Created by Fuzzy Cloud

YOGESH DUBEY JOINT REGISTRAR JUDICIAL

642 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

PADAM TRIPATHI @ RUDRANSH TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Padam Tripathi @ Rudransh Tripathi was arrested in a gang‑rape case under Section 70(2) of the Bail and Surrender Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s age was disputed – 17 years per radiological examination and 15 years per school certificate – and the medico‑legal report was …

KAMLA VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kamla Verma, who was charged with offences including Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …

ANUJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anuj, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a minor under various sections of the same Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

PANKAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pankaj, who was charged with offences under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 61(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

MANVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manvendra Singh was arrested in Crime No. 90 of 2026 for alleged rape of a minor and related offences under the POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and other statutes. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report showed no injuries to the victim’s private parts, and that he …

RAJ BAHADUR @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raj Bahadur @ Guddu, who was charged under Sections 65(2), 115(2), 351(2) of the same Act and Sections 5 and 6(1) of the POCSO Act for alleged penetrative sexual assault …

SHIVA SAHARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Sahariya, accused under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report did not …

RAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj, who was arrested in Crime No. 44 of 2026 under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the alleged victim, a 13‑year‑old girl, had …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Santosh Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case involving a minor victim. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statements under Section …

AMAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a minor girl aged about 14 years. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, …

RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul Kumar, who was implicated in a rape case involving a minor aged 13 years and 10 months. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the same …

DAYASHANKAR RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dayashankar Rajbhar, who was arrested in connection with offences under sections 65(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual exploitation of a minor girl aged 15 years and 3 months. The applicant …

AAS MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad in a rape case under Sections 64(2), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5N and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim’s statement under Section 183 did not incriminate him, the …

SHIVA SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shiva Saini applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a rape case (Crime No. 307 of 2025) involving a minor victim aged between 13 and 17 years. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted that the medico‑legal report showed an intact hymen and …

SHUBHAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham Yadav, accused under sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 5J(ii) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl who was pregnant. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rahul was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 115(2), 351(3) and 352, alleged to have established a physical relationship with a married woman by falsely promising marriage, administered drugs, and caused a miscarriage. The victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 …

AKRAM BEGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ak Ram Beg, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged rape, attempt to murder, drug possession and an obscene video of the victim. The applicant claimed false implication due to business rivalry, highlighted the …

SURAJ PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj Paswan, who was arrested in a rape case (CrPC Sec. 64(1), 351(3)) and had been in custody since July 15, 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to material contradictions between the victim’s statements under …

ADESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Adesh, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30485 of 2026 seeking release on bail for an additional charge under Section 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S. in Case Crime No. 94 of 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material …

AAMIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Aamir filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, which the State's counsel did not oppose. The court allowed the withdrawal and …

TAZUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tazuddin, accused in Crime No. 501 of 2025 under Section 69 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, no incriminating material, no prior criminal record, and expressed willingness to marry the victim who was allegedly …

MOTAB ALIAS MEHTAB ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Motab alias Mehtab Ansari was arrested in Crime No. 83 of 2025 under Sections 352, 351(4) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged offences including a later‑added rape allegation. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and that the victim’s rape claim was …

SAMIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Samir was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No. 443 of 2024, alleging offences under IPC sections 376, 506, 328, 354, 509 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The FIR mentions an attempt to rape, while the victim’s statements are contradictory – one under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS …

VIPIN ALIAS AMARNATH DHARIKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin alias Amarnath Dharikar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …

SHAMSHER SINGH ALIAS LALU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shamsher Singh alias Lalu Yadav, who was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 81 of 2025) and alleged to have been falsely implicated. The applicant argued lack of eyewitness testimony, reliance on circumstantial evidence, and his clean record, …

VISHAL GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal Giri, who is charged under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly stabbing a deceased person during a quarrel. The applicant asserted that the incident was a sudden fight, that he …

AJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested in a case involving alleged robbery and gang rape under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim's age was disputed (16 years 8 months …

JITENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Jitendra Prasad, who is charged with offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 109, 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SHESHMANI PATEL ALIAS DEVRAJ PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sheshmani Patel, who was alleged to have driven a truck from which 500 kg of ganja was seized under the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that the mandatory provisions of …

BIJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bijendra, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences such as assault, grievous injury and other provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. …

LEELAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of the accused Leela, who was lodged in jail since 25‑01‑2026 for offences including sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 61(2), 109, 130, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(2), 110 BNS and …

HARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harendra, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences including assault and grievous injury to an 84‑year‑old informant. The applicant claimed …

AJEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences including assault and grievous injury. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that …

RAJU ALIAS RAJPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raju Alias Rajpal, who was arrested in connection with a violent incident involving multiple accused and injuries to an 84‑year‑old informant. The applicant claimed …

SASARAM NONIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sasaram Noniya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a cyber‑fraud case (Case Crime No. 46 of 2025) that also involves offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 61(2) of the BNS Act and Section 66D …

PAWAN JATAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Pawan Jatav, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3‑7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Section 99 of the B.N.S. The applicant …

SHIVAM CHATURJIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Shivam Chaturji, who was arrested in a dowry‑related case (Criminal Case No. 91 of 2026) involving alleged harassment and a 30% burn injury to the victim. The applicant claimed …

SHARWAN CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Sharwan Chauhan, who was arrested in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

PAWAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pawan Yadav, who was arrested in connection with Crime No.114 of 2026 involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was …

NASEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naseem Khan, who was implicated in Crime No.50 of 2021 under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Salman, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. Salman claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

BRIJBHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Brijbhan, who was lodged in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

ABHIJEET SINGH @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Abhijeet Singh, who was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and ransom case (Crime No.90 of 2026) involving the abduction of the son of a complainant and a demand of …

PRAVEEN KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Praveen Kumar Maurya, who was charged under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act for possession of 34.6 kg of poppy straw, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The …

KAMRAN SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kamran Shah, who was arrested in connection with a 2019 case involving alleged counterfeiting of clothing and related offences under the IPC, Copyright Act and Trademark …

SMT ROOBIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Smt. Roobi, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 469 of 2023) involving multiple IPC offences including rioting, assault, and attempt to murder, as well …

AMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Aman Khan, who is charged in Crime No. 88 of 2025 under Sections 3, 8, 5 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4, 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

RAJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rajeev Kumar, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 66 of 2026 involving alleged violations of Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the same Act and …

CHHOTE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Chhote and Farokh, who were accused in Crime No. 192 of 2019 for offences under Sections 429 and 269 of the same Act, as well as Sections 3, 5, 8 of the Cow Slaughter …

NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Nadeem, who was arrested in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act (Sections 3, 5, 8) and BNS (Section 3(5)). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name appeared only in …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raju, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, had …

KAMRANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Kamran, who was charged under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no police officer was …

JAMEEL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jameel Ahmad, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Crime No. 186 of 2026) for alleged possession of 514 g of charas, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant …

NAVEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naved, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 350 grams of cannabis. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

MOHD SHAMIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Mohd Shamim, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the same Act, the Arms Act and the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed …

MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Mukesh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(Kha)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

SHABNAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shabnam, who was arrested in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case (Crime No. 457 of 2025) for alleged possession of 115 g of alprazolam powder. The …

VISHAL @ TIGER GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishal Gautam and two others who were arrested in connection with a case involving alleged theft of a generator set, an attempt to fire on an informant causing a …

RAMESH PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ramesh Paswan, who was in custody for offences under Sections 109, 352, 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence and …

SALMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Salma, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

AJAY MADDHESHIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ajay Maddheshiya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 143(4) of the same Act and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging false …

HASEEN @ IDDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Haseen @ Iddu, who was arrested in an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29) for allegedly possessing 5.081 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the …

SURAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained bail application No. 37510 of 2025 filed by Suraj Kumar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under Sections 123, 309(4), 61(2) of the same Act and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The …

JITAN ALIAS JEETANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jitan alias Jeetan, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 352 BNS of the same Act and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting Ritik Gupta with a sharp‑edged …

AKRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akram, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 3 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Akram had been in …

PRASHANT BAGHGELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Baghel, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

AWADHESH LODHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Awadhesh Lodhi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 160 g of Alprazolam. The applicant contended that the …

JAVEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Javed, who was charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 135 grams of charas, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant argued …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vinod Kumar, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving alleged recovery of 25 kg of ganja from a car in which he was found. The applicant contended that he was …

SURENDRA YADAV ALIAS SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Surendra Yadav, who is charged under Sections 8, 20, 27A, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant’s name appeared only in the confessional statement of co‑accused Meera …

PINKIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pinki, who was implicated in a NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29) for alleged involvement in the recovery of 1.250 kg of ganja from a co‑accused's possession. The applicant …

RAVISHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ravishankar who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

ANISH AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anish Ahmad, who was implicated in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2025) involving sections 308(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2) of the same Act and sections 66 and 66D of …

AKHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

Akhil, accused of assault by firearm and related offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The injured party suffered a simple jaw injury, and the applicant has no prior criminal record, having been in …

PRASHANT CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Chauhan, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2024) involving alleged siphoning of Rs 57,89,776. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

PUSPENDRA ALIAS ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Puspendra alias Arun Kumar, who was charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) of the same Act and Sections 5(M)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged penetrative sexual assault on a …

NAVI ULLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Navi Ulla who was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false …

RAJNEESH DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rajneesh Dwivedi, who was arrested in a NDPS case for allegedly transporting 69.51 kg of ganja. The applicant argued that the seizure did not comply with mandatory …

VIKAS KHARWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vikas Kharwar, who had been in custody for eight years pending trial in a case registered under IPC Sections 302 and 120‑B. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged …

SHIV PRASAD MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shiv Prasad Mishra applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case where 364.4 kg of ganja was seized from a truck and he was found sitting beside the driver, though no contraband was recovered from his conscious possession. The prosecution argued the …

SHIVAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivam Yadav, who was charged with offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 333, 110 and 105 of the same Act for the alleged murder of Saraswati Devi. The …

BYAS MUNI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Byas Muni Yadav, who is accused in Crime No.555 of 2024 for offences including assault causing grievous injury and death of Saraswati Devi. The applicant claimed …

BHEEMA RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bheema Ram, who was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged possession of 4,032 bottles of illegal foreign liquor and charged under several …

SHIVA TIVARI @ PARTH TIVARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shiva Tivari, who was arrested in a narcotics case involving 56.268 kg of ganja seized from a vehicle. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the mandatory …

BABHUTA RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Babhuta Ram, who was alleged to be the driver of a truck from which 6,085.44 litres of illicit English liquor was seized. The charges included offences under Sections …

AKARAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akaram, who is charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 1.2 kg of charas. The applicant …

RAJ SHANTILAL PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raj Shantilal Patel, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.06 of 2024) involving IPC offences (384, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66‑C, …

SHYAM SHIVHAREversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shyam Shivhare, who is accused in an NDPS case for alleged possession of 81 kg of ganja recovered from a car. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

JITENDRA SAKET @ JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jitendra Saket, who is accused in an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29) for alleged possession of 100 kg of ganja recovered from two vehicles. The applicant asserted …

PRAMOD KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Pramod Kumar Yadav, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 143(3) of the same Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. The …

SONPAL @ SONAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sonpal @ Sona, who is accused in Crime No. 172 of 2012 of offences under IPC Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant …

SACHIN @ KANJA @ SUMIT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sachin @ Kanja @ Sumit Sharma, who is accused under Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered in 2021. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false …

BAFADARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Bafadar who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, …

RAMESH SHAHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ramesh Shah, who was arrested in a narcotics case involving 20.8 kg of ganja recovered from a vehicle he was traveling in. The applicant contended that he …

FIROZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Firoz, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act for allegedly transporting three cows in a bolero …

MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mukesh, who was arrested in a case involving multiple serious offences under the same Act and the Aadhar Card Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

ROSHAN GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Roshan Gupta, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8, 21 and 23 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 50 bottles each of Diazepam, Buprenorphine and …

CHAND BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Chand Babu, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 307, 399, 402, 411, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed …

JAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jay Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for allegedly possessing 10 kg of ganja recovered from a …

AMIT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Amit Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act and had been in custody since 7 December …

VISHAL SINGH SISODIYA @ ASHISH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishal Singh Sisodiya, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

SHIVA SISODIYA @ SHIVA RANA @ HARSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shiva Sisodiya, who was arrested in a case under Section 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

HAMDADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Hamdan, who was arrested in connection with a theft case (Crime No.07 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 305, 331(4), 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections …

BINTU KASHYAP @ TUINYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bintu Kashyap @ Tuinya, who was arrested in a case involving offences under IPC Section 333, BNS Section 74 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …

MOBEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mobeen, who is accused in an NDPS case (Sections 8/29) for possession of 20 grams of cannabis, a quantity below commercial threshold. The applicant claimed innocence, …

MUSTAHID ALIAS BHURAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mustahid alias Bhura, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 21 grams …

NAUSHAD ALIAS TOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naushad alias Tola, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

SHAILENDRA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shailendra Katiyar, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

GULSHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Gulshan, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …

VANSH GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vansh Goswami, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

MONU KASHYAPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Moni Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 305‑A, 331(4), 317(2), 3(5) of the same Act and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed …

SONU KASHYAPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sonu Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged theft of articles, a sharp‑edged weapon and a screwdriver, and charged under Sections 305A, …

SARFRAZ AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Sarfraz Ahmad and Shadab Ahmad who were charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicants claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that they were …

AMAN CHAUDHARI @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aman Chaudhari, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29, 60) for alleged possession of 490.745 kg of ganja recovered from a co-accused's tractor. The …

ANKUR TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankur Tyagi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued …

MUKESH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mukesh Nishad, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

NIRANJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Niranjan Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

NAJAKATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Najakat, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act for the alleged recovery of 30 cows. The applicant argued that he was not named …

AMIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Amir, who was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act in a case registered in 2025. Amir claimed innocence, stating that no narcotics were recovered from his …

AADESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aadesh Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

PAWAN KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Pawan Kumar Yadav, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving Sections 3(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act. The FIR alleged …

RACHANAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rachana, who had been in custody since 15 April 2026 for alleged participation in a stone‑throwing incident that injured two police officers. The FIR named 36 …

MOHAMMAD SHAMSHER @ SHAMSEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohammad Shamsher, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, argued that he had been in custody since March 6, 2026, and …

SURAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Suraj Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence and …

HIMANSHU @ PIYUSH @ BHANJA @ KATTAR BANIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an accused in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

ABDUL RAHMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abdul Rahman, who was arrested in connection with offences under multiple sections of the same Act and the Copyright Act. The applicant contended that he …

ALAUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alauddin, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 103 of 2026 involving alleged theft of articles, a sharp‑edged weapon and a screwdriver, and charges under …

ABHINAV ALIAS MONU CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abhinav alias Monu Chaurasia, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

MOHD ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Arif, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 1.023 kg of opium, a quantity below the commercial …

HARSHIT VARSHNEY HINDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harshit Varshney, who was in custody since March 13, 2026 for offences including sections 191(2), 191(3), 125, 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS, the …

MOHD. ASAD ALIAS ASAADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd. Asad, who was in custody for alleged offences under multiple IPC sections and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted the long …

HARSHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Harshit, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 259 of 2025 under Sections 7 and 13 of the U.P. Public Examination Act. The applicant claimed he was …

ANIL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Singh, who was arrested in a NDPS case for allegedly possessing 40 g of Alprazolam. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the mandatory …

NITIN YADAV @ KALUWAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Nitin Yadav, who is charged under IPC Sections 307 and 504 and the Arms Act (Sections 4 and 25). The applicant had been in custody for four years and his earlier bail plea …

PRAMOD GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pramod Goswami, who is accused under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 191.6 kg of ganja recovered from a truck where he was seated …

SRAWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of an accused charged with offences under IPC Sections 376(3), 504, 506 and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of an 11‑year‑old deaf‑and‑dumb girl. The …

AFZALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Afzal, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8 and 20) for alleged possession of 1.5 kg of charas. The applicant contended that the seizure violated Section 50 of …

DR ANITA RATHAURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dr. Anita Rathaur, who was charged with multiple offences including fraud, forgery, and medical negligence under various IPC sections and the Indian Medical Council Act. …

AKHIL PAL ALIAS ATUL ALIAS SIKANDARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akhil Pal, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing a charge under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed false implication, highlighted that he was …

DR KAMRANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dr. Kamran, who is charged under several provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act for operating an unregistered physiotherapy centre. The FIR alleges the violation …

SAIF ALI @ ASLAM @ SHAUKIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Saif Ali, who is charged with offences under Sections 394, 506, 411, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/25(1B) of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he …

VIJAY KUMAR GAUTAM @ KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijay Kumar Gautam, who was charged under Sections 3, 5-A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Section 109(1) of the same Sanhita, and Sections 3 …

IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Irfan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

ISHAM @ HISHAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Isham @ Hisham, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

SAIKAL @ HAMIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Saikal @ Hamid, who is charged under IPC sections 307, 353, 332, 429 and sections of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no …

MUNNBARversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Munnbar, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 49 of 2026) alleging penetrative sexual assault under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3/4(2) of the …

ANIL PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Prajapati, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted his …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) …

DHARMENDRA PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dharmendra Pal, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Section 8/18) for possession of 629 grams of opium. The applicant argued that the quantity was below …

IMRAN URF KALAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Imran Urf Kala, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that …

SANTOSH @ ISHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santosh @ Isha, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged violations of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and provisions of the BNS. The applicant claimed innocence and …

SHAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shakir, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 5A/8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGH @ VIKKI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akhand Pratap Singh, who was charged with offences under multiple sections of the same Act and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed …

MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Manoj, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

DEENA @ DEENANATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Deena @ Deenanath, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

RAHUL KORI @ MUSA @ RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rahul Kori, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act where 36 kg of ganja was allegedly recovered from a vehicle he was travelling in. He contended that the mandatory provisions of …

ROHIT @ FUTTA KANJHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rohit @ Futta Kanjhan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) …

TASLEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tasleem, was arrested in Crime No. 49 of 2026 under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act and has been in custody since 27 March 2026, claiming he was falsely implicated. He contended that he is already on bail in a …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sameer, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with a sharp‑edged weapon. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no …

AJEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet, who is accused in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he is …

SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sushma, who is accused in a 2021 case involving offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 506, 34 and the Banning Act sections 3‑6. The applicant claimed …

ROHIT @ KEERAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rohit @ Keera, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 173 of 2025 for alleged violations of Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 35 and 27 of the Arms …

RITIK TYAGI @ GOLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a charge under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 5, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. The applicant, Ritik Tyagi, claimed innocence, stating that no police …

AMIT YADAV @ BUGGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Yadav under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted his innocence, …

MD WASIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Md. Wasi, who was arrested in connection with a fraud case involving alleged impersonation and fraudulent sale deeds under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the BNS and …

GANDHI CHUAHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Gandhi Chauhan, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

ANKIT RANAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankit Rana, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

PRAVEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Praveen who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Raja Quraishi who was charged under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8), the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) and Section 429 of the IPC. The applicant argued that no …

KHUSI MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Khusi Mohammad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raja Quraishi, who was charged under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8), the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) and Section 429 of the IPC for allegedly …

NAMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Namit, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that no arms were …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Anil, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he had …

AKRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ak Ram, who was arrested in a case under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 5A/8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed …

WAKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Wakar, who is accused in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

KARANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Karan filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case involving offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that Karan and two co‑accused assaulted the son …

WAQEELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Waqeel, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 10.3 kg of ganja. The applicant’s name appeared in the confessional …

AVINASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Avinash, who was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No.34 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 318(2), 319(2), 3(5), 338, 308(6) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66‑C …

SONU @ AJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sonu @ Ajay Kumar, who was charged under Sections 115(2) and 137(2) of the same Act and Sections 5K/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for alleged …

GAUTAM GIHARversusSTATE OF U..P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Gautam Gihar, who was charged under Sections 310(4) and 317(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for alleged preparation of dacoity. The …

ARUN KUMAR GAUTAM @ ARUN MAHADEVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arun Kumar Gautam, who alleged false implication in a case involving multiple accused. The applicant was not named in the FIR but his name appeared in a co-accused's …

BILTUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Biltu, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging forgery of Aadhaar cards and related offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 335, 337, 338 of the same Act, as …

MANGAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mangal Yadav, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that he …

TAUSIF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tausif Khan, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had been in …

BADALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Badan, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 1.034 kg of charas. The applicant contended that the recovery was …

YOGESH KUMAR GUPTA @ BHOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yogesh Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

MOHD TALIBversusSTATE OF U.P THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(HOME) U.P., LUCKNOW

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Talib, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing pistols and live cartridges. The applicant …

RIYAJUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Riyajuddin who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

HONEY SHIVAJIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Honey Shivaji, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 230 of 2026 involving multiple offences under the BNS and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The …

JAIMATI KUMARI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jaimati Kumari Devi, who was charged under Sections 8, 18 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 1.645 kg of opium, a quantity below the commercial threshold. …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shahruku, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged discharge of a country‑made pistol and injury to a police officer. The applicant claimed innocence …

SOMVATI ALIAS SOMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Somvati Alias Soma, who was arrested in a narcotics case (Crime No. 159 of 2026) for allegedly possessing 1.276 kg of charas, a quantity exceeding the …

DEEPU GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepu Goswami, who was arrested in connection with the recovery of 196.680 kg of ganja from a truck in Agra. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and …

IRSHAD ALIAS MULLIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Irshad alias Mulli, who was charged in Crime No. 130 of 2025 with offences including assault with a sharp‑edged weapon, among others. The applicant argued that although …

YADRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who is accused of embezzling Rs.2,28,000 by transferring customers' bank funds to his own account. The charges include IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and …

MONU SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Monu Sharma, who was implicated in an NDPS case (Criminal No. 173 of 2025) for allegedly being found in a truck from which 196.68 kg of ganja was seized. The applicant …

AVANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Avanish, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Case Crime No. 20 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 61(2) of the BNS and …