Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
642 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun, accused of gang rape under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 70(1) and 127(3) of the CrPC. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 were contradictory and that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
The applicant Banti filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13978 of 2026 seeking release on bail in Crime No. 401 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashfaq @ Muse, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2), 62 of the BNS Act and Sections 5M/6, 18 of the POCSO Act for allegedly sexually harassing a seven‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Ajay Yadav, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The applicant claimed false …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Rajendra, who is charged with offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Azad, who was charged with offences under Sections 64(1), 352, 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor aged about 17 …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Munawwer, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing the victim's statement that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sanjay Yadav, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the same Act and Sections 5(II) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl away and …
Shailesh Yadav applied for bail in a case (Crim. No. 227 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 64, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 127(4) of the IPC, including rape and confinement of a 31‑year‑old married woman. The applicant contended that the victim was a consenting party, that the medico‑legal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aryan Kumar, who was arrested in a case alleging rape and false promise of marriage under IPC sections 69, 115(2) and 351(3). The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting adult, the medical report did not support a rape …
Nakul was arrested in a case alleging sexual harassment and threat to throw acid at a 19‑year‑old woman, under IPC sections 74, 75(2), 79, 115(2) and 351(3). The victim’s statement indicated a consensual relationship in 2022 and she refused a medical examination, while the applicant claimed he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunny Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The applicant argued that the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNS Act were …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Kaushal, who is accused of raping a minor under Sections 65(1), 123(1), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Kshitij Rastongi, who is charged with offences under IPC sections 65(1), 64(2)(F), 64(2)(M), 357(2) and under the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Riyaz Mohammad, accused under sections 333, 69 and 79 of the B.N.S. for alleged rape and related offences. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory victim statements under sections 180 and 183, lack of video …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajjeet @ Ramji Rajbhar, who was charged with rape of a minor girl (aged 13 years 5 months) under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wali Maqsood Rabbani, who was allegedly implicated in a rape case under the POCSO Act after a seven‑day delay in filing the FIR and without being named in the victim's statement. The applicant argued false implication, lack of criminal history, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Ashraf @ Asraf Hameed in a case involving alleged rape and other offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged after a seven‑day delay, he was not named in the FIR or the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar, accused under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory victim …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep, who was arrested in a POCSO rape case involving a 16‑year‑old girl who allegedly consented and became pregnant. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a nine‑month delay, that the victim’s age was not medically …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junnur Khan, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M of the BNS Act and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory statements by the …
Lakhan Singh was arrested in a case alleging rape of a seven‑year‑old girl under Sections 333, 65(2), 62 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim and the first informant turned hostile before the trial court and refused a medico‑legal examination, leaving no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Shailendra Rajput, who was charged under IPC Section 137(2), BNS Section 64(1), and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dhananjay Singh, who is charged with offences including assault and causing death under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2) and 103(1) BNS. The incident involved the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Khadak Singh, who is charged with assault offences including sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2) and 103(1) BNS, resulting in the death of Chandrika Singh. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradyuman Dhanak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 499 of 2025 alleging gang rape of a minor under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
Uttam Basaur applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 499 of 2025) alleging gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, a delayed FIR originally lodged in Madhya Pradesh, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh @ Brajesh, who was charged under Section 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a medico‑legal report and forensic lab report that did not support …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip, who was arrested in a case under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 4(2), 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing two minor girls away. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that one …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vinod Kumar, who is charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65A of the BNS and Sections 5J(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl into a matrimonial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jahagir, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87 and 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(j)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual intercourse with a 16‑year‑old girl who later claimed pregnancy. The FIR was lodged five days …
Salman was arrested in a case under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The victim’s statements indicated she left home voluntarily and lived with the accused, and there was no medical or radiological evidence to confirm her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brajesh Kumar @ Sarvesh, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, highlighted inconsistencies …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradumn @ Shamshir Khan @ Shamshir Alam in criminal case No. 0103 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act involving a minor girl aged 13 years. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faizal @ Faizul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted contradictions in the victim’s statements, and argued that medical …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Bind, who was charged under Sections 64(2)m and 64(2)h of the B.N.S., Sections 5j(ii), 5(q) and 6 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mu Raju Farooki, who was summoned under Section 319 CrPC despite not being named in the FIR or the victim's statements. The applicant had been subject to non‑bailable …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging rape of a minor girl aged 12 years and 4 months. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Golu, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted no criminal history, and highlighted a dispute …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Vishwkarma in a criminal case under Sections 64 and 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the alleged victim, aged 17 years and six months, had left home …
Prem Kumar Vasu applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he had enticed a 17‑year‑old girl away from her home, while …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amir, accused under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC were contradictory, …
Manjit Chauhan applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 352, 351(2) of the IPC, Section 69 of the BNS Act and Section 67 of the Income Tax Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in an alleged sexual assault …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Dhimar, who was charged in Crime No. 162 of 2025 under Sections 64(1), 87, 137(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory victim statements …
Shivam Sonkar, accused of offences under IPC sections 323 and 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, had been in custody since June 15, 2024. His first bail application was rejected on February 24, 2026. He filed a second bail application arguing that only four witnesses had been examined, there was no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prince, who was charged with offences including rape under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Raj Kumar who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Shahid Raza, who was charged with offences including rape of a minor under the POCSO Act and several sections of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Raj Kumar, who was charged with offences under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87, 115(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Sisodia who was charged under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87 of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Anikesh, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shahid Khan @ Munna, who was charged in Crime No. 116 of 2026 under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87 BNS and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑8‑month‑old …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Pankaj, who was charged under Sections 69 and 115(2) of the same Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a 21‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet Gautam, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M of the same Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rakesh Patel, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 5(J) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Moni, who was charged under Sections 64(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Kumar, who was charged under Section 69 BNS for allegedly establishing a false marital promise and a consensual relationship with a 25‑year‑old woman. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvind Kumar Kashyap in Criminal Case No. 334 of 2026, which involved alleged sexual assault and outraging the modesty of a minor girl under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Javed, who is accused of offences under IPC Sections 364, 302 and 201 arising from a 2017 incident. Javed has been in judicial custody since 28 January 2018 and the trial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin @ Sonu Chillar, who was not named in the FIR but was alleged to have been present at the scene of a homicide. The applicant argued that he had no active role in …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kaushal Rav, who was arrested in Crime No. 193 of 2026 for offences including assault, attempt to commit rape, and causing grievous hurt. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mannu Pal, who is charged under Sections 64(1) and 127(2) of the same Act for an alleged rape. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
Manish Bind was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a 15‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statements under sections 180 and 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita claim a consensual relationship with the accused, and the medico‑legal report does not support a rape allegation. No radiological …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash, accused in a case involving alleged rape and other offences under the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC and the lack …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Habibullah, who was alleged to be involved in a crime under Sections 103(1), 238(b), 61(2)(a), 309(6) and 317(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, and pointed out that co‑accused of similar …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek in a case under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing lack of incriminating material, contradictions in the victim's statements, and evidence of a consensual relationship. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sugreem, accused under Section 64(1) of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a minor aged 16-17 years. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, there was no incriminating material, and he had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani Kumar in Criminal Case No. 156 of 2026, which involved charges under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act, and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing the victim’s statement that she voluntarily left home and married …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek in a criminal case (Crime No. 476 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim, a minor aged 14 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Taufiq, who was arrested in Crime No. 180 of 2025 under Sections 87 and 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the victim, now 19 years …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pankaj Gond, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 64(2)M, 352 of the B.N.S.S and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act alleging rape of a 16‑year‑old …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 70(2) of the BNSS and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out contradictions between the victim's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ashutosh Dubey, who is charged with offences including sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), 351(3), 352 of the same Act and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinay Kharwar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a girl aged about 16 years. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC indicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Samar Singh, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 209 of 2026) alleged to have occurred on 15 February 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim Ali, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 216 of 2026 involving alleged sexual relations with a 17‑year‑10‑month‑old girl, false promise of marriage, and an alleged request to convert her religion. The applicant contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepchand, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crim No. 188 of 2026) alleging rape of a minor under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5j(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajit Paswan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of the same Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya Kumar Jha, who was arrested in a case alleging an attempt to commit rape under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 62 and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the 17‑year‑old victim was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gulshan Nishad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 87 of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl away and committing sexual offences. The victim, aged 15 years 11 months, gave a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Devanand Giri, who is charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC and Section 67B of the IT Act for alleged rape, criminal intimidation and publishing a video of the incident. The FIR was lodged more than two years after the alleged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Noman Akhtar, who was arrested in connection with an alleged attempted rape (Criminal Case No. 321 of 2025). The applicant argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the IPC indicated consent, that the victim was a major, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in Crime No. 172 of 2025 for alleged rape of a girl aged 16 years 11 months under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim had …
Arun Kumar was arrested for murder under Section 302 IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act after allegedly stabbing a man who intervened in a quarrel with his father. He has been in custody since 29‑April‑2024 and the trial court has examined only four of the 26 proposed witnesses, indicating a …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shah Alam, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a minor under the POCSO Act and several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the alleged incident occurred before his …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Gupta, who is charged under several IPC sections (65(1), 89, 127(2), 123, 352, 115(2), 351(3) BNS) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim was an adult and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak, who is accused in a rape case involving a minor girl aged about 14 years. The applicant argued that the medico‑legal report did not support the allegation of …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS pending the police report. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the State argued that the bail application was no longer maintainable, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision (Ram Pukar Yadav v. State of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj Gupta @ Mohd Kayyum Saifi, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he established a physical relationship with a married woman under false pretences of a job and was accused of rape. The applicant argued that the FIR was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritesh Pal, who is charged under Sections 64(2)m, 351(3), 352 BNS of the IPC and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act for an alleged rape that was reported in an FIR two years after the incident. The applicant contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Madan Pandey, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 5j(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act alleging sexual relations with a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Zeeshan, accused of rape under IPC sections 64(1), 333 and 351(3). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, the victim's medico‑legal report did not substantiate rape, there was no alarm raised, and he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Yadav, who was arrested in a rape case under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Krishna @ Kishan Yadav, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) of the same Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramkaran, accused under Sections 137(2), 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual intercourse with a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed the relationship was consensual, that the victim had …
Vivek Pathan was arrested in Crime No. 425 of 2026 under several IPC sections and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act for allegedly forcing a Hindu woman to convert to Islam. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, he had no prior criminal …
The applicant Vikash filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a criminal case (Crime No. 198 of 2026) that alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 351(3), 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 5N/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dilshad, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 64 of the BNS and Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dinesh Saket, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) of the same Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishnu Kumar, accused of rape under a First Information Report dated 30 June 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing contradictions in the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, the absence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sanjeev, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused of alleged gang rape of a girl aged about 14‑15 years under Sections 352, 351(2), 76, 70(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishan Yadav, who was accused in a rape case involving a minor girl aged about 16 years. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR or the victim's statement …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Punit, accused in a rape case (Crime No. 506 of 2026) where the FIR alleges he stood guard while co‑accused Anshu allegedly raped the victim. The applicant argued that the victim’s …
Reema Devi was arrested under Section 105 of the B.N.S. for allegedly performing surgery on the daughter of the first informant without valid qualifications, resulting in the patient's death. The applicant contended that there was no incriminating material, no intent to cause death, and she had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Virendra, accused under Sections 64(2)m, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a 17‑year‑old girl under false promise of marriage, resulting in pregnancy and a child. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amar Bahadur, who is charged with offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Income Tax Act for an alleged rape of his aunt, a married …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Indar Kumar, who was arrested in a rape case under Section 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute, pointing to the absence of injuries, lack of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 61(2) of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim’s statement that she left home voluntarily and entered into a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aadil Faruqhi, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging sexual harassment of a minor girl under Sections 65(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 5(M)/6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tipu Sultan, who is accused under Sections 62, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(m), 6 and 18 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against two minor girls. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to …
Surjeet applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the D.P. Act, where the victim, a minor aged 17 years 11 months, alleged that the applicant had established a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faizan, accused in a case of alleged gang rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl under the POCSO Act and several sections of the CrPC. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictions between the victim’s statements under Sections 180 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Avneesh, accused under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to the victim’s statement that she left home voluntarily, conflicting age determinations …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Atish Kumar, who was arrested in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 120 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing a delayed FIR, lack of injuries on the victim’s private parts, and an earlier grievance filed by the victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 97 of 2026 under sections 3(5), 69, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The allegations involved establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage and alleged rape, but the victim’s statements …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 115 of 2026) under Section 69 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim's statement under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sachin, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory statements by the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil alias Rocky, who was arrested in Crime No. 381 of 2026 for alleged rape of a 15‑year‑7‑month‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Momeen, accused in Crime No. 115 of 2026 under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a minor by false promise of marriage, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant claimed the victim was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nabi Husain, who was arrested in Crime No. 161 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m of the BNS Act and Sections 51/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and having sexual relations with a minor. The applicant claimed he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman Ahmad, who was arrested in a case registered under IPC sections 64(1), 115(2) and 351(3). The FIR does not allege rape, but the victim’s statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 accuses the applicant of rape, although the medico‑legal …
Vishal Gupta was arrested in Crime No. 309 of 2026 under IPC sections 69, 352 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, recorded a statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicating she was a consenting party and …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for a case involving multiple IPC offences (147, 323, 342, 376, 420, 504, 506, 34, 392, 411). He claimed that a prior grant of bail was not acted upon due to a communication gap, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sikandar Ansari, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 359 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 84, 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, argued that the victim, a minor, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Praduman Pandey, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a minor aged 15 years 9 months. The applicant claimed false implication, citing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Kannaujiya, who was charged under Sections 69, 127(2), 351(2) and 352 of the same Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a woman on a false promise of …
Manish was arrested in a case of alleged rape under Sections 127(2), 65(1), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim's age was disputed: an ossification test indicated 17‑18 years, while a school certificate suggested 15 years 5 months, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Kanhaiya in a rape case (Crime No. 242 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing missed calls from the victim, contradictions in the FIR and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Azad Patel, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged false promise of marriage and alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the same …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shiva Raikwar, who was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he had been granted bail earlier but …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the accused Vikki, who is charged with offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the same Act and provisions of the POCSO Act. The victim, a minor aged 15 years and 5 …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranjeet Patel in a criminal case (Crime No. 167 of 2025) where the FIR was lodged three months after the alleged incident. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, and that the death was due to an …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazim, accused under IPC sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1) and the Arms Act in a murder case where a country‑made pistol was allegedly recovered from his possession. The applicant argued innocence, pointed to bail granted to three co‑accused, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rehan @ Azad Ansari, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act, the Income‑Tax Act and the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act for alleged rape, video‑recording and forced conversion. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sachin Yadav, who was arrested in a case alleging sexual harassment and rape under Sections 64, 76, 351(3) and 352. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit Rajbhar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑old girl. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 5j(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant, Vipin, claimed false implication, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vivek Kumar Chauhan, who was arrested in a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the same Act and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arshad Ali, who was charged with offences including rape under the POCSO Act, offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ravi, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 103(1) and 238(A) BNS). The prosecution presented evidence including an obscure video showing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sameer, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 142 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 and 302. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pawan, accused under Section 70(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(j)(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act for the alleged rape of a 15‑year‑old girl who became pregnant. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that the victim’s statement …
Satish Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) involving alleged rape and dowry‑related offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no incriminating material or medical evidence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Khurshid Alam @ Golden, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 84, 115(2), 351(2) and 352, and whose alleged offence involved alleged pressure on a woman to convert her religion. The victim’s statements under CrPC …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Paswan, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the CrPC and Sections 5J(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant argued that the victim had consented, that her age was not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mukul, accused in Crime No. 28 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had consented to live with him as a married couple and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay, accused of rape under IPC sections 70(1), 351(2) and 115(2). The applicant claimed false implication, a six‑day delay in filing the FIR, and that the victim’s statement and medico‑legal report indicated consent. The State opposed bail, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramsewan, who was arrested in Crime No.118 of 2025 under sections 70(2), 303(3), 137(2), 317(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, noting the victim’s testimony did not name him, the victim …
Yaseen Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 47 of 2026) involving alleged sexual intercourse with a 17‑year‑old girl, who is also pregnant, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Basarat @ Lalla, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly enticing the daughter of a complainant. The applicant claimed false implication, citing inconsistencies in the victim's age (FIR stated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishnu Dayal, who was arrested in connection with offences under the BNS, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act, including alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged after a 20‑day delay, and …
Malkhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 0064 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 87, 64(2)(M), 351(3) and 115(2), purportedly involving the rape of a 23‑year‑old woman. The applicant contended that the victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicated consent …
Shivam was arrested in connection with a case under several sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, the alleged victim being a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the relationship was consensual and that there was no medical evidence …
The applicant, Samsul alias Samsuddin, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 27004 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The State's assistant government advocate informed the court that a notice had been served on the first informant. The applicant's counsel subsequently sought …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 109 of 2026) but was not named in the FIR. The applicant's name first appeared in a later informant statement alleging he helped commit the offence, while the victim’s statements under Sections …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rampravesh Sahani, who was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a 15‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, and asserted that the medical report showed no injuries and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deovrat Pandey, accused under sections of the Criminal Procedure Code and the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim's statement that she left home voluntarily and was in love …
Abhimanyu Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Shri Deep Chand Singh, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a criminal appeal or a fresh application. The State, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Afsar Ali, who was arrested in Crime No. 360 of 2026 under sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor girl aged about 12 years. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman, accused in Crime No. 111 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 15‑year‑11‑month‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ramu, who was charged under Sections 74, 75, 76 and 64(1) of the same Act for an alleged rape. The applicant contended that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vikas Nishad, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 64 of the B.N.S.S. and 5J(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual intercourse with a minor. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vivek, who is charged with gang rape and related offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sumit, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old under Sections 70(1), 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted a seven‑day delay in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Karan Biyaar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual harassment of a minor girl aged 16 …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajan @ Deepak Lodhi, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old girl under the POCSO Act, as well as offences under the BNS Act, SC/ST Act and the IT Act. The applicant argued that the victim was a consenting …
Rahul was arrested in a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl. The FIR alleged he enticed the minor and faced charges under sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. Rahul contended that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhure Urf Mohammad Hasan, accused under Sections 87, 70(2), 127(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(G) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged gang rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a seven‑month delay, that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Saleem, who was arrested under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for an alleged offence involving a major divorced woman. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no incriminating material, and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sagar, accused under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim's statements, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naveen, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 74, 351(2), 65(1) of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. Naveen argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim's statements, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sachin @ Golu, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a minor girl aged about 15 years. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed on behalf of Shahrukh, who is accused of rape under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) BNS. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged three days after the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra, accused in Crime No. 141 of 2026 for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, delay in filing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishwanath Gaund, who was arrested in a case involving alleged gang rape, false promise of marriage, and administration of poison to a minor girl, charged under several sections of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Anil Kumar, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal No. 277 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 70(1), 331(4) and 351(3) of the same Act. The applicant argued …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026) under Sections 87, 69 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the victim, a major married woman, had consented and that the medico‑legal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj @ Priyanshu, accused under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statement …
Rajat was arrested in connection with Crime No. 506 of 2025, charged under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor girl aged 15‑16. The applicant contended that the victim had consented, that the medical report did not support …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajababu, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal No. 225 of 2026) under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing lack of incriminating material, an inconsistent victim statement, and …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Munshad, who is charged with rape under Sections 64(1) and 351(2) BNS. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged after a delay of one and a half years, the victim, a …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Nicky, accused under Sections 351(3), 352, 64(2)Da and 333 of the B.N.S. for alleged sexual exploitation of a married woman. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictions in the victim's statements under Sections 180 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 138 of 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out the absence of a rape allegation in the FIR and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Suhail Khan, who was arrested in a case involving alleged forced conversion of a 19‑year‑old woman and alleged offences under the Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan Nishad, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged five days after …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep (Ballu) in a case involving alleged kidnapping, abduction and rape of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the …
Vishnu was arrested in a case under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl. The victim, aged between 14 and 17 years as per conflicting documents, stated that no physical relationship existed with the accused and refused a …
Shivshankar Sahani was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he abused and maltreated his wife and three children, leading them to ingest organophosphorous poison, resulting in the death of two children. The primary informant turned hostile before trial, and the applicant has no prior …
Shiv Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 321 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 105, 115(2), 352, 85 and 351(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating his wife fell from a terrace due to a slip, and that he had no prior criminal record and had …
Ritik was arrested in connection with a stabbing that led to the death of Mukesh after a month, and is charged under several IPC sections (103, 351(2), 61(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) BNS) and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has been in custody …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradumman Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 626 of 2025 under Sections 64(2)(M) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 67 of the Income Tax Act, alleged to have committed rape. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the victim, a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajan, accused in Crime No. 342 of 2025 under Sections 64, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., alleging false implication and lack of incriminating material. The victim, a pregnant woman, had given statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vivek, who is accused in Crime No. 384 of 2025 for offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the same Act and the Arms Act for allegedly participating in an assault by …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Nihal Singh, who was arrested in a gang‑rape case involving a minor girl aged 15‑17 years under Section 70(2) of the Bail and Surrender Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of …
Vikas Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Section 65(1) of the BNSS and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication as his name does not appear in the FIR and the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS. The applicant argued that the victim, aged …
Manish Kumar was arrested in a case alleging rape of his 15‑year‑old daughter under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged six months after the alleged incident under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S., and the victim refused a medical examination. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Kumar under Section 5(J)(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication and noting that he had already been granted bail for other offences. The State opposed the bail, but the court examined the nature of the offence, the evidence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Avinash, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that …
