Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
237 judgments · newest first · showing 201–237
The applicant, Tej Pratap Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.11188 of 2025) for an alleged rape under Section 376 IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than a year after the incident, that the victim had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a Special Sessions Trial for offences under Sections 64(1) and 115(2) of the BNSS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. They asserted that the accused (applicant No.1) had married the …
The applicant, Ajay Chauhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑11‑2023, the summoning order dated 18‑12‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No.1159 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special S.T. No.384 of 2023) against Mahendra alias Sonu Rajbhar and others for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The …
The applicant, Tinku alias Ram Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No.27 of 2000, Crime No.52 of 2016) pending before the Special Judge, POCSO Court, Bareilly, which were based on IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and …
The applicant, Shivam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Praveen Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. The court considered whether the …
The applicant Sonu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Cr. No.9 of 2024) pending before the Special Judge (POCSO) in Bareilly, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Govind Chauhan and two relatives seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Sessions Case No.510 of 2022) arising from offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicants …
The applicant, Imtiyaz Ahmad alias Raju Pilot, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of the charge and discharge in a POCSO case alleging sexual assault of a minor. He contended that the FIR was delayed, the victim was over 18, and no evidence supported the charge. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 95 of 2018, which involved charges of kidnapping, criminal intimidation, attempt to murder and rape under IPC sections 365, 504, 506, 376 and offences under the POCSO Act. They asserted that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the request …
The applicant, Hasan Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the counsel's statement and found no merit in …
The applicant, Pappy @ Israr Hussain, was charged under Sections 376, 363, 354A and 506 IPC for a crime registered in 2014. After a ten‑year prosecution phase, the trial court closed the window for the accused to adduce defence evidence on 6 January 2026 and rejected his recall application on 28 …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection against alleged threats from respondents. They asserted that their marriage on 16‑02‑2026 was consensual, without any FIR, and that they were being …
The petitioners, an unmarried couple living together in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection. The petitioners alleged harassment by family members and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and subsequent proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Special Case No. 77 of 2015. The basis of the …
Petitioners Smt. Sukhiya Kumari and another filed a writ petition seeking police protection for their life and liberty. No petitioner appeared before the court, and the standing counsel for the State submitted a police report stating that the petitioners had earlier declared they faced no threat and …
Vrs Foods Ltd. filed an application under Section 528 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, seeking to quash an order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the Nyaya Nirrayak Adhikari/Additional District Magistrate in a case under Section 26(2) of the Act. The State, through the learned A.G.A., raised a …
The applicants, Preeti Soni and another, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and related proceedings under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, alleging that the dispute had been settled by compromise on 7‑Oct‑2025. The …
Sunil Yadav constructed an eight‑foot wall on government land (Gata Nos. 60 and 642) in Baruasagar, Jhansi, leading to an FIR for offences under Section 447 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to …
The applicant, Sonu Raidas, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 7‑Feb‑2017 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway Prayagraj, in connection with a trial under Section 153 of the Railway Act (Case No. …
The applicant, Karan Jaat, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking bail in seven criminal cases pending before the Agra courts, arguing that he could not furnish separate sureties for each case due to poverty. He had been in custody since May 2023 and a prior bail order dated …
The applicant, Smt Shahnaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 23 January 2023 and the cognizance order dated 29 September 2023 in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act. The High Court noted that the charges against the …
The applicant, Govind Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 29‑08‑2024 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Chakiya, Chandauli, along with the accompanying charge‑sheet in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (Gangster Act) in a case under the Gangster Act. The warrant was issued because the applicant failed to appear on …
Lakshmi Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Rules seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.464 of 2020) for alleged theft of electricity under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Electricity Department produced a letter dated 04.04.2018 showing that the offence …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. The court noted that the marriage was solemnized with free consent and no FIR had been lodged. Relying …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. They claimed their marriage on 28‑02‑2026 was consensual, with no FIR filed, and alleged …
The petitioners, Smt. Khushbu and another, married on 29 November 2025 and alleged that the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents were threatening and harassing them for having married. They sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police …
The applicant, Sushil, has been incarcerated since 13 November 2025 in ten separate criminal cases filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. Being indigent, he is unable to furnish the twenty sureties normally required for bail in each case. He previously obtained a …
The petitioners, Samreen and another, married on 18 March 2024 and registered the marriage the next day, alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents were threatening and harassing them for having married. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not …
The applicant, Mohd. Moinuddin Ajmeri, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge‑sheet dated 16‑12‑2018, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑08‑2021 and a bailable warrant dated 20‑02‑2025 in Criminal Case No.121 of 2021, which arose …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 11‑01‑2026, the cognizance order dated 07‑02‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 400 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 566 of 2025. The FIR alleged offences under …
The petitioners, Muskan Singh and another, married on 16-02-2026 and alleged harassment by the State of Uttar Pradesh authorities for exercising their right to marry. They sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and requested police protection. Relying on Supreme …
The petitioners, Smt. Naazreen Begum and another, filed a writ petition (WRIT C No. 363 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no respondent appeared or filed any response, even after the …
The applicant Ramlakhan Jaiswal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 22‑01‑2026 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 14(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging attachment of his property on …
The petitioners, a 21‑year‑old woman and a 20‑year‑old man, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life, alleging threats from the woman's father. The State argued that the marriage was void or voidable under the Prohibition of Child Marriage …
