A.G., raised no …
Shayam Singh alias Swatantra Singh applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The High Court initially granted interim anticipatory bail on 24‑11‑2025 with a personal bond and several conditions, noting the applicant's claim of a cross‑case and lack of …
The applicant, Tannu Singh, was charged under several IPC sections in a criminal case and filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …
The applicant, Lovkush Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead file a regular bail application before …
Santosh Kumar Mittal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a rape case where the complainant, a 49‑year‑old woman, alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual and lasted six years, and that the FIR was …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajneesh Mishra (alias Vikas Mishra) in a criminal case involving alleged rape, sections 64, 351(3) BNS and 67 of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations stemmed from a consensual …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Khushbu, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have died by dowry‑related poisoning. The FIR, lodged a week after the incident, implicated the applicant based on a dying declaration that named her as the person …
The applicants, Adalat Sharma and Shiv Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging their involvement in the suicide of a relative under Sections 85 and 108 of the BNS Act, with the prosecution charging them under Section 306 IPC. They argued that the FIR was filed after an unexplained delay, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Vishal Singh, who was accused of rape under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) IPC. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship of eight years, and asserted innocence. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application filed by Gaurav Singh after a chargesheet was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, who was 22 days short of turning 18, had not implicated him in any assault and …
The applicant, charged under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC in Crime No.510 of 2023, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 BNSS after being declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 CrPC/84 BNSS. The State opposed, arguing that the proclamation and the …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Ram Vilash Yadav in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, through counsel Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested …
The applicant, Ramashray Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, represented by Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested to withdraw the application and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mahendra Pal under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 347 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 352, 109(1) and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The applicant Kaif sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming innocence and alleging that the FIR is vague and not maintainable. The State opposed, arguing that the applicant is a gang member …
Vinod Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he is falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record except one case where he is already on bail. The State opposed, alleging he is a gang member …
Manorma Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code after a prior order denying bail under the SC/ST Act. The State's Additional Government Advocate argued that the anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable because the correct remedy was an appeal under Section …
Saroj Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Cr.P.C. §§438/482 after an earlier order rejecting bail under the SC/ST Act. The State objected, arguing that the correct remedy was an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, citing the decision in Kailash v. State …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC by Mohd Wasim, who feared arrest in a criminal case (Crime No 158 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 110, 352, 351(2) and 117(2) of the BNSS. The State’s Additional Advocate General objected, …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Darshan Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly forging documents to obtain a teaching post. The applicant claimed innocence, cited a prior stay of arrest and the fact that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Prashant Sharma, who was alleged to be involved in offences under various IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed innocence and cited that co‑accused had been …
The applicants, Rajendra Singh and two others, were charged in a 1999 case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 470 and 471. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Subsequently, they sought to withdraw that application and instead file a regular bail petition, …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 212 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 351(3), 74, 76 and 333 of the BNSS. The State opposed, arguing that the offences do not attract a …
The applicant, Ajad Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 508 of 2025). He later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court, asking …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Anash, who was implicated in a rape case arising from a broken consensual relationship where the complainant alleged a false promise of marriage. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted the lack of medical evidence, the …
The applicant, Ramjeet, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Intakhab under Section 482 CrPC in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that his inclusion in the FIR was based solely on the confessional …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, invoking Sections 85 and 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, in a criminal case registered at Bijnor. During the hearing, the senior counsel for the applicants sought to …
The applicant, Raheema, was implicated in a case where her husband was found dead, allegedly after an altercation with her. The FIR, lodged nine days after the incident by the mother‑in‑law, accused Raheema of causing the death, which was later treated as a suicide and the charge was upgraded to …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Karmveer in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged after a long delay and …
The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Ashish Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC, relating to offences under various sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead seek regular bail …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vishnu Prasad, who was charged with murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and related offences and had been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pledged cooperation, while the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Maqbool, who was implicated in a case under several sections of the B.N.S. alleging ransom demand and other offences. Maqbool contended that the allegations were false, that he had no role in the incident, and cited prior acquittals …
Pawan Gupta filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act in Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead move a …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in connection with Crime No. 192 of 2026. The applicant had earlier obtained a stay on his arrest through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, which was ordered to remain in …
The applicant, Smt Reena, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in connection with Crime No. 192 of 2026. The applicant had earlier obtained a stay on her arrest through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, which was ordered to …
Vidya Devi filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 167 of 2026) invoking Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. She later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court. The …
The applicant Shivam filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 192 of 2026. The applicant had earlier obtained a stay on her arrest through a writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 18968 of …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Varun Singh (also known as Arvind Kumar Singh) under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act in a case where the deceased had allegedly committed suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Naresh under Section 105 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.274 of 2026) where he was alleged to be involved in the death of an informant's wife. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of mens rea, delayed FIR …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Preeti @ Ruby under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) alleging her involvement in the death of a woman. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was based on false allegations and …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amod Kumar, who was charged under sections 69, 352, 351(2) and 115(2) of the IPC for alleged rape. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship and a broken promise of marriage, and argued …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Uvais, who was implicated in a case under Sections 64(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for alleged misconduct with a 19‑year‑old woman who had previously been married and divorced. The applicant asserted that the relationship was …
The applicant, Shahjadi @ Gudiya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 115(2), 108 and 351(3) of the BNSS in a criminal case (Crime No. 321 of 2026). The applicant had earlier obtained a stay of arrest through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18857 of 2026) pending a …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Kakkar, who is residing in Canada, in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 454 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in …
The applicant, Mukesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in a rape case (Cr. No. 678 of 2024) alleging that the FIR was false, filed after a long‑term consensual relationship turned sour. He argued that the victim, a 21‑year‑old, had been in a relationship with him for seven years, that they were …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vikas Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with Complaint Case No. 2452 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 323, 307/34, and 506. The applicant claimed false implication, had no prior criminal record, and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vaheed under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a complaint (S.T. No. 38 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 386, 392 and 506 IPC. Vaheed claimed he was falsely implicated and had already been granted …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Kapil Upadhyaya in a case registered under Sections 69, 70(1), 115(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a 23‑day delay in filing the FIR, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Alsaba @ Saba Parveen in Crime No. 786 of 2025, alleging false implication in offences including extortion and a honey‑trap scheme. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a delayed FIR and an earlier complaint she had lodged …
The applicant, Veeresh, was named in an FIR dated 07.05.2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and false implication. The prosecution opposed, arguing a prima facie case based on the injury report, FIR, and witness …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Section 307 IPC and Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and the learned Additional Government …
Abhishek Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking protection from arrest in a criminal proceeding initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The applicant was represented by senior advocates …
The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Anamika Singh and Abhishek Singh in a case arising from a family dispute over ancestral property, where both parties had lodged FIRs against each other. The prosecution alleged assault and minor injuries under Sections 115(2), 352, …
The applicant sought quashing of the trial court's order rejecting his application under Section 528 BNSS (equivalent to Section 311 CrPC) for further cross‑examination of a child victim in a POCSO case. The High Court examined whether the power to recall a witness could be exercised when the …
The applicant, Ashish, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking bail in two criminal matters pending before the Budhana police stations. He had been incarcerated since 9 April 2026 and was unable to furnish two separate sureties for each case due to poverty. The applicant …
The applicant, Firoz, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 17 January 2024 issued by the Additional District Judge, Agra, for his alleged non‑appearance in a trial concerning offences under Sections 302 and 147 of …
Suraj Harijan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 11244 of 2023) instituted against him for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was originally lodged for offences under Sections 452 and 354, …
The appellant Nand Kishore appealed against the acquittal of the respondents in a complaint under Sections 494 and 109 of the IPC by the 1st Additional Munsif Magistrate, Aligarh. No counsel appeared for the appellant during the revised call. The appellant died, and his legal heirs declined to …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.595/9 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 376‑D and 506 IPC. The court examined the prayer and, instead of granting a quash, directed that if the …
The applicants (Nafis and two others) filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No.628/9 of 2017 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar, arising from offences under Sections 376‑D and 506 IPC. They also requested that, if they …
The applicants, Sarthak Kaushik and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call, while the State's counsel was present. The court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, relying on this statement, dismissed the application as infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were …
The applicant, Basant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel repeatedly sought adjournments, and the cause of action appears to have become moot. On the day of the hearing, no counsel appeared for the …
The applicant, Amir Ansari, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 5 March 2021 that framed charges against him in a trial for offences under Sections 376, 354‑D, 506 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petition was filed on 8 …
The applicant, Nagendra Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking quashal of the order that rejected his discharge application in a rape case. He alleged that the FIR was false, he was elsewhere in his shop (supported by CCTV), and that the prosecution had not conducted a …
The applicants, Nidhi Rawat and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the quashing of a chargesheet dated 25‑11‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 28‑02‑2025 in a case (Crime No. 502 of 2024) involving offences under IPC §§ 323, 504, 506, 376 and POCSO §§ 3, 4. The …
The applicant, Mantosh Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking relief concerning a birth certificate issued on 21‑11‑2023. The State’s Additional Government Advocate was directed to verify the authenticity of the certificate. The AGA’s compliance report concluded …
The applicant, Vijay Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 29‑03‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 13‑09‑2024 in a criminal case (Case No. 16384 of 2024) involving offences under various IPC sections. He contended that the investigation …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.115 of 2005, Crime No.155 of 2024) that were pending under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant and the victim had married on …
The applicant Dinesh Kumar sought quashing of the pending Sessions case No. 778 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC, on the ground that he and the victim had entered into a compromise on 29‑08‑2025, later verified by the trial court. The victim, who was the key prosecution …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS. The High Court dismissed the application. The judgment refers the parties to an earlier order dated in Application u/s 528 BNSS No. 47865 of 2025 (Akhilesh vs. State of U.P. and another).
The applicants filed applications under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑06‑2025, the summoning order dated 06‑08‑2025, and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 117 of 2025) relating to alleged offences including rape. The applicants contended that the FIR did …
Kapil Upadhyay filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 14‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 17‑09‑2025 in a gang‑rape case (Case No. 19382 of 2025). The applicant argued that the FIR was false, the victim was in a consensual relationship, and …
The applicant, Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a remand order dated 22 August 2025. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, raised a preliminary objection that the application had become infructuous because a charge …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a warrant, notice and order dated 02‑12‑2024 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 376, 366, 363 IPC and Section …
The applicant Lokendra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Session Judge's order dated 16‑03‑2026 that rejected his request to place a newspaper dated 28‑03‑2022 on record. The trial court had already heard the defence and was about to pronounce judgment in a …
The applicant Sonu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial (No.320 of 2016) for offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO sections 3 and 4. He asserted that he had married the victim in 2016, they have two children, and the victim and her …
The applicant, Chandrakesh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Session Trial No. 1195 of 2026, alleging that the case against him rests solely on extra‑judicial confessions and lacks any other evidence. The State opposed, …
The applicant, Nikky Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicant, Abhishek Pratap Singh, appeared before Justice Vivek Kumar Singh. During the …
The applicant, Akash Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the pending POCSO trial (Session Trial No. 456 of 2017) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Ranjeet Kumar and others seeking to quash criminal proceedings instituted under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 120‑B and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicants demonstrated that the alleged victim had married …
The applicant, Vikas Babu, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 342, 504, 506, 376D and IT Act section 67. He contended that the FIR was lodged …
The applicants, Bajrang Lal Dubey and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants argued that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission that the relief sought was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.25957 of 2025) pending against them for offences under Sections 69, 89 and 115(2) of the BNSS. The key factual matrix is that applicant No.3 married the victim (opposite party No.2) on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 15‑11‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 29‑01‑2024 in a murder case (Sections 302 and 120‑B IPC) pending before the Additional District and Session Judge, Meerut. The applicant alleged that the …
The applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 674 of 2025) that arose from a matrimonial dispute which had been converted into offences under Sections 87, 351(2), 64(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The parties, including the son‑in‑law of the opposing party, had reached a …
The applicant Shahrukh, charged under the POCSO Act for offences alleged in case crime No. 980 of 2024, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and cognizance order. He asserted that he had married the victim on 04‑10‑2024, that they were living together …
The applicant, Rakesh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The applicant sought dismissal of the application on the ground that it was not pressed. The learned …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of criminal proceedings (Case No. 774 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 377, 376, 504, 323 and 313 IPC. The dispute stemmed from a matrimonial relationship that ended in a mutual divorce and a compromise …
The applicants, Imran Ali and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 02‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Bareilly, in a case involving offences under the IPC, POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and the Uttar …
The applicant, Ajay Mohan, was charged under the POCSO Act and several sections of the B.N.S. for offences arising from case crime no. 323 of 2025. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and the entire Special Case No.120 of 2025, …
The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a POCSO case alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 506, 376 and POCSO sections 6/8. The applicant asserted that he had married the victim in 2017, that two …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 10‑02‑2026 that directed the consolidation of two separate offences arising from different case‑crime numbers for joint trial. The applicant argued that the offences were distinct and could not be tried …
The applicant, Jitendra @ Lukka @ Lukka Don, was incarcerated since 25‑12‑2024 on five separate criminal matters pending before the Bareilly courts. He sought bail under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. but could not furnish the two sureties required in each case due to poverty. The applicant relied on a …
The applicant, Shyampal, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑03‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj, in a criminal case (Cr. No. 252 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 363 and 376 IPC. The applicant contended …
The applicant, Amit Kumar Paswan, was charged in a Session Trial for offences under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He married the victim on 17 June 2025, and the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC indicated no allegation against him and expressed love for …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 458 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 70(1), 127(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, on the ground that a verified compromise had been reached with the victim. The trial court had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 04‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑10‑2024 in a POCSO case (Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act). They claimed they were …
The applicant, Mohd. Salman Sheikh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.3059 of 2025, alleging that he had married the victim and that a compromise had been reached and verified by the trial court. The opposite party admitted the marriage, and the …
The applicant Arvind Prajapati filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 538 of 2024) arising from FIR No. 563 of 2023 alleging offences under IPC sections 363 and 366 and the POCSO Act. The applicant proved that he had married the victim …
The applicant Zainul Abdeen filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of Criminal Case No. 16813 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 69, 88, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. A fresh compromise between the applicant and the victim was verified by the trial court on …
The applicant, Rajendra Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the trial proceedings and orders dated 04.04.2025 and 15.05.2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, on the ground that the alleged offence occurred in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, and therefore the …
The applicant, Mohd. Ikram, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd. Ikram) involving offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the prosecutrix had married on 16 December 2025, and …
The applicant, Mandeep, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 24‑04‑2025 in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 376‑D, 354, 504, 506 and 120‑B IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged …
The applicant, Anil Barar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.655 of 2016, which alleged offences of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He asserted that he married the victim in …
The applicant, Nadeem Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 143 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant had married the victim on 29 January 2024, a fact documented …
The applicant, Gaurav Gautam, was facing trial under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. He and the victim had married on 19 October 2022, had a child, and executed a compromise deed. Both parties, including the victim, admitted the marriage and the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 213 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under Sections 376, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicants proved that the accused had …
The applicant Gopal filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 376D IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The appellant Kalwa filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. However, an office report dated 27 January 2026, based on a letter from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur dated 8 January 2026, revealed that Kalwa had died in the year 2000. The court examined whether the appeal could …
The appellant, Om Prakash Ruiya, filed a criminal appeal (No. 3209 of 1984) before the Allahabad High Court. An office report dated 09 March 2026, based on a letter from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar dated 07 March 2026, informed the court that the sole appellant had died. The court …
The applicant, Dilshad Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 3096 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 376, 493, 504, 506 and 323 IPC. He argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC did …
The applicant, Ramu Chauhan, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for offences arising from a 2021 crime. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire Sessions case, asserting that he had married the victim on 6 May 2022, …
