Created by Fuzzy Cloud

YOGESH DUBEY JOINT REGISTRAR JUDICIAL

642 judgments · newest first · showing 601–642

SHIVA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Gangster Act. The applicants, already on regular bail in a related gang‑related case, claimed innocence and asserted …

SURAJ GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Suraj Goswami under several provisions of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating his name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement and not in the FIR, and offered to cooperate with the investigation. The …

DIVYANSHU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Divyanshu Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under IPC sections 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 109. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was …

VIKAS JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vikas Jaiswal under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 60 of the Excise Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his name appeared only in the confessional statements …

ALI RAZAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Ali Raza, who is alleged to be a marginal witness to a 1990 gift deed (hibbanama) and is implicated in Crime No. 84 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant pleaded innocence and offered to cooperate …

RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET @ LALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjeet Kumar under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Crime No. 0337 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name surfaced only in the confessional statement of …

NIRDOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nirdosh Kumar, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 342 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that co‑accused Sunil …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vishal, the younger brother‑in‑law of the informant, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2025) alleging outraging the modesty of the informant's daughter, among other offences. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal …

SARFARAZ AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarfaraz Ahmad and two others, who were accused of offences under Sections 420 and 120B IPC. The applicants claimed innocence, asserted that a co‑accused had already received interim …

KAISAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kaisar and Shahmat, were charged in a 2019 case under several IPC offences including rioting, assault and attempt to murder. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, asserting innocence and willingness to cooperate with the …

NAWAB ANSARI @ GUDDU WARSI @ FITWELL TAILORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nawab Ansari (also known as Guddu Warsi and Fitwell Tailor) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 41 and 102 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating …

JITENDRA @ JEETU @ JEETAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Jitendra, accused of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 404 of the IPC, alleging murder and related crimes. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of criminal history, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The prosecution …

TAUFEEQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Taufeeq, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 283 of 2025, which involved charges under several sections of the B.N.S. He asserted his innocence and relied on an interim protection order dated 09‑09‑2025. The State …

EBAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ebal Singh, sought bail in a criminal case (Cr. No. 640 of 2022) involving charges of rioting, criminal force, criminal misappropriation, voluntarily causing hurt, attempt to murder and murder under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 307 and 302 of the IPC. He had been in jail for four …

SANDEEP CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sandeep Chauhan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 627 of 2021) involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376, 120B and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The first bail application had been dismissed by the High Court on 16 February 2023. No counsel …

RISHIKANTversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 581 of 2021) involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the trial was at an advanced stage, with defence witness examination underway, and that the applicant's earlier …

ANGAD CHAMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Angad Chamar, filed a second bail application in Criminal Case No. 03 of 2020, which involved offences under Sections 376D and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The first bail application (No. 32712 of 2020) had been rejected by the Allahabad High Court on …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Usman, sought bail for charges of murder, criminal conspiracy and criminal intimidation (IPC sections 302, 120‑B and 506) in a case registered as Crime No. 60 of 2019. This was the third bail application filed; the first two had been rejected by the same High Court. No counsel …

ZAHID HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Zahid Husain, charged in Crime No. 430 of 2022 under multiple IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Moral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the Juvenile Justice Act, applied for an enlargement of bail during the trial. This was his second bail application; the first one (No. 33343 of 2022) had been rejected …

MANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Manish, filed a second bail application (No. 38756 of 2023) seeking release on bail for offences under IPC sections 364, 302, 201 and 34 in Mahroni police station, Lalitpur. The first bail application (No. 36603 of 2022) had been rejected by the same court. No counsel appeared for the …

DESHRAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Deshraj, filed a second anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 610 of 2016) under Section 3364‑A of the Indian Penal Code, seeking release if arrested. The application was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, with counsel Irshad Ahmad …

SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Sagar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for either party, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined the trial court’s report dated 13‑02‑2026, which indicated that the trial had …

ARUNversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Arun filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 42873 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for either party, but the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined the trial court report dated 11 February 2026, which indicated …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Rahul filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 42940 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The trial of the underlying case had already been concluded on 26 March 2025, as per the report dated 11 February 2026 from the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rampur. No …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 44434 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared before the court except the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. The court examined the trial report dated 19 January 2026, which …

KALLU @ AYUBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Kallu @ Ayub sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B of the IPC. This was his second bail application; the first, filed in 2021, had been rejected on merit. The prosecution argued that the accused’s statements had …

BHURA @ NARENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Bhura @ Narendra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 267 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the IPC. This was his second bail application; the first (No. 44235 of 2022) had been rejected on merit. Counsel argued that the trial was progressing …

FIROZ AHAMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz Ahamad, who is accused under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC for murder. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the case rests solely on circumstantial evidence, and that no substantive material besides …

OM PRAKASH @ LALLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 376, 452, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, claiming that he had been in jail for four years without any witness examination. The court noted that this was the second bail application and that the …

SHAGEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 51064 of 2023, the petitioner Shageer (represented by counsel Abhinav Dwivedi and Mohd. Jamshed Khan) sought bail for the accused Mr. Ashish Kumar Tripathi. The State of U.P., represented by A.G.A. G.A., opposed the bail. During the hearing, counsel for the …

ANIRUDDACHARYA CHELA BHAGWAN DASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aniruddacharya Chela Bhagwan Das, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been granted bail by the Sessions …

MULAYAM SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Mulayam Singh and Mainudeen @ Irshad Ali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act concerning alleged illegal possession of urea. They argued that they had cooperated with the …

GURPREET SINGH BALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Gurpreet Singh Bal, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 56 of 2024) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Excise Act sections 60 and 63, relating to the transport of 750 litres of liquor with …

KISHOR SINGH CHANDELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by journalist Kishor Singh Chandel, who was charged under IPC sections 386, 504, 506 and 500 for alleged extortion. The applicant argued that he had not been served with any summons or warrant, …

SATYAM SINHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Satyam Sinha under Sections 110 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code in a case involving alleged assault resulting in a fractured parietal bone. The applicant argued that he had no specific role in the incident, …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, a government servant, was accused of embezzling Rs.2,39,498 under IPC sections 420 and 409. He had refunded the entire amount to the State exchequer and had previously been granted interim anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench. The State opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The …

AJIT MISHRAversusState of U.P.

The applicant, Ajit Mishra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He later informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue anticipatory bail and intended to seek regular bail before the trial court. The learned counsel for the applicant …

KAKA@ HARSH CHAUHANversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Kaka@Harsh Chauhan filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking protection against arrest. The application was listed for fresh hearing on 23 May 2022. No counsel or the applicant appeared before the court on the scheduled date. …

RUKHSAR KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioners, Rukhsar Khatoon and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 137(2) BNS dated 13‑04‑2025 and protection from arrest. They contended that both were adults at the time of the alleged incident, relying on birth certificates and Aadhaar details, …

ASHUTOSH AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ashutosh and two others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh opposed the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate sought a two‑week extension to file a …

AMIT JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Amit Jaiswal filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. Counsel for the applicant, Divya Yadav, moved the court to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of the applicant’s arrest. The …