Created by Fuzzy Cloud

YOGESH DUBEY JOINT REGISTRAR JUDICIAL

642 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600

RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ravi Kumar who was arrested in an NDPS case (Sections 8/20) for alleged possession of 1.498 kg of charas. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and argued …

ANKITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Ankit who faces charges under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 316(2) of the same Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SABIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sabir, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted that …

AKASH KOSTHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Kostha who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

MOHD SAIF @ MOHD ANJAAN @ BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Saif, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

SOHAN PRASAD RAVANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sohan Prasad Ravani, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

PRAMOD BAIGAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pramod Baiga, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he …

SHAUKAT KURANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shaukat Kuran, who was arrested in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that co‑accused had already been released on bail, no beef or other material was seized …

SHIVAM @ PRAVEEN MODANWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shivam @ Praveen Modanwal, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that he had been falsely …

PARVEJ AALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the petitioner Parvej Aalam who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act (GAAPA). The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that …

KAPILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kapil, who had been in custody since October 2020 for alleged murder under IPC Sections 302 and 34. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had been …

RAMA ALIAS RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rama alias Rahul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SAURABH @ KARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Saurabh @ Kariya who was charged under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that he was …

SAURABHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Saurabh, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8/20) for allegedly possessing 7.41 g of smack. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the quantity was below …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rakesh Kumar, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued …

HASIM @ RAJA BABUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Hasim @ Raja Babu, who was arrested in a case of alleged sexual assault on a four‑year‑old girl under Sections 9M and 10 of the Protection of Children from …

VIVEK SHRIVASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vivek Shrivas, who was charged under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the same Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act for alleged receipt and …

HASNAIN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Hasnain Khan was arrested on 13 January 2026 and charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 500 grams of a narcotic. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence and arguing that the mandatory …

PAPPU @ MAHENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pappu @ Mahendra, who was arrested in a NDPS case (sections 8/20) for alleged possession of 29.760 kg of ganja. The applicant contended that the seizure and …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankit Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sushma, who is accused in a case involving IPC offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and conspiracy, as well as offences under the Prize Cheats and …

SATENDRA @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Satendra @ Pappu was arrested for alleged possession of 21.10 kg of ganja, a country‑made pistol and cartridges, and charged under Sections 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.), Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act and Sections 8, 20 of the NDPS Act. He filed a bail application …

GOPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Gopal, who is charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 29.760 kg of ganja. The applicant …

RAIS AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rais Ahmad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act for allegedly possessing 65 kg of cow meat. The applicant …

INTZAR @ MOTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Intzar @ Mota, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

YASH GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yash Goyal, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple accused under various sections of the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the BNS. The applicant …

AMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. Amit claimed he was falsely implicated and …

SHAVEJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shavej, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

RAMBABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rambabu, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 113 of 2025) involving IPC offences (420, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66C, 66D). The applicant …

MONISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Monish, who was arrested in an NDNDPS case (Sections 8, 21 and 29) for allegedly possessing 50 g of ‘smack’, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant …

ABIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of the accused Abid, who was charged under Sections 3(5) of the same Act and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

RANI KINNARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rani Kinnar, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

SHADABversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Shadab in a case involving alleged violations of Sections 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 5, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

MOHAMMAD HANIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohammad Hanif, who is charged under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Dharmendra, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was already …

MOTILALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Motilal, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

DEEPAK HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak Harijan, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was …

LALLAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Lallan Kumar, who was arrested in a complaint case involving IPC sections 323, 498-A, 377, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Shekhar, who is accused under Section 109(1) of the same Act and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that no police officer was injured …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rashid, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 22 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 130 g of Alprazolam powder. The applicant argued that the seizure …

AYUSH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ayush Sharma, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 230 of 2026 involving multiple offences under the BNS and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant …

SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sahil, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving 3.2 kg of opium and 156 g of smack. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, …

SAMSHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Samshul, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 3 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act concerning the alleged disposal of cow carcasses. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and during investigation the …

RABBANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rabban, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 22 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 270 g of Smack. The applicant contended that the prosecution had …

PINKOO @ CHUNNU KANJADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pinkoo @ Chunnu Kanjad who was arrested in an NDNDPS case (Section 8/20) for allegedly possessing eight kilograms of ganja, a quantity below the commercial …

SUMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Sumit, who was arrested for possession of 861 grams of opium under Sections 8, 18 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that co‑accused had already been granted …

RANJEET YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ranjeet Yadav, who was implicated in an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29, 60) for allegedly having 24.4 kg of ganja in the dickey of a vehicle he was driving. The applicant …

ARYANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an accused in an NDPS case involving 1.70 kg and 1.60 kg of ganja recovered from the accused and a further 94.8 kg recovered from an abandoned factory. The applicant argued that …

AVADHESH GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Avadhesh Giri, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an NDNDPS case where 8.65 g of MDMA was seized from his possession. The defence argued that the quantity was below the commercial threshold and that the recovery violated Section 50 of the …

ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arjun Singh, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had been in …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 308, 452, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR …

PRABHATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prabhat, who is accused under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for the alleged recovery of 63.3 kg of ganja from a truck. The applicant argued that the mandatory …

SONAM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sonam Devi, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8/20) involving 32.1 kg of ganja. The applicant argued that the mandatory sampling provisions of Section 52‑A of the NDPS …

ABID ALIAS GABBARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Abid alias Gabbar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

SHIVBABU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivbabu Yadav, who is charged with murder of his wife under Section 103(1) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, pointing to discrepancies between the inquest report …

SHYAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Shyam, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that …

SHOAIB @ CHAOBAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shoaib @ Chaoba, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Jitendra in a case involving offences under Section 143(3) of the same Act and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

AASIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aasif, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SURAJ GIRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of two police personnel accused under Sections 8, 20(b), 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for alleged possession of 21.1 kg of ganja. The …

NADEEM KURAISHI @ BABLIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nadeem Kuraishi, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely …

NASIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Nasir in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal record, and that no material was …

ASLAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aslam, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged …

NAZIM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nazim Ansari, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.57 of 2024) involving alleged receipt of Rs.20,00,000 and charges under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section …

BABLOO KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Babloo Kumar, who was arrested on 28‑April‑2025 in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 11 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, …

SOHANVIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the accused Sohanvir, who was also charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

SABIR @ KALIAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sabir @ Kalia, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Section 8/20) for allegedly possessing 1.260 kg of charas. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alok Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving IPC offences (452, 354-B, 427, 506, 120-B) and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …

RAKESH SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rakesh Shakya was arrested in connection with Crime No. 49 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, asserting false implication and noting that …

SANJEEV PATHAK ALIAS SUDHIR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sanjeev Pathak, who is accused under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, long pre‑trial …

SHAH NAWAZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shah Nawaz, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8 and 20) for alleged possession of 16.5 kg of ganja and joint possession of 148 kg recovered from a container. …

NEERAJ VATS @ NEERUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Neeraj Vats, who was arrested in a NDPS case involving the alleged recovery of 182 kg of ganja from a container shared with co‑accused. The applicant claimed …

PRASHANT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Prashant Kumar, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, noting …

RITIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ritik, who is charged with assault by firearm under Sections 109(1) and 115(2) of the same statute and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant …

YADRAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant, an employee of a …

SATYAPRAKASH SHIVHARE ALIAS SONU SHIVHARE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for two accused in a case registered under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act involving alleged recovery of 40 kg of ganja each from two vehicles. The applicants contended …

ASLAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aslam, who was arrested on 24‑12‑2024 for alleged possession of 210 kg of ganja in connection with an NDPS case (Sections 8, 20, 29). The applicant claimed innocence, …

VIKAS PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vikas Patel, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

JITENDRA @ JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jitendra @ Jeetu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …

INDRAPAL URF NIDHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Indrapal Urf Nidha, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had …

ANOOP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Anoop Yadav, who was charged under multiple sections of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that he was …

AMIT GURUNGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit Gurung, who was arrested in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case (Sections 8, 22, 23) for allegedly possessing small quantities of Diazepam, …

SUMITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Sumit filed a second bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28707 of 2023) after his first bail plea was rejected on merits on 24 February 2023. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant for the second hearing, while the learned Additional Government Advocate …

RAMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Raman, who is accused in Crime No.331 of 2025 of offences including sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109(1), 352 of the same Act, Section 7 of the Criminal Law …

BHUPENDRA PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Bhupendra Patel who was charged under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 28.135 kg of ganja recovered …

NITIN BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin Babu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the same Act and Section 13 of the Public Gambling …

HIMANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Himanshu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the same Act and Section 13 of the Public Gambling …

ASGAR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Asgar Ali, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault and violations of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that he had no …

YASEEN PATHAN @ YASEEN GHODAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yaseen Pathan, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with a firearm and multiple offences under the B.N.S.S. and the Arms Act. The …

ANIL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Singh, who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 400 g of heroin. The applicant claimed innocence, …

KISHAN PAL @ PUNCHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kishan Pal @ Punch, who was arrested in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivam, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

ZUBAIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Zubair who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted …

SHUBHAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shubham, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

GOVIND KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Govind Kushwaha, who was arrested on 19‑12‑2025 in connection with offences under Sections 3 to 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Section 99 of the BNS. The …

NITAI SARKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitai Sarkar, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case involving alleged possession of 64 kg of ganja. The applicant claimed false implication and alleged non‑compliance with …

SHAMIM ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shamim Ansari, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 46 of 2025) involving multiple BNS offences and Section 66D of the IT Act. The applicant …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akhand Pratap Singh, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

JAKIR HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jakir Hussain, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

YOGESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yogesh Kumar, who was arrested for alleged possession of 28.100 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that mandatory provisions of …

NAZAMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nazama, who is charged under Sections 8 and 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 5.075 kg of charas. The …

RAHUL PANDEY ALIAS MAYANK PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul Pandey alias Mayank Pandey, who was arrested in Crime No. 805 of 2025 under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social …

DHARMAVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dharmaveer, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged theft of 3.893 kg of white metal and offences under Sections 112(2), 317(2), 317(5) …

SANJEEVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Sanjeev, who was charged with multiple offences including Sections 191(2), 190, 121, 132, 221, 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The …

SATYAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Satyapal Singh, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 25 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of Rs 2,20,000 and cash of Rs 1,40,000. The …

SANDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sandeep, who is accused under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, had …

SUNEEL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Suneel Kumar, who was charged with IPC offences (420, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66‑C, 66‑D) relating to alleged cyber fraud and forged GST refunds. The applicant …

ANUSUIYA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anusuiya Devi, who was arrested in a case registered under several provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

ABHISHEK SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abhishek Sharma, who was arrested in Crime No. 4 of 2024 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

ABDUL RAHIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abdul Rahim, who is accused under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, had been in custody …

AJAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajaj, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …

AKHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akhil, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. Akhil claimed he was falsely implicated and …

IRSHAD ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Irshad Alam, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 26 of 2025) alleging that he opened fire, causing simple injuries to three persons under Section 109 …

SMT RANU @ KUSMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Smt Ranu @ Kusma, who had been in custody since 25‑12‑2025 in a case involving multiple serious offences. The applicant claimed innocence, pointed to her name appearing …

UTTAMDASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Uttamdas, who is charged under Sections 9, 39, 48, 49(Kha), 50, 51 and 57 of the Wildlife Protection Act for possession of protected tortoises. The applicant …

KAMAL SINGH SON OF TULARAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Kamal Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

NARESH KUMAR @ GUNDAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naresh Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 463 g of diazepam powder. The applicant argued that he was …

DANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Danish, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

SHIVAM PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shivam Patel, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 72 of 2025) involving Sections 318(4), 338, 61(2) of the BNS and Section 66(d) of the IT Act. The …

VISHAL @ SHUBHNIT TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vishal @ Shubhnit Trivedi was arrested in Crime No. 0010 of 2024 for alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Sections 66-C, 66-D of the IT Act. He has been in custody since 30‑12‑2025 and claims innocence, asserting that the only link to him is a mention in the …

MEHARBAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for two accused in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely …

NAVRATAN RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Navratan Rajbhar, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gaurav, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, highlighted that he was already on …

ASHISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ashish, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he threw his step‑children into a drain, though no serious injury was reported. The applicant claimed innocence …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sameer, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 0452 of 2022) for allegedly possessing 200 g of alprazolam. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

NEERAJ KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Maurya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, asserted that …

KUNAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kunal Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged receipt of illicit funds and offences under Sections 318(2), 319(2), 338(3), 3(5) …

BABLOO RATHORE @ BABLOO @ GOLDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Babloo Rathore, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

NAGESHWAR MANDALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nageshwar Mandal, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged withdrawal of Rs. 8,38,402. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and …

VIVEK @ VIVEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vivek Kumar, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 12 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was falsely …

MAYANK @ SACHIN BHARDWAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mayank @ Sachin Bhardwaj, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while trial proceeds for an offence under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

NAUSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naushad, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the same Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act for an alleged cyber‑fraud involving …

RITIK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ritik Kumar, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8/20) for alleged possession of 155 kg of ganja recovered from a co‑accused's house. The applicant claimed …

JITENDRA @ JITUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jitendra @ Jitu, who was charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 34.5 kg of ganja. The …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vijay Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 16.398 kg of charas. Singh contended that he had been falsely …

ASIM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Asim Khan who was arrested in a narcotics case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 500 grams of heroin. The applicant argued that the mandatory …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sachin Kumar, who was arrested in connection with offences under IPC Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed …

RAHUL KHANGARversusState of U.P.

The applicant, Rahul Khangar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the State's learned A.G.A., Shiv Dutt Shukla, was present. The court observed that the applicant showed no …

KESAIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused in a murder‑related case (Criminal No. 137 of 2020). The applicant, represented by counsel Rakesh Pathak, claimed innocence, alleged false …

ELAN KUJURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Elan Kujur, who was charged under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 66‑D of the IT Act for alleged cyber fraud involving Rs 49,999. The applicant pleaded …

ARVIND KOAL @ DAGAversusState of UP

Arvind Koal @ Daga applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Sandeep Pandey, did not appear, though the Assistant Government Advocate was present. The court examined a report from the District Judge, Mirzapur dated 9 March 2026, which showed that the trial of the …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sunil Kumar, who was arrested for allegedly possessing two Aadhaar cards with different dates of birth and using them to obtain two examination admit cards, thereby …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Deepak, who is charged with cyber‑fraud offences under various BNS provisions and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant asserted innocence, contending that his name …

SACHIN BHADAUTIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sachin Bhadautia, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel Prashant Mishra informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the bail relief and sought permission to withdraw the application. The court …

RAHUL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rahul Yadav, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving Sections 3(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. …

HEMENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Hemendra Singh, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed …

MUSHRIV ALIAS AMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mushriv alias Aman, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving IPC offences (419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120B) and Section 66D of the Information …

SAURABH GUPTA @ SAURABH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Saurabh Gupta, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged supply of codeine‑based cough syrups under the NDPS Act. He claimed false implication and argued that his conduct, if any, pertained only to a licence violation under the Drugs and …

ILHAM UR REHMAN SHAMSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ilham Ur Rehman Shamshi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant sought time to file a supplementary affidavit to show compliance with a condition imposed in the interim bail order. The court considered the request and listed the matter for …

JAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jay Singh, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4889 of 2020, seeking release on bail if arrested in connection with Crime No. 37 of 2015 under Sections 452 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first bail application had already been …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Salman, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7151 of 2020, seeking bail in a case (Crime No. 239 of 2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 452, 354, 354(Ka) and 376D of the Indian Penal Code. The first bail application had …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Anil, filed a second criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 12027 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court after his first bail application had been dismissed. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …

SHAILENDRA SINGH @ SAINEEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shailendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2017) involving alleged offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. This was the third bail application filed by the applicant, after two earlier applications …

PREMversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 84 of 2019) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376-D and 506, Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and Section 3(2) of the SC/ST Act. This was the second bail application filed; the first had …

GUDIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gudiya, filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 IPC. Her earlier anticipatory bail request was rejected by the Allahabad High Court in 2020 after being heard on merits. She argued that …

DEVENDRA @ BABLOOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Devendra (Babloo), was summoned in a complaint case alleging criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 406. He filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that the two offences cannot stand together as …

DINESH @ GUDDAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dinesh @ Gudda, filed a third criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court noted that the applicant's earlier two bail applications …

PRABHAKAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prabhakar Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 160 of 2016) involving charges under Sections 498-A, 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. This was the third bail application filed by the applicant, the earlier …

SANTI ALIAS GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santi alias Gaurav, filed a second anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30365 of 2020, seeking release on bail if arrested in Crime No. 74 of 2018 under Sections 306 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The first anticipatory bail application had already …

SMT HARVANSH KAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Harvansh Kaur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged illicit liquor possession and assault on police officers, with charges under multiple IPC sections and other statutes. She contended that she was falsely implicated, was a minor at …

SACHIN @ YOGESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sachin @ Yogesh, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The first bail application had already been rejected by the same court. No counsel …

NUTAN THAKURversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nutan Thakur in connection with an FIR lodged after a 26‑year delay alleging fraud and forgery in the allotment of an industrial plot (IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The …

RAJESH KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Kumar Yadav, a postal employee accused of absconding with approximately Rs. 25.36 lakh. The applicant argued his innocence, highlighted a two‑month delay in filing the FIR, and cited postal rules that require cash …

SACHINversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sachin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, in connection with Crime No. 69 of 2026. He claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged against an unknown person …

ALOK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Alok Mishra under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 306 of 2025 alleging assault causing eye injury. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged against unknown persons …

VISHNUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vishnu, was implicated in a case (Crime No.13 of 2026) alleging that he struck a motorcyclist with his car, causing simple injury, under sections 109, 115(2), 324(4) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, …

RAVI YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Ravi Yadav, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 362 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was …

MUTTU ALIAS MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Muttu alias Mukesh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 305(Ka) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged against an unknown …

SOHAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Soham Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application and instead approach the Sessions Court. The court considered the request and, …

RAVENDRA KUMAR HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ravendra Kumar Harijan in a complaint case alleging offences under IPC sections 392, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record and willingness to cooperate, …

VIRENDRA KUMAR HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Virendra Kumar Harijan in a complaint case involving alleged offences of dacoity, assault, criminal intimidation and extortion under IPC Sections 392, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant …

SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an application for anticipatory bail under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 filed by Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Sudhir Singh, who were alleged to be involved in a criminal case (Crime No. 336 of 2023) and were …

MITHLESH KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Mithlesh Kumar Verma, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case alleging criminal breach of trust under Sections 303(1) and 316(3) of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that the alleged loss arose from a truck accident and subsequent …

VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Vijay under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 287 of 2025) involving alleged attempts to seize property using forged documents. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that …

PHOOLMATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Phoolmati Devi under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a case registered under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the cows were …

ROHIT SENGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rohit Sengar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an alleged offence under Section 238 of the BNS, 2023. The court noted that the offence is bailable, and therefore anticipatory bail is not maintainable. The application was dismissed on the ground of …

GYANENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Gyanendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case where a supplementary charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 354‑B IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, arising from a land dispute. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had already been granted regular bail for …

UMESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Umesh Kumar and Smt. Poonam Devi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged receipt of insurance money. They claimed innocence, asserted that a co‑accused had already been granted interim anticipatory bail, and …

KAPIL SONAKIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Kapil Sonakiya, who alleged that he was falsely implicated in a fraud case involving a sale deed and that he was not named in the FIR. The applicant asserted his …

DEEPAK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Deepak Kumar, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The FIR named a co‑accused, Mohd. Ahmad, for filling LPG in a vehicle registered in …

MULCHANDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Mulchandra and Sunil, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 13 of 2026 alleging assault with a hard blunt object and a sharp-edged weapon. They claimed innocence, asserted that no specific role was assigned to them, …

RAVI GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravi Gupta under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a loan‑fraud case (Crime No. 356 of 2025) involving alleged receipt of brokerage and facilitation of a Rs. 32 lakh loan. The applicant claimed innocence and …

BANTU @ HARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bantu @ Harendra, sought anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged assault under sections 191(2), 115(2), 118(1), 110 and 352. He claimed innocence, stating that the allegations were generic and that co‑accused had already been granted regular …

MOHD FARMAN @ FARMAN PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Farman @ Farman Pradhan under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged possession of 224.240 kg of contraband ganja under the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of any incriminating …

BIHARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bihari, was implicated as the owner of a vehicle from which nine live bulls were recovered, leading to charges under several sections of the B.N.S., the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act. He filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC …

SURENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Surendra Singh, who claimed innocence and alleged false implication in a fraud case. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not a vendor, vendee, or …

RAMA RAOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rama Rao, filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33649 of 2019) in connection with Crime No. 197 of 2017, wherein he was charged under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant sought that, if arrested, he be released on bail. …

PANKAJ @ SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj @ Shankar, who is accused in Crime No. 740 of 2021 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was assigned to him, and …

ANKIT @ SARVESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ankit @ Sarvesh, filed a second criminal bail application (No. 36546 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court noted that this was the second bail application, …

AKHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 307 of 2017) involving charges under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant sought bail in the event of arrest. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed …

RANJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Ranjeet filed a second criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 45736 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court noted that this was the second bail application, …

KUNAL @ MONTIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Kunal @ Monti, filed a third anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 458 of 2017) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 376 and 504 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The application sought that, if arrested, the applicant be released on bail. The High Court …

VIRENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Virendra, filed a third anticipatory bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 53880 of 2019, seeking release on bail if arrested in a case (Crime No. 803 of 2017) under Sections 304 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The application was filed before the High Court of …

SANJU @ JHANDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sanju @ Jhandu, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a case under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Sections 5 and 6, seeking release on bail if arrested. The first bail application had already been rejected by the same court on merits. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while …

ANKIT GANGWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ankit Gangwar applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court, filing a second bail application after his first was dismissed. No counsel appeared on his behalf, while the State's learned AGA was present. The court noted that this was a repeat application and that the prosecution had not …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Usman, who is accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a woman. The applicant argued that he is innocent, has been in judicial custody since September 2022, and that key witnesses are either hostile or …

SARITA ALIAS GUDDAL ALIAS GUDDI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarita alias Guddal alias Guddi Devi, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The applicant argued that she was not named …

JAGDISH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jagdish Yadav under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1) of the Gangster Act in Crime No. 143 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was already on bail in two related cases, and disclosed a prior …

PRINCE KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prince Kumar Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0022 of 2026 alleging assault on a first informant. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no specific role was assigned to him, …