Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Y K SRIVASTAVA

262 judgments · newest first · showing 201–262

Smt Priyanka JainversusIshan Jain And 4 Others

Smt Priyanka Jain filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 408 of 2024 against Ishan Jain and four others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer request, while counsel for the opposite parties was present. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution of the …

Smt. PRATIBHA JAISWALversusSANTOSH JAISWAL

The applicant, Smt. Pratibha Jaiswal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1020 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Santosh Jaiswal. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer …

SMT. SHALINI SHARMAversusMAYANK SHARMA

Smt. Shalini Sharma filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 1046 of 2023 against Mayank Sharma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously …

SMT. SWAPNIL ASHOK KUMARversusGAURAV KUMAR

Smt. Swapnil Ashok Kumar filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Gaurav Kumar. The applicant's counsel, Digvijay Singh and Sudhir Kumar Singh, did not appear to pursue the application. The court noted the absence of any party to press the transfer request and dismissed the …

SMT. RAKHI MATHURversusSUMIT KUMAR SAXENA

Smt. Rakhi Mathur filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 485 of 2025 seeking to transfer the suit against Sumit Kumar Saxena. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The High Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and consequently dismissed it for …

SONAMversusARUNESH MURARI

The applicant, Sonam, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit against Arunesh Murari. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. The court examined whether the application could proceed in the absence of …

SAMARPALversusPARMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Samarpal, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 741 of 2024 seeking to move the pending suit to another court. The respondent, Parmar Singh and another, were served with notice of the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the transfer application. …

SMT. BHARTI @ RADHAversusAMIT KUMAR

Smt. Bharti (also known as Radha) filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 746 of 2025 against Amit Kumar in the Allahabad High Court. The application sought to transfer the suit to another court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer. Consequently, the court …

AASTHA SHUKLAversusAKSHAY BHARADWAJ

Aastha Shukla filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 831 of 2024 against Akshay Bharadwaj. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it …

SMT. RASHMI DUBEY @ SHIV RIDDHIversusPRASHANT AGNIHOTRI @ SHIV

The applicant, Smt. Rashmi Dubey, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Allahabad seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The earlier interim …

Smt LateshversusVinod Kumar AND 7 OTHERS

Smt Latesh filed a transfer application (Civil No. 919 of 2024) in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit against Vinod Kumar and others to another court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue or prosecute the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution …

RASHMIversusRANJEET KUMAR

Rashmi filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move her suit against Ranjeet Kumar to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim …

SMT NEELAMversusVISHAL BHARTI

The applicant, Smt Neelam, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 42 of 2024) seeking to move the suit to another court. The opposite party, Vishal Bharti, was served with notice of the application. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer request. The High Court …

SMT ANAMIKA SINGHversusSH. ANURAG VYAS

In a civil transfer application (No. 59 of 2024) filed by Smt. Anamika Singh against Sh. Anurag Vyas, the applicant's counsel, Shailesh Kumar Mishra, failed to appear before the court to pursue the application. The High Court noted the absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant and …

KUSUM VISHWAKARMAversusUmashankar Vishwakarma

The applicant, Kusum Vishwakarma, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 77 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court observed that the application was not prosecuted. The …

SMT ARCHANA W/O HIMANSHU DAHIYAversusHIMANSHU DAHIYA S/O SRI UMESH KUMAR

The applicant, Smt. Archana, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 91 of 2024) seeking to move the suit to another court. The respondent, Himanshu Dahiya, was served with notice of the application. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the transfer. The High Court …

AKANKSHA SHARMAversusALOK SHARMA

Akanksha Sharma filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. No counsel appeared on her behalf to prosecute the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted …

Neetu SinghversusAlok Kumar Singh

Neetu Singh filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on her behalf to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court also vacated any interim order …

SMT PURNIMA SRIVASTAVAversusVIJENDRA LAL SRIVASTAVA

Smt Purnima Srivastava filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 135 of 2024 against Vijendra Lal Srivastava in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Jagdish Prasad Mishra, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party. No one appeared on behalf of the applicant to …

Smt Manju JaiswarversusRavindra Kumar Baudh

Smt Manju Jaiswar filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 146 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the opposite party's counsel was present. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted. Consequently, …

SMT JYOTIversusAVNISH PRATAP SINGH

The applicant, Smt Jyoti, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 189 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court found that the application was not prosecuted. The Court dismissed the transfer application …

RUBI KUMARIversusPUSHPENDRA

Rubi Kumari filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 218 of 2024 against Pushpendra in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the transfer …

POOJA SINGHversusVIKASH SINGH

The applicant, Pooja Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 250 of 2024 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit to another court. The applicant was represented by counsel Harsh Narayan Singh, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party, Vikash Singh. No one appeared on …

SMT. KAMALA DEVI DESHARWANI and OTHERSversusDAKKHI LAL JAISWAL

The petitioners, Smt. Kamala Devi Desharwani and others, filed a civil revision (No. 347 of 2009) against Dakkhi Lal Jaiswal. Three counsels were appointed for the revisionists, but only one appeared, while the other two were absent without filing any adjournment request. The respondent's counsel, …

PRABHUNATH TIWARI AND 2 OTHERSversusJADUNANDAN(SINCE DECEASED) AND 22 OTHERS

The applicants, Prabhunath Tiwari and two others, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 905 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The counsel for the applicants, Hari Narayan Singh, did not appear before the court. The opposite parties, represented by Amar Nath …

RAJEEV KUMAR KAMALversusSHREE GOPAL SHARMA

Petitioner Rajeev Kumar Kamal, a plaintiff-landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Aligarh, to dispose of SCC Case No. 37 of 2017 (Rajeev Kumar Komal vs. Shree Gopal Sharma) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the case was stuck …

SONAM SETHversusKRISHNA BABU@ KISHAN BABU

The applicant, Sonam Seth, filed a civil transfer application (No. 856 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the transfer application for want of …

URVI SINGHversusSRI YASH KAUL

The applicant, Urvi Singh, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 353 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The application was listed but no steps were taken to prosecute it. The court observed that there was no appearance or action by the applicant to press the …

SMT. VARSHA GOYALversusABHISHEK KUMAR GOYAL

Smt. Varsha Goyal filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 382 of 2025 against Abhishek Kumar Goyal in the Allahabad High Court. The application sought to transfer the suit to another court. No appearance was made by the applicant to press the application. The court observed that there was no …

SIKANDERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition filed by Sikander under Article 227 was found to have no further prosecution. The court observed that the petitioner had not taken any steps to advance the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive …

SANTOSH KUMAR AGRAWALversusSANJAY KUMAR RASTOGI

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Agrawal, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel was listed for the respondent. The court observed that the petitioner failed to press the petition and there was no prosecution of the suit. Consequently, the petition was dismissed …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the State respondents were represented. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for …

SMT. SOOFIA SULTANAversusSHRI KRISHNA AND 3 OTHER

The applicant, Smt. Soofia Sultana, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 730 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. The counsel for the applicant was Manu Saxena, while no counsel appeared for the opposite parties. No appearance was made by the applicant to press …

PAPPU SONKAR AND ANOTHERversusSMT GIRIJA DEVI AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Pappu Sonkar and another filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No …

KUMARI SANIYA KHANversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petition filed by Kumari Saniya Khan under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner, resulting in no substantive hearing. The court observed that there was no appearance to press the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was …

RAHULversusMANJU GARG

Rahul filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6736 of 2020) against Manju Garg in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and the petition was not prosecuted. The Court found no basis to proceed and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order …

LUCKNOW DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION PROPERTY TRUSTversusANIL GOEL AND 2 OTHERS

Dismiss

A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6062 of 2016) was filed by Lucknow Diocesan Trust Association Property Trust against Anil Goel and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Mishra, did not appear before the court. The respondents, represented by Madan Mohan Chaurasisa and Vinayak Mithal, were present. …

PRIYANKA GUPTAversusKRISHNA SHAH

The applicant, Priyanka Gupta, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 337 of 2025 seeking to move the suit to another court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The court …

RAM LALversusB.O.R.

The petitioner, Ram Lal, filed Writ Petition No. 147 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted that an office report dated 17‑04‑2026 confirmed that notice served on the petitioner to engage another counsel was …

SRIPATIversusRAMA SHANKER AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Sripati, filed Writ Petition No. 1907 of 1977 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the petitioner failed to press the petition further. The court examined an office report dated 17‑April‑2026 which confirmed …

HORI LAL AND OTHERSversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Hori Lal and others filed Writ Petition No. 15062 of 1983 against D.D.C. and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the court despite being served notice, as confirmed by an office report dated 17‑April‑2026 indicating sufficient service. No counsel was engaged by the petitioners. …

BHAIYA LALversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Bhaiya Lal, filed Writ Petition No. 1521 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and an office report dated 17‑04‑2026 confirmed that a notice was duly served on the petitioner to engage another counsel. Since the petitioner failed to …

SMT. PREM LATAversusBABU SONKAR AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Prem Lata filed a revision application (S.C.C. Revision No. 184 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the lower court against Babu Sonkar and four others. The revisionist's counsel, Saurabh Kumar Pandey, appeared, but the opposite party's counsel, Shashi Kant …

SMT. MANDAVI BAJPEYIversusMANISH KUMAR DEEXIT

The applicant, Smt. Mandavi Bajpeyi, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 866 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant was listed but no representative appeared to press the application on the hearing date. The opposite party, Manish Kumar Deexit, was represented by …

SMT. PRATIBHA SINGHversusPRAVEEN KUMAR

The applicant, Smt. Pratibha Singh, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The interim order previously granted, if any, …

BEENU MISHRAversusAMIT KUMAR SHUKLA

Beenu Mishra filed Transfer Application (Civil) No. 15 of 2026 seeking the transfer of a suit against Amit Kumar Shukla. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava. The court disposed of the application, making reference to an earlier order in Transfer Application (Civil) …

SANTOSHI PRAJAPTIversusSHIVSAGAR PRAJAPATI

Santoshi Prajapti filed a transfer application (Civil) No.130 of 2026 seeking to have the suit transferred to another court. The opposite party, Shivsagar Prajapati, did not file a response. The court referred to an earlier order in Transfer Application (Civil) No.1061 of 2025 (Smt. Shivani Shankar …

SMT. SHWETA SINGHversusPRAVEEN SINGH

Smt. Shweta Singh filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 138 of 2026 against Praveen Singh. The matter was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the application, directing that the order dated in Transfer Application (Civil) …

NEHA KASTURIYAversusDIPIN KASTURIYA

The applicant, Neha Kasturiya, filed a transfer application (Civil No. 229 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequent developments prompted her to seek withdrawal of that application, which was effected through Civil Miscellaneous Withdrawal Application No. 10 of 2026, supported by an …

BASHIRUDDINversusNAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MURADNAGAR GHAZIABAD THRU. EXE. ENG

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The appellant, Bashiruddin, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging the dismissal of his suit for permanent injunction against the Nagar Palika Parishad, Muradnagar. The suit concerned three plots (Nos. 427, 428, 444) that the appellant claimed to own and …

M/S MERINO INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/s Merino Industries Ltd, a decorative ply manufacturer, sought a mandamus directing the Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority (HPDA) to provide a green buffer zone between its factory and a proposed residential colony, citing specific provisions of the HPDA's 2008 Bye-laws. The petitioners argued …

DAL SINGARversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

A writ petition (Writ B No. 13925 of 1982) was filed by Dal Singar against D.D.C. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The earlier interim order, if any, was discharged. The dismissal …

CHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS

The petitioners, Chandra and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or engage counsel. The court noted that a notice dated 17 March 2026 was duly served on the petitioners to appoint new counsel. Since no representation was made, the petition could not be …

DIKSHA SINGH@ SHALUversusVISHAL SINGH

The applicant, Diksha Singh, filed a transfer application seeking to move the suit to another court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the applicant no longer wished to pursue the transfer. A separate withdrawal application (Civil …

KAILASH CHANDRAversusGRAM PANCHAYAT ZAFAR HUSSAINPUR AND ANOTHER

Dismissed on merits

The appellant, Kailash Chandra, filed a second appeal (No. 991 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court against the order of Gram Panchayat Zafar Hussainpur and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the appeal. The Court observed the absence of any prosecution and, …

TARA PRASAD MISHRA DECEASED AND 7 OTHERSversusSMT. KANTI DEVI AND 6 OTHERS

The appellants filed a second appeal (Defective No. 260 of 2015) before the Allahabad High Court. The court examined an office report dated 06-05-2026 indicating that the notice to the respondents was served by affixation. The judge held that such service of notice is sufficient. No appearance was …

KESHRI AND 6 OTHERSversusNATHU SINGH AND 6 OTHERS

In Second Appeal No. 627 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court, the appellants Keshri and six others filed an appeal against Nathu Singh and six others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants to prosecute the appeal. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, consequently, dismissed the …

RAJ KUMARversusD.D.C.AND OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner to press the petition. The court, relying on an office report dated 26-02-2026, found that notice to the petitioner to engage another counsel had been duly served. Consequently, the …

HIRA MANLversusD.D.C.

A petition was filed by Hira Manl against D.D.C. The petitioner's counsel comprised Deepak Kumar Srivastava, R.N. Singh, Ram Janam Singh, and S.N. Singh, while the respondent was represented by S.C. and S.K. Singh. No appearance was made by the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the …

RAVI PRAKASH SAHUversusRAHMAN

The petitioner, Ravi Prakash Sahu, applied for a further adjournment to prepare his case. The learned counsel, Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, requested the court to grant the adjournment. The High Court, presided over by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, entertained the request and ordered that the matter …