Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Excise Act

2120 judgments · newest first · showing 2001–2120

Vipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 8.625 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was found in a joint family house, he …

Vijay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vijay Singh, the owner of a motorcycle from which 8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and a clean criminal record. The petitioner argued that ownership of the vehicle does not …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 2.160 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the complaint …

Surendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Surendra Singh was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 27.720 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware of his friend’s misuse of …

Baso DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baso Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from a joint family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the …

Radhika DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radhika Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from a neighbour's house and a street in front of her residence. She argued that no liquor was found in her …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pankaj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 459.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued he had no possession, was not the owner, and the case relied on a confessional statement made in police custody, which he …

Bigan Chaudhary @ Bigan @ Bigan Kr. ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Bigan Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the sack did not belong to him, and the complaint …

Abhay Kumar Yadav @ Dhanji YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Abhay Kumar Yadav and Umesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 15.87 litres of liquor from a collapsed house. They argued that they were not caught in possession, the FIR omitted the …

Shobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shobha Devi, a resident of Garju Bigha in Gaya district, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 8 litres of liquor from Sita Devi's house and 6 litres from her own house. She contended that she had no conscious …

Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 506 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He asserted that he had a clean criminal record, was not the owner of the seized vehicle, and was …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, that the seizure was based on the testimony of a chowkidar …

Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Gudar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akhilesh Kumar Singh was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 8.64 litres of liquor from his motorcycle, although he was not caught with the liquor and was not apprehended at the spot. The petitioner argued that mere ownership of the vehicle should not constitute possession and …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.9 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that it was not in his conscious possession, and that he has a clean …

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Prem Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 290 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of …

Manoj Prasad @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Prasad sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 274, 275(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 1,980 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not …

Sachin Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar Mandal, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of 72 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned, under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he was not in possession of the …

Ajay BinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging possession of liquor recovered from locations unrelated to him. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the allegations were based solely on a confessional statement …

Vinod Kumar @ Langra @ Langda @ LagdaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vinod Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from two other individuals, Shriniwas Kumar and Dipak Kumar, with no material found in Vinod's possession. The petitioner argued …

Naresh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Naresh Prasad, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of four litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware that …

Amresh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amresh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to …

Udeya RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Udeya Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, had a clean criminal record, and that ownership of the …

Chandan Mahato @ Chandan Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chandan Mahato, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was …

Arun Singh @ HariomversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Arun Singh and his son Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 21.75 litres of liquor and 54 litres of beer recovered from a cowshed on Arun Singh's premises. They argued they have clean …

Ramesh MurmuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Murmu, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 60 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated only through the …

Sima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sima Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was unaware of any misuse of her vehicle by a …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from his vehicle. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and that his nephew Hira Lal had …

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav @ YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No.‑77/2017) for alleged offences under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Excise Act, concerning the recovery of five quintals of Mahua flower from an auto‑rickshaw. He contended that …

Lalbabu Manjhi @ Lala Babu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalbabu Manjhi, a resident of Chitnawan Mushari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 105 litres of liquor and 2,000 litres of Jawa Mahua that were seized and destroyed. He contended that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, …

Mahesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahesh Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from his tobacco shop. He contended that the liquor was seized in his absence and that the police relied on secret information without proper …

Md. Rakim @ Md. Rakim AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Rakim Ali, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly possessing 4.52 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend misused the vehicle. The State …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from an under‑constructed house and a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishal Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He contended that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused the …

Santoke Bhuiya @ Santokhi BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santoke Bhuiya sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was only the owner of the …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akash Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend had misused his …

Kishori Kewat @ Kishori PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishori Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 15.8 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a public place near a brick kiln. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery site did not belong …

Nitish Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that he owned. He claimed the motorcycle had been stolen, a fact he reported to police on 23-02-2024, and argued that no liquor was …

Md. Minhaj AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Minhaj Alam, owner of a scooty from which 4.68 litres of liquor was recovered, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that he was not in possession at …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Rai @ Suraj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented jaggery from a public area not in his possession. He argued that the FIR lacked a proper informant, that the alleged …

Chhote PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhote Paswan sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his joint family house and from another house. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …

Rana Pratap KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rana Pratap Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 10 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused …

Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 157.2 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, that the liquor was …

Umesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Umesh Chaudhary, was implicated in an excise case (PS No. 477 of 2025) for alleged possession of 50 litres of liquor and 400 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua, alleged under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from …

Bindeshwari ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bindeshwari Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not caught in possession, that the liquor was not in his conscious control, …

Ishwardhari DinkarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ishwardhari Dinkar and Bhim Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Sone river bank. They argued they have clean antecedents, no liquor was found in their …

Rahul Kumar @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Tapan Yadav @ Tapan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tapan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a public hut near a temple. He has two prior criminal cases, one also under the Excise Act, but the alleged liquor was …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 51 litres of liquor from a scooty. He has three prior criminal cases and contends that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious …

Rakesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 30.75 litres of liquor were recovered from a third‑party, Madan, and not from his own possession. He contended that the case against …

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's …

Amarjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarjit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 102 litres of liquor from a public area near an Ahar. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was accessible to the public, and the …

Nawal RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nawal Roy, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 102 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in the act, the seized vehicle was not his, and the complaint originated from a chowkidar, raising doubts about …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 29 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware of any …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was …

DINANATH RAMversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinanath Ram, feared arrest in a case alleging that 25.20 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, invoking Sections 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no clean antecedent, was not arrested …

SANJAY PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 666 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

Amarnath PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amarnath Pandey sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 84.48 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was only the owner of …

Santosh Chaudhary @ Santosh Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.250 litres of liquor recovered from Baleshwar Kumar. The petitioner, who has thirteen prior cases, argued that he was not caught in …

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, that the seized liquor was …

Aakash Kumar @ Aakash Kumar Singh @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Aakash Kumar and Bittu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 206 litres of liquor from a vehicle. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their …

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 4.77 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession and the case was based solely on a confessional statement of …

Akhilesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 7,662.6 litres of liquor from a truck and five pickup vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

Gaytri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaytri Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 4.32 litres of liquor were recovered from her joint family house and 360 ml from Anuj Kumar. The petitioner, a woman with one prior case, argued that she had no …

Mukesh ManjhiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Manjhi was implicated in a case (PS No. 253 of 2021) for allegedly possessing eight litres of liquor, alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor …

Ashok sardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ashok Sardar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 53.875 litres of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his …

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a vehicle registered in his mother’s name. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle at the time, was unaware of his friend’s alleged misuse, …

Bihari Kumar @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bihari Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 111.6 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was implicated by a …

Dhanjee YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Ishivipur, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the alleged …

Dinkar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinkar Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 167.4 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, asserting that he …

Sattan Prasad VermaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sattan Prasad Verma, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 90 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pintu Kumar, a resident of Nalanda, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his immediate …

Parwati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Parwati Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor from her house, which she claims is joint family property and that she had no conscious possession. She argued that the amendment to …

Gulzar Ansari @ GulzanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulzar Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 288 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vehicle not owned by him. He argued that the police had no …

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar and Umesh Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from the roof of a house that is part of a joint family property. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the …

Prabhat Sharma @ Prabhat KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prabhat Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections (468, 471, 420, 414, 34) and the Bihar Excise Act (30(a), 32, 36, 41) relating to the alleged recovery of 5,951.880 litres of liquor from five vehicles. He contended that he …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rekha Devi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from her joint family house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the house is jointly owned, and the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a vehicle he owned was seized containing 328.5 liters of liquor, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware of …

Daroga RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Daroga Rai and Moti Rai, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a bamboo orchard. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in their …

Benga SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Pakaridayal, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from the shop of petitioner No. 3. They argued that the liquor was seized in the absence of …

Shiokant Devi @ Shivkanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shiokant Devi, owner of an auto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from her vehicle. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession, and had a clean criminal record, …

Mahendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra Singh, a resident of Aurangabad, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4 litres of liquor and destruction of 60 litres of fermented jaggery solution from a hut that does not belong to him. He contended that he had no …

Sonu Nut @ Sonu NatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Bajit Bhoraha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor and 2000 litres of Mahua pass. They contended that the alleged seizure was from a public …

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor and a liquor‑containing solution from forest areas and a motorcycle. He contended that nothing was seized from his conscious …

Yogi Manjhi @ Yogi MajhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogi Manjhi, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house, with the prosecution alleging recovery of 5 litres of liquor and 40 litres of Naushadhar solution. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in …

Anuj Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Kumar Mahto, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 275 of 2025) for alleged recovery of 2,700 litres of spirit from his Bolero pickup vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and …

VIKASH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a motorcycle and his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the house was joint …

Lal Mohan Ray @ Lalmohan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lal Mohan Ray applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 103.86 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. The petitioner claimed he was not in possession of the liquor and that the complaint was filed by a hostile …

BIPIN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor from a mini‑truck, a car and a motorcycle seized from a poultry farm. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, that the seized items were …

DHARAM RAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, D.R. Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the seizure of 2,289 litres of liquor from a mini‑truck, a car and a motorcycle linked to his poultry farm. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, that none of the liquor was found in …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 430.50 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he had no prior criminal …

Sanket Sahani @ Sanket SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sanket Sahani and Saroj Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and Mahua from a public pond. They contended that they were not …

Amal Singh @ Amal SinghaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amal Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 161.400 litres of liquor from a Maruti Swift owned by him. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no …

Rimani KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rimani Kumari was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware that a friend misused her …

Rahul KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Kumar, owner of a motorcycle from which 30 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of his friend's alleged misuse of the vehicle, …

Ramashankar RayversusThe State of BIhar

DISPOSED

Ramashankar Ray was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 26.5 litres of liquor in a hardware shop that is part of a joint family business. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, …

Radheshyam SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Radheshyam Sharma, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after 99.9 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the seizure was not from his conscious …

Ramji ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramji Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and that the 2018 …

Satyendra Patel @ Satyendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Patel, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no knowledge or possession of the liquor. He asserted a clean criminal …

Ankit Raj @ Ankit Kumar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ankit Raj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 250 litres of liquor in a Santro car. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the vehicle was not his, and the only basis for his implication was a confessional …

Laxman YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 444 of 2025) for alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, involving the recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not apprehended at the …

Kamal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamal Sahni, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor and 6,000 litres of fermented Mahua solution from a public place. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and that the …

Vivek RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vivek Ram was implicated in a case (P.S. Case No. 447 of 2025) for allegedly recovering 509 litres of liquor from a poultry farm, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, the recovery was made from a location adjacent to his premises, …

Pitambar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious possession, the recovery site did …

Dhiraj YadavversusThe STATE of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dhiraj Yadav and Navin Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a public canal area. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the informant’s identity was …

Asho YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Asho Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.375 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the …

Mani Bhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mani Bhushan Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 171 litres of liquor from five sacks tied to a motorcycle. He contended that the police had not seized any liquor from his immediate possession and that the only information came from a …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from public places. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery …

Mahanth Chaudhary @ Mahanth ChaudhuryversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahanth Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 711 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the …

Shaligram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Shaligram Paswan and Nirdosh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of liquor. They contended that they were not caught in possession, the liquor was recovered from a public area, and …

Deepak Paswan @ Deepak Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 46 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that no arrest was made at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and …

Abhimanyu Paul @ Abhimanyu PalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Paul, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from his Hyundai car. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession of it, and that the seizure was solely …

Roopu Ram @ Rupu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Roopu Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 11.25 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …

Kanhaiya Paswan @ Kanhaiya Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8.1 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, …

Binod RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Binod Ram, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 0.72 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a third party, Suraj, …

Vijay Mahto @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 494.64 litres of liquor at a straw house adjacent to his residence. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, the straw house is a public area, and the complaint was …

Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhotu Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a sack. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was recovered from a place not belonging to him, and the only evidence is a …

Guddu Mishra @ Aditya Chandra MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Mishra sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.76 litres of liquor from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession of the liquor. He argued that the …

Vinod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vinod Yadav and Badhu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, were not the owners of the vehicle, and were implicated solely …

Pintu Paswan @ Raj Kishore PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Paswan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor and destruction of 1500 litres of semi‑fermented mahua. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, argued that no arrest was made, …