Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Y K SRIVASTAVA

262 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

MAHENDRA SINGHversusSMT. DIPALI

Mahendra Singh, a tenant, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the eviction and rent-arrears decree dated 19‑02‑2024 passed by the Small Causes Court, Budaun, and its affirmation by the District Judge on 04‑02‑2026. He sought an extension of time to vacate the premises until 30 March 2027, …

SMT POONAM AND 3 OTHERSversusARVIND KUMAR

The petitioners, Smt Poonam and three others, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 550 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the application. The respondent, Arvind Kumar, was represented by counsel. The Court observed that the …

OM SINGHversusSAPNA

Om Singh filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant was represented by counsel Rakesh Kumar Rathore and Sanjeev Kumar. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. Consequently, …

SMT. MAHIMAversusRANA TRANSPORT COMPANY AND 2 OTHER

The applicant, Smt. Mahima, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Anoop Kumar, subsequently sought to withdraw the application. Respondent No.3, represented by Anubhav Sinha, expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The court noted the withdrawal and the …

SMT. NISHI MASSEYversusPRATYUSH SOLOMAN

The applicant, Smt. Nishi Massey, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 222 of 2023 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant's counsel, Amitesh Kumar Srivastava, Kailash Chandra, and Pradep Kumar, appeared, but the opposite party's counsel, Rajiv Kumar Pandey, was present. …

JAGATVIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jagatvir, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the proceedings of a trial court. The petition was listed as likely to be infructuous. An office report dated 05‑09‑2026 indicated that the trial court proceedings from which the petition arose had been …

RANVEER SINGHversusTHE CO-OPERATIVE ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Ranveer Singh filed a revision petition (S.C.C. Revision No. 17 of 2024) against The Co-Operative Assurance Company Limited in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was listed in the revised list and was to be heard by Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. Counsel for the …

ASHWINI KUMAR AGARWALversusSMT. UTTAM AGARWAL AND ANOTHER

Ashwini Kumar Agarwal filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court against Smt. Uttam Agarwal and another. The petition was listed in Court No. 35 and counsel for the parties were recorded. No appearance was made by the revisionist to press the revision. Consequently, the court …

SMT. PRIYA @ GUDIYAversusSUBHASH KUMAR

Smt. Priya @ Gudiya filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 253 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. The applicant's counsel was listed as Abhay Mishra, Ajay Kumar Pal and Vikrant Pratap Singh, while the opposite party was represented by Vivek Chaturvedi. No counsel …

SMT. SONVATI ALIAS SONAMversusUDDYESHE

The applicant, Smt. Sonvati Alias Sonam, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 347 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court found that the application was not prosecuted. The Court dismissed the transfer …

SMT. PUSHPA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusDR. SATISH KUMAR VERMA

Petitioners Smt. Pushpa Devi and two others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against Dr. Satish Kumar Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents, and the petitioners themselves failed to appear or present any …

SUDHA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusARUN KUMAR AGARWAL AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Sudha Devi and others filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the respondents Arun Kumar Agarwal and another. The petition was listed in Court No. 35 and was to be heard on September 23, 2026. No counsel …

MOHAN CHANDRAversusAWDHESH KUMAR

Mohan Chandra filed a revision petition against Awdhesh Kumar in the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to prosecute the revision. The Court dismissed the revision petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. No substantive merits of the dispute …

MADHURIversusDEEPNARAYAN

Madhuri filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Deepnarayan. The applicant's counsel did not appear to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. No …

SHASHI SRIVASTAVAversusSMT. SUSHILA DEVI AND 2 OTHERS

The petition under Article 227 was filed by Shashi Srivastava seeking relief against Smt. Sushila Devi and others. The petition was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 35, before Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner …

PRIYANKAversusAMAN KUMAR

The applicant, Priyanka, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to shift the proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application before the hearing. The court noted the absence of prosecution of the application. …

DR MANOJ AGRAWALversusMADHAVLAL CHATURVEDI AND 2 OTHERS

The petition under Article 227 challenged an order of the Additional District Judge, Mathura, which had set aside a 2010 order rejecting a landlord's application under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Act No.13 of 1972 and allowed a release application. The petitioner, a tenant, contended that …

BANNEY QURAISHIversusSMT CHUNNI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide a rent case (Rent Case No.12 of 2011 / New Rent Case No.1719 of 2022) within a stipulated time. The petitioner alleged that …

AVINASH CHANDRA GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusRAJ KUMAR SAHU URF RAJU

The petitioners, Avinash Chandra Gupta and others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Allahabad, to dispose of Suit No. 50 of 2015 within a stipulated period. They alleged that despite numerous dates being fixed since the suit was …

LALIT CHATURVEDIversusSANTOSHI LAL CHATURVEDI ADOPTED AND 4 OTHERS

The revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 challenged the Small Causes Court’s order rejecting an application for impleadment filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC. The applicant, claiming to be the Shebait/Mohatmin of a Hindu deity, sought to be joined so that the …

MASERS RAJASTHAN MOTORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Messrs Rajasthan Motors, a tenant, challenged an order of the Additional District Judge that directed it to deposit fifty percent of the monthly rent during the pendency of its appeal against a rent determination order. The petitioner argued that a one‑time pre‑deposit made at the time of filing the …

MESERS HIND WHEELSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Messrs Hind Wheels, a tenant, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an order of the Additional District Judge that, in an appeal, directed it to deposit 50% of the monthly rent despite having already made the statutory pre‑deposit under Section 35(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban …

MESERS CARMENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Messrs Carmen, a tenant, challenged an order of the Additional District Judge that directed it to deposit 50% of the monthly rent while an appeal was pending. The petitioner argued that it had already made the statutory pre‑deposit required under Section 35(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of …

SMT. PREETI DEVIversusMANOJ KUMAR @ MONU

The applicant, Smt. Preeti Devi, filed a transfer application seeking to move a matrimonial suit (Case No. 2945 of 2023) filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, from the Family Court in Kanpur Nagar to the Family Court in Fatehpur. She alleged hardship in attending proceedings in …

PALLAVI SINGH @ KSHAMA YADAVversusSHRI ABHISHEK KUMAR YADAV

The applicant, Pallavi Singh @ Kshama Yadav, filed a transfer application (civil) No. 437 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No substantive material or pleadings were filed by the applicant to press the application. The opposite party, represented by Gaurav …

DHARMENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dharmendra Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9504 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Akanksha Gaur, informed the court that subsequent developments had eliminated any surviving cause of …

SMT. NEERAJ KUMARIversusPRADEEP GAUTAM

Smt. Neeraj Kumari filed Transfer Application (Civil) No. 642 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit against Pradeep Gautam. The applicant’s counsel argued that the matter should be transferred, while the opposite party’s counsel contended that subsequent developments …

RAKESH KUMAR GARGversusADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the proceedings of a trial court. The trial court had already concluded its proceedings, as indicated by an office report dated 14 July 2026. The High Court observed that because the trial court proceedings were …

MUDASSAR AHMAD AND 3 OTHERversusMOHD. KASIM

The applicants, Mudassar Ahmad and three others, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 512 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. Subsequently, counsel for the applicants, Vinod Kumar Tripathi, moved before the court to withdraw the transfer application, stating that …

ROLI GUPTAversusALOK KUMAR GUPTA

Roli Gupta filed a civil transfer application (No. 548 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Alok Kumar Gupta. The applicant, through counsel, later informed the court that due to subsequent developments, he no longer wished to pursue the transfer. The court …

AVINASH CHANDRA GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusRAJ KUMAR SAHU URF RAJU AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, claiming to be landlords, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Prayagraj to dispose of a pending civil suit (P.A. Case No. 06 of 2015) filed on 6 October 2015 under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Act No. 13 …

KUNAL RASTOGI AND ANOTHERversusM/S. AWANTIKA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Kunal Rastogi and another, who are landlords, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 14, Varanasi, to dispose of Rent Appeal No. 203 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The appeal arose from Rent Case No. 2340 of …

SMT. RUCHIKA MISHRAversusANUPAM PANDEY

The applicant, Smt. Ruchika Mishra, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared for the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, that had been …

RAMESHWAR DAYALversusHAR NATH SINGH

The petitioner, Rameshwar Dayal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that there was nothing for it to consider and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that may …

PHOOL KUMAR SAINIversusMAHENDRA SINGH SAINI

Phool Kumar Saini filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 27534 of 2012) before the Allahabad High Court against Mahendra Singh Saini. The petition was listed but the petitioner failed to appear or otherwise prosecute the petition. The Court observed that there was no appearance to press the petition. …

SMT. BHARATI GUPTAversusSRI SHANKAR SAHAI BAJPAYEE

The petitioner, Smt. Bharati Gupta, filed a revision under S.C.C. Revision Defective No. 166 of 2016 seeking condonation of delay in a civil matter. An application for condoning the delay (Application No. 239934 of 2016) was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the …

NARENDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusGANGA RAM

The petitioner Narendra Kumar Jaiswal filed writ petition No. 24372 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against respondent Ganga Ram. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioner was Rajesh Kumar Mishra. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel to press …

SUBHASH CHANDRAversusANZAR ALI

Subhash Chandra filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 51080 of 2012) before the Allahabad High Court against Anzar Ali. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the case. Consequently, the Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. The Court …

SHAGUFTA PARVEEN AND ORS.versusADDL.DISTRICT JUDGE AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed Writ A No. 11447 of 2013 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. No substantive …

SMT.USHA GUPTAversusSMT.URMILA SHUKLA AND ORS.

Smt. Usha Gupta filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 12464 of 2013) against Smt. Urmila Shukla and others in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. The earlier …

GOPAL PRASAD SHARMAversusBHARAT KUMAR VERMA AND OTHERS

The petitioners, Gopal Prasad Sharma, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 13199 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, Bharat Kumar Verma and others. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioners, Ajay Kumar Pathak and Kripa Shanker Singh, were …

SMT. ASGHARI KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusGAYA PRASAD

The revision petition filed by Smt. Asghari Khatoon and another against Gaya Prasad was heard before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners failed to prosecute the revision, and consequently the court dismissed the revision for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that …

SMT. PALLAVI VERMAversusSRI SACHIN VERMA

The applicant, Smt. Pallavi Verma, filed a transfer application under Section 13(1)(1a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking to move her divorce proceedings from the Family Court in Gautam Buddh Nagar to the Family Court in Aligarh. She resides in Aligarh with her minor daughter and aged …

MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSMT. SHEELA DEVI

Manoj Kumar and another filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter. The revision was listed but the revisionists failed to appear before the court. The opposite party, represented by Rahul Sahai, was present. The court held that the delay condonation application could not be …

SHIV SHANKAR KHANDELWALversusRAJ KISHORE KODESIA

The revision petition filed by Shiv Shankar Khandelwal against Raj Kishore Kodesia was heard before the Allahabad High Court. The counsel for the petitioner, Bhaskar Bhadra and Pankaj Agarwal, informed the court that there were no further instructions in the case. The court found no grounds to …

WASEEM KHAN ALIAS PAPPU KHAN AND 18 OTHERSversusDR. SUDHA RANI AND 10 OTHERS

The revisionist filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in an application (No. 343830 of 2017). The court noted that no counsel appeared to press the application on behalf of the revisionist. The opposite party's counsel was present. Since the revisionist failed to prosecute the application, …

ANEES AHMAD KHANversusBHARAT SINGH SHARMA DECEASED AND 6 OTHERS

A revision petition (No. 119 of 2017) was filed by Anees Ahmad Khan against the deceased Bharat Singh Sharma and six others, seeking condonation of delay under application No. 347870 of 2017. The matter was listed in the revised list, but the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The High …

NAZMA SIDDIQUIversusKAUSHLESH KUMAR SINGH

The petitioners Nazma Siddiqui filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter. The revision application (No. 219144 of 2015) was listed but the petitioners failed to appear before the court. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the application by the revisionist. …

SHRI MAN SINGHversusSMT. GURMEET KAUR

The petitioners filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in a pending application. The revisionist, Shri Man Singh, was represented by counsel Rajesh Gupta. No appearance was made by the revisionist to press the application before the High Court. The court observed that the delay condonation …

PAWAN KUMAR JAINversusRAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA

A revision petition was filed by Pawan Kumar Jain against Ramesh Chandra Gupta. The petitioners were represented by counsel Adarsh Bhushan and R.K. Singh Gaharwar, while the opposite party was represented by Chandra Bhan Gupta. No substantive material or prosecution was presented by the petitioners …

KM. LUXAMI KANAUJIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Km. Luxami Kanaujiya against the State of U.P. and others was listed as likely to be infructuous. The High Court, after noting this, dismissed the petition. The court observed that if any cause of action still survives, the aggrieved party may move an appropriate application …

SMT. MUNNI DEVIversusMUNNA LAL AND 2 ORS.

Smt. Munni Devi filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against Munna Lal and two others. The petitioner was represented by counsel Manish Tandon and Vivek Srivastava. The respondent’s counsel was Prashant Mishra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner stated that …

DR. VIJAY KUMAR SAHUversusSMT. PREMA PATHAK AND ANOTHER

Dr. Vijay Kumar Sahu filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in his application No. 57546 of 2017. The revision was listed but the revisionist failed to appear before the court. The court held that without any prosecution of the application, it could not be entertained. Consequently, the delay …

SEWAPAL NARANG AND ANOTHERversusTARUN KUMAR SETHI

A petition under Article 227 was filed by Sewapal Narang and another against Tarun Kumar Sethi. The petitioners failed to appear or press the petition before the court. The respondent's counsel, Komal Mehrotra, was present. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition. …

LOKESH KUMARversusVINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Lokesh Kumar filed a writ petition in 2010 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was only taken up in 2025, and no party appeared to pursue the petition. The court observed that the petition, being one of the oldest in its jurisdiction and lacking any party to press it, was either rendered …

GIRRAJ KISHOR GUPTAversusSMT. ANITA VARSHNEYA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Girraj Kishor Gupta filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that there was nothing for it to consider and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order …

RAKHI RAIversusNITISH KUMAR BHARDWAJ

The applicant, Rakhi Rai, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. Both parties reached a settlement and the applicant expressed a desire to discontinue the proceedings. The opposite party, represented by Santosh Kumar Jaiswal, raised no objection to the settlement. The court noted …

SMT. PARULversusAMAN PRATAP SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Parul, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. Both parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the applicant expressed a desire not to pursue the matter further. The counsel for the applicant informed the court of this development. The court considered that …

SMT. ABHILASHA TIWARIversusASHISH CHAUBEY

Smt. Abhilasha Tiwari filed a transfer application seeking to move her matrimonial suit (Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act) from the Family Court in Varanasi to the Family Court in Ballia, citing hardship in attending proceedings due to lack of income and distance. The opposite party, Ashish …

DIMPLE TOMARversusVipin Kumar

The applicant, Dimple Tomar, filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court seeking to move the suit to another court. The High Court examined the application and observed that the applicant's counsel had not complied with the procedural steps required for such an …

SMT HUSNA BANOversusSRI ATIKUR REHMAN KHAN

Smt. Husna Bano filed a revision petition against Sri Atikur Rehman Khan. The petition was presented before the Allahabad High Court, but the revisionist failed to appear or prosecute the petition. The court noted that no steps were taken to press the revision. Consequently, the revision was …

SMT PRIYANKA SINGHversusANUJ SINGH

Smt. Priyanka Singh filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared for the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive …

SMT. SHWATIversusVIVEK UPADHYAY

Smt. Shwati filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 501 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No appearance was made by the applicant to press the application. The Court observed that there was no prosecution of the application and consequently dismissed it. The …

SACHIN JAIN AND ANOTHERversusSATISH KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sachin Jain and another, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been in force was …

SMT PRAVESH CHAWLA AND 3 OTHERSversusSUNITA MARVAH AND ANOTHER

Smt Pravesh Chawla and three others filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court against Sunita Marvah and another. The petitioners' counsel, Akhtar Ali, did not present any substantive grounds or evidence for the revision. Consequently, the Court found that there was no prosecution of …

CHINI KURAISHI AND 11 OTHERSversusWAQF MASZID ROTI WALAN

Chini Kuraishi and eleven other petitioners filed a revision application before the Allahabad High Court against Waqf Maszid Roti Walan. The petitioners were represented by counsel Tanzeel Ahmad and Yash Padia, while the opposite party was represented by Jawahir Yadav and Narendra Kumar. No …

DINESH NARAYAN DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusRAMRAJ PANDEY AND 10 OTHERS

Petitioners Dinesh Narayan Dubey and another filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

SAUMYA MISHRAversusVASUDEV SHARMA

The applicant, Saumya Mishra, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the opposite party, represented by Kamal Kumar Singh and Sudhir Kumar Mishra, was present. The court observed that the …

KOMAL DEVIversusPUSPRAJ SINGH

Komal Devi filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 899 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant was represented by counsel Ravindra Kumar, while the opposite party, Puspraj Singh, was represented by Shivam Singh. No appearance was made by the applicant to …

ANURAG AGARWALversusSUNIL GUPTA

The revision petition filed by Anurag Agarwal against Sunil Gupta was listed before the High Court but no appearance was made by the petitioner. The petitioner failed to prosecute the revision, and consequently, the court examined whether the revision could be entertained in the absence of any …

RAJESH AGARWALversusSMT. SUNITA JAIN AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajesh Agarwal and others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and only the respondents' counsel was present. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the …

RAJESH KUMAR AGARWALversusSMT. SUNITA JAIN AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar Agarwal and others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The respondents, Smt. Sunita Jain and others, were represented by counsel Sudeep …

BRIJKISHORE PALversusANIL KUMAR CHATURVEDI AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijkishore Pal, a tenant, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an eviction order and rent arrears order dated 20‑08‑2025 issued by the Rent Authority/Additional District Magistrate under Section 4(7) of the Uttar Pradesh Act No.16 of 2021, and a …

VISHWABANDHU GUPTAversusAJAY KUMAR SINGH

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner, Vishwabandhu Gupta, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge (Small Cause Court), Gorakhpur, to expedite the hearing of SCC Suit No.4 of 2023. The petitioner, claiming to be the landlord in the suit, alleged that …

SMT. BINDHESHWARI AND ANOTHERversusBHAINRAW PRASAD AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bindheshwari and another, landlords in SCC Suit No. 113 of 2003, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of the suit within a stipulated period due to extensive delays and hardship. They submitted the order sheet …

RAJESH KUMAR CHAURASIA AND 2 OTHERSversusSURESH KAPOOR AND 3 OTHERS

The plaintiff sought eviction of the defendants for alleged non‑payment of rent, claiming a subsisting tenancy despite an agreement to sell dated 24‑12‑2002. The defendants argued that the agreement and a purported letter of possession terminated the tenancy, invoking protection under Section 53‑A …

SMT JYOTI SHISHODIYAversusHEMANT RAGHAV

Smt. Jyoti Shishodiya filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1027 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. The application was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The court observed that the applicant's counsel had not taken the …

SMT ANSHIMA KHANversusATEEK AHMAD

Smt Anshima Khan filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Court Rules seeking to have the suit transferred. The High Court observed that the applicant’s counsel had not complied with the procedural steps required for such an application. No substantive merits of the transfer …

SMT. PRERNA RANAversusPARIKSHIT RANA

The applicant, Smt. Prerna Rana, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move a matrimonial suit (Case No. 1583 of 2023) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court in Muzaffarnagar to the Family Court in Shahjahanpur. She contended that she …

DILEEP KUMARversusVINOD KUMAR AND 7 OTHERS

The petition filed by Dileep Kumar against Vinod Kumar and seven others was listed before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227. The petitioner’s counsel, Anil Kumar Pathak and Chandra Pratap Singh, failed to appear before the court. The respondent’s counsel, Satyam Mishra, was present and …

HRIDESH KUMAR GUPTAversusVIPIN KUMAR

The petition filed by Hridesh Kumar Gupta under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner. The court observed that there was no appearance or action taken to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

ANKITA VERMAversusSARVESH KUMAR

The applicant, Ankita Verma, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. No further steps were taken to prosecute the application. The court observed that there was no appearance by the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the …

NEHA VERMAversusDHARM PRAKASH SONI

Neha Verma filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 586 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant was represented by counsel Mainuddin Ahamad, while the opposite party, Dharm Prakash Soni, was represented by Mohan Yadav. No appearance was made by the …

SMT. GUNJANversusADESH RANJAN

The applicant, Smt. Gunjan, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 597 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. The application was listed but no steps were taken by the applicant to prosecute the matter. The court observed that there was no appearance …

SMT. PROMILA SINGHversusANKIT

Smt. Promila Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 616 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court, seeking to move the suit against Ankit. The application was filed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The Court examined whether the applicant’s counsel had complied with the …

SMT SONIYA JAINversusVIKAS GUPTA

Smt Soniya Jain filed a transfer application in the High Court of Allahabad. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the opposite party's counsel, Devashish Mitra, was present. The court observed that the applicant failed to prosecute the application. Consequently, the transfer application was …

SMT. GEETAversusHARENDRA SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Geeta, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the application. Consequently, the transfer application was dismissed for …

SMT. SWATI BHATTversusAJEET SHARMA

Smt. Swati Bhatt filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 628 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No appearance was made by the applicant to press the application. The learned counsel for the opposite party, Utkarsh Khanna, was present. The Court observed that the …

SMT. LAKSHMI PALversusDURVESH KUMAR

The applicant, Smt. Lakshmi Pal, filed a transfer application (civil) seeking to move the suit to another court. The respondent, Durvesh Kumar, appeared through counsel. The court observed that the applicant failed to prosecute the application, as no steps were taken to press it forward. …

SMT. RICHA SRIVASTAVversusAKASH VIJAY SRIVASTAV

Smt. Richa Srivastav filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 656 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Akash Vijay Srivastav. The applicant's counsel, Ashish Kumar Pandey and Nandini Mishra, appeared, but the applicant herself did not appear to press the …

SMT. NITISHA BANSALversusDR. RAVI PRAKKASH GAUR

Smt. Nitisha Bansal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 666 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. The learned judge observed that there was no prosecution of the …

SARITAversusOMVEER SINGH

Sarita filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 793 of 2024 seeking to shift the pending suit against Omveer Singh to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted. Consequently, the court …

SMT. POOJAversusSRI NEERAJ VERMA

Smt. Pooja filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against Sri Neeraj Verma. The applicant was represented by counsel Pramod Kumar, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party. The court noted that no appearance was made by the applicant to press the …

MOHD. YASEEN MIYA @ RAHAT ALIversusFASHEEH MOHAMMAD KHAN @ GUDDU

The petition filed by Mohd. Yaseen Miya @ Rahat Ali under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner. The court observed that there was no appearance or action taken to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

SMT. PRIYAMVADA PRAJAPATIversusKUMAR GAURAV

In Transfer Application (Civil) No. 362 of 2020, Smt. Priyamvada Prajapati filed a petition seeking transfer of the suit against Kumar Gaurav. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Saral Srivastava, but no representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Counsel …

RAVINDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusCHANDRA KISHOR JAISWAL

The revisionist, Ravindra Kumar Jaiswal, filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the revisionist to pursue the application. The opposite party, represented by counsel, was present. The Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …

SMT RAM PYARI (DECEASED) AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT PRAMOD KUMARI (DECEASED)

The petitioners, tenants, challenged the decree of eviction and rent arrears passed by the Small Causes Court, Kanpur Nagar, seeking supervisory interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High Court examined whether any material error, illegality or perversity existed in the lower …

SAIYYED WAHID ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Saiyyed Wahid Ali, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel, Tarun Pratap Singh, informed the court that due to later developments, no cause of action remained and the petitioner wished to withdraw the case. The State of U.P. and …

ABHISHEK KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Abhishek Kumar filed a review application after his writ petition was dismissed on 25 July 2025. He relied on a communication dated 2 December 2025 from the Additional Director, Medical Health and Family Welfare, which suggested that a medical certificate used by respondent No.5 was doubtful because …

M/S PARIDHI AUTO INDUSTRYversusMS U.S. INDUSTRIES

The petitioners, M/s Paridhi Auto Industry, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Meerut) to dispose of SCC Suit No. 16 of 2024 against Ms U.S. Industries within a reasonable time. The petition highlighted …

SMT NEETU DEVIversusNEERAJ

The applicant, Smt Neetu Devi, had filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 808 of 2024 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. Subsequent developments led the applicant to decide not to pursue the transfer and she moved the court to dismiss the application as …

SUKHRAM SINGHversusDR. RANJANA AND 2 OTHER

The applicant, Sukhram Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1006 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …

SMT. RAJANIversusASHISH KUMAR @ ABHISHEK

Smt. Rajani filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 3 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant failed to appear before the court and did not prosecute the application. The court observed that there was no appearance to press the application. Consequently, …

SMT. NUSHARAT JAHANversusASHRAF HUSAIN

The applicant, Smt. Nusharat Jahan, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

MONIKA SHARMAversusPRAVEEN KUMAR

Monika Sharma filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 375 of 2023 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the proceedings to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer petition. Consequently, …

SMT. SACHI CHAUDHARIversusSARVJEET SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Sachi Chaudhari, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

NASEEM KHANversusGOPAL KRISHNA GANGAL

The petition under Article 227 challenged the Small Causes Court and the revisional court's orders that decreed eviction of the petitioner, a tenant, and awarded arrears of rent to the landlord. The petitioner contended that the Uttar Pradesh Act No. 13 of 1972 should apply, arguing that the …

MOHAMMAD ZAKI KHANversusGOPAL KRISHNA GANGAL

The petition under Article 227 challenged the Small Causes Court and the revisional court's orders that decreed eviction of the petitioner-tenant and awarded arrears of rent to the respondent-landlord. The petitioner claimed that the premises fell within the ambit of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 because …

SMT.ANJALI @ GODIYAversusCHETAN SINGH @ RAHUL KUMAR

The applicant, Smt. Anjali @ Godiya, filed Transfer Application No. 459 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted. Consequently, the …

SMT. SEEMAversusRAJU SHARMA

Smt. Seema filed a civil transfer application (No. 479 of 2023) against Raju Sharma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was …

SMT. AYUSHI SRIVASTAVAversusVIKAS KUMAR

The applicant, Smt. Ayushi Srivastava, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 438 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. The counsel for the applicant were Prashant Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar Nigam and Satyawan Shahi. The opposite party, Vikas Kumar, was represented …

SMT. PALLAVI YADAVversusABHILASH YADAV

The applicant, Smt. Pallavi Yadav, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 571 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …

NEHA GARGversusRAJNEESH GIRI

Neha Garg, an assistant professor at Banaras Hindu University residing in Varanasi with her two minor children, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move her matrimonial divorce suit (Case No. 97 of 2023) from the Allahabad Family Court to the Varanasi Family Court. …

Balveer singh and 3 othersversusManju devi and Another

The applicants filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 604 of 2023 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to shift the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the respondent’s counsel, Shekhar Gangal, was present. The court noted …

GOVIND PRASAD AGARWALversusLAXMI KANT JHA

The petitioner, Govind Prasad Agarwal, filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. No further steps were taken to prosecute the application, and the petitioner failed to appear. The respondent, Laxmi Kant Jha, was represented and opposed the application. The Court observed the lack …

SMT. SHIVANIversusSURENDRA KUMAR

Shivani filed a civil transfer application (No. 677 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to shift the proceedings to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to prosecute the application, while the opposite party's counsel, Chandra Prakash Tiwari, was present. The court noted the …

SMT. KAVITA YADAV ALIAS KAVITA DEVIversusVIKASH YADAV

Smt. Kavita Yadav filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 675 of 2023 against Vikash Yadav in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The Court held that a transfer application must be prosecuted and, in the absence of any …

Dr.SHWETA GUPTAversusABHIJAT KUMAR

Dr. Shweta Gupta filed a transfer application (civil) No. 652 of 2022 against Abhijat Kumar in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Abhay Singh Tomar, Adarsh Bhushan and Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, appeared before the bench. The respondent's counsel, Sri Satvik Chaudhary, appearing on behalf …

SMT. RUCHI TIWARIversusMANISH SHUKLA

The applicant, Smt. Ruchi Tiwari, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 699 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the opposite party, Sri Avnish, was present. The Court …

RAM SOORAT SINGHversusRAM AUTAR AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Ram Soorat Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 681 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated …

IFTIKHAR MIRZAversusBASIF ALI AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Iftikhar Mirza, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order …

Smt. Neelam YadavversusHitendra Singh

The applicant, Smt. Neelam Yadav, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 726 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The application was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter. The court noted the lack of …

Sambhavi SinghversusSachin Singh

The applicant, Sambhavi Singh, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the pending civil suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The opposite party, Sachin Singh, was represented by counsel. The Court observed …

SMT. Nusharat AraversusJahangir Ahmad

Smt. Nusharat Ara filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 737 of 2023 against Jahangir Ahmad in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application, resulting in a lack of prosecution. The Court, presided by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, dismissed the transfer …

CHETNA BHARDWAJversusANOOP KUMAR

The applicant, Chetna Bhardwaj, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

VINEETA SRIVASTAVAversusASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA

Vineeta Srivastava filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Ashutosh Srivastava. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order …

KANCHAN SETHversusRAM MOHAN VERMA

The applicant, Kanchan Seth, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 921 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. …

Smt. KavyaanjaliversusDeepak Kaushik son of Sh. Rajesh Kaushik

Smt. Kavyaanjali filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 922 of 2023 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Deepak Kaushik. The applicant's counsel, Atul Kumar, was listed but no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the lack of …

GULFAMversusSMT. TAMEEJAN BEGUM AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged orders of the Small Causes Court that issued a Dakhal Parwana and directed possession to the landlord despite pending stay applications in a revision of the eviction decree. The petitioner argued that proceeding with execution would render the revision …

SAUMYA JAISWAL@ RANI KUMARIversusANAND KUMAR JAISWAL@ SATTYAM

The applicant, Saumya Jaiswal (also known as Rani Kumari), filed a transfer application (Civil No. 933 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Anand Kumar Jaiswal (also known as Sattyam). The applicant was represented by counsel Amaresh Singh, while the opposite …

Meenakshi SahaniversusAnil Kumar Sahani

Meenakshi Sahani filed a transfer application (Civil No. 935 of 2023) against Anil Kumar Sahani in the Allahabad High Court. The parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the applicant sought to withdraw the transfer application, filing a withdrawal application supported by an affidavit. The …

SMT. NEETU AGARWALversusM/S SHRI SAI DIESEL AND GENERATORS AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Neetu Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Section 21(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, seeking a direction to the Rent Authority (respondent No.3) to decide her tenancy case (Case No. 1600 of 2025) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that …

NEHA CHAUHANversusSRI ABHISHEK RAJPOOT

The applicant, Neha Chauhan, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any …

SHRADDHA SHUKLAversusADITYA KUMAR TIWARI

The applicant, Shraddha Shukla, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. After making partial submissions, the applicant's counsel, Najakat Ali, requested withdrawal of the transfer application and asked for liberty to file a fresh …

SMT.SHIPRA VERMAversusRISHABH SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Shipra Verma, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 958 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The respondent, Rishabh Singh, was represented by counsel. …

DR. Neel Kamal SharmaversusDr. Vijay lakshmi Sharma

Dr. Neel Kamal Sharma filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and there was no representation from the opposite party. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the …

SMT. ANUPAMA JAISWALversusSHRI SUMIT KUMAR JAISWAL

The applicant, Smt. Anupama Jaiswal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 980 of 2023 seeking to move the suit to another court. The respondent, Shri Sumit Kumar Jaiswal, was the opposite party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press or prosecute the transfer application. The …

SNEHA SRIVASTAVAversusDEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Sneha Srivastava filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Deepak Kumar Srivastava. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted …

SMT. SONIA SHARMAversusSUNIL KUMAR SHARMA

The applicant, Smt. Sonia Sharma, filed Transfer Application (Civil) No. 1012 of 2023 seeking to have the suit transferred to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and the opposite party, Sunil Kumar Sharma, was the only party present. The High Court …

SHWETA SHARMAversusASHISH SHARMA

Shweta Sharma filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Ashish Sharma. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer application and …

SMT. RENU YADAVversusSHAILESH YADAV

The applicant, Smt. Renu Yadav, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1016 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer application. …

AKANKSHA CHOPRAversusSAURABH CHOPRA

Akanksha Chopra filed a transfer application (Civil No. 460 of 2024) against Saurabh Chopra in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court held that an application not prosecuted cannot proceed and therefore dismissed it for want of …

POONAMversusANIL KUMAR

The applicant, Poonam, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 599 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any …

SMT. GAURAversusARUN KUMAR SAHU

The applicant, Smt. Gaura, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The respondent, Arun Kumar Sahu, was represented by counsel. The court observed that the …

RAJANI SRIWASversusRAMESH KUMAR

The applicant, Rajani Sriwas, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court examined the lack of prosecution of the application. …

SMT. PRIYANKA KUMARIversusAMIT KUMAR

Smt. Priyanka Kumari filed a transfer application before the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the pending suit to another court. The applicant was represented by counsel Raghvendra Singh, while the opposite party, Amit Kumar, was represented by Hare Krishna Tripathi. No appearance was made by …

SMT. SARITA SINGHversusSRI RAMPRAVESH SINGH

Smt. Sarita Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 731 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit against Sri Rampravesh Singh. The applicant was represented by counsel Ajeet Kumar Singh, while the opposite party was represented by Pradeep Kumar Rai and Prakhar …

SMT MOHITAversusYOGENDRA DEV

The applicant, Smt Mohita, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the opposite party's counsel, Dr. Kamlesh Kumar, was present. The court noted the absence of the applicant's …

SMT. MAMTA KUMARIversusVIRENDRA SINGH

Smt. Mamta Kumari filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 993 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Virendra Singh. The application was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The court observed that the applicant’s counsel had not complied …

SMT ANUSHKA SHARMAversusARUN KUMAR SHARMA

Smt. Anushka Sharma filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court before the Allahabad High Court. The application was to be considered by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava. The Court observed that the applicant's counsel had not taken the requisite procedural steps …

PRAGATIversusROHIT KUMAR

The applicant, Pragati, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the proceedings to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer petition. Consequently, the transfer …

PragyaversusGaurav Prakash

Pragya filed a transfer application (Civil No. 31 of 2024) seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and dismissed it for want of prosecution. As a …

Smt Abhilasha TiwariversusHimanshu Dwivedi

The applicant, Smt Abhilasha Tiwari, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the civil suit to another jurisdiction. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court found that the application was not prosecuted. The …

SMT. ARUSHI SINGHAL @ ARUSHI GOELversusNIKUNJ SINGHAL

Smt. Arushi Singhal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 58 of 2024 against Nikunj Singhal in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Jawahir Yadav, did not appear before the court to press the application. Consequently, the court noted a want of prosecution and dismissed the transfer …

PRINCY GUPTA D/O LATE RAMSAMAY GUPTAversusVIRENDRA KUMAR S/O ISHWARI SHAH

Princy Gupta filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 89 of 2024 against Virendra Kumar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted …

SWATI SAHANIversusLAXMAN SAHANI S/O SHRI HARI SHANKAR SHAHANI

Swati Sahani filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 155 of 2024 seeking to have the pending suit transferred to another court. The application was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. The High Court observed that the applicant's counsel had not complied with the procedural …

SMT SAUMYA JHAversusAWNEESH

The applicant, Smt Saumya Jha, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 236 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer …

AKSHAY KUMARversusMANOJ KUMAR SHARMA

In Transfer Application (Civil) No. 239 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court, Akshay Kumar filed an application seeking transfer of the suit against Manoj Kumar Sharma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the opposite party was represented by Ms. Pooja …

Dr. Ruby SinghversusDr. Shiv Pratap Singh

The case involved a transfer application filed by Dr. Ruby Singh against Dr. Shiv Pratap Singh. The applicant’s counsel, Anil Kumar Pandey, did not appear before the court to press the application. The opposite party’s counsel, including Ashok Kumar Mishra, Dharmendra Kumar Mishra, Manoj Kumar and …

SMT HIMANSHIversusROHIT BADLI

Smt. Himanshi filed a transfer application (Civil No. 288 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on her behalf to prosecute the application. The Court observed that the application was not pursued and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. …

KRITIKA AGARWALversusARPIT AGARWAL

In a civil transfer application (No. 38 of 2025) filed by Kritika Agarwal against Arpit Agarwal, the applicant failed to appear or present counsel before the court. The High Court noted that no one had appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the transfer request. Consequently, the court …

SMT. MEGHAversusAKSHAY KUMAR

Smt. Megha filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 40 of 2025 seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted …

SMT. SAKSHI JAINversusABHISHEK JAIN

Smt. Sakshi Jain filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 43 of 2025 against Abhishek Jain in the Allahabad High Court. The application was filed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court. Counsel for the applicant, Avinash Pandey, was observed to have not taken the requisite procedural …

SMT VANDANA @ BANDANAversusSHIVAM YADAV

The applicant, Smt Vandana @ Bandana, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order that …

SMT. RUBY MISHRAversusSRI SARVESH DUBEY

The applicant, Smt. Ruby Mishra, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Sri Sarvesh Dubey. The opposite party argued that subsequent developments had extinguished any cause of action. The court examined whether a viable cause of action remained and whether the petition had …

SMT. JYOTI SINGH @ JYOTI SINGHversusAMIT KUMAR SINGH

Smt. Jyoti Singh filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Amit Kumar Singh. No counsel or party appeared to argue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. …

SMT. DEEPA MODANWALversusMAHENDRA MODANWAL

Smt. Deepa Modanwal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 194 of 2022 seeking to transfer the suit against Mahendra Modanwal. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. Consequently, the Hon'ble Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

SMT. KHUSHBU DUBEYversusSHRI ARPIT RAWAT

The applicant, Smt. Khushbu Dubey, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. …

YASHPAL SINGHversusMALIKHAN SINGH

The applicant, Yashpal Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 106 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to shift the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court observed that the application was not being …

SMT. MINAKSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Minakshi filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 235 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The applicant's counsel was listed as Chandra Bhushan Prasad and Manoj Kumar Dhuriya, while the State of U.P. was represented by Anurag Sharma and C.S.C. …

SMT. NEETU PRAJAPATIversusLAVKUSH PRAJAPATI

The applicant, Neetu Prajapati, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move her divorce petition (filed under Section 13(1)(1Ka)(1Kha) of the Hindu Marriage Act) from the Family Court in Deoria to the Family Court in Varanasi. Both parties expressed a desire for an …

SMT. PRIYA AGARWALversusDEEPAK GOYAL

The applicant, Smt. Priya Agarwal, filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Court Rules seeking to transfer the suit against Deepak Goyal. The court observed that the applicant's counsel had not complied with the requisite procedural steps required for such an application. …

SMT. MAMTA NEHRAversusVEDVIR SINGH

Smt. Mamta Nehra filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 382 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. The earlier …

SMT. ASHA RANIversusSUBHASH CHAND

The applicant, Smt. Asha Rani, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 140 of 2025 seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. The respondent, Subhash Chand, was represented by counsel Akhtar Ali. The High Court …

SURESH SHAH SISODIYAversusJAI PRAKASH YADAV

The plaintiff, Suresh Shah Sisodiya, who became landlord of a tenanted premises in 2008, filed an eviction suit in the Small Cause Court alleging rent arrears and seeking possession. The defendant tenant denied the landlord's title, presenting a competing chain of title. The trial court found a …

SMT. REENAversusGAURAV SHARMA

The applicant, Smt. Reena, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 162 of 2025 seeking to move the pending suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. The respondent, Gaurav Sharma, was represented by counsel. The court examined whether the …

REEMA VERMAversusDR. ARVIND KUMAR CHAUDHARY

The applicant, Reema Verma, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The opposite party, Dr. Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, was represented by counsel. The court noted the lack of …

ARPITA SINGHversusRAM SUCHIT SINGH

The applicant, Arpita Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 185 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any …

RAMESHversusJAIKARAN AND6 OTHERS

The applicant filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No further steps were taken by the applicant to pursue the application. The court observed that there was no appearance by the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the transfer application was …

SMT.RUCHIversusASHISH MAHESHWARI

The applicant, Smt. Ruchi, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 574 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. …

RICHA SAHAIversusHIMANSHU SHRIVASTAVA

The applicant, Richa Sahai, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 243 of 2025 seeking to move the proceedings to another court. The respondent, Himanshu Shrivastava, was served with the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue or prosecute the transfer request. The …

AMAR SINGHversusOMPAL

Amar Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 258 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to have the suit transferred. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for …

DEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMAversusMAHARAJ SUKHPAL VASUDEV SHARMA AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Devendra Kumar Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the case, subsequent developments occurred that, in the petitioner's view, eliminated any surviving cause of action. The petitioner, through counsel J.P. Pandey, requested that the …

MOHD. ISHAQUEversusWAQF MASJID KATRA ABDUL GANI NO. 66 FATEHPUR

Mohd. Ishaque filed a writ petition against Waqf Masjid Katra Abdul Gani No. 66, Fatehpur. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The interim order previously granted was vacated. The dismissal was …

SOHANI SINGHversusSRI GOPAL KRISHNA GUPTA

The applicant, Sohani Singh, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking to move a matrimonial suit (Case No. 379 of 2019) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Family Court in Moradabad to the Family Court in Kanpur Nagar. She alleged that she was forced out …

Alka @ Nishtha JaiswalversusSagar Jaiswal

Alka @ Nishtha Jaiswal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 745 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The applicant's counsel, Manoj Kumar Dwivedi and Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, did not appear to press the application. The opposite party, Sagar Jaiswal, was …

MOHAMMAD NAFISversusSMT. MANOO DEVI

The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur to dispose of a pending rent case (No. 01 of 2012) within a stipulated period. The petitioner highlighted that the case, instituted on 10 January …

MOHAMMAD NAFISversusSMT KAMALA DEVI DIED AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur Nagar to decide a pending rent case (Rent Case No. 09 of 2012) within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged undue hardship due to repeated adjournments since the …

DR. SHWETA GUPTAversusDR. ABHIJAT KUMAR

Dr. Shweta Gupta filed Transfer Application No. 802 of 2022 seeking transfer of a suit. The applicant later informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the cause of action no longer existed and she did not wish to pursue the matter. The opposite party, Dr. Abhijat Kumar, expressed no …

DR AJAY GOVILversusMOHAMMAD IRSHAD AND 2 OTHERS

Dr. Ajay Govil, a landlord, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Rent Authority/Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Bulandshahr, to decide his tenancy case (Case No. D202311170001279) under Section 21(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Premises Tenancy Act, …

SMT. KANIKA GUPTAversusBAL KRISHNA GUPTA

The applicant, Smt. Kanika Gupta, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. …

SMT. SULEKHA @ SUREKHAversusRAKESH KUMAR CHATURVEDI

The petitioner, Smt. Sulekha @ Surekha, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 846 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the application, while counsel for the opposite party, Mr. Chandra Prakash Kushwaha, was present. The court noted the …

SMT. ANKITA AGARWALversusPRIYANK SINGHAL

The applicant, Smt. Ankita Agarwal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 350 of 2025 against Priyank Singhal. No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the application before the High Court. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim …

SMT. DIKSHA CHAUHANversusVIKAL KUMAR

Smt. Diksha Chauhan filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 894 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The …

DINESH KUMAR SARSWATversusSURENDRA KUMAR

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Sarswat, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Hathras, to dispose of Revision No. 73 of 2024 (Dinesh Saraswat vs. Surendra Kumar) within a reasonable time. The revision was filed on …

SMT. ASHUversusTANU CHAUDHARY

The applicant, Smt. Ashu, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 950 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Tanu Chaudhary. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and …

Subash @ Suvash AND ANOTHERversusSmt Seema Pathak and 10 others

The applicants, Subash @ Suvash and another, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit against Smt. Seema Pathak and ten others. The application was to be pressed by counsel Akhilendra Singh, Prabhat Kumar Singh and Shyam Singh. No counsel …